<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">

<channel>
	<title>Law Blog</title>
	
	<link>http://blogs.wsj.com/law</link>
	<description>WSJ on the cases, trends and personalities of interest to the business community.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 23:28:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
    <copyright>copyright © 2013 Dow Jones &amp; Company, Inc.</copyright>
    
		<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/wsj/law/feed" /><feedburner:info uri="wsj/law/feed" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><item>
		<title>Are More Casinos Coming to New York? Don’t Bet On It</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/wsj/law/feed/~3/OturQq_v7kA/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2013/06/19/are-more-casinos-coming-to-new-york-dont-bet-on-it/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 23:24:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jacob Gershman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State Legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gambling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.wsj.com/law/?p=45124</guid>
		<description>The decision on whether to authorize a major expansion of casino gambling in New York now rests in the hands of its voters&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/wsj/law/feed/~4/OturQq_v7kA" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2013/06/19/are-more-casinos-coming-to-new-york-dont-bet-on-it/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<category>PAID</category>\n	<feedburner:origLink>http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2013/06/19/are-more-casinos-coming-to-new-york-dont-bet-on-it/?mod=WSJBlog</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>‘Fabulous Fab’ Will Have To Limit Talking About His Lawyers At Trial</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/wsj/law/feed/~3/La0FmQBHNXs/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2013/06/19/fabulous-fab-will-have-to-limit-talking-about-his-lawyers-at-trial/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 23:19:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chad Bray</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Civil Litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[civil litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fabrice Tourre]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goldman/SEC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawsuit]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.wsj.com/law/?p=45123</guid>
		<description>The lawyers for a former Goldman Sachs Group Inc. employee may have to engage in a bit of verbal gymnastics when his civil trial kicks off next month.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/wsj/law/feed/~4/La0FmQBHNXs" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2013/06/19/fabulous-fab-will-have-to-limit-talking-about-his-lawyers-at-trial/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<category>PAID</category>\n	<feedburner:origLink>http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2013/06/19/fabulous-fab-will-have-to-limit-talking-about-his-lawyers-at-trial/?mod=WSJBlog</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Dolce and Gabbana Convicted of Tax Evasion</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/wsj/law/feed/~3/8xomNVek9XI/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2013/06/19/dolce-and-gabbana-convicted-of-tax-evasion/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 19:52:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>WSJ Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dolce and Gabbana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[international law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[italy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.wsj.com/law/?p=45120</guid>
		<description>An Italian court on Wednesday sentenced Italian fashion designers Domenico Dolce and Stefano Gabbana to one year and eight months in prison for tax evasion&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/wsj/law/feed/~4/8xomNVek9XI" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2013/06/19/dolce-and-gabbana-convicted-of-tax-evasion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<category>PAID</category>\n	<feedburner:origLink>http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2013/06/19/dolce-and-gabbana-convicted-of-tax-evasion/?mod=WSJBlog</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>‘Footlong’ Fight Heads to Wisconsin</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/wsj/law/feed/~3/AgTXr_8DN-4/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2013/06/19/footlong-fight-heads-to-wisconsin/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 15:36:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jacob Gershman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawsuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[multi district litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[subway]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wisconsin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.wsj.com/law/?p=45117</guid>
		<description>Remember when life was simpler and the biggest scandal gripping our nation was sandwich-related? It may be comforting to know that the legal battle over the Subway "footlong" still beats on.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/wsj/law/feed/~4/AgTXr_8DN-4" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2013/06/19/footlong-fight-heads-to-wisconsin/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
	<category>PAID</category>\n	<feedburner:origLink>http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2013/06/19/footlong-fight-heads-to-wisconsin/?mod=WSJBlog</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>The AM Roundup: NSA Rebuts Critics; Google Fights Gag Order</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/wsj/law/feed/~3/FNhTWetf56k/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2013/06/19/the-am-roundup-nsa-rebuts-critics-google-fights-gag-order/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 12:40:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jacob Gershman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FBI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Glass]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Keith Alexander]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[major league baseball]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Security Agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[polar bears]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pro bono]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[raisins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Whitey Bulger]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.wsj.com/law/?p=45115</guid>
		<description>Law Blog rounds up the morning's news.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/wsj/law/feed/~4/FNhTWetf56k" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2013/06/19/the-am-roundup-nsa-rebuts-critics-google-fights-gag-order/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2013/06/19/the-am-roundup-nsa-rebuts-critics-google-fights-gag-order/?mod=WSJBlog</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Study: Patent Litigation Shows No Sign of Slowing</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/wsj/law/feed/~3/pvu50O1Ltd4/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2013/06/18/study-patent-litigation-shows-no-sign-of-slowing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 21:03:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ashby Jones</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Intellectual Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intellectual property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law and technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.wsj.com/law/?p=45107</guid>
		<description>Study: Patent Litigation Shows No Sign of Slowing&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/wsj/law/feed/~4/pvu50O1Ltd4" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2013/06/18/study-patent-litigation-shows-no-sign-of-slowing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<media:group><media:content url="http://s.wsj.net/public/resources/images/OB-XW811_edison_A_20130618141826.jpg" type="image/jpg" medium="image" /><media:content url="http://s.wsj.net/public/resources/images/OB-XW811_edison_D_20130618141826.jpg" type="image/jpg" medium="image" /><media:content url="http://s.wsj.net/public/resources/images/OB-XW811_edison_DV_20130618141826.jpg" type="image/jpg" medium="image" /></media:group><category>PAID</category>\n	<feedburner:origLink>http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2013/06/18/study-patent-litigation-shows-no-sign-of-slowing/?mod=WSJBlog</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Clarence Thomas, Stereotype Buster</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/wsj/law/feed/~3/vZ3_V6AoauM/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2013/06/18/clarence-thomas-stereotype-buster/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 20:07:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Landers</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clarence Thomas]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.wsj.com/law/?p=45112</guid>
		<description>As his 22nd year on the Supreme Court nears an end, Justice Clarence Thomas is upending some of the familiar nostrums about his work.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/wsj/law/feed/~4/vZ3_V6AoauM" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2013/06/18/clarence-thomas-stereotype-buster/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<category>PAID</category>\n	<feedburner:origLink>http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2013/06/18/clarence-thomas-stereotype-buster/?mod=WSJBlog</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Europeans Warn of ‘Unchecked’ Access to Cloud Data</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/wsj/law/feed/~3/UjaT5nixw28/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2013/06/18/europeans-warn-of-unchecked-access-to-cloud-data/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 18:54:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jacob Gershman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[foreign intelligence surveillance act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[University of Amsterdam]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.wsj.com/law/?p=45108</guid>
		<description>For people outside the United States -- including citizens of our most friendly allies -- the scope of surveillance allowed under American law may not seem so modest.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/wsj/law/feed/~4/UjaT5nixw28" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2013/06/18/europeans-warn-of-unchecked-access-to-cloud-data/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<media:group><media:content url="http://s.wsj.net/public/resources/images/TE-AA826A_QUIZ_A_20091011191344.jpg" type="image/jpg" medium="image" /><media:content url="http://s.wsj.net/public/resources/images/TE-AA826A_QUIZ_D_20091011191344.jpg" type="image/jpg" medium="image" /></media:group><category>PAID</category>\n	<feedburner:origLink>http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2013/06/18/europeans-warn-of-unchecked-access-to-cloud-data/?mod=WSJBlog</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>The AM Roundup: Setback for Pacts That Delay Sale of Generics</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/wsj/law/feed/~3/Ap8vSnvbhTA/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2013/06/18/the-am-roundup-setback-for-pacts-that-delay-sale-of-generics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 12:28:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jacob Gershman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[antitrust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[civil forfeiture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Edward Snowden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new york university]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[truancy courts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.wsj.com/law/?p=45105</guid>
		<description>Law Blog rounds up the morning's news.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/wsj/law/feed/~4/Ap8vSnvbhTA" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2013/06/18/the-am-roundup-setback-for-pacts-that-delay-sale-of-generics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2013/06/18/the-am-roundup-setback-for-pacts-that-delay-sale-of-generics/?mod=WSJBlog</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Former FTC Chairman Joins Davis Polk</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/wsj/law/feed/~3/w8BPxHJMCWk/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2013/06/17/former-ftc-chairman-joins-davis-polk/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 02:05:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brent Kendall</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Civil Litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intellectual Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[antitrust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ftc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pay-to-delay]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.wsj.com/law/?p=45101</guid>
		<description>&lt;div class="mceTemp" style="text-align: left"&gt;&lt;dl class="wp-caption alignright caption-alignright " style="width: 262px"&gt;&lt;dt class="wp-caption-dt"&gt;&lt;img class="size-full wp-image-5" src="http://s.wsj.net/public/resources/images/OB-VT978_liebow_D_20121223141259.jpg" alt="" width="262" height="174" /&gt;&lt;/dt&gt;&lt;dd class="wp-caption-dd wp-cite-dd" style="text-align: right"&gt;Bloomberg News&lt;/dd&gt;&lt;dd class="wp-caption-dd" style="text-align: left"&gt;Jon Leibowitz departed the FTC in February.&lt;/dd&gt;&lt;/dl&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
Recent Federal Trade Commission chairman Jon Leibowitz is moving from Official Washington to the world of Big Law, joining law firm Davis Polk &amp; Wardwell LLP.

The firm said Mr. Leibowitz, who left the agency in February, would join its antitrust team as well as provide counseling on privacy law, an area &lt;a href="http://www.davispolk.com/Davis-Polk-Welcomes-Former-FTC-Chairman-Jon-Leibowitz-06-17-2013/"&gt;where the FTC broke new ground&lt;/a&gt; under his leadership.

President Barack Obama picked Mr. Leibowitz to lead the five-member FTC in 2009, amid expectations that the administration’s antitrust nominees at the commission and the Justice Department would reinvigorate antitrust enforcement.

One of Mr. Leibowitz’s top priorities at the FTC was. . . . . . .&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/wsj/law/feed/~4/w8BPxHJMCWk" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2013/06/17/former-ftc-chairman-joins-davis-polk/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<category>PAID</category>\n	<feedburner:origLink>http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2013/06/17/former-ftc-chairman-joins-davis-polk/?mod=WSJBlog</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Did Prosecutors Blunder in Transfer of Ex-Guatemalan Leader?</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/wsj/law/feed/~3/IrYcpZyG1HY/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2013/06/17/did-prosecutors-blunder-in-transfer-of-ex-guatemalan-president/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2013 23:59:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jacob Gershman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal prosecutors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new jersey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.wsj.com/law/?p=45097</guid>
		<description>For airline travelers, the difference between a direct flight and a layover is often a matter of convenience. But when the passenger is an indicted defendant, the stakes can get much higher.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/wsj/law/feed/~4/IrYcpZyG1HY" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2013/06/17/did-prosecutors-blunder-in-transfer-of-ex-guatemalan-president/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<category>PAID</category>\n	<feedburner:origLink>http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2013/06/17/did-prosecutors-blunder-in-transfer-of-ex-guatemalan-president/?mod=WSJBlog</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Ex-SAC Trader To Get Documents From Cooperating Witness Laptop</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/wsj/law/feed/~3/HuEw8kvoeS4/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2013/06/17/ex-sac-trader-to-get-documents-from-cooperating-witness-laptop/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2013 22:17:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chad Bray</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Criminal Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[civil litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[criminal law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Insider Trading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sec]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[steven a cohen]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.wsj.com/law/?p=45094</guid>
		<description>The former SAC Capital Advisors LP trader at the center of one of the most lucrative insider-trading schemes ever charged will get access to the laptop of the government’s main witness against him, according to court documents made public Monday.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/wsj/law/feed/~4/HuEw8kvoeS4" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2013/06/17/ex-sac-trader-to-get-documents-from-cooperating-witness-laptop/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<category>PAID</category>\n	<feedburner:origLink>http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2013/06/17/ex-sac-trader-to-get-documents-from-cooperating-witness-laptop/?mod=WSJBlog</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Lawyers Behaving Badly? Malpractice Claims Up in 2012</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/wsj/law/feed/~3/CKSJ9yWXR0I/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2013/06/17/lawyers-behaving-badly-malpractice-claims-up-in-2012/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2013 20:52:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer Smith</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Civil Litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lawyers & Law Firms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[civil litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawyers and law firms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[malpractice]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.wsj.com/law/?p=45096</guid>
		<description>Disgruntled clients are slapping attorneys with more malpractice suits, seeking multimillion dollar claims over conflicts of interest and other alleged missteps, according to a survey of seven major insurers that provide lawyers’ professional-liability insurance.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/wsj/law/feed/~4/CKSJ9yWXR0I" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2013/06/17/lawyers-behaving-badly-malpractice-claims-up-in-2012/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
	<category>PAID</category>\n	<feedburner:origLink>http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2013/06/17/lawyers-behaving-badly-malpractice-claims-up-in-2012/?mod=WSJBlog</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Law Blog Video: Obamacare Spurs Health-Care Lawyer Boom</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/wsj/law/feed/~3/bPjjNEsaPlc/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2013/06/17/law-blog-video-obamacare-spurs-health-care-lawyer-boom/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2013 19:06:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>WSJ Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[healthcare law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawyer and law firms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obamacare]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.wsj.com/law/?p=45092</guid>
		<description>WSJ legal reporter Jennifer Smith discusses how the Affordable Care Act and other rules are sparking a mini-boom for specialist attorneys who can backstop overloaded internal teams and steer clients through an increasingly crowded regulatory minefield.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/wsj/law/feed/~4/bPjjNEsaPlc" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2013/06/17/law-blog-video-obamacare-spurs-health-care-lawyer-boom/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<category>PAID</category>\n	<feedburner:origLink>http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2013/06/17/law-blog-video-obamacare-spurs-health-care-lawyer-boom/?mod=WSJBlog</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Scotus Strikes Down Arizona Voting Law, But Leaves Opening</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/wsj/law/feed/~3/8_3YOWXlXw0/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2013/06/17/scotus-strikes-down-arizona-voting-law-but-leaves-opening/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2013 17:53:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jacob Gershman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State Legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scotus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voting rights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.wsj.com/law/?p=45089</guid>
		<description>The Supreme Court on Monday effectively shut the door on the ability of Arizona and other states to unilaterally tack on eligibility requirements to standard voter-registration forms required under federal law.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/wsj/law/feed/~4/8_3YOWXlXw0" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2013/06/17/scotus-strikes-down-arizona-voting-law-but-leaves-opening/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
	<category>PAID</category>\n	<feedburner:origLink>http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2013/06/17/scotus-strikes-down-arizona-voting-law-but-leaves-opening/?mod=WSJBlog</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Top Court Issues Antitrust, Voting Rules Decisions; Takes Up Housing</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/wsj/law/feed/~3/37wIVsP1_tc/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2013/06/17/top-court-issues-antitrust-voting-rules-decisions-takes-up-housing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2013 15:19:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jacob Gershman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[antitrust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[housing discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scotus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voting rights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.wsj.com/law/?p=45087</guid>
		<description>On Monday, the Supreme Court weighed in on several hot-button issues while following its custom of leaving its biggest decisions this year, including on affirmative action and gay marriage, for later.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/wsj/law/feed/~4/37wIVsP1_tc" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2013/06/17/top-court-issues-antitrust-voting-rules-decisions-takes-up-housing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<category>PAID</category>\n	<feedburner:origLink>http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2013/06/17/top-court-issues-antitrust-voting-rules-decisions-takes-up-housing/?mod=WSJBlog</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Legal Events to Watch This Week</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/wsj/law/feed/~3/XpUF_GtDaSA/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2013/06/17/legal-events-to-watch-this-week-57/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2013 12:36:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joe Palazzolo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Constitutional Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judicial nominations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wikileaks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.wsj.com/law/?p=45084</guid>
		<description>&lt;div class="mceTemp" style="text-align: left"&gt;&lt;dl class="wp-caption alignright caption-alignright " style="width: 262px"&gt;&lt;dt class="wp-caption-dt"&gt;&lt;img class="size-full wp-image-5" src="http://s.wsj.net/public/resources/images/OB-XV020_scotus_D_20130612122920.jpg" alt="" width="262" height="174" /&gt;&lt;/dt&gt;&lt;dd class="wp-caption-dd wp-cite-dd" style="text-align: right"&gt;Reuters&lt;/dd&gt;&lt;/dl&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;em&gt;This week: The trials of &lt;a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887324688404578541600482271928.html?KEYWORDS=+James+%22Whitey%22+Bulger"&gt;James "Whitey" Bulger&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887324904004578537772552755776.html?KEYWORDS=george+zimmerman"&gt;George Zimmerman&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887324904004578537772552755776.html?KEYWORDS=zimmerman"&gt;Bradley Manning&lt;/a&gt; continue, and the U.S. Supreme Court is poised to deliver a blockbuster or two.&lt;/em&gt;

&lt;strong&gt;Monday, June 17&lt;/strong&gt;

• The U.S. Supreme Court is expected to issue orders and opinions. &lt;a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2013/05/28/supreme-court-once-again-leaves-biggest-for-last/"&gt;We’re still waiting for rulings&lt;/a&gt; on affirmative action, gay marriage and voting rights in the 2012-13 term, which ends this month. We are also waiting to find out whether the justices will review &lt;a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2013/06/14/supreme-court-could-add-more-big-cases-amid-opinion-frenzy/"&gt;big cases&lt;/a&gt; next term, including one that may dictate the scope of the president's power to make appointments.

• Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and his four alleged 9/11 co-conspirators &lt;a href="http://www.pbs.org/newshour/rundown/2013/06/alleged-911-plotters.html"&gt;are slated to appear before a military commission&lt;/a&gt; for another round of pretrial motions. . . . . .&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/wsj/law/feed/~4/XpUF_GtDaSA" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2013/06/17/legal-events-to-watch-this-week-57/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<category>PAID</category>\n	<feedburner:origLink>http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2013/06/17/legal-events-to-watch-this-week-57/?mod=WSJBlog</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>The AM Roundup: Want a Law Job? Learn the Health-Care Act</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/wsj/law/feed/~3/m-SkoBonOns/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2013/06/17/the-am-roundup-want-a-law-job-learn-the-health-care-act/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2013 12:33:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jacob Gershman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Affordable Care Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anthony D. Marshall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[asbestos litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facial recognition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internal Revenue Service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Karkoc]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.wsj.com/law/?p=45085</guid>
		<description>Law Blog rounds up the morning's news.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/wsj/law/feed/~4/m-SkoBonOns" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2013/06/17/the-am-roundup-want-a-law-job-learn-the-health-care-act/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2013/06/17/the-am-roundup-want-a-law-job-learn-the-health-care-act/?mod=WSJBlog</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Supreme Court Could Add More Big Cases Amid Opinion Frenzy</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/wsj/law/feed/~3/GiaoEymI_t8/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2013/06/14/supreme-court-could-add-more-big-cases-amid-opinion-frenzy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jun 2013 23:18:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brent Kendall</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[housing discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recess appointments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scotus]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.wsj.com/law/?p=45079</guid>
		<description>While the country waits for the Supreme Court to rule on gay marriage, affirmative action and voting rights, the justices are continuing to fill in the docket for the court’s next term, and several closely watched cases are looming.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/wsj/law/feed/~4/GiaoEymI_t8" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2013/06/14/supreme-court-could-add-more-big-cases-amid-opinion-frenzy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<category>PAID</category>\n	<feedburner:origLink>http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2013/06/14/supreme-court-could-add-more-big-cases-amid-opinion-frenzy/?mod=WSJBlog</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Big Law Firms Tackle Employment Suits</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/wsj/law/feed/~3/Ju5_8DV3PE8/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2013/06/14/big-law-reaches-settlement-in-discrimination-case-sued-in-another/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jun 2013 23:00:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chad Bray</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Lawyers & Law Firms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[age discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[civil litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[disability benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gender discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law firms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawyers and law firms]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.wsj.com/law/?p=45078</guid>
		<description>There have been two new developments on the employment litigation front involving Big Law this week.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/wsj/law/feed/~4/Ju5_8DV3PE8" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2013/06/14/big-law-reaches-settlement-in-discrimination-case-sued-in-another/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<category>PAID</category>\n	<feedburner:origLink>http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2013/06/14/big-law-reaches-settlement-in-discrimination-case-sued-in-another/?mod=WSJBlog</feedburner:origLink></item>
	</channel>
</rss>
