<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Crazy in Love</title>
	<atom:link href="https://screenphile.wordpress.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://screenphile.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>Blended thoughts on Film &#38; TV</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 11:03:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">6353425</site><cloud domain='screenphile.wordpress.com' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />

	<atom:link rel="search" type="application/opensearchdescription+xml" href="https://screenphile.wordpress.com/osd.xml" title="Crazy in Love" />
	<atom:link rel='hub' href='https://screenphile.wordpress.com/?pushpress=hub'/>
	<item>
		<title>Shutting Up Shop</title>
		<link>https://screenphile.wordpress.com/2009/07/01/shutting-up-shop/</link>
					<comments>https://screenphile.wordpress.com/2009/07/01/shutting-up-shop/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[aulelia]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 11:03:28 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenphile.wordpress.com/?p=65</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hi everyone, Thanks to everyone who has read or subscribed to this blog. I am shutting it down because I don&#8217;t have the time to devote to it anymore. Please come and visit my normal blog, Charcoal Ink, or my blog about Beyonce for more of my writing. Cheers, Aulelia]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi everyone,</p>
<p>Thanks to everyone who has read or subscribed to this blog. I am shutting it down because I don&#8217;t have the time to devote to it anymore.</p>
<p>Please come and visit my normal blog, <a href="http://www.charcoalink.wordpress.com" target="_blank">Charcoal Ink</a>, or <a href="http://www.purebeyonce.wordpress.com" target="_blank">my blog about Beyonce </a>for more of my writing.</p>
<p>Cheers,</p>
<p>Aulelia</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://screenphile.wordpress.com/2009/07/01/shutting-up-shop/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">65</post-id>
		<media:content url="https://0.gravatar.com/avatar/312d8fe8d3a71b1c6685c5f4d7964bf77aba73e75b9c92eb84158d8b532d76db?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">aulelia</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Music Videos Still Matter: Thoughts on Single Ladies</title>
		<link>https://screenphile.wordpress.com/2009/04/05/music-videos-still-matter-thoughts-on-single-ladies/</link>
					<comments>https://screenphile.wordpress.com/2009/04/05/music-videos-still-matter-thoughts-on-single-ladies/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[aulelia]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2009 15:28:08 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music Videos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Single Ladies]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenphile.wordpress.com/?p=62</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[As you may have noticed from title of this blog, I am a Beyoncé fan. Sure, she is an R&#38;B pop hybrid, and she has many haters (as per usual for successful black singers) but I am not one of them. She set YouTube alight with Single Ladies, her black &#38; white homage to Fosse-esque [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As you may have noticed from title of this blog, I am a Beyoncé fan. Sure, she is an R&amp;B pop hybrid, and she has many haters (as per usual for successful black singers) but I am not one of them. She set <em>YouTube</em> alight with <em>Single Ladie</em>s, her black &amp; white homage to Fosse-esque dancing with loads of J-Setting. The video on her YouTube channel has almost 50 million views since it premiered last autumn.</p>
<p>I gave it a go below with the video. My dancing is pretty awful, but I will prove my point with it.<span id="more-62"></span></p>
<iframe class="youtube-player" width="480" height="270" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/t2C_Gh9C0Kk?version=3&#038;rel=1&#038;showsearch=0&#038;showinfo=1&#038;iv_load_policy=1&#038;fs=1&#038;hl=en&#038;autohide=2&#038;wmode=transparent" allowfullscreen="true" style="border:0;" sandbox="allow-scripts allow-same-origin allow-popups allow-presentation allow-popups-to-escape-sandbox"></iframe>
<p>Music videos <em>still</em> matter in promoting musicians. They matter on TV and now on the internet. A visual to accompany a song helps flesh out the ideas and strengthen the links between the fan and the artist. Which is why I made the video. I love her music and I always find myself doing random Beyoncé moves when I am out with friends even during the day (and they do look at me like I am mad).</p>
<p>Music videos sell the concept of the artist to the fans as well, so they are useful from a business point of view. Which is why it is alarming that Warner have pulled a lot of their music videos from <em>YouTube</em> itself. In a way, it seems to me like they are cutting of their noses to spite their faces. Music videos promote songs to fans, as well as speaking to fans. It is so obvious yet these music companies are missing the whole point of video on the Internet.</p>
<p>Music videos play an important role of the new face of television on the internet. I will be watching how <em>YouTube </em>develops from a music standpoint closely because unless the music industry realises that videos online are a good thing, they will keep cutting their business models in half.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://screenphile.wordpress.com/2009/04/05/music-videos-still-matter-thoughts-on-single-ladies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">62</post-id>
		<media:content url="https://0.gravatar.com/avatar/312d8fe8d3a71b1c6685c5f4d7964bf77aba73e75b9c92eb84158d8b532d76db?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">aulelia</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Quote of the Month: &#8220;Blood&#8221;/Law &#038; Order/8&#215;07</title>
		<link>https://screenphile.wordpress.com/2009/04/03/quote-of-the-month-bloodlaw-order8x07/</link>
					<comments>https://screenphile.wordpress.com/2009/04/03/quote-of-the-month-bloodlaw-order8x07/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[aulelia]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 19:50:22 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hallmark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law & Order]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law&Order]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenphile.wordpress.com/?p=60</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Just caught this right now as I am watching Law &#38; Order on Hallmark. This episode was called Blood and remarkably is episode 8&#215;07 from 1997. In response to a potential witness who doesn&#8217;t want to talk, Jack McCoy says: People who get in the way of my murder cases get run over! That is [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just caught this right now as I am watching <em>Law &amp; Order</em> on <em>Hallmark</em>. This episode was called Blood and remarkably is episode 8&#215;07 from 1997.</p>
<p>In response to a potential witness who doesn&#8217;t want to talk, Jack McCoy says:</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>People who get in the way of my murder cases get run over!</strong></p></blockquote>
<p>That is a classic McCoy, and <em>Law &amp; Order</em> when it pops and bubbles at its&#8217; best. Hilarious.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://screenphile.wordpress.com/2009/04/03/quote-of-the-month-bloodlaw-order8x07/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">60</post-id>
		<media:content url="https://0.gravatar.com/avatar/312d8fe8d3a71b1c6685c5f4d7964bf77aba73e75b9c92eb84158d8b532d76db?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">aulelia</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ratings Reflections: The Wire gets more spikes</title>
		<link>https://screenphile.wordpress.com/2009/04/01/ratings-reflections-the-wire-gets-more-spikes/</link>
					<comments>https://screenphile.wordpress.com/2009/04/01/ratings-reflections-the-wire-gets-more-spikes/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[aulelia]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 20:59:23 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Ratings Reflections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Wire]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenphile.wordpress.com/?p=54</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Just to put my previous post about The Wire&#8216;s pilot episode on BBC finding 600,000 viewers in more context, I have created a graphic to illustrate just how better it was done on terrestrial, compared to satellite when it was on FX. Links for Data: The Times and The Guardian As you can see, it&#8217;s [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just to put my previous post about <em>The Wire</em>&#8216;s pilot episode on <em>BBC</em> finding 600,000 viewers in more context, I have created a graphic to illustrate just how better it was done on terrestrial, compared to satellite when it was on <em>FX</em>.</p>
<p><a href="https://screenphile.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/wire-graphic-3.png"><img data-attachment-id="57" data-permalink="https://screenphile.wordpress.com/2009/04/01/ratings-reflections-the-wire-gets-more-spikes/wire-graphic-3/" data-orig-file="https://screenphile.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/wire-graphic-3.png" data-orig-size="410,563" data-comments-opened="1" data-image-meta="{&quot;aperture&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;credit&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;camera&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;caption&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;created_timestamp&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;copyright&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;focal_length&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;iso&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;shutter_speed&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;title&quot;:&quot;&quot;}" data-image-title="wire-graphic-3" data-image-description="" data-image-caption="" data-large-file="https://screenphile.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/wire-graphic-3.png?w=410" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-57" title="wire-graphic-3" src="https://screenphile.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/wire-graphic-3.png?w=480" alt="wire-graphic-3"   srcset="https://screenphile.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/wire-graphic-3.png 410w, https://screenphile.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/wire-graphic-3.png?w=109&amp;h=150 109w, https://screenphile.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/wire-graphic-3.png?w=218&amp;h=300 218w" sizes="(max-width: 410px) 100vw, 410px" /></a></p>
<p>Links for Data: <a href="http://entertainment.timesonline.co.uk/tol/arts_and_entertainment/tv_and_radio/article5982027.ece" target="_blank">The Times </a>and <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2009/mar/31/the-wire-bbc2-ratings" target="_blank">The Guardian</a></p>
<p>As you can see, it&#8217;s an increase of <strong>470,000</strong> viewers, pure and simple from terrestrial. God knows why it took the Beeb so long to acquire the normal rights.</p>
<p>The third episode of the first series is back on tonight at 23.20 on <em>BBC1</em>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://screenphile.wordpress.com/2009/04/01/ratings-reflections-the-wire-gets-more-spikes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">54</post-id>
		<media:content url="https://0.gravatar.com/avatar/312d8fe8d3a71b1c6685c5f4d7964bf77aba73e75b9c92eb84158d8b532d76db?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">aulelia</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="https://screenphile.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/wire-graphic-3.png" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">wire-graphic-3</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ratings Reflections: The Wire traps 600,000 viewers</title>
		<link>https://screenphile.wordpress.com/2009/03/31/ratings-reflections-the-wire-traps-600000-viewers/</link>
					<comments>https://screenphile.wordpress.com/2009/03/31/ratings-reflections-the-wire-traps-600000-viewers/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[aulelia]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 22:01:20 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Ratings Reflections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Wire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenphile.wordpress.com/?p=52</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Best ratings ever for the show in the UK, after it was shown on BBC. The Guardian said: The Wire attracted a respectable 8% share of the total TV audience last night between 11.20pm and 12.20am on BBC2, according to unofficial overnights. &#8216;Respectable&#8217; &#8211; those are great numbers for such a small show, that no [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2009/mar/31/the-wire-bbc2-ratings" target="_blank">Best ratings ever for the show in the UK, after it was shown on BBC. </a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2009/mar/31/the-wire-bbc2-ratings" target="_blank"><em>The Guardian</em> </a>said:</p>
<blockquote><p><em>The Wire attracted a respectable 8% share of the total TV audience last night between 11.20pm and 12.20am on BBC2, according to unofficial overnights.</em></p></blockquote>
<p>&#8216;Respectable&#8217; &#8211; those are great numbers for such a small show, that no one barely saw when it came out. I will be interested to see what happens next week, whether they can build on those numbers, like how Law &amp; Order UK has.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://screenphile.wordpress.com/2009/03/31/ratings-reflections-the-wire-traps-600000-viewers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">52</post-id>
		<media:content url="https://0.gravatar.com/avatar/312d8fe8d3a71b1c6685c5f4d7964bf77aba73e75b9c92eb84158d8b532d76db?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">aulelia</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ratings Reflections: The Apprentice takes 8.1m wickets&#8230;</title>
		<link>https://screenphile.wordpress.com/2009/03/26/ratings-reflections-the-apprentice-takes-81m-wickets/</link>
					<comments>https://screenphile.wordpress.com/2009/03/26/ratings-reflections-the-apprentice-takes-81m-wickets/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[aulelia]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 18:10:38 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Ratings Reflections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sir Alan Sugar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Apprentice]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenphile.wordpress.com/?p=48</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[Image Source: Flickr/Uploaded by jovike/Creative Commons Licence Approved by Attribution] &#8230;well, of course, I mean viewers! But they may as well have taken wickets because that is a fantastic start to the series. 8.1m! Just phenomenal. If we consider that Dancing on Ice was averaging about 9m in the middle when it hit its&#8217; groove, [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img data-attachment-id="47" data-permalink="https://screenphile.wordpress.com/2009/03/26/ratings-reflections-the-apprentice-takes-81m-wickets/surallan1/" data-orig-file="https://screenphile.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/surallan1.jpg" data-orig-size="375,500" data-comments-opened="1" data-image-meta="{&quot;aperture&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;credit&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;camera&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;caption&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;created_timestamp&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;copyright&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;focal_length&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;iso&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;shutter_speed&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;title&quot;:&quot;&quot;}" data-image-title="surallan1" data-image-description="" data-image-caption="" data-large-file="https://screenphile.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/surallan1.jpg?w=375" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-47" title="surallan1" src="https://screenphile.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/surallan1.jpg?w=480" alt="surallan1"   srcset="https://screenphile.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/surallan1.jpg 375w, https://screenphile.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/surallan1.jpg?w=113&amp;h=150 113w, https://screenphile.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/surallan1.jpg?w=225&amp;h=300 225w" sizes="(max-width: 375px) 100vw, 375px" /></p>
<p><em>[Image Source: Flickr/Uploaded by </em><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/jvk/101851683/sizes/m/" target="_blank"><em>jovike</em></a><em>/Creative Commons Licence Approved by Attribution]</em></p>
<p>&#8230;well, of course, I mean viewers! But <a href="http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/tv/a150782/apprentice-return-sets-new-record.html" target="_blank">they may as well have taken wickets because that is a fantastic start to the series</a>. <strong>8.1m</strong>! Just phenomenal. If we consider that <em>Dancing on Ice</em> was averaging about 9m in the middle when it hit its&#8217; groove, the controllers at the BBC should be very pleased.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://screenphile.wordpress.com/2009/03/26/ratings-reflections-the-apprentice-takes-81m-wickets/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">48</post-id>
		<media:content url="https://0.gravatar.com/avatar/312d8fe8d3a71b1c6685c5f4d7964bf77aba73e75b9c92eb84158d8b532d76db?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">aulelia</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="https://screenphile.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/surallan1.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">surallan1</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Episode Review: The Apprentice/Series 5&#215;01</title>
		<link>https://screenphile.wordpress.com/2009/03/25/episode-review-the-apprenticeseries-5x01/</link>
					<comments>https://screenphile.wordpress.com/2009/03/25/episode-review-the-apprenticeseries-5x01/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[aulelia]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 22:19:45 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alan Sugar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apprentice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Burnett]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sir Alan Sugar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Apprentice UK]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UK]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenphile.wordpress.com/?p=43</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s back. If you live under a rock, you probably do not know what it means. Million Dollar Traders came before it in February, Comic Relief giving it the celebrity push just before the launch. Oh yes, I am talking about The Apprentice (TA hereafter). The first episode of the 5th series premiered just now [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s back.</p>
<p>If you live under a rock, you probably do not know what it means. <em>Million Dollar Traders</em> came before it in February, <em>Comic Relief</em> giving it the celebrity push just before the launch. Oh yes, I am talking about <em>The Apprentice</em> (TA hereafter).</p>
<p>The first episode of the 5th series premiered just now at 21.00hrs. TA never disappoints because it always has the same punchy formula: Sir Alan&#8217;s joke phrases, Nick &amp; Margaret&#8217;s biting comments alongside arrogant inflated egos of the candidates, vying for the job Tim, Michelle used to have. It&#8217;s fantastic to watch because it does exactly what it says on the tin.</p>
<p>This first episode of the franchise, created by British TV executive Mark Burnett, saw the candidates setting up a cleaning service. Naturally, there were so many explosions of not the right sort. Candidates already standing out for me are Mona (Tanzania baby!) and Deborah who did not get along whilst being on the same team.</p>
<p><em>Verdict: 4 out of 5 Crazy-in-Love choruses &gt; it&#8217;s back, but we have to wait and see if it can top last years fabulous series. </em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://screenphile.wordpress.com/2009/03/25/episode-review-the-apprenticeseries-5x01/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">43</post-id>
		<media:content url="https://0.gravatar.com/avatar/312d8fe8d3a71b1c6685c5f4d7964bf77aba73e75b9c92eb84158d8b532d76db?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">aulelia</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ratings Reflections: 12 Million Watch Dancing on Ice Final</title>
		<link>https://screenphile.wordpress.com/2009/03/23/ratings-reflections-12-million-watch-dancing-on-ice-final/</link>
					<comments>https://screenphile.wordpress.com/2009/03/23/ratings-reflections-12-million-watch-dancing-on-ice-final/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[aulelia]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 14:49:01 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ratings Reflections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dancing on Ice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Donal MacIntyre]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jessica Taylor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ray Quinn]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenphile.wordpress.com/?p=40</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Donal was robbed, I tell you! X Factor finalist Ray Quinn won Dancing on Ice last night. He was definitely the favourite, with Irish journalist Donal MacIntyre as the underdog who somehow found his way to the final. I enjoy these kitschy, cheesy over the top shows of sparkles and all that nonsense. I think [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Donal was robbed, I tell you!</p>
<p><em>X Factor</em> finalist Ray Quinn won <em>Dancing on Ice</em> last night. He was definitely the favourite, with Irish journalist Donal MacIntyre as the underdog who somehow found his way to the final.</p>
<p>I enjoy these kitschy, cheesy over the top shows of sparkles and all that nonsense. I think shows like <em>X Factor</em> &amp; <em>Dancing on Ice</em> are just fantastic! I can&#8217;t pretend &#8211; I watched the whole final from 18.55-21.00. And who can forget Todd Carty coming out for one final skate too? Love it!</p>
<p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2009/mar/23/tv-ratings-chris-moyles-quiz-night" target="_blank">The Guardian has reported that 12 million people </a>watched the final towards the end of the segment. Those are amazing ratings, whatever way you look at it. Sunday night is clearly a good slot for the show.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://screenphile.wordpress.com/2009/03/23/ratings-reflections-12-million-watch-dancing-on-ice-final/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">40</post-id>
		<media:content url="https://0.gravatar.com/avatar/312d8fe8d3a71b1c6685c5f4d7964bf77aba73e75b9c92eb84158d8b532d76db?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">aulelia</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>More Musings on 30 Rock &#038; Five USA&#8217;s Nonsense</title>
		<link>https://screenphile.wordpress.com/2009/03/21/more-musings-on-30-rock-five-usas-nonsense/</link>
					<comments>https://screenphile.wordpress.com/2009/03/21/more-musings-on-30-rock-five-usas-nonsense/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[aulelia]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 14:05:18 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[30 Rock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alec Baldwin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jane Krakakowski]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Series 2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tina Fey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tracy Morgan]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenphile.wordpress.com/?p=38</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[30 Rock: There is this insider&#8217;s TV blog called Complications Ensue that I found randomly one day. I&#8217;m studying to be a journalist so I have no desire to work in TV but I am a *massive* TV freak. It&#8217;s an interesting blog written by a TV writer, Alex Epstein, who clearly is an expert [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>30 Rock:</strong> There is this insider&#8217;s TV blog called <a href="http://complicationsensue.blogspot.com" target="_blank">Complications Ensue </a>that I found randomly one day. I&#8217;m studying to be a journalist so I have no desire to work in TV but I am a *massive* TV freak. It&#8217;s an interesting blog written by a TV writer, Alex Epstein, who clearly is an expert in the field of television.</p>
<p>When I was looking through the archives of this blog, I realised that the writer was not wild about shows I am a fanatic about like <em>30 Rock</em>, then <a href="http://complicationsensue.blogspot.com/2007/10/plussing.html" target="_blank">I found this post</a>. I had no idea 30 Rock had &#8216;plussing&#8217; as Epstein calls, which is, according to him when:</p>
<blockquote><p>adding additional funny material to a scene that&#8217;s already funny.</p></blockquote>
<p>This is why I think <strong>30 Rock</strong> is so fantastic. I noticed it in the first series that the characters always had funny little extra things that they did. It always made me crease because as a viewer, it makes you realise how detailed the comedy is because you have to concentrate or you will miss the subtle jokes.</p>
<p>I am slightly confused with the route they are going for in the second series. I watched the new second series episodes last night on Five USA. They were better than last week&#8217;s episodes but I am starting to feel like the show has changed in that, it is more self-conscious. I know that it was critically lauded in the US with the first series but found it hard to break into the mainstream with a larger audience. I suspect that Tina has probably changed certain things to make it more mainstream but naturally, this does take away from the magic of the first series.</p>
<p>I will know for sure of my reservations when I watch next week&#8217;s episodes. I still think the show is great, but maybe it is trying to find its&#8217; feet with the second series. Which brings me to&#8230;</p>
<p><strong>Five USA:</strong> According to the irritating voice-over I heard last night after the episodes, 30 Rock is being moved to being at 10pm &amp; 10.30pm instead of the 9pm slot. Again, Five USA are just not confident with the show. Maybe they have pushed it forward to catch more younger people but I just don&#8217;t understand why they cannot promote the show properly. It&#8217;s not pass the parcel &#8211; it&#8217;s a show that can be commercially successful if Five know what they are doing.</p>
<p>Like I said before, Dexter is successful (1 million viewers on ITV!) and it only has 12 episodes, whereas 30 Rock has more than 20 episodes yet numbers just in the thousands. Five need to think hard about what they are going to do.</p>
<p><em>NB: The best 30 Rock fansite I have found so far is <a href="www.pregnantcornbread.com" target="_blank">Pregnant Cornbread</a>. Any hardcore 30 Rock fans will understand the hilarious title. </em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://screenphile.wordpress.com/2009/03/21/more-musings-on-30-rock-five-usas-nonsense/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">38</post-id>
		<media:content url="https://0.gravatar.com/avatar/312d8fe8d3a71b1c6685c5f4d7964bf77aba73e75b9c92eb84158d8b532d76db?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">aulelia</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Crazy-in-Love Screen Links</title>
		<link>https://screenphile.wordpress.com/2009/03/20/crazy-in-love-screen-links/</link>
					<comments>https://screenphile.wordpress.com/2009/03/20/crazy-in-love-screen-links/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[aulelia]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 22:40:08 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Required Reading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Big Brother]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Red Riding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vanessa Williams]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://screenphile.wordpress.com/?p=34</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A collection of screen-related links: Monie has written a summary of Vanessa Williams&#8217; (Ugly Betty) career. Broadcast revealed that Red Riding, the critically lauded Channel 4 trilogy, closed with around 1.7m viewers, citing that show was watched by mostly females &#38; ABC1s. Must be the Sean Bean factor. I won&#8217;t pretend, he had me watching! [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A collection of screen-related links:</p>
<ul>
<li>Monie has written a summary of <a href="http://monieontheoutside.blogspot.com/2009/03/retro-beaute-vanessa-williams.html" target="_blank">Vanessa Williams&#8217; (<strong>Ugly Betty</strong>) career</a>.</li>
<li><em>Broadcast</em> revealed that <strong>Red Riding</strong>, the critically lauded Channel 4 trilogy, <a href="http://www.broadcastnow.co.uk/news/terrestrial/2009/03/red_riding_closes_with_17m.html" target="_blank">closed with around 1.7m viewers</a>, citing that show was watched by mostly females &amp; ABC1s. Must be the Sean Bean factor. I won&#8217;t pretend, he had me watching!</li>
<li><em>Variety</em> learns that the Brazilian version of <strong>Big Brother</strong> will make circa <a href="http://www.variety.com/article/VR1118001413.html?categoryid=14&amp;cs=1" target="_blank">$125m </a>from advertisements alone. I can&#8217;t even think of a smoking hot pun to accompany this. That&#8217;s a lot of dosh!</li>
<li>Cammie says he&#8217;d freeze the licence fee for BBC because of &#8216;tough times&#8217;, <a href="http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/cameron-would-freeze-bbc-fee-1646289.html" target="_blank">according to The Indy</a>. Okay Dave, but then how will the Beeb make money and even more, how will you fund me watching BBC3?</li>
</ul>
<p><em>[Sources cited: Variety, Monie on the Outside, The Independent, &amp; Broadcast]</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://screenphile.wordpress.com/2009/03/20/crazy-in-love-screen-links/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">34</post-id>
		<media:content url="https://0.gravatar.com/avatar/312d8fe8d3a71b1c6685c5f4d7964bf77aba73e75b9c92eb84158d8b532d76db?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">aulelia</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
