<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Uncommon Descent</title>
	<atom:link href="http://uncommondescent.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://uncommondescent.com</link>
	<description>Serving The Intelligent Design Community</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Oct 2024 17:09:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>A Farewell and Remembrance</title>
		<link>https://uncommondescent.com/news/a-farewell-and-remembrance/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[William Dembski]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Apr 2023 20:52:41 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://uncommondescent.com/?p=128977</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Uncommon Descent began&#160;in the summer of 2005&#160;as my personal blog.&#160;Before that, I had a personal website, designinference.com. The latter site began in 2002 and was a place for my longer writings. But by 2005, blogging was the rage, and I jumped in with both feet at Uncommon Descent. The very name was at once a play on Darwin&#8217;s idea of common descent, but also a play on descent being a homophone of dissent. In 2004, I had edited an anthology for the Intercollegiate Studies Institute titled Uncommon Dissent, so the name Uncommon Descent tied in with my then current interests and activities. And it clearly called to mind that living organisms have an origin beyond the naturalistic causes of Darwinism, indeed,<a class="ellipsis article-more" href="https://uncommondescent.com/news/a-farewell-and-remembrance/"><span> Read More &#8250;</span></a>]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bird Flight Automaton</title>
		<link>https://uncommondescent.com/biomimicry/bird-flight-automaton/</link>
					<comments>https://uncommondescent.com/biomimicry/bird-flight-automaton/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[kairosfocus]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2023 16:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Biomimicry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[specified complexity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bad design?]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bio-engineering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Computing, AI, Cybernetics and Mechatronics]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://uncommondescent.com/?p=129288</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Let&#8217;s just watch: Notice, just the flapping, using gears and links [far simpler than the real bird]: Amazing. END]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://uncommondescent.com/biomimicry/bird-flight-automaton/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dragonfly Ornithopters</title>
		<link>https://uncommondescent.com/intelligent-design/dragonfly-ornithopters/</link>
					<comments>https://uncommondescent.com/intelligent-design/dragonfly-ornithopters/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[kairosfocus]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2023 14:25:05 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Academic Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fine tuning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intelligent Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[specified complexity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bio-engineering]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://uncommondescent.com/?p=129278</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[As fans of Dune will readily see, an ornithopter is a flapping wing flying machine, as a helicopter is a rotary wing flying machine. Where of course we have seen how Dragonflies are elliptical winged insects capable of up to 56 km/h speed. They also have pterostigmas that control flutter, gaining up to 25% speed [in gliding mode]. Then, there are airflow and wing flex sensors that indicate sophisticated, highly tuned control loop networks. These insects are capable of forward and reverse flight, hovering and sideways flight. They also have up to 97% success rate in predation. Such a natural model will of course inspire engineers. So, we can see here, a Dragonfly robot ornithopter: A clip: Resemblance to a<a class="ellipsis article-more" href="https://uncommondescent.com/intelligent-design/dragonfly-ornithopters/"><span> Read More &#8250;</span></a>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://uncommondescent.com/intelligent-design/dragonfly-ornithopters/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dragon Fly Wings also have air flow and wing deformation sensors</title>
		<link>https://uncommondescent.com/intelligent-design/id-foundations/dragon-fly-wings-also-have-air-flow-and-wing-deformation-sensors/</link>
					<comments>https://uncommondescent.com/intelligent-design/id-foundations/dragon-fly-wings-also-have-air-flow-and-wing-deformation-sensors/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[kairosfocus]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Apr 2023 08:28:20 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Fine-timing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ID Foundations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Back to Basics of ID]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://uncommondescent.com/?p=129273</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The Dragonfly is amazing: As Fabian et al summarise: Animal wings deform during ﬂight in ways that can enhance lift, facilitate ﬂight control, and mitigate damage. Monitoring the structural and aerodynamic stateof the wing is challenging because deformations are passive, and the ﬂow ﬁeldsare unsteady; it requires distributed mechanosensors that respond to localairﬂow and strain on the wing. Without a complete map of the sensor arrays, itis impossible to model control strategies underpinned by them. Here, we presentthe ﬁrst systematic characterization of mechanosensors on the dragonﬂy’s wings:morphology, distribution, and wiring. By combining a cross-species survey ofsensor distribution with quantitative neuroanatomy and a high-ﬁdelity ﬁniteelement analysis, we show that the mechanosensors are well placed to perceivefeatures of the wing dynamics relevant<a class="ellipsis article-more" href="https://uncommondescent.com/intelligent-design/id-foundations/dragon-fly-wings-also-have-air-flow-and-wing-deformation-sensors/"><span> Read More &#8250;</span></a>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://uncommondescent.com/intelligent-design/id-foundations/dragon-fly-wings-also-have-air-flow-and-wing-deformation-sensors/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>L&#038;FP, 71: The island of function, fitness peak trap</title>
		<link>https://uncommondescent.com/fine-tuning/lfp-71-the-island-of-function-fitness-peak-trap/</link>
					<comments>https://uncommondescent.com/fine-tuning/lfp-71-the-island-of-function-fitness-peak-trap/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[kairosfocus]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Apr 2023 08:51:38 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Fine tuning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Logic and Reason]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[specified complexity]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://uncommondescent.com/?p=129271</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[We have been using a 3-D printer-constructor formalism, and now we can use it to see how hill climbing leads to local trapping. Again, the core formalism: Now, let us modify by allowing some sort of local random mutation to d(E) case by case within an n-run, now seen as a generation, so E1 to En are all incrementally different, and in effect are a ring around E in a fitness landscape. From this, we can see a survival filter that on average selects for superior performance. This leads, naturally to hill-climbing, perhaps even to several related peaks in a chain on an island of function. But now, we see: Here, we see that hill climbing leads to peak trapping,<a class="ellipsis article-more" href="https://uncommondescent.com/fine-tuning/lfp-71-the-island-of-function-fitness-peak-trap/"><span> Read More &#8250;</span></a>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://uncommondescent.com/fine-tuning/lfp-71-the-island-of-function-fitness-peak-trap/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>239</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>L&#038;FP, 70: Exploring cosmological fine tuning using the idea of a 3-D, universal printer and constructor (also, islands of function)</title>
		<link>https://uncommondescent.com/fine-tuning/lfp-70-exploring-cosmological-fine-tuning-using-the-idea-of-a-3-d-universal-printer-and-constructor-also-islands-of-function/</link>
					<comments>https://uncommondescent.com/fine-tuning/lfp-70-exploring-cosmological-fine-tuning-using-the-idea-of-a-3-d-universal-printer-and-constructor-also-islands-of-function/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[kairosfocus]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Mar 2023 11:31:27 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Academic Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Astronomy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fine tuning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Logic and Reason]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://uncommondescent.com/?p=129258</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Last time, we looked at how Kolmogorov Complexity can be used to quantify the information in functionally specific complex organisation, by using the formal idea of a 3-D universal printer and constructor, 3-DP/C: . . . it is but a short step to imagine a universal constructor device which, fed a compact description in a suitable language, will construct and present the [obviously, finite] object. Let us call this the universal 3-D printer/constructor, 3-DP/C. Thus, in principle, reduction of an organised entity to a description in a suitably compact language is formally equivalent in information terms to the object, once 3-DP/C is present as a conceptual entity. So, WLOG, reduction to compact description in a compact language d(E) is readily<a class="ellipsis article-more" href="https://uncommondescent.com/fine-tuning/lfp-70-exploring-cosmological-fine-tuning-using-the-idea-of-a-3-d-universal-printer-and-constructor-also-islands-of-function/"><span> Read More &#8250;</span></a>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://uncommondescent.com/fine-tuning/lfp-70-exploring-cosmological-fine-tuning-using-the-idea-of-a-3-d-universal-printer-and-constructor-also-islands-of-function/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>89</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>L&#038;FP, 69: A way to understand Functionally Specific Complex Organisation and/or associated Information [FSCO/I] i/l/o Kolmogorov-Chaitin Complexity</title>
		<link>https://uncommondescent.com/fine-tuning/lfp-69-a-way-to-understand-functionally-specific-complex-organisation-and-or-associated-information-fsco-i-i-l-o-kolmogorov-chaitin-complexity/</link>
					<comments>https://uncommondescent.com/fine-tuning/lfp-69-a-way-to-understand-functionally-specific-complex-organisation-and-or-associated-information-fsco-i-i-l-o-kolmogorov-chaitin-complexity/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[kairosfocus]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2023 13:33:58 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Fine tuning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ID Foundations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Information theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Logic and Reason]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[specified complexity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Back to Basics of ID]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://uncommondescent.com/?p=129252</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[It seems that it is exceedingly hard for some to understand what FSCO/I is about. In responding to an objector, I wrote as follows just now, and think it is worth headlining for reference: Where, K-Complexity is summarised by Wikipedia, as a first level point of reference that would have been immediately accessible all along: &#60;&#60;In algorithmic information theory (a subfield of computer science and mathematics), the Kolmogorov complexity of an object, such as a piece of text, is the length of a shortest computer program (in a predetermined programming language) that produces the object as output. It is a measure of the computational resources needed to specify the object, and is also known as algorithmic complexity, Solomonoff–Kolmogorov–Chaitin complexity, program-size<a class="ellipsis article-more" href="https://uncommondescent.com/fine-tuning/lfp-69-a-way-to-understand-functionally-specific-complex-organisation-and-or-associated-information-fsco-i-i-l-o-kolmogorov-chaitin-complexity/"><span> Read More &#8250;</span></a>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://uncommondescent.com/fine-tuning/lfp-69-a-way-to-understand-functionally-specific-complex-organisation-and-or-associated-information-fsco-i-i-l-o-kolmogorov-chaitin-complexity/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>118</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>L&#038;FP, 68: Cognitive Dissonance and fallacies of projection etc</title>
		<link>https://uncommondescent.com/logic-and-reason/lfp-68-cognitive-dissonance-and-fallacies-of-projection-etc/</link>
					<comments>https://uncommondescent.com/logic-and-reason/lfp-68-cognitive-dissonance-and-fallacies-of-projection-etc/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[kairosfocus]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2023 20:03:35 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Agitprop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defending our Civilization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Logic and Reason]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://uncommondescent.com/?p=129249</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[It is a sub-study of logic, to address fallacies. Accordingly, as it has come up, it seems helpful to highlight cognitive dissonance and certain associated fallacies. First, [HT: Montecinos et al, fair use] here is a recent framework for cognitive dissonance: This is a simple but powerful model. As an example, it has been argued that certain free trial period software, by involving the user in considerable effort to register and use the product, then shifts attitudes towards reluctance to give up the product. Of course, many attitude, thought, belief or behaviour changes can be influenced by the need to reduce inner pain, and some of these are more justifiable in the cold light of day than others. However, some<a class="ellipsis article-more" href="https://uncommondescent.com/logic-and-reason/lfp-68-cognitive-dissonance-and-fallacies-of-projection-etc/"><span> Read More &#8250;</span></a>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://uncommondescent.com/logic-and-reason/lfp-68-cognitive-dissonance-and-fallacies-of-projection-etc/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>23</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>L&#038;FP, 67: So-called &#8220;critical rationalism&#8221; and the blunder of denying [defeat-able] warrant for knowledge</title>
		<link>https://uncommondescent.com/academic-freedom/lfp-67-so-called-critical-rationalism-and-he-blunder-of-denying-defeat-able-warrant-for-knowledge/</link>
					<comments>https://uncommondescent.com/academic-freedom/lfp-67-so-called-critical-rationalism-and-he-blunder-of-denying-defeat-able-warrant-for-knowledge/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[kairosfocus]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Mar 2023 12:46:19 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Academic Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Agitprop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[knowledge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Logic and Reason]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://uncommondescent.com/?p=129243</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[IEP summarises: “Critical Rationalism” is the name Karl Popper (1902-1994) gave to a modest and self-critical rationalism. He contrasted this view with “uncritical or comprehensive rationalism,” the received justificationist view that only what can be proved by reason and/or experience should be accepted. Popper argued that comprehensive rationalism cannot explain how proof is possible and that it leads to inconsistencies. Critical rationalism today is the project of extending Popper’s approach to all areas of thought and action. In each field the central task of critical rationalism is to replace allegedly justificatory methods with critical ones. A common summary of this is that it replaces knowledge as justified, true belief, with &#8220;knowledge is unjustified untrue unbelief.&#8221; That is, we see here<a class="ellipsis article-more" href="https://uncommondescent.com/academic-freedom/lfp-67-so-called-critical-rationalism-and-he-blunder-of-denying-defeat-able-warrant-for-knowledge/"><span> Read More &#8250;</span></a>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://uncommondescent.com/academic-freedom/lfp-67-so-called-critical-rationalism-and-he-blunder-of-denying-defeat-able-warrant-for-knowledge/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>209</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Darwin a slavery abolitionist? Aw, come on!</title>
		<link>https://uncommondescent.com/intelligent-design/darwin-a-slavery-abolitionist-aw-come-on/</link>
					<comments>https://uncommondescent.com/intelligent-design/darwin-a-slavery-abolitionist-aw-come-on/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[News]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2023 14:15:41 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Darwinism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intelligent Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charles Darwin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[slavery]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://uncommondescent.com/?p=129239</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Luther College prof Robert F. Shedinger takes a critical look at Evolution News.]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://uncommondescent.com/intelligent-design/darwin-a-slavery-abolitionist-aw-come-on/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>32</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Give Dawkins credit for guts: He is taking on the “gender” claims</title>
		<link>https://uncommondescent.com/biology/give-dawkins-credit-for-guts-he-is-taking-on-the-gender-claims/</link>
					<comments>https://uncommondescent.com/biology/give-dawkins-credit-for-guts-he-is-taking-on-the-gender-claims/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[News]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2023 13:47:45 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Biology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intelligent Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Piers Morgan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Dawkins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transgender lobby]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://uncommondescent.com/?p=129236</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[He will at least get to experience the world when one is not part of the In crowd.]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://uncommondescent.com/biology/give-dawkins-credit-for-guts-he-is-taking-on-the-gender-claims/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>21</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Of Dragonflies, Spitfires and Elliptical Wings</title>
		<link>https://uncommondescent.com/intelligent-design/of-dragonflies-spitfires-and-elliptical-wings/</link>
					<comments>https://uncommondescent.com/intelligent-design/of-dragonflies-spitfires-and-elliptical-wings/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[kairosfocus]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Mar 2023 18:45:36 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Intelligent Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bad design?]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://uncommondescent.com/?p=129224</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The Dragonfly is a marvel of nature, rated to be one of the all time most effective predators. Similarly, the Spitfire was a breakthrough, fighter-interceptor in the skies over Britain, just under eighty-three years ago. And, oddly, both share a common design feature, elliptical wings: This is of course an interesting convergence of natural and human technologies. Though, the advantages are with the Dragonfly, a natural helicopter. The Spitfire&#8217;s wings: (More details, here.) U/D, Mar 23: Note the clipped wings and radial engine of the Hawker Sea Fury (many later Spitfires also had clipped wings): Notice, the P-47: also, the MiG 15, showing where onward technological evolution would go: The Dragonfly: It&#8217;s worth noting on the Pterostigma, a counterweight often<a class="ellipsis article-more" href="https://uncommondescent.com/intelligent-design/of-dragonflies-spitfires-and-elliptical-wings/"><span> Read More &#8250;</span></a>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://uncommondescent.com/intelligent-design/of-dragonflies-spitfires-and-elliptical-wings/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>43</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Stephen Hawking’s co-author: Hawking thought that his Brief History of Time was wrong</title>
		<link>https://uncommondescent.com/intelligent-design/stephen-hawkings-co-author-hawking-thought-that-his-brief-history-of-time-was-wrong/</link>
					<comments>https://uncommondescent.com/intelligent-design/stephen-hawkings-co-author-hawking-thought-that-his-brief-history-of-time-was-wrong/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[News]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Mar 2023 13:15:18 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Cosmology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Darwinism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intelligent Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brief History of Time (Bantam 1988)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[On the Origin of Time (Penguin 2023)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Hawking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thomas Hertog]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://uncommondescent.com/?p=129218</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[But doesn’t self-organization of the universe, as is now suggested, entail some sort of panpsychism?]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://uncommondescent.com/intelligent-design/stephen-hawkings-co-author-hawking-thought-that-his-brief-history-of-time-was-wrong/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>If two snowflakes are identical, does that increase information?</title>
		<link>https://uncommondescent.com/intelligent-design/if-two-snowflakes-are-identical-does-that-increase-information/</link>
					<comments>https://uncommondescent.com/intelligent-design/if-two-snowflakes-are-identical-does-that-increase-information/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[News]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Mar 2023 12:12:18 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Information theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intelligent Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[snowflakes]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://uncommondescent.com/?p=129214</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[We asked this question among friends and received a variety of answers.]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://uncommondescent.com/intelligent-design/if-two-snowflakes-are-identical-does-that-increase-information/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Joseph Miller: ChatGPT Still Can’t Process Basic Logic (if God is mentioned)</title>
		<link>https://uncommondescent.com/intelligent-design/joseph-miller-chatgpt-still-cant-process-basic-logic-if-god-is-mentioned/</link>
					<comments>https://uncommondescent.com/intelligent-design/joseph-miller-chatgpt-still-cant-process-basic-logic-if-god-is-mentioned/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[News]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Mar 2023 02:35:21 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Artificial Intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intelligent Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chat-GPT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[J. R. Miller]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://uncommondescent.com/?p=129211</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[As Miller tells it, when tested again in March, ChatGPT could no longer recognize a logically valid argument. Wow. Progress.]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://uncommondescent.com/intelligent-design/joseph-miller-chatgpt-still-cant-process-basic-logic-if-god-is-mentioned/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
