Let me ‘dis’ the local Austin news media.  The 10PM news still says congress is still debating and repeats old news.  CSPAN shows the vote passed at 8:15PM.  Austin still lives in a bubble.  We are very well versed about the Texas football dramas and Austin icon Leslie,  but US news effecting every American takes a back seat.

Wait … Breaking news at 10:44 PM “the House has passed the Health Care Reform Bill…”  OK, better late than never …

CSPAN  House Passes health reform legislation

Today -  The House has passed health reform legislation. They are still voting, but 218 members have voted for the legislation which is the number needed to pass.

MSNBC BREAKING NEWS: House approves Democrats’ bill to overhaul nation’s health insurance system

Triumphant Democrats steered landmark health care legislation to the brink of passage in the House late Saturday night, spurred by a summons from President Barack Obama to “answer the call of history” and expand coverage to millions who lack it.

CBS  House Passes Health Care Reform Bill, 220 – 215

Urges House to “Answer the Call of History” and Pass Health Care Bill; Floor Debate Opens Following Deal on Abortion

CNN House pases health care reform bill

The House of Representatives on Saturday night passed a sweeping health care bill bya vote of 220-215.

Washington Post The House of Representatives on Saturday night passed a sweeping health care bill bya vote of 220-215.

In victory for Dems, landmark reform legislation is approved by final vote of 220 to 215; one Republican, Joseph Cao of Louisiana, supports.

NPR House Passes Health Care Bill

The House of Representatives has passed a sweeping overhaul of the nation’s health care system, clearing a major hurdle in the track toward a final plan.

November 7, 2009

I am writing you on this Saturday night from Washington.  It has been a momentous day.  Finally, after decades of debating how to reform our nation’s health care system, with my strong support, the House of Representatives has just approved the Affordable Health Care for America Act (HR 3962) by a narrow vote of 220 to 215.  As a member of the Ways and Means Health Subcommittee, improving access to affordable health care has been one of my top priorities. Now, we are closer to ensuring that in a country as rich as ours, no American will be denied essential care.

The House bill I helped pass offers important new protections for the insured and important improvements to Medicare.  It enjoys the support of AARP, the American Medical Association, the American Cancer Society, the American Nurses Association, and the Consumers Union.  The uninsured are offered a choice of both a public Medicare-type health insurance plan and private insurance. The public option alternative and some of the other provisions are weaker than what I sought, but it is far superior to the Senate opt-out version. The latter would authorize the State of Texas to deny its uninsured families the right to voluntarily select Medicare-type public insurance as an alternative to private insurance monopolies.

But until President Obama has a strong bill on his desk, hard work remains. The Senate is still a challenge because we really do not have a consistent 60 vote Democratic margin to overcome Republican filibusters. Portions of the bill that are already weak, might yet become weaker.

On this historic occasion, there was so much that I wanted to say on your behalf, but the leadership asked me to use the brief time allocated to rebut Republican claims and their phony substitute.  In short, Republicans would do nothing for 95% of the uninsured and permit insurance monopolies to continue denying coverage for pre-existing conditions. To hear my remarks on the House floor today urging my colleagues to reject their bill and support our historic legislation, click here.

Please continue to let me know how I can assist you with any federal matter.

Sincerely,
Lloyd Doggett

Polarization.  Watching it happen is watching history repeat itself.  American media is focusing on Hasan’s religion more than the cause for his meltdown.   The negligence of the American military to adhere to the precepts of their own American Constitution, First Amendment and take the human condition seriously seems to be ignored by the pre-programmed media. If Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press … then the US Military has failed Congress and the people of the United States.  The American Military Complex is equally responsible for the environment that caused the unnecessary tragedy at Ft Hood.  Failing to enforce the American motto of “Liberty and Justice for All”

Troops’ mental health in spotlight

Civilization has experimented with polarization to achieve goals sought by it’s leaders throughout history. Today, the children of Abraham reach for their ’self-fulfilling’ moment as described by their prophets.  They seek Armageddon to vindicate themselves.  They reach for it using terror.  Pointing their fingers at every crime, associating it with a specific religion allow their followers to fan the flames of hatred.  Each side feels they have exclusive possession of God. Each side feels divinely justified to suppress or destroy in the name of their prophet.  Whatever tipped Hasan over the edge, he just used his religion to justify his actions.  Tragedies don’t JUST happen.  We see Christians harass people every day, especially Muslims.  Anything to justify making another person’s life miserable, demeaning their means of worship, ethnicity, heritage or preference. Abraham is the common patriarch of Judaism, Islam, and Christianity. The infighting among Abraham’s children will make Armageddon happen, as long as each sibling insists it will justify their abominable behavior.

The United States Declaration of Independence: “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed …”  No where in the Declaration or Constitution does it permit radical, self proclaimed “warriors of Jesus” to be exempt from law or the rules founding this country.  Each sibling challenges and taunts the other without regard for collateral damage or consequences.  This is what took place in Kileen Texas.  Bible toting preachers have rallied thoughtless behavior from their congregations and given blessings, in the name of Jesus, to break America’s laws of equal rights.  Conversely, Imams have rallied equally radical behavior in the name of Muhammad.  Rabbis have justified the exclusion of non-jews from the land of their fathers, by quoting old scriptures claiming rights to disputed land from thousands of years ago.  Each child of Abraham has soiled it’s beginnings with extremism, corruption, and flaunting contradictions as truth.

Is Nadal Malik Hasan’s Religion Relevant? by Amy Sullivan

In general, conservatives have held up the shooting as a “we told you so” moment and lectured liberals about the dangers of trusting Muslims, especially in the armed forces. For their part, liberals have insisted Hasan was simply a lunatic whose rampage was unrelated to his religious affiliation and decry attempts to draw a connection as “double standards.”

Religious extremism: the good, the bad, and the deadly Laurence R. Iannaccone Department of Economics, George Mason University, Eli Berman Department of Economics, University of California at San Diego’ Prepared for a special issue of Public Choice on the Political Economy of Terrorism, edited by Charles Rowley.

Adam Smith laid the foundation for the economic analysis of religion in 1776. In The Wealth of Nations, Smith (1965, pp. 740-766) argued that self-interest motivates clergy just as it does secular producers; that market forces constrain churches just as they constrain secular firms; and that the benefits of competition, the burdens of monopoly, and the hazards of government regulation are as real for religion as for any other sector of the economy.

The political economy of freedom, democracy and terrorism PETER KURRILD-KLITGAARD, MOGENS K. JUSTESEN & ROBERT KLEMMENSEN,  Dept. of Political Science and Public Management, University of Southern Denmark

Social Fractionalization, Political Instability, and the Size of Government ANTHONY ANNETT (IMF) Working Paper No. 00/82 Published:  April 1, 2000

This paper explores the relationship between the degree of division or fractionalization of a country’s population (along ethnolinguistic and religious dimensions) and both political instability and government consumption, using a neoclassical growth model. The principal idea is that greater fractionalization, proxying for the degree of conflict in society, leads to political instability, which in turn leads to higher government consumption aimed at placating the opposition. There is also a feedback mechanism whereby the higher consumption leads to less instability as government consumption reduces the risk of losing office. Empirical evidence based on panel estimation supports this hypothesis. [JEL E62, 023]

When countries are heavily divided along ethnic, religious, communal, and regional lines, they are likely to experience bouts of political violence and are prone to the frequent breakdown of law and order. Clearly, serious conflict between competing groups, especially violent conflict, would be harmful to economic growth and the process of development. In such a divided country, can the government use expenditure to appease the competing groups and will this contain the potential conflict?

On The Roots of Religious Fractionalization by Murat Iyigun

RELIGIOUS EXTREMISM – RELIGIOUS RIGHT article collection compiled by Sheila Musaji

A very illuminating series by Professor Steven Yates

• The Four Cardinal Errors That Almost Destroyed America, Part 4, 10-1-09
• The Four Cardinal Errors That Almost Destroyed America, Part 3, 9-17-09
• The Four Cardinal Errors That Almost Destroyed America, Part 2, 9-27-09
• The Four Cardinal Errors That Almost Destroyed America, Part 1, 9-13-09

Looking to Other Religions, and to Atheism, for Clarity in Faith

Colin Powell speech at the University of Oklahoma: “What is the greatest threat facing us now?” Powell asked. “People will say it’s terrorism. But are there any terrorists in the world who can change the American way of life or our political system? No. … The only thing that can really destroy us is us.

We shouldn’t do it to ourselves, and we shouldn’t use fear for political purposes—scaring people to death so they will vote for you, or scaring people to death so that we create a terror-industrial complex.”

We’re spending an enormous amount of money on homeland security, and I think we should spend whatever it takes. But I think we have to be careful that we don’t get so caught up in trying to throw money at the terrorist and counter-terrorist problem that we’re essentially creating an industry that will only exist as long as you keep the terrorist threat pumped up. … Let’s make sure that we are spending money on the right things and not spending money just to spend money.”

The original model for Powell’s statements — President Eisenhower’s 1961 farewell address — was primarily concerned with the threat to a free society of granting “unwarranted influence” over US policy to a “military-industrial complex” of defense contractors and national security think-tanks that might “endanger our liberties or democratic processes.”

Don’t forget Timothy McVeigh was a radical Christian who prayed before he set off the bomb in Oklahoma City.

Shooting Violence: A Reason Why?

The status quo for health insurers is minimalist investment in customers, maximum investment into political influence.  Greasy palms are the face of public health insurance in congress.  Genuine discussion about cost effectiveness and practical application take a back seat to the fears of equity in overall health of this country’s population.

Surprise for organ donors: unexpected medical bills

Austin man who gave kidney to co-worker is one of many who have faced health complications, billing problems.

There is a great big gap in credibility here. Insurance companies play god based on computer models and cost basis.  Whoever you pray to seldom drops money in your hand to pay for life giving treatment.  Unless you are self healing, the miracles of medical technology are for sale only.

The organ donor’s family is never charged for donating. The family is charged for the cost of all final efforts to save your life, and those costs are sometimes misinterpreted as costs related to organ donation. Costs for organ removal go to the transplant recipient.

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Advisory Committee on Organ Transplantation

ACOT further recommends that the following Standards of Disclosure: Elements of Informed Consent be incorporated in the informed consent document given to the potential live organ donor, with specific descriptions that would ensure the donor’s awareness of:

• the purpose of the donation
• the evaluation process — including interviews, examinations, laboratory tests, and other procedures — and the possibility that the potential donor may be found ineligible to donate
• the donation surgical procedure
• the alternative procedures or courses of treatment for potential donor and recipient
• any procedures which are or may be considered to be experimental
• the immediate recovery period and the anticipated post-operative course of care
• the foreseeable risks or discomforts to the potential donor
• the potential psychological effects resulting from the process of donation
• the reported national experience, transplant center and surgeon-specific statistics of donor outcomes, including the possibility that the donor may subsequently experience organ failure and/or disability or death
• the foreseeable risks, discomforts, and survival benefit to the potential recipient
• the reported national experience and transplant center statistics of recipient outcomes, including failure of the donated organ and the possibility of recipient death
• the fact that the potential donor’s participation is voluntary, and may be withdrawn at any time
• the fact that the potential donor may derive a medical benefit by having a previously undetected health problem diagnosed as a result of the evaluation process
• the fact that the potential donor undertakes risk and derives no medical benefit from the operative procedure of donation
• the fact that unforeseen future risks or medical uncertainties may not be identifiable at the time of donation
• the fact that the potential donor may be reimbursed for the personal expenses of travel, housing, and lost wages related to donation
• the prohibition against the donor otherwise receiving any valuable consideration (including monetary or material gain) for agreeing to be a donor
• the fact that the donor’s existing health and disability insurance may not cover the potential long-term costs and medical and psychological consequences of donation
• the fact that the donor’s act of donation may adversely affect the donor’s future eligibility for health, disability, or life insurance
• additional informational resources relating to live organ donation (possibly through the establishment of a separate resources center, as separately recommended)
• the fact that Government approved agencies and contractors will be able to obtain information regarding the donor’s health for life and
• the principles of confidentiality, clarifying that:
  • communication between the donor and the transplant center will remain confidential;
  • a decision by the potential donor not to proceed with the donation will only be disclosed with the consent of the potential donor;
  • the transplant center will share the donor’s identity and other medical information with entities involved in the procurement and transplantation of organs, as well as registries that are legally charged to follow donor outcomes; and
  • confidentiality of all patient information will be maintained in accord with applicable laws and regulations.

Financial Information for Living Donors

The sad state of health service in America overturns national pride and arrogance.  The dream country of the world flaunts its flushing toilets, Walmarts and gas guzzlers while neglecting its public wellness.  The contradictions are glaring and ignored by insurance corporations.  Make the maze of health care so complicated that actual diagnosis and treatment is just out of reach for the retired, unemployed and recently victimized by mortgage con artists.  The America we see today is a land of the lucky and unlucky trying to balance honesty and virtue against survival.  The virtue of organ donation is now marred by the shuffling of “who’s paying for all of this”, not us.  The system has cannibalized itself.  Insurance is the holy grail for Americans who are honest enough to understand that the toxic world we live in makes staying healthy a challenge.  Those lucky enough to have genetics strong enough, to hide potential catastrophic illnesses from insurance scrutiny, will then face the inquisition of combing through life histories looking for “pre-existing conditions” worthy of denial.

This is a different America we face today.  Citizens are no longer in charge.  Media, owned by corporations, imaged by marketers is what feeds information to Americans.  Today, the best advertiser wins.  Right now, it appears the advertisers own more Republicans than Democrats … but that gap is closing.  Yes, any solution will be expensive.  More importantly, an inadequate solution will cost even more.  America’s ability to claim world leadership is being undermined by the fading vestiges of the corporate grabfest.  Corporate executives have the funds to insure their future is paved with gold, along with their personal politicians.  Is this really class warfare?  Why does it look more and more like class warfare?  There are whole segments of American society that still have no clue that they have a role in their own future.  That role was bought and paid for long ago by America’s founding fathers.  Without passing judgement on why America has clueless segments of society, they are the tools used by special interests, because they are easily manipulated, bought or coerced.  The system is rotting from the inside out.  Sick social ethic, sick country.  Other countries see how America treats it’s own.  Other countries see through the deception.  America right now is watching it’s future being played out like a ball game.  Each team has its fans.  But, the stakes are too high.

Coast Guard to review exercise after Potomac security scare

Security incident on Potomac River prompted by “training exercise,” two police sources say Coast Guard told them.

With the nation already on edge and somewhat paranoid on September 11 each year, what is the LAST thing you want to do?  Hold a training exercise and fire shots for an audience of passersby, near one of the casualties of the real 9/11 sites.  CNN:

• Story Highlights
• Obama reportedly left Pentagon about the time incident began
• Coast Guard tries to prevent boat from entering Potomac River secure zone
• Incident occurs near Pentagon, where president was observing 9/11 anniversary
• Coast Guard fires 10 shots, unconfirmed reports say

This distraction would have been a great opportunity for a real terrorist with a real target to go unchallenged.  Interesting that CNN was the only network on top of the story while it was breaking news.

CONGRESSMAN BACHUS STATEMENT ON PRESIDENT OBAMA’S HEALTH CARE ADDRESS

Fines proposed for going without health insurance

WASHINGTON – Americans would be fined up to $3,800 for failing to buy health insurance under a plan that circulated in Congress on Tuesday as divisions among Democrats undercut President Barack Obama’s effort to regain traction on his health care overhaul.

Just as auto coverage is now mandatory in nearly all states, Baucus would require that all Americans get health insurance once the system is overhauled. Penalties for failing to do so would start at $750 a year for individuals and $1,500 for families. Households making more than three times the federal poverty level — about $66,000 for a family of four — would face the maximum fines. For families, it would be $3,800, and for individuals, $950.

Baucus would offer tax credits to help pay premiums for households making up to three times the poverty level, and for small employers paying about average middle-class wages. People working for companies that offer coverage could avoid the fines by signing up.

The fines pose a dilemma for Obama. As a candidate, the president campaigned hard against making health insurance a requirement, and fining people for not getting it.

Is Spencer Bachus a “birther”?

As Obama talked strategy with Democratic leaders at the White House, the one idea that most appeals to his party’s liberal base lost ground in Congress. Prospects for a government-run plan to compete with private insurers sank as a leading moderate Democrat said he could no longer support the idea.

The fast-moving developments put Obama in a box. As a candidate, he opposed fines to force individuals to buy health insurance, and he supported setting up a public insurance plan. On Tuesday, fellow Democrats publicly begged to differ on both ideas.

Congressman Spencer Bachus (R-Alabama) predicts that the Social Security Trust Fund could be running a deficit as early as next year.

“[This development comes] at a time when…the federal government is having to constantly increase spending for [Medicare]; when we’ve expanded SCHIP, which is a children’s healthcare program; when we’ve added new healthcare benefits for the unemployed, all of which jeopardize those who are paying into Medicare and their benefits,” he points out.

Myths and Falsehoods About Health Care Reform

Five myths about health care around the world

Mandatory Health Insurance

The individual mandate is a requirement that all Massachusetts residents over the age of 18, for whom available health insurance is affordable, obtain and maintain health insurance that meets minimum coverage requirements beginning July 1, 2007.

Individuals who cannot show proof of health insurance coverage by Dec. 31, 2007, will lose their personal income tax exemption when filing their 2007 income taxes.   The 2006 personal exemption is $3,850 for an individual, which translates into a tax savings of approximately $204 for an individual (5.3 percent of $3,850).

Failure to meet the requirement in 2008 will result in a fine for each month the individual does not have coverage. The fine will equal 50 percent of the least costly, available insurance premium that meets the standard for creditable coverage.

As long as the hatred of Obama drives the Republican Party, critical issues will never be given a serious debate or consideration.  The hate mongers, so popular during the Bush era, are flailing their arms and blowing fire at real governance.  They shout socialism and communism accusations to blow life back into the embers of the cold war, hoping to  rekindle their own credibility.  They are no longer credible.  Time has passed their relevancy by.  The new terror is the misinformation and disinformaton they spew to plant doubt onto truth.  Truth is always ellusive, but dissing it before it can be vetted is just like the mis informed comment most often told is that in 1899 the head of the U.S. Patent Office sent his resignation to President McKinley urging the closing of the office because “everything that could be invented has been invented.” It’s been told and retold so often that even President Reagan used it in a speech. US patent office closing rumour was a hoax at best and misquote at worst. But as an urban legend it was a hit.  Republicans love to invent legends and claim they are true.  This is what they are doing right now to “get rid of Obama”.  Republicans have put their craziest, most radical, most hateful foot forward again.  Regardless who suffers the most, they just want the “old days” back where whites were supreme and entitled to more than anyone else.  To hell with the rest of us.

Rumor had it that, back in 1899, U.S. Commissioner of Patents Charles H. Duell declared that everything that could be invented had been invented. In actuality, Duell’s supposed comment and his recommendation that the Patent Office be closed down proved an urban myth. Of course, that didn’t prevent the metaphor from being abused by pundits or by presidential speechwriters.

It’s the week before Labor Day, and the Texas Progressive Alliance is hard at work bringing you the best of the Texas blogosphere. Here are this week’s highlights.

The Texas Cloverleaf wonders why only one person showed up to a budget meeting where taxes are being increased in Denton County. No tea bags left?

Neil at Texas Liberal offered the fullest extension of the back of his hand to opponent’s of Houston’s Ashby High Rise.

TXsharon wonders what Governor Perry is thinking to appoint a global warming denier as the highest environmental official in Texas at a time when polling shows Americans support Obama on reducing greenhouse emissions and when the EPA has just confirmed water contaminated with hydraulic fracture fluid. Maybe the question should be: Does Perry think?

South Texas Chisme wants you to know that Medicare is a PUBLIC heath care option. Ciro, stand up. Henry, wise up.

Bay Area Houston has video of Republican Pete Olson punking himself punked at his own town hall meeting while trying to use a sick kid for political gain.

Lightseeker over at TexasKaos insists that we not hold health care reform hostage to solving the Abortion Wars. See this and more in his posting, Abortion Wars, Health care and Private Enterprise.

Off the Kuff analyzed some policy papers from Houston’s leading Mayoral candidates, examining Gene Locke’s crimefighting plan, Annise Parker’s education plan, and Peter Brown’s energy plan.

WCNews at Eye On Williamson posts about The good news health care reform would bring to TX-31 and Williamson County.

Setting a date for the eventual US Senate special election is all about the MoFo, according to PDiddie at Brains and Eggs.

This week, McBlogger asked a very good question… Why do we even care about Joe Lieberman?

At Texas Vox, Citizen Sarah reports on Houston Mayor and Senate Hopeful Bill White’s Energy Security Policy, per his panel at Netroots Nation. Video included.

Teddy at Left of College Station covers the Chet Edwards town hall on health reform live from the Brazos Center, and then shares his thoughts on the town hall, and why a vocal minority is against health care reform. Left of College Station also covers the week in headlines: remembering Senator Ted Kennedy.

The passing of Ted Kennedy may have dealt a blow to progressive humanitarian warriors.  The Senate is missing the most effective voice for the disenfranchised.  From his perch atop the mountain of comfort built by his family, Ted Kennedy used his position to battle legislative discrepancies that short changed the less fortunate.

Ted Kennedy was fortunate enough to outlive his youthful antics.  Redemption came every time he voiced support and fairness for all people.   He added weight to inclusive legislation and condemned exclusive treatment imposed upon America’s diverse population.  There are few legislative voices left with as much credibility and power in the senate.  It will take a group of legislators to carry the heavy torch that Ted Kennedy bore.

Congressman Lloyd Doggett Statement on the Death of Senator Edward M. Kennedy

“A great loss at this critical time in American history. Having worked with Senator Kennedy personally, I am inspired by his lifetime of service. Now, following his leadership, we must redouble our efforts to provide access to affordable, quality healthcare to all Americans now.”

School is starting, and the Texas Progressive Alliance is prepared as always to ace the test. Here is this week’s roundup of blog highlights.

From TXsharon: Woo Hoo! EPA testing has now confirmed wells are contaminated “with various substances connected with gas drilling”–proof that hydraulic fracturing contaminates our drinking water. Even Motley Fool supports the FRAC Act and says industry is “crying wolf.”

Should Texans care about NJ? The Texas Cloverleaf examines why the GOP thinks we should.

CouldBeTrue of South Texas Chisme says a ‘Wise Latina‘ kicks Republican butt once again.

For a long time it has been universally agreed upon that people should engage in end-of-life planning, at least until right-wing pundits made end-of-life planning an easy but incidental target of their battle against health care reform. Xanthippas at Three Wise Men takes aim at these critics, and the very real harm they do to people with their dishonest and partisan attacks.

WCNews at Eye On Williamson shows why everyone must call their Represenatives and Senators because It’s time to end America’s health care emergency.

Off the Kuff spent the week following the Sharon Keller trial. He wasn’t impressed by her defense.

Over at TexasKaos, jaxpagan gets us the scoop on Ted Poe’s Town Hall meeting in a funeral parlor. Snark , with a wicked point!

At McBlogger, Harry Balczak takes a few moments to tell us what he thinks about Whole Foods and it’s ‘health care for all’ hating CEO.

Neil at Texas Liberal is back from a two-week vacation that took him to Chicago, Kenosha, Wisconsin, Indianapolis, Cincinnati, Dayton, Ohio and Northern Kentucky. This itinerary is consistent with a post Neil made earlier this summer encouraging folks to visit the industrial midwest. With vacation over, it’s time now to think of school and swine flu. It sure would help if more working people had paid sick days to help manage getting sick themselves and having kids sick at home.

John Coby at Bay Area Houston has some questions to ask Congressman Pete Olson at his town hall mtg on Aug 29.

Some of the very worst of Texas was on full display last week, and PDiddie at Brains and Eggs documented the atrocities.

BossKitty at TruthHugger is still appalled at the chaos and conflict demonstrated by a Bi-Polar America trying to decide Who is Worthy of a Healthy Life and Who is Not.

Why does Al Jazeera see American Politics more clearly than we do?  They see a bi-polar America.  The educated, progressive, inclusive side versus the selfish, dogma chained followers of enigmatic control monger conspiracy enthusiasts.  Equality is an idea that some Americans have distorted into “I am equal, you are not” and “I am entitled, you are not”.  You can see the bi-polar divide by looking at a political map.  Those in rural southern and western states are more inclined to distort religious/political Christian  rhetoric to mean that Jesus does not want the poor, homeless, jobless, and generally unwanted population to have access to the same health care they, themselves enjoy.  By this population’s definition, Jesus would have been a socialist with his arms open wide to include everyone, and they are changing that image.  Contrast that population with the tightly packed cities on the east and west coasts of the USA.  These populations witness or experience health care disparity every day, they see necessity for available health care for the mentally or physically ill among them.  They see disparity with quality of health care dependent on a patient’s income.  The rationing of health care is already a fact of life.  The new reform will remove some of that rationing and make health care a right instead of a privilege.

Fear, racism at town hall meetings

August has been the month of rage.  In made-for-television “town hall meetings” across the country, grey-haired white men and women in t-shirts stand and hurl abuse at their Congress members and senators, snarling and shouting – their eyes popping apoplectically and choking with anger.

“Protesters assert the health plan is merely the thin edge of the wedge for a socialistic overhaul of American society”

Most Americans cannot even give a reasonable definition of Socialism … they are expert at parroting someone else.

VA workers given millions in bonuses as vets await checks

• Report details financial, ethical misconduct among IT employees at VA Department
• Report: Retired VA official acted as if she was given a “blank checkbook” for bonuses
• Bonuses were paid despite backlog of vets’ disability claims

While hundreds of thousands of disability claims lay backlogged at the Department of Veterans Affairs, thousands of technology employees at the department received $24 million in bonuses, a new report says.   President Obama has told Congress it is a priority to reduce the number of backlogged claims at the VA, where claims are coming in at a faster rate than they can be processed.   According to a Government Accountability Office report, the VA processed 60 percent more claims from 1999 to 2008 than it did a decade earlier, but the number of claims still pending jumped 65 percent.

The contrast between selfless and selfish is glaring, but, typical of government management, comparison of fairness is not policy.

Pushing hard against a public health care plan, much to the delight of two seriously moneyed special interest groups–insurers and pharmaceuticals are the Blue Dogs: moderate, vocal and funded in part by the industries trying to protect their bottom line.

The excuse that their conservative constituents are against “public option health care”, only means they have failed to adequately explain WHY it is necessary and NOT SOCIALISM.

Obama Says U.S. Health-Care Debate Dominated by ‘Distortions’

Obama said opponents have falsely said that Democratic health-insurance legislation would cover illegal immigrants, provide federal funding for abortions and lead to a government takeover of health care.

“These are phony claims meant to divide us,” Obama said.

Obama said proposals for a government-run insurance plan, to compete against private insurers, have created confusion about government involvement in the health-care system.

- would give the federal government too much control over health care. 

-when the government is setting the rules and is backed by tax dollars, it will destroy, not compete, with the private sector.

Republicans are experts at distortion, they have sustained their ability to misrepresent issues, just like they did about the Iraq War.

Republican definition of reality is unrealistic in today’s world.

Racism? “You betcha!”

So, when you see these town-hall hatemongers, gun-toting “patriots” and whacked-out conspiracy theorists on your TV, remember that they are not merely common, garden variety lunatics, but heirs to a rich and time-honoured American tradition.

“Of course, these people can realise their dream of living in a no-taxes, no-government, guns-for-all society simply by moving to Somalia”

It’s time for preseason football games, but the Texas Progressive Alliance is always in midseason form. Here are this week’s blog highlights.

CouldBeTrue of South Texas Chisme wonders why we put up with temper tantrums and intimidation from the far right? Everyone should have their say in our democracy.

Off the Kuff takes a look at the At Large City Council races in Houston.

BossKitty at TruthHugger has been awakened from slumber by the nightmare of the Health Care Debacle. Look who’s causing all the trouble and whose being thrown to the wolves. Without Health Options – Where Is Your Voice? OpEd

Over at TexasKaos, lightseeker connects the dots between the fear mongering, health care and history. He then throws in the return of the militias for good measure. If armed , frightened groups are reappearing in Iowa, how long before they show up in Texas. You do remember Republic of Texas movment, don’t you? See it all in Fear, Health Care and History: A Reflection Updated! – Return of the militias

Harry Balczak at McBlogger begins a new feature, This Week In Lawyerin’, in which he’ll take a look at some arcane legal concept and educate you on it. This week, what to do when caught with kiddie porn.

WCNews at Eye On Williamson shows that nothing will change no matter who is the GOP nominee for governor in 2010, Kay, Rick and the Trans-Texas Corridor – nothing new here.

Rachel Maddow vs. Dick Armey on Press the Meat Sunday morning was previewed and then summarized by PDiddie at Brains and Eggs. It so happens that even Joe Scarborough thinks Armey is a douchebag.

Neil at Texas Liberal is in Cincinnati. Cincinnati police last week staged a “blue flu” where some members of the force called in sick even though they were not sick. They are upset over possible layoffs of police. Yet they are not so concerned about this prospect that they are willing to make some minor contract concessions in order to help the City of Cincinnati with a budget deficit. It’s the same old story with the Cincinnati Police Department. They expect you to do what they say, but they have a hard time doing what they are told to do and a hard time caring about fellow city employees.

DosCentavos reports on the happenings in HD-127 now that Joe Crabb is finally retiring. He’s also running a poll, so check it out!

Nat-Wu at Three Wise Men is not so impressed with the new Calvinists “manly” Jesus.