Divergence

Four Reasons We Vaccinated Our Kids Against COVID-19

noreply@blogger.com (trevan) — Fri, 28 Jan 2022 19:07:00 +0000

At the first chance possible we took Luke (10) and Zeke (7) to get vaccinated against COVID-19. There are four reasons we made this choice that I hope might encourage other parents to do the same.

First, we trust the science and data that has undeniably shown that vaccinations work. They reduce the risk of contracting COVID-19 and even if you have a breakthrough case, the chance of hospitalization or even death are drastically reduced. You can see the overwhelming data from California here: https://covid19.ca.gov/state-dashboard/#postvax-status

Without question, we have trusted our doctors and the regular immunization schedule for school. We get a flu shot every year. We give our kids Tylenol or Ibuprofen when they're sick. They’ve taken antibiotics as prescribed. We aren’t going to stop trusting our doctors now.

Second, we’re doing it to protect their grandparents and other adults with risk factors. While the risk of serious complications for them is quite low, it is high for their grandparents, two of which we see weekly. By vaccinating them, we are protecting those more vulnerable and the ones we love the most. (NOTE: You may be surprised that in the US, nearly 17% of COVID-19 cases (last checked on January 26, 2022) are 0-17 years old. You can see that data here: https://covid.cdc.gov/covid-data-tracker/#demographics)

Third, we want our boys to proactively serve and love others. I understand the concern of parents wanting to see more data and ensure there are no unintended side effects before vaccinating their kids. However, there is no way to prove any of that unless kids get vaccinated and we have data (shout-out to parents who had their kids be part of the initial trials). I have almost zero concern about the safety of the vaccine, but even if I did, I want our family to do our best to serve and help others, even when it feels risky. If my kids getting vaccinated can help prove the efficacy of the vaccine, I hope our family can serve the world in this way. I have thought about one of my kids having some complication from the vaccine. Even if that happens, I will not regret the decision. Vaccines save lives and if my kid gets a complication, I trust they will take that experience to help ensure other kids don’t experience the same.

Fourth, vaccines are the path back to normalcy. These last two years have been tough on everyone but we needed to make some sacrifices to save lives. Now, with vaccines, we have the chance to get rid of quarantines, masks, and being afraid of having potlucks. If you want school to be normal again, get your kids vaccinated.

I’m not interested in debating online about this. However, if you genuinely are struggling with this decision and would like to talk, I’m happy to do so by phone. Send me an email and we can setup a time to chat.

Ordination

noreply@blogger.com (trevan) — Wed, 22 Apr 2015 16:31:00 +0000

I was ordained as a pastor on April 11, 2015. Here is a video of the service.

Literalism

noreply@blogger.com (trevan) — Sat, 23 Feb 2013 06:36:00 +0000

"Literalism is usually the lowest and least level of meaning."
Richard Rohr, Falling Upward, 106

It seems that the popular thought in Adventism today is that we need to take Scripture at "face value" and accept the "literal" meaning of the text. Those who do this are lauded for their great faith and trust in God and his word. However, as Richard Rohr suggests, this literalistic approach provides "the lowest and least level of meaning."

I'd suggest that those who wrestle with Scripture, who challenge it, question it, even disagree with it, are the ones with great faith. They are willing to leave behind a faith that has answers for all the questions and instead embrace the mystery of God.

Instead of being a virtue, a rigid literalism is actually a vice.

What Would Ellen White Say to Church Leaders?

noreply@blogger.com (trevan) — Wed, 15 Aug 2012 04:35:00 +0000

This blog post was written for the Spectrum Blog and was posted on August 15, 2012 here.

Last week I asked what Martin Luther King would say about the current ordination struggle. Today I am asking what Ellen White would say.

In The Great Controversy, White writes about Martin Luther’s experience before the Diet of Worms. In this chapter, she hails Luther as a great model of faith who was willing to stand up for his convictions despite great opposition and risk of personal peril.

During his trial at the Diet of Worms, Luther was told that he must either retract his writings or face severe consequences. White records Luther’s response:

“The Reformer answered: ‘Since your most serene majesty and your high mightinesses require from me a clear, simple, and precise answer, I will give you one, and it is this: I cannot submit my faith either to the pope or to the councils, because it is clear as the day that they have frequently erred and contradicted each other. Unless therefore I am convinced by the testimony of Scripture or by the clearest reasoning, unless I am persuaded by means of the passages I have quoted, and unless they thus render my conscience bound by the word of God, I cannot and I will not retract, for it is unsafe for a Christian to speak against his conscience. Here I stand, I can do no other; may God help me. Amen.’" (160)

In my opinion, the most disturbing part of the entire debate surrounding women’s ordination came during Elder Ted Wilson’s appearance on 3ABN last week. In an hour-long interview, he referred to those of us fighting in favor of women’s ordination as having “moral convictions.” However, the key word he kept on saying over and over again was “submission.” In Wilson’s opinion, we need to submit our moral convictions for the sake of the unity of the church.

Yet, we cannot do this because “it is unsafe for a Christian to speak against his conscience.”

White states that Luther’s bold speech had a powerful effect on all those present:

“The partisans of Rome had been worsted; their cause appeared in a most unfavorable light. They sought to maintain their power, not by appealing to the Scriptures, but by a resort to threats, Rome's unfailing argument” (161).

It has been widely noted that in the GC’s first document appealing for unity, that there was not a single mention of Scripture. They have since put out a second document which now starts with a quote from Jesus’ prayer in John 17, has a reference to Acts 15, and is titled “An Appeal for Oneness in Christ.” It appears they belatedly caught their omission and tried to fix it but their true intentions were not missed.

The new letter also contains a carefully-worded threat when it states, “The action taken by the Columbia Union Conference represents a serious threat to the unity of the worldwide Seventh-day Adventist Church, and thus, at its next meeting in October 2012, the General Conference Executive Committee will carefully review the situation and determine how to respond.” This not only puts the Columbia Union on notice, but is also meant to warn the Pacific Union that there will be consequences if they join the Columba Union in ordaining women.

History surely repeats itself as once again those in power seek to maintain it not by appealing to Scripture, but instead, resorting to threats.

Later in the chapter, White continues to laud the great courage and conviction of Luther:

“Had the Reformer yielded a single point, Satan and his hosts would have gained the victory. But his unwavering firmness was the means of emancipating the church, and beginning a new and better era. The influence of this one man, who dared to think and act for himself in religious matters, was to affect the church and the world, not only in his own time, but in all future generations. His firmness and fidelity would strengthen all, to the close of time, who should pass through a similar experience. The power and majesty of God stood forth above the counsel of men, above the mighty power of Satan” (166).

I hope we all have that same “unwavering firmness” which will help “emancipate” this church to bring on a “new and better era.” Let us not be afraid to think and act for ourselves because it will serve as a witness for future generations.

The final quotation I will share speaks directly to Elder Wilson’s call for submission despite our moral convictions. She writes:

“After his departure, still desirous that his firmness should not be mistaken for rebellion, Luther wrote to the emperor. "God, who is the searcher of hearts, is my witness," he said, "that I am ready most earnestly to obey your majesty, in honor or in dishonor, in life or in death, and with no exception save the word of God, by which man lives. In all the affairs of this present life, my fidelity shall be unshaken, for here to lose or to gain is of no consequence to salvation. But when eternal interests are concerned, God wills not that man should submit unto man. For such submission in spiritual matters is a real worship, and ought to be rendered solely to the Creator” (167).

I have spent over 20 years in Adventist education. One of the values that was instilled in me every year was the importance of standing up for what I knew to be right, no matter the cost. I was told to think and act for myself and not allow any man to control my actions. This lesson was reinforced as we learned about the Adventist pioneers who had to leave their churches in order to stand up for their beliefs and convictions. They could not remain quiet while their churches were not living up to what they believed to be true.

As a pastor, I was taught to appeal to prospective baptismal candidates to live their lives in accordance with their newfound beliefs. To encourage them to take a stand for Christ even if their families and churches tried to pressure them into maintaining the status quo for the sake of peace and unity.

This stands in stark contrast to the messages being sent to us from the GC leadership. We are now being told that we must check our convictions at the door of the church and instead submit. While we used to applaud the pioneers for fiercely standing up for their convictions, doing the same now is seen as causing dissension and disunity.

Yet, there still is a minority, dare I say, a remnant, who believe they must stand up for their convictions. Who are unwilling to sit idly by. Who agree with Luther and refuse to submit to anyone other than God.

So, to Elder Wilson, and the other denominational leaders who are attempting to force the supporters of women’s ordination to submit to their authority, let it be clearly known:

We will not submit!

What Would MLK Say to Church Leaders?

noreply@blogger.com (trevan) — Wed, 08 Aug 2012 04:33:00 +0000

This blog post was originally written for the Spectrum Blog and was posted on August 8, 2012 here.

I often find myself turning to the sermons and writings of Martin Luther King, Jr. when contemplating issues of justice. In light of the debate surrounding women’s ordination, I turned again to his writings, specifically his “Letter from Birmingham Jail,”[i] for guidance. In reading this letter again, I was struck at how relevant it is for the discussion today.

The “Letter From Birmingham Jail” was written in response to a letter he received while in jail from eight white ministers. This letter was titled, “A Call For Unity,” in which the pastors urged King and others fighting for justice to pursue the matters through the courts and to abide by their decisions. They suggest that progress was being made and that the demonstrations were “unwise and untimely.”[ii]

In eerily similar fashion, on June 29, the General Conference also issued their own “Appeal For Unity,”[iii] calling for the Columbia Union and Pacific Union to allow the study process setup by the CG to play itself out. It too dangles the carrot of progress and study in an attempt to squelch the voices calling for justice.

So what did King write in response to the call that the demand for immediate justice was “unwise and untimely?

Perhaps the most famous quote from his letter reminds us that we cannot pick and choose when we will fight for justice because:

"Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere. We are caught in an inescapable network of mutuality, tied in a single garment of destiny. Whatever affects one directly, affects all indirectly."

King also responds to the idea that their protests were untimely and that they should wait for the process to play itself out by writing:

"My friends, I must say to you that we have not made a single gain in civil rights without determined legal and nonviolent pressure. Lamentably, it is an historical fact that privileged groups seldom give up their privileges voluntarily. Individuals may see the moral light and voluntarily give up their unjust posture; but, as Reinhold Niebhuhr has reminded us, groups tend to be more immoral than individuals.

We know through painful experience that freedom is never voluntarily given by the oppressor; it must be demanded by the oppressed. Frankly, I have yet to engage in a direct-action campaign that was "well timed" in the view of those who have not suffered unduly from the disease of segregation. For years now I have heard the word "Wait!" It rings in the ear of every Negro with piercing familiarity. This "Wait" has almost always meant "Never." We must come to see, with one of our distinguished jurists, that "justice too long delayed is justice denied."

When the GC issued their appeal for unity, it was touted that it had the full support of “40 senior leaders of the church, including the 13 division presidents who also serve as vice-presidents of the General Conference.”[iv] It should be noted that there was likely only one woman, Ella Simmons, a General Conference Vice President, who was part of that group of 40. How different would that letter have been if more voices of those who are “oppressed” were being heard?
Perhaps the most stinging critique King provides is that of the “white moderate.” He writes:

"I must make two honest confessions to you, my Christian and Jewish brothers. First, I must confess that over the past few years I have been gravely disappointed with the white moderate. I have almost reached the regrettable conclusion that the Negro's great stumbling block in his stride toward freedom is not the White Citizen’s Counciler or the Ku Klux Klanner but the white moderate, who is more devoted to "order" than to justice; who prefers a negative peace which is the absence of tension to a positive peace which is the presence of justice; who constantly says: "I agree with you in the goal you seek, but I cannot agree with your methods of direct action"; who paternalistically believes he can set the timetable for another man's freedom; who lives by a mythical concept of time and who constantly advises the Negro to wait for a "more convenient season." Shallow understanding from people of good will is more frustrating than absolute misunderstanding from people of ill will. Lukewarm acceptance is much more bewildering than outright rejection."

He continues later:

"I had also hoped that the white moderate would reject the myth concerning time in relation to the struggle for freedom. I have just received a letter from a white brother in Texas. He writes: "All Christians know that the colored people will receive equal rights eventually, but it is possible that you are in too great a religious hurry. It has taken Christianity almost two thousand years to accomplish what it has. The teachings of Christ take time to come to earth." Such an attitude stems from a tragic misconception of time, from the strangely rational notion that there is something in the very flow of time that will inevitably cure all ills. Actually, time itself is neutral; it can be used either destructively or constructively. More and more I feel that the people of ill will have used time much more effectively than have the people of good will. We will have to repent in this generation not merely for the hateful words and actions of the bad people but for the appalling silence of the good people. Human progress never rolls in on wheels of inevitability; it comes through the tireless efforts of men willing to be co-workers with God, and without this hard work, time itself becomes an ally of the forces of social stagnation. We must use time creatively, in the knowledge that the time is always ripe to do right. Now is the time to make real the promise of democracy and transform our pending national elegy into a creative psalm of brotherhood. Now is the time to lift our national policy from the quicksand of racial injustice to the solid rock of human dignity."

I have talked to several people who have said that they believe women should be ordained. However, they don’t want to fight the issue because it’s merely a distraction and there are more pressing matters such as saving the lost. Others say they don’t want to risk offending Adventists in other parts of the world. Even others add that we should let the study process play itself out. They always end with their belief that the church will eventually ordain women so let’s just not worry about it now.

After reading the above quotes from King, it’s hard to still embrace the position of “I support women’s ordination, but. . .” As he reminds us, “time itself is neutral” and “progress never rolls in on wheels of inevitability; it comes through the tireless efforts of men willing to be co-workers with God, and without this hard work, time itself becomes an ally of the forces of social stagnation.”

As you read the GC’s “Appeal for Unity” you see them trying to paint those fighting for women’s ordination to happen now to be taking an extreme position that is out of harmony with the rest of Adventism. However, we should not be deterred as King reminds us:

"But though I was initially disappointed at being categorized as an extremist, as I continued to think about the matter I gradually gained a measure of satisfaction from the label. Was not Jesus an extremist for love: "Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully use you, and persecute you." Was not Amos an extremist for justice: "Let justice roll down like waters and righteousness like an ever-flowing stream." Was not Paul an extremist for the Christian gospel: "I bear in my body the marks of the Lord Jesus." Was not Martin Luther an extremist: "Here I stand; I cannot do otherwise, so help me God." And John Bunyan: "I will stay in jail to the end of my days before I make a butchery of my conscience." And Abraham Lincoln: "This nation cannot survive half slave and half free." And Thomas Jefferson: "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal ..." So the question is not whether we will be extremists, but what kind of extremists we will be. Will we be extremists for hate or for love? Will we be extremists for the preservation of injustice or for the extension of justice? In that dramatic scene on Calvary's hill three men were crucified. We must never forget that all three were crucified for the same crime–the crime of extremism. Two were extremists for immorality, and thus fell below their environment. The other, Jesus Christ, was an extremist for love, truth and goodness, and thereby rose above his environment. Perhaps the South, the nation and the world are in dire need of creative extremists."

I will close with a final reflection from King which provides a prophetic warning to the church:

"So often the contemporary church is a weak, ineffectual voice with an uncertain sound. So often it is an archdefender of the status quo. Far from being disturbed by the presence of the church, the power structure of the average community is consoled by the church's silent–and often even vocal–sanction of things as they are.

But the judgment of God is upon the church as never before. If today's church does not recapture the sacrificial spirit of the early church, it will lose its authenticity, forfeit the loyalty of millions, and be dismissed as an irrelevant social club with no meaning for the twentieth century. Every day I meet young people whose disappointment with the church has turned into outright disgust."

My prayer is that all of us will not stand idly by but ensure that this prophetic warning will not come true. May we all be devoted to justice today, not tomorrow.

[i] A full copy of the “Letter from Birmingham Jail” can be accessed here.

[ii] A full copy of “An Appeal for Unity” can be downloaded here.

[iii] The full letter can be accessed here.

[iv] Mark Kellner, “On ordination questions, Adventist leadership appeals for orderly process.” Accessed here.

Is Being Unique A Virtue?

noreply@blogger.com (trevan) — Fri, 16 Jul 2010 04:19:00 +0000

This blog post was originally written for Spectrum Blog and posted on their site on July 16, 2010 here.

Should the Seventh-day Adventist Church strive to remain unique and distinctive in its beliefs and practices? Is our uniqueness a virtue?

My guess is that the majority of Adventists would answer those questions with a hearty, “yes.” In fact, many of our institutions and ministries use the importance of remaining unique to justify their existence, raise funds, and sell their products.

In contrast to this, I would like to suggest that the desire to remain unique is, in fact, negatively affecting our faith and witness and should not be one of our goals.

If you look up the definition of “unique,” you will find phrases such as “highly unusual or rare,” or “radically distinctive.” If this is what it means to be unique, the fact that we have so many unique doctrines simply means that we have not been effective enough in our witness. Instead of being a virtue, our uniqueness is a sign of failure.

Don’t we want the whole world to experience the joy of Sabbath rest? Don’t we want the world to experience the peace of knowing their loved ones that have passed away are sleeping and will be resurrected at the second coming? Don’t we want the world to understand the importance of Christ’s sacrifice through an understanding of the Sanctuary? Don’t we want the world to embrace the hope of the Second Coming?

I believe that those who trumpet the importance of us remaining unique would all answer the above questions with another hearty, “yes” (as we all should). In fact, those who talk the most about us being unique usually have the highest levels of evangelistic zeal. However, the desire to remain unique requires that the above things do not happen and provides quite the paradox. To remain sufficiently unique we must either not evangelize at all, or evangelize, but with little success. I believe we are doing the latter and the lack of success is due to one of the major problems with an overemphasis on being unique.

You’ll often hear Adventists say that the rest of Christianity “has Jesus” but we have something “deeper” and more than “just Jesus.” We assume people can hear about Jesus elsewhere and after all, we need to get to our unique doctrines they won’t hear anywhere else. It leads us to not sufficiently convert people to Christ nor emphasize enough how our doctrines are centered in our relationship with him. Without doing these things, we will have some success, but far too little.

There is no question that the early Adventist pioneers loudly trumpeted the importance of their “unique” and “distinct” message. You can find numerous quotes from Ellen White and others about the importance of holding fast to our unique teachings and these quotes are often used to show how we need to do the same today. However, we are at a completely different time in the history of the Advent movement. We aren’t a fledgling new denomination with thousands of members. Instead, we’re a church of sixteen million that is 150 years old. The rhetoric that was used to justify their existence then, will not necessarily equate today. Their statements about being unique were more descriptive than prescriptive for the entire history of Adventism. If Ellen White were alive today, I would guess that she would not extol our continued uniqueness as a virtue but instead lament how little traction we’ve gained in a world of 6.8 billion people.

Don’t get me wrong, I’m not suggesting we give up what makes us unique in order to just fit in with the crowd for there is a time and place for being unique. However, I do believe that our rhetoric regarding uniqueness is overemphasized and is having a largely negative effect on our faith and witness. Instead of striving to remain unique, we should strive to remain faithful to God whether that is unique or common. And if there is a point where we are unique, let us put our whole energies into becoming less unique so that more people will see and experience the beauty of the Adventist faith.

Life of a Pastor

noreply@blogger.com (trevan) — Sat, 13 Jun 2009 23:23:00 +0000

It was shaping up to be a long, draining Sabbath an Adventist pastor experiences quite often. I got up around 7am and didn't finish the day until 10pm (I did get a chance to sneak a nap in so that helped). Although too long, it provided a lot of thought-provoking experiences that made it manageable.

The week turned out to be filled with good news. On Monday, a member had a baby so that was exciting. Another member had back surgery on Tuesday that went well. Wednesday, one of our members' sons was had a very rare and serious surgery. It literally took all day but by late afternoon we got the great news that everything had gone well. So, we were coming to church in a celebrative mood. Then, before Sabbath School started, a mother and daughter-in-law were crying and hugging each other because another daughter-in-law was given bad news about her cancer. The doctors have told her she has two months to live. This actual is quite typical in church. You have people coming full of praise and thanksgiving for God's care and healing and others distraught over bad health reports. Needless to say, minstering in this context is incredibly difficult. One second, you have to smile and celebrate, the next moment cry and mourn.

I was starting a sermon series on Psalm 23 and focused on verse 1. All week I was really struggling wtih the line, "I shall not want." I believe we should be content, but doesn't God also call us to have hope in things we don't have yet? Shouldn't we want the second coming? I had some thoughts but didn't really have it figured out and I told the people that and opened up the floor and said, "Help me out here. I don't know how to understand this." We proceeded to have an amazing conversation. No one dominated. Some of the people who I thought would drive the conversation didn't say a word. Young people shared, older people shared, it was amazing. We wrestled with the text together and left feeling like we understood it better. I've been really wrestling with the passive nature of worship services and particularly the sermon. I'll try this some more in the future since it went so well this time and preach the sermon as a community.

That evening I went to a nursing home to do communion with a member who isn't able to make it to church anymore. It didn't go well. He was confused, distracted, and while he had a few moments of clarity, overall I don't think he knew what was happening. It got me wondering about when you stop doing communion for someone who doesn't really know what is going on. Is there still something special that happens when you do it even if it appears they aren't fully aware?

I won't even mention anything about nominating committee, visitor potluck, and Richmond Academy graduation which also took place that Sabbath. Needless to say, it was an interesting day of ministry providing a lot of food for thought.

Evangelism as an Invitation (Part 2)

noreply@blogger.com (trevan) — Thu, 19 Mar 2009 02:42:00 +0000

In our last post we looked at the idea of evangelism being an invitation to join a shared faith journey. It’s not about presenting a completed theological package but a process of shared discovery as the Spirit unfolds truth. I ended that post with the idea that this is a better way not just because it “works” but more true to our Christian experience and calling.

One of the guiding principles of the Adventist church that I connect most deeply with is the idea of progressive truth. The early church founders were dead set against any kind of creed because they felt it would stop the church from growing in its understanding of God and his Word. I believe the church has gradually lost this sight of this guiding principle but it must be regained. Our greatest fear cannot be what new things God might reveal to us that would cause discomfort but instead remaining mired in our present understanding of the amazing God we all want to know.

Jesus serves as the model of someone who constantly challenged the status quo and opened eyes to new insights and ideas about who God was and what his plans were. He repeatedly butted heads with the Pharisees who didn’t like how he was destroying the neat boxes that had placed God in.

This different model also calls us to truly have a daily experience with God. We cannot just rely on a mental acceptance of “truth” that we can rattle off the top of our heads with ease. Instead, our lives will have to reveal that we are seeking for God to be the source and strength of our lives and the one who is leading our path. We'll have no choice but to spend time in communication with God through Bible study and prayer. We'll engage in service and seek to bring justice to the world. We will have healthy relationships and give selflessly. We might not be nor do it well all, or even most, of the time but we'll be on the path to getting there.

Who are you sharing your journey of faith with? I hope it’s not just fellow believers who think and act just like you. We need some of that, but God has called us outside of our safe boxes to enter into the world and partner with what God is up to already. That’s the good news in all this. It’s not all about us. It’s about finding where the Spirit is at work and allowing the Spirit to use us as he desires.

Evangelism as an Invitation (Part 1)

noreply@blogger.com (trevan) — Sun, 15 Mar 2009 02:41:00 +0000

Evangelism is typically viewed as something done by full-time ministers who preach a message that the evangelized person accepts and starts a process leading to baptism. It’s usually presenting a completed theological package and is a one-way street from evangelizer to the evangelized.

While that approach has its place, I’d like to suggest that a different model is needed today. What if we viewed evangelism as an invitation? Not an invitation to hear a proclamation but an invitation to a shared faith journey.

The woman at the well in John 4 gives us the model for this approach. She has a life-transforming experience with God and then has no choice but to share it with the community. She doesn’t have it all figured out but actually asks the question, “Can this be the Messiah?” In this way she invites people to engage in discussion and discovery together. It’s not based on a neat theological package she has developed with all the answers but a reliance on the Holy Spirit to unfold truth in the context of a community seeking for God.

If we look at Jesus’ method of teaching, he too used this invitational model more than anything else. In his teaching he often made provocative statements that begged questions and further discovery. He also spoke in parables which often had cryptic messages that could only be understood after intense study and interaction with the stories.

I believe this approach is more appropriate not just because it will “work” better today but actually is more true to the Christian calling and experience than the proclamation method. More on that in a future post. . .

What Makes a Pastor Successful?

noreply@blogger.com (trevan) — Fri, 12 Sep 2008 02:37:00 +0000

If only there was an easy answer to that question.

I've found that each "success" in minstry brings with it the realization that there is much more work to be done. For each baptism, knowing there are millions more unreached people in the city. For each life-changing sermon for one person, 10 others who were sleeping the whole time. For each conflict resolved, 1,000 more on the way. Success and the idea of a job well done and completed seems like an impossible dream.

With this in mind, I've found myself relying on one thing to make myself feel successful. In talking with other pastors and seeing them twittering and updating their facebook statuses they seem to have the same definition of success as well. What makes a pastor successful?

BUSYNESS.

That's all we can end up relying on in the end. We see all the things that can and should be done. Our church members constantly come to us reminding us of all that is wrong with the church. So, we just take satisfaction in being busy. We can't do it all but at least I know I put in a 70 hour work week to do my part.

This definition of success is damaging, unhealthy, and reveals failure not success. Pastoral ministry will never be easy and always full of challenges and hard work. However, we also need to acknowledge that ultimately Jesus is the head of the church and the church will move on without all our busy activity.

One thing pastors need to remember is this: We aren't exempt from the Sabbath. Sure, we have responsibilities on Sabbath and it will always be a day of work for us. However, that means there should be another day where we rest from work and acknowledge Jesus is the head of the church and we can trust that He will lead it even without us.

To all the Pastors: Stop breaking the Sabbath principle. Stop being busy. Stop thinking you run the show and it can't go on without you.

To all the church members: Next time you see your pastor, ask him when the last time he took a day off was. Then insist that every week he takes a day to rest and experience the joy of Sabbath. Also, at the next board meeting get the leaders of the church to support the Pastor in doing this so everyone knows and will make it a reality.

A Question for Christians

noreply@blogger.com (trevan) — Thu, 29 May 2008 02:33:00 +0000

“What does it mean to represent the Kingdom of God in a culture devoted to the Kingdom of Self?” -- Eugene Peterson

Doesn't that question lay at the heart of what it means to be a Christian today? The question challenges us to examine how much of our spirituality and religiosity is rooted in self-interest as opposed to following the self-sacrificial way of Jesus and his Kingdom.

This quote doesn't call for the church to go on a rampage against a godless nation and fight culture wars in an attempt to demonize and garner self-righteous approval. Instead, it calls individual Christians and churches to examine ourselves and see how we have fallen into the ideology of the kingdom of self and seek to replace it with true, kingdom of God values and practices. This self-sacrificial love is what can help redeem the larger culture and help the kingdom of God advance and make a dent in the pervasive kingdom of self.

Come and See

noreply@blogger.com (trevan) — Sat, 12 Apr 2008 02:32:00 +0000

In John 1:29-34, John the Baptist exclaims that Jesus is the "lamb of God." The next day he was with a couple of his disciples when he sees Jesus pass by and tells them to look at the lamb of God. They start following Jesus who eventually turns around asks them what they want. They ask, "Rabbi, where are you staying?"

Jesus could have responded with, "At the corner of Wilson Lane and Jefferson St," and be done with it. Instead, he says, "Come, and you will see." The disciples end up spending the entire day with Jesus and when they leave, Andrew goes immediately to tell his brother Simon (who Jesus would re-name Peter) about Jesus and bring him to spend time with him as well. The rest is history.

This story is indicative of the way Jesus started his revolution of faith: through inviting people to follow him and experience first-hand what the kingdom was all about. Jesus could have had a discussion with the disciples in which he told them where he was staying, talk about the weather, talk about the kingdom some, and then move on. Instead, he invited them to spend the day with him, experiencing what he was all about and they immediately became disciples and then brought others to experience the same adventure of following Jesus.

The most effective witness is inviting someone to experience the way of Jesus. Invite them to join you as you serve in the community and discuss why this is important to God. Spend time with them in the daily routines of your life and show how viewing your whole life as an act of worship gives a new perspective. Let them experience a heart-felt worship service where they see the value of living in community.

Most witnessing paradigms are based on convincing people to believe the right theological concepts and once you get that settled they are ready to experience God and engage in His work. Jesus models a different way in which he invites people to follow him, to experience the way of Jesus, and in the process the theological framework will come into focus.

Dealing with Loss

noreply@blogger.com (trevan) — Mon, 17 Dec 2007 03:29:00 +0000

Thought I'd share a few things that I've learned over the last several months about dealing with the loss of a loved one. As I mentioned in a previous post, my grandfather died in August and a few months ago we lost two church members in a two week period so it's been something on my heart and mind a lot.

1. Everyone mourns differently and needs to be given space and time to mourn in the way that is appropriate to them. All three experiences had some similarities but were also quite different. Our personalities play a key role in determining how we mourn and there really is no correct way to go about it. The key thing is that within the family, each person is given freedom to express their grief, without being attacked by someone else for not mourning the "right" way.

2. It is emotionally draining. First, you're confronted by the reality that you will no longer be with this person you love dearly. Then, you have to make all the phone calls to family and friends to let them know. You'll start coming to terms with that reality only to get a phone call where you have to re-live it all over again.

3. It is physically draining. Most people have a hard time sleeping and have no desire to eat. On top of that . . .

4. Funerals/Memorial Services are A LOT of work. One church member reflected on the experience and said it was like planning a wedding in a couple days. There are a million things that have to be taken care of and so many different options and decisions it can be overwhelming. Finding the right funeral home is the most important thing because it makes all the difference in the world. I also highly recommend making pre-arrangements (filling out some paperwork and make a few general decisions before your loved one passes) because it really makes things much easier to plan. I know it can seem wierd and almost like you're betraying your loved one but it makes things so much easier for the family.

5. It takes time. Once all the out-of-town family leaves and life gets back to normal, the real healing begins. You learn how to adjust to your new life while always being reminded about them. The holidays are a particularly difficult time of year and it's vitally important that the family is together as much as possible to support each other through it.

Sean Taylor Funeral

noreply@blogger.com (trevan) — Wed, 05 Dec 2007 03:29:00 +0000

Today, a three hour funeral was held for Sean Taylor. There were several emotional moments throughout the service as there were numerous tributes from family, friends, and teammates all bringing their unique perspecive to honor Sean.

I had previously heard that Sean Taylor grew up Seventh-day Adventist and that was definitely the case. Two Adventist pastors took part in the service including the homily by Pastor David L. Peay, Sr. who is the pastor of the Tabernacle Seventh-day Adventist Church (The church choir also sang two songs). Sean attended the church this summer and raised his hand during an appeal. Pastor Peay also spent several hours with him a month ago talking about a variety of issues. He avoided the temptation to give a study on the Adventist perspective on the state of the dead but he did reference a brief quote from the "servant of the Lord."

I must admit that they were a few cringe-inducing moments during the homily, including the pastor wondering if Sean died because they were many people in his family who knew the truth but weren't living it out. This coming after a long discourse on seeing many people come to church for a viewing who don't come to church otherwise and wondering why it took Sean's death to get them there. He asked, "Isn't Jesus' death enough?" I understand that there were many people in attendance and watching who aren't actively practicing faith but I wonder how appropriate it is to go on the evangelistic offense at a time like this. Jesse Jackson also somehow found his way to the funeral and seized the opportunity to advance his agenda.

Perhaps I'll share some insights I've learned about the grieving process and what I've found to be helpful and unhelpful over the next few days.

The Redskins have a short week as they play on Thursday night versus the Bears. After four straight losses and dealing with this death, a win sure would lift our spirits. I'm not counting on it though and at the end of the day, I guess it's really not all that important in the larger scheme of things.

My Reaction to Sean Taylor's Death

noreply@blogger.com (trevan) — Wed, 28 Nov 2007 03:23:00 +0000

Sean Taylor, a superstar on my favorite team, the Washington Redskins, was shot in his house early yesterday morning and succumbed to his injuries early this morning. He had some troubling incidents several years ago but after his daughter was born 18 months ago he started to turn his life around. He was becoming one of the best players in the NFL but it all came to an end at just 24 years of age.
I've been confronted by death all too much in the last few months. It started at the end of August when my grandfather passed away. Several weeks ago, a stretch began where two of my church members died within a two weeks of each other. As crazy as it sounds, Taylor's death has been deeply emotional for me. Not as much as those I knew and loved, but it's not too far away. Let me explain why.
I've been a huge Redskins fan for as long as I can remember. My dad wasn't a big fan so I don't know what made me obsessed with the Redskins, and sports in general, but I've never missed more than a couple of games in a season. Today, the Redskins have become my escape. The pressures of life can be overwhelming and while my faith in God is the primary way I survive, the Redskins also provide a nice diversion from the pressures I face every day. I read about the Redskins every day and watch all their games because I need a break from the realities of the pain, suffering, and death that is all around me not to be confronted by it again.
It's also been hard because the players are like my extended family. I know it sounds ridiculous to those of you who aren't into sports but ask any huge sports fan and they will tell you they feel that way about "their team." I also often joke that the Redskins are the second denomination I'm a member of with the players, coaches, and fans being the church members. It really is an exaggeration but whatever team you are a fan of you feel part of a larger family. When you talk about the team you say "we" as though you get out their on the field with them or are part of the personnel decisions. Taylor was that younger brother who frustrated you by his immaturity early on but was glad he was starting to put things together.
The worst part about it all is thinking about an 18 month old baby who won't grow up with her father. Chick Hernandez, a local sports reporter, would choke up every time he talked about his own children and how this little girl wouldn't know her dad. I couldn't help but cry either. Unfortunately, it's a story that is repeated all too often and hopefully this higher profile situation will help communities figure out ways to stop the senseless killing and violence of young men who won't be able to be a father to their children.
The games will go on and no one knows how the players and coaches will respond on the football field. They are in the midst of the playoff chase which doesn't seem that important anymore. However, I need as many weeks of escape I can get so I'm hoping they rally together and make a strong run. Ultimately it's not that important, but here's hoping they can provide a few more weeks of joy to the Redskins family.

Bloggin the 28: Growing in Christ

noreply@blogger.com (trevan) — Tue, 11 Sep 2007 02:19:00 +0000

This is my reflection for the Bloggin the 28 Series on Belief #11: Growing in Christ. It states:

By His death on the cross Jesus triumphed over the forces of evil. He who subjugated the demonic spirits during His earthly ministry has broken their power and made certain their ultimate doom. Jesus' victory gives us victory over the evil forces that still seek to control us, as we walk with Him in peace, joy, and assurance of His love. Now the Holy Spirit dwells within us and empowers us. Continually committed to Jesus as our Saviour and Lord, we are set free from the burden of our past deeds. No longer do we live in the darkness, fear of evil powers, ignorance, and meaninglessness of our former way of life. In this new freedom in Jesus, we are called to grow into the likeness of His character, communing with Him daily in prayer, feeding on His Word, meditating on it and on His providence, singing His praises, gathering together for worship, and participating in the mission of the Church. As we give ourselves in loving service to those around us and in witnessing to His salvation, His constant presence with us through the Spirit transforms every moment and every task into a spiritual experience.

Admit it, you have no idea what the newest fundamental belief really teaches. I'll confess that the main reason I decided to blog on this belief was to get motivated enough to buy the new fundamental beliefs book and read it for myself. Out with the classic creme hardcover and in with a paperback version which just doesn't feel the same but surely will in about ten years.

The purpose of the Bloggin the 28 series is to focus on the practical, social implications of each belief which inherently provides the critique that the fundamental beliefs as currently written have some great theology but little practical, social emphasis. The newest fundamental belief is part of the church's attempt to address the critique inherent in this bloggin the 28 series. The new belief is very well written and in many ways reads like a sermon. The reader is urged to accept Christ's sacrifice which means that they will die to self daily and live a life of spiritual growth which they outline the hallmarks of.

I found it very interesting that the belief places a huge emphasis on the death of Jesus while barely referencing how he lived his life. There is no doubt that the Cross stands as the central event in the life of the Christian but if we forget about his life, we can lose sight of how we are supposed to live as Christians today. Unfortunately, I believe this happens all too often and is why so many Christians seem to be missing the point when it comes to following Jesus. By only focusing on the sacrifice of Jesus, Christianity can devolve into little more than a self-help religion that's all about “me and Jesus.” However, when we focus on both Jesus' life and death, we find that while the sacrifice of Jesus is intensely personal and life changing, that life change compels us to live a life of service and sacrifice for others. The new belief definitely stresses the importance of living in love and sacrifice but I believe it's power and effect would be greater if it focused a little more on Jesus' life as opposed to only his death.

Following the example of Jesus' life is what “growing in Christ” is all about. The new belief provides seven hallmarks of growing in Christ: a life of the Spirit, a life of love and unity, a life of study, a life of prayer, a life of fruit-bearing, a life of spiritual warfare, and a life of worship, witness, and hope. All of them provide excellent principles and focus on key spiritual disciplines. At the same time, a greater emphasis could have been placed on the importance of social action and helping those in need. Jesus most closely identified with the broken and hurting and if we do the same, we will experience dramatic growth in Christ as we see the world through his eyes and serve with his hands. Jesus himself stood up in the temple and announced his mission as he read from the scroll of Isaiah and pronounced,

"The Spirit of the Lord is on me,
because he has anointed me
to preach good news to the poor.
He has sent me to proclaim freedom for the prisoners
and recovery of sight for the blind,
to release the oppressed,
to proclaim the year of the Lord's favor." (Luke 4:18-19)

The way Jesus lived his life and the lessons he taught were always intensely practical and had immense social implications. Jesus' approach to ministry and faith was grounded in the principle that life change occurs best when people start trying to live right before necessarily believing right. A correct understanding of core beliefs about God will eventually come but participation in the kingdom of God can begin before that. Embracing this principle will be a paradigm shift for our churches but is one that is necessary if we are going to facilitate “growing in Christ.” Explaining the Trinity should occur while your study group is providing job training at a local homeless shelter. The Sabbath taught while promoting social justice causes. We learn beliefs and principles in the midst of doing, not before.

The Adventist church has probably stressed believing right at the neglect of practical spirituality. However, we're all looking to find balance within the tensions of the life of faith and the new belief reveals a strong step in the right direction. To close, I'll share my favorite quote from the new belief:

“At the foot of the cross the ground is level. All are brought together—and nothing divides humanity anymore. A new brotherhood is launched. A new fellowship begins. East merges with west, north comes down to south, white shakes hands with black, rich leaps over to clasp the hands of the poor. The cross bids all to the fountain of the blood—to taste the sweetness of life, to hare the experience of grace, and to proclaim to the world the emergence of a new life, a new family (Eph. 2:14-16). Thus the cross initiated victory over Satan and sin, and consequently, brought new life in Christ” (153).

AMEN.

Beauty of Diversity

noreply@blogger.com (trevan) — Tue, 06 Mar 2007 03:50:00 +0000

One of the things I love about the church plant is it's diversity. One of my passions in life is cultivating cultural diversity in organizations. I'm thinking seriously about doing a PhD in cross-cultural dynamics and helping facilitate greater understanding amongst different cultural groups. The church plant is going to provide some excellent experience.

We have just started a Portuguese ministry in the church. There is a large Brazilian population in Richmond and we even have a Brazilian church. However, a group of Brazilians have been a part of FWESDA for years and decided to really reach out to the community. They started a ESL class on Tuesday nights, have Bible Studies on Friday Nights, and now have begun having a sermon in Portuguese. Basically, we are all together in the service until after the children's story, then they split for their own sermon. It's been working pretty well so far and we'll have to see what the future holds. After church this last week, Shari and I ate with a large group of them and had a great time.

That evening, we went to a farewell party for a Filipino woman who is heading back to the Philippines. We enjoyed some pancit and then karaoke. The people literally had a whole room dedicated to Karaoke. It was a lot of fun.

So, I'm loving it all but also seeing the challenge. There is little interaction between the cultural groups outside of church. Everyone is friendly with each other and get along well but when it comes to socialization, the different cultural groups split and stick together. Yet, I'm finding that the common ground is the kids. They all get along well and enjoy Sabbath School together and really is the common bond uniting the groups. However, we must do more to get the adults together in more meaningful ways. Any suggestions?

The Key to Quality Ministry

noreply@blogger.com (trevan) — Fri, 23 Feb 2007 18:45:00 +0000

I've been on the job around 2 months now and there is still A LOT to learn. Nearly every day I learn another key lesson that will help me through pastoral life. So far major mistakes have been avoided but are sure to come. Despite all this, I really believe I've found the key to quality ministry. It's nothing profound or new but is very basic: visitation.

There is nothing like going to someone's home and talking with them. I've found that people are much more willing to open up and share their personal lives because they are in a comfortable environment. It shows them that you care about their lives and lays the groundwork for a deeper relationship and partnership for the future. Every family I've visited has been profoundly thankful and appreciative of our time together and it's been one of the most rewarding aspects of my ministry so far.

I know that visits are expected when you first arrive in a church but not as much as the years pass by. However, I hope and plan on making visitation a regular part of my weekly schedule because of how meaningful it is to everyone involved.

The Advent Struggle -- Part 2

noreply@blogger.com (trevan) — Sun, 04 Feb 2007 18:05:00 +0000

There's been a lot of excellent discussion on the previous post. I've stayed out of it for the most part to let everyone else let their thoughts be known. I thought I would write another post explaining my thoughts in a little more detail.

There has been some discussion over this issue of style versus theology (At least at the very beginning). I think I might have used that terminology and I want to clarify that I reject the false dichotomy of style VERSUS theology because our style and methodologies REVEAL our theology. The methods we use to present a message tends to reveal as much about the message as the message itself.

In no way do I believe that all young adults want praise music, full band, nice lyric graphics projected, etc. However, I think that the 90% (no real data just a guesstimate) of Adventist churches who think of that worship style as being from the devil reveals one of the major issues at the heart of the crisis -- The Adventist response to culture.

The traditional stances on lifestyle issues are not withstanding the test of time and frankly they should not. In fact, it's these very stands which have been a cause for skepticism about the entire Adventist package. Some of the lifestyle "truths" which most young adults reject include:

1. The movie theater is an evil place.
2. There is something inherently wrong with jazz, rock, hip hop, etc music.
3. It's wrong to play cards.
4. Any form of party is sinful.
5. Playing on any competitive sport team is wrong.

I'm sure there is more that I'm leaving out but I think those represent some of the key lifestyle stands that simply do not resonate with the majority of us. When these lifestyle issue are elevated to the level of doctrine, as they often have, it immediately calls into question the entire package. It leads young adults to believe that Adventism is a cultural relic of the past with no relevance in today's world. While the above guidance might have been culturally relevant in the past, today's context calls for new approaches on these issues. We don't greet each other with holy kisses, wear head coverings to pray, or go to a city to witness with no money or food and rely on people helping us as was instructed in the Bible. Why not? We've had to do the hard work of contextualization and found that new approaches were necessary. It doesn't diminish the inspiration of the guidance for that time but is simply the result of our living incarnationally in 2007.

I guess that leaves us with the question: Can Adventism survive while changing it's traditional stands on lifestyle issues that have been a major part of Adventist culture? My guess: If it can't, Adventism will be relegated to the history books.

The Advent Struggle

noreply@blogger.com (trevan) — Wed, 31 Jan 2007 21:53:00 +0000

I've been trying to write this for literally a month but haven't been able to. Not sure why but it just hasn't flowed. So, here's the attempt:

On a regular basis, I hear from or about friends who have stopped going to church. There are numerous reasons why they are leaving but one common thread seems to be a feeling that church has become meaningless. They've felt this for a long time but kept going because they hoped it would get better or just because they'd feel guilty if they didn't. But, they aren't going to play the game anymore. The young adult exodus out of the church isn't news to really anyone but there's something important that I think will make this crisis be more severe.

When you examine recent Adventist history, there have been several crises of faith including EGW and Inspiration, Desmond Ford, and Creation/Science (to a small degree). What are the characteristics of all of them?

1. They are based on a doctrinal position and are very theological in nature.
2. The official response has been to confirm the conservative position, clearly define what the "truth" is, and seek to vilify and exclude those who disagree with the official position.

How does this affect our present situation? First, the church hasn't had to deal with a crisis of methodology and lifestyle. We've taken on the theological issues but not the issues that are affecting young adults. We are largely unprepared and/or unwilling to address them. Second, the kind of responses to those theological issues will not suffice for today's issues. There needs to be a broadening and openness to new articulations of faith and life as an Adventist. The response must seek to be as inclusive as possible and not seek to provide labels that are used to exclude and divide.

There is no magic bullet that will answer and cure all the issues. However, there is an attitude adjustment that might help us move forward. The church has long touted our unity as a world church but perhaps this is what's holding us back. We've sought to have a unity of sameness. Instead, we need to explore how we can more effectively provide a unity within diversity. This will allow for fresh expressions of faith and Adventist culture while still embracing what unites us as a world-wide body of believers.

(SEE JOHNNY'S DIALOGUE WITH THIS POST HERE)

The Tensions of Preaching

noreply@blogger.com (trevan) — Mon, 22 Jan 2007 13:52:00 +0000

This weekend I preached for the first time at Patterson. It went well and Shari actually said it was the best sermon I've ever preached. I don't know if I'm willing to go that far but I was happy. When I think about preaching, there are a few tensions that I keep in mind.

1. Humble while Confident

You can't enter the pulpit thinking you know it all but you also can't go in thinking you have nothing to say. The preacher should be humble enough to realize that while the Holy Spirit has lead the preparation, there is always more to learn and different perspectives to explore. Henry Wright, my preaching professor, told us that when we preach we need to have confidence in two things: your preparation and the Holy Spirit.

2. Hidden while Myself

I can't stand when the preacher gets up to pray, "Lord don't let people see me but you." Yet, it is a valid prayer and desire (I think I'm just tired of hearing it). The preacher shouldn't get in the way of what God wants to do yet we must authentically be ourselves at the same time. The preacher's personality and character in many ways determines how the message will be received. So while we should try to be "hidden," we must realize that God has empowered us to reveal who he is and we must do it in ways that fit who we are and what God has done in our lives.

3. Grounded in Ancient Scripture while Revealed in Present Realities

The hard, yet fulfilling, work of interpretation demands that we stay grounded in what has been revealed in Scripture. However, we must also interpret our present realities so that the 2,000+ year gap can be bridged and who God is will continue to be revealed.

The First Few Days

noreply@blogger.com (trevan) — Fri, 12 Jan 2007 03:02:00 +0000

While the Dems have been taking control of Congress, I've been taking Richmond by storm.

After spending around 19 straight years in school, I finally was confronted with the real world. I love school and studying but towards the end it was wearing me down. You can only talk and think while taking little action for so long. Theory needed to be supplemented by action.

I honestly had and still have no idea what to expect. Living in a new city, buying a home for the first time, and serving as a full-time pastor on a multi-staff team are all brand new experiences for me. The scheduled and regimented world of class, tests, and grades to objectively assess performance have been a source of comfort and normality that has been completely thrown out.

What now? Well, I've learned a few things about pastoral life in my first two weeks:

1. Names, Names, Names. Unfortunately for me, they tend to go in one ear and out the other. I definitely am not gifted in this area. I think learning names reveals that you care so I'm very committed to it but it's VERY difficult. Anyone know a good trick?

2. People love you when you start. Who knows how long the honeymoon will last but everyone has been extremely supportive and welcoming. I truly feel loved and that people want us to be around.

3. No more nights. I have just completed my fourth night out in a row. Monday was board meeting. Tuesday was Pastor's meeting with new Conference President. Wednesday was prayer meeting. Thursday was school board meeting. It's not a big deal since Shari isn't working yet but if she was working a 9-5 I wouldn't have see her until 9 every night.

4. Scheduling. I'm so used to having my schedule be laid out for me. Class schedules have ruled my life for years but now I don't have that. I really have to be disciplined with my time and make sure that I maximize the time Shari will be at work so when we're both home, we can have quality time together.

5. Speaking, Speaking, and More Speaking. Half of your job is about sermons, worship talks, and Bible studies. Worship services, board meetings, prayer meetings, pastor's Sabbath School all demand some sort of talk or lesson. How am I going to keep the well from running dry?

Done

noreply@blogger.com (trevan) — Fri, 15 Dec 2006 23:26:00 +0000

Well, I'm done with the MDiv. The time went by really fast which was definitely a good thing. As with anything, some things could have been better, others worse. I'm glad to have it out of the way and now it's time for the real world after 18+ years of school.

The two things I'm most proud of from my time at Seminary:

1. Not losing a toe to frostbite (Click here for picture. I was going to put one in but it's really gross and not for everyone).

2. Not getting a ticket from Campus Safefty (aka Veggie Cops)

As I said before, I'll be an Associate Pastor in Richmond at the Patterson Ave SDA Church and their church plant, Far West End SDA Church.

We are in the process of buying a house and if everything goes according to plan, we'll close on January 2.

So, life is coming together very nicely for us. Shari will begin the always stressful job hunt but it seems like Richmond has a thriving job market. In the meantime we'll get settled into our new city and home.

Faced With Hypocrisy

noreply@blogger.com (trevan) — Sat, 09 Dec 2006 23:21:00 +0000

You're probably ready for a blistering attack on a church or church member. Sorry, it's all about my own hypocrisy.

I'm reading The Art and Craft of Biblical Preaching for a class. It's a compilation of articles on preaching from people such as Haddon Robinson, Bill Hybels, Rob Bell, etc. It's a good resource. Well, I came across an article by none other than Ted Haggard. My first reaction? Skip over this, whatever he wrote has been discredited by his recent behavior, no need to waste time.

As I thought about it, that initial reaction really disgusts me. If we are going to talk about being discredited by sin, no one is worthy of listening to. I would hope people wouldn't tune me out because of the selfishness, judgmentalism, and pride that I oftentimes exhibit. Why shouldn't I extend the same grace to Haggard that I hope to receive for myself?

All or Nothing

noreply@blogger.com (trevan) — Thu, 30 Nov 2006 14:02:00 +0000

Rick Warren is throwing a huge HIV/AIDS Conference that starts today. I'm really excited about the new attention and focus on AIDS that this will bring to Christians. But then, zealous Christians end up stealing the spotlight and the positive attention this Conference can bring by creating this tension.

The problem: Barack Obama is scheduled to speak and he shouldn't be able to because, "You cannot fight one evil while justifying another." This evil is his pro-choice position. So, if you disagree on one point with a particular Christian community, you are completely disqualified from speaking or helping that group? Let's not forget that Obama is himself a Christian.

This all or nothing ideology is unfortunately present in many Christian communities. It turns church into an elitist club of only the precious few who have the whole truth. Self-righteousness and self-promotion rule the day and everyone not in the group is an outsider who is seen as the enemy.

I'm just glad that God doesn't treat us this way. If God held an all or nothing standard there would be no Christians living today. What if God banished us from a relationship with him if we believed something wrong about him? If we sinned just once? We'd all be lost.

Thank God that the prayer, "I believe, help my unbelief" is accepted by Him.