<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Chuck Blakeman</title>
    <description>Chuck Blakeman, owner of the Crankset Group (cranksetgroup.com), writes about small business.</description>
    <link>http://chuckblakeman.com</link>
    <atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/tnwBlog" /><feedburner:info uri="tnwblog" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><item>
      <title>264 banks on the wall, 264 banks...I’ll...</title>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>Banks blow chunks when it comes to small business support. Everybody knows it (including the bankers).  But every once in a while one of them has an entrepreneurial spasm and supports a great idea.  It just might be yours.  But only if you&#8217;re relentless.</p> <p>John McCormack, author of my favorite &#8220;motivational&#8221; book &#8211; <a href="http://amzn.to/wrGkL3"><em>Self-made in America,</em></a> went to 265 banks trying to get a loan to open a hair salon in a mall in the 1970s &#8211; an unheard of proposition then. No bank was biting.</p>
<p>He called his wife after the 265th and told her he was going to open a Tex Mex restaurant because the banks were all offering him money for that.  She told him go ahead, but reminded him that Walt Disney had gone to 302 banks before the 303rd gave him money for his ridiculous idea to open an amusement park in the suburbs of Los Angeles.</p>
<p>John decided he would keep trying until he went through 302 banks before opening a Tex Mex.  The next day the 266th bank gave him the money.  He now owns many locations and makes $200k+  a year in profit from each one.</p>
<p>In 1989, John wrote this in &#8220;Self-Made in America&#8221; about banks:</p>
<blockquote>
<p><em>Bankers are by nature conservative bean-counters, and entrepreneurs are, by definition risk-taking bean-planters. I&#8217;ll make my point simply: can you point out a banker or a bookkeeper who has ever started anything on his or her own &#8211; other than trouble?</em>&quot;</p>
<p><em>Banks in this country are bureaucratically stacked against the entrepreneur or the original thinker, and our country&#8217;s economy is paying dearly for it.  Bankers love to write checks to companies with track records, because they don&#8217;t do any work to do it, but as we can well document many of those &#8220;safe loans&#8221; made in the last decade have been nothing short of foolhardy.  To this day, I worry more about my bank going broke than I do about myself going broke.</em></p>
</blockquote>
<p>That&#8217;s a guy who, 23 years ago might as well have been talking about the banks of the last five years.  Nothing has changed.</p>
<p><strong>I am not a victim</strong><br />
So how did John McCormack respond to this well-known fact?  He kept going. He was relentless. He didn&#8217;t let this keep him from reaching his dreams.  John knew what I say all the time:</p>
<p>Circumstances don&#8217;t make me who I am. How I respond to them, does.</p>
<p>90% of life is what I make happen. 10% is what happens to me. Are you a victim of the banks, or a victor who will find the one bank who is having an entrepreneurial spasm and will work with you?</p>
<p><strong>Relentless</strong><br />
What made McCormack keep going?  In his own words:</p>
<blockquote>
<p><em>It wasn&#8217;t brains, brawn or even our business plan that resulted in our ultimate success. It was persistence, pure and simple.</em></p>
</blockquote>
<p>I call it being relentless, a form of <a href="http://chuckb.me/x2">conation.</a>  I&#8217;m not smart, I&#8217;m just relentless.  You don&#8217;t have to be smart, just relentless.</p>
<p>Keep hunting. A good idea will <span class="caps">ALWAYS</span> get money if you need it, even if it takes you being relentless.  And if your idea can be proved without big money, even better. Prove it first, then go get the money.  Either way, relentless beats smart every day.</p>
<p>Just keep counting banks, you might end up with a better story than Disney or McCormack. If you get to the 304th bank before you get your loan, write a book about it!</p>]]>
      </description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 09:41:00 -0700</pubDate>
      <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/tnwBlog/~3/US3s76QfTkk/264-banks-on-the-wall-264-banksill</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://chuckblakeman.com/2012/2/texts/264-banks-on-the-wall-264-banksill</guid>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://chuckblakeman.com/2012/2/texts/264-banks-on-the-wall-264-banksill</feedburner:origLink></item>
    <item>
      <title>Consistency, Consistency, Consistency</title>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>Most business owners don&#8217;t practice their craft, they just perform it. It&#8217;s one of the biggest reasons their business never develops into something bigger than themselves.</p> <p>Cal Ripken performed in a record 2,632 consecutive baseball games. But he didn&#8217;t just perform. He dissected the strike zone into a number of smaller zones and practiced hitting pitches in each micro-zone to figure out which ones he could hit and which ones he should just hope the ump called a ball instead.  He practiced at levels most people don&#8217;t bother.</p>
<p>I chatted with Yo Yo Ma, the greatest cello player of our time, backstage a few years ago. I asked him in front of my daughter, an aspiring cello player, &#8220;How do you become a great cello player?&#8221; He replied without hesitation, &#8220;It&#8217;s not enough to practice. You have to learn to love to practice and to practice every day as if you were on stage at Carnegie Hall.&#8221;  Yo Yo Ma loves to practice, not just perform.</p>
<p>Theo Bikel first played Tevye in Fiddler on the Roof in 1967. He is now 87 years old and still works full time in many roles. He has played Tevye now over 2,000 times in 45 years.</p>
<p>In the 30th anniversary Broadway tour revival of Fiddler I was playing clarinet/sax in the pit orchestra when they came through Denver. For a week I listened to Bikel&#8217;s incredible rendition of Tevye (couldn&#8217;t see from the pit, only hear). By the fifth or sixth performance I could nearly repeat his rhythmic interpretation of each line, the rising, falling, the long pause here and there.  He became incredibly predictable.</p>
<p>Every performance was the same, but the amazing part was that every performance was magical. Theo Bikel was not winging it and was not just performing.  He had practiced this part and dissected it over and over again to discover the highest interpretation, then he did something few business owners (or actors) would ever do &#8211; he stuck with what worked and never varied from it.</p>
<p><strong>Practice, then be consistent</strong><br />
I&#8217;ve never heard a more consistently repeated performance, or a better one.  Theo Bikel had learned two things:</p>
<p>1) Practice, and lots of it, is the only way to become better. Performing is not how you become better.<br />
2) Stick with what works.  Don&#8217;t mess with success.</p>
<p><strong>Learn to love to practice</strong><br />
Most business owners will never have a chance to stick with what works.  They&#8217;ve never practiced enough to find out what truly works and what truly puts them on top of their game.  They&#8217;re too busy winging it.</p>
<p>And even when they find something that works, most business owners will abandon it long before it has stopped working. Why? Because <span class="caps">THEY</span> are bored!</p>
<p><strong>Learn to love consistency</strong><br />
They hate practicing and get bored doing the same great performance over and over.  They are willing to sacrifice the success of their business so they can keep performing with variety and never practicing to find the best way to do something. Remember, your customer, like each theater goer watching Theo Bikel, is experiencing you for the first time.  They aren&#8217;t bored and you shouldn&#8217;t be either.</p>
<p><strong>Practice to find your groove</strong><br />
A great golfer practices until they find the swing groove that works the best all the time, and they never vary from it.  You could look at shadow figures of some of them and know who it is by their swing (like Jim Furyk).  They practiced like crazy to find it, and then do it the same every time.</p>
<p>I went from a 20 handicap to a 1.9 by practicing like crazy. While I was doing that I played (performed) with a lot of golfers who had never been on a driving range or taken a lesson. They thought it was a nutty idea to practice a lot, almost beneath them, and prided themselves in hacking around, never practicing, always trying a new club, a different swing.</p>
<p>They&#8217;re still 20 handicaps and hide their incompetence by poking fun at people who practice.  It&#8217;s not manly &#8211; real men don&#8217;t practice. They laughingly say, &#8220;Practice is a sign of insecurity.&#8221; Too many business owners feel the same way.</p>
<p>Want to be successful? Reach your tipping point?  Have the business outgrow your own capabilities and become something that makes money while you&#8217;re on vacation? It won&#8217;t happen by performing.</p>
<p><strong>The way to Carnegie Hall</strong><br />
The tourist leaned out his car window and asked the cop, &#8220;How do you get to Carnegie Hall?&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Practice, practice, practice.&#8221;, was the answer the cop gave, as he waved they tourist through.</p>
<p>Repeatable, consistent performance is the key to a business outgrowing you and your own talents. And the only way to find what your business should do over time is to practice until you find it.</p>
<p><strong>Variety is not the spice of business</strong><br />
Practice like crazy, learn the best way to do what you do, then do it that way every time.  Variety is not the spice of life &#8211; it&#8217;s the road to mediocrity.</p>
<p><strong>Silver bullet, anyone?</strong><br />
This blog post won&#8217;t likely get a lot of hits. There has to be a faster, easier silver bullet.  The people who think that will still be 20 handicaps in their business 10 years from now, while those willing to practice hard will actually be enjoying themselves on the golf course while they&#8217;re business makes money without them.</p>]]>
      </description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 15:27:00 -0700</pubDate>
      <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/tnwBlog/~3/bMlNMseiWCc/consistency-consistency-consistency</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://chuckblakeman.com/2012/1/texts/consistency-consistency-consistency</guid>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://chuckblakeman.com/2012/1/texts/consistency-consistency-consistency</feedburner:origLink></item>
    <item>
      <title>Stop trying to achieve balance</title>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>Balance is another lousy Industrial Age artifact. Successful people don&#8217;t live a balanced life.  They don&#8217;t want one, either.  Want a successful life? Stop seeking balance.</p> <p>When a teeter totter is perfectly balanced, nothing is happening. Both people are sitting there in mid-air staring at each other wondering if anything interesting is on the horizon, slowing realizing that what they are experiencing is not worth getting on the see saw for.  Sound like fun?</p>
<p>Welcome to the life the Industrial Age wanted us to live. We were taught to find the &#8220;balance&#8221; of the three &quot;Ss&#8217; of the Industrial Age &#8211; safety, security and stability/predictability and live unremarkable, highly balanced lives.</p>
<p><strong>Full Engagement, not Balance</strong><br />
Successful people don&#8217;t seek balance, they seek full engagement with whatever will make them successful. It&#8217;s not about balance, but about full engagement. People having the most fun on a teeter-totter are fully engaged and always out of balance.  If you&#8217;re not fully engaged and are paralyzed in the pursuit of balance, expect to hit bottom hard.</p>
<p><strong>Work Less Time, More Fully Engaged</strong><br />
I&#8217;m not advocating being a workaholic.  Plenty of research shows that workaholics spend 12 hours a day at work but only invest 6-8 hours in actually getting something done.  You can get almost as much done in half the time if you&#8217;re fully engaged. What I&#8217;m advocating is full engagement in whatever needs the highest and best use of your time right now. Balance would say take lots of breaks and stretch it over 12 hours.  Workaholics live balanced lives that usually don&#8217;t lead to success.</p>
<p>Loehr &amp; Schwartz wrote a book called <a href="http://amzn.to/A50nok">The Power of Full Engagement.</a>  They had it right by recommending that we make sure we develop each major area of our life &#8211; mental, physical (exercise/diet), emotional, spiritual, and the productive output of work and play. And if we don&#8217;t, we will atrophy and be much less likely to build a successful business.</p>
<p><strong>Get More Done in Less Time</strong><br />
Too many business owners go into business immediately looking for a &#8220;lifestyle business&#8221; &#8211; assuming that they can step right in working 3-4 days a week so they can be &#8220;balanced&#8221;.  Success almost never comes that way.</p>
<p>When I started Crankset Group five years ago I worked 6 1/2 to seven days a week for almost a year. I exhibited the same kind of imbalance in starting five other businesses in the previous 20 years.  Five years later I work 3 1/2 days a week and take the 4th week off each month. But I got there gradually over the five years, and it was the willingness to go nuts and be completely unbalanced on the front end that allows me to be unbalanced now in the direction of free time.</p>
<p>Momentum doesn&#8217;t come through balance.  You burn a lot of fuel on take off. An airplane burns up to 50% of its fuel just getting to its cruise altitude.</p>
<p><strong>Shoot for Next Year, Not Tomorrow</strong><br />
Full engagement is tied directly to wanting the best in the long term, not right now, and wanting it badly enough to go nuts, all in &#8211; abandoning anything that the Balanced Life folks would recommend.  I didn&#8217;t get to 3 1/2 days of work and the last week of the month off by living a balanced life.</p>
<p>And I don&#8217;t live one now. Instead of celebrating Thanksgiving, I went to Kenya for a week to work with some business owners and encourage them to build a business that makes money while they&#8217;re on vacation. I flew for two days, had 2 1/2 days on the ground and flew back for two days.</p>
<p>I was totally out of balance the whole time.  I switched to Kenyan time the morning of my flight, getting up <span class="caps">VERY</span> early. And on the plane there I didn&#8217;t eat breakfast food when served because it was dinner time in Kenya, slept during Kenyan time when it was daytime on the plane, etc.  And I did the same thing on the way back.</p>
<p>Being completely out of balance while everyone else on the flights was comfortable allowed me to overcome 80% of the jet lag and hit the ground running both in Kenya and when I got back.</p>
<p><strong>Rest With Full Engagement</strong><br />
I rarely sit around during that fourth week and seek &#8220;balance&#8221;. The fourth week of May I&#8217;ll be on a week long bike trip in Corsica, riding 60-100 miles a day for six straight days, drinking wine at night &#8211; completely out of balance. (Somebody else might lay on a beach the whole time &#8211; totally unbalanced.) Go off the grid while you do it.</p>
<p>Stop seeking balance. Find something to throw yourself at and do it with everything you have. Then take a break from that and throw yourself at something else just as hard (playing with your kids, another business, writing a book, etc.)</p>
<p><strong>How to Live a Life That Matters</strong><br />
Live a committed, fully engaged, unbalanced life.  As Margaret Thatcher, who lived an unbalanced life, said, &#8220;One&#8217;s life should matter.&#8221; If you live a balanced one, yours won&#8217;t.</p>
<p>I love my teeter-totter life.  If you don&#8217;t have one, don&#8217;t expect to be successful.</p>
<p>Get a teeter totter life and start having more fun!</p>]]>
      </description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2012 11:22:00 -0700</pubDate>
      <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/tnwBlog/~3/9TGVIVluur8/stop-trying-to-achieve-balance</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://chuckblakeman.com/2012/1/texts/stop-trying-to-achieve-balance</guid>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://chuckblakeman.com/2012/1/texts/stop-trying-to-achieve-balance</feedburner:origLink></item>
    <item>
      <title>Attitude actually ISN’T everything.</title>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve heard it all my life. Your attitude determines your altitude, attitude is everything, attitude is a choice, etc. Good luck with that. It sounds like a big fake &#8220;grind&#8221; to me. And I&#8217;m certain it won&#8217;t make you successful.</p> <p>People aren&#8217;t successful because they have a good attitude.  They have a good attitude because they have something much deeper figured out.  Attitude is a <span class="caps">RESULT</span> of something much bigger.  If we don&#8217;t have the bigger thing, ginning up a great attitude is like lipstick on a pig.</p>
<p><strong>Emotionalism is Not a Good Attitude</strong><br />
People with great attitudes that aren&#8217;t backed by the bigger thing are usually pretty obvious.  They&#8217;re convinced that attitude is everything, so they rely on emotionalism and &#8220;everything is <span class="caps">GREAT</span>!&#8221; &#8220;live is wonderful&#8221; statements on the outside while they&#8217;re dying on the inside.  And they just hope that &#8220;fake it until you make it&#8221; will get them through.  It won&#8217;t.</p>
<p>It impossible to have a good attitude by deciding to have a good attitude. It&#8217;s like squinting hard to make a wad of bills appear in front of you. At times I do have to &#8220;just decide&#8221; to have a good attitude, but I guarantee you I would have no motivation to make the decision if it wasn&#8217;t driven by something bigger.</p>
<p><strong>The Fourth &#8220;S&#8221;</strong><br />
The Industrial Age taught us the &#8220;Three S&#8217;s&#8221; &#8211; Safety, Security and Stability. The problem with the three S&#8217;s is that they are at the bottom of Masloew&#8217;s hierarchy &#8211; they are just survival mechanisms. The Three S&#8217;s will not give us enough motivation to have a great attitude.  The fourth S, the one the Industrial Age couldn&#8217;t afford for you to have &#8211; Significance &#8211; that is the driver of attitude.</p>
<p>Clarity on what you want out of your business and your life is what drives good attitude.  If you know where you are going, what you want when you get there, and when you want to be there, it will have a transformational impact on your attitude.</p>
<p><strong>The Big Why</strong><br />
In Crankset Group we talk a lot about <a href="http://chuckb.me/xCD">&#8220;The Big Why.&#8221;</a> The Big Why is that one big thing that gets you out of bed every morning that gives you the motivation to create a life of significance.  If you have a Big Why, you will rarely have to work on getting your attitude straight, and when you do lose it, it will be much easier to get your good attitude back.  It&#8217;s not about good attitude, but about having the motivation to have one.</p>
<p><strong>Attitude is a Result, Not a Cause</strong><br />
Focus on Significance, not on attitude. Figure out what is really deeply important and run toward it with everything you&#8217;ve got.  Use your business to get you there. You&#8217;re attitude will follow.</p>]]>
      </description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 08:26:00 -0700</pubDate>
      <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/tnwBlog/~3/o6zSuWvXbwQ/attitude-actually-isnt-everything</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://chuckblakeman.com/2012/1/texts/attitude-actually-isnt-everything</guid>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://chuckblakeman.com/2012/1/texts/attitude-actually-isnt-everything</feedburner:origLink></item>
    <item>
      <title>A day a week, a week a month, a month a year.</title>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>Last February I wrote about our Business Maturity Date and how &#8220;<a href="http://chuckb.me/x2ghU">You get what you intend, not what you hope for.</a>&#8221;. It&#8217;s been almost a year &#8211; what did we get? We got a life.</p> <p>I built five businesses where I never got a life.  In some cases I got a lot of money, in others very little, but in none did I get a life.  Why?  Simple.  I only asked our businesses to produce money, so that&#8217;s exactly what they did.</p>
<p>When I started this sixth business, <a href="http://CranksetGroup.com">Crankset Group,</a> five years ago, I decided (intended) to do it differently. I decided I would demand that my business produce both time and money for me, not just money.  Gee what a surprise, I got both.</p>
<p><strong>Three Jeers for the Industrial Age</strong><br />
The Industrial Age taught us to assume a number of stupid things related to this idea of time:</p>
<p>1) Money is the path to a great lifestyle. If I have money, I will automatically have a great life (time). Wrong. I know a woman who makes nearly $1 million a month who feels trapped by her business and is there at least six days a week.  Money buys you stuff, but it doesn&#8217;t buy you time.</p>
<p>2) To make more money, you must spend more time at work &#8211; you have to trade hours for money. Wrong. Read my blog post, <a href="http://chuckb.me/xT">Time is the new money.</a>  The game every business owner should play is, <strong>&#8220;How do I make <span class="caps">MORE</span> money in <span class="caps">LESS</span> time?&#8221;</strong></p>
<p>3) Make money now. Get time later. Wrong. See #2 above &#8211; get both at the same time. Retirement is a really bad concept because it taught us to wait until &#8220;tomorrow&#8221; to get time.  It also taught us that money would get us time &#8211; see #1 above, and read my blog post <a href="http://chuckb.me/xhk8">Retirement is a Bankrupt Industrial Age Idea</a> .</p>
<p>So after five failed attempts at doing it the Industrial Age way (get money, time will naturally follow), we decided to do it differently and demand that our business give us both time and money at the same time.</p>
<p>What happened?</p>
<p><strong>Money</strong><br />
We started in 2007 and grew revenues every year. We grew 122% from Dec. 2009 to Dec. 2010, and 57% from Dec. 2010 to Dec. 2011, and expect to grow another 50% in 2012, which is harder to do the bigger you get.</p>
<p><strong>Time</strong><br />
We worked our tushes off to begin with. In 2007 I probably worked 6+ days a week, but <span class="caps">ALWAYS</span> with the mindset that I was front loading it to get a lot more time off later. In 2008 I probably got 2/3rds of my Saturdays off and took a couple very short weeks off. In 2009, I got most Saturdays, a few 3-day weekends and two weeks of real vacation. In 2010, I took eight to 10 three-day weekends, and a couple weeks of vacation.</p>
<p>In 2011 we broke through on the time front. I took a day a week (Fridays), a week a month (the 4th week of every month), and a month a year (half Feb, half March) off. How did the business do? We grew revenues by 57%.</p>
<p><strong>Bonus</strong><br />
I intended to get a day week, a week a month and a month a year, but I also ended up with half days two Mondays a month. So I regularly have a three to three and a half day week, with the 4th week off.  All this while expecting to grow at least 50% in 2012. I expect the people working with us to take more time off in 2012, too.</p>
<p>Is what I did special? Am I lucky, unique or uber-talented? No. I&#8217;m not any smarter or any different than I was in the first five businesses where I never got a life.</p>
<p><strong>Make New Rules</strong><br />
The difference was simply that I made new rules (He who makes the rules wins), and required that my business play by my business, not the other way around.</p>
<p><a href="http://chuckb.me/x2ghU">You get what you intend not what you hope for.</a></p>
<p><strong>Not smart. Relentless.</strong><br />
It&#8217;s about chasing something you decide is important enough to finally catch. I decided time was important enough to catch. It turns out relentless is much more important than smart.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not smart. I&#8217;m just relentless.</p>
<p>Be relentless about demanding that your business produce both time and money for you.  You probably already did a spreadsheet on how to increase your revenue.  That&#8217;s only half the objective. Get a spreadsheet this year for how you plan to reduce your work time &#8211; and be relentless about making it happen.</p>]]>
      </description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2012 08:10:00 -0700</pubDate>
      <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/tnwBlog/~3/LET7XS9yms4/a-day-a-week-a-week-a-month-a-month-a-year</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://chuckblakeman.com/2012/1/texts/a-day-a-week-a-week-a-month-a-month-a-year</guid>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://chuckblakeman.com/2012/1/texts/a-day-a-week-a-week-a-month-a-month-a-year</feedburner:origLink></item>
    <item>
      <title>New Year’s Resolutions Don’t Work</title>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>The last New Year’s resolution I made was 20+ years ago, and it was to never make another New Year’s resolution.  It’s the only one I’ve ever kept.</p>
<p>We do it every year.  “I hereby resolve”… blah, blah, blah.  A kept resolution is harder to find than a moose in Miami.</p> <p>97% of people who decide to lose weight actually weigh more 12 months later. All other New Years &#8220;resolutions&#8221; have just about as much resolve behind them. Let&#8217;s change that.</p>
<p>How to actually change something.</p>
<p>1) <strong>Don’t &#8220;get motivated&#8221;</strong>. Don&#8217;t make resolutions at the end of a weekend motivational seminar.* Most of this stuff is emotion-based and has no lasting power. You’re either committed or you aren’t. I don’t get motivated to brush my teeth. I either do it or I don’t.</p>
<p>2) <strong>Run toward something, not away from something</strong>. People who want to lose weight rarely lose any. &#8220;I want to stop being fat.&#8221; That&#8217;s running away from being fat.</p>
<p>People who want to live a healthy long life are much more likely to not be fat.  &#8220;I want to be able to&#8230;&#8221; That is running toward something.</p>
<p>The gravitational pull of what you are running away from will always suck you back in. Likewise, the gravitational pull of something you are running toward will release you from the pull behind you.  You will get where you are going because you are actually going TO something, not <span class="caps">AWAY</span> from something.  See my post &#8220;Get a Second Planet&#8221;:</p>
<p>3) <strong>Make decisions through the new lens</strong>. See yourself and/or your business the way you want it to be when you get there, not where it is, and make decisions AS IF <span class="caps">YOU</span> <span class="caps">WERE</span> <span class="caps">ALREADY</span> <span class="caps">THERE</span>.</p>
<p>In the book <em>Shift</em> by Peter Arnell, he tells how he went from being 406 lbs to a maintenance weight of 150 lbs.  As soon as he decided to lose the weight, he began to see himself from that moment on as a 150lb. man, and <span class="caps">EVERY</span> <span class="caps">DECISION</span> HE <span class="caps">MADE</span> was as a 150lb. man.  He even went out that week and fired some of his clients who he felt were the clients of a 406lb. man.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t &#8220;hope&#8221; to get there.  Peter didn&#8217;t wait until he was 150lbs. to begin to make decisions like a 150lb. man.  That would be &#8220;hoping&#8221; to get there, and running away from being fat. The minute he made the decision he was already 150lbs. on the inside.</p>
<p>Be there already inside, and just bring the rest of your external world into alignment with the way you already view the world from inside.  Sound like woo-woo crap?  It&#8217;s not &#8211; it&#8217;s hard core success strategy, and it&#8217;s how every highly successful business person becomes so.  They see something they want to make happen, they believe in their core that it is doable, and then they set about making every decision as if it has already happened.</p>
<p>The above three steps are all about intentionality vs. hope.  Intention is the key because:</p>
<p><strong>You get what you intend, not what you hope for.</strong></p>
<p>New Year&#8217;s Resolutions are almost always too full of &#8220;hope&#8221;, which is emotion-based and needs a special day to get itself motivated to do anything. Real decisions are usually full of intention and don&#8217;t need a special day or audience to be walked out into the open.</p>
<p><span class="caps">BUT</span> &#8211; I will say that whatever decision you make, on whatever day you make it, you should indeed declare it to the world and ask everyone around you to support you, not in getting there, but in already being there (please don&#8217;t feed me donuts if I&#8217;ve declared I&#8217;m 150lbs., and don&#8217;t entice me with 2 weeks in Cabo the day after I start my new business.)</p>
<p><strong>Don&#8217;t get there.  Be there.</strong> Then bring the outside world into alignment with that clear intention. Hoping, wishing, dreaming, and believing don’t add up to doing.</p>
<p>Go ahead. Make a decision <span class="caps">ANY</span> day of the year (including New Year&#8217;s Day).  But much more importantly, see yourself, your business, and the world around you through the new lens, and make every decision going forward as if you were already there.</p>
<p>Where do you want to be in 2012? Tell the world here, be there inside today, and then let&#8217;s go do it on the outside the next 364 days.</p>]]>
      </description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 01 Jan 2012 08:21:00 -0700</pubDate>
      <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/tnwBlog/~3/2ndzXnhlYHg/new-years-resolutions-dont-work</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://chuckblakeman.com/2012/1/texts/new-years-resolutions-dont-work</guid>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://chuckblakeman.com/2012/1/texts/new-years-resolutions-dont-work</feedburner:origLink></item>
    <item>
      <title>New Year Planning? Do as little as possible.</title>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>Annual planning, the way we&#8217;ve been taught, is largely fortune telling and a waste of time. Plan more effectively by doing less of it.</p> <p><strong>What We Were Taught</strong><br />
- Go away for 2-3 days in January to plan the year. <br />
- Plan everything in as much detail as you can; growth strategies, budget, purchases, hires, leases, etc., etc.<br />
- Follow the plan &#8211; don&#8217;t deviate &#8211; people who deviate won&#8217;t be successful.<br />
- Wait until next January to do it again.<br />
- Put it on a shelf with your &#8220;shelf-help&#8221; books &#8211; it&#8217;s only real value is to help your shelf look good.</p>
<p>If strategic planning was important for the new year, you would do it in December, not in January. And we wouldn&#8217;t wait 12 months to do it again.  If you let your &#8220;strategy&#8221; degrade to the point that you only have one day of &#8220;strategy&#8221; left when you get back to it next January, it&#8217;s not a strategy, just an exercise you go through.</p>
<p>And following it faithfully is just a dumb idea. During one of my short stints at trying to be an employee I wrote the <span class="caps">CEO</span> an email in October requesting 10 new workstations and 20 employees (double-shifts) to handle growth.  The next day he wrote back and said he had checked the annual plan I submitted in January, and that I had not requested those capital expenditures in the &#8220;plan&#8221;.  Request denied.</p>
<p>They went bankrupt three years later, slavishly following their silly annual plans and rearranging the deck chairs in the business all the way down.</p>
<p><strong>It&#8217;s Counter-Intuitive</strong><br />
Giant Corporation, Inc. taught us that we should try to capture everything in an annual plan &#8211; the more detail we go into, the more likely we are to be successful. I did enough of those to know it&#8217;s nonsense (and surveyed a few thousand business owners who say the same thing).</p>
<p><strong>Only sweat the big stuff &#8211; the 12-3-1 Plan</strong><br />
All you need to capture is the four-to-ten big things that you need to do this coming year.  That&#8217;s it. Write them down. I guarantee you that if you capture the very few, very important things you need to accomplish this year, you are <span class="caps">MUCH</span> more likely to actually get them done than if you attempt to capture <span class="caps">EVERYTHING</span> that needs to be done this year.</p>
<p>Once you have these, develop what we call a 12-3-1 Strategic Plan. 12-months, 3-months and 1-month, a third of a page for each.  You don&#8217;t need anything more than this.</p>
<p><strong>12-Month Objectives</strong><br />
Put your four-to-ten 12-month Objectives for next year on the top 1/3 of a page (spreadsheet, word doc, doesn&#8217;t matter), That&#8217;s typewritten in an 11 pt. font, with lots of spacing. Don&#8217;t cheat.  The more you capture, the less you will do. Simple beats complex every time.</p>
<p><strong>3-Month Action Plan</strong><br />
Take each one of these 4-10 Objectives and decide what you have to do in the next quarter to get them done in a year. Put them on the middle third of the page &#8211; keep it short!!</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t wait until next November to get started.  That&#8217;s why both diets and business plans don&#8217;t work.  Tomorrow never comes.  Cut the elephant into smaller bites and get a sense of urgency.</p>
<p><strong>1-Month Action Plan</strong><br />
Take each quarterly action plan/objective and divide it once again into what you need to do in January to accomplish the first quarter&#8217;s objectives. These take up the bottom third of your page. Don&#8217;t cheat &#8211; if you can&#8217;t fit it comfortably on one page, you have too much detail.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t wait until March. Annual and quarterly objectives can be daunting, but picking away month-by-month will make them doable.</p>
<p><strong>Strategic Only!</strong><br />
Don&#8217;t put anything in your 12-3-1 Plan that helps you make money this month; just things that will help you build a business that creates more time and money next year.</p>
<p>&#8220;Buy a copier&#8221;, &#8220;Replace retiring employee&#8221;, &#8220;Sign contract w/ xxx, Inc.&#8221; &#8211; none of these belong on your plan.</p>
<p>&#8220;Move to new location&#8221;, &#8220;Hire/train someone to replace a piece of me&#8221;, &#8220;Increase revenues by xx%&#8221;, &#8220;Go from 60 hrs/wk to 30hrs/wk while increasing profits&#8221; &#8211; these are great annual planning objectives.</p>
<p><strong>Monday</strong><br />
Every Monday morning look at the bottom 1/3 of the page and decide what you need to do that week to accomplish that month&#8217;s action plan. Block the time that week to get it done.  If you do this every week, you will knock out the monthly action plan.  If you knock out each month, you will accomplish the quarterly objective, and if you do that four quarters in a row, you will have had a great year.</p>
<p><strong>Details? We don&#8217;t need no stinkin&#8217; details!</strong><br />
If you keep it simple, you will only have to work out real details in a real world each week/month.  If you try to capture all the details for the year when you put together the plan, you will be solving ivory tower problems &#8211; most of which will never happen.  And you will miss half the problems you will actually face.  So don&#8217;t solve problems/details until they are real.  They are never real in January when you did your planning (see above request for 10 workstations).</p>
<p><strong>Quarterly 12-3-1 Plan</strong><br />
This is the big key. Don&#8217;t do an annual plan anymore. Do a quarterly one.  Every quarter your 12-month plan will have deteriorated to only 9 months.  April 1, push it back out to 12 months on the top 1/3 of the page, then use that to re-populate the 3-month (middle third) and the 1-month (bottom third), and then get after it again each Monday.</p>
<p>Simple beats complex every time.  If you capture everything, you&#8217;ll do nothing.  If you capture the few big things, you might actually do some of them.</p>
<p>You can buy our Strategic Plan template along with our Lifetime Goals and Process Mapping templates and detailed instructions for each on our book site &#8211; <a href="http://makingmoneyiskillingyourbusiness.com/#toolkit">Making Money Is Killing Your Business</a> .</p>
<p>Or just grab a sheet of paper and get it done.</p>
<p>By the way, it shouldn&#8217;t take you more than 2-4 hours to do it, because you get to tweak it every week, every month, and every quarter.</p>
<p>Relax. Just get moving on the big stuff and the rest of it will unfold as you move.</p>
<p>Have a great year! (one week at a time)</p>]]>
      </description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 19:58:00 -0700</pubDate>
      <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/tnwBlog/~3/F8-_82IRffI/new-year-planning-do-as-little-as-possible</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://chuckblakeman.com/2011/12/texts/new-year-planning-do-as-little-as-possible</guid>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://chuckblakeman.com/2011/12/texts/new-year-planning-do-as-little-as-possible</feedburner:origLink></item>
    <item>
      <title>Get a Second Planet</title>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>We waste a lot of time and money trying to fix our problems. Working on your problems is generally a bad idea if you want to be successful.</p> <p>It&#8217;s counter-intuitive, but you&#8217;ll fix more problems by focusing on solving where you&#8217;re going, not on what you&#8217;re experiencing.</p>
<p>The best way to stay stuck is to work really hard on the problems in your business and invest a lot of time and energy in how hard those problems are.</p>
<p><strong>Re-describe or re-write your future.</strong><br />
Instead of focusing on the problems you&#8217;re experiencing, get a clear picture of where you are going and when you want to be there. Three years out, 12 months out, 3 months out, the end of this month.  Do it backwards like that (start with the three-year end in mind) and focus on re-describing the future without the problems you&#8217;re experiencing today.</p>
<p>I use our <a href="http://chuckb.me/xrPv">2pg. Strategic Plan process</a> to do this.  Having a clear picture of where you want to be 12 months, three months, and one month from now focuses you on <strong><span class="caps">WHERE</span> <span class="caps">YOU</span> <span class="caps">ARE</span> <span class="caps">GOING</span></strong>, instead of on <strong><span class="caps">WHERE</span> <span class="caps">YOU</span> <span class="caps">HAVE</span> <span class="caps">BEEN</span>.</strong></p>
<p><strong>Working on Problems is Working on Your Past</strong><br />
The best way to become an alcoholic is to focus all your time and energy on not being like that person in your life who was an alcoholic.  All your focus is on the very thing you don&#8217;t want to happen, which makes it much more likely to happen.</p>
<p>Why do some business owners seem to have problems all the time? Too often it&#8217;s because they are focused on problems instead of on getting somewhere successful.</p>
<p><strong>Get a Second Planet!</strong><br />
If there were only one planet in the universe and you used a powerful rocket to get 10 million light years away from it and ran out of fuel, what would happen?  You would get sucked back in &#8211; it&#8217;s the only center of gravity in your universe.</p>
<p>But if there was just one other planet in the universe, 20 million light years away, and your rocket got you 10 million light years and one inch away from the planet behind you, what would happen?  You would have all the momentum you need to get to the next planet.</p>
<p>When we try to move away from things, they eventually suck us back in. When we have somewhere big we need to get to, we are much more likely to be successful.</p>
<p>Stop focusing on your problems. They keep you tied to your past.  Instead, focus all your time and energy on where you want your business to be in three years, 12 months, 3 months and next month, and focus all of your &#8220;solving&#8221; skills on that, not on your present problems.</p>
<p><strong>We&#8217;ll All Be Killed</strong><br />
In one day last week we unexpectedly lost all our office and meeting space, and our weekly Business Leaders Insight lunch site.  We were homeless as a business.</p>
<p>We only had two weeks to replace it all, including Christmas and New Years.  Instead of focusing on this &#8220;problem&#8221;, we focused on what situation would best help us get where we&#8217;re going, and assumed right away that the change would be better for us and our clients.</p>
<p>Within four business days Krista Valentine, our Chief Results Officer had found new office and meeting space that is a big upgrade from what we had and a weekly lunch place for our <span class="caps">BLI</span> lunches that everyone is gaga over &#8211; it&#8217;s better than any we&#8217;ve had in the five years we&#8217;ve been doing this weekly event, and for less money than people have paid in a few years.</p>
<p>This isn&#8217;t surprising.  First, Krista rocks. Second, we weren&#8217;t focused on our problem [Problem &#8211; we don&#8217;t have a place to call home or to hold our biggest weekly public event anymore].  Instead we were focused on re-writing our future; creating a new narrative for what we were doing going forward [Future &#8211; what a great opportunity to upgrade both to better match our brand!].</p>
<p>We have places we want to be three years from now, 12 months from now, three months from now.  And because of that, we were focused on creating success this month that helps us build that future success.</p>
<p>Focusing on problems is a focus on your past, even if they are in the present.  Focus instead on what your future looks like without them, then build that future.  You&#8217;ll be surprised how many &#8220;problems&#8221; become opportunities.</p>
<p>Every day we are faced with opportunities cleverly disguised as obstacles.  Life and business is 10% what happens to us and 90% what we make happen.</p>
<p>Redescribe your future (next week/month/year) and run toward it with everything you have.  Run toward something, not away from something.  You&#8217;re much more likely to get there.</p>]]>
      </description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2011 18:40:00 -0700</pubDate>
      <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/tnwBlog/~3/ku_rqM1mgwE/get-a-second-planet</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://chuckblakeman.com/2011/12/texts/get-a-second-planet</guid>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://chuckblakeman.com/2011/12/texts/get-a-second-planet</feedburner:origLink></item>
    <item>
      <title>Do What You Love? Maybe Not.</title>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>Do what you love and you&#8217;ll never work a day in your life?  Wrong &#8211; do what you love and you&#8217;ll be on the treadmill the rest of your life. There&#8217;s a better way.</p> <p>People who passionately love what they do are supposed to be the most successful and the happiest. It makes sense, except I have trouble finding the happy and successful ones.</p>
<p>The are plenty of people who do what they love.  I think most business owners start their business with this statement: &quot;Wouldn&#8217;t it be great if I could just make money doing&#8230;[fill in the blank].  Violin makers, doctors, plumbers, dancers, designers, lawyers &#8211; there are people in just about every vocation that are doing it because they couldn&#8217;t see themselves doing anything else.</p>
<p>But more often than not, these passionate people are less likely to be successful or happy in their chosen careers than their more utilitarian counterparts in the same vocation.  Why?</p>
<p><strong>Endless Love</strong><br />
People who love what they do have the most serious issues with control, lack of vision, and other big picture issues. When we love what we do so much, we&#8217;re pretty sure:</p>
<p>- there is no one else who can do it better<br />
- it will be too hard to train someone else to do it<br />
- my customers need ME<br />
- I find my self-worth in being needed (co-dependent)<br />
- I tried employees and they suck<br />
- I don&#8217;t have the money to get anyone else involved<br />
- Once I have enough money, I&#8217;ll hire someone<br />
- I can&#8217;t seem to make enough money to hire someone<br />
- etc., etc., blah, blah, blah.</p>
<p><strong>Excuses, Reasons and Priorities</strong><br />
Mrs. Fields found someone else who could make cookies. Charles Schwab found somebody else who could trade stocks. A dog walking company went from $0.00 to $10 million a year in just two years without the founder ever walking a dog.</p>
<p>People who love what they do tend to be the main producer, if not the sole producer in their business.  If you are that necessary to production, you will be on the treadmill the rest of your life. The producer-owner doesn&#8217;t really get to go on vacation, even if they physically leave for a week or two &#8211; the business follows them.</p>
<p>The producer-owner has the weight of the world on their shoulders.  It&#8217;s all up to them.  And they can&#8217;t think of a way to get off this treadmill.</p>
<p>There really aren&#8217;t any reasons not to get off the treadmill. There aren&#8217;t even excuses.  As my mother used to say, &#8220;Chuck, there aren&#8217;t any excuses, there aren&#8217;t even reasons, there are just priorities.&#8221;</p>
<p>If you can&#8217;t think of a way to get off the treadmill, it&#8217;s because it&#8217;s not important enough for you to get off.  I don&#8217;t intend to be mean here, just truthful.  The fact is that no matter what profession or vocation you have taken up, I could find you someone who has gotten off the treadmill and is no longer the main producer, doing exactly what you are doing.</p>
<p><strong>A Thousand Ways Not to Leave Your Love</strong><br />
If you think about it, there are 1,000 ways to not get off the treadmill. You won&#8217;t even have to look hard to find them.  And there may only be a half dozen that will actually get you off the treadmill.  <strong>You only need one.</strong>  If you focus on the 1,000, you&#8217;ll be buried in ways to not get a life.  But if getting off the treadmill is a real priority, you will figure it out.</p>
<p>By the way, you don&#8217;t have to fall out of love with what you do. In fact, if you build a business that makes money when you are not around (produces revenue without you), you can do the one thing in that business that you love anytime of the day or night that you want to do it.  Ironically, the people who have the most freedom to do what they love are those who were willing to get others to it for them first.</p>
<p>Do you think it&#8217;s impossible for you to get off the treadmill? Are you one of the thousands of business owners I&#8217;ve met over the years who have a &#8220;unique&#8221; or &#8220;special&#8221; circumstance that makes them the one exception who can&#8217;t get off the treadmill?</p>
<p><strong>I&#8217;m not smart. I&#8217;m just relentless.</strong><br />
I take every Friday off and the last week of every month. I get to choose what to do on those days.  While building my first five businesses I didn&#8217;t get this kind of freedom or anything like it.  Then I made it a priority.  Gee, what a surprise, I get Fridays and the fourth week off now.</p>
<p>As Henry Ford said, <strong><em>&#8220;Whether you think you can, or you think you can&#8217;t, you&#8217;re right.&#8221;</em></strong></p>
<p>What&#8217;s your priority? You don&#8217;t have to tell anyone. It will just show up in what you do. If it&#8217;s a priority to get off the treadmill, you&#8217;ll do that.  If it&#8217;s not, stop whining and pretending that it is.</p>
<p><em>&#8220;Do. Or do not.  There is no try.&#8221;</em> Yoda</p>]]>
      </description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2011 13:44:00 -0700</pubDate>
      <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/tnwBlog/~3/1Rtkz_7tj_c/do-what-you-love-maybe-not</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://chuckblakeman.com/2011/12/texts/do-what-you-love-maybe-not</guid>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://chuckblakeman.com/2011/12/texts/do-what-you-love-maybe-not</feedburner:origLink></item>
    <item>
      <title>Always release your product before it is ready.</title>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>Want to be successful? Get your product or service out there now, not after you&#8217;ve refined it and made it good. The <span class="caps">MBA</span> programs are wrong. Get moving.</p> <p>Facebook sucked when it first went live and changed almost daily.</p>
<p>Google was a bare bones search engine called BackRub in 1996 and was still simplistic when it became Google in September 1998.</p>
<p>The Denver &#8220;T-Rex&#8221; redo of the entire highway system was 25% completed and open for traffic before the design was even completed.</p>
<p>The only way to learn how to run a four-minute mile is to first run something much slower, in public.</p>
<p>To learn to ride a bike, first, fall off.</p>
<p><strong>Committed Movement</strong> &#8211; It&#8217;s never how good your plan is that counts, but how committed you are to moving on the bad plan you&#8217;ve got.</p>
<p><strong>Purposeful Direction</strong> &#8211; We don&#8217;t need to know <span class="caps">HOW</span> we&#8217;re getting to our objective, we just need to know what our objective is, and the next few steps in the right direction to get there. Purposeful Direction is not about having things figured out first, but simply knowing with utter clarity where you want to end up.</p>
<p><strong>Committed Movement In a Purposeful Direction is more critical to success than anything else.</strong></p>
<p>There is a fundamental lesson about life and business in the above statement, and how we take that lesson on board makes us either very successful, very average, or a real shipwreck.</p>
<p>Successful people understand that planning is like a rudder; it’s useless without movement.  Highly successful people have a very clear, transformational understanding of the relationship between movement and the rudder.</p>
<p>If you get your relationship right between these two, it will transform your life and your business as well.  If you don’t, you’ll stay grounded on your sandbar and wonder why your life never had the impact you’ve always known it can.</p>
<p>The idea of massive pre-planning before you start seems to be a very sound practice, but only in concept and in business school.  The problem is it just doesn’t match up with the reality of what actually makes for a successful business.</p>
<p>In the last three years I have watched four different companies go through the whole focus group/product development/perfect rollout process that most <span class="caps">MBA</span> programs and books about success would tout as the right way to do things.  They all failed.  I&#8217;ve seen others become successful by just getting moving in a small way like Facebook, Google, eBay, the sticky note, the television, the car, the internet, the steam engine, and all parents, all of which had a better chance of success by releasing the product before it was ready then by perfecting it first.</p>
<p><strong>A controlled experiment in the real world</strong><br />
The key is to do it with very few customers who love you and want to work with you to make it what it will someday become. Reality is a much better laboratory for business than the laboratory. Customers are a much better focus group than a focus group.  And a small rollout to the faithful is much less expensive and more informative then the balloons and parade approach.</p>
<p>We went through many iterations of paid workshops and mastermind concepts for three and half years before we arrived at 3to5 Clubs, which are now spreading on four continents. But we did it in small groups where perfection wasn&#8217;t necessary and everyone of the faithful were served with our existing but under-developed product.</p>
<p><strong>Speed, not Planning</strong><br />
Success is much more closely related to Speed of Execution than to in-depth planning, because most planning is done in a vacuum prior to actually producing anything.  Only after the plan hits the real world do we find out that it doesn’t work in that real world.</p>
<p>In the face of that reality and all the evidence we have that massive pre-planning is a waste of time, we keep trying.  We can’t help ourselves. Hope springs eternal.  In the meantime the Facbooks, Googles, and T-Rexs of the world are in their boats running flat out and heading for open water while we’re still trying to decide how to build the rudder.</p>
<p>Man has yet to devise a great way to plan in the absence of movement.  The painstaking detailed analysis we are all taught to do before we move is almost always of little value because it never works out the way we had hoped.  And as a result it never saves us the time and money it was supposed to.  Instead it usually costs us precious time getting started, puts us behind someone else who has decided to get moving, and creates soaring costs down the road.</p>
<p><strong>Practice, not Perfection</strong><br />
Always roll out your product or service long before it is ready, before your website is done (we only had a holding page for the first 18+ months). Just do it in a controlled but very real and &#8220;live&#8221; environment where the feedback you get is from real live bullets &#8211; people deciding to pay with real money and giving you feedback on how to get better.</p>
<p>Get out of the lab and into the real world.  Tom Watson, founder of <span class="caps">IBM</span> said, &#8220;Test fast. Fail Fast. Adjust Fast.&#8221; I would say get out into the real world and just keep practicing to get better all the time.</p>]]>
      </description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 03 Dec 2011 08:20:00 -0700</pubDate>
      <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/tnwBlog/~3/8JqdCTslC_Q/always-release-your-product-before-it-is-ready</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://chuckblakeman.com/2011/12/texts/always-release-your-product-before-it-is-ready</guid>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://chuckblakeman.com/2011/12/texts/always-release-your-product-before-it-is-ready</feedburner:origLink></item>
    <item>
      <title>Relationships. Not Marketing.</title>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>While I was in Kenya last week I met with a new friend for a few hours to discuss his need to bring in new clients.  He was thinking he might need to do some marketing. I suggested he forget marketing and talk to his friends instead.</p> <p>The tactics of &#8220;old marketing&#8221; still live on out there.  When we need to bring in new customers our first reaction is that we should start calling, mailing or emailing people in our target market. I was re-reading some of Seth Godin&#8217;s book, <em>Meatball Sundae</em>, while on the plane and was reminded again that when we interrupt people without them asking us to, we start out on the wrong foot.  Getting their permission to talk with them is just so much better.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s no different in Kenya.  My electrical engineering friend was thinking he should go after the companies that would be good clients and see if he could get some conversations going with them. It seems reasonable and most of us would start there.</p>
<p>We sat in a coffee shop and came up with a different approach.  Rather than call, email, or show up and ask to talk to someone, we decided that in just about every instance, he could get permission before he ever talked to any of these possible customers.</p>
<p>How? Talk to his friends and existing customers. Really. Just talk to them and ask them to make introductions.</p>
<p><strong>Four Steps to New Clients</strong><br />
At first he thought that they might not have the right contacts or that they wouldn&#8217;t want to help. But as we talked it through he realized it was the best, quickest way to expand his customer base significantly.  Without spending any money on expensive &#8220;interruption marketing.&#8221;  Just cups of coffee.</p>
<p>1) We first defined his target market &#8211; what did his ideal client look like and from what segments of the market?  We narrowed it down to just a few.</p>
<p>2) Then we made a horizontal list across a napkin of the types of people who could find him those customers.  We listed mechanical engineers, building contractors, business lawyers, commercial real estate agents and others who would already have contacts with his ideal customers.  We added to the horizontal topics categories like &#8220;existing clients&#8221;, &#8220;past clients&#8221;, &#8220;friends&#8221; and &#8220;raving fans&#8221; because they might all know someone who a) could refer him to a client or b) actually know a possible client themselves.</p>
<p>3) Once we had the horizontal list on the napkin, his job was to go back to the office and list every person and company he knew in each category (mechanical contractors, friends, customers, etc.).  This was going to be dozens if not a few hundred people and companies.</p>
<p>4) We then decided on a measurable activity and objective because <strong>you get what you intend, not what you hope for</strong>. He decided he would be able to have 6-8 cups of coffee a week and I asked him to set objectives for how many new customers and how much new revenue he intended to get from the coffees (don&#8217;t have lunch &#8211; it costs too much and takes too long).</p>
<p><strong>Getting the Conversation Going</strong><br />
We talked about the best way to motivate these people to work with him &#8211; do for them what he wanted them to do for him.  For his close friends he could simply ask them to help.  Most of us won&#8217;t do this &#8211; we think we&#8217;re bothering them.</p>
<p>Even though we would love to help our friends, we&#8217;re not so sure about asking them to help us.  He didn&#8217;t seem to have this common hang up.  If you do, get over it.  People want to help us and you need to ask for that help. Too often we assume they would already be sending people our way if they wanted to, but you have to realize they have a life and you are not in the center of it.  They need you to get a cup of coffee and help them focus on it for 45 minutes. They are glad to help, they&#8217;re just not focused on doing so.  Help them help you.</p>
<p><strong>Be What Yout Want Them to Be</strong><br />
To communicate the &#8220;do for them what we want them to do for us&#8221; message right up front, my friend was going to say something like, &#8220;I&#8217;d like to get together to see if we can push each other forward. Since we work in the same space, I might have clients you want, you might have clients I want. Would you like to see if we can help each other?&#8221; I&#8217;ve only had a couple people ever turn me down.  Anyone who turns this down the opportunity to be mutually helpful to each other isn&#8217;t someone you would not want to do business with anyway.</p>
<p><strong>Three Questions to Ask</strong><br />
After small talk and asking other questions about their business, we had three questions he would ask:</p>
<p>1) Strategic Alliance &#8211; Do you know one person who might have the same customers as I do who might want to build an ongoing strategic relationship with me so we can pass clients back and forth for years to come? (and if appropriate, &#8220;would you want to do that together with me?&#8221;  Would you introduce me via a mutual email or even a phone call?</p>
<p>2) End Client Referral &#8211; Do you know one person at any of these target market companies who you could introduce me to who might have a project I could be on?</p>
<p>3) Do you know one other person who might be interested in having a cup of coffee with me over this kind of possible strategic alliance?  Would you introduce me?</p>
<p>Friends want to help us, and the smart ones that don&#8217;t know us real well are highly attracted to the idea of having strategic alliances.  And when all of the connections are made by someone else introducing us, it&#8217;s all by permission.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve never made a cold call in my life and was the #1 sales person in a bunch of companies, some of whom had people making cold calls all day long.</p>
<p>Build relationships by asking people you already have a relationship with to help you.  But most of all, help them first.  A picture is worth a thousand words.  If you want them to refer to you or build a strategic alliance with you and send you clients, do it for them.</p>
<p>People buy from people, and they buy more from people they know and trust.  If you build relationships you will make more money than if you interrupt people with fancy and expensive marketing.</p>
<p>Get out there and have a cup of coffee with someone you already know &#8211; it just might change your business.</p>]]>
      </description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2011 09:23:00 -0700</pubDate>
      <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/tnwBlog/~3/4uzQnt6YJkI/relationships-not-marketing</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://chuckblakeman.com/2011/11/texts/relationships-not-marketing</guid>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://chuckblakeman.com/2011/11/texts/relationships-not-marketing</feedburner:origLink></item>
    <item>
      <title>Complexity is paradigmatically iniquitous, nocent and peccant.</title>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>3&quot; binders and 6 CDs usually signify a lack of effective content. We desperately want complexity and fancy stuff to solve our business problems.  Good luck with that.</p> <p>We use something like 1-2% of all the features on our software.  <a href="http://chuckb.me/xX4">A fighter pilot would turn off most of his systems</a> going into battle in the Gulf War because the complexity was confusing and dangerous.  We love to respond to offers to build giant business plans and three-day workshops on the 57 things you need to implement for a successful marketing program. And we spend months analyzing opportunities to death while other people are moving on them.</p>
<p>We&#8217;re addicted to complexity.  We can&#8217;t help ourselves.</p>
<p>If there is anything less than 6 CDs we&#8217;re pretty sure the offer isn&#8217;t going to help us. But real-live business tells us something different.</p>
<p>Simple kicks butt every time, but only when you do it. The reason we love complexity is that it allows us to hide from the fact that the things that make us successful are simple acts of intention that will move us forward.  Make a phone call, respond to a client, thank a stakeholder (employee), listen, ask a question.</p>
<p>The biggest reason we don&#8217;t like simplicity is that the simple things are hard to do.  They are simple, but that doesn&#8217;t make them easy.  Making that phone call is really simple, but I avoid it because it might result in someone not liking me or creating work for me.  It&#8217;s simple, but hard.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, the complex things are actually easy to do. Developing a fancy excel spreadsheet showing how successful I would be if I every did anything.  Research stuff to death before we move on it. Developing a killer website. Conducting focus groups, endless market research, telephone surveys, PR polls, hall tests, online hybrid surveys.</p>
<p>Sure these things were hard for me the first time.  But then I learned how to do them and how to avoid actually being effective by doing them a lot.  And they became easy.  But other people are still impressed by the grasp I have of all this complexity and how much time I spent getting it all figured out.  Heck, I&#8217;m even impressed with myself.</p>
<p>But complexity almost never tells us what we want to know and rarely makes us successful.</p>
<p><strong>The Few, The Important</strong><br />
In each business there are a very few simple things that will make us successful. We need to strip out all the dumb stuff that we&#8217;re reacting to on an every day basis, stop fooling ourselves that we&#8217;re being effective, take the bull by the horns, be proactive, and do something simple that will push us forward.</p>
<p>Successful people have a knack for stripping out the complex and focusing on the simple things that will make us successful.  Be that guy.</p>
<p>The simple things are hard to do.  The complex things are easy to do.</p>
<p>The simple things are where we make money.  The complex things are where we hide.</p>
<p>Hang this sign in your office:</p>
<blockquote>
<p><strong>Am I hiding right now?</strong></p>
</blockquote>
<p>The best route in life is always simple, but rarely easy.</p>]]>
      </description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2011 09:27:00 -0700</pubDate>
      <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/tnwBlog/~3/7mcx5SQ2xVY/complexity-is-paradigmatically-iniquitous-nocent-and-peccant</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://chuckblakeman.com/2011/11/texts/complexity-is-paradigmatically-iniquitous-nocent-and-peccant</guid>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://chuckblakeman.com/2011/11/texts/complexity-is-paradigmatically-iniquitous-nocent-and-peccant</feedburner:origLink></item>
    <item>
      <title>There is another level above win-win.</title>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>There are a lot of ways to lead. I aspire quite imperfectly to only one of them.</p> <p>Some leaders lead from &#8220;win-lose&#8221; &#8211; I&#8217;m going to win at your expense.  I need you to lose so I can win.  I had a boss once who built his business on this principle. He was a sad, insecure and unpopular man.</p>
<p>Some leaders lead from &#8220;lose-win&#8221; &#8211; I&#8217;m co-dependent on you &#8211; you can suck the life out of me and I&#8217;ll let you do it. I&#8217;ve never had this boss but I&#8217;ve seen them in action.  They let everyone around them run over them all the time.  They are worn out as a lifestyle and nobody respects them.  They make no lasting impact in the world around them.</p>
<p>I believe most leaders lead from &#8220;win-win&#8221; &#8211; they work hard to set up environments where both the owner/leader and the stakeholder/employee will win. Each of them winning is dependent on the other one winning. I&#8217;ve had this boss a number of times and they are a pleasure to work with and for.  I always wanted to work harder for them.</p>
<p>Some leaders take it to yet another level.  What if you decided that, as the leader of the business, you didn&#8217;t need to win anymore?  What if your focus was now going to be creating win-win environments for others, and that those environments didn&#8217;t involve you having to win or lose?</p>
<p><strong>Be the Board</strong><br />
In their book, &#8220;The Art of Possibility&#8221;, which I read a number of years ago, Zander &amp; Zander called it &#8220;be the board.&#8221; Most of us choose to be one of the game pieces and interact with the other game pieces on the board.  When we interact with the other game pieces, we have a choice to create win-lose, lose-win, or win-win for the two of us.</p>
<p>But at the highest level of leadership we can live at a whole different level and remove ourselves from the game altogether. At the highest level of leadership we decide to focus on connecting this person to that person to create win-win. To do so we become the board on which people play the game of business.</p>
<p>What if you became the board on which people played the game of business, or even the game of life? What would that look like for you? Do you know someone who lives this way, always creating environments where two other people can win, and then slipping out the back door without taking credit?</p>
<p><strong>Servant Leadership</strong><br />
This isn&#8217;t a new idea.  The idea has been around for thousands of years. Zander &amp; Zander just gave it a great name &#8211; &#8220;be the board&#8221;.  Sometimes it&#8217;s called servant leadership.  A servant leader uses their position to be the champion of making others successful, connecting people to opportunities and to other people who will all win as a result of that third party leader putting them together.</p>
<p>Zig Zigler said, &#8220;You will get all you want in life if you help enough other people get what they want.&#8221;  Jim Rohn said, &#8220;Whoever renders service to many puts himself in line for greatness.&#8221;</p>
<p>Want to be successful? Make sure you practice win-win.  Want to be a great leader, leave a lasting legacy, and get more out of life than you could possibly imagine? Remove yourself from the win-win equation altogether and become the board on which people play the game of business.</p>
<p>Good leaders create a win-win environment for themselves and for others.  Great leaders make themselves the board and focus on connecting one winner to another winner.  If you do that, you&#8217;ll get to your own goals and put yourself in line for greatness.&quot;</p>
<p>Oh, and it&#8217;s possible no one will ever know you were &#8220;great&#8221; except you.  It&#8217;s part of the joy of being the board. People don&#8217;t have to know you created a small place in this world for others to win.  You know, and isn&#8217;t that it&#8217;s own reward?  It is for those who decide to be the board.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s all decide to be the board on which people play they game of business.</p>]]>
      </description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2011 18:23:00 -0700</pubDate>
      <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/tnwBlog/~3/WohzseugRI8/there-is-another-level-above-win-win</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://chuckblakeman.com/2011/11/texts/there-is-another-level-above-win-win</guid>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://chuckblakeman.com/2011/11/texts/there-is-another-level-above-win-win</feedburner:origLink></item>
    <item>
      <title>Why shelf-help books only help your shelf</title>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>&#8220;That book was great! You should read it.&#8221;</p>
<p>Beware the pursuit of knowledge.</p> <p>The great majority of business books (and other non-fiction) are really just &#8220;shelf-help&#8221; books.  They help your shelf look better.  But they don&#8217;t change anything.  Why?</p>
<p>I get a lot of business book recommendations from people.  When I do, I usually ask them how they have used the book to push their business and/or their own life forward.  What I&#8217;m really asking is, &#8220;Did this book transform something, anything, or was it just intellectually stimulating without changing anything?&#8221;</p>
<p><strong>Head vs. Heart</strong><br />
We&#8217;re addicted to intellectual knowledge, which is only one of the two kinds of knowledge we find in most dictionary definitions of knowledge:<br />
1) Intellectual knowledge &#8211; knowledge of the head.<br />
2) Life/experience knowledge &#8211; knowledge of the heart.</p>
<p>The ancient Greeks had two words for knowledge:<br />
1) Gnosis  knowledge of the head &#8211; the pursuit of information<br />
2) Epignosis &#8211; knowledge of the heart &#8211; the pursuit of transformation</p>
<p>Too many books are based in gnosis, which, by itself, does nothing to make us successful.  The reason we&#8217;re addicted to gnosis, is that head knowledge makes me &#8220;feel&#8221; more equipped to deal with my business, without having to actually do or change anything.  It&#8217;s cost-free.</p>
<p>Consumers flock to the 3-easy step diets, the magical-millionaire website promises and the business book that claims it will get you a 4-hour work week. <a href="http://chuckb.me/xm">Educational institutions are the worst perpetrators of this lie</a> &#8211; you&#8217;ll be richer tomorrow because you know more (gnosis).</p>
<p>Most seminar leaders know you will pay more for a seminar with a 3&quot; binder and 6 CDs than a simpler one that will change your life.</p>
<p><strong>The Trenches of Transformation</strong><br />
The best business books aren&#8217;t informational, but transformational. Very few come from the trenches of transformation, where someone took big risks, put themselves out there, worked hard, sweated through it, and lived to write about it.  I pay a lot more attention to people who have done what they are asking me to do, who are sharing from their experience, not from their head knowledge.</p>
<p>When I was in my early 20&#8217;s people told me I should be writing books. As I was formulating my first book of knowledge created in the ivory tower of my mind, I met a guy who had written a successful book when he was in his late-20s.  He told me he had learned so much through experience that he realized his book was a load of hooey.  But since it was in print, he would live with that mistake the rest of his life.</p>
<p>After that meeting I vowed to not write until I had experienced transformation and knew with my life (epignosis) that it could transform others, too.  As a result, I didn&#8217;t publish my first book until I was 56. The most gratisfying thing about that book &#8211; it was named <a href="http://bit.ly/gYEjkb">#1 Business Book of the Year</a> not for volume of sales, but &#8220;for impact&#8221;.  And people who read it don&#8217;t say, &#8220;that was interesting&#8221;, but &#8220;that changed the way I do business.&#8221;</p>
<p><strong>Stay Away from Gurus and Experts</strong><br />
Research shows <a href="http://bit.ly/tSTSRi">most people don&#8217;t get past page 18 of every book they buy.</a> That makes perfect sense to me because we are not naturally cognitive, we are naturally intuitive, and we know in our hearts that the &#8220;3-easy steps&#8221; book we bought won&#8217;t give us the success it promised.</p>
<p>Are you reading shelf-help books or transformational books? Please recommend your transformational books to others here &#8211; thanks!</p>]]>
      </description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 06 Nov 2011 06:17:00 -0700</pubDate>
      <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/tnwBlog/~3/Nli2PiMARr8/why-shelf-help-books-only-help-your-shelf</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://chuckblakeman.com/2011/11/texts/why-shelf-help-books-only-help-your-shelf</guid>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://chuckblakeman.com/2011/11/texts/why-shelf-help-books-only-help-your-shelf</feedburner:origLink></item>
    <item>
      <title>Dodd-Frank is devastating the Congo right now.</title>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>We have a social enterprise in the DR Congo to end systemic poverty. The opportunities to solve it are at our fingertips. Global Witness and Enough Project, human rights advocacy groups who should be aligned with us, are doing everything they can to stop us.</p> <p><span class="caps">UPDATE</span>: I originally wrote this in August and updated it in November.  Just this week a UN Panel of Experts report came out that verifies the depth of the problem Dodd-Frank is causing for the Congolese people. So far Dodd-Frank has not even been implemented and the result has already been devastating.</p>
<p>We need to continue to put the pressure on groups like Enough Project, Global Witness and the <span class="caps">SEC</span> to admit how destructive Dodd-Frank is in the Congo.  We need them to stop supporting what everyone else has deemed an abject failure and get behind repealing that 1502 clause in Dodd-Frank that has been so injurious.</p>
<p>See the <a href="http://bit.ly/sH1Us9">summary of the UN Panel of Experts report here</a> , then read how you can help change this below.  Original post follows:</p>
<p>DR Congo is the 12th largest country on earth with the 8th most mineral wealth in the ground.  With 70 million people as a workforce and all this latent wealth, it could easily be a first world leader in a very short time.</p>
<p>My Congolese partner &#8211; a Congolese Chief, and I have committed to create infrastructure and sustainable economies in the Congo by exporting agriculture and minerals, and leaving a significant portion of the profits local, something no other company has ever done.  We will also fund and train local business owners to learn how to run businesses. The net effect &#8211; we believe we can solve systemic poverty in the DR Congo in 5-10 years.</p>
<p><strong>The Problem – Dodd-Frank</strong><br />
<strong>But now an obscure provision pushed forward by Global Witness and Enough Project and tucked into the Dodd-Frank Act (Provision 1502) could be jeopardizing much of this, and is already hurting millions of Congolese and putting thousands in immediate danger of their lives.</strong></p>
<p>The provision requires tens of thousands of companies to disclose if their products use minerals from the Congo, and to prove they did not come from criminal militias.  As a result of the unintended stigma this has created, the mineral trade for all of central Africa has evaporated, creating a devastating de facto embargo of the entire region.</p>
<p>We have been trying for months to find buyers for the minerals these Congolese tribes own and have talked to every legitimate smelter and buyer in the world. None are buying Enough Project and Global Witness continue to claim there is no embargo, but we have asked them a dozen times to give us the name of a single buyer of artisanal minerals in central Africa &#8211; they can&#8217;t.</p>
<p><strong>The Negative Effect</strong><br />
If all Congo minerals came from criminals, then Dodd-Frank would make sense. But the fact is that a tiny percentage of Congolese minerals come from criminals in the comparatively small conflict area. The rest are from honest, hard-working chiefs and their tribes throughout the vast Congo, millions of whom, with no connection to the conflict area, have lost their income and have moved from poverty to destitution.</p>
<p><strong>Only the Criminals are Benefiting</strong><br />
<span class="caps">COCABI</span>, <span class="caps">COMIMPA</span> and <span class="caps">COMIDER</span> represent 20,000 miners in the conflict area. The wrote a letter to the <span class="caps">SEC</span> imploring them to not listen to Global Witness or Enough Project who have never even consulted with those most affected by Dodd-Frank, the miners.</p>
<p>While all the NGOs and politicians are quoting each other’s support of this, we are quoting chiefs and tribes who are actually being affected by it, all of whom say Obama’s Law (that’s what they call it) has been disastrous for them and their livelihood. Doesn’t this say something very powerful to us?</p>
<p><strong>The Nuclear Option is Not Acceptable</strong><br />
The World Bank says 10 million people in the Congo get their living from mining, most whom are in regions never connected with conflict.  And even in the conflict region there are 100,000 honest miners who have been moved from poverty to destitution by Dodd-Frank.</p>
<p>Dodd-Frank creates the equivalent of a nuclear option because it is not targeted specifically at the militia, but at minerals.</p>
<p><strong>Demonize Criminals, Not Minerals</strong><br />
This approach is no different than burning down every house in town to stop a burglar from stealing.  Dodd-Frank has burned down the entire mining industry in central Africa in hopes that their scorched earth policy will catch a militia group or two in its path. They are willing to take down every innocent man, woman, and child who live off mining. Such massive collateral damage is not acceptable under any circumstance.</p>
<p>One woman said, &#8220;I used to tend my fields, but women who farm get raped regularly by the militia.  My only safe job is in the mines.  I don&#8217;t know what I will do now.&#8221;</p>
<p>The solution is simple. In an appalling show of weakness, the UN (<span class="caps">MONUSCO</span>) has been sitting around in the Congo &#8220;observing&#8221; the atrocities for 15 years.  They need to grow a spine. The militias are small, rag-tag, poorly organized, poorly led thugs with no significant weaponry. They could be over run in a few days of concerted effort.</p>
<p>If there is no militia, there would be no need to demonize minerals. But if you demonize minerals, the militia will still be there terrorizing, raping and killing.</p>
<p><strong>Global Witness and The Enough Project Are <span class="caps">NOT</span> Advocating for the Congolese</strong><br />
These two NGOs are directly and personally responsible for getting politicians to insert the disastrous 1502 provision into Dodd-Frank. It was well intentioned &#8211; they did not want it to have the effect it&#8217;s having.  But now that they are fully vested in the political side of this provision, they have completely lost their way regarding the Congolese themselves.</p>
<p>They steadfastly refuse to even admit it has had a negative effect, regularly deny the de facto embargo in the face of every statistic and my personal experience, brazenly try to deflect by blaming the opposition for the embargo they deny exists, and worst of all, have now taken to recommending that the Chiefs sell their minerals to human rights violators.</p>
<p><strong>The NGOs Solution? &#8211; Sell to human rights violators and smugglers</strong> <br />
In a conference call with Enough Project&#8217;s main leadership, I was astonished to hear them recommend that we sell to the Chinese, who have one of the worst human rights records on earth and who have no regard for the human rights of the Congolese. A stunning position for a supposed human rights advocacy group.</p>
<p>Global Witness has also lost its way.  In a response to the swell of opposition to Dodd-Frank by those supporting the Congolese people, Global also stunned the advocacy world, supporting Dodd-Frank by pointing to the smuggling of the militia as a good thing, &#8220;<a href="http://onforb.es/tP0VSt">High levels of smuggling&#8230;reflect the reality that mining is continuing</a>&#8221; and is &#8220;<a href="http://onforb.es/tP0VSt">in fact substantially higher because of increased smuggling</a>&#8221;. Truly amazing.</p>
<p>This is incredible. Global wants to stop the militias and yet points to the smuggling of minerals, a common militia tactic, as proof that things aren&#8217;t as bad in the conflict area as everyone says. <a href="http://onforb.es/tP0VSt">Read the Forbes article and my response to it in the Comments section</a> .</p>
<p>Clearly these two NGOs are no longer advocating for the Congolese miners, but for their own reputations which are now fully vested in arranging the deck chairs on the Titanic as Dodd-Frank sinks the Congolese economy.</p>
<p>They are also both in direct violation of the <span class="caps">OECD</span> Guidelines because they have done no due diligence among the miners who are most affected by the colonialistic decisions they want to impose from the outside.  The hypocrisy is beyond the pale.</p>
<p><strong>Advocating for What or Whom?</strong><br />
As Eric Kajemba, the leader of a Congolese civil-society group has said, <em>&#8220;If the advocacy groups aren’t speaking for the people of eastern Congo, who are they speaking for?&#8221;</em></p>
<p>We&#8217;re advocating for the millions of Congolese miners and their families.  Global and Enough stopped doing that a long time ago.  They are so vested in their Dodd-Frank solution that to admit they were wrong now would create serious questions about their expertise in such situations.  Too late &#8211; it already has. The best thing they could do is re-join us in advocating for the Congolese miners and stop pushing forth a political position that creates donors for them while Congolese people starve.</p>
<p>Please write or text them and challenge them to replace their political agenda with advocacy for the Congolese people:</p>
<p>Global Witness<br />
Annie Dunnebacke ADunnebacke@globalwitness.org<br />
Oliver Courtney ocourtney@globalwitness.org<br />
Sophia Pickles spickles@globalwitness.org<br />
Phone: (202) 621-6665</p>
<p>Enough Project<br />
Sasha Lezhnev sasha@enoughproject.org<br />
Jonathan Hutson jhutson@enoughproject.org<br />
Fidel Bafilemba fbafilemba@enoughproject.org<br />
Phone: (857) 919-5130</p>
<p><strong>Contact Your Politician</strong><br />
Contact your local politician and also the following major supporters of this disastrous 1502 provision:</p>
<p>Senator Barbara Boxer<br />
(510) 286-8537 (202)</p>
<p>Senator Chris Coons<br />
Phone: 302-322-1140<br />
Email: info@chriscoons.com</p>
<p>Senator Dick Durbin<br />
(202) 224-2152 &#8211; phone<br />
(202) 228-0400 &#8211; fax</p>
<p><strong>Use Social Media to Get This Changed</strong><br />
Please use your social media network to get this changed &#8211; post the above on Facebook, LinkedIn, and others.  Link to it from Twitter and push people to it via email.</p>
<p>10 Million people are negatively affected, hundreds of thousands have lost their subsistence living, and thousands are in immediate jeopardy of their lives &#8211; all because of Provision 1502.  Please help us correct it immediately. Universal collateral damage to the innocent is simply not acceptable under any circumstance.</p>
<p>Thanks for whatever you can do!</p>]]>
      </description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 05 Nov 2011 08:42:00 -0600</pubDate>
      <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/tnwBlog/~3/WN0fbtIT_DI/dodd-frank-is-devastating-the-congo-right-now</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://chuckblakeman.com/2011/11/texts/dodd-frank-is-devastating-the-congo-right-now</guid>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://chuckblakeman.com/2011/11/texts/dodd-frank-is-devastating-the-congo-right-now</feedburner:origLink></item>
    <item>
      <title>It’s never the process.  It’s always the person.</title>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>McDonald&#8217;s legendary &#8220;process-driven&#8221; business model is touted in Michael Gerber&#8217;s book, the E-Myth, as the central thing you need to succeed &#8211; a system will get you off the treadmill. Problem &#8211; 21.4% of <span class="caps">SBA</span>-funded McD&#8217;s fail.  Huh?</p> <p>We&#8217;re fascinated by “secrets”, “amazing”, “nothing else like it”, “three easy steps”, and other cheap parlor tricks to make us believe something great will happen if we have a special product, process, idea, great market, etc.  It doesn’t work that way.</p>
<p><a href="http://bit.ly/s5eWKc">One out of every five <span class="caps">SBA</span>-funded McDonald&#8217;s franchise fails.</a> Processes are incredibly helpful and I encourage <a href="http://chuckb.me/xbt">Process Mapping</a> as a standard business practice (much different than the McD&#8217;s or E-Myth model). But plenty of businesses have great processes and fail.</p>
<p>We&#8217;re always looking for something outside ourselves to fix our business.  We spend thousands on complex business plans, layers of systems and process manuals, and buying every new marketing gimmick coming down the pike in hopes of fixing our business.  But we’re not going to move the needle with these things.  I put them all in the same category as “shelf-help” books &#8211; it all helps your shelf look good.</p>
<p>I’ve had countless conversations with people about what makes for success or failure, and almost invariably people point to outside forces to explain both of them.  But the keys to success aren’t out there, their in our heads and our hearts.  If we want to lead, succeed, and make more money, we must be transformed.  There is no short cut.</p>
<p>I wince when I see franchises and multi-level marketing companies selling business opportunities by claiming you’ll make more money with them then with the other guy because they have the better product, better commission structure, better marketing, better financing, cheaper entry point, better process, etc.  Then they trot out a few highly successful people to prove their point.</p>
<p>The problem with this is that you could take those same few people and put them in just about any other business and I guarantee you they would be successful there, too.  Why?</p>
<p>Because it’s never about the process, or the product; it’s always about the person.  People who are successful get there because they are relentless, not clever.</p>
<p>I’ve seen people be successful with good or bad products, good or bad processes, good or bad financing, and good or bad marketing.  People who are successful will find a way to be successful in any business. People who aren’t successful expend an awful lot of time looking for the secret sauce, that great product, the perfect situation or anything else they can find outside themselves to distract them from the fact that they should be living <a href="http://chuckb.me/x2">conatively</a> (with Committed Movement in a Purposeful Direction), not cognitively.</p>
<p>The keys to success are inside of us, not out there in the world.  Put on your big boy pants, face the music, and figure out what you need to do to get where you want to go.  Then stop blaming the world around you for not providing you the secret sauce, and get after it.</p>
<p>Create your own success.  Gradually. Then suddenly.</p>]]>
      </description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 29 Oct 2011 21:59:00 -0600</pubDate>
      <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/tnwBlog/~3/AmVj0RB5gDA/its-never-the-process-its-always-the-person</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://chuckblakeman.com/2011/10/texts/its-never-the-process-its-always-the-person</guid>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://chuckblakeman.com/2011/10/texts/its-never-the-process-its-always-the-person</feedburner:origLink></item>
    <item>
      <title>What are you pretending not to know?</title>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>I have my stories.  I believe my stories.  I know exactly why my business isn&#8217;t working, or that it&#8217;s doing just fine, regardless of the facts to the contrary. What I know is usually my biggest problem.</p> <p>Most of us know too much. The problem with knowing how our business is going is what we know is almost always more of a problem than what we don&#8217;t know.  Why? Because &#8220;<span class="caps">WHAT</span> WE <span class="caps">KNOW</span>&#8221; is the most likely thing to keep us from finding out what we don&#8217;t.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s bigger than being close-minded, it&#8217;s more like being &#8220;finish-minded&#8221;.  &#8220;I&#8217;ve got this all figured out. There&#8217;s not much more I need to know.&#8221;</p>
<p>When I first started taking golf lessons I humbly figured I knew about 20% of what I needed to know to be a good golfer.  Two years later, after intensive ongoing lessons and dropping my handicap from a 12 to a 1.9, I figured I knew about 2-3 % of what I needed to know to be a good golfer.</p>
<p>When I started riding bikes seriously I thought I had figured that out when I was a kid. Thousands of miles later I&#8217;m still trying to figure out how to hit the apex of a corner correctly to keep my speed up.  And my stroke is atrociously lop-sided especially when I&#8217;m tired.  There&#8217;s a dozen other things I haven&#8217;t even begun to figure out.</p>
<p>That happens to me all time.  Just when I think I&#8217;ve got it down, I find out I&#8217;m flying blind again.</p>
<p>The problem is I&#8217;m not disoriented enough.  I&#8217;ve realized that <strong>adults don&#8217;t learn unless we&#8217;re disoriented</strong>.  I stop listening when I think I know, and only learn when I realize I don&#8217;t have it all figured out.</p>
<p>This jumps up and bites me most when something goes wrong in the business, and instead of being open to some new input I jump to a conclusion based on the existing story in my head.  And instead of working hard at finding a better solution, I default to old answers that keep me from moving forward.  And too often, I run the story in my head that I&#8217;m just a victim &#8211; the world around me is the problem.</p>
<p>But the worst result of believing my existing and stagnant stories is that it can keep me from asking one of the best questions I know -</p>
<p><strong>What am I pretending not to know?</strong></p>
<p>Deep down inside, we all know a few simple things about would make our business work, and we work hard to stuff them down deep. Because usually the thing that we know will make things work better has more to do with fixing me than fixing my business.  I&#8217;d rather fix my business.</p>
<p>We can sleep walk through building a business as the same unchanged person who started it, and come out the other end on the treadmill.  A lot of people do.  Or we can regularly ask ourselves &#8220;What am I pretending not to know?&#8221;, talk to a business mentor or friend to confirm our suspicions, and then go change the simple (but hard) thing that we need to address to move forward.</p>
<p>There are a lot of &#8220;Three-inch binder/six CD&#8221; seminars out there that will fix your business.  But you might save a lot of money and be more effective if you just regularly ask yourself -</p>
<p><strong>What am I pretending not to know?</strong></p>
<p>It&#8217;s amazing what we intuitively already know.  Go with it.</p>]]>
      </description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 22 Oct 2011 16:12:00 -0600</pubDate>
      <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/tnwBlog/~3/TPgIoqX4W2g/what-are-you-pretending-not-to-know</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://chuckblakeman.com/2011/10/texts/what-are-you-pretending-not-to-know</guid>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://chuckblakeman.com/2011/10/texts/what-are-you-pretending-not-to-know</feedburner:origLink></item>
    <item>
      <title>Peacekeepers lose everything at once.</title>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t be a peacekeeper. It won&#8217;t do anything for you or for those with whom you are keeping the peace. Successful people are not peacekeepers.</p> <p>It seems like a good sentiment &#8211; &#8220;Can&#8217;t we all just get along?&#8221; Peacekeepers invest a lot of energy into just that, keeping the peace.  The idea is that if you can keep the lid on, there is going to be fewer problems, less dissension and more time spent on being productive.</p>
<p>Nothing could be farther from the truth.</p>
<p>Peacekeepers fool themselves into thinking that if there is no present external evidence of a problem, there is no problem.  Or if there IS a problem, just give it some time and space, and it will go away.  Time heals all wounds, etc.</p>
<p>We take this approach all the time by not dealing with high maintenance clients, uncooperative or non-responsive employees whom we&#8217;ve allowed to become indispensable, or business partners who are going a direction we don&#8217;t want to go.</p>
<p>To deal with these we employ one of two strategies:<br />
1) <strong>The Random Hope Strategy</strong> &#8211; I plan to deal with it, but I&#8217;m waiting for the right time. I&#8217;m hoping the right opportunity will arise that will bring it up for me. <br />
2) <strong>Time Heals All Wounds Strategy</strong> &#8211; I&#8217;m afraid that dealing with it now will create more problems, and things usually just work themselves out with addressing them.</p>
<p>Both of these strategies usually result in something much different than we hoped.</p>
<p><strong>Border Skirmishes vs. World War</strong><br />
The real problem with these strategies is that our unwillingness to have a border skirmish eventually turns into a world war.  That little thing we didn&#8217;t want to address piles up on top of a dozen other small things and eventually the whole thing spins out of control.  We could have managed it when it was small, but by time it&#8217;s world war the best we can do is try to ride it out and survive it.</p>
<p>We need to be peacemakers, not peacekeepers.  There is a very big difference.</p>
<p><strong>Peacekeepers vs. Peacemakers</strong><br />
<em>Peacekeepers</em> avoid small issues until they blow up into world wars. <em>Peacemakers</em> are willing to deal with little things as they arise and as a result, they avoid the long-term intransigent issues that cripple us and our businesses.</p>
<p><em>Peacekeepers</em> function <em>reactively</em> &#8211; waiting until an issue blows up on its own to deal with it; usually when it&#8217;s too late.  <em>Peacemakers</em> function <em>proactively</em> &#8211; confronting small issues without emotion and before they become world wars.</p>
<p><strong>All Successful People are Peacemakers</strong><br />
My Irish friend, John Heenan says, &#8220;A person&#8217;s success is directly tied to the number of difficult conversations they are willing to have.&#8221;</p>
<p>In Ernest Hemingways book, &#8220;The Sun Also Rises&#8221;, two characters have a very revealing conversation.</p>
<p>“How did you go bankrupt?” Bill asked.<br />
“Two ways,” Mike said. “Gradually and then suddenly.”</p>
<p>Peacekeepers lose control gradually, then suddenly.  Peacemakers do just the opposite, they create success gradually by attacking small problems when they arise, not &#8220;later&#8221;.  Later never comes.</p>
<p>A few years ago I invested the time and money to fly across the U.S. simply to end a business relationship. I could have simply faded away, or just talked to the person on the phone. But this difficult conversation was necessary for full closure and to leave no room for the issue to grow into something bigger. I fought the border skirmish to ensure there would be no world war.</p>
<p>Too often we see only the last stage of success in someone&#8217;s life, and we think they were &#8220;suddenly&#8221; lucky.  The fact is that their willingness to deal with things all along the road create the gradual accumulation of good decisions that pile up and become what appears to be sudden success.</p>
<p>We don&#8217;t fail suddenly or succeed suddenly. Both roads are worn very gradually by a commitment to either peacekeeping, which eventually leads to failure, or peacemaking, which eventually leads to success.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t wait until it all happens to you.  He who makes the rules wins.  Take control of your business and your future and become a peacemakers.</p>
<p>Life is too short to be little. Play big &#8211; be a peacemaker.</p>]]>
      </description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 08:33:00 -0600</pubDate>
      <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/tnwBlog/~3/1ECdW01dTic/peacekeepers-lose-everything-at-once</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://chuckblakeman.com/2011/10/texts/peacekeepers-lose-everything-at-once</guid>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://chuckblakeman.com/2011/10/texts/peacekeepers-lose-everything-at-once</feedburner:origLink></item>
    <item>
      <title>If you haven’t been arrested in Tanzania...</title>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>Building a business is a lot like my trip to Tanzania.  I was supposed to be there for seven hours just to meet a Congolese Chief.  Five days later I was still trying to get across the finish line and get home.</p> <p>The trip seemed to be over at least 20 times.</p>
<p>At the outset, my visa and passport didn&#8217;t come back to Denver from the visa processor in NY. The day before I left I set up two one-way flights to NY and DC to get it, and then canceled them as the passport ended up in DC. I got it 30 minutes before they closed the doors for my flight to Africa.  I raced through security and walked on as they closed the doors.</p>
<p>I needed to be in Tanzania to honor two chiefs, who were going to do business with us for years to come. Even though we had competent employees there, it would be an insult to not meet an owner for their first export shipment.  Two days both directions on an airplane for a few hours with them was well worth it.</p>
<p>The visa snafu was only a warm up. They were supposed to meet me at the airport in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.  When I got there Wednesday I learned they hadn&#8217;t been able to get across the border into Uganda from the Congo yet, but would arrive the next day, Thursday.  I lost my non-refundable ticket home and bought a one way for the next night.</p>
<p>I had no hotel, no contacts, no knowledge of Tanzania.  English is the written language but I was having trouble finding anyone who spoke anything but Swahili.  I got a cab, a hotel, dinner, and went to sleep.</p>
<p>The next three days were spent trying to figure out how to get the Chiefs from the DR Congo through Uganda to Tanzania.  It was excruciating, and at least twice I had to have the airline call the gate to release my seat with just 90 minutes or so before the flight, so I could get my money back and schedule one the next day. The third day I took a long walk. That was a mistake.</p>
<p>On that walk I took a picture of a street with nice trees and a tall wall down one side, and was quickly faced with three policeman in fancy uniforms who let me know it was the President&#8217;s house behind the wall, and I has just taken an illegal picture. As they confiscated my iPhone and were walking me back to the guardhouse I realized my passport was back at the hotel, a big no-no, and my one-day visa had expired three days ago, a bigger no-no.</p>
<p>I was in the country illegally.</p>
<p>I decided to employ the adage &#8220;He who makes the rules wins&#8221;. So I grabbed my iPhone back from the guard, showed him how I could delete pictures, made small talk with a few simple phrases I&#8217;d learned in Swahili, then made a bold move. After asking his name, &#8220;Jina lako ni nani?&#8221;, I told him mine and  said, &#8220;Nafurahi kukufahamu&#8221; (pleased to meet you). Then with my iPhone in my hand, I turned around and started to walk away.</p>
<p>He let me go and I didn&#8217;t turn around to ask why.  It could have cost me my iPhone, my computer (which I had in my bag) and a few thousand shillings in my wallet.  I slept real good that night.</p>
<p>On Saturday, four days after I was supposed to leave, only one of the Chiefs arrived with our employee.  The other one was still stuck in Kampala, Uganda.  I changed my flight again at the last minute to leave Sunday. By this time I had frozen up two credit cards with what looked like suspicious activity in Tanzania (the card companies didn&#8217;t know I was there).  The third and last card worked.</p>
<p>We spent the next 24 hours doing everything we could to get the Chief there.  He needed money via Western Union.  My third card was now locked up and so was my <span class="caps">ATM</span> debit card because I had hit the limit getting cash to buy them hotel rooms, dinner, etc. We had someone wire us money from the states, but when it came two hours before the Chief&#8217;s flight, they spelled Marian (our employee), as Marien, and Western Union wouldn&#8217;t give us the money.  After all this it looked like an &#8216;e&#8217; was going to wreck the whole five day ordeal. We headed back to the hotel wondering if it was all for nothing.</p>
<p>At the hotel, exhausted and out of options, I tried my <span class="caps">ATM</span> card one more time. It had come out of its 24 hour max, and the machine spit just enough money to buy the airline ticket.  We raced back to Western Union but learned on the way there that the Chief was 10 kilometers from the airport and needed $6 to get a cab to get there.  With only 45 minutes left before his flight, it wasn&#8217;t going to happen.</p>
<p>We went back to the hotel and Marian talked to the Chief.  He decided we had been honorable in trying to get the other Chief here, so he would sign the papers for both of them.  We signed, took pictures, and with 10 minutes before they closed the gate for my flight to the U.S., I walked on the plane.  Had I missed it, I wouldn&#8217;t have had enough money to even get a hotel.</p>
<p>I got back in Denver at 1pm on Monday, changed in a hotel bathroom and facilitated a workshop from 4pm-6pm.  That evening I took my first hot shower since the Monday before and had a great night&#8217;s sleep.</p>
<p><strong>The point?</strong> <br />
Honestly, this is how you grow a successful business. You have a clear goal in mind, you get moving, and then the world begins to interact with your plan.  And from that point on it&#8217;s nothing like your fancy business plan said it would be.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s like a stream running downhill, winding all over the place to get where it needs to go. Those that get tired of hitting and overcoming beaver dams will quit.  Those that are able to clearly keep the goal in mind will keep going, pay the price and push their business over the top to profitability.  Those seven days were like a compressed microcosm of what it was like to build the seven businesses I&#8217;ve started over the last 25 years.</p>
<p>Want to be successful? It won&#8217;t happen because you have a great idea, big financing or slick marketing. It will happen because you know exactly what the goal is, you never lose sight of it, and you become a bulldog, doing whatever you have to in order get across the finish line, even if it means making your own rules.</p>]]>
      </description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 09 Oct 2011 20:22:00 -0600</pubDate>
      <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/tnwBlog/~3/XbJMVmy5Nj4/if-you-havent-been-arrested-in-tanzania</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://chuckblakeman.com/2011/10/texts/if-you-havent-been-arrested-in-tanzania</guid>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://chuckblakeman.com/2011/10/texts/if-you-havent-been-arrested-in-tanzania</feedburner:origLink></item>
    <item>
      <title>Stop looking at your numbers</title>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>I tell biz owners &#8220;Numbers is the language of business&#8221;, but also that numbers rarely tell the truth.  Not because we did bad math, but because we look at pictures when we should be watching movies.  Want to know how you&#8217;re doing? Grab the popcorn.</p> <p>Even if we think they&#8217;re important (and frankly, there&#8217;s only a few critical ones that are), we don&#8217;t look at the numbers the way we should.</p>
<p><strong>Pictures vs. Movies</strong><br />
The most important use of numbers in business is to see trends, not to see numbers.  Stop looking at your numbers &#8211; that will rarely help you. Numbers are almost always misleading unless they are put in a bigger context.</p>
<p>What if you look at this month&#8217;s numbers and they tell you that you won&#8217;t be able to cover your expenses.  Is that bad? Not necessarily.  What if they say you&#8217;ll make a bucket load of profit this quarter?  That can be very misleading, too.  In fact, both numbers might turn out be lies.</p>
<p>How can that be? I thought numbers didn&#8217;t lie?  In the context of a trend, they don&#8217;t, but by themselves as a snapshot they can be very misleading.  We need to see the whole movie to know what they are really saying.</p>
<p><strong>Your Most Important Numbers Aren&#8217;t In Accounting</strong><br />
Amazon &#8220;lost&#8221; hundreds of millions of dollars for a few years straight, and if that was the only number they looked at, it would have appeared they were running off a cliff.  But they had the sense to couple those accounting numbers with some even more important numbers outside accounting.  In their case, the important number early on was market share, not profit.  Profit became more important later. They were sacrificing short-term profit for long-term market share, and thus long-term bigger profits.</p>
<p>For any early stages business your most important numbers are almost always outside of accounting, usually in sales.  Don&#8217;t ignore the accounting numbers, but our sales and marketing numbers are much more important.  And the right question isn&#8217;t &#8220;How many clients do I have?&#8221; (that&#8217;s a snapshot), but &#8220;How many do I need, by when?&#8221;, and then, &#8220;What&#8217;s the trend &#8211; am I gaining enough clients in the right amount of time?&#8221;  That&#8217;s a movie.</p>
<p>Retail stores love the last quarter of the year &#8211; they can look like they&#8217;re making money hand over fist.  But if you put that in the context of the rest of the year, it might show that the store is about to go out of business.</p>
<p>If September looks worse than August, should you panic?  No, you should look at last August, as well as what is going on in the market right now, plus what you&#8217;ve done to change your business if anything, and a number of other non-number factors.  All of that together can help you identify a trend.</p>
<p><strong>The best use of numbers is to see the longest trends possible</strong>, a quarter, a year, two years, even more. If you&#8217;ve got three years worth of numbers to look at, you&#8217;ve got a movie that will give you a really great idea of where you&#8217;re going and the real strength of the business.  August doesn&#8217;t matter nearly as much as how it looks next to last August, or your forecast for next August.</p>
<p>In about the 12th month of Crankset Group I wondered if this was going to work. Then I looked at the <span class="caps">TREND</span> over the first 12 months and saw plainly that it was going in the right direction &#8211; too slowly for my taste, but still trending the right way.  And if we just kept the same trend for another 12 months, we would be profitable.</p>
<p>We decided to keep going, the dam broke and three months later we were over the top.  The trend was so much more valuable than the numbers themselves in deciding what to do and keeping me encouraged.</p>
<p>Stop focusing on pictures of where you are, both in accounting and throughout your business, and start focusing more on where you&#8217;ve been and where you believe that trend is taking you.</p>
<p><span class="caps">FYI</span> &#8211; charts are like pictures, but graphs are like movies. I like graphs more than charts. And I like any number in a context that can show me a clear trend over many months.  Only then can I really know what the number means and how I my business is really doing.</p>
<p>Stop just looking at numbers, you&#8217;ll glaze over like I do.  Look at the trends instead.  Watch the movies of your business to see how you&#8217;re doing and you&#8217;ll have the confidence to keep going and to make more money in less time.</p>]]>
      </description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 24 Sep 2011 10:09:00 -0600</pubDate>
      <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/tnwBlog/~3/luPOSjQkF-8/stop-looking-at-your-numbers</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://chuckblakeman.com/2011/9/texts/stop-looking-at-your-numbers</guid>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://chuckblakeman.com/2011/9/texts/stop-looking-at-your-numbers</feedburner:origLink></item>
  </channel>
</rss>

