<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">
<channel>
	<title>TMA portal - Group: Research</title>
	<link>http://www.tma-portal.eu/forums/?group=1</link>
	<description><![CDATA[European research portal on traffic monitoring and analysis]]></description>
	<generator>Simple:Press Forum Version 4.2.2</generator>
	
<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/tma-portal-forum-research" /><feedburner:info uri="tma-portal-forum-research" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><item>
	<title>rschatz on CFP: QoE Technical Session at COST Meeting Sep 20-21 2010, Zagreb</title>
	<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/tma-portal-forum-research/~3/Ylrurh-sRuc/</link>
	<category>Technical discussion</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tma-portal.eu/forums/technical-discussion/cfp-qoe-technical-session-at-cost-meeting-sep-20-21-2010-zagreb/#p52</guid>
	<description>&lt;p&gt;Dear QoE-interested TMA members!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Once again, we are going for a &lt;strong&gt;dedicated QoE-related Technical Session&lt;/strong&gt; at the TMA COST action’s upcoming MC-Meeting in Zagreb (Sep 20-21). The session will be (again) a great opportunity for learning about each other’s current activities in the field of QoE (including STSMs) and for fostering joint activity.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;By now we envisage a series of short presentations plus discussion, following a format similar to what we had in Zurich. (However, this time we’ll take care of a more relaxed pace that allows for going more in-depth, leaving sufficient breathing space for the discussion part &lt;img src="/wp-content/forum-smileys/sf-wink.gif" alt="Wink" /&gt;). In order to facilitate planning and get a rough idea about the amount and nature of participation, I ask you to briefly &lt;strong&gt;send a mail to schatz(AT)ftw.at with the following infos:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1) Do you plan to &lt;strong&gt;attend&lt;/strong&gt; the session? (if not: somebody else from your institution?)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2) If yes, do you want to give a &lt;strong&gt;presentation&lt;/strong&gt; about your (group’s) QoE-related activities?   &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;3) If yes, what will be the &lt;strong&gt;nature/content&lt;/strong&gt; of your presentation?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;    &lt;span&gt;Ideas so far are: Institutional Overview [IO], Technical Presentation [TP], STSM, or a combination of them.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;4) What is your preferred &lt;strong&gt;scheduling &lt;/strong&gt;of the QoE session?&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;    Options: a) Mo Morning, b) Mo Afternoon, c) Tu Morning&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;5) Do you have any &lt;strong&gt;further questions, comments or suggestions&lt;/strong&gt;?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Since the holiday season is approaching at the speed of light with planning activities more and more urgent, I ask all people interested in attending/presenting for a quick&lt;strong&gt; reply/&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;strong&gt;mail to schatz(AT)ftw.at until Thu June 24&lt;sup&gt;th&lt;/sup&gt; &lt;/strong&gt;! (sorry for the short notice)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thank you for your input and see you in Zagreb, Raimund Schatz&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/tma-portal-forum-research/~4/Ylrurh-sRuc" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jun 2010 14:01:33 +0000</pubDate>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.tma-portal.eu/forums/technical-discussion/cfp-qoe-technical-session-at-cost-meeting-sep-20-21-2010-zagreb/#p52</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
	<title>nglthu on Special Interest Group on "Quality of Experience (QoE)"</title>
	<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/tma-portal-forum-research/~3/4_N8iXInHfo/</link>
	<category>Technical discussion</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tma-portal.eu/forums/technical-discussion/special-interest-group-on-quality-of-experience-qoe/#p19</guid>
	<description>&lt;p&gt;Happy to see a QoE forum in somewhere:)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/tma-portal-forum-research/~4/4_N8iXInHfo" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 03:31:24 +0000</pubDate>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.tma-portal.eu/forums/technical-discussion/special-interest-group-on-quality-of-experience-qoe/#p19</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
	<title>nglthu on [QoE] Opening Question targeted towards Testing Methodologies &amp; Metrics</title>
	<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/tma-portal-forum-research/~3/ccuBhnGw1P4/</link>
	<category>Technical discussion</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tma-portal.eu/forums/technical-discussion/qoe-opening-question-targeted-towards-testing-methodologies-metrics/#p18</guid>
	<description>&lt;p&gt;1. How fast a response is, I think&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/tma-portal-forum-research/~4/ccuBhnGw1P4" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 03:24:55 +0000</pubDate>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.tma-portal.eu/forums/technical-discussion/qoe-opening-question-targeted-towards-testing-methodologies-metrics/#p18</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
	<title>segger on [QoE] Opening Question targeted towards Testing Methodologies &amp; Metrics</title>
	<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/tma-portal-forum-research/~3/BoGalFjqB2k/</link>
	<category>Technical discussion</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tma-portal.eu/forums/technical-discussion/qoe-opening-question-targeted-towards-testing-methodologies-metrics/#p17</guid>
	<description>&lt;p&gt;Welcome everybody!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I would like to open the discussion on &lt;strong&gt;Testing Methodologies &amp;#38; Metrics &lt;/strong&gt;with the following question:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Imagine that we agree to share subjective testing data (e.g. user ratings and network traces from Web QoE user studies) for analysis and comparison. What would you consider the TOP 5 requirements that need to be fulfilled so that the data exchanged is useful to you?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Best regards, Sebastian&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/tma-portal-forum-research/~4/BoGalFjqB2k" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 17:20:28 +0000</pubDate>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.tma-portal.eu/forums/technical-discussion/qoe-opening-question-targeted-towards-testing-methodologies-metrics/#p17</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
	<title>rschatz on Special Interest Group on "Quality of Experience (QoE)"</title>
	<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/tma-portal-forum-research/~3/t3-9W8PC0ow/</link>
	<category>Technical discussion</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tma-portal.eu/forums/technical-discussion/special-interest-group-on-quality-of-experience-qoe/#p16</guid>
	<description>&lt;p&gt;This Special Interest Group (SIG) deals with topics such as QoE models, metrics, test methods and frameworks in the context of traffic monitoring and analysis (TMA). It aims to:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Identify research      opportunities that emerge from connecting the fields of TMA and QoE, &lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Adress common research      topics, and &lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Foster collaboration and      exchange of QoE-related know-how among SIG participants.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For more information please visit the related &lt;a class="liinternal" title="Topic: Quality of Experience (QoE)" href="/topics/quality-of-experience/" target="_blank" target="_blank"&gt;QoE topic page&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Furthermore, we are going to kick off some discussion of SIG-related technical and organisational topics and hope for your enthusiastic participation!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Yours,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Raimund, Sebastian and Alessandro&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/tma-portal-forum-research/~4/t3-9W8PC0ow" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 18:08:29 +0000</pubDate>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.tma-portal.eu/forums/technical-discussion/special-interest-group-on-quality-of-experience-qoe/#p16</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
	<title>akassler on 	  Special Interest Group on “Bandwidth Estimation”</title>
	<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/tma-portal-forum-research/~3/UilOcH2dY7w/</link>
	<category>Technical discussion</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tma-portal.eu/forums/technical-discussion/special-interest-group-on-bandwidth-estimation/#p14</guid>
	<description>&lt;div id="post13"&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Dear Researchers interested in Bandwidth estimation,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;according to our discussion in Barcelona, we should have a 1-2 hour Telco to set up collaborative actions. I have created a Doodle poll for this. Please use this &lt;a class="liexternal" href="http://www.doodle.com/5mky9i5biac9znft" target="_blank"&gt;link&lt;/a&gt; to provide information on your availability. Please also upload your slides to the portal.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Best, Andreas&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/tma-portal-forum-research/~4/UilOcH2dY7w" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 22:13:08 +0000</pubDate>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.tma-portal.eu/forums/technical-discussion/special-interest-group-on-bandwidth-estimation/#p14</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
	<title>akassler on Telco to define way forward</title>
	<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/tma-portal-forum-research/~3/UDJdGt3Ol5w/</link>
	<category>Technical discussion</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tma-portal.eu/forums/technical-discussion/telco-to-define-way-forward/#p13</guid>
	<description>&lt;p&gt;Dear Researchers interested in Bandwidth estimation,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;according to our discussion in Barcelona, we should have a 1-2 hour Telco to set up collaborative actions. I have created a Doodle poll for this. Please use this &lt;a href="http://www.doodle.com/5mky9i5biac9znft" target="_blank"&gt;link&lt;/a&gt; to provide information on your availability. Please also upload your slides to the portal.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Best, Andreas&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/tma-portal-forum-research/~4/UDJdGt3Ol5w" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 22:11:34 +0000</pubDate>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.tma-portal.eu/forums/technical-discussion/telco-to-define-way-forward/#p13</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
	<title>mcanini on Special Interest Group on "Traffic Classification: Reference Tools and Data"</title>
	<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/tma-portal-forum-research/~3/yClYKtW8ELs/</link>
	<category>Technical discussion</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tma-portal.eu/forums/technical-discussion/special-interest-group-on-traffic-classification-reference-tools-and-data/#p12</guid>
	<description>&lt;p&gt;Alberto,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;that is a great idea. At this point it should be clear to anyone that reference tools &amp;#38; data are a necessity for this research to progress.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;My GTVS tool was an attempt to fill one gap and TIE comes at hand too. However, additional work is definitely needed.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This week the folks at ipoque have open sourced part of their DPI engine. I think this establishes a base comparison point from now on. Check the tool out at &lt;a href="http://opendpi.org/" target="_blank"&gt;http://opendpi.org/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/tma-portal-forum-research/~4/yClYKtW8ELs" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 14:53:01 +0000</pubDate>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.tma-portal.eu/forums/technical-discussion/special-interest-group-on-traffic-classification-reference-tools-and-data/#p12</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
	<title>vcarela on Special Interest Group on "Traffic Classification: Reference Tools and Data"</title>
	<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/tma-portal-forum-research/~3/OP0RZi8IrjQ/</link>
	<category>Technical discussion</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tma-portal.eu/forums/technical-discussion/special-interest-group-on-traffic-classification-reference-tools-and-data/#p11</guid>
	<description>&lt;p style="margin-bottom: 0cm;"&gt;Dear Alberto and all,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style="margin-bottom: 0cm;"&gt;UPC is also very interested in joining such an interesting SIG. We are working on several topics related to this area and, in particular,  we are currently studying the impact of sampling on traffic classification and the application identification problem using NetFlow data. Therefore, we have some NetFlow labeled traces that could be used in the framework of this new SIG.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style="margin-bottom: 0cm;"&gt;Obviously, we will assist to the Barcelona meeting where all these topics could be discussed.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/tma-portal-forum-research/~4/OP0RZi8IrjQ" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 17:40:19 +0000</pubDate>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.tma-portal.eu/forums/technical-discussion/special-interest-group-on-traffic-classification-reference-tools-and-data/#p11</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
	<title>akassler on 	  Special Interest Group on “Bandwidth Estimation”</title>
	<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/tma-portal-forum-research/~3/LYnWZ07m8aM/</link>
	<category>Technical discussion</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tma-portal.eu/forums/technical-discussion/special-interest-group-on-bandwidth-estimation/#p10</guid>
	<description>&lt;p&gt;This special interest group inside COST-TMA discusses issues related to Tools, Alghorithms and Mechanisms for Bandwidth Estimation, both using Active measurements, passive monitoring or mathematical models.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/tma-portal-forum-research/~4/LYnWZ07m8aM" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 08:49:57 +0000</pubDate>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.tma-portal.eu/forums/technical-discussion/special-interest-group-on-bandwidth-estimation/#p10</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
	<title>Alberto Dainotti on Special Interest Group on "Traffic Classification: Reference Tools and Data"</title>
	<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/tma-portal-forum-research/~3/O4JEpOiJeyE/</link>
	<category>Technical discussion</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tma-portal.eu/forums/technical-discussion/special-interest-group-on-traffic-classification-reference-tools-and-data/#p9</guid>
	<description>&lt;p&gt;This topic is to discuss about the birth of a special interest group inside COST-TMA related to Reference Tools and Data used for traffic classification, and to discuss the activities that can be carried out inside of it.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/tma-portal-forum-research/~4/O4JEpOiJeyE" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 19:12:15 +0000</pubDate>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.tma-portal.eu/forums/technical-discussion/special-interest-group-on-traffic-classification-reference-tools-and-data/#p9</feedburner:origLink></item>
</channel>
</rss>

