<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">

<channel>
	<title>ThoughtFarmer » Blog</title>
	
	<link>http://www.thoughtfarmer.com</link>
	<description>Social Intranet Software: ThoughtFarmer is Turnkey, Microsoft Certified</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 13:28:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/thoughtfarmer" /><feedburner:info uri="thoughtfarmer" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><feedburner:emailServiceId>thoughtfarmer</feedburner:emailServiceId><feedburner:feedburnerHostname>http://feedburner.google.com</feedburner:feedburnerHostname><item>
		<title>3 Potential Benefits of a Social Intranet</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/thoughtfarmer/~3/L39FhAyWNOA/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thoughtfarmer.com/blog/2010/03/09/3-potential-benefits-of-a-social-intranet/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 13:28:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Intranets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ROI]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thoughtfarmer.com/?p=1770</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[1) Realize the power of the network. 2) Create an environment where lucky foresight appears. 3) Unleash the power of individual minds.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h3>1. Realize the power of the network</h3>
<p>Metcalfe’s Law states that the value of a network is equal to the square of its number of users*.</p>
<p>Information shared on a social intranet <strong>increases in value as more people access it</strong>. Sharing information in this way invokes Metcalfe’s law, generating new value.</p>
<h3>2. Create an environment where lucky foresight appears</h3>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gary_Hamel">Gary Hamel</a>, visiting Professor of Strategic Management at London Business School, says that <strong>truly innovative strategies “are always, and I mean always, the result of lucky foresight.”</strong> The task of the entire organization then becomes communicating on as open and wide a channel as technology will permit, creating an environment where lucky foresight is more likely to make an appearance. A social intranet facilitates this wide communication channel.</p>
<h3>3. Unleash the power of individual minds</h3>
<p><a href="http://www.gurteen.com/gurteen/gurteen.nsf/id/bob-buckman">Bob Buckman</a>, former president of Buckman Laboratories, says:</p>
<blockquote><p><em>“If the greatest database in the company is housed in the individual minds of the associates of the organization, then that is where the power of the organization resides. These individual knowledge bases are continually changing and adapting to the real world in front of them. <strong>We have to connect these individual knowledge bases together</strong> so that they can do whatever they do best in the shortest possible time.”</em></p></blockquote>
<p>A social intranet becomes the Great Connector, hyperlinking these individual knowledge bases together.</p>
<p><em>*Our senior consultant Bryan Robertson reviews Metcalfe&#8217;s Law and other formulas for calculating ROI in his piece, &#8220;<a href="http://www.thoughtfarmer.com/blog/2009/04/27/intranet-roi/">The New Laws of Intranet ROI</a>.&#8221;</em></p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/thoughtfarmer/~4/L39FhAyWNOA" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thoughtfarmer.com/blog/2010/03/09/3-potential-benefits-of-a-social-intranet/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.thoughtfarmer.com/blog/2010/03/09/3-potential-benefits-of-a-social-intranet/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Use Custom Fields to Liven Up ThoughtFarmer Employee Profiles</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/thoughtfarmer/~3/3v4LAA32SQ8/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thoughtfarmer.com/blog/2010/03/04/use-custom-fields-to-liven-up-thoughtfarmer-employee-profiles/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 13:54:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Intranets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ThoughtFarmer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[help]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tip]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thoughtfarmer.com/?p=1765</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A how-to article on a useful ThoughtFarmer feature that enhances employee profiles.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Custom Profile Fields are a great way to make Employee Profiles more interesting.</p>
<p>By default, ThoughtFarmer includes room for contact information and general profile text. However, many people don&#8217;t know what to put for their bio unless there are specific fields to fill out. That&#8217;s where Custom Profile Fields come in.</p>
<p><strong>1. </strong>Go to the Administration Panel (you need administrator access) and click &#8220;User Profile Custom Fields&#8221;.</p>
<p><img src="http://www.thoughtfarmer.com/email/clients/instructional-screenshot-admin-panel.png" alt="[screenshot] Admin Panel: Custom Profile Fields" width="334" height="210" /></p>
<p><strong>2. </strong>Create a grouping for your new custom fields, such as &#8220;All About Me&#8221;.</p>
<p><img src="http://www.thoughtfarmer.com/email/clients/user-profile-2.png" alt="[screenshot] Custom Profile Field Grouping" width="411" height="148" /></p>
<p><strong>3.</strong> Add custom fields. Select from Rich Text, Textbox, Text and Dropdown field types, and specify the maximum length.</p>
<p><img src="http://www.thoughtfarmer.com/email/clients/all-about-me.png" alt="[screenshot] Adding custom profile fields" width="459" height="217" /></p>
<p><strong>4.</strong> You&#8217;re done! Now your users can fill out the new fields, and they new information will appear on their profiles.</p>
<p><img src="http://www.thoughtfarmer.com/email/clients/custom-profile-fields-on-profile.png" alt="[screenshot] Employee profile with custom fields completed" width="358" height="258" /></p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/thoughtfarmer/~4/3v4LAA32SQ8" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thoughtfarmer.com/blog/2010/03/04/use-custom-fields-to-liven-up-thoughtfarmer-employee-profiles/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.thoughtfarmer.com/blog/2010/03/04/use-custom-fields-to-liven-up-thoughtfarmer-employee-profiles/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>What to name your new intranet?</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/thoughtfarmer/~3/2vuy3wC_Ue0/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thoughtfarmer.com/blog/2010/02/25/what-to-name-your-new-intranet/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 16:04:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intranets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[branding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[names]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thoughtfarmer.com/?p=1752</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What should you name your new intranet? The names some of our customers choose have lots of personality: Spike. Scrum. Orange. Mondo.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I enjoyed Step Two&#8217;s blog post on &#8220;<a href="http://www.steptwo.com.au/papers/cmb_intranetnames/index.html">Three views of intranet names</a>&#8220;. The three companies discussed named their intranets &#8220;<strong>Max</strong>&#8220;, &#8220;<strong>EON</strong>&#8221; (acronym for &#8216;Entertaining Opportunity Network&#8217;) and <strong>Buzz</strong>.</p>
<p>It made me think about the names that various ThoughtFarmer customers have used for their intranets. Here are a few of the ones I find interesting:</p>
<table class="post-data" border="0" cellspacing="2" cellpadding="2" style="padding-top:15px;">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th>Intranet name</th>
<th>ThoughtFarmer Customer</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Spike</strong></td>
<td>Guardian News &amp; Media</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Orange</strong></td>
<td>Continuum</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>The Tube</strong></td>
<td>IDEO</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>our.outreach</strong></td>
<td>Penn State University Outreach</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>The Amp</strong></td>
<td>Sudler &amp; Hennessey</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Scrum</strong></td>
<td>Myriad Mobile</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Mondo</strong></td>
<td>Mountain Equipment Co-op</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>Many of our customers simply name their intranet &#8220;Intranet&#8221;, as in &#8220;<strong>Acme Intranet</strong>&#8220;. Others do a take-off on the company name, such as &#8220;<strong>myAcme</strong>&#8220;.</p>
<p>Personally, I find names like Spike and Orange and Scrum have a bit more personality.</p>
<p>Some other ideas for naming your intranet can be found in these posts:</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://intranet-matters.de/intranet-names/">Collection of Intranet Names</a></li>
<li>Humorous: <a href="http://www.webdogs.org/2009/03/09/what-you-get-if-staff-could-name-your-intranet/">What you get if staff name your intranet</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.steptwo.com.au/papers/cmb_namingintranet/index.html">Why and how to name your intranet</a></li>
</ul>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/thoughtfarmer/~4/2vuy3wC_Ue0" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thoughtfarmer.com/blog/2010/02/25/what-to-name-your-new-intranet/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.thoughtfarmer.com/blog/2010/02/25/what-to-name-your-new-intranet/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Using Tags to Search in ThoughtFarmer</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/thoughtfarmer/~3/TvWlhxdA6wQ/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thoughtfarmer.com/blog/2010/02/23/tags-to-search-thoughtfarmer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 15:30:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>darren</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Intranets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ThoughtFarmer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thoughtfarmer.com/?p=1725</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tag clouds aren't all that helpful, especially on intranets. The real value of good tags is that they make content findable through search queries. Guest post by ThoughtFarmer customer Ephraim Freed from Oxfam America.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>This is a guest blog post by Ephraim Freed. Ephraim is Intranet Project Lead at <a href="http://www.oxfamamerica.org/">Oxfam America</a> and a ThoughtFarmer customer since 2008. </em></p>
<p><em><a href="http://www.thoughtfarmer.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/ephraim.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-1726" title="Ephraim Freed" src="http://www.thoughtfarmer.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/ephraim.jpg" alt="" width="212" height="256" /></a><br />
</em></p>
<p>Tag clouds aren&#8217;t all that helpful, especially on intranets. The real value of good tags is that they make content findable through search queries. <a title="Thomas Vander Wal" href="http://www.vanderwal.net/" target="_blank">Thomas Vander Wal</a> gave me a great suggestion about tagging. He said that when teaching people how to come up with useful tags, get them to ask themselves the question: &#8220;What terms would I or someone else use to search for this page (or file)?&#8221;</p>
<p>Why? Because tags are most useful when they help the right material get found. Search engines index the terms in titles and text of a page. Web search works so well these days because web sites now offer text that includes all the right key words. Professional web writers have figured it out, but it&#8217;s hard to get every employee to write like a pro.</p>
<p>This is where tags come in: they supplement the terms in the title and text of an intranet page with more keywords that help the page to show up in relevant searches.</p>
<h3>Good search = content keywords that match users&#8217; search terms</h3>
<p>Good search is not just the result of a magical search engine, but of good use of relevant words in content. Even with Google&#8217;s link-based algorithms, words are still the most important element of search. No search engine today, no matter how good, can make a page findable if it doesn&#8217;t include the terms that people would use to find it.</p>
<p>If you want good search you need good keywords in your content, and tags help to insert the right keywords without having to hire a web search optimization content writer.</p>
<p>The role of the intranet manager is shifting as intranets become more social, collaborative and interactive. While ensuring good, findable content is still an important part of managing an intranet, the nature of that work is changing. On a social intranet that allows employees to tag content freely, managing user-defined tags is important.</p>
<p>By fixing spelling errors in tags, adding relevant acronyms and creating multi-term tags, the intranet manager can increase content findability throughout the intranet. Ensuring that existing tags offer all the right key words means an intranet manager can have a broad effect on findability for content throughout the site.</p>
<h3>3 tips for making killer tags that improve findability</h3>
<p>I try to review our intranet’s entire tag list (almost 2,000 tags) once a month and I focus on these tag improvement tasks:</p>
<h4>1. Fix spelling errors</h4>
<p>Fixing misspelled tags can make many pages more findable with one fell swoop. If one user adds the tag &#8220;develpment&#8221; to a page, the next user who wants to add that word probably won&#8217;t notice when they start typing &#8220;devel&#8221; and the tag that comes up is just one letter off. But when someone tries to search using the term &#8220;development,&#8221; pages that have the miss-spelled word as a tag may not come up in search results.</p>
<h4>2. Add multiple versions of a word to a tag</h4>
<p>For a word with multiple versions, each of which could just as easily be used in a search query, the person adding tags to a page faces a dilemma: add all the different forms of the word, or just guess at the most popular one. This, however, doesn&#8217;t have to be an issue. The intranet manager can review tags and edit specific ones where multiple forms of word could easily be searched for. A perfect example: change the tag for &#8220;tag&#8221; to &#8220;tag, tags, tagging.&#8221; Now, all three forms of the word can be added to the page as keyword terms with just one tag.</p>
<h4>3. Create reverse duplicates of acronym tags</h4>
<p>I discovered that I could never know whether my users would add an acronym as a tag, or spell out a whole term. Would a user add &#8220;WTO&#8221; or &#8220;World Trade Organization?&#8221;</p>
<p>The solution: make sure there are two tags, each of which contains both terms. The first tag can have the acronym followed by the full term in parentheses, e.g. &#8220;WTO (World Trade Organization).&#8221; The second tag can have the term followed by the acronym, e.g. &#8220;World Trade Organization (WTO).&#8221; The end result will be that whether a user decides to add the acronym or the full term, she&#8217;ll end up adding both, and this will help make the page more findable.</p>
<h3>How ThoughtFarmer makes good tagging possible</h3>
<p>The ThoughtFarmer intranet software has a fabulous tagging system that enables all of the above tag improvement tasks.</p>
<p><strong>Multi-word tags</strong>: ThoughtFarmer allows individual tags to include multiple words with spaces. You don&#8217;t have to insert underscores or periods or worry about adding a dozen separate individual words.</p>
<p><strong>Capitalization in tags</strong>: Because ThoughtFarmer allows capital letters in tags, acronyms can be written properly and proper names are easy to add and recognize.</p>
<p><strong>Characters such as commas in tags</strong>: Because commas (and other characters, such as ampersands) can be included in individual tags, creating easy to read multi-term tags is easy and seamless.</p>
<p><strong>Type-search-ahead tag matching</strong>: When a user starts entering a tag she wants to add to the page, the tagging dialogue box will show a list of all matching tags in real time. This means that once one user adds a new tag, all other users will be able to re-apply that tag without needing to fully re-type it. This feature also helps with tag discovery &#8211; users will see additional tags in the matching field that they may not have originally thought of.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.thoughtfarmer.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/tag-fillout.png"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-1728" title="Tags Fillout" src="http://www.thoughtfarmer.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/tag-fillout.png" alt="" width="470" height="316" /></a></p>
<p><strong>Tag admin panel for editing user-added tags</strong>: And a final element is the tag administration panel in ThoughtFarmer. This panel lists every single tag added within the site and allows the site administrators to edit tags individually. Once a tag is edited, the new version appears everywhere that the tag was used. One fixed tag spelling can make a hundred pages more findable. Administrators can also delete mistake and duplicate tags.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.thoughtfarmer.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/tag-admin.png"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-1727" title="Tag Admin" src="http://www.thoughtfarmer.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/tag-admin.png" alt="" width="348" height="735" /></a></p>
<h3>Icing on the cake: Tags well integrated in ThoughtFarmer</h3>
<p>The icing on the folksonomy cake that is this blog post is that ThoughtFarmer does a great job of integrating tags into the site search. A ThoughtFarmer site can offer three distinct search buckets: All content, the People Directory, and the Group Page Directory:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.thoughtfarmer.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/search-filters.png"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-1729" title="Search Filters" src="http://www.thoughtfarmer.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/search-filters.png" alt="" width="545" height="456" /></a></p>
<p>And tag clouds and tag lists are seamlessly integrated into each of these search interfaces.</p>
<p>If you&#8217;re using ThoughtFarmer, I hope these tagging ideas help you get the most out of your social intranet site. And if you&#8217;re using any other software that includes tagging, I hope these tagging concepts help you increase the findability of all your important content.</p>
<input id="gwProxy" type="hidden" />
<input id="jsProxy" onclick="jsCall();" type="hidden" />
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/thoughtfarmer/~4/TvWlhxdA6wQ" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thoughtfarmer.com/blog/2010/02/23/tags-to-search-thoughtfarmer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.thoughtfarmer.com/blog/2010/02/23/tags-to-search-thoughtfarmer/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Twitter traffic better than Google traffic? Not for us</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/thoughtfarmer/~3/PoMlhZPAYsw/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thoughtfarmer.com/blog/2010/02/17/twitter-traffic-better-than-google-traffic-not-for-us/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 12:47:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ThoughtFarmer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thoughtfarmer.com/?p=1720</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was interested to read Ubervu's post last week about Traffic Quality - Twitter vs. Google. They shared metrics demonstrating that a web site referral from Twitter was much more valuable to them than a referral from Google. We've found quite the opposite. Twitter does drive a lot of traffic, but compare the quality of visit.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-1722" title="twitter-google" src="http://www.thoughtfarmer.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/twitter-google.png" alt="Twitter referrals vs Google" width="212" height="136" align="right" />I was interested to read <a href="http://www.ubervu.com/">Ubervu&#8217;s</a> post last week about <a href="http://blog.ubervu.com/post/383956842/measuring-social-media-value-traffic-quality-twitter">Traffic Quality &#8211; Twitter vs. Google</a>. They shared metrics demonstrating that a web site referral from Twitter was much more valuable to them than a referral from Google.</p>
<p><strong>We&#8217;ve found quite the opposite.</strong> Twitter <em>does</em> drive a lot of traffic. In the last 30 days, 7% of site traffic to <a href="http://www.thoughtfarmer.com">www.thoughtfarmer.com</a> came from Twitter, making it our #3 referrer after Google and direct visits. But compare the quality of visit:</p>
<h3>Bounce Rate</h3>
<p>Twitter Traffic: 67%<br />
Google Traffic: 49%<br />
Bing: 56%</p>
<div>
<p>Twitter visitors leave more quickly.</p>
<h3>Time On Site</h3>
</div>
<p>Twitter Traffic: 01:42<br />
Google Traffic: 03:17<br />
Bing: 00:03:45</p>
<div>
<p>Google visitors spend 90 seconds longer on our site than Twitter visitors. Bing visitors, even longer.</p>
<h3>Pages Per Visitor</h3>
</div>
<p>Twitter Traffic: 2.2<br />
Google Traffic: 4.1<br />
Bing: 5.2</p>
<div>
<p>A Google visitor views almost twice as many pages on our site as a Twitter visitor. Again, Bing visitors are even better.</p>
<h3>Conversion Rate For Goals</h3>
</div>
<p>Twitter Traffic: 0.49%<br />
Google Traffic: 2.17%<br />
Bing: 2.88%</p>
<p>This is the most important metric of all: what percentage of visitors complete a goal? Our goals include sending us an email or signing up for demo access. <strong>Notice that a Google visitor is 4 times more likely than a Twitter visitor to convert</strong>; a Bing visitor, almost 6 times more likely.</p>
<p>Clearly, for us here at ThoughtFarmer, traffic from Google is much higher quality than traffic from Twitter. Interestingly, Bing is even better than Google, though in terms of raw numbers, Bing delivers only 3% of the visitors that Google does.</p>
<p>Why were Ubervu&#8217;s results so different? Probably because they provide social media consulting, and people looking for social media consulting are more likely to be hanging out on Twitter.</p>
<p>Moral of the story: For most of us, Google search is still king. Don&#8217;t ignore Twitter, but beware the hype.<span style="color: #888888;"><br />
</span></p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/thoughtfarmer/~4/PoMlhZPAYsw" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thoughtfarmer.com/blog/2010/02/17/twitter-traffic-better-than-google-traffic-not-for-us/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.thoughtfarmer.com/blog/2010/02/17/twitter-traffic-better-than-google-traffic-not-for-us/</feedburner:origLink></item>
	</channel>
</rss>
