<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">

<channel>
	<title>The Listening Blog</title>
	
	<link>http://www.thelisteningblog.com</link>
	<description>“Listen all the time, and remind yourself when you’re not listening, or else the mike and the tape recorder will get the best of you.” – Pauline Oliveros</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 18:02:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/thelisteningblog" type="application/rss+xml" /><feedburner:emailServiceId>thelisteningblog</feedburner:emailServiceId><feedburner:feedburnerHostname>http://feedburner.google.com</feedburner:feedburnerHostname><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com" /><item>
		<title>“Farm Machine Music”</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/thelisteningblog/~3/DUVy89Su4NE/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thelisteningblog.com/2009/10/farm-machine-music/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 18:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ajharbison</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Extramusical sounds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Instrumental]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Popular music]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelisteningblog.com/?p=398</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I received this video in an email from my father-in-law this morning. This is what was in the forwarded message (not including his skeptical comment, &#8220;Is this for real?&#8221;):
Last seen and heard 2-3 years ago. Good to see and hear it again.
 This incredible machine was built as a collaborative effort between the
 Robert M. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I received this video in an email from my father-in-law this morning. This is what was in the forwarded message (not including his skeptical comment, &#8220;Is this for real?&#8221;):</p>
<blockquote><p>Last seen and heard 2-3 years ago. Good to see and hear it again.<br />
 This incredible machine was built as a collaborative effort between the<br />
 Robert M. Trammell Music Conservatory and the Sharon Wick School of<br />
 Engineering at the University of Iowa .. Amazingly, 97% of<br />
 the machines components came from John Deere Industries and Irrigation<br />
 Equipment of Bancroft , Iowa ..Yes, farm equipment!</p>
<p> It took the team a combined 13,029 hours of set-up, alignment,<br />
 calibration, and tuning before filming this video but as you can see it<br />
 was WELL worth the effort.</p>
<p> It is now on display in the Matthew Gerhard Alumni Hall at the University<br />
 and is already slated to be donated to the Smithsonian.</p></blockquote>
<p>Unfortunately, it&#8217;s pretty clear that this is fake. The whole look and feel of the video is very computer-animated-ish, and it would be very strange if the xylophonic-type instrument would actually light up as its bars were hit. But the most important tell-tale sign of fakery is the sound quality. There aren&#8217;t any microphones visible anywhere in the setup, and obviously if this was an acoustic instrument as the quote claims, there would have to be microphones to pick up the sound. And even if there were microphones that somehow weren&#8217;t visible in the video, the sound quality of the audio would not be nearly as neat and polished as it is&#8211;there would be a great deal of ambient noise, both from the space in general and from the bleeding of different parts of the &#8220;instrument&#8221; into each microphone.</p>
<p>And to confirm my suspicions, the trustworthy rumor-busting site <a href="http://www.snopes.com">Snopes.com</a> has exposed it as false in their article <a href="http://www.snopes.com/photos/arts/musicmachine.asp">&#8220;Farm Machine Music.&#8221;</a> It was created originally as a computer animation, but then was picked up by someone and passed off as a real video.</p>
<p>Nonetheless, it&#8217;s definitely an impressive animation and a fun song. Enjoy!</p>
<p><center><object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/ozSHXkCLM8U&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1&#038;"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/ozSHXkCLM8U&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1&#038;" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object></center></p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/thelisteningblog/~4/DUVy89Su4NE" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thelisteningblog.com/2009/10/farm-machine-music/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.thelisteningblog.com/2009/10/farm-machine-music/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Piano Stairs and The Fun Theory</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/thelisteningblog/~3/qYd7WBJcZnQ/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thelisteningblog.com/2009/10/piano-stairs-and-the-fun-theory/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 19:36:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ajharbison</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Instrumental]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Live music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelisteningblog.com/?p=394</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I saw this fun video in an email sent by a fellow member of the Christian Fellowship of Art Music Composers, and thought I&#8217;d pass it on. A group of creative folks try to get people to take the stairs rather than the escalator by turning the staircase into a big keyboard. Check it out!

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I saw this fun video in an email sent by a fellow member of the <a href="http://www.cfamc.org">Christian Fellowship of Art Music Composers</a>, and thought I&#8217;d pass it on. A group of creative folks try to get people to take the stairs rather than the escalator by turning the staircase into a big keyboard. Check it out!</p>
<p><center><object width="560" height="340"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/2lXh2n0aPyw&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1&#038;"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/2lXh2n0aPyw&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1&#038;" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="560" height="340"></embed></object></center></p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/thelisteningblog/~4/qYd7WBJcZnQ" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thelisteningblog.com/2009/10/piano-stairs-and-the-fun-theory/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.thelisteningblog.com/2009/10/piano-stairs-and-the-fun-theory/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>“Gustavo Dudamel: The Dude Abides”</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/thelisteningblog/~3/0INTRAFFo1w/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thelisteningblog.com/2009/10/gustavo-dudamel-the-dude-abides/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 18:20:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ajharbison</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Instrumental]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelisteningblog.com/?p=391</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I wrote back in March about Gustavo Dudamel, the young conductor with awesome hair who just took over the LA Philharmonic. And I read a good article on him today by Allen Yeh on Scriptorium Daily, the blog of Biola&#8217;s Torrey Honors Institute. The article is a fun read with good commentary, and he even [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I <a href="http://www.thelisteningblog.com/2009/03/gustavo-dudamel-and-the-teresa-carreno-youth-orchestra/">wrote back in March</a> about <a href="http://www.gustavodudamel.com">Gustavo Dudamel</a>, the young conductor with awesome hair who just took over the LA Philharmonic. And I read a good article on him today by Allen Yeh on <a href="http://www.scriptoriumdaily.com">Scriptorium Daily</a>, the blog of Biola&#8217;s Torrey Honors Institute. The article is a fun read with good commentary, and he even talks about his hair like I did. Check it out:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.scriptoriumdaily.com/2009/10/11/gustavo-dudamel-the-dude-abides/">&#8220;Gustavo Dudamel: The Dude Abides&#8221;</a></p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/thelisteningblog/~4/0INTRAFFo1w" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thelisteningblog.com/2009/10/gustavo-dudamel-the-dude-abides/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.thelisteningblog.com/2009/10/gustavo-dudamel-the-dude-abides/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>“Ways and Means,” Final Straw, Snow Patrol</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/thelisteningblog/~3/hL3eVHxmJK4/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thelisteningblog.com/2009/10/ways-and-means-final-straw-snow-patrol/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 23:45:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ajharbison</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Popular music]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelisteningblog.com/?p=388</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As I mentioned in my last post, I&#8217;ve been listening to Snow Patrol&#8217;s album Final Straw in my car recently, and one of the songs that has struck me as interesting is &#8220;Ways and Means,&#8221; which is track nine. The factor of interest is the chord progression in the verses. I&#8217;m not sure what key [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.thelisteningblog.com/2009/10/final-straw-snow-patrol/">As I mentioned in my last post</a>, I&#8217;ve been listening to <a href="http://www.snowpatrol.com">Snow Patrol</a>&#8217;s album <a type="amzn" asin="B0001MZ7ZK"><em>Final Straw</em></a> in my car recently, and one of the songs that has struck me as interesting is &#8220;Ways and Means,&#8221; which is track nine. The factor of interest is the chord progression in the verses. I&#8217;m not sure what key the song is in (I haven&#8217;t taken the time to check), but the progression is minor tonic and major tonic, alternating back and forth; or, in Roman numerals: i &#8211; I &#8211; i &#8211; I etc. Those are the only two chords throughout the whole verse, and although it&#8217;s a very unorthodox progression, it works very well (especially with the Mixolydian-ish melody line) and makes sense to the ear. <a href="http://www.thelisteningblog.com/2008/07/eyes-open-snow-patrol/">I&#8217;ve written before</a> about how Snow Patrol sometimes uses a single progression over and over in a song but can still make it interesting and not sound too repetitive; and &#8220;Ways and Means&#8221; is another good example.</p>
<p>You can listen to &#8220;Ways and Means&#8221; in its entirety <a href="http://listen.grooveshark.com/#/song/Ways_And_Means/111986">here</a>, courtesy of the latest free online music-playing site I&#8217;ve found, <a href="http://listen.grooveshark.com/">http://listen.grooveshark.com</a>.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/thelisteningblog/~4/hL3eVHxmJK4" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thelisteningblog.com/2009/10/ways-and-means-final-straw-snow-patrol/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.thelisteningblog.com/2009/10/ways-and-means-final-straw-snow-patrol/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Final Straw, Snow Patrol</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/thelisteningblog/~3/UeR9QwvVxXo/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thelisteningblog.com/2009/10/final-straw-snow-patrol/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 17:19:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ajharbison</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Popular music]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelisteningblog.com/?p=378</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of the most brilliant things Amazon has ever done is introduce their Free Super Saver Shipping program, which gives users free shipping on any order over $25. This has worked on me numerous times to get me to buy something I otherwise wouldn&#8217;t have, just to get free shipping (even though the price of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the most brilliant things <a href="http://www.amazon.com">Amazon</a> has ever done is introduce their Free Super Saver Shipping program, which gives users free shipping on any order over $25. This has worked on me numerous times to get me to buy something I otherwise wouldn&#8217;t have, just to get free shipping (even though the price of the item was probably greater than the cost of the shipping it removes). But recently, I ordered a few things from the site and to get the free shipping, also ordered <a type="amzn" asin="B0001MZ7ZK"><em>Final Straw</em></a>, the third album by UK band <a href="http://www.snowpatrol.com">Snow Patrol</a> and the one immediately preceding <a type="amzn" asin="B000F3UADO"><em>Eyes Open</em></a>, the only album of theirs that I have.</p>
<p><em>Eyes Open</em>, which <a href="http://www.thelisteningblog.com/2008/07/eyes-open-snow-patrol/">I&#8217;ve written about before</a>, is a very enjoyable CD and one that I&#8217;ve returned to in my own listening quite often. And Snow Patrol gets extra points because they opened for <a href="http://www.coldplay.com">Coldplay</a> earlier in their tour this year. So I was interested to see what <em>Final Straw</em> would be like.</p>
<p>I wasn&#8217;t disappointed, although I have to say it&#8217;s clearly not as good as <em>Eyes Open</em>. There are some really great tracks (I particularly like &#8220;Chocolate&#8221; and &#8220;Run,&#8221; tracks 6 and 7), and the sound is similar enough to <em>Eyes Open</em> to identify it as the same band. There&#8217;s a lot of minor electronic experimentation, mostly with little blips and bleeps that sound as if they&#8217;re somehow slightly outside the sphere of the band&#8217;s style. I also noticed that the singer&#8217;s voice is mixed differently on several different tracks; rather than finding one setting of reverb/delay/effects that makes his voice sound good, the band (or rather the producer) changed it multiple times&#8211;not only in obvious ways like adding distortion as in &#8220;Wow,&#8221; but different types of &#8220;normal&#8221; sounds to fit with different moods. And there are a plethora of short melodic ideas that are not quite hooks but serve to give the songs an identifying motif and fill empty harmonic space.</p>
<p>But it was interesting to listen to <em>Eyes Open</em> after I&#8217;d familiarized myself with <em>Final Straw</em>. It was clear that the band had learned lessons from the previous album and really crystallized their style. Mostly gone are the sometimes random electronic effects; the guitar playing is simpler, clearer and more direct. In a word, <em>Eyes Open</em> is a distillation of the best elements of <em>Final Straw</em> without the clutter and filler that the earlier album sometimes stumbled through. But I certainly enjoyed both records, and very much enjoyed seeing the band mature between the two.</p>
<p>Now I&#8217;m even more interested in getting the band&#8217;s latest release, <em>A Hundred Million Suns</em>, that came out last year and was the followup to <em>Eyes Open</em>. Anyone have that record and care to give me a sneak preview?</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/thelisteningblog/~4/UeR9QwvVxXo" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thelisteningblog.com/2009/10/final-straw-snow-patrol/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.thelisteningblog.com/2009/10/final-straw-snow-patrol/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Stockholm Syndrome Remixed</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/thelisteningblog/~3/aviBrRNJ-0M/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thelisteningblog.com/2009/09/stockholm-syndrome-remixed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 00:08:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ajharbison</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Popular music]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelisteningblog.com/?p=373</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As part of the highest tier of preorders available for Stockholm Syndrome, Derek Webb offered a disk of full album multi-track stems for remixing&#8211;in other words, the original recorded tracks for the album, so that they could be digitally altered and manipulated by others into remixes. A cool idea. The remixes all have a home [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As part of the highest tier of preorders available for <a href="http://www.thelisteningblog.com/2009/07/stockholm-syndrome-derek-webb"><em>Stockholm Syndrome</em></a>, <a href="http://www.derekwebb.com">Derek Webb</a> offered a disk of full album multi-track stems for remixing&#8211;in other words, the original recorded tracks for the album, so that they could be digitally altered and manipulated by others into remixes. A cool idea. The remixes all have a home at <a href="http://soundcloud.com/">SoundCloud</a>, and the <em>Stockholm Syndrome</em> group can be found here: </p>
<p><a href="http://soundcloud.com/groups/derek-webb-stockholm-syndrome">http://soundcloud.com/groups/derek-webb-stockholm-syndrome</a></p>
<p>Not all of them are particularly creative, but I really liked &#8220;Black Eye (Shiner Mix)&#8221; by user <a href="http://soundcloud.com/anothermisty">anothermisty</a>. It was an excellent example of taking the original material and doing something unique with it&#8211;something that was clearly derivative of the original but took it in a new creative direction. My favorite thing that anothermisty did was take Derek&#8217;s vocal track, duplicate it, and manipulate the pitch, thereby adding a harmony vocal line that didn&#8217;t exist in the original song. Very cool. &#8220;Cobra Con (Acoustic Remix)&#8221; is fun too, as it retains only the acoustic guitar tracks and the vocals from the original. &#8220;8-bit ConGame,&#8221; another remix of &#8220;Cobra Con,&#8221; imagines the song as music from a Nintendo game back in the day, with Webb&#8217;s vocals superimposed (quite quickly) over the chords of the chorus played in a loop. On its own it might not be terribly interesting, but if you know how the song goes, it&#8217;s cool to see how the different sections of the song interact.</p>
<p>Those are the highlights, but some of the others are interesting in their own ways. And you can keep checking back, since more will continue to be added as they&#8217;re created!</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/thelisteningblog/~4/aviBrRNJ-0M" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thelisteningblog.com/2009/09/stockholm-syndrome-remixed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.thelisteningblog.com/2009/09/stockholm-syndrome-remixed/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>“American Flag Umbrella,” Stockholm Syndrome, Derek Webb</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/thelisteningblog/~3/CTRbON7UAYE/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thelisteningblog.com/2009/09/american-flag-umbrella-stockholm-syndrome-derek-webb/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 19:18:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ajharbison</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Popular music]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelisteningblog.com/?p=370</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Another one of my favorite tracks on Derek Webb&#8217;s latest album Stockholm Syndrome is the last one, &#8220;American Flag Umbrella,&#8221; which is track 13 on the &#8220;censored&#8221; version of the record (without the song &#8220;What Matters More&#8221;) and track 14 on the full version. The lyrics speak to the racism still lurking in the undercurrents [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another one of my favorite tracks on <a href="http://www.derekwebb.com">Derek Webb</a>&#8217;s latest album <em>Stockholm Syndrome</em> is the last one, &#8220;American Flag Umbrella,&#8221; which is track 13 on the &#8220;censored&#8221; version of the record (without the song &#8220;What Matters More&#8221;) and track 14 on the full version. The lyrics speak to the racism still lurking in the undercurrents of American society and the tension between how things are and the way they should be, ending the album on a final note of hope. They&#8217;re some of the best on the album, in my opinion, belonging on the same category as &#8220;This Too Shall Be Made Right,&#8221; the amazing understated finish to his last album, <em>The Ringing Bell</em>, and one of my favorite of his songs overall. And the music is intriguing as well: also in the tradition of &#8220;This Too Shall Be Made Right,&#8221; which consisted simply of Derek&#8217;s voice and a solo acoustic guitar, the accompaniment to &#8220;American Flag Umbrella&#8221; is mainly an acoustic piano, with some percussion and synthesizers taking a back seat role, reversing the concept of most of the rest of the album. And, even more intriguing, the entire song is based on a single chord progression, which itself is based mainly on two chords: Gmaj7 &#8211; D/F# &#8211; Gmaj7 &#8211; D/F# &#8211; Gmaj7 &#8211; D/F# &#8211; A &#8211; Bm &#8211; Gmaj7 &#8211; D/F#. I think that the simple music makes the lyrics stand out even more and lends them a directness and power that more complicated music might have obscured; but I&#8217;ve also read reviews that believe that the music distracts and detracts from the lyrics. What do you think?</p>
<p>To listen to the song, <a href="http://www.relevantmagazine.com/culture/music/reviews/18088-derek-webb-stockholm-syndrome">click here</a>, click on the &#8220;Lala&#8221; player and scroll down to the last track. When I first clicked on it, it looked like it was going to play the whole song; but after I stopped it and went back later, it only played a 30-second clip. But it&#8217;s the only place online I could find that had at least the possibility of hearing the whole song. If you find another one, let me know; otherwise, try that link out and see if it works. And leave a comment to let me know what you think of the song and the music!</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/thelisteningblog/~4/CTRbON7UAYE" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thelisteningblog.com/2009/09/american-flag-umbrella-stockholm-syndrome-derek-webb/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.thelisteningblog.com/2009/09/american-flag-umbrella-stockholm-syndrome-derek-webb/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>“I Love/Hate You,” Stockholm Syndrome, Derek Webb</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/thelisteningblog/~3/ddXsTSE2070/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thelisteningblog.com/2009/09/i-lovehate-you-stockholm-syndrome-derek-webb/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2009 00:18:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ajharbison</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Popular music]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelisteningblog.com/?p=366</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Despite what I wrote a month ago, partly because I finally got the physical copy of the album, I&#8217;ve been listening quite a lot to Stockholm Syndrome, Derek Webb&#8217;s latest record. One of the tracks that has stood out to me is &#8220;I Love/Hate You,&#8221; one of his self-so-called &#8220;sabotaged love songs&#8221; (or at least [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Despite what <a href="http://www.thelisteningblog.com/2009/08/listening-on-the-ipod/">I wrote a month ago</a>, partly because I finally got the physical copy of the album, I&#8217;ve been listening quite a lot to <a href="http://www.thelisteningblog.com/2009/07/stockholm-syndrome-derek-webb/"><em>Stockholm Syndrome</em></a>, Derek Webb&#8217;s latest record. One of the tracks that has stood out to me is &#8220;I Love/Hate You,&#8221; one of his self-so-called &#8220;sabotaged love songs&#8221; (or at least I presume that it&#8217;s one of those songs). His philosophy is that although most love songs are &#8220;you&#8217;re great, I&#8217;m great, we&#8217;re great together, our love is great,&#8221; real life is not like that, being something more like &#8220;I&#8217;m broken, you&#8217;re broken, our love is messed up but we&#8217;re still committed to making it work&#8221; (he&#8217;s said &#8220;The truth will kill a good love song&#8221;). &#8220;I Love/Hate You&#8221; is the latest installment in the series, and follows a similar pattern as the previous versions, talking about a love that is simultaneously messy and even dangerous (&#8221;Your love is a noose around my neck&#8221;) and yet also a necessary and integral part of who he is (&#8221;But I don&#8217;t know who I am unless you&#8217;re holding me&#8221;). And the music makes it one of my favorite tracks on the album. It opens with an Eastern-sounding flute line, which makes for an interesting blend and contrast with the synthesized beat that enters next. This is one of the songs that bothered me due to its exact repetition, as I <a href="http://www.thelisteningblog.com/2009/07/stockholm-syndrome-derek-webb/">wrote about</a> in my intial review; each of the three verses repeats its opening line three times, with no variation. But I believe it&#8217;s an intentional artistic decision on Webb&#8217;s part, and when paired with the hypnotic synths that fill out the harmony, it creates a trance-like effect that&#8217;s really cool. And I think the music of the chorus is some of the most accessible and Top 40-sounding on the album, along the lines of &#8220;Cobra Con&#8221; (and I when I say &#8220;Top 40&#8243; I mean it in a good way&#8211;it sounds more like pop music, and less like electronic, and thus may be appealing to a wider variety of listeners). It&#8217;s another fun and very listenable song on my latest favorite album. You can hear the song in its entirety by playing the YouTube video below.</p>
<p><center><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/hpqbt9boeoE&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1&#038;"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/hpqbt9boeoE&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1&#038;" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object></center></p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/thelisteningblog/~4/ddXsTSE2070" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thelisteningblog.com/2009/09/i-lovehate-you-stockholm-syndrome-derek-webb/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.thelisteningblog.com/2009/09/i-lovehate-you-stockholm-syndrome-derek-webb/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>“Four Chord Song”</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/thelisteningblog/~3/ejRQDFmo9bg/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thelisteningblog.com/2009/09/four-chord-song/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 16:22:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ajharbison</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Live music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Popular music]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelisteningblog.com/?p=352</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks to my friend Jessica (@jesserface) for this one: A video by Australian musical comedy trio Axis of Awesome where the keyboardist quips, &#8220;We&#8217;ve never had a hit because we&#8217;ve never written a four chord song.&#8221; They then proceed to show how every pop song ever written uses the same four chords: I &#8211; V [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks to my friend Jessica (@<a href="http://twitter.com/jesserface">jesserface</a>) for this one: A video by Australian musical comedy trio <a href="http://www.axisofawesome.net/">Axis of Awesome</a> where the keyboardist quips, &#8220;We&#8217;ve never had a hit because we&#8217;ve never written a four chord song.&#8221; They then proceed to show how every pop song ever written uses the same four chords: I &#8211; V &#8211; vi &#8211; IV (in the video A, E, F-sharp minor and D). The list of songs included below the video is from the YouTube page, so I take no responsibility for any grammatical or punctuational or capitalizational errors (and just to be sure, I encased it all in quotation marks).</p>
<p>Funny? Yes. True? Yes. Sad? You decide.</p>
<p><center><object width="560" height="340"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/QpB_40hYjXU&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1&#038;color1=0x3a3a3a&#038;color2=0x999999"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/QpB_40hYjXU&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1&#038;color1=0x3a3a3a&#038;color2=0x999999" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="560" height="340"></embed></object></center></p>
<p>&#8220;Songs Included are :<br />
You&#8217;re beautiful by James Blunt,<br />
Forever young by the Alphaville (covered by Youth Group),<br />
I&#8217;m yours by Jason Mraz,<br />
Amazing by Alex Lloyd,<br />
Wherever you go by the Calling,<br />
Can you feel the love tonight by Elton John,<br />
She will be loved by Maroon 5,<br />
Pictures of you by the Last Goodnight,<br />
Cigarettes will kill you by Ben Lee,<br />
With or without you by U2,<br />
Fall at your feet by Crowded House,<br />
Am I not pretty enough? by Kasey Chambers,<br />
Let it be by The Beatles,<br />
Under the bridge by RHCP,<br />
Horses by Darryl Braithwaite,<br />
Down under by Men at Work,<br />
Waltzing Matilda,<br />
Old Australia&#8217;s funniest Homevideos intro,<br />
Taylor by Jack Johnson,<br />
2 become 1 by the Spice Girls,<br />
Take on me by A-ha,<br />
When I come around by Green Day,<br />
Save tonight by Eagle Eye Cherry,<br />
Africa by Toto,<br />
If I Were A Boy by Beyonce,<br />
Self Esteem by the Offspring,<br />
Apologize by One Republic,<br />
U + Ur Hand by P!nk,<br />
Pokerface by Lady Gaga,<br />
Barbie Girl by Aqua,<br />
Kids by MGMT,<br />
Scar by Missy Higgins,<br />
Thats all it takes to be a star by Axis Of Awesome.&#8221;</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/thelisteningblog/~4/ejRQDFmo9bg" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thelisteningblog.com/2009/09/four-chord-song/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.thelisteningblog.com/2009/09/four-chord-song/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>“Happy Birthday”</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/thelisteningblog/~3/L6Sdsrt1LDw/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thelisteningblog.com/2009/09/happy-birthday/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 16:19:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ajharbison</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Live music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Popular music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vocal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelisteningblog.com/?p=349</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My wife and I attended a holiday/birthday party on Labor Day, and we sang &#8220;Happy Birthday&#8221; to the lady who was turning a year older partway through the festivities. (Instead of a birthday cake, Irish cupcakes were served, which are cupcakes made from Guinness with Baileys frosting. They were delicious.) Being a musician, I&#8217;m often [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My wife and I attended a holiday/birthday party on Labor Day, and we sang &#8220;Happy Birthday&#8221; to the lady who was turning a year older partway through the festivities. (Instead of a birthday cake, Irish cupcakes were served, which are cupcakes made from Guinness with Baileys frosting. They were delicious.) Being a musician, I&#8217;m often asked to lead the group in singing everyone&#8217;s favorite (or least favorite) birthday song, but in this case, someone else, who is not a musician, did the honors. It&#8217;s hard, especially for non-musicians, to start singing something a cappella, because you don&#8217;t know exactly where you&#8217;re starting pitch-wise so you don&#8217;t know whether the range of the song will eventually take you too high or too low to sing comfortably. And, of course, it always takes a while for a non-musical group that&#8217;s singing to agree on a pitch. There were probably 15-20 people at the party at that time. I decided to listen intentionally to the group&#8217;s singing to see how long it took for them to fall into something close to a unison agreement. Unsurprisingly, it took two whole phrases: &#8220;Happy birthday to you, happy birthday to&#8211;&#8221; and then by the second &#8220;you,&#8221; they were pretty close to singing the same notes.</p>
<p>It was an interesting experiment. Try it the next time you&#8217;re at a birthday celebration&#8211;and let me know what you hear!</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/thelisteningblog/~4/L6Sdsrt1LDw" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thelisteningblog.com/2009/09/happy-birthday/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.thelisteningblog.com/2009/09/happy-birthday/</feedburner:origLink></item>
	</channel>
</rss><!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.475 seconds. --><!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2009-11-11 05:00:34 -->
