<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
    <title>TechSECLaw.com</title>
    <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.techseclaw.com/atom.xml" />
    <link rel="hub" href="http://hubbub.api.typepad.com/" />
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.techseclaw.com/" />
    <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:weblog-1791122</id>
    <updated>2009-12-09T13:50:04-08:00</updated>
    <subtitle>The Securities Law Blog for the Technology Industry</subtitle>
    <generator uri="http://www.typepad.com/">TypePad</generator>
    <entry>
        <title>SEC Meeting December 16, 2009 to Consider Adopting Changes to Executive Compensation and Other Disclosure Rules</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.techseclaw.com/2009/12/sec-meeting-december-16-2009-to-consider-adopting-changes-to-executive-compensation-and-other-disclo.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.techseclaw.com/2009/12/sec-meeting-december-16-2009-to-consider-adopting-changes-to-executive-compensation-and-other-disclo.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a0105368c28ac970b0120a738dd26970b</id>
        <published>2009-12-09T13:50:04-08:00</published>
        <updated>2009-12-09T13:50:04-08:00</updated>
        <summary>On Wednesday, December 16, 2009, the SEC commissioners will meet to consider whether to adopt amendments to rules and forms to revise the disclosures that companies are required to make about compensation and other corporate governance matters. At this time,...</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Robert A. Freedman and Jeffrey R. Vetter</name>
        </author>
        
        



    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title>For Executive Compensation Comments, SEC Likely to Require Amended Filings Instead of Allowing Fixes in Future Filings</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.techseclaw.com/2009/11/for-executive-compensation-comments-sec-likely-to-require-amended-filings-instead-of-allowing-fixes-.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.techseclaw.com/2009/11/for-executive-compensation-comments-sec-likely-to-require-amended-filings-instead-of-allowing-fixes-.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a0105368c28ac970b012875da7f7b970c</id>
        <published>2009-11-25T11:57:14-08:00</published>
        <updated>2009-11-25T11:59:43-08:00</updated>
        <summary>In a speech by Shelley Parratt, Deputy Director, Division of Corporate Finance, Ms. Parratt indicated that after years of the SEC giving &quot;futures&quot; comments on executive compensation in SEC filings, the SEC is more likely now to require companies to...</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Robert A. Freedman and Jeffrey R. Vetter</name>
        </author>
        
        



    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Proposed Rules Could Affect Proxy Disclosure</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.techseclaw.com/2009/11/proposed-rules-could-affect-proxy-disclosure.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.techseclaw.com/2009/11/proposed-rules-could-affect-proxy-disclosure.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a0105368c28ac970b0120a6d26c12970b</id>
        <published>2009-11-24T16:14:23-08:00</published>
        <updated>2009-11-24T16:14:23-08:00</updated>
        <summary>The SEC has proposed rules that would change the way stock options are treated in determining who is a &quot;named executive officer.&quot; Under the current Item 402 of Regulation SK, the amount recognized in the issuer&#39;s financial statements for the...</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Robert A. Freedman and Jeffrey R. Vetter</name>
        </author>
        
        



    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Proxy Access Deferred</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.techseclaw.com/2009/11/proxy-access-deferred.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.techseclaw.com/2009/11/proxy-access-deferred.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a0105368c28ac970b0120a6d262d7970b</id>
        <published>2009-11-24T16:07:26-08:00</published>
        <updated>2009-11-24T16:07:26-08:00</updated>
        <summary>It appears that the proposed proxy access rules will not be considered until next year, so even if approved, they would not become effective for this year&#39;s proxy season</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Robert A. Freedman and Jeffrey R. Vetter</name>
        </author>
        
        



    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title>New Regulation FD Guidance</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.techseclaw.com/2009/08/new-red-fd-guidance.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.techseclaw.com/2009/08/new-red-fd-guidance.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a0105368c28ac970b0120a50293a3970b</id>
        <published>2009-08-18T16:52:05-07:00</published>
        <updated>2009-08-18T17:12:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>On August 14, the SEC released its updated compliance and disclosure interpretations, which we all call &quot;CDIs.&quot; These covered some discrete areas of the Securities Act and Exchange Act, with some interesting updates in the Regulation FD area. Questions 102.05...</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Robert A. Freedman and Jeffrey R. Vetter</name>
        </author>
        
        



    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Options Backdating Update</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.techseclaw.com/2009/08/options-backdating-update.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.techseclaw.com/2009/08/options-backdating-update.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a0105368c28ac970b0120a55970df970c</id>
        <published>2009-08-18T15:15:45-07:00</published>
        <updated>2009-08-18T15:15:45-07:00</updated>
        <summary>The 9th Circuit today reversed the conviction of former Chief Executive Officer of Brocade Communication Systems for prosecutorial misconduct for making a false assertion of a material fact to the jury. No word yet if the US Attorney will seek...</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Robert A. Freedman and Jeffrey R. Vetter</name>
        </author>
        
        



    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Nasdaq Further Extends Suspension of Bid Price and Market Value Continued Listing Requirements Through July 31, 2009</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.techseclaw.com/2009/07/nasdaq-further-extends-suspension-of-bid-price-and-market-value-continued-listing-requirements-throu.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.techseclaw.com/2009/07/nasdaq-further-extends-suspension-of-bid-price-and-market-value-continued-listing-requirements-throu.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a0105368c28ac970b0115724657b0970b</id>
        <published>2009-07-29T10:38:32-07:00</published>
        <updated>2009-07-29T10:38:32-07:00</updated>
        <summary>Recently, the Nasdaq Stock Market extended through July 31, 2009 its temporary suspension of the continued listing requirements related to bid price and market value of publicly held shares for listing on Nasdaq. The previous suspension was set to expire...</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Rob Freedman</name>
        </author>
        
        



    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Independent Consultants and Legal Advisors for Comp Committees?</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.techseclaw.com/2009/07/independent-consultants-and-legal-advisors-for-comp-committees.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.techseclaw.com/2009/07/independent-consultants-and-legal-advisors-for-comp-committees.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a0105368c28ac970b01157225abf1970b</id>
        <published>2009-07-22T16:17:13-07:00</published>
        <updated>2009-07-22T16:54:20-07:00</updated>
        <summary>Under the proposed Investor Protection Act of 2009, legislation sponsored by the Treasury Department, the SEC will be required to promulgate rules defining independence standards for compensation consultants and outside legal advisors. Companies would then be required to disclose whether...</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Robert A. Freedman and Jeffrey R. Vetter</name>
        </author>
        
        



    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title>SEC Seeks Clawback of CEO&#39;s Stock Sale Proceeds and Bonus</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.techseclaw.com/2009/07/sec-seeks-clawback-of-ceos-stock-sale-proceeds-and-bonus.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.techseclaw.com/2009/07/sec-seeks-clawback-of-ceos-stock-sale-proceeds-and-bonus.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a0105368c28ac970b0115712f8ab7970c</id>
        <published>2009-07-22T10:58:30-07:00</published>
        <updated>2009-07-22T10:58:30-07:00</updated>
        <summary>The SEC announced today that it was exercising its power under Section 304 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act to clawback over $4 million in stock sale proceeds and bonuses paid to the CEO of an auto parts manufacturer that had previously...</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Robert A. Freedman and Jeffrey R. Vetter</name>
        </author>
        
        



    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title>The End of Routine Matters as We Know It</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.techseclaw.com/2009/07/the-end-of-routine-matters-as-we-know-it.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.techseclaw.com/2009/07/the-end-of-routine-matters-as-we-know-it.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a0105368c28ac970b0115719be277970b</id>
        <published>2009-07-01T16:48:40-07:00</published>
        <updated>2009-07-01T16:48:40-07:00</updated>
        <summary>Today, the SEC approved changes to NYSE Rule 452 that adds elections of directors to the list of non-routine matters. As a result, even in uncontested Board elections, unless beneficial owners specifically instruct, that owner&#39;s shares cannot be voted for...</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Robert A. Freedman and Jeffrey R. Vetter</name>
        </author>
        
        



    </entry>
 
</feed>

<!-- ph=1 -->
