<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?><rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" version="2.0">

<channel>
	<title>TaxGuru.in - Daily Newsletter</title>
	<atom:link href="https://taxguru.in/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
	<link>https://taxguru.in/</link>
	<description>Daily updates for CA, CS, CMA, MBA, Tax and Account Professionals, Advocates on Amendments in Income Tax, MVAT, Company Law, Service Tax, GST, LLP, DGFT, SEBI, RBI, Excise Duty, Custom Duty,  DTC, Corporate Laws, ICAI, ICSI and ICWAI Regulation, FEMA , Government Policies etc.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 15:29:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<xhtml:meta content="noindex" name="robots" xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"/><item>
		<title>CENVAT Demand Set Aside Because Statements Recorded Under Section 14 Were Used Without Mandatory Section 9D Compliance: CESTAT Delhi</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/excise-duty/cenvat-demand-set-statements-recorded-section-14-mandatory-section-9d-compliance-cestat-delhi.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/excise-duty/cenvat-demand-set-statements-recorded-section-14-mandatory-section-9d-compliance-cestat-delhi.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 15:29:33 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Excise Duty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cestat judgments]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1040752</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>CESTAT Delhi held that statements recorded during investigation cannot be relied upon as evidence unless the mandatory procedure under Section 9D—examination before adjudicating authority and admissibility determination—is followed.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/excise-duty/cenvat-demand-set-statements-recorded-section-14-mandatory-section-9d-compliance-cestat-delhi.html">CENVAT Demand Set Aside Because Statements Recorded Under Section 14 Were Used Without Mandatory Section 9D Compliance: CESTAT Delhi</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/excise-duty/cenvat-demand-set-statements-recorded-section-14-mandatory-section-9d-compliance-cestat-delhi.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>State GST Officer Lacked Jurisdiction as IGST on Imports Can Be Assessed Only by Customs Authorities: AP HC</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/state-gst-officer-lacked-jurisdiction-igst-imports-assessed-customs-authorities-andhra-pradesh-hc.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/state-gst-officer-lacked-jurisdiction-igst-imports-assessed-customs-authorities-andhra-pradesh-hc.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 15:24:53 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Goods and Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goods And Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high court judgments]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1040615</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Avanti Feeds Limited Vs Deputy Commissioner of State Tax (Andhra Pradesh High Court) The writ petition before the Andhra Pradesh High Court concerned the jurisdiction to assess and recover Integrated Goods and Services Tax (IGST) on imported goods and the authority of State GST officers to initiate proceedings in relation to such imports. The petitioner, [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/state-gst-officer-lacked-jurisdiction-igst-imports-assessed-customs-authorities-andhra-pradesh-hc.html">State GST Officer Lacked Jurisdiction as IGST on Imports Can Be Assessed Only by Customs Authorities: AP HC</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/state-gst-officer-lacked-jurisdiction-igst-imports-assessed-customs-authorities-andhra-pradesh-hc.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pass-Through Costs Excluded From Transfer Pricing PLI as No Value Addition Was Performed: ITAT Mumbai</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/pass-through-costs-excluded-transfer-pricing-pli-addition-performed-itat-mumbai.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/pass-through-costs-excluded-transfer-pricing-pli-addition-performed-itat-mumbai.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 15:19:08 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 144C]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 234A]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 234B]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 270A]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transfer Pricing]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1040796</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>ITAT Mumbai held that payments made to third-party vendors on a cost-to-cost basis, without any value addition by the assessee, should be treated as pass-through costs and excluded from PLI computation.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/pass-through-costs-excluded-transfer-pricing-pli-addition-performed-itat-mumbai.html">Pass-Through Costs Excluded From Transfer Pricing PLI as No Value Addition Was Performed: ITAT Mumbai</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/pass-through-costs-excluded-transfer-pricing-pli-addition-performed-itat-mumbai.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Section 269ST Penalty Deleted as Seized Excel Sheets Did Not Prove Single Cash Transaction Above ₹2 Lakh</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/section-269st-penalty-deleted-seized-excel-sheets-prove-single-cash-transaction-%e2%82%b92-lakh.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/section-269st-penalty-deleted-seized-excel-sheets-prove-single-cash-transaction-%e2%82%b92-lakh.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 15:17:05 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 269ST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 271DA]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1040803</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Tribunal held that consolidated Excel entries showing aggregate cash sales were insufficient to establish receipt of ₹2 lakh or more in a single transaction, and penalty under Section 271DA could not be sustained.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/section-269st-penalty-deleted-seized-excel-sheets-prove-single-cash-transaction-%e2%82%b92-lakh.html">Section 269ST Penalty Deleted as Seized Excel Sheets Did Not Prove Single Cash Transaction Above ₹2 Lakh</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/section-269st-penalty-deleted-seized-excel-sheets-prove-single-cash-transaction-%e2%82%b92-lakh.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bogus Purchase Addition Deleted Because Material Movement, Site Records &amp; Banking Proof Established Genuineness: ITAT</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/bogus-purchase-addition-deleted-material-movement-site-records-banking-proof-established-genuineness-itat.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/bogus-purchase-addition-deleted-material-movement-site-records-banking-proof-established-genuineness-itat.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 14:48:51 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bogus purchases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1040837</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Tribunal deleted purchase disallowances after noting invoices, transport records, weighbridge slips, tax returns and bank payments supported actual procurement and use of materials in infrastructure projects.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/bogus-purchase-addition-deleted-material-movement-site-records-banking-proof-established-genuineness-itat.html">Bogus Purchase Addition Deleted Because Material Movement, Site Records &#038; Banking Proof Established Genuineness: ITAT</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/bogus-purchase-addition-deleted-material-movement-site-records-banking-proof-established-genuineness-itat.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Share Transfer in Family Arrangement Not Taxable: ITAT Deletes ₹489 Crore Addition</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/share-transfer-family-arrangement-taxable-itat-deletes-rs-489-crore-addition.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/share-transfer-family-arrangement-taxable-itat-deletes-rs-489-crore-addition.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 14:46:11 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Gain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 143(3)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 2(47)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 254]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 45]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 48]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 68]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1040622</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The issue was whether a share transfer without consideration constituted taxable capital gains. The Tribunal held that genuine family realignment is not taxable.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/share-transfer-family-arrangement-taxable-itat-deletes-rs-489-crore-addition.html">Share Transfer in Family Arrangement Not Taxable: ITAT Deletes ₹489 Crore Addition</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/share-transfer-family-arrangement-taxable-itat-deletes-rs-489-crore-addition.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Service Tax Can’t Be Levied Solely on Form 26AS Entries Without Proving Taxable Service: Gauhati HC</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/service-tax-cant-levied-solely-form-26as-entries-proving-taxable-service-gauhati-hc.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/service-tax-cant-levied-solely-form-26as-entries-proving-taxable-service-gauhati-hc.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 14:39:16 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Goods and Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Form 26AS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goods And Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high court judgments]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1040700</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>High Court held that receipts reflected in Form 26AS cannot automatically be treated as taxable services. Tax liability must first be established under the charging provisions of law after examining the nature of the receipts.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/service-tax-cant-levied-solely-form-26as-entries-proving-taxable-service-gauhati-hc.html">Service Tax Can’t Be Levied Solely on Form 26AS Entries Without Proving Taxable Service: Gauhati HC</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/service-tax-cant-levied-solely-form-26as-entries-proving-taxable-service-gauhati-hc.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Car Dealer Incentives Are Trade Discounts, Not Taxable Commission, on Principal-to-Principal Sales: CESTAT Kolkata</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/service-tax/car-dealer-incentives-trade-discounts-taxable-commission-principal-to-principal-sales-cestat-kolkata.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/service-tax/car-dealer-incentives-trade-discounts-taxable-commission-principal-to-principal-sales-cestat-kolkata.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 14:32:02 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Service Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cestat judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goods And Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1040787</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Tribunal held that the margin between purchase and sale of vehicles is trading profit, not commission. Service Tax demand on such margin was therefore unsustainable.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/service-tax/car-dealer-incentives-trade-discounts-taxable-commission-principal-to-principal-sales-cestat-kolkata.html">Car Dealer Incentives Are Trade Discounts, Not Taxable Commission, on Principal-to-Principal Sales: CESTAT Kolkata</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/service-tax/car-dealer-incentives-trade-discounts-taxable-commission-principal-to-principal-sales-cestat-kolkata.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>CVD Rate Irrelevant for Cenvat Credit; Eligibility Depends on Nature of Levy: CESTAT Chennai</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/excise-duty/cvd-rate-irrelevant-cenvat-credit-eligibility-depends-nature-levy-cestat-chennai.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/excise-duty/cvd-rate-irrelevant-cenvat-credit-eligibility-depends-nature-levy-cestat-chennai.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 14:30:25 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Excise Duty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cenvat credit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cestat judgments]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1040763</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Tribunal held that credit depends on the nature of duty and not the rate at which it is paid. The key takeaway is that concessional CVD does not bar CENVAT credit.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/excise-duty/cvd-rate-irrelevant-cenvat-credit-eligibility-depends-nature-levy-cestat-chennai.html">CVD Rate Irrelevant for Cenvat Credit; Eligibility Depends on Nature of Levy: CESTAT Chennai</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/excise-duty/cvd-rate-irrelevant-cenvat-credit-eligibility-depends-nature-levy-cestat-chennai.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Contractor Entitled to GST Reimbursement Under Contract Clause Despite Missing Schedule A: Tripura HC</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/contractor-entitled-gst-reimbursement-contract-clause-missing-schedule-a-tripura-hc.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/contractor-entitled-gst-reimbursement-contract-clause-missing-schedule-a-tripura-hc.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 14:28:37 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Goods and Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goods And Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high court judgments]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1040775</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Court held that taxes paid under GST must be reimbursed under contractual terms. The key takeaway is that proof of payment ensures entitlement to reimbursement.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/contractor-entitled-gst-reimbursement-contract-clause-missing-schedule-a-tripura-hc.html">Contractor Entitled to GST Reimbursement Under Contract Clause Despite Missing Schedule A: Tripura HC</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/contractor-entitled-gst-reimbursement-contract-clause-missing-schedule-a-tripura-hc.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>ITAT Rejects Appeal Where Declared Capital Gains Accepted Without Adjustment</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/itat-rejects-appeal-declared-capital-gains-accepted-adjustment.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/itat-rejects-appeal-declared-capital-gains-accepted-adjustment.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 14:27:18 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 143(2)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 143(3)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 144B]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 147]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 148]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 148A]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 151A]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1040797</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Tribunal held that since the Assessing Officer made no addition after verifying disclosures, the grievance lacked merit. Grounds were rightly treated as infructuous due to absence of tax impact.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/itat-rejects-appeal-declared-capital-gains-accepted-adjustment.html">ITAT Rejects Appeal Where Declared Capital Gains Accepted Without Adjustment</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/itat-rejects-appeal-declared-capital-gains-accepted-adjustment.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mandatory PAN Requirement Introduced for Post Office Transactions Under Income Tax Rules 2026</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/mandatory-pan-requirement-introduced-post-office-transactions-income-tax-rules-2026.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/mandatory-pan-requirement-introduced-post-office-transactions-income-tax-rules-2026.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[editor7]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 14:13:03 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Income Tax Notifications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Post office notifications]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1040705</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The consolidation into Form 121 introduces stricter documentation and reporting obligations. The decision emphasizes accountability and structured tax reporting mechanisms.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/mandatory-pan-requirement-introduced-post-office-transactions-income-tax-rules-2026.html">Mandatory PAN Requirement Introduced for Post Office Transactions Under Income Tax Rules 2026</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/mandatory-pan-requirement-introduced-post-office-transactions-income-tax-rules-2026.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>AMC for Tier II Accounts Aligned with Tier I but Waived for Low Corpus up to ₹21,000</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/amc-tier-ii-accounts-aligned-tier-i-waived-corpus-rs-21000.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/amc-tier-ii-accounts-aligned-tier-i-waived-corpus-rs-21000.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[editor4]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 14:11:36 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pension scheme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PFRDA]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1040838</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Accounts with no contributions for four consecutive quarters will be classified as dormant and charged reduced AMC. This lower fee continues until the account becomes active again.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/amc-tier-ii-accounts-aligned-tier-i-waived-corpus-rs-21000.html">AMC for Tier II Accounts Aligned with Tier I but Waived for Low Corpus up to ₹21,000</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/amc-tier-ii-accounts-aligned-tier-i-waived-corpus-rs-21000.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>As a Foreign Company, Do I Need to File Annual CIT in China?</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/foreign-company-file-annual-cit-china.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/foreign-company-file-annual-cit-china.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dr Anil Gupta]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 13:41:03 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government Policy]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1040824</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The issue is whether foreign businesses without offices in China must comply with tax laws. The key takeaway is that activities and income sources can trigger CIT obligations even without physical presence.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/foreign-company-file-annual-cit-china.html">As a Foreign Company, Do I Need to File Annual CIT in China?</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/foreign-company-file-annual-cit-china.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reopening Invalid as Notice Issued Beyond Six-Year Limitation Period: SC</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/reopening-invalid-notice-issued-six-year-limitation-period-sc.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/reopening-invalid-notice-issued-six-year-limitation-period-sc.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 13:24:11 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 148]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 148A]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme court judgements]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1040827</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The issue was whether reassessment notice issued after six years was valid. The Court upheld that such notices are time-barred and cannot be sustained under law.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/reopening-invalid-notice-issued-six-year-limitation-period-sc.html">Reopening Invalid as Notice Issued Beyond Six-Year Limitation Period: SC</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/reopening-invalid-notice-issued-six-year-limitation-period-sc.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Delhi HC Quashed Reopening Notice as Issued Beyond Six-Year Limitation</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/delhi-hc-quashed-reopening-notice-issued-six-year-limitation.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/delhi-hc-quashed-reopening-notice-issued-six-year-limitation.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA AJAY KUMAR AGRAWAL]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 13:22:55 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high court judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 147]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 148]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1040734</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Court examined whether reassessment notice issued beyond limitation was valid. It held that notices issued after expiry of the six-year limit under the old regime are barred and liable to be set aside.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/delhi-hc-quashed-reopening-notice-issued-six-year-limitation.html">Delhi HC Quashed Reopening Notice as Issued Beyond Six-Year Limitation</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/delhi-hc-quashed-reopening-notice-issued-six-year-limitation.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Enteral Nutrition Product Not Beverage Due to Lack of Refreshment or Hydration Use: CAAR Mumbai</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/custom-duty/enteral-nutrition-product-considered-beverage-due-lack-refreshment-hydration-caar-mumbai.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/custom-duty/enteral-nutrition-product-considered-beverage-due-lack-refreshment-hydration-caar-mumbai.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 13:20:03 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Custom Duty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AAR Rulings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advance Ruling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Custom Duty Notifications]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1040818</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The case examined whether a tube-fed nutritional liquid qualifies as a beverage. Authorities held that its clinical use and lack of consumption as a drink exclude it from beverage classification.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/custom-duty/enteral-nutrition-product-considered-beverage-due-lack-refreshment-hydration-caar-mumbai.html">Enteral Nutrition Product Not Beverage Due to Lack of Refreshment or Hydration Use: CAAR Mumbai</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/custom-duty/enteral-nutrition-product-considered-beverage-due-lack-refreshment-hydration-caar-mumbai.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>GST Enforcement Excesses: Misuse of Section 130 Against Genuine Taxpayers</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gst-enforcement-excesses-misuse-section-130-genuine-taxpayers.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gst-enforcement-excesses-misuse-section-130-genuine-taxpayers.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[S PRASAD]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 13:18:02 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Goods and Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goods And Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1040813</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The issue highlights illegal confiscation of goods under Section 130 without evidence of tax evasion. The key takeaway is that penal provisions cannot be invoked without proving intent to evade tax.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gst-enforcement-excesses-misuse-section-130-genuine-taxpayers.html">GST Enforcement Excesses: Misuse of Section 130 Against Genuine Taxpayers</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gst-enforcement-excesses-misuse-section-130-genuine-taxpayers.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Procedure of alteration of Memorandum of Association under Companies Act, 2013</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/company-law/procedure-alteration-memorandum-association-companies-act-2013.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/company-law/procedure-alteration-memorandum-association-companies-act-2013.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DR CS RONAK JHUTHAWAT]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 13:14:07 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Company Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Companies Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Companies Act 2013]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1040806</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The procedure outlines steps for altering the Memorandum of Association, including board approval, shareholder resolution, and regulatory filings. It emphasizes that changes become effective only after Registrar or government approval.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/company-law/procedure-alteration-memorandum-association-companies-act-2013.html">Procedure of alteration of Memorandum of Association under Companies Act, 2013</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/company-law/procedure-alteration-memorandum-association-companies-act-2013.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reopening Invalid Without Independent Material Showing Escapement: Gujarat HC</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/reopening-invalid-independent-material-showing-escapement-gujarat-hc.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/reopening-invalid-independent-material-showing-escapement-gujarat-hc.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA AJAY KUMAR AGRAWAL]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 12:51:54 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high court judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 147]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 148]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 148A]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1040795</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Court held that reassessment under Sections 147/148 cannot be initiated solely on third-party data without independent evidence of income escapement. It ruled that such reopening amounts to suspicion and lacks the required “reason to believe.”</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/reopening-invalid-independent-material-showing-escapement-gujarat-hc.html">Reopening Invalid Without Independent Material Showing Escapement: Gujarat HC</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/reopening-invalid-independent-material-showing-escapement-gujarat-hc.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Section 80GGC Deduction Denied as Donation Linked to Bogus Political Party Activities</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/section-80ggc-deduction-denied-donation-linked-bogus-political-party-activities.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/section-80ggc-deduction-denied-donation-linked-bogus-political-party-activities.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA AJAY KUMAR AGRAWAL]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 12:43:07 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 132]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 148]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 148A]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 80GGC]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1040786</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Tribunal upheld disallowance of deduction where donations were routed back to donors through layered transactions. The key takeaway is that non-genuine donations do not qualify for tax deduction.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/section-80ggc-deduction-denied-donation-linked-bogus-political-party-activities.html">Section 80GGC Deduction Denied as Donation Linked to Bogus Political Party Activities</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/section-80ggc-deduction-denied-donation-linked-bogus-political-party-activities.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Practice vs Job – A Real Career Dilemma for CA</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/chartered-accountant/practice-job-real-career-dilemma-ca.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/chartered-accountant/practice-job-real-career-dilemma-ca.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Himanshu Santhalia]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 12:11:49 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[CA, CS, CMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Career Advice]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1040800</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The discussion highlights the key dilemma faced after CA qualification—practice or job. It concludes that the right choice depends on risk appetite, financial needs, and long-term career goals.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/chartered-accountant/practice-job-real-career-dilemma-ca.html">Practice vs Job &#8211; A Real Career Dilemma for CA</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/chartered-accountant/practice-job-real-career-dilemma-ca.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Companies (Amendment) Bill, 2026: Advancing India’s Corporate Regulatory Framework</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/company-law/companies-amendment-bill-2026-advancing-indias-corporate-regulatory-framework.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/company-law/companies-amendment-bill-2026-advancing-indias-corporate-regulatory-framework.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hetasvi Atulkumar Mehta]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 12:10:58 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Company Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Companies Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Companies Act 2013]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1040792</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Bill decriminalises minor offences by converting them into civil penalties, reducing fear of prosecution for procedural lapses. This approach encourages compliance while maintaining deterrence through financial penalties.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/company-law/companies-amendment-bill-2026-advancing-indias-corporate-regulatory-framework.html">Companies (Amendment) Bill, 2026: Advancing India’s Corporate Regulatory Framework</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/company-law/companies-amendment-bill-2026-advancing-indias-corporate-regulatory-framework.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Human Rights Issues under Armed Forces (Special Powers) Act, 1958</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/human-rights-issues-armed-forces-special-powers-act-1958.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/human-rights-issues-armed-forces-special-powers-act-1958.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shifali]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 12:06:08 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government Policy]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1040764</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The law granting special powers to armed forces was upheld, but courts emphasized that such powers are not absolute. Safeguards like proportional use of force and timely handover of detainees were mandated.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/human-rights-issues-armed-forces-special-powers-act-1958.html">Human Rights Issues under Armed Forces (Special Powers) Act, 1958</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/human-rights-issues-armed-forces-special-powers-act-1958.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Philosophy of Income Tax Act 2025: Perspectives from Great Thinkers</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/philosophy-income-tax-act-2025-perspectives-great-thinkers.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/philosophy-income-tax-act-2025-perspectives-great-thinkers.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MOHIT SINGH]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 12:01:06 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[income tax act 1961]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Income Tax Act 2025]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1040761</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The new tax law addresses long-standing concerns over complexity by reducing provisions and simplifying language. It introduces structural clarity and digital tools to improve compliance while reducing taxpayer burden. </p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/philosophy-income-tax-act-2025-perspectives-great-thinkers.html">Philosophy of Income Tax Act 2025: Perspectives from Great Thinkers</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/philosophy-income-tax-act-2025-perspectives-great-thinkers.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cloud Service Payments Not Taxable as Royalty Due to No Transfer of IP Rights: SC</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/cloud-service-payments-taxable-royalty-due-transfer-ip-rights-sc.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/cloud-service-payments-taxable-royalty-due-transfer-ip-rights-sc.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 11:52:58 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DTAA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme court judgements]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1040748</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Supreme Court affirmed that payments for cloud computing services are not royalty where no intellectual property rights are transferred. It held that mere access to services does not amount to use of equipment or technology under tax law.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/cloud-service-payments-taxable-royalty-due-transfer-ip-rights-sc.html">Cloud Service Payments Not Taxable as Royalty Due to No Transfer of IP Rights: SC</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/cloud-service-payments-taxable-royalty-due-transfer-ip-rights-sc.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Date of DRP Upload, Not Visibility in AO Module, Determines Receipt: Telangana HC</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/date-drp-upload-visibility-ao-module-determines-receipt-telangana-hc.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/date-drp-upload-visibility-ao-module-determines-receipt-telangana-hc.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 11:50:54 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high court judgments]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1040756</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Court held that the issue of treating DRP upload as receipt was already settled by earlier rulings. It dismissed the Revenue’s appeals while making the decision subject to the Supreme Court’s final outcome.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/date-drp-upload-visibility-ao-module-determines-receipt-telangana-hc.html">Date of DRP Upload, Not Visibility in AO Module, Determines Receipt: Telangana HC</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/date-drp-upload-visibility-ao-module-determines-receipt-telangana-hc.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>TP Segment Split Rejected as Trading &amp; After-Sales Services Are Inextricably Linked; TNMM at Entity Level Upheld: ITAT Delhi</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/tp-segment-split-rejected-trading-tnmm-entity-level-upheld-itat-delhi.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/tp-segment-split-rejected-trading-tnmm-entity-level-upheld-itat-delhi.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 11:47:51 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 115JB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 143(2)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 143(3)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 144B]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 144C]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 270A]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transfer Pricing]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1040754</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Tribunal held that trading and service activities were inextricably linked and could not be segmented. It accepted entity-level TNMM, rendering TP adjustments unsustainable.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/tp-segment-split-rejected-trading-tnmm-entity-level-upheld-itat-delhi.html">TP Segment Split Rejected as Trading &#038; After-Sales Services Are Inextricably Linked; TNMM at Entity Level Upheld: ITAT Delhi</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/tp-segment-split-rejected-trading-tnmm-entity-level-upheld-itat-delhi.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>TDS Credit Can’t Be Denied Merely Because It Appears in Sister Concern’s 26AS: ITAT Delhi</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/tds-credit-cant-denied-appears-sister-concerns-26as-itat-delhi.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/tds-credit-cant-denied-appears-sister-concerns-26as-itat-delhi.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 11:45:01 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Form 26AS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 250]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TDS Credit]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1040758</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Tribunal held that TDS credit cannot be denied merely because it does not appear under the assessee’s PAN. It ruled that the assessee cannot be forced to ensure revision of TDS returns by the deductor.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/tds-credit-cant-denied-appears-sister-concerns-26as-itat-delhi.html">TDS Credit Can’t Be Denied Merely Because It Appears in Sister Concern’s 26AS: ITAT Delhi</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/tds-credit-cant-denied-appears-sister-concerns-26as-itat-delhi.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Only Legitimate Tax Can Be Collected; ITAT Restores BBC Distribution Fee Royalty Taxability Issue</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/legitimate-tax-collected-itat-restores-bbc-distribution-fee-royalty-taxability-issue.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/legitimate-tax-collected-itat-restores-bbc-distribution-fee-royalty-taxability-issue.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 11:43:01 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DTAA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 250]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1040767</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Tribunal set aside the dismissal of a delayed appeal, holding that the issue of distribution fee taxability requires fresh examination on merits. The case was remanded to the Assessing Officer for reconsideration with proper hearing.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/legitimate-tax-collected-itat-restores-bbc-distribution-fee-royalty-taxability-issue.html">Only Legitimate Tax Can Be Collected; ITAT Restores BBC Distribution Fee Royalty Taxability Issue</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/legitimate-tax-collected-itat-restores-bbc-distribution-fee-royalty-taxability-issue.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Refund of Earlier Advance Can’t Be Taxed as Accommodation Entry U/s 68: ITAT Delhi</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/refund-earlier-advance-cant-taxed-accommodation-entry-section-68-itat-delhi.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/refund-earlier-advance-cant-taxed-accommodation-entry-section-68-itat-delhi.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 11:40:53 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bogus purchases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 143(3)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 147]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 153C]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 68]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 69C]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1040782</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Tribunal held that return of advances cannot be taxed under Section 68. The key takeaway is that explained transactions supported by records cannot be treated as unexplained income.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/refund-earlier-advance-cant-taxed-accommodation-entry-section-68-itat-delhi.html">Refund of Earlier Advance Can’t Be Taxed as Accommodation Entry U/s 68: ITAT Delhi</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/refund-earlier-advance-cant-taxed-accommodation-entry-section-68-itat-delhi.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>No Penalty Where Return Filed After Probate Grant and Income Fully Disclosed in Form 26AS</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/penalty-return-filed-probate-grant-income-fully-disclosed-form-26as.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/penalty-return-filed-probate-grant-income-fully-disclosed-form-26as.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[editor4]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 11:36:36 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Form 26AS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Income Tax Penalty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 148]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 270A]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1040776</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Tribunal held that delay in filing the return due to pending probate proceedings was beyond the control of executors. It ruled that such delay constituted a bona fide explanation, leading to deletion of penalty under Section 270A.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/penalty-return-filed-probate-grant-income-fully-disclosed-form-26as.html">No Penalty Where Return Filed After Probate Grant and Income Fully Disclosed in Form 26AS</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/penalty-return-filed-probate-grant-income-fully-disclosed-form-26as.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Licence Revocation Set Aside Due to Lack of Evidence Linking Customs Broker to Fradulent Exports</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/custom-duty/licence-revocation-set-due-lack-evidence-linking-customs-broker-fradulent-exports.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/custom-duty/licence-revocation-set-due-lack-evidence-linking-customs-broker-fradulent-exports.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[editor8]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 11:34:33 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Custom Duty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cestat judgments]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1040777</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Tribunal held that no documentary evidence connected the Customs Broker to the alleged fraudulent exports. Revocation and penalty were quashed for want of proof.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/custom-duty/licence-revocation-set-due-lack-evidence-linking-customs-broker-fradulent-exports.html">Licence Revocation Set Aside Due to Lack of Evidence Linking Customs Broker to Fradulent Exports</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/custom-duty/licence-revocation-set-due-lack-evidence-linking-customs-broker-fradulent-exports.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>No TDS on Foreign Agent Commission for Services Rendered Abroad; ITAT Deletes Section 40(a)(i) Disallowance</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/tds-foreign-agent-commission-services-rendered-abroad-itat-deletes-section-40ai-disallowance.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/tds-foreign-agent-commission-services-rendered-abroad-itat-deletes-section-40ai-disallowance.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[editor4]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 11:31:39 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 143(3)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 144B]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 195]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 270A]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 40(a)(ia)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 43B]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1040789</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Tribunal held that commission paid to foreign agents for services rendered outside India is not taxable in India. Consequently, no TDS obligation arises, and disallowance under section 40(a)(i) was deleted.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/tds-foreign-agent-commission-services-rendered-abroad-itat-deletes-section-40ai-disallowance.html">No TDS on Foreign Agent Commission for Services Rendered Abroad; ITAT Deletes Section 40(a)(i) Disallowance</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/tds-foreign-agent-commission-services-rendered-abroad-itat-deletes-section-40ai-disallowance.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>No Section 43B Disallowance as Service Tax Not Claimed in P&amp;L: ITAT Dehradun</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/section-43b-disallowance-service-tax-claimed-pl-itat-dehradun.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/section-43b-disallowance-service-tax-claimed-pl-itat-dehradun.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[editor3]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 11:28:54 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 43B]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1040780</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The tribunal recalled its earlier order after finding it addressed an incorrect issue. It ultimately upheld that no disallowance applies when no expense is claimed.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/section-43b-disallowance-service-tax-claimed-pl-itat-dehradun.html">No Section 43B Disallowance as Service Tax Not Claimed in P&#038;L: ITAT Dehradun</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/section-43b-disallowance-service-tax-claimed-pl-itat-dehradun.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Insurance, Hedging &amp; Employee Training Services Qualify as Input Services for Cenvat Credit: CESTAT Delhi</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/excise-duty/insurance-hedging-employee-training-services-qualify-input-services-cenvat-credit-cestat-delhi.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/excise-duty/insurance-hedging-employee-training-services-qualify-input-services-cenvat-credit-cestat-delhi.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 11:24:56 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Excise Duty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cenvat credit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cestat judgments]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1040631</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The case addressed whether insurance services qualify as input services. The Tribunal held that insurance linked to business assets is eligible for Cenvat credit, emphasizing indirect nexus with manufacturing.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/excise-duty/insurance-hedging-employee-training-services-qualify-input-services-cenvat-credit-cestat-delhi.html">Insurance, Hedging &#038; Employee Training Services Qualify as Input Services for Cenvat Credit: CESTAT Delhi</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/excise-duty/insurance-hedging-employee-training-services-qualify-input-services-cenvat-credit-cestat-delhi.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Penalty Upheld on CHA for Lending Licence Without Due Diligence Leading to Smuggling</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/custom-duty/penalty-upheld-cha-lending-licence-due-diligence-leading-smuggling.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/custom-duty/penalty-upheld-cha-lending-licence-due-diligence-leading-smuggling.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 11:23:17 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Custom Duty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cestat judgments]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1040634</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The case examined whether a CHA can be penalized for allowing misuse of its licence. The Tribunal upheld the penalty, holding that lack of due diligence leading to smuggling attracts liability.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/custom-duty/penalty-upheld-cha-lending-licence-due-diligence-leading-smuggling.html">Penalty Upheld on CHA for Lending Licence Without Due Diligence Leading to Smuggling</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/custom-duty/penalty-upheld-cha-lending-licence-due-diligence-leading-smuggling.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>No GST Council Recommendation, No ‘Proper Officer’ Status; MP HC Quashes Order</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gst-council-recommendationaeproper-officeraestatusmp-hc-quashes-order.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gst-council-recommendationaeproper-officeraestatusmp-hc-quashes-order.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 11:21:38 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Goods and Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goods And Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high court judgments]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1040636</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The issue was whether an Assistant Commissioner was competent to pass a GST demand order. The Court held the order invalid due to lack of proper authorization. The key takeaway is that jurisdictional compliance is mandatory for tax orders.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gst-council-recommendationaeproper-officeraestatusmp-hc-quashes-order.html">No GST Council Recommendation, No ‘Proper Officer’ Status; MP HC Quashes Order</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gst-council-recommendationaeproper-officeraestatusmp-hc-quashes-order.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Commissioner Cannot Revoke G-Card Under CBLR; Penalty Reduced to ₹10,000: CESTAT Kolkata</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/custom-duty/commissioner-revoke-g-card-cblr-penalty-reduced-rs-10000-cestat-kolkata.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/custom-duty/commissioner-revoke-g-card-cblr-penalty-reduced-rs-10000-cestat-kolkata.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 11:17:51 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Custom Duty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cestat judgments]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1040738</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The case examined whether authorities could revoke a G-card under existing regulations. The Tribunal held that no such power exists and ordered restoration of the G-card.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/custom-duty/commissioner-revoke-g-card-cblr-penalty-reduced-rs-10000-cestat-kolkata.html">Commissioner Cannot Revoke G-Card Under CBLR; Penalty Reduced to ₹10,000: CESTAT Kolkata</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/custom-duty/commissioner-revoke-g-card-cblr-penalty-reduced-rs-10000-cestat-kolkata.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>GST Assessment Order Set Aside Due to Lack of Opportunity to Reply to SCN: Karnataka HC</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gst-assessment-order-set-due-lack-opportunity-reply-scn-karnataka-hc.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gst-assessment-order-set-due-lack-opportunity-reply-scn-karnataka-hc.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 11:16:24 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Goods and Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goods And Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high court judgments]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1040638</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The issue was whether failure to reply justified confirmation of demand. The Court held that proper adjudication required a response and remitted the matter with conditions.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gst-assessment-order-set-due-lack-opportunity-reply-scn-karnataka-hc.html">GST Assessment Order Set Aside Due to Lack of Opportunity to Reply to SCN: Karnataka HC</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gst-assessment-order-set-due-lack-opportunity-reply-scn-karnataka-hc.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>ITR Alone Can’t Prove Low Income to Escape Maintenance; Wife’s Earning Capacity No Bar: Gujarat HC</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/itr-cant-prove-income-escape-maintenance-wifes-earning-capacity-bar-gujarat-hc.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/itr-cant-prove-income-escape-maintenance-wifes-earning-capacity-bar-gujarat-hc.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 11:15:14 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high court judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Income Tax Returns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 397]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1040616</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The court upheld ₹50,000 monthly maintenance after finding insufficient evidence of reduced income. It ruled that inability claims must be substantiated and cannot defeat maintenance obligations.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/itr-cant-prove-income-escape-maintenance-wifes-earning-capacity-bar-gujarat-hc.html">ITR Alone Can’t Prove Low Income to Escape Maintenance; Wife’s Earning Capacity No Bar: Gujarat HC</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/itr-cant-prove-income-escape-maintenance-wifes-earning-capacity-bar-gujarat-hc.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>No Adhoc Disallowance of Commission on Assumptions Without Specific Defects: ITAT Delhi</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/adhoc-disallowance-commission-assumptions-specific-defects-itat-delhi.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/adhoc-disallowance-commission-assumptions-specific-defects-itat-delhi.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 11:12:04 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 143(3)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 234A]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 234B]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 37]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 40(a)(ia)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 40A(2)(b)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TDS]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1040629</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The issue was whether commission payments were genuine business expenses. The Tribunal held that disallowance based on non-response and suspicion was not justified. The key takeaway is that conjectures cannot replace evidence in tax assessments.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/adhoc-disallowance-commission-assumptions-specific-defects-itat-delhi.html">No Adhoc Disallowance of Commission on Assumptions Without Specific Defects: ITAT Delhi</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/adhoc-disallowance-commission-assumptions-specific-defects-itat-delhi.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Foreign Tax Credit Cannot Be Denied for Partial Overseas Return Filing: ITAT Mumbai</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/foreign-tax-credit-denied-partial-overseas-return-filing-itat-mumbai.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/foreign-tax-credit-denied-partial-overseas-return-filing-itat-mumbai.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 11:10:32 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Tax Credit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 143(2)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 144B]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 90]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1040736</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Tribunal held that FTC claims cannot be rejected solely due to incomplete foreign tax return filing. The key takeaway is that authorities must verify available and subsequent evidence before denying relief.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/foreign-tax-credit-denied-partial-overseas-return-filing-itat-mumbai.html">Foreign Tax Credit Cannot Be Denied for Partial Overseas Return Filing: ITAT Mumbai</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/foreign-tax-credit-denied-partial-overseas-return-filing-itat-mumbai.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>GST Appeal Rejected Due to Delay Beyond Statutory Limit: Allahabad HC</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gst-appeal-rejected-due-delay-statutory-limit-allahabad-hc.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gst-appeal-rejected-due-delay-statutory-limit-allahabad-hc.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 11:08:49 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Goods and Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goods And Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high court judgments]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1040741</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Court held that appeals filed beyond the maximum four-month period under GST law cannot be condoned. It ruled that limitation provisions must be strictly followed, leaving no scope for invoking the Limitation Act.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gst-appeal-rejected-due-delay-statutory-limit-allahabad-hc.html">GST Appeal Rejected Due to Delay Beyond Statutory Limit: Allahabad HC</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gst-appeal-rejected-due-delay-statutory-limit-allahabad-hc.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bombay HC Quashes 10-Year Delayed Cess Assessment as Unreasonable &amp; Time-Barred</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/bombay-hc-quashes-10-year-delayed-cess-assessment-unreasonable-time-barred.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/bombay-hc-quashes-10-year-delayed-cess-assessment-unreasonable-time-barred.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 11:05:33 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high court judgments]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1040745</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Court held that assessment proceedings delayed by over ten years are unreasonable and invalid. The key takeaway is that authorities must complete adjudication within a reasonable timeframe.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/bombay-hc-quashes-10-year-delayed-cess-assessment-unreasonable-time-barred.html">Bombay HC Quashes 10-Year Delayed Cess Assessment as Unreasonable &#038; Time-Barred</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/bombay-hc-quashes-10-year-delayed-cess-assessment-unreasonable-time-barred.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Search on Third Party Cannot Extend Reassessment Time Without Assessee Link: SC</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/search-party-extend-reassessment-time-assessee-link-sc.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/search-party-extend-reassessment-time-assessee-link-sc.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 11:01:09 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme court judgements]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1040598</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Supreme Court held that reassessment notices issued after the six-year limit are barred. It affirmed that expired cases cannot be revived under later provisions.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/search-party-extend-reassessment-time-assessee-link-sc.html">Search on Third Party Cannot Extend Reassessment Time Without Assessee Link: SC</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/search-party-extend-reassessment-time-assessee-link-sc.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Captive Power Valuation Must Include Electricity Duty for 80-IA Deduction: Calcutta HC</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/captive-power-valuation-include-electricity-duty-80-ia-deduction-calcutta-hc.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/captive-power-valuation-include-electricity-duty-80-ia-deduction-calcutta-hc.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 10:59:38 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high court judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[income tax act 1961]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 260A]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 80IA]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1040604</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The issue concerned overlap of deductions under Sections 80-IA and 80HHC. The Court held that 80HHC profits cannot be reduced by 80-IA deduction, ensuring independent computation.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/captive-power-valuation-include-electricity-duty-80-ia-deduction-calcutta-hc.html">Captive Power Valuation Must Include Electricity Duty for 80-IA Deduction: Calcutta HC</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/captive-power-valuation-include-electricity-duty-80-ia-deduction-calcutta-hc.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cash Deposits from Tractor Sales Can’t Be Taxed as Unexplained Income: ITAT Ahmedabad</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/cash-deposits-tractor-sales-cant-taxed-unexplained-income-itat-ahmedabad.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/cash-deposits-tractor-sales-cant-taxed-unexplained-income-itat-ahmedabad.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 10:55:42 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 115BBE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 144B]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 147]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 148]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 69A]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1040617</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The tribunal held that cash deposits backed by sales records cannot be treated as unexplained income. It upheld deletion of addition where transactions were properly documented.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/cash-deposits-tractor-sales-cant-taxed-unexplained-income-itat-ahmedabad.html">Cash Deposits from Tractor Sales Can’t Be Taxed as Unexplained Income: ITAT Ahmedabad</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/cash-deposits-tractor-sales-cant-taxed-unexplained-income-itat-ahmedabad.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bogus Purchase Addition Remanded as Fresh Evidence Warrants Verification: ITAT Surat</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/bogus-purchase-addition-remanded-fresh-evidence-warrants-verification-itat-surat.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/bogus-purchase-addition-remanded-fresh-evidence-warrants-verification-itat-surat.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 10:53:21 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bogus purchases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1040601</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The assessee produced new evidence including invoices and tax returns of suppliers. The Tribunal held that these documents must be examined before deciding the issue.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/bogus-purchase-addition-remanded-fresh-evidence-warrants-verification-itat-surat.html">Bogus Purchase Addition Remanded as Fresh Evidence Warrants Verification: ITAT Surat</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/bogus-purchase-addition-remanded-fresh-evidence-warrants-verification-itat-surat.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>No Capital Gains Tax on Void Sale Deed Executed Through Forged POA: ITAT Ahmedabad</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/capital-gains-tax-void-sale-deed-executed-forged-poa-itat-ahmedabad.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/capital-gains-tax-void-sale-deed-executed-forged-poa-itat-ahmedabad.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 10:51:58 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Gain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1040576</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The issue involved taxation of capital gains based on a disputed land sale. The Tribunal held that once the sale deed was declared void, no capital gains could arise.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/capital-gains-tax-void-sale-deed-executed-forged-poa-itat-ahmedabad.html">No Capital Gains Tax on Void Sale Deed Executed Through Forged POA: ITAT Ahmedabad</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/capital-gains-tax-void-sale-deed-executed-forged-poa-itat-ahmedabad.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Declared Value of Used Machinery Can’t Be Enhanced Solely on Local Chartered Engineer Certificate: CESTAT Chennai</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/custom-duty/declared-machinery-cant-enhanced-solely-local-chartered-engineer-certificate-cestat-chennai.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/custom-duty/declared-machinery-cant-enhanced-solely-local-chartered-engineer-certificate-cestat-chennai.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 10:49:37 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Custom Duty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cestat judgments]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1040547</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The issue involved enhancement of value of imported second-hand machinery. The Tribunal held that rejection of the load port certificate was unjustified, restoring the declared transaction value.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/custom-duty/declared-machinery-cant-enhanced-solely-local-chartered-engineer-certificate-cestat-chennai.html">Declared Value of Used Machinery Can’t Be Enhanced Solely on Local Chartered Engineer Certificate: CESTAT Chennai</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/custom-duty/declared-machinery-cant-enhanced-solely-local-chartered-engineer-certificate-cestat-chennai.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Commission Agent Not Eligible for TDS Credit on Farmers’ Income: ITAT Ahmedabad</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/commission-agent-eligible-tds-credit-farmersaeincome-itat-ahmedabad.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/commission-agent-eligible-tds-credit-farmersaeincome-itat-ahmedabad.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 10:43:28 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 194Q]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TDS Credit]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1040579</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The tribunal held that TDS credit cannot be claimed by an agent when the underlying income belongs to farmers. It ruled that credit must align with the person offering the income to tax.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/commission-agent-eligible-tds-credit-farmersaeincome-itat-ahmedabad.html">Commission Agent Not Eligible for TDS Credit on Farmers’ Income: ITAT Ahmedabad</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/commission-agent-eligible-tds-credit-farmersaeincome-itat-ahmedabad.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Writ Not Maintainable After GSTAT Becomes Functional Due to Availability of Appellate Remedy: Orissa HC</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/writ-maintainable-gstat-functional-due-availability-appellate-remedy-orissa-hc.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/writ-maintainable-gstat-functional-due-availability-appellate-remedy-orissa-hc.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 10:41:12 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Goods and Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goods And Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high court judgments]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1040428</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Court held that once GSTAT is operational and timelines are extended, disputes must be pursued through the appellate mechanism. Writ petitions cannot continue when an effective statutory remedy exists.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/writ-maintainable-gstat-functional-due-availability-appellate-remedy-orissa-hc.html">Writ Not Maintainable After GSTAT Becomes Functional Due to Availability of Appellate Remedy: Orissa HC</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/writ-maintainable-gstat-functional-due-availability-appellate-remedy-orissa-hc.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Excess GST Payment Must Be Adjusted Before Interest Recalculation: Madras HC</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/excess-gst-payment-adjusted-interest-recalculation-madras-hc.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/excess-gst-payment-adjusted-interest-recalculation-madras-hc.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 10:38:32 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Goods and Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goods And Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST Interest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high court judgments]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1040563</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Court held that penalty under Section 73 cannot be imposed without justification even where tax liability is admitted. It allowed reconsideration of the issue while confirming liability to pay interest on delayed payment. The ruling emphasizes that penalty is not automatic.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/excess-gst-payment-adjusted-interest-recalculation-madras-hc.html">Excess GST Payment Must Be Adjusted Before Interest Recalculation: Madras HC</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/excess-gst-payment-adjusted-interest-recalculation-madras-hc.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Karnataka HC Set Aside Ex-Parte ITC Rejection Due to COVID-Related Non-Response</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/karnataka-hc-set-ex-parte-itc-rejection-due-covid-related-non-response.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/karnataka-hc-set-ex-parte-itc-rejection-due-covid-related-non-response.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 10:35:46 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Goods and Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[COVID-19]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goods And Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high court judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[input tax credit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 73]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1040562</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Dispute on ITC mismatch between returns was remitted after ex-parte order, allowing reconciliation upon 10% pre-deposit. Key takeaway: reconciliation issues must be examined with proper hearing.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/karnataka-hc-set-ex-parte-itc-rejection-due-covid-related-non-response.html">Karnataka HC Set Aside Ex-Parte ITC Rejection Due to COVID-Related Non-Response</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/karnataka-hc-set-ex-parte-itc-rejection-due-covid-related-non-response.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>GST 70:30 Solar Tax Split Cannot Be Applied Retrospectively: AP HC</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gst-70-30-solar-tax-split-cannot-be-applied-retrospectively-ap-hc.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gst-70-30-solar-tax-split-cannot-be-applied-retrospectively-ap-hc.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 10:32:04 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Goods and Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goods And Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high court judgments]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1040574</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The court held that a GST circular cannot enforce retrospective application of the 70:30 tax split on solar EPC contracts. It clarified that such application is optional for taxpayers and not mandatory for authorities.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gst-70-30-solar-tax-split-cannot-be-applied-retrospectively-ap-hc.html">GST 70:30 Solar Tax Split Cannot Be Applied Retrospectively: AP HC</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gst-70-30-solar-tax-split-cannot-be-applied-retrospectively-ap-hc.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cheque Bounce Case: Bail Condition Modified as 80% Compensation Deposit Was Excessive</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/cheque-bounce-case-bail-condition-modified-80-percent-compensation-deposit-excessive.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/cheque-bounce-case-bail-condition-modified-80-percent-compensation-deposit-excessive.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 10:29:03 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high court judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Negotiable Instruments Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 148]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1040559</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The issue involved stringent deposit conditions imposed while granting bail in cheque dishonour cases. The High Court held such conditions excessive and reduced the requirement to 20% of the cheque amount.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/cheque-bounce-case-bail-condition-modified-80-percent-compensation-deposit-excessive.html">Cheque Bounce Case: Bail Condition Modified as 80% Compensation Deposit Was Excessive</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/cheque-bounce-case-bail-condition-modified-80-percent-compensation-deposit-excessive.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>SC Dismisses Revenue Appeal as Assessment Based on Guesswork Without Proof</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/sc-dismisses-revenue-appeal-assessment-based-guesswork-proof.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/sc-dismisses-revenue-appeal-assessment-based-guesswork-proof.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 10:24:35 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[income tax act 1961]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme court judgements]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1040595</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The issue was whether addition based on estimated yield was valid. The SC upheld that without material evidence, such additions are unsustainable and cannot be based on suspicion.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/sc-dismisses-revenue-appeal-assessment-based-guesswork-proof.html">SC Dismisses Revenue Appeal as Assessment Based on Guesswork Without Proof</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/sc-dismisses-revenue-appeal-assessment-based-guesswork-proof.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>No Addition if Assessment Based on Mere Guesswork &amp; Suspicion: Chhattisgarh HC</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/addition-assessment-based-mere-guesswork-suspicion-chhattisgarh-hc.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/addition-assessment-based-mere-guesswork-suspicion-chhattisgarh-hc.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 10:23:05 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high court judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[income tax act 1961]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 260A]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1040591</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The issue was whether addition based on assumed production yield is valid. The Court held that without supporting evidence, such additions are unsustainable and cannot justify rejection of books.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/addition-assessment-based-mere-guesswork-suspicion-chhattisgarh-hc.html">No Addition if Assessment Based on Mere Guesswork &#038; Suspicion: Chhattisgarh HC</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/addition-assessment-based-mere-guesswork-suspicion-chhattisgarh-hc.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Terror Financing Through Organized Crime Networks: A Critical Analysis</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/terror-financing-organized-crime-networks-critical-analysis.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/terror-financing-organized-crime-networks-critical-analysis.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Faisal Ali]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 10:11:39 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government Policy]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1040717</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The analysis highlights how terrorist groups rely on organized crime for funding and logistics. The key takeaway is that this nexus strengthens both entities and complicates enforcement efforts.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/terror-financing-organized-crime-networks-critical-analysis.html">Terror Financing Through Organized Crime Networks: A Critical Analysis</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/terror-financing-organized-crime-networks-critical-analysis.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>GST on Coaching Classes Upheld as Taxable Due to Non-Recognition as Educational Institution</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gst-coaching-classes-upheld-taxable-due-non-recognition-educational-institution.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gst-coaching-classes-upheld-taxable-due-non-recognition-educational-institution.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[editor8]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 09:54:57 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Goods and Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AAR Rulings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advance Ruling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goods And Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1040727</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The ruling held that supplementary coaching services are not exempt since the provider is not an “educational institution.” Such services are taxable at 18% as commercial coaching.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gst-coaching-classes-upheld-taxable-due-non-recognition-educational-institution.html">GST on Coaching Classes Upheld as Taxable Due to Non-Recognition as Educational Institution</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gst-coaching-classes-upheld-taxable-due-non-recognition-educational-institution.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Electric Bus Rentals Taxable at 18% Not 5%: GST AAR Gujarat</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/electric-bus-rentals-taxable-18-percent-5-percent-gst-aar-gujarat.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/electric-bus-rentals-taxable-18-percent-5-percent-gst-aar-gujarat.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 09:43:52 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Goods and Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AAR Rulings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advance Ruling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goods And Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1040729</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The authority held that electricity is not fuel denying concessional GST rates for electric bus rentals. The key takeaway is that such services fall under the residual entry and attract 18% GST</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/electric-bus-rentals-taxable-18-percent-5-percent-gst-aar-gujarat.html">Electric Bus Rentals Taxable at 18% Not 5%: GST AAR Gujarat</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/electric-bus-rentals-taxable-18-percent-5-percent-gst-aar-gujarat.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bank Attachment Ends After Final GST Order Under Section 74: SC</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/bank-attachment-ends-final-gst-order-section-74-sc.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/bank-attachment-ends-final-gst-order-section-74-sc.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 08:30:39 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Goods and Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goods And Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme court judgements]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1040726</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Supreme Court held that provisional attachment under GST law ceases once a final adjudication order is passed. The key takeaway is that such attachment cannot continue beyond the conclusion of proceedings.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/bank-attachment-ends-final-gst-order-section-74-sc.html">Bank Attachment Ends After Final GST Order Under Section 74: SC</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/bank-attachment-ends-final-gst-order-section-74-sc.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>No Reassessment on Mere Change of Opinion: SC Dismisses Revenue’s Plea in Marico Case</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/reassessment-mere-change-opinion-sc-dismisses-revenues-plea-marico-case.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/reassessment-mere-change-opinion-sc-dismisses-revenues-plea-marico-case.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 08:24:50 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme court judgements]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1040701</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Supreme Court in ACIT vs Marico Ltd held that reassessment under Section 148 is invalid where the Assessing Officer had already examined the issue in original assessment proceedings, reaffirming that reopening on a mere change of opinion is without jurisdiction.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/reassessment-mere-change-opinion-sc-dismisses-revenues-plea-marico-case.html">No Reassessment on Mere Change of Opinion: SC Dismisses Revenue’s Plea in Marico Case</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/reassessment-mere-change-opinion-sc-dismisses-revenues-plea-marico-case.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Builder Liable for Profiteering Due to Failure to Pass ITC Benefit Under GST</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/builder-liable-profiteering-due-failure-pass-itc-benefit-gst.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/builder-liable-profiteering-due-failure-pass-itc-benefit-gst.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 08:11:25 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Goods and Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anti-Profiteering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goods And Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GSTAT]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1040725</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The case examines whether additional ITC benefit post-GST was passed to buyers. The Tribunal held that failure to reduce prices amounted to profiteering, requiring refund with interest.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/builder-liable-profiteering-due-failure-pass-itc-benefit-gst.html">Builder Liable for Profiteering Due to Failure to Pass ITC Benefit Under GST</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/builder-liable-profiteering-due-failure-pass-itc-benefit-gst.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Duplicate DIN Attracts ₹50,000 Penalty Despite Unintentional Error</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/company-law/duplicate-din-attracts-rs-50000-penalty-unintentional-error.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/company-law/duplicate-din-attracts-rs-50000-penalty-unintentional-error.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[editor2]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 08:10:35 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Company Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Companies Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Companies Act 2013]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[company law notifications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Company Law Penalty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ministry of corporate affairs]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1040712</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>A director was penalized for holding two DINs in violation of statutory provisions. The key takeaway is that even inadvertent non-compliance attracts strict penalties under company law.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/company-law/duplicate-din-attracts-rs-50000-penalty-unintentional-error.html">Duplicate DIN Attracts ₹50,000 Penalty Despite Unintentional Error</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/company-law/duplicate-din-attracts-rs-50000-penalty-unintentional-error.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Delay in Board Meetings Beyond 120 Days Attracts Penalty Despite Disclosure</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/company-law/delay-board-meetings-120-days-attracts-penalty-disclosure.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/company-law/delay-board-meetings-120-days-attracts-penalty-disclosure.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[editor2]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 08:10:12 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Company Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Companies Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Companies Act 2013]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[company law notifications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Company Law Penalty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ministry of corporate affairs]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1040719</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The company failed to conduct the required number of board meetings and exceeded statutory time gaps. The key takeaway is that strict compliance with board meeting norms is mandatory.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/company-law/delay-board-meetings-120-days-attracts-penalty-disclosure.html">Delay in Board Meetings Beyond 120 Days Attracts Penalty Despite Disclosure</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/company-law/delay-board-meetings-120-days-attracts-penalty-disclosure.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Incorrect AOC-4 Filing Leads to Penalty Despite Rectification Request</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/company-law/incorrect-aoc-4-filing-leads-penalty-rectification-request.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/company-law/incorrect-aoc-4-filing-leads-penalty-rectification-request.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[editor2]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 08:09:56 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Company Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Companies Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Companies Act 2013]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[company law notifications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Company Law Penalty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ministry of corporate affairs]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1040723</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Filing incorrect details in statutory forms attracts penalties even if later corrected. The key takeaway is that rectification does not erase liability for the original default.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/company-law/incorrect-aoc-4-filing-leads-penalty-rectification-request.html">Incorrect AOC-4 Filing Leads to Penalty Despite Rectification Request</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/company-law/incorrect-aoc-4-filing-leads-penalty-rectification-request.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fractional Ownership Platforms (FOPs) and GST Products, Services, or Neither? A Critical Examination</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/fractional-ownership-platforms-fops-gst-products-services-neither-critical-examination.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/fractional-ownership-platforms-fops-gst-products-services-neither-critical-examination.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mohit Jain]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 08:03:44 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Goods and Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goods And Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1040706</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The framework clarifies GST on rental income and management fees but leaves gaps in other areas. The key takeaway is ongoing uncertainty around property transfers and ITC reversal.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/fractional-ownership-platforms-fops-gst-products-services-neither-critical-examination.html">Fractional Ownership Platforms (FOPs) and GST Products, Services, or Neither? A Critical Examination</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/fractional-ownership-platforms-fops-gst-products-services-neither-critical-examination.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Summary of Proposed Companies (Incorporation) Amendment Rules, 2026</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/company-law/summary-proposed-companies-incorporation-amendment-rules-2026.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/company-law/summary-proposed-companies-incorporation-amendment-rules-2026.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CS Renu Adhana]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 08:02:09 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Company Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Companies Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Companies Act 2013]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1040691</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The amendment merges 11 forms into two streamlined frameworks to reduce compliance burden. The key takeaway is faster, simpler company processes with fewer filings.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/company-law/summary-proposed-companies-incorporation-amendment-rules-2026.html">Summary of Proposed Companies (Incorporation) Amendment Rules, 2026</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/company-law/summary-proposed-companies-incorporation-amendment-rules-2026.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>FSSAI Proposes Plastic-Free Packaging Norms for Pan Masala</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/fssai-proposes-plastic-free-packaging-norms-pan-masala.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/fssai-proposes-plastic-free-packaging-norms-pan-masala.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[editor4]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 08:00:24 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FSSAI]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1040675</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The notification proposes a strict ban on plastic packaging for pan masala. It mandates eco-friendly alternatives and reinforces existing plastic waste rules to curb environmental and health risks.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/fssai-proposes-plastic-free-packaging-norms-pan-masala.html">FSSAI Proposes Plastic-Free Packaging Norms for Pan Masala</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/fssai-proposes-plastic-free-packaging-norms-pan-masala.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>No RCM Demand Where Service Provider Paid Tax Under Forward Charge: CESTAT Hyderabad</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/service-tax/rcm-demand-service-provider-paid-tax-charge-cestat-hyderabad.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/service-tax/rcm-demand-service-provider-paid-tax-charge-cestat-hyderabad.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[a2zbimaljain]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 07:57:46 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Service Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CA Bimal Jain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cestat judgments]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1040681</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Tribunal held that service tax cannot be demanded again under RCM if already paid by the service provider. However, the benefit applies only when full payment is conclusively proven.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/service-tax/rcm-demand-service-provider-paid-tax-charge-cestat-hyderabad.html">No RCM Demand Where Service Provider Paid Tax Under Forward Charge: CESTAT Hyderabad</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/service-tax/rcm-demand-service-provider-paid-tax-charge-cestat-hyderabad.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Section 16(2)(c) of CGST Act: Supplier default dilemma</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/section-16-2-c-cgst-act-supplier-default-dilemma.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/section-16-2-c-cgst-act-supplier-default-dilemma.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA KARTHIK SP]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 07:50:20 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Goods and Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goods And Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[input tax credit]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1040643</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Courts ruled that denying ITC due to supplier non-payment is unjust when buyers act in good faith. The key takeaway is that bona fide purchasers must be protected from impossible compliance burdens.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/section-16-2-c-cgst-act-supplier-default-dilemma.html">Section 16(2)(c) of CGST Act: Supplier default dilemma</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/section-16-2-c-cgst-act-supplier-default-dilemma.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>No ITC Denial Without Verifying Transaction Genuineness: HP HC</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/itc-denial-verifying-transaction-genuineness-himachal-pradesh-hc.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/itc-denial-verifying-transaction-genuineness-himachal-pradesh-hc.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[YASHPAL]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 07:45:09 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Goods and Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goods And Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high court judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[input tax credit]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1040646</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The High Court did not decide the constitutional challenge but directed authorities to reconsider the taxpayer’s objections and documents. The key takeaway is that ITC disputes must be adjudicated after proper evaluation and a reasoned order.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/itc-denial-verifying-transaction-genuineness-himachal-pradesh-hc.html">No ITC Denial Without Verifying Transaction Genuineness: HP HC</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/itc-denial-verifying-transaction-genuineness-himachal-pradesh-hc.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>How Organized Crime Undermines Economic and Internal Security</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/organized-crime-undermines-economic-internal-security.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/organized-crime-undermines-economic-internal-security.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shejal Yadav]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 07:30:47 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prevention of Money Laundering Act]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1040676</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Organized crime disrupts fair competition by introducing illegal goods and laundering illicit funds. The analysis highlights its damaging impact on financial systems and government revenues.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/organized-crime-undermines-economic-internal-security.html">How Organized Crime Undermines Economic and Internal Security</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/organized-crime-undermines-economic-internal-security.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Justice Deferred, Freedom Denied: A Critique of Preventive Detention Systems</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/justice-deferred-freedom-denied-critique-preventive-detention-systems.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/justice-deferred-freedom-denied-critique-preventive-detention-systems.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[editor2]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 07:27:35 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1040653</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Preventive detention laws allow incarceration without trial based on suspicion, raising serious concerns about violation of personal liberty. The analysis highlights how weak procedural safeguards enable misuse and arbitrary detention.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/justice-deferred-freedom-denied-critique-preventive-detention-systems.html">Justice Deferred, Freedom Denied: A Critique of Preventive Detention Systems</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/justice-deferred-freedom-denied-critique-preventive-detention-systems.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>TDS Non-Deduction Rules Tightened Due to Data Analytics Monitoring</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/tds-non-deduction-rules-tightened-due-data-analytics-monitoring.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/tds-non-deduction-rules-tightened-due-data-analytics-monitoring.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Amresh Vashisht]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 07:17:19 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[income tax act 1961]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Income Tax Act 2025]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TDS]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1040659</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The case highlights how the new framework enforces stricter compliance using data analytics. It underscores that incorrect declarations can trigger penalties and scrutiny</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/tds-non-deduction-rules-tightened-due-data-analytics-monitoring.html">TDS Non-Deduction Rules Tightened Due to Data Analytics Monitoring</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/tds-non-deduction-rules-tightened-due-data-analytics-monitoring.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>ICAI Convocation May – 2026 Dates and Locations</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/chartered-accountant/icai-convocation.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/chartered-accountant/icai-convocation.html#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[TG Team]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 06:20:40 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[CA, CS, CMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICAI]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/icai-convocation-ii-2010-1048.html</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>ICAI has released the May 2026 convocation schedule for members enrolled between Dec 2025 and Apr 2026. Eligible candidates will receive membership certificates and event details shortly.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/chartered-accountant/icai-convocation.html">ICAI Convocation May &#8211; 2026 Dates and Locations</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/chartered-accountant/icai-convocation.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>RBI (Commercial Banks Concentration Risk Management) Second Amendment Directions, 2026</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/rbi/rbi-commercial-banks-concentration-risk-management-second-amendment-directions-2026.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/rbi/rbi-commercial-banks-concentration-risk-management-second-amendment-directions-2026.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Editor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 04:25:35 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Fema / RBI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RBI Notifications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reserve bank of india]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1040484</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The issue was inconsistent methods for evaluating sovereign risk exposure. RBI mandated use of ECGC country risk classifications for uniform concentration risk management.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/rbi/rbi-commercial-banks-concentration-risk-management-second-amendment-directions-2026.html">RBI (Commercial Banks Concentration Risk Management) Second Amendment Directions, 2026</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/rbi/rbi-commercial-banks-concentration-risk-management-second-amendment-directions-2026.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>RBI (Commercial Banks Prudential Norms on Capital Adequacy) Third Amendment Directions, 2026</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/rbi/rbi-commercial-banks-prudential-norms-capital-adequacy-third-amendment-directions-2026.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/rbi/rbi-commercial-banks-prudential-norms-capital-adequacy-third-amendment-directions-2026.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[editor3]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 04:25:11 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Fema / RBI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RBI Notifications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reserve bank of india]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1040481</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>RBI amended capital adequacy norms to align with updated provisioning standards. The changes clarify inclusion and exclusion of provisions in Tier 2 capital.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/rbi/rbi-commercial-banks-prudential-norms-capital-adequacy-third-amendment-directions-2026.html">RBI (Commercial Banks Prudential Norms on Capital Adequacy) Third Amendment Directions, 2026</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/rbi/rbi-commercial-banks-prudential-norms-capital-adequacy-third-amendment-directions-2026.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>RBI (Commercial Banks Credit Facilities) Second Amendment Directions, 2026</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/rbi/rbi-commercial-banks-credit-facilities-second-amendment-directions-2026.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/rbi/rbi-commercial-banks-credit-facilities-second-amendment-directions-2026.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[editor3]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 04:24:27 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Fema / RBI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RBI Notifications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reserve bank of india]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1040463</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>RBI clarified that project finance accounts may be classified as NPAs even before operations begin. The decision promotes early detection of stress based on recovery performance.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/rbi/rbi-commercial-banks-credit-facilities-second-amendment-directions-2026.html">RBI (Commercial Banks Credit Facilities) Second Amendment Directions, 2026</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/rbi/rbi-commercial-banks-credit-facilities-second-amendment-directions-2026.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>RBI (Commercial Banks Credit Risk Management) – Second Amendment Directions, 2026</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/rbi/rbi-commercial-banks-credit-risk-management-second-amendment-directions-2026.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/rbi/rbi-commercial-banks-credit-risk-management-second-amendment-directions-2026.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[editor3]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 04:23:47 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Fema / RBI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RBI Notifications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reserve bank of india]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1040456</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Banks can temporarily rely on ECGC country classifications until internal systems are developed. The ruling ensures continuity while promoting gradual transition to advanced risk assessment models.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/rbi/rbi-commercial-banks-credit-risk-management-second-amendment-directions-2026.html">RBI (Commercial Banks Credit Risk Management) &#8211; Second Amendment Directions, 2026</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/rbi/rbi-commercial-banks-credit-risk-management-second-amendment-directions-2026.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>SEBI Extends Compliance Deadline for Debenture Trustees Due to Operational Challenges</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/sebi/sebi-extends-compliance-deadline-debenture-trustees-due-operational-challenges.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/sebi/sebi-extends-compliance-deadline-debenture-trustees-due-operational-challenges.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[editor4]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 04:21:17 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[SEBI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEBI notifications]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1040612</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The issue was compliance timeline under amended DT regulations. SEBI extended the deadline to October 2026 due to implementation challenges, ensuring smoother transition for trustees.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/sebi/sebi-extends-compliance-deadline-debenture-trustees-due-operational-challenges.html">SEBI Extends Compliance Deadline for Debenture Trustees Due to Operational Challenges</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/sebi/sebi-extends-compliance-deadline-debenture-trustees-due-operational-challenges.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>IBBI Extends Deadline for Public Comments on Insolvency Reforms to 5 May, 2026</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/ibbi-extends-deadline-public-comments-insolvency-reforms-5-may-2026.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/ibbi-extends-deadline-public-comments-insolvency-reforms-5-may-2026.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[editor2]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 04:20:40 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bankruptcy code]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IBBI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IBC 2016]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1040608</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>IBBI has extended the last date for stakeholder comments on key insolvency discussion papers. The move allows more time for feedback while keeping submission conditions unchanged.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/ibbi-extends-deadline-public-comments-insolvency-reforms-5-may-2026.html">IBBI Extends Deadline for Public Comments on Insolvency Reforms to 5 May, 2026</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/ibbi-extends-deadline-public-comments-insolvency-reforms-5-may-2026.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>CA Profession Not Low-Paying, Says ICAI While Rejecting Misreported Salary Data</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/chartered-accountant/ca-profession-low-paying-icai-rejecting-misreported-salary-data.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/chartered-accountant/ca-profession-low-paying-icai-rejecting-misreported-salary-data.html#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[editor7]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 04:18:05 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[CA, CS, CMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chartered accountants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICAI]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1040582</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The issue involved a media report alleging low returns and poor salaries for Chartered Accountants. The Institute clarified that the profession offers high demand, strong salaries, and diverse opportunities, correcting the misleading narrative.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/chartered-accountant/ca-profession-low-paying-icai-rejecting-misreported-salary-data.html">CA Profession Not Low-Paying, Says ICAI While Rejecting Misreported Salary Data</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/chartered-accountant/ca-profession-low-paying-icai-rejecting-misreported-salary-data.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bombay HC GST Quashed Refund Rejection for Ex Parte Order Without Hearing</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/bombay-hc-gst-quashed-refund-rejection-parte-order-hearing.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/bombay-hc-gst-quashed-refund-rejection-parte-order-hearing.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 04:15:48 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Goods and Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goods And Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high court judgments]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1040577</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The issue was whether a refund rejection without hearing is valid. The Court held that ex parte orders violating procedure are unsustainable and restored the application for fresh consideration.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/bombay-hc-gst-quashed-refund-rejection-parte-order-hearing.html">Bombay HC GST Quashed Refund Rejection for Ex Parte Order Without Hearing</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/bombay-hc-gst-quashed-refund-rejection-parte-order-hearing.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>GST Registration Cancellation Set Aside Due to Vague Show Cause Notice</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gst-registration-cancellation-set-due-vague-show-notice.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gst-registration-cancellation-set-due-vague-show-notice.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 04:12:18 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Goods and Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goods And Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST Registration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high court judgments]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1040529</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The issue was whether a vague notice could justify cancellation of GST registration. The Court held that lack of material particulars invalidates the notice and order, leading to restoration of registration.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gst-registration-cancellation-set-due-vague-show-notice.html">GST Registration Cancellation Set Aside Due to Vague Show Cause Notice</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gst-registration-cancellation-set-due-vague-show-notice.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Drawback for re-export of duty paid goods supplied by SEZ to DTA</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/custom-duty/drawback-re-export-duty-paid-goods-supplied-sez-dta.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/custom-duty/drawback-re-export-duty-paid-goods-supplied-sez-dta.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Editor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 04:09:01 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Custom Duty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Custom Duty Notifications]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1040525</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The issue concerned denial of drawback on re-exported goods supplied from SEZ to DTA. The clarification holds that such supplies qualify as imports, making them eligible for drawback under Section 74.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/custom-duty/drawback-re-export-duty-paid-goods-supplied-sez-dta.html">Drawback for re-export of duty paid goods supplied by SEZ to DTA</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/custom-duty/drawback-re-export-duty-paid-goods-supplied-sez-dta.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Salient Features of Income Tax Act 2025</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/salient-features-income-tax-act-2025.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/salient-features-income-tax-act-2025.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Editor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 04:08:04 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[income tax act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[income tax act 1961]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Income Tax Act 2025]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Income Tax Notifications]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1040537</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The issue was complexity in the existing tax law. It was clarified that the new Act simplifies structure by reducing sections and removing redundancies without changing core policies.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/salient-features-income-tax-act-2025.html">Salient Features of Income Tax Act 2025</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/salient-features-income-tax-act-2025.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wheat Export Still Prohibited But Allowed Due to 25 LMT Relaxation Quota: DGFT</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/dgft/wheat-export-prohibited-allowed-due-25-lmt-relaxation-quota-dgft.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/dgft/wheat-export-prohibited-allowed-due-25-lmt-relaxation-quota-dgft.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Editor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 04:05:36 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[DGFT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DGFT Notifications]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1040511</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The notification retains the prohibition on wheat exports but allows a limited relaxation of 25 LMT. The ruling clarifies that exports can proceed only within specified limits and conditions.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/dgft/wheat-export-prohibited-allowed-due-25-lmt-relaxation-quota-dgft.html">Wheat Export Still Prohibited But Allowed Due to 25 LMT Relaxation Quota: DGFT</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/dgft/wheat-export-prohibited-allowed-due-25-lmt-relaxation-quota-dgft.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>DPIIT Issues Operational Guidelines for ₹10,000 Crore Startup India Fund</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/dpiit-issues-operational-guidelines-rs-10000-crore-startup-india-fund.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/dpiit-issues-operational-guidelines-rs-10000-crore-startup-india-fund.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[editor3]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 04:04:52 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Startup India]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1040506</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The issue concerned operationalising a ₹10,000 crore startup fund. It was established that routing investments through AIFs ensures efficient deployment, private capital mobilisation, and improved governance.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/dpiit-issues-operational-guidelines-rs-10000-crore-startup-india-fund.html">DPIIT Issues Operational Guidelines for ₹10,000 Crore Startup India Fund</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/dpiit-issues-operational-guidelines-rs-10000-crore-startup-india-fund.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Custom Advance Ruling Application Rejected Due to Wrong Jurisdiction Address</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/custom-duty/custom-advance-ruling-application-rejected-due-wrong-jurisdiction-address.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/custom-duty/custom-advance-ruling-application-rejected-due-wrong-jurisdiction-address.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 04:02:18 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Custom Duty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AAR Rulings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advance Ruling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Custom Duty Notifications]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1040558</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Authority declined to hear the case as the applicants address fell outside its jurisdiction. It held that jurisdiction must be determined strictly based on the address provided.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/custom-duty/custom-advance-ruling-application-rejected-due-wrong-jurisdiction-address.html">Custom Advance Ruling Application Rejected Due to Wrong Jurisdiction Address</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/custom-duty/custom-advance-ruling-application-rejected-due-wrong-jurisdiction-address.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Interest on GST Refund After Appeal: Legal Position under Section 56 &amp; Judicial Developments</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/interest-gst-refund-appeal-legal-position-section-56.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/interest-gst-refund-appeal-legal-position-section-56.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Saqif Muchale]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 14:30:45 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Goods and Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goods And Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1040607</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The issue is whether interest on GST refunds should start from a fresh application after appeal. Courts have held that interest must be calculated from the original application date. </p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/interest-gst-refund-appeal-legal-position-section-56.html">Interest on GST Refund After Appeal: Legal Position under Section 56 &#038; Judicial Developments</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/interest-gst-refund-appeal-legal-position-section-56.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>NOC / Tax Clearance Certificate Templates under Section 420 of Income-tax Act, 2025 – Individual &amp; Company (Form No. 156 replacing Form 30C)</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/noc-tax-clearance-certificate-templates-section-420-income-tax-act-2025.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/noc-tax-clearance-certificate-templates-section-420-income-tax-act-2025.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jahangeershabnam]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 14:27:45 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[income tax act 1961]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Income Tax Act 2025]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1040566</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The issue is the replacement of Form 30C under the new tax regime. The update introduces Form 156 with revised procedures and compliance requirements. The key takeaway is that taxpayers must follow the new format for NOC applications from 2026 onwards.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/noc-tax-clearance-certificate-templates-section-420-income-tax-act-2025.html">NOC / Tax Clearance Certificate Templates under Section 420 of Income-tax Act, 2025 – Individual &#038; Company (Form No. 156 replacing Form 30C)</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/noc-tax-clearance-certificate-templates-section-420-income-tax-act-2025.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Startup India Seed Fund Scheme (SISFS)</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/startup-india-seed-fund-scheme-sisfs-2.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/startup-india-seed-fund-scheme-sisfs-2.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[vikashtaxguru]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 14:19:42 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Startup India]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1040488</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>This guide explains who can apply for SISFS and the financial support offered. It highlights that early-stage startups receive funding for proof of concept and commercialization.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/startup-india-seed-fund-scheme-sisfs-2.html">Startup India Seed Fund Scheme (SISFS)</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/startup-india-seed-fund-scheme-sisfs-2.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>NPS: Latest PFRDA Amendments &amp; Tax Benefit</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/nps-latest-pfrda-amendments-tax-benefit.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/nps-latest-pfrda-amendments-tax-benefit.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[vijay]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 14:16:45 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NPS]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1040565</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The issue is understanding complex NPS rules, tax benefits, and recent updates. The framework clarifies withdrawal flexibility, tax treatment, and eligibility.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/nps-latest-pfrda-amendments-tax-benefit.html">NPS: Latest PFRDA Amendments &#038; Tax Benefit</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/nps-latest-pfrda-amendments-tax-benefit.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Comparison of TDS/TCS Sections between Income Tax Act 2025 &amp; 1961</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/comparison-tds-tcs-sections-income-tax-act-2025-income-tax-act-1961.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/comparison-tds-tcs-sections-income-tax-act-2025-income-tax-act-1961.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[AS2014CHH]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 14:09:04 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[income tax act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[income tax act 1961]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Income Tax Act 2025]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TCS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TDS]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1040548</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The issue was the complex and scattered TDS/TCS provisions under the old law. The new Act consolidates multiple sections into a simplified structure, making compliance easier and more transparent. The key takeaway is a streamlined, digital-first framework reducing confusion for taxpayers.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/comparison-tds-tcs-sections-income-tax-act-2025-income-tax-act-1961.html">Comparison of TDS/TCS Sections between Income Tax Act 2025 &#038; 1961</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/comparison-tds-tcs-sections-income-tax-act-2025-income-tax-act-1961.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Comparision of New Income Tax vs Old Income Tax Forms</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/comparision-new-income-tax-vs-old-income-tax-forms.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/comparision-new-income-tax-vs-old-income-tax-forms.html#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[AS2014CHH]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 14:06:41 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Income Tax Act 2025]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1040538</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The issue is complexity and duplication in old tax forms. The new system simplifies compliance through consolidation and structured mapping.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/comparision-new-income-tax-vs-old-income-tax-forms.html">Comparision of New Income Tax vs Old Income Tax Forms</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/comparision-new-income-tax-vs-old-income-tax-forms.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>RBI (Commercial Banks – Capital Charge for Credit Risk – Standardised Approach) Directions, 2026</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/rbi/rbi-commercial-banks-capital-charge-credit-risk-standardised-approach-directions-2026.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/rbi/rbi-commercial-banks-capital-charge-credit-risk-standardised-approach-directions-2026.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[editor7]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 13:49:35 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Fema / RBI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RBI Notifications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reserve bank of india]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1040451</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Directions introduce a structured framework for calculating risk-weighted assets under Basel III norms. The ruling ensures improved consistency, transparency, and risk sensitivity in capital adequacy.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/rbi/rbi-commercial-banks-capital-charge-credit-risk-standardised-approach-directions-2026.html">RBI (Commercial Banks &#8211; Capital Charge for Credit Risk – Standardised Approach) Directions, 2026</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/rbi/rbi-commercial-banks-capital-charge-credit-risk-standardised-approach-directions-2026.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>RBI (Commercial Banks – Asset Classification, Provisioning and Income Recognition) Directions, 2026</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/rbi/rbi-commercial-banks-asset-classification-provisioning-income-recognition-directions-2026.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/rbi/rbi-commercial-banks-asset-classification-provisioning-income-recognition-directions-2026.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[editor8]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 13:43:10 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Fema / RBI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RBI Notifications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reserve bank of india]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1040458</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The issue addresses outdated provisioning methods and introduces a forward-looking ECL model. The key takeaway is improved risk recognition and stronger financial resilience in banks.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/rbi/rbi-commercial-banks-asset-classification-provisioning-income-recognition-directions-2026.html">RBI (Commercial Banks &#8211; Asset Classification, Provisioning and Income Recognition) Directions, 2026</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/rbi/rbi-commercial-banks-asset-classification-provisioning-income-recognition-directions-2026.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>