<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?><rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" version="2.0">

<channel>
	<title>TaxGuru.in - Daily Newsletter</title>
	<atom:link href="https://taxguru.in/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
	<link>https://taxguru.in</link>
	<description>Daily updates for CA, CS, CMA, MBA, Tax and Account Professionals, Advocates on Amendments in Income Tax, MVAT, Company Law, Service Tax, GST, LLP, DGFT, SEBI, RBI, Excise Duty, Custom Duty,  DTC, Corporate Laws, ICAI, ICSI and ICWAI Regulation, FEMA , Government Policies etc.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2026 11:04:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.3</generator>

 
	<xhtml:meta content="noindex" name="robots" xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"/><item>
		<title>Hyderabad ITAT: Reassessment on Same Material Is Change of Opinion</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/hyderabad-itat-reassessment-material-change-opinion.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/hyderabad-itat-reassessment-material-change-opinion.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Vijayakumar Shetty]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2026 10:51:27 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1067380</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hyderabad ITAT quashes reassessment as change of opinion, holding that the same material accepted in scrutiny cannot justify reopening under Section 148.<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/hyderabad-itat-reassessment-material-change-opinion.html">Hyderabad ITAT: Reassessment on Same Material Is Change of Opinion</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/hyderabad-itat-reassessment-material-change-opinion.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Order to Cash (O2C) Cycle: Process, Controls and Metrics</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/order-cash-turning-customer-orders-revenue-cash.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/order-cash-turning-customer-orders-revenue-cash.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gagandeep]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2026 10:48:21 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government Policy]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1067625</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Understand the Order to Cash cycle, key stages, controls and metrics that connect sales, fulfilment, billing, collections and cash flow.<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/order-cash-turning-customer-orders-revenue-cash.html">Order to Cash (O2C) Cycle: Process, Controls and Metrics</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/order-cash-turning-customer-orders-revenue-cash.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Misuse of SARFAESI Act: Borrower Concerns and Banking Practices</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/misuse-sarfaesi-act-borrower-concerns-banking-practices.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/misuse-sarfaesi-act-borrower-concerns-banking-practices.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[subarata banerjee]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2026 10:44:36 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SARFAESI Act]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1067687</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Article examines why job security appeals to youth, highlighting taxation, MSME finance, banking disputes, NPA classification and SARFAESI-related concerns.<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/misuse-sarfaesi-act-borrower-concerns-banking-practices.html">Misuse of SARFAESI Act: Borrower Concerns and Banking Practices</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/misuse-sarfaesi-act-borrower-concerns-banking-practices.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bangalore ITAT: Demonetised Notes for Members’ Loan Recovery Not Taxable U/s 68</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/bangalore-itat-demonetised-notes-members-loan-recovery-not-taxable-68.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/bangalore-itat-demonetised-notes-members-loan-recovery-not-taxable-68.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Vijayakumar Shetty]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2026 10:35:02 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 115BBE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 143(2)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 143(3)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 250]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 68]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 80P]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1067945</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Bangalore ITAT deleted Section 68 addition on SBN loan recoveries, holding the source was explained despite restrictions on accepting demonetised notes.<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/bangalore-itat-demonetised-notes-members-loan-recovery-not-taxable-68.html">Bangalore ITAT: Demonetised Notes for Members’ Loan Recovery Not Taxable U/s 68</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/bangalore-itat-demonetised-notes-members-loan-recovery-not-taxable-68.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Form 48: Accountant’s Report for International &amp; Specified Domestic Transactions</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/form-48-accountants-report-international-domestic-transactions.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/form-48-accountants-report-international-domestic-transactions.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[editor8]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2026 10:34:25 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Income Tax Act 2025]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Income Tax Rules 2026]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Specified Domestic Transaction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transfer Pricing]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1067575</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[CBDT introduces Form 48 under Section 172 for annual reporting of international and specified domestic transactions with structured transfer pricing disclosures.<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/form-48-accountants-report-international-domestic-transactions.html">Form 48: Accountant’s Report for International &#038; Specified Domestic Transactions</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/form-48-accountants-report-international-domestic-transactions.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Foreign Tax Credit – Forms 44 &amp; 45 (Former Form 67)</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/foreign-tax-credit-forms-44-45-form-67.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/foreign-tax-credit-forms-44-45-form-67.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[editor4]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2026 10:33:36 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Tax Credit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Income Tax Act 2025]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Income Tax Rules 2026]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1067524</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[New Forms 44 and 45 simplify foreign tax credit claims, dispute settlement intimation, verification, documents and due dates from 1 April 2026.<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/foreign-tax-credit-forms-44-45-form-67.html">Foreign Tax Credit – Forms 44 &#038; 45 (Former Form 67)</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/foreign-tax-credit-forms-44-45-form-67.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jodhpur ITAT: Provisional U/s 12A/80G Cancellation Requires Specific Notice and Hearing</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/jodhpur-itat-provisional-12a-80g-cancellation-requires-specific-notice-hearing.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/jodhpur-itat-provisional-12a-80g-cancellation-requires-specific-notice-hearing.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Vijayakumar Shetty]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2026 09:39:20 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 12A]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 12AB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 80G]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1067941</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Jodhpur ITAT restores Section 12AB and 80G applications and directs specific notice and hearing before reconsidering provisional registration cancellation.<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/jodhpur-itat-provisional-12a-80g-cancellation-requires-specific-notice-hearing.html">Jodhpur ITAT: Provisional U/s 12A/80G Cancellation Requires Specific Notice and Hearing</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/jodhpur-itat-provisional-12a-80g-cancellation-requires-specific-notice-hearing.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jaipur ITAT: Reassessment Quashing Attains Finality After SC Dismisses Revenue’s SLP</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/jaipur-itat-reassessment-quashing-attains-finality-sc-dismisses-revenues-slp.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/jaipur-itat-reassessment-quashing-attains-finality-sc-dismisses-revenues-slp.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Vijayakumar Shetty]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2026 09:24:20 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 147]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 148A]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 250]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 68]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1067939</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Jaipur ITAT holds Rajasthan HC’s reassessment judgment final after SC dismissed Revenue’s SLP, rejecting the delay-based objection.<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/jaipur-itat-reassessment-quashing-attains-finality-sc-dismisses-revenues-slp.html">Jaipur ITAT: Reassessment Quashing Attains Finality After SC Dismisses Revenue’s SLP</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/jaipur-itat-reassessment-quashing-attains-finality-sc-dismisses-revenues-slp.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jodhpur ITAT: Section 10(23C)(iiiab) Exemption Denied as Grants Were Only 36.47%</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/jodhpur-itat-section-10-23c-iiiab-exemption-denied-grants-36-47-percent.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/jodhpur-itat-section-10-23c-iiiab-exemption-denied-grants-36-47-percent.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Vijayakumar Shetty]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2026 09:14:26 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1067936</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Jodhpur ITAT denies Section 10(23C)(iiiab) exemption as Government grants were 36.47% of receipts, below the 50% threshold.<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/jodhpur-itat-section-10-23c-iiiab-exemption-denied-grants-36-47-percent.html">Jodhpur ITAT: Section 10(23C)(iiiab) Exemption Denied as Grants Were Only 36.47%</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/jodhpur-itat-section-10-23c-iiiab-exemption-denied-grants-36-47-percent.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jodhpur ITAT: NSEL Bad Debt Write-Off Allowable Despite Future Recovery</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/jodhpur-itat-nsel-bad-debt-write-off-allowable-future-recovery.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/jodhpur-itat-nsel-bad-debt-write-off-allowable-future-recovery.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Vijayakumar Shetty]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2026 09:02:48 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 36(1)(vii)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 80IA]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1067933</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[ITAT allows NSEL bad-debt write-offs under Section 36(1)(vii), while remanding the Section 80IA windmill deduction issue for fresh examination.<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/jodhpur-itat-nsel-bad-debt-write-off-allowable-future-recovery.html">Jodhpur ITAT: NSEL Bad Debt Write-Off Allowable Despite Future Recovery</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/jodhpur-itat-nsel-bad-debt-write-off-allowable-future-recovery.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>E-Verification Scheme, Section 260 of Income Tax Act, 2025 &amp; AIS</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/verification-scheme-section-260-income-tax-act-2025-ais.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/verification-scheme-section-260-income-tax-act-2025-ais.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Editor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2026 08:55:57 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Income Tax Act 2025]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=888924</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Income Tax Department's E-Verification Scheme uses AIS data to identify return mismatches, seek explanations and assess further proceedings.<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/verification-scheme-section-260-income-tax-act-2025-ais.html">E-Verification Scheme, Section 260 of Income Tax Act, 2025 &#038; AIS</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/verification-scheme-section-260-income-tax-act-2025-ais.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hyderabad ITAT: Section 80P Deduction Allowed After Delay Condoned u/s 119(2)(b)</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/hyderabad-itat-section-80p-deduction-allowed-delay-condoned-119-2.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/hyderabad-itat-section-80p-deduction-allowed-delay-condoned-119-2.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Vijayakumar Shetty]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2026 08:50:59 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 80P]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1067871</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[ITAT directs AO to reconsider ₹53.82 lakh Section 80P deduction after CCIT condoned the delayed return under Section 119(2)(b).<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/hyderabad-itat-section-80p-deduction-allowed-delay-condoned-119-2.html">Hyderabad ITAT: Section 80P Deduction Allowed After Delay Condoned u/s 119(2)(b)</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/hyderabad-itat-section-80p-deduction-allowed-delay-condoned-119-2.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jodhpur ITAT: Penny Stock LTCG Cannot Be Treated as Bogus Without Linking Evidence</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/jodhpur-itat-penny-stock-ltcg-cannot-treated-bogus-without-linking-evidence.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/jodhpur-itat-penny-stock-ltcg-cannot-treated-bogus-without-linking-evidence.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Vijayakumar Shetty]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2026 08:35:47 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Long Term Capital Gain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 68]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 69C]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Short Term Capital Gain]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1067865</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[ITAT deletes penny stock LTCG additions after finding no evidence linking the assessee to bogus accommodation entries beyond a general Investigation Wing report.<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/jodhpur-itat-penny-stock-ltcg-cannot-treated-bogus-without-linking-evidence.html">Jodhpur ITAT: Penny Stock LTCG Cannot Be Treated as Bogus Without Linking Evidence</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/jodhpur-itat-penny-stock-ltcg-cannot-treated-bogus-without-linking-evidence.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Master File &amp; Country-by-Country Report (CbCR): Forms 56, 57, 58, 59 &amp; 60</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/master-file-country-country-report-cbcr-forms-56-57-58-59-60.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/master-file-country-country-report-cbcr-forms-56-57-58-59-60.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[editor4]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2026 08:35:13 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Income Tax Act 2025]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Income Tax Rules 2026]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1067588</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Income Tax Department introduces Forms 56-60 for Master File and CbCR, with structured filing, specified thresholds, timelines and compliance requirements.<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/master-file-country-country-report-cbcr-forms-56-57-58-59-60.html">Master File &#038; Country-by-Country Report (CbCR): Forms 56, 57, 58, 59 &#038; 60</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/master-file-country-country-report-cbcr-forms-56-57-58-59-60.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Safe Harbour Application – Form 49 (Replaces Forms 3CEFA, 3CEFB &amp; 3CEFC)</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/safe-harbour-application-form-49-replaces-forms-3cefa-3cefb-3cefc.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/safe-harbour-application-form-49-replaces-forms-3cefa-3cefb-3cefc.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[editor8]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2026 08:33:29 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Income Tax Act 2025]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Income Tax Rules 2026]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Safe Harbour Rules]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1067633</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[CBDT introduces Form 49 from 1 April 2026, merging Forms 3CEFA, 3CEFB and 3CEFC for simplified electronic Safe Harbour applications<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/safe-harbour-application-form-49-replaces-forms-3cefa-3cefb-3cefc.html">Safe Harbour Application – Form 49 (Replaces Forms 3CEFA, 3CEFB &#038; 3CEFC)</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/safe-harbour-application-form-49-replaces-forms-3cefa-3cefb-3cefc.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bombay HC: Bogus Purchases Alone Cannot Trigger Section 69C; ₹104.99 Crore Addition Deleted</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/bombay-hc-bogus-purchases-cannot-trigger-section-69c-rs-104-99-crore-addition-deleted.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/bombay-hc-bogus-purchases-cannot-trigger-section-69c-rs-104-99-crore-addition-deleted.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Ajay Kumar Agrawal]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2026 08:00:39 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bogus purchases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high court judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 115BBE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 144B]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 147]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 68]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 69C]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1067596</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Bombay HC upholds deletion of Rs.104.99 crore Section 69C addition, finding the assessee’s explanation supported by documents and inquiry lacking.<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/bombay-hc-bogus-purchases-cannot-trigger-section-69c-rs-104-99-crore-addition-deleted.html">Bombay HC: Bogus Purchases Alone Cannot Trigger Section 69C; ₹104.99 Crore Addition Deleted</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/bombay-hc-bogus-purchases-cannot-trigger-section-69c-rs-104-99-crore-addition-deleted.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>ITAT Delhi: Foreign Life Policy Not Undisclosed Asset; Maturity Proceeds Exempt</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/itat-delhi-foreign-life-policy-not-undisclosed-asset-maturity-proceeds-exempt.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/itat-delhi-foreign-life-policy-not-undisclosed-asset-maturity-proceeds-exempt.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Ajay Kumar Agrawal]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2026 07:55:56 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[black money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1067586</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[ITAT Delhi: Foreign Life Policy Acquired as NRI Not Undisclosed Asset or Taxable Under Black Money Act; Section 10(10D) Exemption Applies to Maturity Proceeds Despite Foreign Insurer<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/itat-delhi-foreign-life-policy-not-undisclosed-asset-maturity-proceeds-exempt.html">ITAT Delhi: Foreign Life Policy Not Undisclosed Asset; Maturity Proceeds Exempt</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/itat-delhi-foreign-life-policy-not-undisclosed-asset-maturity-proceeds-exempt.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hyderabad ITAT: Only 16% of ₹40.93 Crore On-Money Receipts Taxable</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/hyderabad-itat-16-percent-rs-40-93-crore-money-receipts-taxable.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/hyderabad-itat-16-percent-rs-40-93-crore-money-receipts-taxable.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Vijayakumar Shetty]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2026 07:18:38 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 132]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 153A]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1067863</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[ITAT Hyderabad limits tax on ₹40.92 crore on-money receipts to 16% profit, holding seized material must be considered as a whole.<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/hyderabad-itat-16-percent-rs-40-93-crore-money-receipts-taxable.html">Hyderabad ITAT: Only 16% of ₹40.93 Crore On-Money Receipts Taxable</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/hyderabad-itat-16-percent-rs-40-93-crore-money-receipts-taxable.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>ITAT Remands ₹2.15 Crore On-Money Addition Pending Developer’s Appeal Findings</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/itat-remands-rs-2-15-crore-money-addition-pending-developers-appeal-findings.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/itat-remands-rs-2-15-crore-money-addition-pending-developers-appeal-findings.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Vijayakumar Shetty]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2026 07:00:29 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 132]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 143(2)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 143(3)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 270A]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 56]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1067861</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[ITAT remands ₹2.15 crore on-money addition for fresh adjudication after noting the same seized documents were central to the developer’s pending appeal.<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/itat-remands-rs-2-15-crore-money-addition-pending-developers-appeal-findings.html">ITAT Remands ₹2.15 Crore On-Money Addition Pending Developer’s Appeal Findings</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/itat-remands-rs-2-15-crore-money-addition-pending-developers-appeal-findings.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hyderabad ITAT: ₹2.55 Crore “On-Money” Additions Deleted for Lack of Corroboration</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/hyderabad-itat-rs-2-55-crore-money-additions-deleted-lack-corroboration.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/hyderabad-itat-rs-2-55-crore-money-additions-deleted-lack-corroboration.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Vijayakumar Shetty]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2026 06:17:52 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 132]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 147]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 148]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 269ST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 270A]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 56]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1067856</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hyderabad ITAT deletes ₹2.55 crore on-money additions, holding third-party seized material without independent corroborative evidence cannot sustain additions.<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/hyderabad-itat-rs-2-55-crore-money-additions-deleted-lack-corroboration.html">Hyderabad ITAT: ₹2.55 Crore “On-Money” Additions Deleted for Lack of Corroboration</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/hyderabad-itat-rs-2-55-crore-money-additions-deleted-lack-corroboration.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hyderabad ITAT: Full 10(10B) Exemption for BSNL VRS-2019; 1,811-Day Delay Condoned</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/hyderabad-itat-full-10-10b-exemption-bsnl-vrs-2019-1-811-day-delay-condoned.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/hyderabad-itat-full-10-10b-exemption-bsnl-vrs-2019-1-811-day-delay-condoned.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Vijayakumar Shetty]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2026 05:54:02 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1067848</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hyderabad ITAT allows Section 10(10B) exemption for BSNL VRS-2019 compensation and condones delays up to 1,811 days, subject to eligibility verification.<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/hyderabad-itat-full-10-10b-exemption-bsnl-vrs-2019-1-811-day-delay-condoned.html">Hyderabad ITAT: Full 10(10B) Exemption for BSNL VRS-2019; 1,811-Day Delay Condoned</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/hyderabad-itat-full-10-10b-exemption-bsnl-vrs-2019-1-811-day-delay-condoned.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>SC: AWS Cloud Receipts Not Royalty or FTS/FIS</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/sc-aws-cloud-receipts-not-royalty-fts-fis.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/sc-aws-cloud-receipts-not-royalty-fts-fis.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Ajay Kumar Agrawal]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2026 05:52:27 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme court judgements]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1067574</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[SC dismisses Revenues challenge to Delhi HC ruling that AWS cloud computing receipts were not taxable as equipment royalty under India-US DTAA.<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/sc-aws-cloud-receipts-not-royalty-fts-fis.html">SC: AWS Cloud Receipts Not Royalty or FTS/FIS</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/sc-aws-cloud-receipts-not-royalty-fts-fis.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Telangana HC Allows GSTAT Appeal Against Retrospective ITC Reversal Under Rule 42(3)</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/telangana-hc-gstat-appeal-against-retrospective-itc-reversal-rule-42-3.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/telangana-hc-gstat-appeal-against-retrospective-itc-reversal-rule-42-3.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ADV AKRUTI GOYAL]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2026 05:39:24 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Goods and Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goods And Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GSTAT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high court judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[input tax credit]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1067685</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Telangana HC allowed taxpayer to approach GSTAT against retrospective Rule 42(3) ITC reversal, with liberty to raise all legal and factual grounds.<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/telangana-hc-gstat-appeal-against-retrospective-itc-reversal-rule-42-3.html">Telangana HC Allows GSTAT Appeal Against Retrospective ITC Reversal Under Rule 42(3)</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/telangana-hc-gstat-appeal-against-retrospective-itc-reversal-rule-42-3.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Appeal Allowed Against Section 73 GST Order, Delay to Be Considered: Telangana HC</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/appeal-allowed-against-section-73-gst-order-delay-considered-telangana-hc.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/appeal-allowed-against-section-73-gst-order-delay-considered-telangana-hc.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ADV AKRUTI GOYAL]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2026 05:39:19 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Goods and Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goods And Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high court judgments]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1067689</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Telangana HC allows appeal against Section 73 GST order, directing the appellate authority to consider delay condonation and decide merits if satisfied.<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/appeal-allowed-against-section-73-gst-order-delay-considered-telangana-hc.html">Appeal Allowed Against Section 73 GST Order, Delay to Be Considered: Telangana HC</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/appeal-allowed-against-section-73-gst-order-delay-considered-telangana-hc.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>SC Declines Interference With Penalty Deletion Over Ambiguous Section 271(1)(c) Notice</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/sc-declines-interference-penalty-deletion-ambiguous-section-271-1-notice.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/sc-declines-interference-penalty-deletion-ambiguous-section-271-1-notice.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Ajay Kumar Agrawal]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2026 05:30:55 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme court judgements]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1067619</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[SC declines interference with HC order upholding penalty deletion over an ambiguous Section 271(1)(c) notice; question of law kept open.<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/sc-declines-interference-penalty-deletion-ambiguous-section-271-1-notice.html">SC Declines Interference With Penalty Deletion Over Ambiguous Section 271(1)(c) Notice</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/sc-declines-interference-penalty-deletion-ambiguous-section-271-1-notice.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bombay HC: Ambiguous Section 271(1)(c) Notice Invalidates Penalty</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/bombay-hc-ambiguous-section-271-1-notice-invalidates-penalty.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/bombay-hc-ambiguous-section-271-1-notice-invalidates-penalty.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2026 05:28:10 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high court judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Income Tax Penalty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Penalty for Concealment of Income]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 271(1)(c)]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1067608</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Bombay HC dismisses Revenue appeal, holding ambiguous Section 271(1)(c) penalty notice cannot sustain penalty where irrelevant limbs were not struck off.<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/bombay-hc-ambiguous-section-271-1-notice-invalidates-penalty.html">Bombay HC: Ambiguous Section 271(1)(c) Notice Invalidates Penalty</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/bombay-hc-ambiguous-section-271-1-notice-invalidates-penalty.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lucknow ITAT: Sales Spike Alone Cannot Tax Demonetisation Cash as Unexplained</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/lucknow-itat-sales-spike-cannot-tax-demonetisation-cash-unexplained.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/lucknow-itat-sales-spike-cannot-tax-demonetisation-cash-unexplained.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Vijayakumar Shetty]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2026 05:15:09 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 115BBE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 143(3)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 271AAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 68]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 69A]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1067828</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Lucknow ITAT deletes ₹1.075 crore addition, holding recorded demonetisation cash sales cannot be taxed as unexplained money merely due to a sales spike.<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/lucknow-itat-sales-spike-cannot-tax-demonetisation-cash-unexplained.html">Lucknow ITAT: Sales Spike Alone Cannot Tax Demonetisation Cash as Unexplained</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/lucknow-itat-sales-spike-cannot-tax-demonetisation-cash-unexplained.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>BSNL VRS-2019 Compensation Gets Full Sec. 10(10B) Exemption; ITAT Condones 1,404-Day Delay</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/bsnl-vrs-2019-compensation-full-sec-10-10b-exemption-itat-condones-1-404-day-delay.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/bsnl-vrs-2019-compensation-full-sec-10-10b-exemption-itat-condones-1-404-day-delay.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Vijayakumar Shetty]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2026 04:58:32 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1067826</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hyderabad ITAT condones 1,404-day delay and holds BSNL VRS-2019 compensation eligible for Section 10(10B) exemption, subject to workman verification.<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/bsnl-vrs-2019-compensation-full-sec-10-10b-exemption-itat-condones-1-404-day-delay.html">BSNL VRS-2019 Compensation Gets Full Sec. 10(10B) Exemption; ITAT Condones 1,404-Day Delay</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/bsnl-vrs-2019-compensation-full-sec-10-10b-exemption-itat-condones-1-404-day-delay.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Significant advantages of IFSC in India over IFSC in Singapore</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/finance/significant-advantages-ifsc-india-ifsc-singapore.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/finance/significant-advantages-ifsc-india-ifsc-singapore.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Satish Agarwal]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2026 04:34:39 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IFSCA]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1067601</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[GIFT IFSC offers India-linked international finance, unified regulation, foreign-currency operations, treasury, funds and leasing opportunities alongside Singapore.<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/finance/significant-advantages-ifsc-india-ifsc-singapore.html">Significant advantages of IFSC in India over IFSC in Singapore</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/finance/significant-advantages-ifsc-india-ifsc-singapore.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Stamp Duty Cannot Be Levied Before Issuance of SARFAESI Sale Certificate: Bombay HC</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/stamp-duty-cannot-levied-issuance-sarfaesi-sale-certificate-bombay-hc.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/stamp-duty-cannot-levied-issuance-sarfaesi-sale-certificate-bombay-hc.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adv Prakash K Pandya]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2026 04:32:22 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bankruptcy code]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IBC 2016]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indian stamp act 1899]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SARFAESI Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stamp duty]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1067598</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Bombay HC holds stamp duty cannot be demanded merely for Section 89(4) filing of IBC sale certificates; liability arises on registration or specified use.<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/stamp-duty-cannot-levied-issuance-sarfaesi-sale-certificate-bombay-hc.html">Stamp Duty Cannot Be Levied Before Issuance of SARFAESI Sale Certificate: Bombay HC</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/stamp-duty-cannot-levied-issuance-sarfaesi-sale-certificate-bombay-hc.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>GST Limitation Periods: Section 73, 74 &amp; 74A for SCNs, Orders and Record Retention</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gst-limitation-periods-section-73-74-74a-scns-orders-record-retention.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gst-limitation-periods-section-73-74-74a-scns-orders-record-retention.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Neeraj Bhagat &#38; Co.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2026 04:16:51 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Goods and Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goods And Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST Notifications]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1067535</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[GST limitation timelines under Sections 73, 74 and 74A, including SCN, order deadlines and 72-month record retention requirements.<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gst-limitation-periods-section-73-74-74a-scns-orders-record-retention.html">GST Limitation Periods: Section 73, 74 &#038; 74A for SCNs, Orders and Record Retention</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gst-limitation-periods-section-73-74-74a-scns-orders-record-retention.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>SC: DVO Reference Valid After Rejection of Books of Account</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/sc-dvo-reference-valid-rejection-books-account.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/sc-dvo-reference-valid-rejection-books-account.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Ajay Kumar Agrawal]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2026 04:00:41 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme court judgements]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1067562</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[SC declines interference with Section 69B addition, holding that the DVO reference followed rejection of books after discrepancies were recorded by the AO.<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/sc-dvo-reference-valid-rejection-books-account.html">SC: DVO Reference Valid After Rejection of Books of Account</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/sc-dvo-reference-valid-rejection-books-account.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Section 263 Not Invocable for Non-Initiation of Section 270A Penalty: ITAT Ahmedabad</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/section-263-not-invocable-non-initiation-section-270a-penalty-itat-ahmedabad.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/section-263-not-invocable-non-initiation-section-270a-penalty-itat-ahmedabad.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Ajay Kumar Agrawal]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2026 03:59:45 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 132]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 143(3)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 263]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 270A]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TDS]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1067567</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[ITAT Ahmedabad quashes Section 263 revision, finding no under-reporting and holding Section 270A penalty initiation discretionary.<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/section-263-not-invocable-non-initiation-section-270a-penalty-itat-ahmedabad.html">Section 263 Not Invocable for Non-Initiation of Section 270A Penalty: ITAT Ahmedabad</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/section-263-not-invocable-non-initiation-section-270a-penalty-itat-ahmedabad.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rights Issue Offer Periods &amp; Exemptions Under Companies Act, 2013</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/company-law/rights-issue-offer-periods-exemptions-companies-act-2013.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/company-law/rights-issue-offer-periods-exemptions-companies-act-2013.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pradyumna Nagar]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2026 03:54:47 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Company Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Companies Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Companies Act 2013]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1067498</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Private companies can reduce rights issue timelines with 90% member consent, including the 3-day dispatch and 7-day minimum offer periods.<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/company-law/rights-issue-offer-periods-exemptions-companies-act-2013.html">Rights Issue Offer Periods &#038; Exemptions Under Companies Act, 2013</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/company-law/rights-issue-offer-periods-exemptions-companies-act-2013.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>सपने में अरुण जेटली जी आए… बोले-अब तो जीएसटी पोर्टल सही है ना?</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/arun-jaitley-ji-appeared-dream-and-asked-gst-portal-working-fine.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/arun-jaitley-ji-appeared-dream-and-asked-gst-portal-working-fine.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ADVABHISHEKKALRA]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2026 03:50:48 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Goods and Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goods And Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hindi Articles]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1067433</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[जीएसटी पोर्टल में सुधार के बावजूद डेटा मिलान, तकनीकी गलतियों, नोटिस और शून्य विवरणी से जुड़ी अनुपालन चुनौतियों पर चर्चा।<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/arun-jaitley-ji-appeared-dream-and-asked-gst-portal-working-fine.html">सपने में अरुण जेटली जी आए… बोले-अब तो जीएसटी पोर्टल सही है ना?</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/arun-jaitley-ji-appeared-dream-and-asked-gst-portal-working-fine.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>One Taxpayer, One Liability: Protection from Parallel GST Proceedings</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/one-taxpayer-one-liability-protection-parallel-gst-proceedings.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/one-taxpayer-one-liability-protection-parallel-gst-proceedings.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[S PRASAD]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2026 03:39:39 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Goods and Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goods And Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1067502</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Section 6(2)(b) protects taxpayers from parallel GST adjudication where authorities pursue the same or overlapping tax liability.<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/one-taxpayer-one-liability-protection-parallel-gst-proceedings.html">One Taxpayer, One Liability: Protection from Parallel GST Proceedings</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/one-taxpayer-one-liability-protection-parallel-gst-proceedings.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>GST Adjudication and Appeal Roadmap From SCN to Supreme Court</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gst-adjudication-appeal-roadmap-scn-supreme-court.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gst-adjudication-appeal-roadmap-scn-supreme-court.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rahul Mishra]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2026 03:36:52 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Goods and Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goods And Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1067504</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Understand the GST dispute process from DRC-01A and SCN to adjudication, appeals, GSTAT, High Court and Supreme Court under key GST sections.<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gst-adjudication-appeal-roadmap-scn-supreme-court.html">GST Adjudication and Appeal Roadmap From SCN to Supreme Court</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gst-adjudication-appeal-roadmap-scn-supreme-court.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Digital Personal Data Protection Advisory Manual for Chartered Accountants</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/digital-personal-data-protection-advisory-manual-chartered-accountants.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/digital-personal-data-protection-advisory-manual-chartered-accountants.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2026 19:07:43 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chartered accountants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DPDP Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DPDP Rules 2025]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1067755</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[DPDP Act 2023 and Rules 2025 establish phased data protection duties, with compliance, audit and advisory requirements for Chartered Accountants.<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/digital-personal-data-protection-advisory-manual-chartered-accountants.html">Digital Personal Data Protection Advisory Manual for Chartered Accountants</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/digital-personal-data-protection-advisory-manual-chartered-accountants.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>SC: Divergent Views on Bias &amp; Natural Justice in Shiksha Karmi Selection; Larger Bench to Decide</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/sc-divergent-views-bias-natural-justice-shiksha-karmi-selection-larger-bench-decide.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/sc-divergent-views-bias-natural-justice-shiksha-karmi-selection-larger-bench-decide.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2026 18:55:41 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme court judgements]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1067488</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[SC allows appeals in Shiksha Karmi selection case, finding breach of natural justice at the Collector stage and restoring appointments with service benefits.<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/sc-divergent-views-bias-natural-justice-shiksha-karmi-selection-larger-bench-decide.html">SC: Divergent Views on Bias &#038; Natural Justice in Shiksha Karmi Selection; Larger Bench to Decide</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/sc-divergent-views-bias-natural-justice-shiksha-karmi-selection-larger-bench-decide.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>CENVAT Credit Cannot Be Denied After Accepting Broadcasting Status: Bombay HC</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/excise-duty/cenvat-credit-cannot-denied-accepting-broadcasting-status-bombay-hc.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/excise-duty/cenvat-credit-cannot-denied-accepting-broadcasting-status-bombay-hc.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2026 18:53:15 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Excise Duty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CENVAT Credit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goods And Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high court judgments]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1067527</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Bombay HC dismisses Revenue appeal, holding no substantial question arose on CENVAT credit for broadcasting services, including specified input services.<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/excise-duty/cenvat-credit-cannot-denied-accepting-broadcasting-status-bombay-hc.html">CENVAT Credit Cannot Be Denied After Accepting Broadcasting Status: Bombay HC</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/excise-duty/cenvat-credit-cannot-denied-accepting-broadcasting-status-bombay-hc.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>IAC Cannot Re-Examine Investments Approved by Excise Commissioner: Gauhati HC</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/excise-duty/iac-cannot-examine-investments-approved-excise-commissioner-gauhati-hc.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/excise-duty/iac-cannot-examine-investments-approved-excise-commissioner-gauhati-hc.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2026 18:52:17 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Excise Duty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high court judgments]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1067541</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Gauhati HC set aside IACs rejection of investments under NER excise exemption notifications, holding its role was limited after Commissioner-approved escrow withdrawals.<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/excise-duty/iac-cannot-examine-investments-approved-excise-commissioner-gauhati-hc.html">IAC Cannot Re-Examine Investments Approved by Excise Commissioner: Gauhati HC</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/excise-duty/iac-cannot-examine-investments-approved-excise-commissioner-gauhati-hc.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>TDS Paid Under Section 195A Not Subject to Service Tax: CESTAT Chandigarh</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/service-tax/tds-paid-section-195a-not-subject-service-tax-cestat-chandigarh.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/service-tax/tds-paid-section-195a-not-subject-service-tax-cestat-chandigarh.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2026 18:51:30 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Service Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cestat judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TDS]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1067559</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[CESTAT Chandigarh excludes TDS paid under Section 195A from service tax value and rejects extended limitation absent suppression or intent to evade tax.<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/service-tax/tds-paid-section-195a-not-subject-service-tax-cestat-chandigarh.html">TDS Paid Under Section 195A Not Subject to Service Tax: CESTAT Chandigarh</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/service-tax/tds-paid-section-195a-not-subject-service-tax-cestat-chandigarh.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>SC: Imported Sugar Eligible for KST Exemption Before 2001 Amendment</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/sc-imported-sugar-eligible-kst-exemption-2001-amendment.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/sc-imported-sugar-eligible-kst-exemption-2001-amendment.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2026 18:42:52 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Goods and Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sales Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme court judgements]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1067551</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[SC upholds retrospective restriction of sugar exemption but bars penalty and limits interest; reassessment must follow KST and CST provisions.<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/sc-imported-sugar-eligible-kst-exemption-2001-amendment.html">SC: Imported Sugar Eligible for KST Exemption Before 2001 Amendment</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/sc-imported-sugar-eligible-kst-exemption-2001-amendment.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>GSTR-3B Table 4(A): ITC, GSTR-2B Auto-Population and Rectification – FAQs</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gstr-3b-table-4-itc-gstr-2b-auto-population-rectification-faqs.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gstr-3b-table-4-itc-gstr-2b-auto-population-rectification-faqs.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sushil Kumar Antal]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2026 18:40:27 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Goods and Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FAQs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goods And Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST FAQs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST Notifications]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1067509</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[ICAI FAQs explain GSTR-3B ITC reporting and state that import-service RCM ITC misclassified in 4(A)(3) need not be denied if otherwise eligible.<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gstr-3b-table-4-itc-gstr-2b-auto-population-rectification-faqs.html">GSTR-3B Table 4(A): ITC, GSTR-2B Auto-Population and Rectification – FAQs</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gstr-3b-table-4-itc-gstr-2b-auto-population-rectification-faqs.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>GST Rule 86B 1% Cash Payment Requirement: FAQs</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gst-rule-86b-1-percent-cash-payment-requirement-faqs.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gst-rule-86b-1-percent-cash-payment-requirement-faqs.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sushil Kumar Antal]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2026 18:39:03 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Goods and Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FAQs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goods And Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST FAQs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST Notifications]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1067519</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Rule 86B requires 1% cash payment in specified cases. FAQs explain thresholds, RCM exclusion, cumulative exceptions, ITC excess use and regularisation.<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gst-rule-86b-1-percent-cash-payment-requirement-faqs.html">GST Rule 86B 1% Cash Payment Requirement: FAQs</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gst-rule-86b-1-percent-cash-payment-requirement-faqs.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Understanding ITC Reversal and Reclaim under GSTR-3B: FAQs</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/understanding-itc-reversal-reclaim-gstr-3b-faqs.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/understanding-itc-reversal-reclaim-gstr-3b-faqs.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sushil Kumar Antal]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2026 18:30:11 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Goods and Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FAQs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goods And Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST FAQs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST Notifications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GSTR 3B]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[input tax credit]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1067585</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Learn the GSTR-3B treatment of ITC reversals under 4(B)(1), 4(B)(2), 4(A)(5) and 4(D)(1), including inadvertent reversal correction.<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/understanding-itc-reversal-reclaim-gstr-3b-faqs.html">Understanding ITC Reversal and Reclaim under GSTR-3B: FAQs</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/understanding-itc-reversal-reclaim-gstr-3b-faqs.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>When Does GST Lis Commence? Delhi HC Settles Section 107(6) Pre-Deposit Law</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gst-lis-commence-delhi-hc-settles-section-107-6-pre-deposit-law.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gst-lis-commence-delhi-hc-settles-section-107-6-pre-deposit-law.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA (Adv) Sikander Sachdeva]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2026 18:25:51 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Goods and Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CGST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goods And Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1067518</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Delhi HC held the SCN commences the lis and the pre-01.10.2025 appellate regime applies where the SCN preceded the Section 107(6) amendment.<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gst-lis-commence-delhi-hc-settles-section-107-6-pre-deposit-law.html">When Does GST Lis Commence? Delhi HC Settles Section 107(6) Pre-Deposit Law</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gst-lis-commence-delhi-hc-settles-section-107-6-pre-deposit-law.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Advocate Protest Cannot Obstruct Lawful Production of Accused Before Court: Madras HC</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/advocate-protest-cannot-obstruct-lawful-production-accused-court-madras-hc.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/advocate-protest-cannot-obstruct-lawful-production-accused-court-madras-hc.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sanjeev Sirohi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2026 18:17:30 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high court judgments]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1067507</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Madras HC quashes FIR under Section 225 IPC subject to regret, while holding that preventing police from producing arrested advocates prima facie attracts the offence.<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/advocate-protest-cannot-obstruct-lawful-production-accused-court-madras-hc.html">Advocate Protest Cannot Obstruct Lawful Production of Accused Before Court: Madras HC</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/advocate-protest-cannot-obstruct-lawful-production-accused-court-madras-hc.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Panaji ITAT: AO Cannot Tax Loan Merely Doubting Creditor’s Creditworthiness</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/panaji-itat-deletes-rs-32-25-lakh-section-68-addition-assessee-explains-source.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/panaji-itat-deletes-rs-32-25-lakh-section-68-addition-assessee-explains-source.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Vijayakumar Shetty]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2026 18:05:11 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 115BBE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 143(2)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 143(3)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 44AD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 68]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1067362</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Panaji ITAT deleted ₹32.25 lakh Section 68 addition after the assessee explained the loan’s nature, source and source of source with evidence.<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/panaji-itat-deletes-rs-32-25-lakh-section-68-addition-assessee-explains-source.html">Panaji ITAT: AO Cannot Tax Loan Merely Doubting Creditor’s Creditworthiness</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/panaji-itat-deletes-rs-32-25-lakh-section-68-addition-assessee-explains-source.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>1 April Notice Date Prevails Over 31 March: Rajkot ITAT Quashes ₹1.33 Cr Penny-Stock Addition</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/rajkot-itat-quashes-rs-1-33-cr-penny-stock-addition-1-april-issue-date-prevails-31-march.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/rajkot-itat-quashes-rs-1-33-cr-penny-stock-addition-1-april-issue-date-prevails-31-march.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Vijayakumar Shetty]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2026 17:26:35 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HUF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 115BBE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 147]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 148]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 148A]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 250]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 68]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1067166</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Rajkot ITAT quashes ₹1.33 crore reassessment as section 148 notice issued on 1 April 2021 required compliance with the new section 148A regime.<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/rajkot-itat-quashes-rs-1-33-cr-penny-stock-addition-1-april-issue-date-prevails-31-march.html">1 April Notice Date Prevails Over 31 March: Rajkot ITAT Quashes ₹1.33 Cr Penny-Stock Addition</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/rajkot-itat-quashes-rs-1-33-cr-penny-stock-addition-1-april-issue-date-prevails-31-march.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>BSNL VRS-2019 Compensation Exempt u/s 10(10B) as Retrenchment Pay: ITAT Nagpur</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/bsnl-vrs-2019-compensation-exempt-10-10b-retrenchment-pay-itat-nagpur.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/bsnl-vrs-2019-compensation-exempt-10-10b-retrenchment-pay-itat-nagpur.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Vijayakumar Shetty]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2026 15:35:19 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 250]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1067387</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Nagpur ITAT held BSNL VRS-2019 compensation is capital receipt and retrenchment compensation exempt under Section 10(10B), not Section 10(10C).<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/bsnl-vrs-2019-compensation-exempt-10-10b-retrenchment-pay-itat-nagpur.html">BSNL VRS-2019 Compensation Exempt u/s 10(10B) as Retrenchment Pay: ITAT Nagpur</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/bsnl-vrs-2019-compensation-exempt-10-10b-retrenchment-pay-itat-nagpur.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hyderabad ITAT: Merits Decision Impliedly Condoned Delay in Appeal</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/hyderabad-itat-merits-decision-impliedly-condoned-delay-appeal.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/hyderabad-itat-merits-decision-impliedly-condoned-delay-appeal.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Vijayakumar Shetty]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2026 13:15:27 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 144]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 147]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 69A]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1067853</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hyderabad ITAT held delay impliedly condoned after CIT(A) decided the appeal on merits and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication with hearing.<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/hyderabad-itat-merits-decision-impliedly-condoned-delay-appeal.html">Hyderabad ITAT: Merits Decision Impliedly Condoned Delay in Appeal</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/hyderabad-itat-merits-decision-impliedly-condoned-delay-appeal.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>ITAT: Deletes ₹8.66 Lakh Section 69A Addition, Rejects 60% Rate for AY 2017-18</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/itat-deletes-rs-8-66-lakh-section-69a-addition-rejects-60-percent-rate-ay-2017-18.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/itat-deletes-rs-8-66-lakh-section-69a-addition-rejects-60-percent-rate-ay-2017-18.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Vijayakumar Shetty]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2026 13:00:59 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 115BBE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 148]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 69A]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1067820</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hyderabad ITAT deletes ₹8.66 lakh Section 69A addition and rejects 60% Section 115BBE rate for AY 2017-18, remanding ₹2.96 lakh for verification.<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/itat-deletes-rs-8-66-lakh-section-69a-addition-rejects-60-percent-rate-ay-2017-18.html">ITAT: Deletes ₹8.66 Lakh Section 69A Addition, Rejects 60% Rate for AY 2017-18</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/itat-deletes-rs-8-66-lakh-section-69a-addition-rejects-60-percent-rate-ay-2017-18.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Panaji ITAT Quashes Section 147 Reassessment When No Addition Made on Reopened Issue</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/panaji-itat-quashes-section-147-reassessment-no-addition-reopened-issue.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/panaji-itat-quashes-section-147-reassessment-no-addition-reopened-issue.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Vijayakumar Shetty]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2026 09:52:18 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 144]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 144B]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 147]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 148]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 80P]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1067364</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Panaji ITAT quashed Section 147 reassessment where no addition was made on cash deposits forming the reopening basis and Section 80P was disallowed without fresh notice.<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/panaji-itat-quashes-section-147-reassessment-no-addition-reopened-issue.html">Panaji ITAT Quashes Section 147 Reassessment When No Addition Made on Reopened Issue</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/panaji-itat-quashes-section-147-reassessment-no-addition-reopened-issue.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hyderabad ITAT: ₹12.69 Lakh Demonetisation Cash Addition Deleted for Explained Bank Withdrawals</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/hyderabad-itat-deletes-rs-12-69-lakh-demonetisation-cash-addition-bank-statements-cannot-disregarded.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/hyderabad-itat-deletes-rs-12-69-lakh-demonetisation-cash-addition-bank-statements-cannot-disregarded.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Vijayakumar Shetty]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2026 09:05:05 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Demonetization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 144]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 69A]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1067384</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hyderabad ITAT deleted ₹12.69 lakh Section 69A addition after bank and loan statements established the source of demonetisation-period cash deposits.<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/hyderabad-itat-deletes-rs-12-69-lakh-demonetisation-cash-addition-bank-statements-cannot-disregarded.html">Hyderabad ITAT: ₹12.69 Lakh Demonetisation Cash Addition Deleted for Explained Bank Withdrawals</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/hyderabad-itat-deletes-rs-12-69-lakh-demonetisation-cash-addition-bank-statements-cannot-disregarded.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Survey Income Is Part of Book Profit for Partners’ Remuneration u/s 40(b): ITAT Panaji</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/survey-income-included-book-profit-partners-remuneration-40-panaji-itat.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/survey-income-included-book-profit-partners-remuneration-40-panaji-itat.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Vijayakumar Shetty]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2026 06:54:04 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 143(2)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 143(3)]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1067358</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Panaji ITAT allowed partners’ remuneration on survey income included in book profit and deleted a ₹1.26 lakh bank-balance addition.<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/survey-income-included-book-profit-partners-remuneration-40-panaji-itat.html">Survey Income Is Part of Book Profit for Partners’ Remuneration u/s 40(b): ITAT Panaji</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/survey-income-included-book-profit-partners-remuneration-40-panaji-itat.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Panaji ITAT Allows Section 80P(2)(d) on Interest from Co-operative Banks</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/panaji-itat-section-80p-2-interest-operative-banks.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/panaji-itat-section-80p-2-interest-operative-banks.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Vijayakumar Shetty]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2026 06:42:55 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 143(3)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 80P]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1067356</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Panaji ITAT allowed ₹15.95 lakh deduction under Section 80P(2)(d) for co-operative bank interest and reversed the CIT(A) disallowance.<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/panaji-itat-section-80p-2-interest-operative-banks.html">Panaji ITAT Allows Section 80P(2)(d) on Interest from Co-operative Banks</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/panaji-itat-section-80p-2-interest-operative-banks.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rajkot ITAT: ₹8.91 Cr Reassessment Quashed as Notice Issued to Dissolved Firm</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/rajkot-itat-quashes-rs-8-91-crore-reassessment-against-dissolved-firm-notice-non-existent-entity-void.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/rajkot-itat-quashes-rs-8-91-crore-reassessment-against-dissolved-firm-notice-non-existent-entity-void.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Vijayakumar Shetty]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2026 06:15:21 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 143(3)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 144]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 144B]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 147]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 148]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 149]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 250]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 44AD]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1067163</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Panaji ITAT quashes ₹8.91 crore reassessment against dissolved firm, holding notice to non-existent entity invalid and same income already taxed in successor’s hands.<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/rajkot-itat-quashes-rs-8-91-crore-reassessment-against-dissolved-firm-notice-non-existent-entity-void.html">Rajkot ITAT: ₹8.91 Cr Reassessment Quashed as Notice Issued to Dissolved Firm</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/rajkot-itat-quashes-rs-8-91-crore-reassessment-against-dissolved-firm-notice-non-existent-entity-void.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Panaji ITAT: Partner Remuneration Cannot Be Taxed Twice – ₹2.98 Lakh Addition Deleted</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/panaji-itat-deletes-rs-2-98-lakh-double-taxation-partner-remuneration-taxed.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/panaji-itat-deletes-rs-2-98-lakh-double-taxation-partner-remuneration-taxed.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Vijayakumar Shetty]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2026 06:02:25 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 143(3)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 144]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 147]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1067160</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Panaji ITAT deleted ₹2.98 lakh from a firm’s assessment as the same partner remuneration was already taxed in the partner’s hands for AY 2013-14.<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/panaji-itat-deletes-rs-2-98-lakh-double-taxation-partner-remuneration-taxed.html">Panaji ITAT: Partner Remuneration Cannot Be Taxed Twice – ₹2.98 Lakh Addition Deleted</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/panaji-itat-deletes-rs-2-98-lakh-double-taxation-partner-remuneration-taxed.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Section 10(23C)(iiiad) Exemption Restored: CIT(A) Cannot Reject Fresh Claim – Panaji ITAT</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/panaji-itat-restores-section-10-23c-iiiad-exemption-claim-prior-ao-claim-not-mandatory.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/panaji-itat-restores-section-10-23c-iiiad-exemption-claim-prior-ao-claim-not-mandatory.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Vijayakumar Shetty]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2026 05:50:07 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 143(2)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 144B]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 147]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 148A]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 149]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 151A]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1067158</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Panaji ITAT restored an educational society’s Section 10(23C)(iiiad) exemption claim to the AO for fresh assessment for AYs 2018-19 and 2019-20.<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/panaji-itat-restores-section-10-23c-iiiad-exemption-claim-prior-ao-claim-not-mandatory.html">Section 10(23C)(iiiad) Exemption Restored: CIT(A) Cannot Reject Fresh Claim &#8211; Panaji ITAT</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/panaji-itat-restores-section-10-23c-iiiad-exemption-claim-prior-ao-claim-not-mandatory.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Panaji ITAT Allows Section 80P Deduction on Bank Deposits of Credit Co-operative Society</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/panaji-itat-section-80p-deduction-bank-deposits-credit-operative-society.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/panaji-itat-section-80p-deduction-bank-deposits-credit-operative-society.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Vijayakumar Shetty]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2026 05:35:35 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 143(2)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 143(3)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 263]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 80P]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1067154</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Panaji ITAT allowed Section 80P(2)(a)(i) deduction on bank interest, holding deposits of a credit co-op society attributable to banking business.<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/panaji-itat-section-80p-deduction-bank-deposits-credit-operative-society.html">Panaji ITAT Allows Section 80P Deduction on Bank Deposits of Credit Co-operative Society</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/panaji-itat-section-80p-deduction-bank-deposits-credit-operative-society.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Panaji ITAT: Section 148 Notices Beyond Surviving Limitation Quashed Under Rajeev Bansal</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/panaji-itat-quashes-reassessments-ay-2016-17-2017-18-section-148-notices-limitation-invalid.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/panaji-itat-quashes-reassessments-ay-2016-17-2017-18-section-148-notices-limitation-invalid.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Vijayakumar Shetty]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2026 05:15:13 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 143(2)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 144]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 144B]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 147]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 148]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 149]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 69C]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1067151</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Panaji ITAT quashed AY 2016-17 and 2017-18 reassessments as Section 148 notices issued on 27.07.2022 exceeded the surviving limitation.<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/panaji-itat-quashes-reassessments-ay-2016-17-2017-18-section-148-notices-limitation-invalid.html">Panaji ITAT: Section 148 Notices Beyond Surviving Limitation Quashed Under Rajeev Bansal</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/panaji-itat-quashes-reassessments-ay-2016-17-2017-18-section-148-notices-limitation-invalid.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pune ITAT Deleted On-Money Addition – Banking Payment Cannot Be Treated as Unexplained Cash</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/pune-itat-deletes-rs-11-lakh-money-addition-banked-payment-flat-work-not-unexplained-cash.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/pune-itat-deletes-rs-11-lakh-money-addition-banked-payment-flat-work-not-unexplained-cash.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Vijayakumar Shetty]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2026 05:00:18 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 144B]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 147]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 250]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1067148</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Pune ITAT deleted ₹11 lakh on-money addition, finding the alleged payment was through banking channels for additional flat work and source was explained.<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/pune-itat-deletes-rs-11-lakh-money-addition-banked-payment-flat-work-not-unexplained-cash.html">Pune ITAT Deleted On-Money Addition – Banking Payment Cannot Be Treated as Unexplained Cash</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/pune-itat-deletes-rs-11-lakh-money-addition-banked-payment-flat-work-not-unexplained-cash.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Calcutta HC Upholds Eviction Decree as NCLT/NCLAT Observations Did Not Establish Tenancy</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/calcutta-hc-upholds-eviction-decree-nclt-nclat-observations-not-establish-tenancy.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/calcutta-hc-upholds-eviction-decree-nclt-nclat-observations-not-establish-tenancy.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2026 20:29:42 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high court judgments]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1067367</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Calcutta HC dismisses review against eviction decree, holding NCLT/NCLAT observations did not conclusively establish tenancy rights.<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/calcutta-hc-upholds-eviction-decree-nclt-nclat-observations-not-establish-tenancy.html">Calcutta HC Upholds Eviction Decree as NCLT/NCLAT Observations Did Not Establish Tenancy</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/calcutta-hc-upholds-eviction-decree-nclt-nclat-observations-not-establish-tenancy.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bombay HC Upholds 20 kg Pet Food Classification as Retail Sale under CTH 2309</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/custom-duty/bombay-hc-upholds-20-kg-pet-food-classification-retail-sale-cth-2309.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/custom-duty/bombay-hc-upholds-20-kg-pet-food-classification-retail-sale-cth-2309.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2026 20:28:07 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Custom Duty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high court judgments]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1067354</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Bombay HC dismisses appeal, holding 20 kg pet food bags classifiable as retail packs under CTH 2309 1000 based on packaging and consumer declarations.<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/custom-duty/bombay-hc-upholds-20-kg-pet-food-classification-retail-sale-cth-2309.html">Bombay HC Upholds 20 kg Pet Food Classification as Retail Sale under CTH 2309</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/custom-duty/bombay-hc-upholds-20-kg-pet-food-classification-retail-sale-cth-2309.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>NCLT Dismisses ₹975 Crore Income Tax Claim Filed After 1305-Day Delay</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/nclt-dismisses-rs-975-crore-income-tax-claim-filed-1305-day-delay.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/nclt-dismisses-rs-975-crore-income-tax-claim-filed-1305-day-delay.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2026 20:27:20 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bankruptcy code]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IBC 2016]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NCLT]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1067346</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[ NCLT dismisses ₹975 crore Income Tax claim filed after 1305 days, holding the delay unjustified after CoC approved the Resolution Plan.<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/nclt-dismisses-rs-975-crore-income-tax-claim-filed-1305-day-delay.html">NCLT Dismisses ₹975 Crore Income Tax Claim Filed After 1305-Day Delay</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/nclt-dismisses-rs-975-crore-income-tax-claim-filed-1305-day-delay.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Allahabad HC Quashes GST Demand for Notice Uploaded Under Additional Notices Tab</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/allahabad-hc-quashes-gst-demand-notice-uploaded-additional-notices-tab.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/allahabad-hc-quashes-gst-demand-notice-uploaded-additional-notices-tab.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2026 20:24:41 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Goods and Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goods And Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high court judgments]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1067479</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Allahabad HC quashes GST demand after finding notice and order were uploaded under the Additional Notices and Orders tab, affecting the petitioners awareness.<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/allahabad-hc-quashes-gst-demand-notice-uploaded-additional-notices-tab.html">Allahabad HC Quashes GST Demand for Notice Uploaded Under Additional Notices Tab</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/allahabad-hc-quashes-gst-demand-notice-uploaded-additional-notices-tab.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>ITAT Mumbai Deletes Unexplained Investment Additions for Shops Purchased by Others</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/itat-mumbai-deletes-unexplained-investment-additions-shops-purchased.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/itat-mumbai-deletes-unexplained-investment-additions-shops-purchased.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2026 20:24:03 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 132]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 143(3)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 147]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 148]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 153A]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 153C]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 69]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1067477</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[ITAT Mumbai deletes Section 69 additions for shops bought by others and Rs.18.64 lakh cash addition, citing lack of corroboration and cross-examination.<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/itat-mumbai-deletes-unexplained-investment-additions-shops-purchased.html">ITAT Mumbai Deletes Unexplained Investment Additions for Shops Purchased by Others</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/itat-mumbai-deletes-unexplained-investment-additions-shops-purchased.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>CESTAT Chandigarh Allows Cenvat Credit, Extended Limitation Not Invocable After Audit</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/excise-duty/cestat-chandigarh-cenvat-credit-extended-limitation-not-invocable-audit.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/excise-duty/cestat-chandigarh-cenvat-credit-extended-limitation-not-invocable-audit.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2026 20:16:13 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Excise Duty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CENVAT Credit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cestat judgments]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1067472</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Kansal Nerolac Paints Ltd Vs Commissioner of Central Excise (CESTAT Chandigarh) The CESTAT Chandigarh allowed the appeal filed by Kansal Nerolac Paints Ltd. against the order&#8230;<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/excise-duty/cestat-chandigarh-cenvat-credit-extended-limitation-not-invocable-audit.html">CESTAT Chandigarh Allows Cenvat Credit, Extended Limitation Not Invocable After Audit</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/excise-duty/cestat-chandigarh-cenvat-credit-extended-limitation-not-invocable-audit.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>NCLAT Delhi Dismisses Section 7 Plea as Financial Debt Had Not Become Due</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/nclat-delhi-dismisses-section-7-plea-financial-debt-not-due.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/nclat-delhi-dismisses-section-7-plea-financial-debt-not-due.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2026 20:13:58 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bankruptcy code]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IBC 2016]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NCLAT]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1067458</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[NCLAT dismisses Section 7 IBC appeal, holding Rs.10.46 crore qualified as financial debt but had not become due as full consideration remained unpaid.<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/nclat-delhi-dismisses-section-7-plea-financial-debt-not-due.html">NCLAT Delhi Dismisses Section 7 Plea as Financial Debt Had Not Become Due</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/nclat-delhi-dismisses-section-7-plea-financial-debt-not-due.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>ITAT Chennai Quashes Section 153C Notices as Seized Material Received After 1st April 2021</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/itat-chennai-quashes-section-153c-notices-seized-material-received-1st-april-2021.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/itat-chennai-quashes-section-153c-notices-seized-material-received-1st-april-2021.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2026 20:10:45 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 132]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 153A]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 153C]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1067453</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[ITAT Chennai quashes Section 153C notices issued in 2022, holding the date of handing over seized material was the search initiation date.<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/itat-chennai-quashes-section-153c-notices-seized-material-received-1st-april-2021.html">ITAT Chennai Quashes Section 153C Notices as Seized Material Received After 1st April 2021</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/itat-chennai-quashes-section-153c-notices-seized-material-received-1st-april-2021.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>MP HC Upholds ITAT Order Annuling Assessment and Deleting ₹2.88 Crore Addition</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/mp-hc-upholds-itat-order-annuling-assessment-deleting-rs-2-88-crore-addition.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/mp-hc-upholds-itat-order-annuling-assessment-deleting-rs-2-88-crore-addition.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2026 20:08:47 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high court judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 143(3)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 153A]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 153C]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 260A]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 68]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1067449</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[MP HC dismisses Revenue appeal against ITAT order annulling Section 143(3) assessment, following its earlier decision in Kalyanika Infra Mega Ventures.<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/mp-hc-upholds-itat-order-annuling-assessment-deleting-rs-2-88-crore-addition.html">MP HC Upholds ITAT Order Annuling Assessment and Deleting ₹2.88 Crore Addition</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/mp-hc-upholds-itat-order-annuling-assessment-deleting-rs-2-88-crore-addition.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>ITAT Delhi Quashes Assessment as Section 153C, Not Section 143(3), Was Applicable</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/itat-delhi-quashes-assessment-section-153c-not-section-143-3-applicable.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/itat-delhi-quashes-assessment-section-153c-not-section-143-3-applicable.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2026 20:06:56 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 115BBE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 143(2)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 143(3)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 69]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1067444</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[ITAT Delhi quashes AY 2021-22 assessment under Section 143(3), holding that proceedings against the assessee should have been initiated under Section 153C.<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/itat-delhi-quashes-assessment-section-153c-not-section-143-3-applicable.html">ITAT Delhi Quashes Assessment as Section 153C, Not Section 143(3), Was Applicable</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/itat-delhi-quashes-assessment-section-153c-not-section-143-3-applicable.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>ITAT Chandigarh Deletes ₹13 Crore Addition &amp; Section 271D Penalty for Lack of Evidence</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/itat-chandigarh-deletes-rs-13-crore-addition-section-271d-penalty-lack-evidence.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/itat-chandigarh-deletes-rs-13-crore-addition-section-271d-penalty-lack-evidence.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2026 20:04:23 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 132]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 143(2)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 143(3)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 147]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 148]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 153C]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 269SS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 271D]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1067426</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[ITAT Chandigarh quashes reassessment under Section 148, deletes ₹13 crore addition and Section 271D penalty after finding Section 153C applicable.<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/itat-chandigarh-deletes-rs-13-crore-addition-section-271d-penalty-lack-evidence.html">ITAT Chandigarh Deletes ₹13 Crore Addition &#038; Section 271D Penalty for Lack of Evidence</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/itat-chandigarh-deletes-rs-13-crore-addition-section-271d-penalty-lack-evidence.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Karnataka HC Allows Consolidated GST Show Cause Notices for Multiple Years</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/karnataka-hc-consolidated-gst-show-notices-multiple-years.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/karnataka-hc-consolidated-gst-show-notices-multiple-years.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2026 20:02:52 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Goods and Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goods And Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high court judgments]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1067401</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Karnataka HC allows consolidated GST SCNs for multiple financial years, holding Sections 73/74 impose no statutory bar, while preserving limitation safeguards.<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/karnataka-hc-consolidated-gst-show-notices-multiple-years.html">Karnataka HC Allows Consolidated GST Show Cause Notices for Multiple Years</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/karnataka-hc-consolidated-gst-show-notices-multiple-years.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Karnataka HC Quashes Settlement Commission Order Passed Beyond Statutory Time Limit</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/karnataka-hc-quashes-settlement-commission-order-passed-statutory-time-limit.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/karnataka-hc-quashes-settlement-commission-order-passed-statutory-time-limit.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2026 19:56:37 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high court judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 132]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 143(3)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 153A]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Settlement Commission]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1067394</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Karnataka HC dismisses Revenue appeal, holding Settlement Commissions delayed order beyond Section 245D(4A)(iii) limitation could not be sustained.<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/karnataka-hc-quashes-settlement-commission-order-passed-statutory-time-limit.html">Karnataka HC Quashes Settlement Commission Order Passed Beyond Statutory Time Limit</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/karnataka-hc-quashes-settlement-commission-order-passed-statutory-time-limit.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>P&amp;H HC Allows GST Accused to Travel Abroad, Citing Right to Travel</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/punjab-haryana-hc-gst-accused-travel-citing-travel.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/punjab-haryana-hc-gst-accused-travel-citing-travel.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2026 19:32:53 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Goods and Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goods And Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high court judgments]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1067373</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Punjab and Haryana HC allows GST accused to travel abroad, finding flight-risk apprehension insufficient, subject to surety and return conditions.<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/punjab-haryana-hc-gst-accused-travel-citing-travel.html">P&#038;H HC Allows GST Accused to Travel Abroad, Citing Right to Travel</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/punjab-haryana-hc-gst-accused-travel-citing-travel.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>MSMED Amendment Bill 2026 Passed to Strengthen MSME Framework</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/msmed-amendment-bill-2026-passed-strengthen-msme-framework.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/msmed-amendment-bill-2026-passed-strengthen-msme-framework.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[editor8]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2026 19:32:02 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MSMED Act]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1067485</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[MSMED Amendment Bill 2026 passed by Parliament to strengthen delayed payment mechanisms, TReDS, MSEFCs, Udyam registration and ease of doing business.<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/msmed-amendment-bill-2026-passed-strengthen-msme-framework.html">MSMED Amendment Bill 2026 Passed to Strengthen MSME Framework</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/msmed-amendment-bill-2026-passed-strengthen-msme-framework.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>P&amp;H HC Quashes GST Prosecution Against Director Without Company as Accused</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/hc-quashes-gst-prosecution-against-director-without-company-accused.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/hc-quashes-gst-prosecution-against-director-without-company-accused.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2026 19:22:07 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Goods and Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goods And Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high court judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[input tax credit]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1067382</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Punjab &#038; Haryana HC quashes GST prosecution against director, holding company must be arraigned before vicarious liability under Section 137 arises.<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/hc-quashes-gst-prosecution-against-director-without-company-accused.html">P&#038;H HC Quashes GST Prosecution Against Director Without Company as Accused</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/hc-quashes-gst-prosecution-against-director-without-company-accused.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Limited Liability Guarantees in Bank Loans: Caps, Proportionate Liability &amp; Drafting</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/limited-liability-guarantees-bank-loans-caps-proportionate-liability-drafting.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/limited-liability-guarantees-bank-loans-caps-proportionate-liability-drafting.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ashok Kakkar]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2026 19:17:07 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government Policy]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1067375</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Limited guarantees can cap a guarantors liability by amount, percentage or facility under Sections 128, 146 and 147 of the Contract Act.<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/limited-liability-guarantees-bank-loans-caps-proportionate-liability-drafting.html">Limited Liability Guarantees in Bank Loans: Caps, Proportionate Liability &#038; Drafting</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/limited-liability-guarantees-bank-loans-caps-proportionate-liability-drafting.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Does Insolvency Law’s Clean Slate Doctrine Really Wipe the Tax Record Clean?</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/insolvency-laws-clean-slate-doctrine-wipe-tax-record-clean.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/insolvency-laws-clean-slate-doctrine-wipe-tax-record-clean.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[editor2]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2026 19:06:11 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bankruptcy code]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IBC 2016]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1067379</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Telangana HC allowed tax reassessment after an IBC plan in a fraud case, raising uncertainty over extinguished tax liabilities and resolution certainty.<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/insolvency-laws-clean-slate-doctrine-wipe-tax-record-clean.html">Does Insolvency Law’s Clean Slate Doctrine Really Wipe the Tax Record Clean?</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/insolvency-laws-clean-slate-doctrine-wipe-tax-record-clean.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Small Company Limits Proposed at ₹20 Cr Paid-up Capital &amp; ₹200 Cr Turnover</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/company-law/small-company-limits-proposed-rs-20-cr-paid-capital-rs-200-cr-turnover.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/company-law/small-company-limits-proposed-rs-20-cr-paid-capital-rs-200-cr-turnover.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sushil Kumar Antal]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2026 18:54:44 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Company Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Companies Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Companies Act 2013]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1067361</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Corporate Laws Bill 2026 proposes raising small company limits to ₹20 crore capital and ₹200 crore turnover, while existing exclusions continue.<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/company-law/small-company-limits-proposed-rs-20-cr-paid-capital-rs-200-cr-turnover.html">Small Company Limits Proposed at ₹20 Cr Paid-up Capital &#038; ₹200 Cr Turnover</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/company-law/small-company-limits-proposed-rs-20-cr-paid-capital-rs-200-cr-turnover.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Kerala HC: Bona Fide Mistake Warrants Fresh Opportunity to Condone KVAT Appeal Delay</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/kerala-hc-bona-fide-mistake-warrants-fresh-opportunity-condone-kvat-appeal-delay.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/kerala-hc-bona-fide-mistake-warrants-fresh-opportunity-condone-kvat-appeal-delay.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2026 21:04:45 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Goods and Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high court judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VAT]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1067082</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Kerala HC quashes KVAT appeal rejection and permits delay condonation applications, citing bona fide mistake and allowing the petitioner to pursue appeals.<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/kerala-hc-bona-fide-mistake-warrants-fresh-opportunity-condone-kvat-appeal-delay.html">Kerala HC: Bona Fide Mistake Warrants Fresh Opportunity to Condone KVAT Appeal Delay</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/kerala-hc-bona-fide-mistake-warrants-fresh-opportunity-condone-kvat-appeal-delay.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Kerala HC: Medical PG Stipend vs Salary Dispute Requires Appeal for Section 10(16) Exemption</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/kerala-hc-medical-pg-stipend-salary-dispute-requires-appeal-section-10-16-exemption.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/kerala-hc-medical-pg-stipend-salary-dispute-requires-appeal-section-10-16-exemption.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2026 21:03:59 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high court judgments]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1067244</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Kerala HC declines writ intervention over Section 10(16) exemption, holding stipend-versus-salary classification a factual issue for statutory appeal.<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/kerala-hc-medical-pg-stipend-salary-dispute-requires-appeal-section-10-16-exemption.html">Kerala HC: Medical PG Stipend vs Salary Dispute Requires Appeal for Section 10(16) Exemption</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/kerala-hc-medical-pg-stipend-salary-dispute-requires-appeal-section-10-16-exemption.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Madras HC Dismisses SARFAESI Writ, Directs Borrower to Approach DRT Within 30 Days</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/madras-hc-dismisses-sarfaesi-writ-directs-borrower-approach-drt-30-days.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/madras-hc-dismisses-sarfaesi-writ-directs-borrower-approach-drt-30-days.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2026 21:02:07 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debts recovery tribunal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high court judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SARFAESI Act]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1067249</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Madras HC dismisses writ against private NBFC’s SARFAESI action, directing borrower to approach DRT under Section 17 within 30 days.<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/madras-hc-dismisses-sarfaesi-writ-directs-borrower-approach-drt-30-days.html">Madras HC Dismisses SARFAESI Writ, Directs Borrower to Approach DRT Within 30 Days</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/madras-hc-dismisses-sarfaesi-writ-directs-borrower-approach-drt-30-days.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Madras HC Upheld RBI Ombudsman’s Findings on GST Refund, Bank Charges &amp; NPA</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/rbi/madras-hc-upheld-rbi-ombudsmans-findings-gst-refund-bank-charges-npa.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/rbi/madras-hc-upheld-rbi-ombudsmans-findings-gst-refund-bank-charges-npa.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2026 21:00:58 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Fema / RBI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goods And Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high court judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reserve bank of india]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1067052</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Madras HC dismisses writ as Ombudsman addressed GST refund, bank guarantee charges and NPA classification grievances.<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/rbi/madras-hc-upheld-rbi-ombudsmans-findings-gst-refund-bank-charges-npa.html">Madras HC Upheld RBI Ombudsman’s Findings on GST Refund, Bank Charges &#038; NPA</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/rbi/madras-hc-upheld-rbi-ombudsmans-findings-gst-refund-bank-charges-npa.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Madras HC Permits Advocate Appointment to Examine Income Tax Records in Liquidation</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/madras-hc-permits-advocate-appointment-examine-income-tax-records-liquidation.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/madras-hc-permits-advocate-appointment-examine-income-tax-records-liquidation.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2026 20:59:51 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high court judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Income tax department]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1067066</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Madras HC permits appointment of an income tax advocate to examine records and facilitate settlement of a Rs.6.29 crore IT Department claim.<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/madras-hc-permits-advocate-appointment-examine-income-tax-records-liquidation.html">Madras HC Permits Advocate Appointment to Examine Income Tax Records in Liquidation</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/madras-hc-permits-advocate-appointment-examine-income-tax-records-liquidation.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>TAT Mumbai: DBS Bank’s Guarantee Commission TP Adjustment Cut to 0.46%</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/tat-mumbai-dbs-banks-guarantee-commission-tp-adjustment-cut-0-46-percent.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/tat-mumbai-dbs-banks-guarantee-commission-tp-adjustment-cut-0-46-percent.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2026 20:59:08 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 234B]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1067027</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[ITAT partly allows DBS Bank appeals, restricting guarantee commission adjustment to 0.46%, treating forward-contract gains as capital gains and allowing treaty-rate interest.<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/tat-mumbai-dbs-banks-guarantee-commission-tp-adjustment-cut-0-46-percent.html">TAT Mumbai: DBS Bank’s Guarantee Commission TP Adjustment Cut to 0.46%</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/tat-mumbai-dbs-banks-guarantee-commission-tp-adjustment-cut-0-46-percent.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>ITAT Mumbai: DLP Expense Remanded; Bad Debt &amp; PF/ESI Deductions Allowed</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/itat-mumbai-dlp-expense-remanded-bad-debt-pf-esi-deductions-allowed.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/itat-mumbai-dlp-expense-remanded-bad-debt-pf-esi-deductions-allowed.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2026 20:57:59 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 143(3)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 144B]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1067051</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[ITAT remands ₹1.08 crore DLP expenses for fresh verification, upholds ₹2.19 crore bad debt claim and deletes ₹8.40 lakh PF/ESIC disallowance.<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/itat-mumbai-dlp-expense-remanded-bad-debt-pf-esi-deductions-allowed.html">ITAT Mumbai: DLP Expense Remanded; Bad Debt &#038; PF/ESI Deductions Allowed</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/itat-mumbai-dlp-expense-remanded-bad-debt-pf-esi-deductions-allowed.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Non-Service of Assessment Order No Ground to Bypass Statutory Appeal: Kerala HC</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/non-service-assessment-order-no-ground-bypass-statutory-appeal-kerala-hc.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/non-service-assessment-order-no-ground-bypass-statutory-appeal-kerala-hc.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2026 20:56:59 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high court judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VAT]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1067093</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Kerala HC directs issuance of certified KVAT assessment order copy within one week and keeps recovery proceedings in abeyance for one month.<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/non-service-assessment-order-no-ground-bypass-statutory-appeal-kerala-hc.html">Non-Service of Assessment Order No Ground to Bypass Statutory Appeal: Kerala HC</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/non-service-assessment-order-no-ground-bypass-statutory-appeal-kerala-hc.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Order Affixed at Wrong Premises Cannot Trigger Appeal Limitation: CESTAT Allahabad</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/service-tax/order-affixed-wrong-premises-cannot-trigger-appeal-limitation-cestat-allahabad.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/service-tax/order-affixed-wrong-premises-cannot-trigger-appeal-limitation-cestat-allahabad.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2026 20:54:56 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Service Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cestat judgments]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1067105</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[CESTAT finds GST order was not properly communicated under Section 37C and holds appeal timely, remanding the matter for de-novo proceedings.<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/service-tax/order-affixed-wrong-premises-cannot-trigger-appeal-limitation-cestat-allahabad.html">Order Affixed at Wrong Premises Cannot Trigger Appeal Limitation: CESTAT Allahabad</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/service-tax/order-affixed-wrong-premises-cannot-trigger-appeal-limitation-cestat-allahabad.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Section 6(2)(b) Bar on Parallel GST Proceedings Applied to ITC Dispute: Himachal Pradesh HC</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/section-6-2-bar-parallel-gst-proceedings-applied-itc-dispute-himachal-pradesh-hc.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/section-6-2-bar-parallel-gst-proceedings-applied-itc-dispute-himachal-pradesh-hc.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2026 20:53:49 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Goods and Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goods And Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high court judgments]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1067119</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Himachal Pradesh HC directs fresh consideration of GST ITC claims and asks Central and State authorities to resolve overlapping proceedings.<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/section-6-2-bar-parallel-gst-proceedings-applied-itc-dispute-himachal-pradesh-hc.html">Section 6(2)(b) Bar on Parallel GST Proceedings Applied to ITC Dispute: Himachal Pradesh HC</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/section-6-2-bar-parallel-gst-proceedings-applied-itc-dispute-himachal-pradesh-hc.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Capital Gains Tax Applies Even When Property Sale Proceeds Settle Mortgage Debt: Kerala HC</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/capital-gains-tax-applies-property-sale-proceeds-settle-mortgage-debt-kerala-hc.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/capital-gains-tax-applies-property-sale-proceeds-settle-mortgage-debt-kerala-hc.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2026 20:51:54 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high court judgments]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1067054</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Kerala HC upholds capital gains tax on a distress sale, holding that loan appropriation does not negate capital gain arising from property value appreciation.<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/capital-gains-tax-applies-property-sale-proceeds-settle-mortgage-debt-kerala-hc.html">Capital Gains Tax Applies Even When Property Sale Proceeds Settle Mortgage Debt: Kerala HC</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/capital-gains-tax-applies-property-sale-proceeds-settle-mortgage-debt-kerala-hc.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Kerala HC Upholds GST Registration Despite Fraudulent Amendment Application</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/kerala-hc-upholds-gst-registration-fraudulent-amendment-application.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/kerala-hc-upholds-gst-registration-fraudulent-amendment-application.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2026 20:50:46 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Goods and Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goods And Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST Registration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high court judgments]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1067080</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Kerala HC upholds continuation of GST registration after cancelling fraudulent amendments, holding Section 29 applies to fraud at the registration stage.<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/kerala-hc-upholds-gst-registration-fraudulent-amendment-application.html">Kerala HC Upholds GST Registration Despite Fraudulent Amendment Application</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/kerala-hc-upholds-gst-registration-fraudulent-amendment-application.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>ITAT Raipur: No Change in Facts, School Surplus Cannot Be Separately Assessed</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/itat-raipur-no-change-facts-school-surplus-cannot-separately-assessed.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/itat-raipur-no-change-facts-school-surplus-cannot-separately-assessed.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2026 20:50:13 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 144]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 147]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 250]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 263]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1067078</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[ITAT allows school’s appeal, holding Revenue failed to show changed facts justifying a different tax treatment from the earlier assessment year.<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/itat-raipur-no-change-facts-school-surplus-cannot-separately-assessed.html">ITAT Raipur: No Change in Facts, School Surplus Cannot Be Separately Assessed</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/itat-raipur-no-change-facts-school-surplus-cannot-separately-assessed.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Madras HC: GST Amnesty Claim Remanded Pending Larger Bench Ruling</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/madras-hc-gst-amnesty-claim-remanded-pending-larger-bench-ruling.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/madras-hc-gst-amnesty-claim-remanded-pending-larger-bench-ruling.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2026 20:48:34 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Goods and Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goods And Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high court judgments]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1067088</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[HC remands rejected GST Amnesty Scheme application for fresh consideration after pending Section 128A issues are decided by the Principal Seat.<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/madras-hc-gst-amnesty-claim-remanded-pending-larger-bench-ruling.html">Madras HC: GST Amnesty Claim Remanded Pending Larger Bench Ruling</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/madras-hc-gst-amnesty-claim-remanded-pending-larger-bench-ruling.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nicotine Sulphate Is Vegetable Alkaloid, Not Tobacco Product for Excise Duty: CESTAT Ahmedabad</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/custom-duty/nicotine-sulphate-vegetable-alkaloid-not-tobacco-product-excise-duty-cestat-ahmedabad.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/custom-duty/nicotine-sulphate-vegetable-alkaloid-not-tobacco-product-excise-duty-cestat-ahmedabad.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2026 20:43:12 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Custom Duty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cestat judgments]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1067315</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[CESTAT sets aside Nicotine Sulphate duty, interest and penalty, holding the demand time-barred and classification under CTH 29399900 correct.<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/custom-duty/nicotine-sulphate-vegetable-alkaloid-not-tobacco-product-excise-duty-cestat-ahmedabad.html">Nicotine Sulphate Is Vegetable Alkaloid, Not Tobacco Product for Excise Duty: CESTAT Ahmedabad</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/custom-duty/nicotine-sulphate-vegetable-alkaloid-not-tobacco-product-excise-duty-cestat-ahmedabad.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>₹3.41 Crore Central Excise Demand Against Cipla Set Aside as Time-Barred: CESTAT Kolkata</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/excise-duty/rs-3-41-crore-central-excise-demand-against-cipla-set-time-barred-cestat-kolkata.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/excise-duty/rs-3-41-crore-central-excise-demand-against-cipla-set-time-barred-cestat-kolkata.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2026 20:40:08 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Excise Duty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cestat judgments]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1067010</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[CESTAT Kolkata sets aside ₹3.41 crore excise demand against Cipla, holding the 2016 SCN time-barred as facts were disclosed to the Department.<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/excise-duty/rs-3-41-crore-central-excise-demand-against-cipla-set-time-barred-cestat-kolkata.html">₹3.41 Crore Central Excise Demand Against Cipla Set Aside as Time-Barred: CESTAT Kolkata</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/excise-duty/rs-3-41-crore-central-excise-demand-against-cipla-set-time-barred-cestat-kolkata.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>ITAT Rajkot Remanded Section 68 Addition to Verify Duplicate PAN Transactions</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/itat-rajkot-remanded-section-68-addition-verify-duplicate-pan-transactions.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/itat-rajkot-remanded-section-68-addition-verify-duplicate-pan-transactions.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2026 20:38:08 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 144]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 147]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 148]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 250]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1067286</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[ITAT Rajkot restores cash deposit addition to AO to verify disclosure under correct PAN, duplicate PAN cancellation and transactions under duplicate PAN.<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/itat-rajkot-remanded-section-68-addition-verify-duplicate-pan-transactions.html">ITAT Rajkot Remanded Section 68 Addition to Verify Duplicate PAN Transactions</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/itat-rajkot-remanded-section-68-addition-verify-duplicate-pan-transactions.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>CESTAT Mumbai: Skoda’s Pre-existing Know-how Licence Not Consulting Engineer Service</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/service-tax/cestat-mumbai-skodas-pre-existing-licence-not-consulting-engineer-service.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/service-tax/cestat-mumbai-skodas-pre-existing-licence-not-consulting-engineer-service.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2026 20:35:35 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Service Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cestat judgments]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1067288</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[CESTAT sets aside service tax demand, holding technical know-how licence was not Consulting Engineer Service and reverse charge was unavailable before Section 66A.<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/service-tax/cestat-mumbai-skodas-pre-existing-licence-not-consulting-engineer-service.html">CESTAT Mumbai: Skoda’s Pre-existing Know-how Licence Not Consulting Engineer Service</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/service-tax/cestat-mumbai-skodas-pre-existing-licence-not-consulting-engineer-service.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>