<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>SecondCitySaint.com</title>
<description>It's About Me</description>
<link>http://secondcitysaint.com/</link>
<copyright>All material copyright 2004-2008 Mike Maloney</copyright>

 
<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/secondcitysaint" type="application/rss+xml" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com" /><item> 
<title>

<![CDATA[

Sports - Breaking Down the BCS
]]>

</title>

<description>

<![CDATA[

<i>Originally posted on <a target="_blank" href="http://www.sportsoratory.com/?id=379">The Sports Oratory</a></i>
<br>
<br>As November is upon us, the world of college football starts to take shape. Teams have now played a handful of conference games, and we start to get an idea of who will be playing in January, who will be playing in December, and who will be staying home.
<br>
<br>What I would like to do over the next month is take a look at the postseason landscape in the college football world, with some emphasis on the BCS bowls and the possible matchups we may be seeing come January.
<br>
<br><b><u>BCS Top 10 - Week 10</u></b> (Next opponent listed in parentheses)
<br>1. Florida 8-0 (vs. Vanderbilt)
<br>2. Texas 8-0 (vs. Central Florida)
<br>3. Alabama 8-0 (vs. #9 LSU)
<br>4. Iowa 9-0 (vs. Northwestern)
<br>5. Cincinnati 8-0 (vs. Connecticut)
<br>6. TCU 8-0 (@ San Diego State)
<br>7. Boise State 8-0 (@ Louisiana Tech)
<br>8. Oregon 7-1 (@ Stanford)
<br>9. LSU 7-1 (@ #3 Alabama)
<br>10. Georgia Tech 8-1 (vs. Wake Forest)
<br>
<br>Other notable BCS Top 25 Matchups: #11 Penn State vs. #16 Ohio State
<br>
<br><b>ACC</b> - Georgia Tech is in the drivers seat in the ACC-Coastal, with Clemson (5-3) holding top position in the ACC-Atlantic. Both have winnable schedules the rest of the way, which would result in a rematch from week 2 that saw Georgia Tech edge out Clemson 30-27 at home.  This is a tough year for the ACC, which had fairly good results out of conference; unfortunately no team has really taken control during conference play, and as a result 10 of the 12 teams in the conference currently have 3 or more losses.  Regardless of which team ends up winning the ACC, the conference has no national title aspirations, and at this point an at large BCS berth for a second ACC team is looking like a very remote possibility.  Look for the ACC champ to take its place in the Orange Bowl on January 5th, and the other teams will fill out the conferences other bowl obligations (Chick-fil-A, Gator, Champs Sports, Emerald, Meineke, Music City, EagleBank, GMAC).  The conference is far too jumbled right now to predict who will play where, but as of right now none of the 12 teams are bowl ineligible, so it's still possible for the conference to fill its 9 slots.
<br>
<br><b>Big XII</b> - With Alabama on a bye week last weekend, Texas overtook them as the #2 team in the country, and controls its own destiny for a spot in the BCS National Championship game. With a relatively light schedule before the Big XII title game (vs. UCF, @ Baylor, vs. Kansas, @ Texas A&M), it would take a considerable upset for Texas to not finish in the BCS Top 2 at the end of the season.  However, after Texas the conference drops off, with #19 Oklahoma State the only other team with less than 3 losses.  This is another conference that will struggle to get an at large team into the BCS, with Oklahoma State the only team with small chance at making it (Although even then a number of things would have to happen for it to even be a possibility).  The Big XII North is currently headed up by Kansas State (5-4, 3-2) and Nebraska (5-3, 2-2), with the two teams possibly headed for a winner-take-all showdown in the final game before the Big XII Championship.  Right now there are 10 teams in the conference with at least 5 wins, so the conference is likely to fill its bowl slots (Cotton, Holiday, Alamo, Sun, Insight, Independence, Texas).
<br>
<br><b>Big East</b> - Despite Cincinnati's Top 5 BCS ranking, this conference is still very much up for grabs, with none of the top 3 teams (Cincy, Pittsburgh, West Virginia) having played each other yet.  All three teams can still earn a trip to a BCS bowl by winning the remainder of their games.  Right now Cincinnati is the conference's only shot at a chance in the National Championship game, although right now they are on the outside looking in at #5, and would likely need to see some upsets above them to get a shot at the title.  Part of the problem with the top 3 teams not yet having faced each other is that it makes it more difficult for the Big East to send a second team to the BCS as an at large bid.  If Cincinnati wins out, #13 Pittsburgh may fall far enough off the radar that they will not be eligible for an at large bid.  West Virginia has no shot with 2 losses, it's either Big East title or bust for them.  Cincinnati is really the only possible at large team of the bunch, should Pitt or WVU beat them and they finish with 1 loss, they could stay within the Top 14 at the end of the season and remain eligible for an at large spot.  Other teams in the conference with 6 wins are South Florida and Rutgers, both probably headed to bowl games.  The other three, UConn, Louisville, and Syracuse, will have a tougher time getting to six wins and finding a bowl to play in.
<br>
<br><b>Big Ten</b> - Iowa has defied the odds thus far and remained undefeated at 9-0 and a #4 spot in the BCS rankings, thanks to wins over Arizona, Penn State, and Wisconsin.  They have one more hurdle between them and a conference championship in the form of #16 Ohio State next weekend.  However, like Cincinnati, they too are currently on the outside looking in for a shot at the national title.  It will be difficult for them to jump into the title mix without an unexpected loss from above.  Despite an unblemished mark in conference play, Ohio State and Penn State both have a chance to claim a conference title as well.  At the very least, expect two of these three teams to end up playing in BCS bowls.  With a key matchup this weekend in Ohio State/Penn State, the winner moves into prime position for an at large bid, if not a shot at the Big Ten title.  Other expected bowl eligible teams in the Big Ten will be Wisconsin and Minnesota, with Northwestern, Michigan, Michigan State, and Indiana also trying to reach 6 wins.
<br>
<br><b>Pac 10</b> - After Oregon's crushing win over USC last weekend, they are now in the drivers seat for the conference title and a trip to the Rose Bowl.  At #8 and with 1 loss, Oregon has virtually no shot at reaching the title game, so their fate is most directly tied to a game in a couple weeks against #18 Arizona (5-2, 3-1), with the winner most likely earning a shot to play in Pasadena.  Depending on how things play out, the Pac-10 could earn an at large bid to a BCS game.  The two most likely possibilities would be Oregon, should they lose to Arizona, or USC, should they win out.  USC is currently #12, and would remain eligible for a bid if they were to finish at 10-2.  Arizona would probably drop too far with a loss to Oregon to be considered after that, so they either need to focus on the conference title, or nothing.  Along with those teams, Cal is bowl eligible, with Oregon State and Stanford attempting to become eligible as well.
<br>
<br><b>SEC</b> - Of all the conferences, the SEC has the most going for it at the moment.  Two teams in the Top 3 of the BCS standings (Florida, Alabama), all but assured two teams in the BCS this year, as well as one team in the National Championship barring some sort of catastrophe.  Florida and Alabama are currently on a collision course for the SEC Championship game, with the winner heading onto the National Championship, and the loser heading to the Sugar Bowl to take on an at large team.  The big x-factor that can throw a wrench into this whole mess is #9 LSU.  With a huge game looming against Alabama this weekend, a win by LSU would give them a shot in the SEC Championship game, and a win in that against likely Florida team could result in a spot in the National Championship game, depending on how the polls react.  After those three, South Carolina and Auburn are bowl eligible, and after that there is a huge logjam among Ole Miss, Arkansas, Mississippi State, Kentucky, Tennessee, and Georgia to try and get to 6 wins and postseason play.
<br>
<br><b>The Rest</b> - First up you've got Notre Dame, sitting at 6-2 and #22 in the BCS standings.  Notre Dame will most likely have to win out (and convincingly) to have any kind of shot at a BCS game (vs. Navy, @ #13 Pitt, vs. UConn, @ Stanford).  Then you have #6 TCU, who appears to be the favorite to lock up a BCS spot if they win their final 4 games (@ SDSU, vs. Utah, @ Wyoming, vs. New Mexico).  After TCU is #7 Boise State, the other non-BCS team trying to find its way into a BCS bowl.  If TCU finishes the season undefeated as well, and ranked ahead of Boise, BSU will have to hope for an at-large bid.  Other non-BCS teams include Utah and Houston, however both of those teams would need considerable help from TCU and BSU to be in contention for a BCS bowl.
<br>
<br><b>BCS Projected Matchups</b>
<br>
<br>Let's take a quick look at how the BCS is shaping up as of this week.  A few rules regarding BCS selection to keep in mind:
<br>
<br>-#1 and #2 in the final BCS rankings play for the National Championship, no exceptions.
<br>-BCS Bowls have the following conference champion affiliations:
<br>   Rose (Pac 10 vs. Big 10)
<br>   Sugar (SEC)
<br>   Fiesta (Big XII)
<br>   Orange (ACC)
<br>-If a BCS bowl loses its champion to the National Championship game, they are allowed to select a replacement (The bowl that loses the #1 team selects first, the bowl that loses the #2 team selects second)
<br>-A non-BCS team can auto-qualify for a BCS spot by finishing in the Top 14 of the BCS rankings
<br>-Any teams that are ranked in the Top 14 but do not auto-qualify can be selected as an "at large" team
<br>-Notre Dame can auto-qualify for a BCS spot by finishing in the Top 8
<br>-Remaining bowl selections are made in order of the bowl closest to the National Championship game to the game furthest (by date).  This year, that means the selection order is: Orange (Jan. 5), Fiesta (Jan. 4), Sugar (Jan. 1)
<br>-No more than 2 teams from the same conference may play in a BCS bowl game
<br>
<br>Okay, so based on what we know as of right now, Texas is the most likely team to end up in the National Championship game.  They will most likely face the winner of Florida/Alabama, who are headed towards a game against each other in the SEC Championship.  So, let's say that our National Championship will look like this:
<br>
<br>Texas vs. Winner of Alabama/Florida
<br>
<br>That means the Sugar Bowl and the Fiesta Bowl will be without host teams, so they will select replacement teams first.  Let's assume that the SEC team had the #1 BCS ranking, and therefore gets to select first.  They will select the loser of the Alabama/Florida game, to maintain the SEC status quo for their bowl.  The Fiesta Bowl, however, will probably not have a second Big XII team to fall back on, so they will have to look elsewhere among the other eligible teams.  As of right now, the list of teams would look like this (List of eligible teams will change as the season goes on):
<br>
<br>Cincinnati (Big East)
<br>TCU (AQ)
<br>Boise State
<br>Penn State
<br>USC
<br>Pittsburgh
<br>Utah
<br>
<br>Out of all these teams, I think Penn State shows the most promise; the Big Ten is known for traveling well, and has a good following.  USC makes the most sense location-wise, but there may not be as much interest from the school to play in a non-Rose Bowl game, which could hurt their reputation among the BCS bowls.  So, with our replacements selected, we will now fill out the remaining open slots.  First up is the Orange Bowl, which currently has Georgia Tech as its other team.  This is a tough selection for the Orange Bowl, which has to be hoping that a Miami or a Notre Dame will somehow find their way into eligibility, because Cincinnati/Georgia Tech is not a strong matchup, nor is TCU/Georgia Tech, plus TCU is not a good match as far as location goes.  USC is a very tough matchup from a location standpoint; however I think that the Orange Bowl figures that this gives them the best TV ratings out of the teams available, and hopes that the team will travel, so our Orange Bowl looks like this:
<br>
<br>Georgia Tech vs. USC
<br>
<br>The Fiesta Bowl is next, and they now have to choose between Cincinnati and TCU, as both teams have to be selected to a game, and there are only two slots left (Sorry, I just realized I never mentioned the Rose Bowl, which is Iowa vs. Oregon, given that neither team will play for the National Championship).  Cincinnati was a relative dud in its bowl game with Virginia Tech last year, so I have to think that bowls are wary of selecting them again, particularly a bowl that's all the way in Arizona.  TCU isn't exactly a ratings monster either, but the location makes a lot more sense, and because of that I think the Fiesta Bowl selects TCU setting up:
<br>
<br>Penn State vs. TCU
<br>
<br>And in the Sugar Bowl we have:
<br>
<br>Alabama vs. Cincinnati
<br>
<br>It should be interesting to see how these matchups change if teams are upset, and the order of teams moves around, leading to different title contenders, different bowl openings, as well as potentially new teams becoming eligible, like Ohio State, Miami, Oklahoma State, or Notre Dame.
<br>
<br>That's all for this week, join me next time as we see how the landscape has changed and we see whose fortunes have risen and whose have fallen.  Thanks for reading.
<br><br><br>

]]>

</description>

<link>http://secondcitysaint.com/index.php?id=306</link> 
</item>    

 
<item> 
<title>

<![CDATA[

Personal - Lack of Blogging
]]>

</title>

<description>

<![CDATA[

I have not been blogging lately. so, I thought it would be a great idea to write a post detailing my reasons why.
<br>
<br><b>My brother.</b> Melissa and I invited my little brother down to stay with us over the summer. He was here from the end of June until the first week in August. I enjoyed having him down, he's a good kid. It's funny, he actually reminds me a lot of me, which is a little strange since I'm the oldest sibling, and he's the youngest, almost 12 years younger than me. But we seem to share similar interests (video games, endlessly quoting movies), have a similar sense of humor, and he seems to have that drive for academics that I had in school (he definitely shares my love for procrastination). Looking at photos of us as kids, we probably looked the most alike, too. Kind of funny how that works.
<br>
<br>An unanticipated side effect of him staying with us was that I didn't find myself with a lot of time to myself. Part of that was due to the fact that we live in a one bedroom condo, so there isn't much space to yourself when you're trying to fit three people in there. Another part of it was that the kid was already spending his weekdays by himself, and while I'm sure he enjoyed filling his days with Grand Theft Auto and Mass Effect, I felt like I should try and give him my attention when I got home from work. Don't get me wrong, it was great having him here, it was just the way things worked out.
<br>
<br><b>UFC Undisputed.</b> This game has been such a time waster for me that I still haven't put together my blog post with my thoughts on the game. I have spent many, many hours developing my fighters into world class foes, to the point that it's probably been a little detrimental to some of my other hobbies (writing, poker, etc.)
<br>
<br><b>Busy summer.</b> Yeah, I know, it's quite clich� to sit here and write about how I've just been too busy to write; if you really wan to do something, you make the time. That being said, I am aliitle surprised at how busy I found myself over the summer. It seems like there was always something going on, whether it was trips (wedding in Albuquerque, vacation in D.C.), or people visiting us (Melissa's sister, and her parents), or any other number of things that we had going on.
<br>
<br><b>Twitter.</b> Ah yes, the glorious micro-blogging time waster. I will admit, it can take a little wind out of your sails, just because it's <i>so</i> easy to post something quick to Twitter. Or if you have an idea you want to write about, but just don't know if there's much substance there, hey, why not Tweet about instead? It can be a dangerous medium to your writing habits if you're not careful.
<br>
<br>Well, here you go, my first blog post in quite some time. It was brought to you by the large amount of downtime I'm finding myself with this week due to me being in Warren, NJ for a week long training session for work. Yes, it is as exciting as it sounds.<br><br>

]]>

</description>

<link>http://secondcitysaint.com/index.php?id=305</link> 
</item>    

 
<item> 
<title>

<![CDATA[

Personal - Green Day
]]>

</title>

<description>

<![CDATA[

Melissa and I went to see Green Day on Monday.  I had never seen them before in concert (And actually I haven't been to a concert in a while), and they put on a pretty awesome show.  I'm a pretty big fan of their new album, and they started out with several songs from there before hitting up some of their older stuff.  I think they played pretty much all of their big stuff.  Really, I was just stoked that they played "Brain Stew", which has been my favorite Green Day song for some time.
<br>
<br>They ended up playing a really long set, they started a little before 9 and didn't finish up until 11:15 or so.  Pretty awesome that they stayed out there for so long.
<br>
<br>Anyways, I took some crappy photos on my iPhone, so here's a link to them:
<br>
<br><div align="center"><table style="width:194px;"><tr><td align="center" style="height:194px;background:url(http://picasaweb.google.com/s/c/transparent_album_background.gif) no-repeat left"><a target="_blank" href="http://picasaweb.google.com/m.t.maloney/GreenDay?feat=embedwebsite"><img src="http://lh4.ggpht.com/_N4fRI97Svtc/Sl6TXMnq3eE/AAAAAAAADbE/jdGAJfU2XuY/s160-c/GreenDay.jpg" width="160" height="160" style="margin:1px 0 0 4px;"></a></td></tr><tr><td style="text-align:center;font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:11px"><a target="_blank" href="http://picasaweb.google.com/m.t.maloney/GreenDay?feat=embedwebsite" style="color:#4D4D4D;font-weight:bold;text-decoration:none;">Green Day</a></td></tr></table></div><br><br>

]]>

</description>

<link>http://secondcitysaint.com/index.php?id=304</link> 
</item>    

 
<item> 
<title>

<![CDATA[

Poker - Bloggers crushing the WSOP
]]>

</title>

<description>

<![CDATA[

<a target="_blank" href="http://sprstoner.blogspot.com">Shawn "sprstoner" Glines</a> is currently sitting 2nd with 10 to go at Event #13 ($2,500 NL) at the WSOP with 1.2 million chips.  First prize is a cool $500k.
<br>
<br>Meanwhile, <a target="_blank" href="http://lawchica.blogspot.com">LJ</a> is in Day 1 of Event #17 ($1,000 NL Women's Championship) and has quickly amassed a nice stack of 11k or so.
<br>
<br>GL to both, especially sprstoner, take it down!<br><br>

]]>

</description>

<link>http://secondcitysaint.com/index.php?id=303</link> 
</item>    

 
<item> 
<title>

<![CDATA[

Entertainment - LOST 5.16 and 5.17 Thoughts
]]>

</title>

<description>

<![CDATA[

Five down, one to go.  I've got to admit, I'm still impressed by the writers' ability to constantly be able to throw a huge wrench into the LOST storyline and leave you wondering what the hell is going on.  This week's finale was no exception.
<br>
<br>I want to take a little bit of time to talk about the overlying story that was introduced to us, and then cover everything else with some quick hits.
<br>
<br>First off, we have what appears to be our endgame that the show is building up to.  It's been hidden from us until now, so we were all under the assumption that the "war" that has been referenced by Charles Widmore and others was something between Ben and Widmore.  However, now it seems as though this battle is bigger (and older) than the both of them.  The finale opens up with a flashback, probably the earliest we've seen the island, with Jacob, living his life on the island, and we are introduced to his conflict with an as of yet unnamed person.
<br>
<br><div class="hh">J: I take it you're here because of the ship?
<br>
<br>?: I am.  How did they find the island?
<br>
<br>J: You'll have to ask them when they get here.
<br>
<br>?: I don't have to ask.  You brought them here.  You're trying to prove me wrong, aren't you?
<br>
<br>J: You are wrong.
<br>
<br>?: Am I?  They come, fight, they destroy, they corrupt, it always ends the same.
<br>
<br><b>J: It only ends once.  Anything that happens before that, it's just progress.</b>
<br>
<br>?: Do you have any idea how badly I want to kill you?
<br>
<br>J: Yes.
<br>
<br>?: One of these days, I'm going to find a loophole, my friend.
<br>
<br>J: Well, when you do, I'll be right here.</div>
<br>
<br>That's what the episode opened up with, that gave us the backstory to what the episode ended with, and I believe that will be the foundation for what happens in the final season.  It's all largely mysterious right now, since we don't know who this man is (Although I like the idea of thinking of him as <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ainglkiss.com/bibst/ej.html">Esau</a>, brother to Jacob), what his purpose is (Aside from his desire to kill Jacob), who Jacob really is, what his purpose is, and what any of this has to do with the island.  But, it does appear that all of that is a part of the ultimate story arc, intertwined with everyone on the island.
<br>
<br>We also don't know how the remaining characters on the show play into all of this.  We've seen their involvement in things thus far, but now what is their purpose?  Widmore wanted Locke back on the island.  Jacob wanted Hurley back on the island.  Eloise wanted them all back on the island.  But we don't know why.  We don't know what their role will be, whose side they will be on.
<br>
<br>Ultimately, I think we are set up nicely for the final season.  The show seems ready to head into the final stretch.  What that final stretch is, well, we don't know the whole picture yet.  But at least we can finally see the road that will lead us there.
<br>
<br>Now for some quick hits:
<br>
<br>-So, do we want to assume that the ship Jacob was watching was the Black Rock?  Because that's what I would like to do.  And it certainly looked like the ship Richard was working on in the bottle last week.
<br>
<br>-I really thought Michael Emerson did a fantastic job as Ben this week.  He was completely resigned to doing whatever Locke wanted.  It's a very different look for Ben, having to submit to someone else, and Emerson is pulling it off great.  And even when Locke was talking him into wanting to kill Jacob, you could just see Ben's mood transform as it all processed in his head.  It's one of the few times we've seen Ben's emotions get the best of him.
<br>
<br>-So Richard doesn't age because of Jacob.  Jacob apparently doesn't age because of Jacob.  Locke is alive because of Jacob (At least once, we don't know about the second time).  What are these abilities that Jacob has?
<br>
<br>-I wrote down several times during the episode "WHAT IS IN THE BOX?" in big capital letters.  I've got to admit, I had no idea it was Locke.  None.  I guess from now on any time I see a box and I know there's a mystery object inside of it, I'll just assume it's a dead John Locke.
<br>
<br>-Anyone else think Terry O'Quinn put on some weight?  I don't know what it is, but his man boobs were quite distracting all episode.  Someone get that man a bro.
<br>
<br>-"I lied.  That's what I do."  Kind of makes you feel sorry for Ben a little bit, doesn't it?
<br>
<br>-Ilana is working for Jacob.  Should have seen that coming.  Never even occurred to me.  So that revelation makes you wonder about a lot of things:
<br>
<br>*If Ilana is working for Jacob, then she and her crew were on the flight on purpose, knowing it would get them to the island.
<br>
<br>*You have to wonder who Eloise is working for as well, since she too knew the flight would get them to the island.
<br>
<br>*We don't know, at the end of the day, why the LOST survivors are involved in all of this.
<br>
<br>*Ilana is against Widmore, but legitimately doesn't seem to know who Ben is.  So where does Widmore come into all of this?  Is he aligned with our unnamed friend?
<br>
<br>*Ben said in an earlier episode that he couldn't kill Widmore.  Interesting parallel to the opening scene to the show where the man with no name couldn't kill Jacob.  
<br>
<br>*What was the loophole that he found?  Was it the reenactment of the Oceanic flight aboard Ajira?  Or was it something else?  Maybe just something involving Locke?  Did Widmore know about this loophole, which is why he wanted to help Locke get back to the island?
<br>
<br>*What exactly happened to Locke?  If he's still dead, then how is this other person also walking around as Locke?
<br>
<br>*Is Jacob actually dead?  It seems like kind of a buzzkill for Ilana to go through all of this to come to the island only to just miss and have Jacob get killed.
<br>
<br>What a deep and tangled web they weave.
<br>
<br>-Hey look, it really is Rose & Bernard!  I'm actually totally okay with the show's explanation for where they've been.  They've been at peace with their situation and themselves for a while now, and ultimately, they just want to be together, so I can totally buy the idea of them just living off by themselves somewhere, away from everyone.  I think this was the writers' way of basically closing the book on Rose and Bernard.  I think outside of some confirmation that they are Adam & Eve (Likely, but still not for sure), I don't know that we'll be seeing them again.  Which is fine, I'm just glad they addressed their situation.
<br>
<br>-What lies in the shadow of the statue? <i>Ille qui nos omnes servabit.</i> That's Latin for "He who will protect/save us all."  No, I don't know Latin, I just looked it up on Lostpedia.
<br>
<br>-The lunchbox that Kate tried to steal was the same lunchbox she used as the time capsule that they dug up under the tree in one of her flashbacks.
<br>
<br>-Good choice of death for Phil.  Metal rod to the chest.  I approve.
<br>
<br>-Sad to see Juliet go (Assuming she's dead, of course).  I really liked her relationship with Sawyer, but at the same time, she was never part of the Oceanic crew, so ultimately their destinies probably didn't follow the same path.
<br>
<br>-Not looking good for Sayid, is it?  Him dying wouldn't be too much of a surprise either.  He's been a shell of himself ever since Nadia died, which is too bad, because he was a great character before he got off the island.  We'll see what happens, but it certainly doesn't look like there's much Jack can do about it.
<br>
<br>-Miles line about considering the idea that maybe their plan with the bomb actually causes the incident, and the subsequent blank looks by everyone was priceless.
<br>
<br>-Quite a fight between Jack and Sawyer.  Although I've got to admit, kicking a guy in the balls is very uncool.
<br>
<br>-For the record, I don't think anyone died from the bomb, except for Juliet.  I also believe that the survivors are going to get knocked back into their own time.  I think it's time to close the book on 1977; there's really nothing left for them to do there.  Their job was to set off the bomb, cause the incident, and it's done.  Now, their story must continue elsewhere, and I think the incident will lead them back to the present.
<br>
<br>-My wife actually came up with a really great idea for how next season should start.  They could have everyone back on the Oceanic flight, the flight landing, everyone getting off in Los Angeles, and then you cut to Jack's eye opening in the jungle, and it turns out it was all in his head.  I hope this happens, actually.
<br>
<br>-In keeping with the idea that everyone will wind up back in the present, I believe this is why Richard believes they all died.  He knew they were going to set off the bomb, he knew it went off, and they were never seen again, so I think he inferred that to mean that they all died.
<br>
<br>-We could have seen this whole Locke situation coming.  The writers were giving us hints.  Naming an episode "Dead is Dead", having Ben say that he had no idea what was going on.  Even this week, Richard telling Locke he had never seen someone resurrected from the dead like that, Locke telling Richard that he wanted to kill the passengers from the Ajira flight.  The signs were there that Locke was not Locke.
<br>
<br>-Was Locke ever supposed to actually lead the Others, or was it all just a big paradoxical mistake?  Richard tried to figure out if John was supposed to lead them by visiting him when he was a child, but couldn't find anything special about him.  He did this because Locke told him he was supposed to lead the Others in 1954.  Then, when Locke arrived on the island in 2004, Richard knew him, and subsequently knew he was supposed to be their leader, because that's what Locke told him.  However, Locke had no idea he was supposed to be their leader until Richard told him that in 2004.  And that was how Locke got it into his head that that was true, so when he time flashed back into 1954, he told that to Richard.  It's basically a similar circumstance to the compass that the two of them passed back and forth to each other.
<br>
<br>But perhaps Jacob was the one who ultimately told Richard that Locke was to lead, and Richard wasn't just going off of what Locke said.  Still, makes you wonder if that was all a big mistake, especially considering the consequences.
<br>
<br>-I thought the flashbacks were very mysterious.  We had Jacob show up and prevent Kate from her first run in with the law, then he showed up after Sawyer's parents' funeral, when he was writing his letter to the real Sawyer, then we had him appear at Jin & Sun's wedding, he also appeared after Jack's surgery where he cut his patient's bursa sac (Kind of cool to see that story play out since we heard about it on the very first episode of the show), he was there when Locke was pushed out the window, and actually appeared to revive him, then he distracted Sayid while he was crossing the street, setting up Nadia being hit and killed by a car, and finally he met Hurley when he was released from prison, convincing him to go back to the island, and leaving him with a guitar case.
<br>
<br>So we see Jacob interact with all of our survivors at potentially significant points in their lives, some of his interactions are meaningless, some are not.  But we don't know the intention behind any of these, save for Hurley, where he actually made it clear that he wanted Hurley on the Ajira flight to go back to the island.  Another mystery that we'll have to wait until next year for the answer.
<br>
<br>Well, I'm sure I didn't cover everything, I know for sure I didn't discuss everything from 1977, but that was mostly because at the end of the day, everything there played out the way it was supposed to, with the incident going off as planned, and the writers leaving us with a huge cliff hanger, which had to be expected.  I thought we might get a few seconds of post-bomb detonation to tease us with what the consequences were, but either way I knew that the incident would be the very end of the show.  Either way, I put my emphasis on the present, and Jacob, and our new storyline, since that's going to be the primary focus of the show going forward.
<br>
<br>Now we get to enjoy the 8-month break (ugh), and then come back next year for the sixth and final season.  I plan on spending some time finishing re-watching season 3, which I will continue writing about on here, and perhaps try and get into re-watching season 4, since I haven't even looked at any of the DVDs yet and I've had them for a month or two now.  Thanks to everyone who's been reading this year, I really do this because I love LOST and this is a nice outlet for me to discuss and theorize about the show, but I am glad to have my readers, since it helps stimulate further conversation about the show.
<br>
<br>I suppose other than my LOST DVD posts, I'll get back to some semi-regular blogging about other subjects, so all of you can look forward to not reading that for the next eight months.<br><br>

]]>

</description>

<link>http://secondcitysaint.com/index.php?id=302</link> 
</item>    

 
<item> 
<title>

<![CDATA[

Entertainment - LOST 5.15 Thoughts
]]>

</title>

<description>

<![CDATA[

<div class="hh"><i>"I remember meeting them very clearly, because...I watched them all die."</i></div>-Richard Alpert
<br>
<br><div class="hh"<i>"If we can do what Faraday said, our plane never crashes, Flight 815 lands in Los Angeles.  And everyone we lost since we got here, they'd all be alive."
<br>
<br>"And what about us? We just, go on living our life because we've never met?"
<br>
<br>"All that misery that we've been through...we'd just wipe it clean.  Never happened"
<br>
<br>"It was not all misery."
<br>
<br>"Enough of it was."</i></div>-Jack & Kate
<br>
<br>So the battle of free will vs. fate and destiny continues.  Actually, I'm not sure if I can phrase it that way, since Jack believes it is his destiny to exercise free will and change the past, which almost seems like a contradictory stance to take.
<br>
<br>Jack is consumed with the idea of fixing past mistakes.  This has been an essential part of his character since basically the first time we met him.  He is so consumed by it that it has shown to be, at times, one of his greatest flaws.  And here is another situation, where Jack can't let go of the idea that life should be tampered with to the point of erasing the last three years of history on the island (Really it's more like 30 since making changes now would effect the entire history of the island from that point on, not just starting in 2004), so that he can save the lives of the people that have died since the plane crashed.
<br>
<br>He doesn't know if this alternate future is any better than the way things played out, but that's because he doesn't really care.  Jack doesn't think that way; he is only concerned with fixing what he is capable of fixing.  In this case, he believe he can "fix" the future, which ultimately to him means preventing people from dying.  But is that the correct course of action?  We can go back to the cliche idea when discussing time travel, if you could go back in time and kill Hitler, should you?  Because that action would have unpredictable and possibly irreparable changes on the future.  Yes, you would be trying to rid the world of a genocidal maniac, but at what cost?  How would that affect the rest of history?  It's the same situation here.  Jack wants to prevent the people that have died since the show started.  But what does that mean for everything else?
<br>
<br>-If Jack prevents the incident, what if that leads to Dharma bringing back all the women and children?  What if that means when Dharma is "purged", all of those women and children who were off the island end up dead with everyone else.
<br>
<br>-Kate would spend the rest of her life in prison.
<br>
<br>-Sun would leave Jin in LA, and they would never rekindle their relationship.
<br>
<br>-Rose would die of cancer.
<br>
<br>-John Locke would spend the rest of his life in a wheelchair in a meaningless job.
<br>
<br>-Sawyer would spend the rest of his life incomplete, unable to find the man who killed his parents.
<br>
<br>-Juliet would continue to be a prisoner on the island.
<br>
<br>And really, these issues are just scratching the surface of the problem, there could be much, much more severe consequences from preventing the incident that we can't even imagine.
<br>
<br>Now, all that being said, we still don't even know if it's possible to stop anything.  And considering all we have to go on is Faraday saying it's possible, and he then proceeded to fall in line with the rest of history by being shot and killed by his mother, how much credibility does he have at the moment?
<br>
<br>I think it's much more likely that Jack helps create the incident, when in fact his inaction would have prevented it to begin with.  He actually reminds me a lot of Locke at the end of Season 2.  Locke became so convinced, based on information that he was exposed to (and consequently arrived at the wrong conclusions), that he completely destroyed the computer in the hatch that let you input the numbers, and only after it was too late did he realize his mistake.  I see Jack heading down a similar path, only now Desmond isn't here to save him.
<br>
<br>Some quick hits:
<br>
<br>-Richard said he watched them all die.  I think they kept that vague on purpose.  Sun only has a picture of Jack, Kate, and Hurley.  She mentioned Jin, but that was it.  And no one even brought up Sawyer, Juliet, Sayid, or Miles.  So which of these people is Richard talking about?  And does he even know for sure that anyone died?  Let's say they disappeared, and went back to their own time, but Richard didn't know it, and just thought they died, instead.  It was a chilling statement for him to make, but it was made out to be very unclear, so for now I'm not taking it to mean much of anything.
<br>
<br>-After Eloise got done talking to Jack and Kate in her tent, she went out and had a conversation with Charles. Did anyone else see him place his hand on her stomach?  It could have just been an affectionate gesture, but it almost seemed to me like it was something you would do when someone when they were pregnant.  Plus, he mentioned something about her going to the bomb in her 'condition'.
<br>
<br>-I thought it was interesting that Richard didn't know why Locke had disappeared.  For someone that has been on the island for so long, I would have expected him to be aware of something like that.  Although, Locke in general seems to throw Richard off a little bit.
<br>
<br>-So the Others went back to their old tents/huts after Ben and Locke left.  I take that to mean that moving into the Dharma barracks was Ben's idea, and perhaps not one shared by Richard?
<br>
<br>-Seems like we learned a couple of things about Dharma: First, that Horace is kind of a wuss, and that Radzinsky is higher up on the food chain than I first thought.  It's still Horace's show, but clearly Radzinsky is in a high enough position to take charge if he wants.  Dr. Chang seems to be the lead scientist on the island, but I don't know how much real power he actually has.
<br>
<br>-Phil is so screwed.  I'm looking forward to his death.
<br>
<br>-Great dialogue with Hurley and Chang.  I also really liked the scene later where Miles realized why his father sent him and his mother off the island.
<br>
<br>-This whole Richard/Locke/Ben triangle has provided us with a cool little dynamic.  Locke is trying to fit into his new role as leader of the Others, Richard is doing his best to accommodate Locke, but seems a little perplexed by some of Locke's requests, and Ben is the old boss, just sort of sitting back and mocking Locke at any chance he gets.  There are clearly things that Ben and Richard know about that they haven't shared with Locke, which might not be a good idea, since this seems to be a much more educated Locke than what we saw three years ago.
<br>
<br>-I listened to a podcast this morning which had a great theory...whatever map Sawyer was drawing is the basis for the map Radzinsky created on the blast door in the Swan.  Fantastic idea, I hope it's true.
<br>
<br>-We went through this period of time where we knew people weren't going to die.  At the end of season 3, we saw Kate, and Jack, and eventually the rest of the 6 off the island, in the future.  So we knew they weren't going to die.  Then, we saw Jack, and Kate, and Hurley back on the island, so we knew they weren't going to die.  But now, like Faraday said, any one of them can die.  And I think the LOST writers know that we've moved back into this phase of uncertainty, so they can go back to teasing major character deaths, just like they did with Kate, making us think she got shot.  Well played, writers.
<br>
<br>-How do you get a 200-ton hydrogen bomb out of a tunnel?
<br>
<br>-How awesome was the touching scene with Sawyer and Juliet on the sub, and then the subsequent ruining of said touching scene by Kate showing up.  The awkwardness factor was through the roof, and Juliet looked like she wanted to take a gun to Kate's head and just put an end to it.
<br>
<br>-Sayid brings up a good point.  Jack seems to implicitly trust 1977 Eloise, and that is due in large part to him trusting 2007 Eloise.  But wouldn't 2007 Eloise know that Jack trusted 1977 Eloise and use that to her advantage to get him to go back to the island?  It's a bit circular, but needless to say I'm not so sure Jack is correct in placing all of his faith with this woman.
<br>
<br>-Can Locke kill Jacob?  Is Jacob even alive?  Is he even a person?  I hope he's thought this out a little bit.  Ben seemed pretty floored by the idea as well.  Will Richard allow it?  Is there anything he can do to stop it?  What about the smoke monster, does he have a role in any of this?
<br>
<br>-Did anyone else miss the "We're going out on an adventure in the jungle" music?  I know I did.  I don't think we've heard it since the Oceanic survivors made the trek to the radio tower at the end of season 4.
<br>
<br>Should be a heck of a finale.  Jack's got a hydrogen bomb, Locke is trying to kill the "ruler" of the island, Kate's trying to stop Jack, we get to find out what our Shadow of the Statue people have in that big metal box of theirs.  I'm also expecting someone of significance to die.  Miles is probably the leading candidate at the moment, especially since he was able to reveal to his father that he is, in fact, his son.  Kate might also be appropriate, since Jack is trying to prevent the incident to save everyone, so his actions resulting in her death would work; although I'm not sure the writers want to kill her off with still another season left in the show.<br><br>

]]>

</description>

<link>http://secondcitysaint.com/index.php?id=301</link> 
</item>    

 
<item> 
<title>

<![CDATA[

Entertainment - LOST 5.14 Thoughts
]]>

</title>

<description>

<![CDATA[

Hey look, it's a plot!  I mentioned several weeks ago after The Six arrived back on the island that the show seemed to be lacking in overall purpose.  The main story of the survivors trying to get back to the island was concluded (Not completely, since they ended up in two different time periods, but for the most part).  There wasn't really anything for them to do in 1977 except for the challenge of integrating into society on the island.  And obviously there was some kind of end game that the show was ultimately working towards, but we weren't there yet.  So the drive of the show was a little bit in limbo.  This turned out to not be such a bad thing, as we were given some further exposition regarding the island, as well as its inhabitants.  But still, in the back of my head I've been waiting for the show to find some kind of purpose to work with.  Locke's primary goal in 2007 seems to be reuniting with the other survivors, or at the very least helping Sun find Jin again.  A nice side story, but probably not enough to drive the show.  Now, trying to stop the Incident from happening?  There's a storyline I can get behind.
<br>
<br>It's probably not a long storyline arc, since the season finale will most likely be dealing with the Incident, but even still, it gives the audience something to be engaged in.  Even if we don't believe that anyone can prevent the Incident from happening (and I don't), Faraday had to have left just a little bit of doubt in your minds when talking about themselves as "variables", capable of changing things, didn't he?  Can they actually do anything to stop the Incident?  Or is this all the way things are supposed to play out?  Everything goes on as planned, the Incident happens, Dr. Chang loses his arm, things at Dharma go back to normal, Radzinski operates the Swan, and Ben grows up and wipes the Dharma Initiative out.
<br>
<br>Perhaps the only real variable on the show is what happens to the survivors, although that's only a mystery to us.  The powers that be on the island already know their fate, at least to a certain extent.  But as far as we're concerned, just like Daniel said, any one of them could die.  We don't know who lives, who dies, where everyone will end up, when everyone will end up.  It's all a big mystery thus far.
<br>
<br>Some quick hits:
<br>
<br>-I know this was technically a Faraday-centric episode, but I felt like we learned more about Eloise Hawking than we did about Daniel Faraday.  And we certainly learned quite a lot about her, didn't we?  As screwed up as the whole situation is, how determined does she have to be to raise her child, and push him his whole life into a career in physics, solely because she knows it is ultimately his destiny to go back to the island she grew up on and eventually be shot and killed by her.  That's some heavy stuff to have to hold on to.
<br>
<br>Now, obviously Daniel's destiny was more than to go back in time and get killed by his mother.  We don't know yet entirely what his ultimate purpose; I've speculated that he built the pendulum in the Lamp Post, and who knows what else he was able to accomplish.
<br>
<br>Either way, this goes back to the broad idea of destiny, something that Eloise clearly believes in strongly.  So the question has to be asked: when and why did she develop such a strong conviction to fate, and destiny?  We saw it before with Desmond during his deja vu/flashback/life flashing before his yes/whatever.  And we see it now with Faraday.  She is absolutely committed to this idea that you can't change what happened, and that things must play out the way they're supposed to (Remember the man in the red shoes who she let die during Desmond's deja vu?).  But where did this idea come from?  She must have seen something, or encountered some kind of evidence to sway her towards this idea.
<br>
<br>-I'm about 99.5% sure that Faraday is dead.  And if he's not dead, he's going to die eventually.  Eloise Hawking made it very clear during her flashback that she was very distraught about Daniel going to the island.  She wouldn't have been so distraught if she knew he got shot and then survived.  The only, <i>only</i> reason I would speculate that he might not be dead yet is because last year at a Comic Convention, they showed a video of Dr. Pierre Chang going on about the fate of the island, the Purge, what happens in the future, etc., and Daniel Faraday was the one taping it.  It had to have been filmed after the episode we saw last night, given Dr. Chang's reaction to Faraday's idea regarding time travel.  However...there is no definitive say whether or not that video is supposed to be considered part of the "official" LOST story, or if it was just some fan fiction to get everyone excited at the convention.  But that's it.  That's the only reason I can think of why Faraday would not be dead.
<br>
<br>-Back to Eloise briefly, towards the end of the episode she told Penny that she doesn't know what's going to happen anymore.  Is that because the extent of her knowledge of the future was limited to when The Six went back to the island?  After that, there is no more past/present interactions, so there is nothing more to know?  Or is there more to it than that?
<br>
<br>-Daniel is Widmore's kid, too.  I know it's been speculated on so much that it's not exactly surprising now that he's admitted it, but I was pretty happy about it since I threw that crazy theory out there after the second episode of the season.  So go me.  That makes me 1 for 374 on crazy theories thus far.
<br>
<br>-Did you notice when Faraday was a kid playing the piano that Eloise had one black earring and one white earring?  It's been a while since we've had some good black/white imagery, hasn't it?
<br>
<br>-When Faraday went to the Swan and waited for Chang to show up, he commented "right on time".  What was that about?  How did he know that was going to happen?  I guess he must have just watched the season premiere.  In all seriousness, though, Faraday knew when Chang was going to show up, knew exactly when the Incident was going to happen, knew exactly what happened to Oceanic 815...but he didn't know that he was going to be shot.  How does he find out about this information?
<br>
<br>-All the best scientists have mommy issues?  Sorry, I'll stop now.
<br>
<br>-It was kind of refreshing to see Jack finally have a purpose in his life.  He had pretty much been riding the wave, waiting to see where it would take him, but Daniel's return seems to have inspired him to help change the future (Even if he can't).  He has a purpose now.  Daniel said Eloise was wrong when she told Jack it was his destiny to go back.  Given that Jack is about to meet young Eloise, I think she might not be so wrong after all.
<br>
<br>-Phil sucks.  Always screwing everything up.  I feel bad for Sawyer and Juliet, getting caught in the mess Kate & Jack started.
<br>
<br>-Looks like the bomb isn't buried inside the Swan after all.  The cement was used to contain the massive pocket of energy under the Swan, "like Chernobyl".
<br>
<br>-This was totally one of those weeks where I kept making notes about things, and then they would invalidate the note I just made five minutes later.  After Faraday had lunch with his mother in his flashback, I made a note to go back and watch the first flashback we saw of Daniel, when he was crying watching the crash, to see if it was Theresa in the house with him.  And just like that, we get to see that scene again.  Then I made a note when Widmore came to visit him about going to the island, and I wondered if that's what fixed his mind, and then right away Widmore says the island would heal him.  Finally, when Hawking was trying to get Daniel to go back to the island, I noted how bothered she was by it and questioned if that meant he was going to die.  Well, we know how that one worked out.
<br>
<br>-Oh, and it's now super-official that Charles Widmore planted the fake Oceanic 815.  It had long been speculated, it was even casually stated during the clip show last week, but now we have it coming from the mouth of Charles Widmore himself.  So we can stop hypothesizing that it might have been Ben.
<br>
<br>-Richard didn't really look all that worried that Daniel had a gun pointed at him.  Do you think that's because Richard's just a bad ass and isn't scared of puny scientists with pistols...or because there's no point in threatening to shoot Richard because it wouldn't do anything anyways?
<br>
<br>I have a quasi-prediction/train of thought about something that I wanted to get out there.  Faraday's plan was to blow up the Swan/the energy source with the hydrogen bomb that the Others' were supposed to bury.  Obviously he didn't get around to doing that.  I could see Jack getting behind this idea and trying to make it work himself.  But I don't think he can do it in the past, just because he can't change anything.  But what if they made it back into the present?  The bomb should still be there.  The hatch won't be, but that doesn't matter.  I'm thinking more in terms of the "war" we're still waiting to see.  If that bomb isn't used to destroy the hatch, I could certainly see it playing a significant role in the upcoming battle that we'll (I assume) get to see next season.
<br>
<br>Only two more weeks left.  I'm hoping for some Hurley flashbacks next week (or at the very least during the finale) so we can find out his story on coming back to the island.  Until then, I'm going to go brush up on my Korean and find out what swear word Jin was using when the alarm was going off at the barracks.<br><br>

]]>

</description>

<link>http://secondcitysaint.com/index.php?id=300</link> 
</item>    

 
<item> 
<title>

<![CDATA[

Entertainment - LOST 5.13 Follow Up
]]>

</title>

<description>

<![CDATA[

I have some additional thoughts on last week's episode, and the show in general, so since there's no new episode this week I thought I'd put up a short follow up post.
<br>
<br>-First, I would like to thank Anne for her comment regarding being able to exist on the island with your younger self.  I responded to her question, but I figured I would go ahead and bring it up in here since not everyone reads the comments on here.
<br>
<br>As is the case with man of my theories, this one ultimately turned out to be 100% wrong. Apparently the idea of occupying the same time period as your previous self was not exclusive to when the island was jumping around through time, it also applies in 1977. So that means Daniel was telling the truth when he said Charlotte stopped jumping with them because she died, and that means Miles is able to exist along with his younger self. 
<br>
<br>That also means that the reason Sun didn't travel back was not because she was already on the island as a child. We still don't know why she didn't, but I guess we have one more theory that we can cross off the list.
<br>
<br>Now, one idea I heard on a podcast that has some merit is regarding speculation on what happens if you were to come in contact with your younger self.  As of right now, the only person we know of that exists twice in the same time is Miles.  We also know that Miles has some extraordinary ability to speak with the dead.  I don't know what happens when you come in contact with yourself (I do know that we're not going by Timecop rules where you will simply cease to exist).  I had speculated that Miles' abilities might have something to do with "The Incident", but perhaps him coming into contact with himself had something to do with it as well.
<br>
<br>-Remember when the island was jumping, and Sawyer and Co. was on that boat, being shot at.  I'd say there's a very good chance that Ilana's crew was shooting at them.  We saw the boats in the present, plus the Ajira water bottles, it didn't make sense for Ben, Locke, Sun, or Lapidus to be shooting at them, but Ilana, now that we know she has some other purpose?
<br>
<br>-Daniel has to be the one who built the pendulum in the Lamp Post.  What do we know?  We know that the Lamp Post was built in L.A. by Dharma over a pocket of electromagnetic energy. We know, from Eloise Hawking, that a "very clever fellow" added the pendulum to the station to find when and where the island was.  We also know that after arriving in 1974, Daniel went...somewhere.  After seeing him arrive in the sub at the end of this week's episode, he is apparently a scientist in Dharma, coming to the island from Ann Arbor.  Therefore, it is very easy to assume that he built the pendulum at the Lamp Post, and is the "fellow" Hawking was referring to.
<br>
<br>Obviously we don't know any of this for sure, but I'd say it's pretty likely at this point.
<br>
<br>-So we know that the Others, and the island seem to be wrapped in lots of Egyptian mythology.  Lately I have found myself wondering how much about the island Dharma knew when they decided to set up there.  The fact that Ben's house (and probably Horace's before that?) in the barracks had a secret door leading to a tunnel filled with hieroglyphics, not to mention that the timer in the Swan changed to some hieroglyphics as well when the button isn't pushed, leads us to believe that they knew something of the island's history.  Also, in last week's episode, the chalkboard that Jack was erasing contained some teachings on ancient Egypt:
<br>
<br><img src="http://www.secondcitysaint.com/images/capture/2009-04-21_164837.png">
<br>
<br><img src="http://www.secondcitysaint.com/images/capture/2009-04-21_164913.png">
<br>
<br>-What led to Dharma deciding to set up shop on this island?  Did they find out about the island from the military?  And if so, how did the military find the island, and did they attempt to relocate it once their team and hydrogen bomb went missing?  All questions my friend Justin and I were poring over and I would love answers to.
<br>
<br>A few things that I thought of during the clipshow last night:
<br>
<br>-First, really good clipshow, simply because it was mostly composed of flashforwards and flashbacks, only we got to see them in chronological order for the most part, which was cool.
<br>
<br>-I remembered Kate seeing Claire in Aaron's room, but I didn't remember her telling Kate not to take Aaron back to the island.  I wonder how much of that played a part in her leaving Aaron with Miss Littleton.
<br>
<br>-So these guys that were going after Sayid when he helped Hurley escape from the mental institution, I guess we're to assume that they were part of Ilana's crew?  I guess I had initially assumed they were Widmore's men, but our last Sayid flashback showed us that he had killed everyone that posed a threat to them, so why all of a sudden would Widmore have more people go after Sayid?  Especially since Widmore knew he was in (Costa Rica?) building houses, and let him be while he was down there.  Plus, these guys weren't trying to kill Sayid, they just wanted to capture him.
<br>
<br>That being said, why was one of them waiting outside of Hurley's mental institution?
<br>
<br>There are lots of blurry lines here with who is working with/for who, and what everyone's motivation is right now.
<br>
<br>Everything's set up nicely now for the last three episodes of the season (tear).  I expect there to be some major chaos in the Dharma Initiative, and I'm hoping next week will focus on Daniel so we can learn about how he's been spending his time, as well as learning more about how the island works.<br><br>

]]>

</description>

<link>http://secondcitysaint.com/index.php?id=299</link> 
</item>    

 
<item> 
<title>

<![CDATA[

Entertainment - LOST 5.13 Thoughts
]]>

</title>

<description>

<![CDATA[

This week's post will probably be on the brief side, as I'm in the middle of getting ready to head out of town for a wedding this weekend.
<br>
<br>There were a couple quick ideas that I wanted to discuss that came up during last night's episode.  The first is regarding Ilana and this group in the black van that grabbed Miles during one of his flashbacks.  Whoever these people represent, it's still largely a mystery to all of us, and for the most part we've speculated that they work for Widmore or possibly Ben.  I had heard the idea that they were actually representing a third party, something which I dismissed since I didn't feel like the show had enough time to introduce another faction into the show.  After last night, though...I'm not really sure who these people are.
<br>
<br>It would seem that these people do not work for Charles Widmore, based on their discussion with Miles in the van.  If anything, they oppose Widmore and his cause, as they considered their team "the side that's going to win".  So that leaves us with two options: Either they work for Ben, or they work for someone else that we haven't considered yet.
<br>
<br>Personally, I've never really had the impression that they were working for Ben.  I know Ben is big on secrecy, and scheming, and deception, and all of that, but when he spoke with Ilana on the beach, she didn't seem to know him, and if he did know her and her team, he made no attempt to interject himself.  So for this group to be working for Ben, they would have to be doing so not actually knowing who it is that they are working for.  And on top of that, Ben wants to keep his identity a secret from them (for now, at least).
<br>
<br>So that leaves us with the possibility that there is a third party involved.  There isn't much to speculate about with this option, as we have no idea who it could be or what their purpose is.  I still don't know how likely this option is, because as I said, they have 21 episodes left, with everything they already have left to do, adding a brand new group into the mix seems a little overwhelming.
<br>
<br>One other thing to keep in mind about this group is that whatever their purpose is, they've been at it for a while.  Miles was approached after accepting the job from Naomi.  We learned about Ilana after the Ajira flight landed on the island.  Those two events are over three years apart from each other.  So at the very least, this group has been operating in some capacity during that entire time.  I imagine we'll find out the group's true intentions by the end of the season to set up the stretch run, for now, your guess is as good as mine.
<br>
<br>The other thing I wanted to discuss briefly was our cast members and their relationships with their fathers.  I remember the episode entitled "All Cowboys Have Daddy Issues", which was a Sawyer episode, but thinking about it a little more, every person on this show has some serious daddy issues, don't they?  I mean, let's take a look at the list:
<br>
<br>-Jack: Father drank too much, put too much pressure on his son from a young age, his constant disappointment directed at Jack put a permanent strain on their relationship.  Not to mention he died and is now wandering around the island giving people advice.
<br>
<br>-Kate: Discovered her drunk abusive step-father was her real father, so she blew him up.  That one's pretty obvious.
<br>
<br>-Locke: His real father conned him into donating a kidney, then later pushed him out of a high-rise window, paralyzing him from the waist down.
<br>
<br>-Sawyer: After his father found out his mother was having an affair with a con man, he killed her, then killed himself.
<br>
<br>-Jin: He actually doesn't have real bad daddy issues, although he did pretend his father was dead because he was ashamed that he was only a lowly fisherman.
<br>
<br>-Sun: Her father is a powerful, dangerous business man.  He basically forced her husband into indentured servitude with his company in order for them to get married, where Jin had to partake in...questionable business practices.
<br>
<br>-Hurley: Father abandoned him when he was 10, only showed back up after Hurley won the lottery; although to be fair, they did work out some of their issues.
<br>
<br>-Sayid: We don't know much about Sayid, other than he seemed to disapprove of his older brother.
<br>
<br>-Miles: As was clearly discussed last night, his mother left with him when he was just a baby, so he has no relationship whatsoever with his father.
<br>
<br>-Penny: Her father is Charles Widmore.  That's about all I need to say about that.
<br>
<br>-Ben: Mother died giving birth to him, and his father spent the rest of his life blaming Ben for it, and in general making his life miserable.
<br>
<br>-Faraday: Still speculation, but his father might be Charles Widmore too.  See Penny for that one.
<br>
<br>I don't have any ultimate point to any of that, I just thought it was crazy how screwed up everyone's relationship is with their fathers.
<br>
<br>Some quick hits:
<br>
<br>-I was disappointed that there wasn't more significance to Miles and his demand from Ben for $3.2 million.  Miles was to be paid $1.6 million from Widmore to do his job, and Miles asked for double that from our mystery group to not work for Widmore.  So does that mean Miles thinks that group works for Ben?  Is that a hint to us that maybe they work for Ben?  I'm not so sure since the mystery group had no intention of paying him anything.
<br>
<br>-From now on, any time Miles or Hurley are written into a scene, the other has to be standing next to them.  For the rest of the show.  I'm serious about this, their dialogue is hilarious.
<br>
<br>-This week's episode was called "Some Like it Hoth", so I was waiting to see what the Star Wars reference was that they were going to make.  I love the idea that Hurley wanted to give Lucas the idea for <i>Empire Strikes Back</i>, only with some improvements.  This is what George Lucas does to people; despite how much they may like his movies, he still screws stuff up so that people want to fix what he's done.
<br>
<br>-The numbers on the hatch are just a serial number?  Hmm, so why were they broadcast over the radio tower?
<br>
<br>-For those of you unaware of Miles' previous film work, here he is in the movie <i>Hook</i>:
<br>
<br><div align="center"><img src="http://www.freewebs.com/gionam/rufio.jpg"></div>
<br>
<br>Seriously, what was with that hair?
<br>
<br>-Jack's passiveness is becoming a little unnerving to me.  He's just so complacent and...I don't know, accepting of this idea that he can't change what happens and he's just along for the ride.
<br>
<br>-I'm sure Sawyer's enjoying himself right now.  I guess you can only take a con so far before it becomes too big to handle.  The system is very close to completely breaking down.
<br>
<br>-Everyone was pretty excited when Phil got punched in the face, right?  It couldn't have just been me.
<br>
<br>-I'm pretty sure I saw Rose & Bernard working with the crew at the Swan.  No, really.
<br>
<br>-So it seems pretty clear that the Swan was built specifically because of the electromagnetic anomaly.  That's why Dharma is willing to risk going out into "Others" territory to have it built.
<br>
<br>-I loved Juliet's lame ass attempt to cover up that Ben was gone.
<br>
<br>Roger: Hey, where's my son?  His bed is empty!
<br>
<br>Juliet: Um...yeah, what's up with that?  I went in the other room for ten minutes and then...I just got back right when you walked in and then...I was just about to go tell someone that he was missing, but then you got here and saw he was gone, and...I think someone took him?
<br>
<br>Good one.
<br>
<br>-Nice to see Kate's back to her old ways of screwing stuff up.
<br>
<br>-So when Miles was a kid, was his mother unaware of his abilities?  Did something happen on the island that caused her to leave Dr. Chang?  Did something happen to Miles that she blamed him for?  It's pretty clear to me that Miles' mother left his father, not the other way around.  And it's also pretty clear to me that Miles wasn't just born with this ability to see the dead, especially considering he was born on the island.  No, I think something happened, and that caused him to have this ability, and whatever happened is the reason his mother left.
<br>
<br>Well, 1,500 words.  Yeah, I guess I ended up making this real brief.
<br>
<br>ABC is screwing us with our second (but last!) week off.  So in two weeks hopefully we can get some information about a returning Dr. Faraday, where he's been, why he left, all of that good stuff.  At least that helps explain our first flashback of the season with Dr. Chang and Daniel, clearly it hasn't happened yet, but will be happening soon.  Maybe it will be shown again in the "present" in the season finale, just so that everything can come full circle.  That would be kind of neat.<br><br>

]]>

</description>

<link>http://secondcitysaint.com/index.php?id=298</link> 
</item>    

 
<item> 
<title>

<![CDATA[

Personal - Podcasts
]]>

</title>

<description>

<![CDATA[

(Quick aside, kudos for Amazon for responding quickly to the problem alluded to in my previous post.  I assumed it would be rectified quickly, nice to see that it was)
<br>
<br>I wanted to throw out a quick post about podcasts, something that I have been getting into over the past few months.  Podcasts have been around for quite some time, and I think there were a couple of primary factors that prevented me from getting into them.  First, podcasts, like many things on the internet, are so numerous and cover so many different subjects that it becomes overwhelming to the point that you have no idea what's good and what's crap.  It's kind of like blogs.  The chances of me reading a blog that hasn't either come recommended from someone or is written by someone I know is minute.  Similarly, just because I might be interested in a podcast on a certain subject, doesn't mean that I will just blindly search for one and start listening to the first thing that I find.
<br>
<br>The second factor was fitting in podcast-listening into my schedule.  I'm sure a lot of people have a commute every day that they use to read the paper (If they don't drive), or check e-mail, or listen to music, or possibly listen to podcasts.  I'm fortunate enough that my commute consists of a 15-minute walk to work, but at the same time it doesn't leave me with a lot of dead time doing nothing.  I also was't really sure if I would make time to listen to a podcast at home, so that made me a little hesitant.
<br>
<br>The thing that ultimately pushed me in favor of listening to podcasts was <a target="_blank" href="http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/page2/simmons/index">Bill Simmons</a>.  Simmons had been working on this basketball book for quite some time, and because of it, his column output decreased quite a bit to the point where we were lucky if we got something once a week (Aside from his little ESPN The Magazine pieces).  While Simmons is kind of a jackass sometimes, at the end of the day he's easily my favorite sportswriter, so I hated that I had so little of him to read.  Plus, in his columns he was constantly making references to things that happened in the B.S. Report (The name of his podcast).  So ultimately I decided that I would start listening to his podcast.  I subscribed to it in iTunes, and basically I would listen to it in increments on the way to and from work.  I could usually get in about 20 minutes at a time.
<br>
<br>From there I started increasing my podcast listening.  I believe I read a post from <a target="_blank" href="http://wilwheaton.typepad.com/">Wil Wheaton</a> where he shared some of his favorite podcasts.  So I subscribed to <a target="_blank" href="http://www.howstuffworks.com/stuff-you-should-know-podcast.htm">Stuff You Should Know</a> which is the podcast HowStuffWorks.com runs.  I also subscribed to NPR's <a target="_blank" href="http://www.npr.org/rss/podcast/podcast_detail.php?siteId=5183216">Driveway Moments</a> (Although it doesn't seem to get updated very often).  Finally I subscribed to <a target="_blank" href="http://www.tankriot.com/">Tank Riot</a>, mostly because they did a tremendous <a target="_blank" href="http://www.tankriot.com/2009/067/">podcast</a> on Mr. Rogers not too long ago.
<br>
<br>I had these in regular rotation for a little while, when I realized that I'm always looking for new things to learn about LOST, so why not find some podcasts to listen to?  I subscribed to the "official" LOST Podcast, which, while brief, is quite handy because it features bigwigs Carlton Cuse and Damen Lindelof, and they usually have some interesting conversations regarding the goings on in the show.  The other LOST podcast I listen to I discovered on <a target="_blank" href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/">The Huffington Post</a>, and it's a podcast by <a target="_blank" href="http://www.jayandjack.com/">Jay and Jack</a>.  I believe it's the most popular un-official LOST podcast out there, and there are generally some good nuggets of information in each episode.
<br>
<br>That's all I have in my rotation right now, and those usually keep me pretty occupied.  I'm certainly open to more if I find any that are interesting enough, and I have listened to them at home on occasion when I get a little behind.  All in all, though, I'd have to say that I've enjoyed my podcasting experience so far, as there is some good material out there, and it's a convenient medium to utilize for people who are out and about.<br><br>

]]>

</description>

<link>http://secondcitysaint.com/index.php?id=297</link> 
</item>    

 
<item> 
<title>

<![CDATA[

Random - Amazon's big screw up
]]>

</title>

<description>

<![CDATA[

<a target="_blank" href="http://www.publishersweekly.com/article/CA6651080.html">Via Publishers Weekly</a>
<br>
<br><div class="hh">A groundswell of outrage, concern and confusion sprang up over the weekend, largely via Twitter, in response to what authors and others believed was a decision by Amazon to remove "adult" titles from its sales rankings. On Sunday evening, however, an Amazon spokesperson said that a "glitch" had occurred in its sales ranking feature that was in the process of being fixed. The spokesperson added that there was no new policy regarding "adult" titles. As of Monday morning, a number of titles affected by the so-called glitch are still without sales rankings.
<br>
<br>For most of the weekend on Twitter, in conversations with the hash tag "#amazonfail," users were discussing the fact that the e-tailer was removing the sales rankings for books that it deemed featured "adult" content. Many readers, and writers, decried the fact that Amazon appears to be removing the sales ranking for titles that feature gay and lesbian characters and/or themes.
<br>
<br>The director of the Erotic Authors Association, who goes by the pen name Erastes, told PW that many of her members "noticed their titles had been stripped of their sales rankings" on Amazon. One, Mark Probst, contacted a customer service representative at Amazon and wrote about the exchange on his blog. Probst wrote that the Amazon rep responded to his inquiry by saying that "'adult' material" is being excluded from appearing in "some searches and best seller lists" as a "consideration of our entire customer base."
<br>
<br>Whether a glitch or new policy, titles like James Baldwin's Giovanni's Room and Annie Proulx's Brokeback Mountain are among the those that have lost their sales ranking.</div>
<br>
<br>This has caused quite a bit of commotion on the Internet, and if I had to guess I would say Amazon will either be fixing its "glitch" or amending whatever policy they decided to institute some time this week.  When you're an internet-based company, it's probably not a good idea to piss off a large part of your internet-based customer group.<br><br>

]]>

</description>

<link>http://secondcitysaint.com/index.php?id=296</link> 
</item>    

 
<item> 
<title>

<![CDATA[

Entertainment - LOST 5.12 Thoughts
]]>

</title>

<description>

<![CDATA[

It's sad how close we're getting to 5.16 and 5.17, followed by an agonizing seven month wait for the final season.
<br>
<br>My interest was piqued for last night's episode, mostly because it was Ben-centric, and those are pretty hard to screw up.  It ended up being pretty much what I expected, a look into some of the history of the island through Ben's flashbacks.
<br>
<br>Honestly, it felt like this episode was made to lay down some additional exposition to the Linus/Widmore relationship that we will see more of down the road. We were shown scenes from all throughout that relationship, from the very beginning, to where it stands presently.  What once started as a very promising friendship between two "Others", deteriorated over the years into what it is today; a bitter rivalry that knows no bounds (Well, almost no bounds),  that, at the end of the day, seemingly leads back to the island.
<br>
<br>Charles Widmore first meets Ben after Richard brings him to their camp (Great casting for the younger Widmore, by the way, the facial similarities were impressive), who is clearly sympathetic to Ben's plight to joint the Others.  Some time down the road, maybe twelve or thirteen years, we see a grownup Ben with a juvenile Ethan Rom, taking Alex from Rousseau, which goes against Charles' apparent wishes to have them both killed.  From this point on, Ben seemingly raises Alex as his own.  A few years after that (Five?  Six?), Charles Widmore is removed from the island, apparently at Ben's discretion (Or perhaps the island's discretion).  To the best of our knowledge, this is the last time that we have ever seen Widmore step foot on the island, although it appears he has spent those following years either trying to get back there, or at the very least find Benjamin Linus.  Along the way we have had Widmore's men kill Ben's daughter, something Ben later tried to reciprocate with Widmore's daughter, but was unable to do, along with an off-island confrontation between Ben and Charles (A scene which I am really itching to re-watch right about now).
<br>
<br>And that more or less brings us up to speed on where Ben and Charles currently stand.  There appears to be some other parties getting involved, which I believe will play a key part in Widmore's "war", but I'll discuss that later.
<br>
<br>The "present" storyline for the episode re-introduced us to the idea of the smoke monster "judging" people, something we have not seen it do since Eko was judged for his sins and ultimately killed by the smoke monster.  With Ben it's always hard to know what the truth is and what's a lie, but I do believe that he went to face the music for Alex being killed.  I think he probably knew that he had to for whatever reason since he was returning to the island, but I don't think that he solely went back just to be judged.  There's always an ulterior motive when it comes to Ben.  However, I can't help but wonder if Ben will have to stow away his ulterior motives for now since the smoke monster made it abundantly clear that it would kill Ben if he didn't do exactly what Locke told him.
<br>
<br>I thought that was an interesting scene, that might help explain Locke's presence on the island.  He came back to life when they landed on the island, and seemed to be filled with certain knowledge of the island (ie. Where the smoke monster was) that he didn't have before, and yet, we really don't know <i>why</i> any of this is so.  I think there are lots of unanswered questions regarding Locke, the smoke monster, Christian, and Jacob.
<br>
<br>-Who is Jacob?  What is his purpose?
<br>-What is the smoke monster?  Where did it come from?  Does Jacob control it?  Is Jacob the smoke monster?  Does it have the ability to control people?
<br>-Was Christian brought back to life on the island?  What is his role in everything?  Is he controlled by someone(thing), or is he simply acting as a guide or messenger for someone?
<br>-Is Locke really alive now?  Is he now occupying a similar role to Christian?  Did Jacob, or the island, bring him back to life and give him his knowledge so that he too may act as a guide or messenger?  Is that why the smoke monster instructed Ben to do what Locke says?
<br>
<br>That's a lot to think about, but when it's all said and done, there will be some kind of explanation on the relationship between these four entities (and, I assume, insight as to how Claire fits into all of this).
<br>
<br>Those were the two main themes of the show, here are some other quick hits:
<br>
<br>-I wonder how long it took Ben to master his art of deception?  It's very apparent that when he's a kid he's terrible at it, and even when he was taking Alex from Rousseau he didn't seem like the cold, calculating Ben we've come to expect,  And yet, there he is with the other Ajira passengers, starting up casual conversation, lying his ass off, already trying to turn other people against Locke, and he doesn't even think twice about it.
<br>
<br>-Peace out Cesar, we hardly knew ye.  While I'll agree that the idea of him not realizing his <i>sawed off shotgun</i> is missing is a little ridiculous, you just don't steal a man's gun, especially when that man is Benjamin Linus.
<br>
<br>-So, throw out my whole theory of an altered present, I guess.  It still seems a little fishy to me (We heard the numbers being broadcast when Frank landed the plane, and it sounded a little like Hurley, everything seems a little too disheveled for a place that's only been abandoned for three years), but for now I'll play along and just assume that they're in regular old 2007 like they should be.
<br>
<br>-I still want to know where the rest of the Others are, and why they never returned to Dharmaville.  Maybe Locke knows.  Maybe he knows where Rose and Bernard are, too.
<br>
<br>-I find it interesting that Widmore was basically removed from the island, and yet hasn't been able to return to it.  Ben said that he had left the island many times, so clearly he knows how to find it.  Did Ben move the island so that Widmore couldn't find it again?  I'm sure there's more to that story.
<br>
<br>-Well, we know that Eloise Hawking isn't Penny's mother.  Apparently Widmore likes to escape the pressures of daily life by running off to England to have illegitimate children.  I still think Widmore is Daniel Faraday's father, however.  I was a little disappointed that we didn't get to see Hawking at all during the flashbacks.  I guess that will have to wait for another episode.
<br>
<br>-Speaking of Penny, I got the feeling once the show was trying to tease the crap out of Ben killing Penny that he didn't actually end up doing it.  Usually when LOST really builds up to something so much that you expect to happen, it doesn't actually happen.  So the more and more they teased it, the less likely it was to happen.  It is always nice to see the human side of Ben, though.  And it certainly makes sense that Ben would have some mommy/child abandonment issues.  His mother died in childbirth with him, and his father was always quick to remind Ben about that.  Plus, he stole a child from its mother and raised it as its own, something he no doubt feels even more guilty about now that Alex is dead.  So once he saw Penny's child, all that kind of kicked in and made him hesitate.  Although I do wonder how long that hesitation would have lasted if Desmond hadn't stopped him.  Oh, and nice ass kicking by Desmond, I wouldn't want to get in a fight with him.
<br>
<br>-Hey look, it's a big metal box that was apparently in the airplane.  And it seems to belong to Ilana, who is all of a sudden very hostile to everyone. Hmm...Ilana, who is supposedly working for "the family" of a man Sayid killed, and now only seems to be fixated on her large metal box, and asking stupid questions like "What lies in the shadow of the statue?"  It's starting to look a little more like she was supposed to be on that flight, perhaps another person on the employ of Mr. Charles Widmore?  I don't know what's in the box, but whatever it is, it's probably not good.
<br>
<br>-Oh yeah, I forgot, what the hell was with Ben draining that pool of water, and then talking into the whole that he would be outside?  That's how he summons the smoke monster?  I don't understand that at all.  I was mostly just amused at how completely bizarre it was.
<br>
<br>That's all I've got for this week.  Next week looks to be another intriguing episode, as it seems like we will be dealing with Miles and some further flashbacks into his life, along with some kind of interaction with Dr. Chang (!), so that should be fun.
<br>
<br>Did anyone watch The Unusuals last night?  I didn't, but it seems like Harold Perrineau's character revolved around the number 42.  Poor bastard, can't ever seem to get away from the damn numbers.
<br>
<br><br><br>

]]>

</description>

<link>http://secondcitysaint.com/index.php?id=295</link> 
</item>    

 
<item> 
<title>

<![CDATA[

Entertainment - LOST Season 3 Revisited (Part 1)
]]>

</title>

<description>

<![CDATA[

I decided to spend all day today re-watching Season 3 of LOST.  It was a relatively quiet day in the sports world, so I wasn't going to be missing much.  I only ended up getting through the first eight episodes today, since I didn't get to start until around 1:00 or so, and I was getting the itch to watch the Braves/Phillies game (See, damn sports getting in the way!).  So anyways, two discs down, four to go.  I slacked off on my Season 2 revisited posts, so I will be a little more adamant about getting through all of Season 3.
<br>
<br>(On a side note, it's a real testament to how much I love this show that I was able to sit down for six straight hours and <i>re-watch</i> 8 old episodes from two season ago.)
<br>
<br>I didn't get to much of the juicy stuff that I was looking forward to seeing in Season 3 (Learning a lot more about Dharma, the Others, things like that), although Episode 3.8 was the great Desmond episode that, looking back, was one of the more integral episodes of the show.
<br>
<br>The first thing I wanted to talk about was Eko.  I remember at the time that most of us were pretty upset about Eko getting killed off seemingly suddently, considering what an awesome character he was.  Looking back, however, I can't help but think that his death was wholly appropriate.  I guess because of how imposing someone like Eko was, everyone wanted him to be "major player" in the grand scheme of things, but at the end of the day, I just don't see it.
<br>
<br>Eko's primary purpose when we first met him in Season 2 was that of an enforcer for everyone in the tail section.  Then, when he rejoined the rest of the survivors, he became sort of a foil for Locke.  In the Man of Faith/Man of Science debate, he was definitely a Man of Faith, same as Locke.  He seemed destined to work with Locke on the mysteries of the island; and ultimately, when Locke seemingly lost his faith, Eko was there to bring him back.  And at the end of the day, his death served as a final guide for Locke in his mission to unlock the secrets of the island.
<br>
<br>He did have his own story, his brother Yemi, who died on his behalf, and also crashed on the island, but ultimately that story was pretty wrapped up.  And actually, I think the most interesting thing that Eko did from our perspective is show us a little bit more about what the smoke monster does.  In episode 3.5, Eko was having visions of his brother Yemi on the island.  Yemi was telling Eko that it was his time to be judged.  At the end of the episode, Eko went back to the plane that Yemi had crashed in, only to find Yemi's body gone (Dead bodies disappearing mysteriously and showing up alive on the island later is not exactly a new phenomenon).  He then saw Yemi, who seemingly proceeded to "judge" Eko.  Eko did not seek forgiveness for any of his sins during his life, saying he killed a man to save his brother's life, and that he does not regret doing that, and that he did not get to choose his life, it was chosen for him.  After that, "Yemi" said that Eko was not speaking to his brother, and then the smoke monster appeared and killed Eko.
<br>
<br>The smoke monster is largely still a mystery.  We don't know where it came from, what its purpose is, what its capable of.  We have seen it try and take people before (Locke, the French man from Rousseau's crew), we have seen it kill people before (The Oceanic co-pilot, Eko), it seemingly has the ability to imitate things, as we have been able to distinguish images from within its cloud before.  We did see Ben "unleash" it against Keamy and his crew at the end of Season 4.  This scene with Eko is interesting, however, because the smoke monster seems to be acting as judge (or perhaps, executioner).  So who was Yemi, exactly?  Is the smoke monster capable of transforming into a person?  Does it actually "judge" people, or does Jacob do the judging, and the smoke monster doles out the punishment?  It's actually interesting timing that I happened to watch this episode today, because in a preview for this week's episode, we saw Ben tell Locke that the reason he came back to the island was "to be judged".
<br>
<br>The other big thing to emerge from this group of episodes was Desmond, and his ascension as a significant character.  I was talking to my friend Justin about this earlier, and I noticed that I was never really into the Desmond/Penny relationship before.  I mean, it was nice and all, I didn't hate it or anything, but I didn't think much of it until recently, probably when Penny rescued everyone.  The second time through, however, I find myself much more engaged in everything they do.  It really is a very touching relationship and fascinating story.
<br>
<br>So first we have Desmond turning the key in the Swan, which resulted in several things happening that we still don't fully understand to this day, things we are hoping and expecting to learn about in 1977 with the upcoming construction of the Swan.  The turning of the key resulted in the sky turning purple, it resulted in some kind of explosion/implosion of the hatch, and it also resulted in Desmond temporarily getting knocked back in time a few years and reliving his experiences in England.  As Desmond explains it, his turning the key must have "detonated the electromagnetic anomaly".  Boy, I'd love to know what that electromagnetic anomaly is, that's for sure.
<br>
<br>But back to Desmond experiencing his deja vu.  One of the cool things about this is that it's the first time that time travel is legitimately brought up on the show, something that won't be touched upon again until some time in the middle of the fourth season, with Daniel Faraday, and again with Desmond when his mind starts switching between time periods.  It's also the first time we meet Eloise Hawking, although we know nothing about her at the time, and we don't even see her again for another season and a half, when we see her in 2007 helping Ben get The Six back to the island.  She introduces us to the idea that you can't change things, and if you do try and change them, the universe has a way of course correcting things.  This is all very similar to the ideas that Daniel has shared with the survivors in 1974, regarding the idea that you can't change the past, what happened happened, etc.  I thought this dialogue was interesting:
<br>
<br>Desmond: I'm going to spend the rest of my life with her.
<br>
<br>Hawking: No, you're not.
<br>
<br>At the time you take that to mean that he's not going to propose to Penny, he's going to leave her and go join the Royal Scottish Army, and so on.  But it makes you wonder if there's more to it than that.  Hawking says that Desmond is not supposed to end up with Penny.  So the fact that he did end up with her, in 2004, if that's something that truly can last.  There has been speculation that the reason Ben was all bloodied and battered before getting on the Ajira flight was because he went to kill Penny; well that certainly sounds like a way for the universe to course correct the fact that Desmond and Penny aren't supposed to be together, doesn't it?
<br>
<br>Here are some other quick hits that I picked up on:
<br>
<br>-There are a lot of old people in Juliet's book club.  I've been noticing that in the 1970s the Dharma Initiative doesn't have a lot of old people, and the Others in the 1950s didn't really have many old people either. I really have no theories on what any of that means, I've just been noticing myself paying attention to what groups of people at what times in history have old people among them.
<br>
<br>-It's probably nothing, but in 2004, when Desmond is late getting back to the hatch to turn the numbers, there is a big rumbling on the island, which would naturally be indicative of an earthquake.  And yet, when Ben comes out of his house, he immediately starts looking up in the sky.  He couldn't be expecting the plane crash, could he?  Again, like I said, probably nothing, but it was a little odd that his first instinct was to scan the sky.
<br>
<br>-Juliet's first interaction with Sawyer is shocking him in the neck.  Talk about love at first sight.
<br>
<br>-Something I had forgotten was a flashback of Sun as a child (6 years old?) breaking a crystal figurine and blaming it on the maid, knowing she will get fired.  I know there is the idea that she was once on the island, and this doesn't disprove that, just something to keep in mind.
<br>
<br>-I still love that Kate & Sawyer were working on a runway that wasn't even going to be mentioned again or used for another two seasons.
<br>
<br>-Even though it's a game from over four years ago, the scene where Ben shows Jack the Red Sox winning the World Series is still incredibly surreal and awesome all at once.
<br>
<br>-In Episode 3.3, where Locke's flashbacks involve his time at the community farm, the hitchhiker/undercover sheriff he brings into the group was wearing a Geronimo Jackson shirt, that he said was his dad's.  Nice little nugget of information, since the Geronimo Jackson references seem to be almost exclusively on the island.
<br>
<br>-The other polar bear on the island, in his cave were the skeletons of some Dharma people.  I had forgotten this, just thought it was interesting since I would assume the Dharma people were the ones that brought the polar bears on the island.
<br>
<br>-Saw our first glimpse of Nikkie & Paolo.  I lol'd a bit.  I can't believe the writers thought they were a good idea.
<br>
<br>-I had forgotten how convincing Juliet was as a "bad guy" when she was first introduced.  She's a pretty cool customer all around, actually.  At times she's almost more mysterious than Ben.  It's really tough to get a read on her at times.
<br>
<br>-When Karl was being tortured, one of the images that appeared said "God loved you as He loved Jacob"
<br>
<br>-Juliet's ex-husband getting hit by that bus was right up there with Arzt getting blown up and that reporter whose name escapes me at the moment getting hit by that meteor outside of Hurley's chicken place.  Totally hilarious.
<br>
<br>-I'd love to know why Widmore grew up to be such an enormous tool.  I know he was a bit of a hot head back in the day, and I guess he's probably a little bitter at life after Ben gets him voted off the island, but man, he is straight up brutal to Desmond when he asks for his blessing to marry Penny.
<br>
<br>Alright, that was entirely more than I was planning on writing.  I'll see how long it takes for me to knock out another 8 episodes.  Hopefully not too long.  I'm definitely looking forward to watching Nikki and Paolo get buried alive.<br><br>

]]>

</description>

<link>http://secondcitysaint.com/index.php?id=294</link> 
</item>    

 
<item> 
<title>

<![CDATA[

Entertainment - LOST 5.11 Follow Up
]]>

</title>

<description>

<![CDATA[

Little early for a follow up post, isn't it?
<br>
<br>One thing I forgot to mention was the fact that Eloise Hawking and Charles Widmore are still on the island according to Richard.  I think this means that Charles is running the show, and if I had to guess, I would say that he and Eloise are "together" in whatever sense of the word.
<br>
<br>This also means that there must be a little Daniel running around on the island.  Let's go one step further and think about the idea that you can't be on the island if your younger self is there.  I still maintain that's the real reason Charlotte disappeared, not because she died.  So what if Sawyer's cryptic answer to Jack's question about Daniel being on the island was due to the fact that Dainel was born some time in the past three years, resulting in his older self ceasing to exist?
<br>
<br>What if the baby Dr. Chang had wasn't Miles, but what if he has another baby in the future, and that does end up being Miles.  Perhaps Miles ends up disappearing as well.  Just think about the idea of someone being brought into existence resulting in their future selves ceasing to exist.
<br>
<br>I thought it was a cool idea, it was something my friends at work were throwing around.  But that's not why I wanted to make this follow up post.
<br>
<br>My blogger buddy <a target="_blank" href="http://jgoat.blogspot.com">Mr. Goat</a> has once again outdone himself in his LOST recap this week, doing a fantastic job of discussing time travel and how it relates to the show in general.  I encourage you to go check out his whole post, but I wanted to post the snippet about time travel here, because it's a must read, in my opinion.
<br>
<br><i>"OK, you know what?
<br>
<br>Let's really talk about the time-travel in this show. It actually is the opposite of confusing, and I'm going to prove it to you.
<br>
<br>In fact, let me make a couple statements, and then we'll get to the proof.
<br>
<br>1) This show has always been about time travel, and in fact has been time-traveling since the very first episodes.
<br>
<br>2) If you've been watching, you have been subconsciously understanding all of this time travel / inevitability stuff all along, with zero confusion. I promise.
<br>
<br>Let's unpack it.
<br>
<br>First of all, consider the notion of time travel. Here you are, puttering about in the present, when suddenly -- whoosh! -- you are transported back 10 years, or 20, or five or three months. OK so far? What had been the present for you is now the future. What was the past is now the present. You check it out, see what you see, then -- whoosh! -- you are back to your old "present" day, and the past is past again. Future just became present. The whole thing lasted eight minutes. You are eight minutes older.
<br>
<br>That is what a flashback is.
<br>
<br>Consider a standard, Season 1 - 3 Locke-back. You are watching Locke in "present day" island action, he's helping Charlie find his guitar or something, maybe hunting a boar. Then -- whoosh! -- we are back ten years, and he is continuing his drama in the past with his con-artist maybe-dad, his girlfriend, his crap job, and the rest of it. So there are in effect two Lockes. Past Locke and present-day island Locke. Now, you have no problem with this. This happens all the time in movies and TV and books. It's fine.
<br>
<br>But here's something else you have no problem understanding. Nothing is going to happen to this past Locke that will change present-day island. Locke. In fact, it is exactly the opposite. Anything that you see happen to past Locke, up to and including a possible life-ending injury, will and can only ever result in who and what present-day Locke is. 
<br>
<br>So, Locke can NOT die in the flashback. You know this. Why? Perspective. You've seen the future. Locke's alive in the future. Thus, he cannot die in a flashback, even if he seems to be dead even briefly, QED. What's more, I doubt any of you have had any problems understanding this on a very instinctive level.
<br>
<br>This is exactly the position of our time traveling heroes. They are living a flashback instead of watching it, and that is the only difference. So, what had been the past for them is now the present. Since they haven't seen it before, these events are new to them. However, nothing is going to happen to change what they know the future was like. In fact, it is exactly the opposite. Anything they do, whether by action (Kate, Sayid, Sawyer) or inaction (Jack), will and can only ever result in the future that they've already seen.
<br>
<br>Is it any wonder now that Jack seems resigned to fate? He's grasped this somehow.
<br>
<br>The flashback structure that we've seen since the beginning is simply the illustration of the reality that was coming. Shadows on the walls of the cave, so to speak.
<br>
<br>Now, let's flip it.
<br>
<br>Imagine it is 2014, and Lost has been off the air for a while. Some enterprising young geeks have taken all the footage of the now-wrapped show and re-spliced it in precise chronological order. Now imagine that we are people who've never seen the show, and we watch THAT.
<br>
<br>I don't know what is coming over the next 20 something episodes, but basically it would go like this:
<br>
<br>We'd see some flashes of time jumping Locke/Sawyer/Juliet throughout island history. They'd be desperate, talking about people and places and situations with which we are unfamiliar. Interspersed with this we'd see whatever we are going to see of the origins of Jacob and Richard and the others. In the 50s, you'd see the U.S. Army come and the time travelers would appear again.
<br>
<br>We'd start seeing events from the perspective of a very young John Locke. The first "flashbacks", though we wouldn't think of them as such. We'd see Dharma show up and whatever footage we are going to get of that.
<br>
<br>We'd start seeing strange scenes of characters that we didn't know. A young Korean girl. A little Hispanic boy. Others.
<br>
<br>Then the main action would get going in the late seventies. Some people would arrive. We'd recognize them from the time flashes. Time travelers. Sawyer. Juliet. Miles. Daniel. Jin. They'd have mysterious knowledge of the island inhabitants, and some strange knowledge of what was going on. They'd be waiting, but we wouldn't be sure what for.
<br>
<br>Then, three years later, some more of them would just appear on the island. They'd claim they had been on a plane. They'd seem to think that they had been their before. Their relationships with the other time travelers would seem to be complicated and conflicted but generally friendly. A lot of things would happen (that's the rest of season 5 and perhaps season 6).
<br>
<br>Then we would start seeing events from the perspective of these interlopers. Somewhat younger, strangers to each other, living their own lives . . . but in the mid to late nineties and up to and through 2004. Juliet will wind up getting recruited by the island people . . . who we would realize know her, even though they pretend not to, and even though she does not know them. We'd notice strange coincidences that seem to be drawing these people together, until they all wind up in Australia, and get on a plane from Sydney back to LA . . .
<br>
<br>. . . at which point they crash on an island. They have never seen this island before. They know nothing about it. But the people that were on the island back in the seventies, they remember. And now, you have the perspective of Richard Alpert and Benjamin Linus. Of Ellie Hawking and Charles Widmore. They are the ones who have been watching this story in chronological order.
<br>
<br>And they know that nothing can possibly happen to Jack and Kate and Jin and Sawyer and Locke and Juliet. Because these people haven't gone back in time yet. They will, because they have. They will do the things they are going to do when they get there, because they already did. But until then, it would be impossible for anything to happen to them that would change who they are going to be when they go back to the late seventies. In fact, it is exactly the opposite. Anything the "others" do, whether by action (Ben) or inaction (Richard, at least for a while), will and can only ever result in who and what Jack and Sawyer, etc. will become when they go back to the seventies.
<br>
<br>Now, see the first four seasons of Lost through that prism.
<br>
<br>I love it."</i><br><br>

]]>

</description>

<link>http://secondcitysaint.com/index.php?id=293</link> 
</item>    

 
<item> 
<title>

<![CDATA[

Entertainment - LOST 5.11 Thoughts
]]>

</title>

<description>

<![CDATA[

I know I griped a couple weeks ago about the overall story arc of the show, and how it seemed to have lost its momentum.  I don't think it's completely back up to speed yet, but I do think it's getting there.  Besides, last night's episode I thought was a tremendous character episode that went a long way in making us care about everyone who is seemingly just wandering about in 1977.
<br>
<br>Yes, that's right, I'm actually praising a Kate episode.
<br>
<br>It's no secret that I have had a strong dislike for Kate since...well, since the show started.  One of our first impressions of Kate came to us from the US Marshall that was extraditing her back to the States from Australia.  He told Jack (and all of us) way back then that she was bad news.  It was certainly good advice.  Kate is not a "good" person.  She may do good things, but often times it's for her own self-serving needs.  And there are plenty of bad things she does, too.  Basically, Kate is probably the most selfish person on the show, but it's very easy for people to overlook that because she's quite attractive.  I thought Cassidy did a nice job of calling out Kate on why she kept Aaron; she did it for herself, in typical Kate fashion.
<br>
<br>But here's where things changed.  She not only came to terms with that, but she then resolved to fix what had been done.  She gave Aaron to Claire's mother, which ultimately is where he belongs (Well, he might belong on the island, but you know what I mean), and then Kate told her she was going back to the island to find Claire.  Wow, a surprisingly selfless act from Kate.  But it doesn't stop there.  Once on the island, she goes out of her way, to no benefit of her own (If anything it's quite detrimental to her future on the island) and helps save Benjamin Linus' life, even with knowing who Ben is and what he will do when he grows up.  I was...impressed.  There was no "doing this for me" attitude during the entire episode.  By far, this was the best thing Kate has ever done on this show.  So if this his her new attitude on life, bring it on.
<br>
<br>On the flip side, we have Jack "What's the Hippocratic Oath?" Shepherd.  The man has been ousted from his leadership role, and contrary to what I may have said before, does seem to be enjoying it a little.  But not enough to want to save a 12-year old's life.
<br>
<br>I think it's interesting to look at this situation from both sides.  I do think Jack brought up some interesting points.  They can't change the past, so Ben doesn't die from this, so let the island figure it out. (Hmm, talking about the island like it's an entity, sounds like John Locke to me)  Jack channels his inner Locke a little bit more when he tells Juliet he came back to the island because he was supposed to.  He seems to be taking a very passive approach to everything, possibly becoming more accepting of this idea of fate, and destiny.
<br>
<br>On the other hand, Jack is a doctor, and doctor's do have an oath to help people.  I honestly couldn't care less what Ben grows up to be or to or anything like that, you're a doctor, and he's twelve, he hasn't killed anyone, go help him.  Plus, if you do believe this idea that you can't change what happened, then why refuse to help save his life?  If you know he lives, then why fight it for your own petty reasons?  I just get annoyed by Jack's stubborn selfishness sometimes.  And now he's passive about it, which I think dislike even more.
<br>
<br>Some quick hits about this week's show:
<br>
<br>-I think it's funny that LOST fans (myself included) spend all week debating the mysteries of the previous episode, when it's all going to be explained to us in the first ten minutes of next week's show anyways.  Take Ben, for example.  All everyone has been talking about is if Ben is alive or not, what it means for the future, changing the past, etc.  In the first 30 seconds of this week's episode, we find out Ben is alive.  In the first fifteen minutes, Miles explains to us that you can't change the past, Sayid always shot Ben, and so on.  See?  Easy enough.  But we're all so impatient and want all the answers, so we shall continue to talk and talk, because it's fun like that.
<br>
<br>-Speaking of Miles, his conversation with Hurley was quite hilarious.  I have no doubt that the writers wrote that conversation that way on purpose, just to try and emulate the fans (Which is doubly impressive since they wrote and filmed this months ago).  I hope we get more interaction with the two of them, they have good comedic chemistry together.
<br>
<br>-Kudos to the writers again on their handling of Jack/Juliet/Sawyer/Kate.  That thing had bad soap opera drama written all over it when Jack and Kate got back to the island, and they've really dealt with the whole situation quite well.  Sawyer and Kate have sort of come to terms with their old relationship, while Sawyer has also reaffirmed his relationship with Juliet.  And not that there was ever a relationship there, but Juliet sort of put Jack in his place after the whole Ben incident.
<br>
<br>-I think there are going to be some serious repercussions from Kate & Sawyer taking Ben to the Others.  I mean, ideally it would be great to get this all fixed and sweep it under the rug so that no one's the wiser, but do I honestly think that's going to happen?  Not so much.  Horace is going to be none too thrilled.
<br>
<br>-Aaron is not a good fake sleeper.  Just wanted to mention that.
<br>
<br>-Anyone else think that woman walking with Aaron in the grocery store looked a whole lot like Claire from the back?  Such a tease.
<br>
<br>-Richard is going to fix Ben, but there are some consequences.  He says Ben won't remember any of this, and that he will always be "one of us".  What exactly won't he remember?  Being healed?  Being brought into the jungle?  Being shot?  His whole life?  What does that mean, exactly?  Very vague statement by Richard.
<br>
<br>-I gotta admit, I like the idea of the Oceanic Survivors being the reason Ben is who he is.
<br>
<br>-So Richard took Ben to the Temple.  I'm tired of the mystery of the Temple, GIVE ME ANSWERS!
<br>
<br>-How priceless was the look on Ben's face when he woke up and Locke was just sitting there, grinning at him?  Hell, I bet Locke would even agree it was worth dying to have that moment.
<br>
<br>Short(er) post this week, it looks like.  Next week looks like it could be quite the episode.  Ben episodes are always great because so much of what he does is a mystery, so his flashbacks always help explain a lot, and by the looks of the preview, his flashbacks look to be very all-encompassing.  I've decided this Sunday to sit down and try and watch Season 3 all day, no real reason other than I've already re-watched the first two seasons, and Sunday is a relatively chill day in the world of sports.  Maybe if I find myself picking up on a lot of stuff that I had forgotten I'll jot it down and post it on here.<br><br>

]]>

</description>

<link>http://secondcitysaint.com/index.php?id=292</link> 
</item>    

 
<item> 
<title>

<![CDATA[

Entertainment - LOST 5.10 Thoughts
]]>

</title>

<description>

<![CDATA[

Boy, it's been a while since we've had a good "Holy shit" moment on this show, hasn't it?
<br>
<br>Overall I think I liked the direction of this episode better than last week's.  I don't think we've quite gotten to that point where the next plot point that the story is driving to is clear yet, I do think some of the wheels have started turning.  I believe that Widmore's "war" may be the last big push for this show, and I wonder if that's what we'll spend the rest of the season building towards.  It seems like some seeds may have been planted last night with Sayid, Ben, and Dharma.
<br>
<br><b>The Timeline.</b>  I talked about this a bit in my followup post on Monday, and to be honest, I'm not sure if the events from yesterday's episode did anything to further that theory.  I think from a basic level it appears to give the theory credibility, since Ben was shot, that could easily change his decision to lead the Others, meaning the Others never killed off Dharma, which led us to the abandoned processing center that Frank & Sun where in.  But this show is constantly dealing with the ideas of fate and destiny, in which case, how do we know Ben getting shot isn't all part of the process of him joining the Others?  I still think that building Sun & Frank were in is very suspicious (Not to mention the fact that the numbers were still playing when Frank was calling for help on the plane, something I forgot to bring up, implying that maybe Rousseau never changed the recording), but the jury is still out on whether or not what Sayid did actually changed anything.
<br>
<br><b>Sayid.</b>  It's hard to go wrong when you focus an episode around Sayid.  Sayid is actually the person I would trust most to be my leader if I had been on Oceanic 815, as opposed to Jack, or Locke, or even Sawyer for that matter.  He marches to the beat of his own drum, only his drum beat tends to be better than everyone else's.  It was actually kind of refreshing to have a straight up flashback-filled episode of LOST, I feel like we haven't had one in forever.
<br>
<br>As soon as they showed the "Previously on LOST" clip at the beginning with Sayid killing that guy on the golf course, I knew that was why he was in handcuffs.  And I love the idea that he didn't even want to be on the plane, but ended up there anyways.  It explains the look for surprise (from both Ben & Sayid) when they see each other on the plane.  I'm assuming/hoping that during the rest of the season we will get to see similar flashbacks for Hurley and Kate.
<br>
<br>Some other random thoughts:
<br>
<br>-Like I said, I think some of what we saw had a great purpose to it in terms of the upcoming story arc.  I know the bounty hunter said she was working for the family of the man he killed in Guam, but I can't help but wonder if it was her responsibility to make sure he was on that flight because of Charles Widmore.  Was Sayid being on that plane really fate, or because someone wanted him there?  Sayid is very good at what he does, he would be a valuable asset for anyone who wanted to engage in a battle.
<br>
<br>-"He's Our You" was a great episode title, and I loved how they used it in the show.  I also like the idea that the 1970s Dharma version of Sayid is just some hippy that gives people drugs to make them tell the truth.  Sound about right.  I bet Sawyer is real glad right about now that he made up that LeFleur name for himself, don't you think?
<br>
<br>-I love Juliet's subtlety.  "Well, I'm glad someone else told you about Sawyer and I because I couldn't think of a way to tell you without it sounding like I was telling you to stay away <i>(So I'll just drop it into the subtext here: Stay away)</i>"
<br>
<br>-Phil is a douche.  When I see him all I can think of is him playing Jeremy Piven's assistant in Old School.  Just wanted to get that out there.
<br>
<br>-Before I forget, thanks to my friend Justin for pointing something out from last week's episode (Which I had to rewatch online since there was no Pop Up LOST this week!).  When Sun was following Ben to the canoes, Ben at one point in time pulled off his sling and checked his arm, which seemed to be miraculously healed.  Very interesting turn of events, since the last time Ben was on the island it was very clear that whatever it was that was healing people, wasn't working for Ben, thanks to his tumor and slow post-surgery recovery time.  I have no idea what that means, but it's something to think about.
<br>
<br>-It was very interesting to see Sayid become a man of destiny once he went back on the island and saw Ben.  He's normally the rational one, who does what has to be done, and doesn't put his own interests over others.  And perhaps that's all this Sayid was doing to.  He knows what Ben is, what he's done (or in this case will do), and decided he needed to do something about it.  I had no doubt that he <i>wanted</i> to kill Ben, but I am very surprised that he actually went ahead and did it.
<br>
<br>-So Ben called out Sayid in Santo Domingo and said he was a killer at his core.  Did he say that because he knows Sayid's file, or did he say that because he remembers Sayid putting a bullet into his chest when he was twelve years old?
<br>
<br>-I was originally of the opinion that Sayid killed Ben, but Ben in 2007 would still be alive because any changes to the island's past didn't affect the rest of the world, and since Ben wasn't on the island when Sayid went back in time, he was unaffected by his death as a child.  I think based on what others have said that I'm going to change my mind on that; I really liked that someone mentioned the fact that there is a very accomplished surgeon on the island (And let's face it, the idea of Jack doing life-saving surgery on a twelve year old Ben is awesome on so many levels that it has to happen).  He got shot in the chest, not the head, so while it's not looking good for him, Jin's still there, so it's not like he's going to be laying there for three days before someone finds him.
<br>
<br>However, this still leads back to my question earlier regarding fate.  Was Ben supposed to get shot?  Logically, you'd have to think this would affect his relationship with the Others, him getting shot by "one of them" and all.  But then again, maybe it's supposed to happen that way.  Does a meeting with Richard down the road perhaps clear the air on Sayid's place on the island?  And what exactly is Sayid's place on the island?
<br>
<br>-I'm amused that any time one of the survivors tells anyone else the truth about what really happened to them with the plane crash and the island, people just think they're crazy (Hurley telling his mom, Sayid telling Horace).
<br>
<br>-I think Rose & Bernard are working for Ben and they set up the flaming VW bus as a distraction.  (Note: I may be lying about that, and just wanted to mention Rose & Bernard since they're still completely MIA)
<br>
<br>-Does anyone else want to know the names of the other kids on the island so we can see how many of them we know?
<br>
<br>-Those people that were going after Sayid, after he broke Hurley out of the mental institution, were they all part of the same group of people as the bounty hunter?  If I had to guess I would say they were Widmore's people, and really, what are the odds that a group of Widmore's people would go after Sayid like that, and then all of a sudden this bounty hunter finally shows up working for some family in Guam.  I dunno, I really feel like Widmore was behind all of that.
<br>
<br>I apologize if I missed anything awesome to discuss.  Next week's preview looked particularly vague, and all we know is that the Dharma people aren't happy with all the shenanigans that have been going on in camp.  Hoping for another flashback episode, maybe we can find out what it took for Kate to dump Aaron at the drop of a hat.<br><br>

]]>

</description>

<link>http://secondcitysaint.com/index.php?id=291</link> 
</item>    

 
<item> 
<title>

<![CDATA[

Entertainment - LOST 5.9 Follow-Up
]]>

</title>

<description>

<![CDATA[

<i>Two</i> LOST posts in one week!  What is this world coming two?
<br>
<br>I was listening to a LOST podcast last week, and a couple of ideas were brought up that I found very interesting and wanted to briefly discuss.
<br>
<br>The first is regarding Sun, specifically the fact that she is stuck in the present while Jack, Kate, Hurley and Sayid all went back to 1977.  Someone brought up the idea that the reason Ben didn't go back to 1977 was because he was already on the island in 1977.  So perhaps Sun was already on the island in 1977 as well.  To take it even further, perhaps Sun was the baby with Pierre Chang:
<br>
<br><div align="center"><img width=300 src="http://images4.wikia.nocookie.net/lostpedia/images/9/93/5x01_Pierre'sBaby.jpg"></div>
<br>This certainly isn't a foolproof theory, but it does answer a couple of questions.  First, there has been (and will continue to be) lots of speculation on who the baby is.  I'd say it's safe to assume it's someone we already know, it's not like the LOST writers to just show us a random baby and then never mention it again.  Second, it tells us why Sun didn't go back with everyone else.  There is undoubtedly a reason why, we just don't know what it is.
<br>
<br>Now, what do we also know that seems to counter this theory?  Well, for starters, Locke didn't go back, and he's not on the island in 1977.  However, Locke was also dead, so that may have prevented him from going back.  Also, Frank didn't go back.  Now Frank is an interesting case.  He was never on Oceanic 815, he came to the island on the freighter, so you might think that him being on the freighter precludes him from going back to 1977.  However, Daniel & Miles both ended up back there (Granted they weren't on the Ajira flight, they were already on the island when they flashed back).  Also, I've always felt that Frank being on Ajira 316 was a "course correction" in Frank's life, considering he was supposed to be the pilot for Oceanic 815.
<br>
<br>So, should Frank have gone back?  I think I lean towards yes, since Miles and Daniel went back.  Does this mean Frank was on the island in 1977?  We have seen no evidence that he was, but Frank is also a largely unknown quantity.  Really, outside of the fact that he was a pilot for Oceanic and was supposed to fly flight 815, we know practically nothing about him, including why he was chosen to be on the freighter headed towards the island.  It's certainly possible that he's been there before, and if that's the case, it's probably a good bet Sun was there as well.
<br>
<br>Idea/theory #2 that was thrown out there was regarding the state of the island when Sun and Frank got there.  The dock they arrived on, the Dharma barracks, completely abandoned.  And not just vacant, but it looks like whoever was there up and left and didn't think twice about how things looked when they left.  It seemed a little odd to me that the barracks looked so disheveled, considering the Others were still on the island and it would only make sense for them to go back to living there after everyone left.  So someone suggested that the island that Sun and Frank are on is set in an alternate present than what we saw the last time everyone was on the island in 2004.
<br>
<br>We've leaned on Daniel Faraday to explain the rules on time travel, what can and can't be done, etc., and while he seems to be of the idea that what happened in the past happened, and you can't change it, our knowledge of the rules are fairly vague, so at this point I'm not willing to rule out anything when it comes to the timeline of the island.
<br>
<br>Widmore spoke of a war to Locke.  Could it be that the barracks we saw Sun and Frank in are a result of that war in the past?
<br>
<br>Let's take a look at a couple of screenshots from last week's episode:
<br>
<br>First, the "Processing Center" circa 1977:
<br>
<br><div align="center"><img width="500" src="http://www.secondcitysaint.com/images/capture/2009-03-22_220219.png"></div>
<br><div align="center"><img width="500" src="http://www.secondcitysaint.com/images/capture/2009-03-22_220145.png"></div>
<br>Now, the "Processing Center" circa 2007:
<br>
<br><div align="center"><img width="500" src="http://www.secondcitysaint.com/images/capture/2009-03-22_215933.png"></div>
<br><div align="center"><img width="500" src="http://www.secondcitysaint.com/images/capture/2009-03-22_215909.png"></div>
<br><div align="center"><img width="500" src="http://www.secondcitysaint.com/images/capture/2009-03-22_215859.png"></div>
<br>I know the last three pictures are a little dark, but it would certainly appear that these are the same two buildings, yes?  The doors are the same, the hanging signs appear to be the same, the general layout with the big open floor seems to be the same.  Well, let's take a look at a few screen shots from <i>The Man From Tallahassee</i>, when Kate was captured and put into their rec room:
<br>
<br><div align="center"><img width="500" src="http://www.secondcitysaint.com/images/capture/vlcsnap-00006.png"></div>
<br><div align="center"><img width="500" src="http://www.secondcitysaint.com/images/capture/vlcsnap-00005.png"></div>
<br><div align="center"><img width="500" src="http://www.secondcitysaint.com/images/capture/vlcsnap-00002.png"></div>
<br>Certainly looks like the same building, doesn't it?  Again, the doors and window are the same, the light switches next to the door are the same as in 1977, same open floor layout.  At the very least in real life they used the same building; whether or not it's the same building on the show remains to be seen.
<br>
<br>But if it is the same building?  Then how do you explain it going from looking like the processing center for new recruits in 1977, turned into a rec room with pool table, pinball machine, etc. used by the Others in 2004, turned into an abandoned (and trashed) processing center in 2007?
<br>
<br>Again, this isn't a foolproof theory by any means.  There is still the matter of the runway that Frank landed on, which as far as we know was built by the Others (They had Kate & Sawyer helping out in Season 3).  And it could just be that the rec room the Others had was in a similar looking building within the barracks, and the processing center was just left to rot somewhere else.  It's certainly plausible, since all the houses they have look the same anyways.  But, it's possible.<br><br>

]]>

</description>

<link>http://secondcitysaint.com/index.php?id=290</link> 
</item>    

 
<item> 
<title>

<![CDATA[

Entertainment - LOST 5.9 Thoughts
]]>

</title>

<description>

<![CDATA[

I'm not gonna lie, the week off wasn't as bad as I was expecting.  It was actually a very appropriate time for a break, with everyone back up to speed and all squared away three years from when the Six got off the island, now back on the island.  Perfect time to take the week off, then start moving forward with the next part of our story.
<br>
<br>Slower episode this week, as the primary focus was on integrating the Six back into island society.  We had the story fleshed out a little for us, and I feel like the show is in kind of an interesting spot at the moment.
<br>
<br>The driving force of this season was the Oceanic Six trying to get back to the island, and on the island, Locke was trying to stop the island from moving, and also leave to bring back the Six.  Well, here we are now, with the Six back on the island (albeit in two different times).  So...what now?  Locke is back on the island, so he can lead his people.  Sawyer, Juliet, Miles and Jin have all moved on with their lives as a part of the Dharma Initiative.  Kate, Hurley and Jack have all started to integrate themselves into the Initiative as well.  Sayid is in a bit of a pickle right now, but he too is integrating into the island's society.  Sun and Frank seem to be on a mission to reach everyone else in 1977.
<br>
<br>But where do we go from here?  What's the ultimate point of the show?  I mean, I love that we're learning more about the island's past in 1977, but what is it building to?  Dharma's going to die in the purge, and that would be quite the anticlimactic way for our friends to go, wouldn't it?  Are they ultimately going to try and get back to the present?  Are they going to try and leave the island again?
<br>
<br>It just seems to me that, at this moment, the show has lost (no pun intended) its identity.  That's not to say that everything won't change next week, but when we hit our one week break, the survivors had generally accomplished what they had set out to do, and now seem to be without an ultimate goal, save for Sun and Frank.  I think it's very important for the writers to reveal the next (or last?) chapter in the show, so that it doesn't lose any of its momentum.
<br>
<br>But I'll get off my soap box now.  The writers were kind enough this week to fill us in on what exactly happened on Ajira flight 316.  As we all know, Jack, Hurley, Kate, and Sayid all disappeared off the plane, at seemingly the same time the plane itself and everyone else on it, went from wherever they were in the Pacific, to the island(s).  Frank managed to land the plane on a runway on the secondary island, and then Sun knocked Ben out and went with Frank over to the main island.  Nothing really surprising there, but still it's nice to actually see first hand.
<br>
<br>Meanwhile, in 1977, the every crafty Sawyer devises a plan to sneak Jack, Kate and Hurley into the Dharma Initiative.  Sayid, on the other hand, was wandering around on his own, and was discovered by Dharma and is being treated as a hostile.
<br>
<br>So there's a quick synopsis of what happened, let's talk about some of it in a little more detail:
<br>
<br>-I talked to my friend Justin about this a little bit, but I loved the scene with Lapidus and Cesar right after everyone got off the plane.  Frank was channeling his inner Jack when talking about sticking together, and staying on the beach so that everyone remains safe, while Cesar wanted to go off into the jungle, and check out some buildings he saw off in the distance.  Great parallels to Season One with Oceanic 815.
<br>
<br>-Did you like the runway they landed on?  Convenient that the Others had Kate & Sawyer working on that very same runway three years ago.  It's almost like Ben knew he was going to need one for a plane that was going to try and land on the island down the road...
<br>
<br>-So, it's been three years, and apparently the Others have completely abandoned the Dharma complex?  Why?  Where did they all go?  Did they go back to the Temple?
<br>
<br>-Rose & Bernard?  Anyone?
<br>
<br>-I like the idea of Christian Shepard just hanging out in an abandoned village by himself.  Interesting though, that Sun and Frank can both see him.  So that's Jack, Locke, Claire, Sun, and Frank that have all seen and talked to Christian.  Quite a few people.
<br>
<br>-I wonder what this journey involves.  Does accomplishing this journey mean they'll go back to join everyone else, or will everyone else end up joining them?
<br>
<br>-Back in '77, we see Mr. Radzinsky, the guy who worked in the Swan prior to Desmond arriving and ultimately took a shotgun and blew his head off...or at least that's the story we heard.  Only apparently the Swan didn't exist yet, and it looks like Radzinsky was instrumental in designing it.  In 1977 he worked in the communications facility.  The introduction of this previously talked about character actually opens up a lot of questions.
<br>
<br>Was he the first person to man the Swan?
<br>Why did they want to keep the Swan's location a secret from the Others?
<br>How did Radzinsky survive the purge?  Was he in the Swan at the time?
<br>If he used to work for Dharma, what was his purpose in creating the map of the stations on the blast wall in the Swan?
<br>
<br>-I hope it was Sawyer's idea to make Jack a custodian, because that is quite hilarious.  It would certainly seem like it was, because Hurley's a chef, and Kate appears to be a mechanic, probably so Juliet can keep an eye on her.
<br>
<br>-Speaking of Juliet, I'm significantly less concerned about Kate screwing things up between her and Sawyer now.  Juliet's not stupid, there is no way that she isn't completely aware of what's going on, and I guarantee that she put the smack down on Kate if she tries anything.  At the same time, Sawyer isn't exactly thrilled to see everyone back, Kate included.  So try as she might, I don't think Kate has a chance.
<br>
<br>-My favorite part of the whole episode had to be Sawyer putting Jack in his place.  The whole scene really illustrated the dynamic shift of everything on the island from the last time they were all together.  I've mentioned this before, but I'm really just amazed at how differently Jack, Kate, and Hurley's lives have all progressed over the past three years compared to Sawyer, Juliet, Jin, and Miles.  The first three, they come back to the island, and they seem to be exactly the same, nothing is really different about their lives, despite the fact that they've been off the island for three years and have had a chance to re-integrate with society.  On the other hand, Jack, Juliet, Jin and Miles have all moved on with their lives, and they really seem at peace with what they're doing.  Now that's not to say they haven't been keeping an eye out for the return of Locke & Co., because they have, but I don't really think they care if they see them again, because they already have what they need, the Six don't fill a void in their lives anymore.
<br>
<br>And now, three years down the road, Sawyer has become a very respected individual among the Dharma community, a leader of sorts.  And when Jack comes back, he immediately wants to take control of the situation, know what's going on, what the plan is, who's doing what, busy busy busy.  But that boat has sailed.  This is Sawyer's house now, he's in charge, and not only does he not want Jack's help, he doesn't <i>need</i> it.  Jack is a doctor, and used to being in a position of power.  But not anymore.  Now he's just a janitor, while Sawyer is Head of Security, and a force to be reckoned with.  The tables have turned, and it will be interesting to see how Jack handles that situation going forward.
<br>
<br>-Any thoughts on what happened to Daniel?  Is he dead?  Did he go crazy?  Did he leave Dharma and go with the Others?  Does that mean when we saw him in the season premiere it was at some point in time between now and three years ago?
<br>
<br>-Hey look, it's mini-Ben!  While we don't know for sure, I think it's a safe bet to say that the flashbacks we saw of Ben seeing his mother in the jungle, and meeting Richard when he tried to run away, have already happened.  It would explain Ben's fascination with a hostile being captured, which is why he brought Sayid a sandwich.  I bet Sayid has a general clue of what's going on, as well.  No one has told him what year it is, but Sayid's a pretty observant guy, the fact that the Dharma Initiative is up and running, and they're driving around in a VW bus among other things probably led him to believe something is up, and this kid introducing himself as Ben probably raises some red flags as well.
<br>
<br>Alright, that's all I can think of for this week.  Next week looks like we'll see lots of explosions, I'm guessing they're probably Kate's fault.<br><br>

]]>

</description>

<link>http://secondcitysaint.com/index.php?id=289</link> 
</item>    

 
<item> 
<title>

<![CDATA[

Random - The Greatest Robbery Never Told
]]>

</title>

<description>

<![CDATA[

I hope this story gains some steam and makes its way around the Interwebs (I know I will do my part to try and expand its reach), because it is a fantastic robbery story, and if there has ever been a more ready-made plot for a robbery-turned-movie, I have never seen one.  How has this not come out in theaters yet?
<br>
<br><a target="_blank" href="http://www.wired.com/politics/law/magazine/17-04/ff_diamonds?currentPage=all">The Antwerp Diamond Center Heist</a> (From: Wired.com)
<br>
<br>I won't post the whole thing here, but here's a quick excerpt:
<br>
<br><div class="hh">In February 2003, Notarbartolo was arrested for heading a ring of Italian thieves. They were accused of breaking into a vault two floors beneath the Antwerp Diamond Center and making off with at least $100 million worth of loose diamonds, gold, jewelry, and other spoils. The vault was thought to be impenetrable. It was protected by 10 layers of security, including infrared heat detectors, Doppler radar, a magnetic field, a seismic sensor, and a lock with 100 million possible combinations. The robbery was called the heist of the century, and even now the police can't explain exactly how it was done.
<br>
<br>The loot was never found, but based on circumstantial evidence, Notarbartolo was sentenced to 10 years. He has always denied having anything to do with the crime and has refused to discuss his case with journalists, preferring to remain silent for the past six years.
<br>
<br>Until now.</div>
<br>
<br>Also, I love that stealing $100 million in jewels gets you 10 years in jail (Well, 5 with good behavior).<br><br>

]]>

</description>

<link>http://secondcitysaint.com/index.php?id=288</link> 
</item>    

 
<item> 
<title>

<![CDATA[

Poker - Congrats to LJ
]]>

</title>

<description>

<![CDATA[

<div align="center"><img src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_PsacXK7n4kY/SbSpWZK1v3I/AAAAAAAAAdg/Z5lZEr3_f1c/s320/2nd_125k.JPG"></div>
<br>
<br>Go congratulate <a target="blank" href="http://lawchica.blogspot.com/2009/03/another-2nd-but-one-im-pretty-happy.html">LJ</a> on her second place finish in the $125k, she cashed for over $18k!!!  Well done!<br><br>

]]>

</description>

<link>http://secondcitysaint.com/index.php?id=287</link> 
</item>    

 
<item> 
<title>

<![CDATA[

Entertainment - LOST 5.8 Thoughts
]]>

</title>

<description>

<![CDATA[

Before we get to this week's episode, I wanted to briefly expand on my thoughts regarding Charles Widmore.  Based on the timeline, what we know so far is that Widmore first met John Locke briefly in 1954.  We also know that Locke was born a few years later, and that Richard was there when he was born, and also visited him as a child, which I would guess was reported back to Widmore on the island.  Later, when Locke is older, Widmore has Abbadon talk Locke into going to Australia to go walkabout after he's paralyzed.  Locke obviously then crashes on the island, and once he leaves, Widmore wants to help him get back to the island.
<br>
<br>This whole series of events raises some interesting questions about Widmore's involvement in...well, everything.  Since Widmore got Locke to go to Australia, does that mean he knew the fate of Oceanic 815?  Is that why he staged the plane crash, because he knew what really happened to the plane?  And if he knew, does that mean he obtained that information from Eloise Hawking?  We know he has an extensive history with Hawking since she was on the island with him at one time, and we also know that he's still aware of her whereabouts (Per his meeting with Desmond), so it's not a stretch to infer that he learned about a "window" opening for entry to the island from Eloise.  However, that makes me wonder why, if Widmore did know about the window, and knew about the flight, why he himself wasn't on the plane, if he does really want to return to the island.
<br>
<br>The Widmore/Hawking relationship also leads me to believe that what I said last week about Ben and Hawking is probably true.  Ben knew who Eloise Hawking is, they had probably even met and had maybe been on the island at the same time for a period of time.  But I believe when Ben got off the island, that he wasn't entirely sure how to get back, and I don't think he was aware of The Lamp Post, or that Hawking was in it, so Locke's reveal to Ben that Eloise was supposed to help him led to his death, and also led Ben to Eloise, which we saw from them working together.  It does make you wonder what Eloise's ultimate purpose is in this, though, if she really is/was helping out Widmore, and at the same time, clearly helping out Ben as well, even though the two are adversaries to say the least.
<br>
<br>But anyways, that's just something to think about that I was pondering during Pop Up LOST last night.
<br>
<br>Our new episode last night I thought was a fantastic character piece on Sawyer and Juliet that also gave us some nice exposition on the Dharma Initiative, their role on the island, as well as how our stranded survivors came to be in their "present day" Dharma jobs.
<br>
<br>It appears that our friends are now stuck in 1974, at a time when the Dharma Initiative is still thriving on the island, in spite of the Others.  At some point in time, Dharma struck a truce with the Others.  We don't know the details of this truce, aside from the fact that Dharma killing any of the Others is against the rules.  Richard Alpert (who else) appears to be the spokesperson for the Others, and I can't help but think that if Widmore was telling the truth to Locke, that he is still on the island as well, perhaps as the leader of the Others.
<br>
<br>Horace is currently in charge of the Dharma Initiative, who we previously met in a dream of Locke's, before Locke discovers the mass grave for all the Dharma people.  We also saw him welcome Ben and his father onto the island, and before that, in a moment I had previously forgotten about, he and his wife at the time Olivia (Ben's school teacher on the island) were present at Ben's birth on the side of the road.  They were offering to help take Ben's mother to the hospital before she died.  So we know that Horace is in charge when our survivors show up (and is apparently in charge until he dies in 1992 with everyone else), and we know that between that time and three years down the road, he will (presumably) marry Amy (Or Michelle Dessler for all you <i>24</i> people out there).
<br>
<br>Charlotte is still on the island, albeit as a five-year old child at the moment, as she told Daniel before she died.  Ben may or may not yet be on the island, but I would not be surprised at all if we encountered him as a child at some point in time while we're in the past.  Dr. Chang is most likely around, he may have just been in another hatch at the time.
<br>
<br>As far as our survivors go, we know that they've integrated into Dharma society in their three years with them.  Sawyer has become head of security (If there's a job he was born to play, that's probably it), Miles is one of his security lackeys, Faraday is still an unknown, although from the season premiere it would appear that he is a construction worker, or an engineer, or something along those lines.  Juliet meanwhile, is a jack of all trades apparently and can work as an auto mechanic, and Jin, well, we're not quite sure what Jin does yet aside from drive around and look for Locke.  Sawyer seems to be a well respected member amongst the Dharma community, and he and Juliet are in love with each other, which is really only appropriate considering their fantastic chemistry together.
<br>
<br>Everything seems to be going fantastically on the island, then Jack, Hurley and Kate show up and look to be ready to disrupt the harmony.
<br>
<br>Let's go through some quick hits:
<br>
<br>-For the record, I love the fact that it used to be Kate & Sawyer, and then Juliet & Jack, and now it's Jack & Kate (sort of) and Sawyer & Juliet.  Oh, and Kate's gonna screw this up somehow and I'm going to hate her even more than I hate her now.  Go back to messing up your own relationships, don't go around ruining others.
<br>
<br>-Small side note, because I've discussed this people before, after their last time flash, Sawyer was still holding onto the rope, even though wherever they went to had no hole, and no well, and therefore no rope.  So I think we can infer that anything that someone is touching, or holding, or sitting in (read: the boat when they were in the water and flashed) comes along with them, even if they didn't originally have it with them before they got there.
<br>
<br>-Faraday said Charlotte disappeared because she died.  I wonder if that's true, or if she disappeared because she already exists in the time period they ended up in.  I think it may have been possible to see yourself when they were moving through time, but once they reached a fixed time period again, I wonder if there are rules against something like that.  I could be totally off base, and she could very well have just stopped moving through time when she died, but it's a possible alternative.
<br>
<br>-Hey look, it's the STATU...oh wait, nevermind it's gone.  God this show is such a tease sometimes.  People have been going on and on and on about the damn 4-toed foot from some statue that we saw at the end of Season 2, so they decide to finally show us the statue...for five seconds, and then they flash again and it's gone.  Bastards.  Tell us more!
<br>
<br>-Hmm, a baby born on the island?  And it was Amy's, so unless she was taking a vacation and got pregnant then, it would appear to have been conceived on the island as well.  So...in 1974, babies are okay.  But at some point in time, that becomes not okay, and the Others have to start importing children in order to keep their numbers up (Perhaps by 1988 when Rousseau had her baby?).  I wonder if the baby has any significance in the grand scheme of things.
<br>
<br>-I wonder what it feels like to have the woman that you love die in your arms, and then later that day see her again, only she's five years old.  I think bizarre is an understatement.
<br>
<br>-The character of Sawyer is fantastic; this can't be said enough.  We never got to see his leadership abilities before because it was all about the power struggle between Jack and Locke, but he's really had the opportunity to come into his own.  I thought his scene with Richard was great.  He knew just what to say to not only tell Richard what his story was, but also to give him enough credibility so that Richard would believe him.
<br>
<br>-"Your friend with the eyeliner" Easily line of the night.
<br>
<br>-Sorry, need to gush about Sawyer a little more; loved the scene with him and Horace, talking about if three years is enough time to get over someone.  We don't get to see it much, but when Sawyer actually opens up to people, that's some of the best stuff on the show right there.
<br>
<br>-No more "Lost in Translation" Jin.  Now we have "Speaks English with an accent" Jin.
<br>
<br>-LeFleur?  No wonder he goes by Sawyer. (EDIT: Sorry, forgot his real last name was Ford.  My bad)
<br>
<br>-Hey, remember Rose, and Bernard, and all the other redshirts with them?  Anybody?
<br>
<br>Alright, I think it's time to wrap this up.  Next week it looks like Sayid will be introduced into the mix, and much to my chagrin it's looking more and more likely that Sun didn't end up in the past with the rest of them, which I can't say I'm happy about.  Still holding out hope, though.<br><br>

]]>

</description>

<link>http://secondcitysaint.com/index.php?id=286</link> 
</item>    

 
<item> 
<title>

<![CDATA[

Personal - Adventures in Plumbing
]]>

</title>

<description>

<![CDATA[

Back when we first bought our place last May, we were made aware of possible leakage issues with our kitchen faucet.  The gist of it was that there was some dripping coming down from the faucet under the sink.  However, we noticed that the leaking was fairly minimal if not non-existent, so the problem sort of faded away to the back of our minds.
<br>
<br>Fast forward to a few weeks ago.  Melissa noticed that water had been collecting in the cabinets underneath our sink for an unknown period of time.  Clearly whatever had been ailing the faucet had gotten worse.  We stuck a vase under there to collect water while we decided what to do.  Well, what started out as one vase became two along with a frying pan, due to the various drips we discovered.
<br>
<br>Now obviously we could call a plumber and have them replace the faucet, but plumbers can get very expensive very quickly, so I wanted to see if there was any way for me to do it instead.  I'll admit, plumbing is not really my strong suit.  I feel pretty comfortable around electronics and carpentry, but things like plumbing and electrical stuff, I just don't know much about it.  So the first thing I needed to do was firm up where exactly these leaks were coming from.  As is the case with most sinks, there's not much room to maneuver, so it took a little while before I really got a good understanding of what the problem was.  Basically, as I said, our faucet was leaking.  It was leaking somewhere internally, and water was collecting in the base of the faucet, and dripping through the the three holes in the sink (Our sink has three holes, but our faucet is just the one hole kind).  So since this wasn't a problem when any actual pipes, per say, and just a faucet needing replacement, I did some googling, and decided the process looked elementary enough that I should be able to handle it.
<br>
<br>After a couple trips to Home Depot, we picked out a new faucet that we liked, and I begun the task of removing the old faucet, which turned out to be easier said than done.
<br>
<br>Here's the thing: As I said, you don't have a lot of room to maneuver around underneath a kitchen sink.  So in theory, the under side of a faucet should be designed with the expectation that it can be assembled and disassembled as easily as possible.  Clearly, whoever designed our old faucet did not follow this same train of thought.
<br>
<br><div align="center"><img src="http://www.secondcitysaint.com/images/capture/2009-02-27_084352.png"></div>
<br>This is the underside of our sink.  You can see on the right the three small pipes that lead up into the faucet.  If you look closely you can see that the bottom part of the faucet is completely threaded, and a round metal fastener has been screwed onto the faucet to help keep it in place.  Certainly a logical idea; the only problem is this metal fastener is two inches wide and COMPLETELY ROUND.  What does this mean?  Well, under normal circumstances it makes it incredibly difficult to grip at all, let alone get enough pressure to actually unscrew it.  As my luck would have it, I wasn't dealing with normal circumstances.
<br>
<br><div align="center"><img src="http://www.secondcitysaint.com/images/capture/2009-02-27_084436.png"></div>
<br>Here's a side view.  You see all that lovely orangish color above the metal fastener?  That would be rust.  As in the fastener is completely rusted to the faucet and is never coming off.  As I said, the faucet was leaking internally, so when it was collecting water and dripping out to different places, that included rusting up the faucet itself.  Joy.
<br>
<br>I spent many hours trying to get this stupid faucet out of the sink, including trying to tear it apart from above, but I just couldn't get it to move.  My uncle suggested I go get a vice grip and see if I can get a wide enough grip on the fastener below to unscrew it, or at the very least loosen it ever so slightly.  No dice.
<br>
<br>After a couple days of this frustration, I had to get it out somehow, because we had no kitchen sink to work with, which makes it fairly difficult to do dishes.  So I decided to go with an off-the-wall idea I had; go rent a saw and cut the faucet in half.  I figured, it's just a faucet, it can't be that hard to cut through.  Plus, if you just run the saw along the top of the sink, and cut the faucet off, the bottom part won't have anything to hold onto and will just drop down.  Problem solved.  So I went back to Home Depot, rented a sawsall, and went to town on it.  And sure enough, I was able to saw right through the faucet, and just like that, problem solved.  (On a side note, sawing through metal rules, I encourage everyone to go try it immediately)
<br>
<br>Well, now that the hard part was out of the way, actually getting the faucet installed was a relatively painless process.
<br>
<br><div align="center"><img src="http://www.secondcitysaint.com/images/capture/2009-02-27_084606.png"></div>
<br>Hey, look at that.  All that faucet has is a nice little bracket, and a small threaded rod that I can attach a nut to.  What a convenient little design for something that resides in such a tight and inaccessible area! [/sarcasm]
<br>
<br><div align="center"><img src="http://www.secondcitysaint.com/images/capture/2009-02-27_084522.png"></div>
<br>Here's the finished product.  It obviously took longer than I had anticipated, but I guess I just didn't count on old faucet removal to be such a chore.  It was actually a really effective project, because it's easy enough that you don't have to know jack about plumbing outside of knowing how to shut the water valves off, yet replacing a kitchen faucet is a good "man's job".  Plus, did I mention that I got to saw a faucet in half?  Okay then.<br><br>

]]>

</description>

<link>http://secondcitysaint.com/index.php?id=285</link> 
</item>    

 
<item> 
<title>

<![CDATA[

Entertainment - Street Fighter IV
]]>

</title>

<description>

<![CDATA[

I picked up Street Fighter IV last weekend, but have been too occupied this week to give it any significant playing time.  Well, I managed to sit down tonight and play for a couple of hours.
<br>
<br>My first thoughts are that it's a nice upgrade to the Street Fighter II franchise (I know there was a III series, but those were only in arcades, so I don't really count them).  It's nothing groundbeakingly different from what you've come to expect from a Street Fighter game.  I can start playing as Ryu and pick up right where I left off in SFII.  There are some new features I'm still adjusting to, countering moves, super combos, force moves, stuff like that, and at the end of the day if you want to get good at the game, you have to know that stuff.
<br>
<br>I really like the graphics, everyone looks roided out of their mind, which took me a second to get used to, but once you do you don't even think about it again.  Everything looks really nice and smooth, and depending on how you finish off opponents it can look really nice.
<br>
<br>It's a much "bigger" game than any Street Fighter game before it.  There are lots of outfit colors to choose from, lots of titles/icons to use when playing online, a lot more stages, more characters, and there are more fighting modes than just the usual Arcade and Vs.  The big addition is a Challenge mode, that features Time Trials, Survivor Challenges, among others.  Completing these helps you unlock extra options in the game.  There is a LOT to do in this game, so while a fighting game doesn't always have a ton of replay value aside from playing with friends, this is a game that actually has a lot to do in single player mode.
<br>
<br>Obviously the game has an Online mode as well, which seems to be pretty fluid.  I've only played a couple matches online, and of course got my ass handed to me both times, but the process was pretty smooth, I would say, so that's a plus.
<br>
<br>One thing I forgot to mention is the handicap feature in Vs. mode.  I don't know if this was something that was available in previous games, but when you are playing against another player, you can handicap yourself anywhere from 4 stars (no handicap) to 0 stars (extreme handicap).  The handicap does a couple of things; first it lowers the health meter you start out with, and second it weakens your offense and strengthens your opponents' offense.  This was helpful for me when I was playing against my brother, who is clearly an inferior Street Fighter player.  I knocked my handicap down to 2 stars and it was a much more entertaining matchup.
<br>
<br>All in all I think it's a pretty entertaining game to play; I love the Street Fighter series, and IV is a great next chapter.  Now I will admit, I don't know if I would have bought it if I had to pay $60 for it (I used a gift card to pay for some of it), because at the end of the day, it's a fighting game, I mean how much can a game change?  I already have SF II: HD Remix on my 360, and I don't know that it's worth it to spend $60 on a newer SF game.  But that's me.  I know some people justify buying a new copy of Madden every year, so I guess it really just depends on whether it's worth it to you or not.<br><br>

]]>

</description>

<link>http://secondcitysaint.com/index.php?id=284</link> 
</item>    

 
<item> 
<title>

<![CDATA[

Entertainment - LOST 5.7 Thoughts
]]>

</title>

<description>

<![CDATA[

I was watching Pop-Up LOST last night before the new episode, and I got a sinking feeling in my stomach when it mentioned Ben's promise to Widmore when he told Jack about a "loose end" he needed to tie up.  I'm very nervous about the well-being of Penny & Desmond.
<br>
<br>Also, I noticed something odd about Kate when they went back to the island; she was all wet, as if she had been in the lake.  But she hadn't (at least not completely); she was laid out on the rocks.  It's probably just a continuity error, I just thought it was strange.
<br>
<br>So last night, as expected, we saw the story of Locke from when he got off the island up until he got back to the island, to complement last week's episode where we learned how the Five got back on the island.  Seemed like a fairly dark episode all around, don't you think?
<br>
<br>-I have some island stuff to discuss, but I'll save it for the end.  First thing we get introduced to is Locke, in Tunisia, right where Ben showed up two years earlier.  Why do we know it's the same spot?  Because Charles Widmore had a camera installed right there.
<br>
<br>-So, Charlotte found a DHARMA polar bear skeleton in Tunisia...does that mean the polar bear used to be the leader of the Others as well, but he too had to turn the wheel and get kicked off the island?
<br>
<br>-If LOST has done anything consistently over the course of the show, it's been the idea that every character on this show is both good, and bad.  They have their character strengths, and their character flaws.  And I think that concept has been very apparent with how Charles Widmore and Benjamin Linus have been portrayed this season.  We have seen a much softer side of Widmore (Asking Desmond about Penny, taking care of Faraday's girlfriend, meeting him on the island, his scene with Locke), while on the flip side we have started to see a lot more of the "evil" Ben that was much more reminiscent of the Ben we knew when we first met him.
<br>
<br>-While we're talking about Widmore and Ben, boy, do they love to lie their asses off or what?  You really can't take anything they say seriously, because who knows if they're ever actually telling the truth?  Widmore claims he wants Locke and the Six to go back to the island, he wants to help Locke achieve that goal.  Somewhat of a change in plans from when he sent a freighter full of mercenaries to kill everyone on the island, no?  He seemed pretty genuine, although the one thing that bothered me is that he seemed unfazed when Locke told him that Richard said Locke had to die.  Widmore said he wasn't going to let that happen.  Widmore knows Richard, shouldn't he take what he has to say a lot more seriously?  That made me wonder just how honest Widmore was being with Locke.
<br>
<br>-Nice knowing you Abbadon.  I'm glad you could take some time during Fringe's American Idol hiatus to grace us with your presence.  I'm so used to him being an FBI agent now, it threw me off to see him so casual.
<br>
<br>-It's interesting to me that Locke was back for such a short time before he died; I guess I had just assumed that he was back for much longer.
<br>
<br>-Not only was Sayid no longer an assassin, but Ben managed to drive him to the point where he joined up with Habitat for Humanity!  But then, the next time we see Sayid, he's putting a bullet in someone and helping Hurley break out from the mental institution.  I'm curious to see how all that played out.
<br>
<br>-WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAALT!  I have a conspiracy theory that the whole reason the writers skipped the three years after The Six got off the island is so that they could logically write Walt back into the show.  "Look, it's the future, so it's okay that he looks like he's 25!"  Seriously, puberty hit that kid hard.  I'm not gonna lie, I'll be disappointed if this is the end of the Walt character, because it certainly felt that way to me.  He was always much more significant than we ever got to see him be, for whatever reason.
<br>
<br>-Kate thinks Locke wants to go back to the island because he has no one to love, and apparently Kate loves someone which is why she won't go back to the island.  However, the person that she loves is already on the island, so...
<br>
<br>-I'd like to think it was Locke's inspiring speech on his hospital bed that got Jack hopping flights across the Pacific trying to find the island again, but I'm going to go out on a limb and assume it was the mention of Christian, and his conversation with Locke, that was the straw that broke the camel's back.
<br>
<br>-I wonder if Locke was planning on killing himself because he knew he had to die in order to get everyone back, or if he was telling Ben the truth with his little speech about his failures.  Because if it's the former, that takes some balls to follow through on something like that.  Quite the leap of faith.
<br>
<br>-Ben is quite the interesting guy.  Shows up in Locke's hotel room, pleads with him not to kill himself, talks him into it, then kills him two minutes later, and makes it look like suicide anyways.  It would appear that Ben wasn't actually going to kill Locke, and only seemed to snap after Locke mentioned Eloise Hawking, which leads to some speculation:
<br>
<br>*What was Ben's relationship with Hawking before this moment?  Did he have one?
<br>
<br>*Was Ben looking for a way back onto the island, and once Locke mentioned that Hawking was supposed to help him, did he then decide he didn't need Locke's help any more?  We all know Ben has felt threatened by Locke and the fact that Locke replaced him as leader (Actually, very similar to the relationship between Ben and Widmore if you think about it)
<br>
<br>*Did Ben know about the Lamp Post DHARMA station?  He had left the island before, but how much of DHARMA's off-island activities was he aware of?
<br>
<br>I just can't help but get the feeling that Ben thought Locke could help him get back to the island, but that he didn't know when or how  to do it himself, but when Locke mentioned Eloise Hawking (Who Ben probably was at least familiar with from the island), he decided he could do the rest on his own, and got rid of Locke.
<br>
<br>-One more thing I wanted to bring up was Widmore's discussion with Locke about a "war" that was coming.  Is this a war with Ben?  Didn't that war already start when he invaded the island?  Where is it going to take place?  Who's going to be involved?  Is the island the ultimate prize?
<br>
<br>-Moving onto island stuff, in the short time we were on the island, I thought we actually learned quite a bit:
<br>
<br>*Locke's leg is all better.  I know he <b>came back from the dead</b>, so that's not really a big deal, just something I wanted to point out.
<br>
<br>*The plane ended up crashing.  Without The Five, apparently.  So what does that mean?
<br>
<br>*The Five went back in time.  Everyone else on the plane, did not.  Oceanic crashed and left people in two different places.  Ajira crashed and left people in two different <i>times</i>.  That's what I'm banking on.
<br>
<br>*Think about it.  When the Survivors on the island were flashing through time, at one point in time they were back at the beach where their old shelter was, only everything was cleared out, gone, as if they were at some point in time in the future.  We also saw the Ajira water bottle, and the two boats (That we also saw at the scene of the plane crash).  So the plane crash happened in the "present", and not in the past.  The only question is, when is the "present"?  Are they three years in the future from when Locke was last there?
<br>
<br>*Which island did the plane crash on?  If it crashed on the main island, then it was far away from where Oceanic crashed, since you can clearly see another island from the beach.  Or did it crash on the other island, and Locke was looking at the main island?  The hatch, or building, or whatever Cesar was in, I don't remember seeing it before, so who knows where they are, exactly.
<br>
<br>*Frank took one of the boats and left.  But he took some woman with him.  Frank has been to the island, so he's not a fool.  So who is this woman that went with him?  And where did Frank go?  Very curious stuff.
<br>
<br>*Why did The Five disappear and go to the past and no one else did?  Ben is from the island, but he left, and he didn't disappear.  Locke was a survivor of Oceanic, but he left the island, then died, and he didn't disappear.  Frank has been to the island before, and he didn't disappear.  Everyone else who (I assume) hasn't been to the island didn't disappear.  But why?  What made those five in particular special from everyone else?
<br>
<br>Things are definitely starting to get complicated on the island.  If we really have two groups of people stuck in two different time periods, then that opens up a whole set of questions regarding how the people in the past are going to get back to the present, what the people in the present are going to do now that they've crashed on the island, have the Others just been chilling out for three years waiting for Locke to come back, stuff like that.  Next week should be pretty emotional, since it's only been 8 episodes for us, but it's been three years for everyone else since they've seen each other.  I wonder if Jin's going to be pissed that Sun left their kid back in Korea.<br><br>

]]>

</description>

<link>http://secondcitysaint.com/index.php?id=283</link> 
</item>    

 
<item> 
<title>

<![CDATA[

Entertainment - LOST 5.6 Thoughts
]]>

</title>

<description>

<![CDATA[

Wow.  LOST took a fairly large step forward last night in terms of plot progression, which has led to a lot of new questions and information to be discovered somewhere down the road.  I think most of us were probably under the assumption that the show would spend most of the season working on getting The Six back to the island.  Instead, they throw us for a loop and end up bringing everyone back in a third of the time.  What's funny to me is that so far I would say The Six have been the less interesting of the two groups thus far this season, and yet this week featured them exclusively, and ended up being wildly entertaining.  So, what did we learn?
<br>
<br>-First, I was thinking a little bit last week about what Charlotte said to Jin about telling him not to have her come back, and I was pondering what that meant, exactly.  Was she talking about Sun?  Was she talking about their child?  Was she talking about Sun under the assumption she's still pregnant?  It was a very vague and cryptic warning, so I just wonder what she meant by that.
<br>
<br>-Locke's note.  I'm trying to remember if Sawyer was reading his note when the plane hit turbulence on 815.  Either way, I like the parallel.  I also thought it was interesting that Jack only had a piece of the letter when he got back to the island.  More on that later.
<br>
<br>-Sorry, let's talk pre-island stuff first.  So DHARMA had a station in Los Angeles called the Lamp Post.  Which makes me wonder, what happened to it when the DHARMA people were killed off on the island?  When did Eloise Hawking get there?  I'm very curious to know more about the history of that station.  But, what we do know is that it helps find when the island will be in a certain point, and for how long.  Because the island is constantly physically moving, which shouldn't come as a surprise to anyone who reads <a target="_blank" href="http://mirrormattermoon.blogspot.com/">The Best LOST Blog</a> out there.  So thanks to the large chalk pendulum and some funky math, they can all go back.
<br>
<br>-Well, not Desmond, who is obviously none too happy to see Ms. Hawking again, nor is he thrilled at the idea of going back to the island.  But as is usually the case with Desmond, I doubt it's the last we've seen of him.
<br>
<br>-So the plan for The Six to return to the island is an interesting one.  They had to recreate the original situation as much as possible to increase the chance of it working.  But they didn't really go any further into it than that.  But it kind of set my mind racing regarding how you "find" the island.  First, the original crash of 815 was different than this.  That crash was caused by Desmond not pushing the button, which led to some electromagnetic issues which crashed the plane.  This time around, it wasn't even so much that they crashed as...transported to the island.  Jack, Kate, it seemed more like they had been sleeping than anything.  Plus, there was the bright light on the plane, and no one remembers actually crashing.  So this was a different method.  I was trying to remember if there was a light on the helicopter right before Desmond started freaking out last season, perhaps that signifies passage into the island.  I'll stop rambling on about what that all meant, but I thought it was all very curious.
<br>
<br>-I loved the scene of Jack at the bar, I was just waiting for that blond to strike up a conversation and discover they were on the same flight together.  I don't know how much I cared for the scene with his grandfather.  I think it kind of threw me off because it was this idea that Jack has a normal life now that he's been off the island for three years, and that involves taking care of your crazy old grandfather, but it just seemed very...random.
<br>
<br>-Ah, evil Kate, how I have missed thee.  I completely agree with <a target="_blank" href="http://jgoat.blogspot.com/">Julius</a> that Kate trying to play Suzy Homemaker and raising a child and all that was all very out of place, and not something you would expect from Kate.  Kate, at her core, is not a good person, despite what she would like you to believe.  She's selfish, dangerous, and is incapable of just "settling down" and living a normal life.  So the fact that she just dumped Aaron, and doesn't want to talk about it with Jack, EVER, sounds much more like the Kate I've come to expect.
<br>
<br>That being said, wtf?  She's beyond upset that someone wants to take Aaron away (Although I wonder how much of that is because of Aaron and how much of that is her not wanting to get caught), and is appalled at the idea of going back to the island, and yet within 24 hours, she dumps the kid, won't talk about it, and is now ready and willing to go back to the island.  So clearly someone said something or did something to her.  And it had to be pretty impressive, because Kate is very stubborn and irrational.  Something she said really stuck with me.  When Jack told her that the shoes he had belonged to his father, she said <i>"Why hold onto something that makes you sad?"</i>  Couldn't help but wonder if this was in reference to Aaron at all.   I look forward to a flashback on this.
<br>
<br>-Fun theory I've heard mentioned by a couple people and I think it pretty awesome: Kate's sudden love-making session with Jack has something to do with her wanting to get pregnant. I don't know if this is so she can parallel Claire on the flight, or if there's some other ulterior motive, but it would make sense why she would do that, and then act all weird around him the rest of the time (Aside from the fact she's about as emotionally unstable as they come).
<br>
<br>-Speaking of flashbacks I'm looking forward to, I really, really want to know how Hurley and Sayid ended up on the flight.  Hurley got on the flight, seemed totally okay with it (Although I question the idea that 73 tickets are available for purchase the day before a flight), but clearly didn't know Ben was also going to be on the flight.  So how did he get there?  And Sayid managed to get himself arrested, yet still was able to get on the flight in handcuffs.  When Kate was on the plane, she was being extradited back to the US.  So what's Sayid's excuse?  Being extradited to Guam?  I actually wonder if perhaps he was arrested for a crime he committed overseas and was being extradited there (Asia, Australia, etc.) and they had to stopover in Guam.  If that's the case, I'd be willing to bet Ben turned him in.  But who knows.  He also seemed a little surprised to see Ben.
<br>
<br>-Speaking of Ben, what the hell happened to him?  As we've seen in the past, Ben can be very effective in a physical confrontation, and the only time we've really seen him get his ass kicked was when he was basically defenseless in the hatch, and when Jack beat the crap out of him after he though Jin, Sayid and Bernard were dead.  There has been speculation that he killed Penny, and his injuries were from Desmond.  I'm not sold on that idea yet.  I know Ben told Widmore that he was going to get revenge for Widmore having Alex killed, but I'm just not sure killing Penny makes sense right now.  But I'm sure we'll find out what happened soon enough.
<br>
<br>-Looks like we have a new regular on the show.  Currently without a name, he gave Jack his condolences for Locke's death at the airport, then was sitting across from Hurley on the plane.  I am guessing we will see more of him.
<br>
<br>-Well, I guess we know where that Ajira Airways water bottle came from, eh?  Although I'm still a little wary of the timing of it all, since that water bottle looked to be in the future, while it looks like The Six have appeared in (What I'm assuming is) the past with the other survivors.  So maybe the water bottle is related to something else.  Like the still mysterious people on the other boat with guns.
<br>
<br>-As I said, Jack, Kate and Hurley were all shown back on the island.  But they didn't seem to crash, they were just sort of...there.  It makes me wonder what happened to the plane, who made it off the plane and who didn't, etc.
<br>
<br>-Frank cleans up nicely, don't you think?  Loved his line "We're not going to Guam, are we?"  Line of the show, easy.
<br>
<br>-Let's talk briefly about the timing of the show.  Here's what we know:
<br>
<br>*At the beginning of the season, we saw The Six three years in the future, that has been their focal time period so far.  The survivors we saw pick up right where Season 4 left off (I mean in real time according to them, since obviously they have been flashing all through time on the island).
<br>*When Ben left the island he moved ten months into the future and appeared in the desert.
<br>*When Locke left the island, he moved to an indeterminable time and place.
<br>*The Six (Well, The Five) returned to the island (as was mentioned) three years after leaving it, arriving in a currently unknown year, although it's most likely in the past some time.
<br>
<br>Now, all that being considered, someone mentioned to me that it seemed to take Jin a second to recognize everyone.  I believe the reason for that is it's three years later for the survivors.  Remember, all the time flash that we saw occurred directly after The Six left the island.  But The Six didn't return for another three years, so I believe that three years have also passed for the survivors since Locke left.  It might not be exactly three years, since time on the island and time everywhere else doesn't seem to match up quite right, but I do think that Locke left, and they never heard from him or anyone again until just then when Jin saw Jack, Kate and Hurley.  So I think that's why it took him a second to realize what the hell was going on.
<br>
<br>The idea that we've skipped over three years on the island, and a pivotal few moments from The Six leads me to believe we have plenty of ammunition for some flashbacks.
<br>
<br>-Jin's working for DHARMA now.  That fits with the idea of Faraday working for Dharma in the early 80s, as we saw at the beginning of the season.  It would also put us at a time when Charlotte was a child on the island, allowing Faraday to go all <i>Twelve Monkeys</i> on us and try to warn someone in the past of a dire situation in the future, only it's futile.
<br>
<br>See, I told you there was a lot to talk about.
<br>
<br>Next week looks ridiculously awesome, as we get to see the resurrection of John Locke (I can't believe they aren't even keeping it a secret anymore!), and I assume we will pick up from him leaving the island, and follow him through his death, to his arrival back on the island.  Which means we'll have to wait an extra week to see what happens to The Five now that they're back on the island, but that's nothing new with LOST.<br><br>

]]>

</description>

<link>http://secondcitysaint.com/index.php?id=282</link> 
</item>    


</channel>
</rss>
