<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:openSearch="http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0/" xmlns:blogger="http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008" xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0" version="2.0"><channel><atom:id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2646757198659358119</atom:id><lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Sep 2024 04:36:59 +0000</lastBuildDate><category>Pair of the Day</category><category>Pair Trade</category><category>RightPairs Development</category><title>RightPairs - Statistical Arbitrage Pair Trades</title><description></description><link>http://rightpairs.blogspot.com/</link><managingEditor>noreply@blogger.com (Alvin Cho)</managingEditor><generator>Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>10</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>25</openSearch:itemsPerPage><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2646757198659358119.post-4813745279530613631</guid><pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 08:48:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-05-08T02:32:25.422-07:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Pair Trade</category><title>Selecting Right Pairs for Pair Trades of Stocks</title><description>We have been busy for several custom report requests and not posted Pair of the Day for two days. This info is temporarily discontinued because we are really busy. A good news is our Pair of the Day will become a portfolio that we choose 1 pair in and another out every day in near future. Another good news is our RightPairs Calculator will be redesigned to be a Windows application rather than an Excel spreadsheet.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Every clients of our custom reports have their own strategies and criteria. They tell us their specific requirement and we can generate a special report contains pairs fulfill the criteria. Some of them are asking about what a good criteria is. I have to say there are no good criteria. Everyone has his own investment style and no single strategy suits for everyone. But there are still some ways to approach profitable criteria. My opinion might not be absolutely right, but, after discussed with many pair traders, the following is some clues to a good criteria:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;ol&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color: rgb(51, 51, 255); font-weight: bold;&quot;&gt;Trading volume&lt;/span&gt;: the larger provides better liquidity and less transaction cost, which is key to good result of arbitrage and pair trading.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-weight: bold; color: rgb(51, 51, 255);&quot;&gt;Headlines and SEC filing&lt;/span&gt;: prevent stocks with recent headlines or SEC filing especially those quarterly or annual reports just announced. That might alter the NORMAL relationship and the historical price is nothing for trading.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-weight: bold; color: rgb(51, 51, 255);&quot;&gt;Distance to regression line&lt;/span&gt;: the larger might not be better. Most farest pairs are driven by headlines and SEC filing, the distance of a good pair is usually between 1.5 to 2.5 standard deviation.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-weight: bold; color: rgb(51, 51, 255);&quot;&gt;Same industries&lt;/span&gt;: same industries is another not so important factor because some pairs not in the same industry have high correlation and keep good relationship. If you can find pairs not in the same industries, your arbitrage opportunity should be much higher than other traders.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-weight: bold; color: rgb(51, 51, 255);&quot;&gt;Correlation&lt;/span&gt;: it might be strange that I list correlation below some other factors. Many textbooks told us correlation is key for pair trades. I don&#39;t think a high correlation is a must to do the pair trade. A perfect correlated pair is absolutely untradable because these two instruments never separate apart. A highly correlated pair is tradable but it usually implies tiny spread even at their historical record. A reasonable range of correlation should be defined in criteria. 0.85 to 0.98 should be considered under different situations.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ol&gt;Defining a profitable criteria is not an easy job. We never involve in customer&#39;s decision for criteria, and some of our client&#39;s criteria have better performance than ours. Most of our clients finalize their criteria in 2 months, and we also offer 2 months free for custom reports. You can &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.jumbosoft.com/dnn/Contact/tabid/61/language/en-US/Default.aspx&quot;&gt;contact us&lt;/a&gt; if you have interests in custom report services.</description><link>http://rightpairs.blogspot.com/2009/05/selecting-right-pairs-for-pair-trades.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Alvin Cho)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2646757198659358119.post-5913157376518166583</guid><pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 03:08:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-05-05T20:13:30.160-07:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Pair of the Day</category><title>Pair of the Day 2009/5/5: AMD vs INTC</title><description>&lt;a onblur=&quot;try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}&quot; href=&quot;https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEifp-imzMhOAHvxDvVfvRKZbH6CJJ0fC01EjV6JV6nq78wDKVHbnzLxhqpKS0t300rQucS_HhpGp1ToEUOmnLQG0yk8nuMNom9FfKIxDdXto-dkIZa2V5x5Zalh3zYEWQ6dlhEaqS_ftP4q/s1600-h/POTD-20090505.JPG&quot;&gt;&lt;img style=&quot;margin: 0px auto 10px; display: block; text-align: center; cursor: pointer; width: 320px; height: 166px;&quot; src=&quot;https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEifp-imzMhOAHvxDvVfvRKZbH6CJJ0fC01EjV6JV6nq78wDKVHbnzLxhqpKS0t300rQucS_HhpGp1ToEUOmnLQG0yk8nuMNom9FfKIxDdXto-dkIZa2V5x5Zalh3zYEWQ6dlhEaqS_ftP4q/s320/POTD-20090505.JPG&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; id=&quot;BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5332542853104956866&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;Pair: AMD (Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.) vs INTC (Intel Corporation)&lt;br /&gt;Industry: Semiconductor - Broad Line&lt;br /&gt;3Month Correlation: 0.9027&lt;br /&gt;Distance: -2.3138 times of Standard Deviation (Negative: The first stock outperformed, Positive: The second stock outperformed)&lt;br /&gt;Ratio (I1:I2): 2.0335  (in quantity)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The RightPairs Calculator is &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.jumbosoft.com/dnn/Download/RightPairsDownloads/tabid/81/language/en-US/Default.aspx&quot;&gt;available for download&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color: rgb(255, 0, 0); font-weight: bold;&quot;&gt;This information is for reference only. It is automatically selected by a special criteria. I am not recommending this pair for trading. Use of this information at your own risk.&lt;/span&gt;</description><link>http://rightpairs.blogspot.com/2009/05/pair-of-day-200955-amd-vs-intc.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Alvin Cho)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEifp-imzMhOAHvxDvVfvRKZbH6CJJ0fC01EjV6JV6nq78wDKVHbnzLxhqpKS0t300rQucS_HhpGp1ToEUOmnLQG0yk8nuMNom9FfKIxDdXto-dkIZa2V5x5Zalh3zYEWQ6dlhEaqS_ftP4q/s72-c/POTD-20090505.JPG" height="72" width="72"/><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2646757198659358119.post-2894185086871515309</guid><pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 02:43:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-05-04T19:46:52.874-07:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Pair of the Day</category><title>Pair of the Day 2009/5/4: CTSH vs SYNA</title><description>&lt;a onblur=&quot;try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}&quot; href=&quot;https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjCa3MYGsng8uz-b8oTrXFAHOcrYNQC7OW9ucfAVbf34_7229JAp_MfG8eYCStKFuGeA5Lys3SwvhNfDumiuWuTQ57zmoYFXHmOKSZJi5T-C1_XjRlQEc_nmojrFaokY5gbi4GuZeYwZgnj/s1600-h/POTD-20090504.JPG&quot;&gt;&lt;img style=&quot;margin: 0px auto 10px; display: block; text-align: center; cursor: pointer; width: 320px; height: 166px;&quot; src=&quot;https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjCa3MYGsng8uz-b8oTrXFAHOcrYNQC7OW9ucfAVbf34_7229JAp_MfG8eYCStKFuGeA5Lys3SwvhNfDumiuWuTQ57zmoYFXHmOKSZJi5T-C1_XjRlQEc_nmojrFaokY5gbi4GuZeYwZgnj/s320/POTD-20090504.JPG&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; id=&quot;BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5332165293480576754&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;Pair: CTSH (Cognizant Technology Solutions) vs SYNA (Synaptics Inc.)&lt;br /&gt;Industry: Business Software &amp;amp; Services&lt;br /&gt;3Month Correlation: 0.9131&lt;br /&gt;Distance: -2.2497 times of Standard Deviation (Negative: The first stock outperformed, Positive: The second stock outperformed)&lt;br /&gt;Ratio (I1:I2): 2.1082  (in quantity)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The RightPairs Calculator is &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.jumbosoft.com/dnn/Download/RightPairsDownloads/tabid/81/language/en-US/Default.aspx&quot;&gt;available for download&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color: rgb(255, 0, 0); font-weight: bold;&quot;&gt;This information is for reference only. It is automatically selected by a special criteria. I am not recommending this pair for trading. Use of this information at your own risk.&lt;/span&gt;</description><link>http://rightpairs.blogspot.com/2009/05/pair-of-day-200954-ctsh-vs-syna.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Alvin Cho)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjCa3MYGsng8uz-b8oTrXFAHOcrYNQC7OW9ucfAVbf34_7229JAp_MfG8eYCStKFuGeA5Lys3SwvhNfDumiuWuTQ57zmoYFXHmOKSZJi5T-C1_XjRlQEc_nmojrFaokY5gbi4GuZeYwZgnj/s72-c/POTD-20090504.JPG" height="72" width="72"/><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2646757198659358119.post-1329931352553298590</guid><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 03:35:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-04-30T20:42:16.235-07:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Pair of the Day</category><title>Pair of the Day 2009/4/30: AMR vs CAL</title><description>&lt;a onblur=&quot;try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}&quot; href=&quot;https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjznbMhpVYskswpE-EPZKfzw-vcRywy96mdf1MXpLvUUkHQHoyKyNrPa5EGTsJ1UfJnNTlNvLdPT0jmcTe_xiBrPjJZr_VosLGxALFoc6SAKZq7wGZa10Ss6SK8ReY8snVAvoeuLTYBOOIN/s1600-h/POTD-20090430.jpg&quot;&gt;&lt;img style=&quot;margin: 0px auto 10px; display: block; text-align: center; cursor: pointer; width: 320px; height: 166px;&quot; src=&quot;https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjznbMhpVYskswpE-EPZKfzw-vcRywy96mdf1MXpLvUUkHQHoyKyNrPa5EGTsJ1UfJnNTlNvLdPT0jmcTe_xiBrPjJZr_VosLGxALFoc6SAKZq7wGZa10Ss6SK8ReY8snVAvoeuLTYBOOIN/s320/POTD-20090430.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; id=&quot;BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5330694379050080594&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;Pair: AMR (AMR Corporation) vs CAL (Continental Airlines, Inc.)&lt;br /&gt;Industry: Major Airlines&lt;br /&gt;3Month Correlation: 0.9425&lt;br /&gt;Distance: -2.0679 times of Standard Deviation (Negative: The first stock outperformed, Positive: The second stock outperformed)&lt;br /&gt;Ratio (I1:I2): 2.4297  (in quantity)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The RightPairs Calculator is &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.jumbosoft.com/dnn/Download/RightPairsDownloads/tabid/81/language/en-US/Default.aspx&quot;&gt;available for download&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color: rgb(255, 0, 0); font-weight: bold;&quot;&gt;This information is for reference only. It is automatically selected by a special criteria. I am not recommending this pair for trading. Use of this information at your own risk.&lt;/span&gt;</description><link>http://rightpairs.blogspot.com/2009/04/pair-of-day-2009430-amr-vs-cal.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Alvin Cho)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjznbMhpVYskswpE-EPZKfzw-vcRywy96mdf1MXpLvUUkHQHoyKyNrPa5EGTsJ1UfJnNTlNvLdPT0jmcTe_xiBrPjJZr_VosLGxALFoc6SAKZq7wGZa10Ss6SK8ReY8snVAvoeuLTYBOOIN/s72-c/POTD-20090430.jpg" height="72" width="72"/><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2646757198659358119.post-7654200651020184473</guid><pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 02:51:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-04-29T19:57:27.082-07:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Pair of the Day</category><title>Pair of the Day 2009/4/29: ICE vs VPRT</title><description>&lt;a onblur=&quot;try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}&quot; href=&quot;https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEj6z1XO0M_oMVxi4uCaZE8RbuDi8A3zQGotwhT02sEvnMPdUWA2Y0__O0Zx_01oPNACzAiqqyPxl6Xf15EJtsk4Q3TCIcLz49SmSawLdaRvdlehmuLtHeViVzK4ecgyZ9AW-pWook5RTGE6/s1600-h/POTD-20090429.JPG&quot;&gt;&lt;img style=&quot;margin: 0px auto 10px; display: block; text-align: center; cursor: pointer; width: 320px; height: 167px;&quot; src=&quot;https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEj6z1XO0M_oMVxi4uCaZE8RbuDi8A3zQGotwhT02sEvnMPdUWA2Y0__O0Zx_01oPNACzAiqqyPxl6Xf15EJtsk4Q3TCIcLz49SmSawLdaRvdlehmuLtHeViVzK4ecgyZ9AW-pWook5RTGE6/s320/POTD-20090429.JPG&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; id=&quot;BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5330313062478386610&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;Pair: ICE (IntercontinentalExchange, Inc.) vs VPRT (VistaPrint Ltd.)&lt;br /&gt;Industry: Business Services&lt;br /&gt;3Month Correlation: 0.9420&lt;br /&gt;Distance: 2.4641 times of Standard Deviation (Negative: The first stock outperformed, Positive: The second stock outperformed)&lt;br /&gt;Ratio (I1:I2): 0.2433  (in quantity)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The RightPairs Calculator is &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.jumbosoft.com/dnn/Download/RightPairsDownloads/tabid/81/language/en-US/Default.aspx&quot;&gt;available for download&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color: rgb(255, 0, 0); font-weight: bold;&quot;&gt;This information is for reference only. It is automatically selected by a special criteria. I am not recommending this pair for trading. Use of this information at your own risk.&lt;/span&gt;</description><link>http://rightpairs.blogspot.com/2009/04/pair-of-day-2009429-ice-vs-vprt.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Alvin Cho)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEj6z1XO0M_oMVxi4uCaZE8RbuDi8A3zQGotwhT02sEvnMPdUWA2Y0__O0Zx_01oPNACzAiqqyPxl6Xf15EJtsk4Q3TCIcLz49SmSawLdaRvdlehmuLtHeViVzK4ecgyZ9AW-pWook5RTGE6/s72-c/POTD-20090429.JPG" height="72" width="72"/><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2646757198659358119.post-7455626782589628644</guid><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 02:45:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-04-28T19:49:40.293-07:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Pair of the Day</category><title>Pair of the Day 2009/4/28: HK vs XCO</title><description>&lt;a onblur=&quot;try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}&quot; href=&quot;https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjedercw3uNqF3oiDbebItoBnfvCr6z-FKW_-FQ8iJK20AzUkwIl2ggt3Fd3Ya1Q4LQ_tV86L_Z15A1rU-JjUc_iX-XDUhwiCYqoAwvbF8djZY0HoEp-S4UTDGrFnSmbn6CO9zhmrNfBJNX/s1600-h/POTD-20090428.JPG&quot;&gt;&lt;img style=&quot;margin: 0px auto 10px; display: block; text-align: center; cursor: pointer; width: 320px; height: 167px;&quot; src=&quot;https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjedercw3uNqF3oiDbebItoBnfvCr6z-FKW_-FQ8iJK20AzUkwIl2ggt3Fd3Ya1Q4LQ_tV86L_Z15A1rU-JjUc_iX-XDUhwiCYqoAwvbF8djZY0HoEp-S4UTDGrFnSmbn6CO9zhmrNfBJNX/s320/POTD-20090428.JPG&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; id=&quot;BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5329939043211677314&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;Pair: HK (Petrohawk Energy Corp.) vs XCO (EXCO Resources Inc.)&lt;br /&gt;Industry: Independent Oil &amp;amp; Gas&lt;br /&gt;3Month Correlation: 0.9121&lt;br /&gt;Distance: -2.2212 times of Standard Deviation (Negative: The first stock outperformed, Positive: The second stock outperformed)&lt;br /&gt;Ratio (I1:I2): 0.5629  (in quantity)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The RightPairs Calculator is &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.jumbosoft.com/dnn/Download/RightPairsDownloads/tabid/81/language/en-US/Default.aspx&quot;&gt;available for download&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color: rgb(255, 0, 0); font-weight: bold;&quot;&gt;This information is for reference only. It is automatically selected by a special criteria. I am not recommending this pair for trading. Use of this information at your own risk.&lt;/span&gt;</description><link>http://rightpairs.blogspot.com/2009/04/pair-of-day-2009428-hk-vs-xco.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Alvin Cho)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjedercw3uNqF3oiDbebItoBnfvCr6z-FKW_-FQ8iJK20AzUkwIl2ggt3Fd3Ya1Q4LQ_tV86L_Z15A1rU-JjUc_iX-XDUhwiCYqoAwvbF8djZY0HoEp-S4UTDGrFnSmbn6CO9zhmrNfBJNX/s72-c/POTD-20090428.JPG" height="72" width="72"/><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2646757198659358119.post-4910232195795469109</guid><pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 01:44:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-04-27T18:47:49.144-07:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Pair of the Day</category><title>Pair of the Day 2009/4/27: ATW vs NBR</title><description>&lt;a onblur=&quot;try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}&quot; href=&quot;https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg9Nd-RBXpEqQ1IFxfvtvZxRuQWh1AQoT5i6JzF0qXbYRdHTrTrKCQpVq9V7O6wo2M0O05aVeSZDrCG-v_rJej3T4Gzg_GCdVNw7dUK_jRnpoIG81tHTpLCjpiXNq7v2wiDf-5J6GTJRNp3/s1600-h/POTD-20090427.JPG&quot;&gt;&lt;img style=&quot;margin: 0px auto 10px; display: block; text-align: center; cursor: pointer; width: 320px; height: 168px;&quot; src=&quot;https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg9Nd-RBXpEqQ1IFxfvtvZxRuQWh1AQoT5i6JzF0qXbYRdHTrTrKCQpVq9V7O6wo2M0O05aVeSZDrCG-v_rJej3T4Gzg_GCdVNw7dUK_jRnpoIG81tHTpLCjpiXNq7v2wiDf-5J6GTJRNp3/s320/POTD-20090427.JPG&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; id=&quot;BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5329552344861435010&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;Pair: ATW (Atwood Oceanics Inc.) vs NBR (Nabors Industries Ltd.)&lt;br /&gt;Industry: Oil &amp;amp; Gas Drilling and Exploration&lt;br /&gt;3Month Correlation: 0.940251&lt;br /&gt;Distance: 1.8957 times of Standard Deviation&lt;br /&gt;Ratio (I1:I2): 0.712621  (in quantity)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The RightPairs Calculator is &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.jumbosoft.com/dnn/Download/RightPairsDownloads/tabid/81/language/en-US/Default.aspx&quot;&gt;available for download&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color: rgb(255, 0, 0); font-weight: bold;&quot;&gt;This information is for reference only. It is automatically selected by a special criteria. I am not recommending this pair for trading. Use of this information at your own risk.&lt;/span&gt;</description><link>http://rightpairs.blogspot.com/2009/04/pair-of-day-2009427-atw-vs-nbr.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Alvin Cho)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg9Nd-RBXpEqQ1IFxfvtvZxRuQWh1AQoT5i6JzF0qXbYRdHTrTrKCQpVq9V7O6wo2M0O05aVeSZDrCG-v_rJej3T4Gzg_GCdVNw7dUK_jRnpoIG81tHTpLCjpiXNq7v2wiDf-5J6GTJRNp3/s72-c/POTD-20090427.JPG" height="72" width="72"/><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2646757198659358119.post-8187278577327674620</guid><pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 16:44:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-04-27T12:53:22.056-07:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">RightPairs Development</category><title>Using RiskLib.NET as backbone of RightPairs software</title><description>I plan to redesign the popular &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.rightpairs.com/&quot;&gt;RightPairs&lt;/a&gt; software to a more powerful calculation agent. Although it is already a multi-thread, multi-agent system and very stable, it is limited to calculation of pair-related factors such as correlations and regression lines. I think time to time about including data retrieval and delivery of reports as kinds of job like calculations. I can use SQL Agent to be the ultimate control of all jobs and my calculation agent can do any job generated by SQL Agent.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A first look of scope of namespace RiskLib.MultiAgent is at &lt;a href=&quot;http://risklib.codeplex.com/Wiki/View.aspx?title=Scope%20of%20namespace%20RiskLib.MultiAgent%20in%20Release%201.0&quot;&gt;CodePlex.com&lt;/a&gt;</description><link>http://rightpairs.blogspot.com/2009/04/using-risklibnet-as-backbone-of.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Alvin Cho)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2646757198659358119.post-6280152360643121417</guid><pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 01:38:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-04-27T08:47:31.028-07:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Pair of the Day</category><title>Pair of the Day 2009/4/24: ESE vs TRMB</title><description>&lt;a onblur=&quot;try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}&quot; href=&quot;https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiguiIuF8cMosDewMq5XQn63fX-h3J_VZZLojXz8q3FGIECUdPR-DACg3YKMs81s7X8TWqfZICgJzg-Eo4GDzUVepxQ8qraUq5pamOW5AgQ9stLGgghJaR_B-_TKZF3n0gLJyJICtKfb08B/s1600-h/POTD-20090424.JPG&quot;&gt;&lt;img style=&quot;margin: 0px auto 10px; display: block; text-align: center; cursor: pointer; width: 320px; height: 168px;&quot; src=&quot;https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiguiIuF8cMosDewMq5XQn63fX-h3J_VZZLojXz8q3FGIECUdPR-DACg3YKMs81s7X8TWqfZICgJzg-Eo4GDzUVepxQ8qraUq5pamOW5AgQ9stLGgghJaR_B-_TKZF3n0gLJyJICtKfb08B/s320/POTD-20090424.JPG&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; id=&quot;BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5328437688233062226&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;Pair: ESE (ESCO Technologies Inc.) vs TRMB (Trimble Navigation Ltd.)&lt;br /&gt;Industry: Scientific and Technical Instruments&lt;br /&gt;3Month Correlation: 0.912123&lt;br /&gt;Distance: 2.23881 times of Standard Deviation&lt;br /&gt;Ratio (I1:I2): 0.4955  (in quantity)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The RightPairs Calculator is &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.jumbosoft.com/dnn/Download/RightPairsDownloads/tabid/81/language/en-US/Default.aspx&quot;&gt;available for download&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color: rgb(255, 0, 0); font-weight: bold;&quot;&gt;This information is for reference only. It is automatically selected by a special criteria. I am not recommending this pair for trading. Use of this information at your own risk.&lt;/span&gt;</description><link>http://rightpairs.blogspot.com/2009/04/pair-of-day-2009424-ese-vs-trmb.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Alvin Cho)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiguiIuF8cMosDewMq5XQn63fX-h3J_VZZLojXz8q3FGIECUdPR-DACg3YKMs81s7X8TWqfZICgJzg-Eo4GDzUVepxQ8qraUq5pamOW5AgQ9stLGgghJaR_B-_TKZF3n0gLJyJICtKfb08B/s72-c/POTD-20090424.JPG" height="72" width="72"/><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2646757198659358119.post-4052485245697198925</guid><pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 02:09:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-04-27T08:47:51.165-07:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Pair of the Day</category><title>Pair of the Day 2009/4/23: OII vs WFT</title><description>&lt;a onblur=&quot;try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}&quot; href=&quot;https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEj03jUffUono1ZXnEzxL0BMlA9L0yUW-Y_KZVOfBOITto5JUy_XJdQz_UTGLKc0BzjPjiJcAgojN7Z4wI6MEqVUwUnnXy5JsSWvhUVLTDfpsZ_mZU1gLWoLpjW9APC16xP-djvSRSwFH-U/s1600-h/POTD-20090423.JPG&quot;&gt;&lt;img style=&quot;margin: 0px auto 10px; display: block; text-align: center; cursor: pointer; width: 365px; height: 192px;&quot; src=&quot;https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEj03jUffUono1ZXnEzxL0BMlA9L0yUW-Y_KZVOfBOITto5JUy_XJdQz_UTGLKc0BzjPjiJcAgojN7Z4wI6MEqVUwUnnXy5JsSWvhUVLTDfpsZ_mZU1gLWoLpjW9APC16xP-djvSRSwFH-U/s320/POTD-20090423.JPG&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; id=&quot;BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5328074603031483714&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;Pair: OII (Oceaneering International, Inc.) vs WFT (Weatherford International Ltd.)&lt;br /&gt;Industry: Oil &amp;amp; Gas Equipment &amp;amp; Services&lt;br /&gt;3Month Correlation: 0.9159&lt;br /&gt;Distance: 3.0413 times of Standard Deviation&lt;br /&gt;Ratio (I1:I2): 0.3403  (in quantity)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The RightPairs Calculator is &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.jumbosoft.com/dnn/Download/RightPairsDownloads/tabid/81/language/en-US/Default.aspx&quot;&gt;available for download&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color: rgb(255, 0, 0); font-weight: bold;&quot;&gt;This information is for reference only. It is automatically selected by a special criteria. I am not recommending this pair for trading. Use of this information at your own risk.&lt;/span&gt;</description><link>http://rightpairs.blogspot.com/2009/04/pair-of-day-2009423-oii-vs-wft.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Alvin Cho)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEj03jUffUono1ZXnEzxL0BMlA9L0yUW-Y_KZVOfBOITto5JUy_XJdQz_UTGLKc0BzjPjiJcAgojN7Z4wI6MEqVUwUnnXy5JsSWvhUVLTDfpsZ_mZU1gLWoLpjW9APC16xP-djvSRSwFH-U/s72-c/POTD-20090423.JPG" height="72" width="72"/><thr:total>0</thr:total></item></channel></rss>