Comments for One more commit

Comment on Fighting feature creep in build scripts by Adam Leggett

Adam Leggett — Wed, 18 May 2253 01:20:54 +0000

As part of our development of Kundo we’ve been grappling with similar issues such as - what should the scope of our build tool be? How much abstraction should it provide?
For example, in terms of scope we have decided to not try and create a ‘project site’ in the style of Maven. We feel that if a build generates raw data about tests, static analysis etc developers can use other tools, such as Hudson and Sonar to produce the reports.
Abstraction is a tricky one. In complex builds you can often find a proliferation of ‘edge cases’ such as ad-hoc scripting tasks and unusual packaging scenarios; situations when conventions do not apply. We decided that we wanted a build tool that could in these circumstances simply leverage the power of Ant, without being bound to a ‘build lifecycle’. But the normal modus operandi would be declarative and convention based (in Kundo this is realised using a build ‘recipe’).
IMO deployment to a managed environment is different problem domain. I’m not sure its a place where Java based systems are a best fit. The type of functionality you need is not tied up in JAR files - it’s in *nix commands. Something like Fabric (http://www.nongnu.org/fab/), which is python based, is an interesting emerging candidate in the deployment automation space.

Comment on Google Web Toolkit as a Sprinkle-On-Top AJAX solution? by Ewa

Ewa — Tue, 20 Jul 2010 09:45:03 +0000

thanx for the post!
waiting for your next one :)

Comment on Fighting feature creep in build scripts by Free Artikle

Free Artikle — Wed, 16 Jun 2010 16:34:24 +0000

gives employ a good ınternet site decent Gives gives thanks for the working hard to help me personally

Comment on Google Web Toolkit as a Sprinkle-On-Top AJAX solution? by driving games

driving games — Thu, 10 Jun 2010 13:57:39 +0000

Hrmm that was weird, my comment got eaten. Anyway I wanted to say that it’s nice to find the info here. I have looked everywhere. Thanks again!
BR

Comment on Google Web Toolkit as a Sprinkle-On-Top AJAX solution? by Loriann Nordan

Loriann Nordan — Mon, 07 Jun 2010 02:07:48 +0000

Good luck everybody! - I will come back again. Are you on facebook or twitter? Will like to follow you.
Thanks

Comment on Google Web Toolkit as a Sprinkle-On-Top AJAX solution? by Jeromy Gionfriddo

Jeromy Gionfriddo — Sat, 29 May 2010 16:25:11 +0000

Hello,just observed your Post when i google something and wonder what hosting do you use for your wordpress,the speed is more faster than my web site, i really need to know it.will back to check it out,many thanks!

Comment on Google Web Toolkit as a Sprinkle-On-Top AJAX solution? by Agata

Agata — Tue, 25 May 2010 21:11:35 +0000

Super artykul, dzieki!

Comment on About by Home Income Profit

Home Income Profit — Thu, 06 May 2010 15:56:50 +0000

Will anybody be able to smell a smoke smell on me?

Comment on The future of Java build tools by verne troyer sex tape here

verne troyer sex tape here — Thu, 06 May 2010 02:54:34 +0000

Is it so important?, http://grou.ps/vernetroyersextape verne troyer sex tape here, 71153,

Comment on Google Web Toolkit as a Sprinkle-On-Top AJAX solution? by Bankowy

Bankowy — Tue, 04 May 2010 13:15:49 +0000

Blog dodaliśmy do ulubionych :) pozdrawiamy autora.