<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/atom10full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0">
  <id>http://www.polltrack.com/feeds/blog/presidential.atom</id>
  <title>PollTrack: Presidential Race</title>
  <subtitle>Tracking elections from the ground up</subtitle>
  <updated>2009-11-09T14:02:21Z</updated>
  
  <link type="text/html" href="http://www.polltrack.com/" rel="alternate" />
  <link rel="self" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/polltrack" type="application/atom+xml" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com" /><entry>
    <id>http://www.polltrack.com/post/1209.atom</id>
    <title>Obama Approval Up Slightly</title>
    <author>
      <name>Maurice Berger</name>
    </author>
    <updated>2009-11-09T14:02:21Z</updated>
    <published>2009-11-09T14:02:21Z</published>
    <link type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/polltrack/~3/1IT7gXbW_7c/1209" rel="alternate" />
    <category term="/Blog/Presidential Race" label="Presidential Race" />
    <category term="/Tag/2009" label="2009" />
    <category term="/Tag/President Barack Obama" label="President Barack Obama" />
    <category term="/Tag/presidential approval ratings" label="presidential approval ratings" />
    <summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;As of Sunday evening, &lt;em&gt;PollTrack &lt;/em&gt;reports a slight increase in President Obama's aggregate approval rating. &lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;51.8%&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt; now have a positive view of the president's performance; 45.0% a negative one. Obama's negative rating, which has slowly increased each week over the past few months, continues to represent a trouble spot for the president.&lt;/p&gt;</summary>
    <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;As of Sunday evening, &lt;em&gt;PollTrack &lt;/em&gt;reports a slight increase in President Obama's aggregate approval rating. &lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;51.8%&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt; now have a positive view of the president's performance; 45.0% a negative one. Obama's negative rating, which has slowly increased each week over the past few months, continues to represent a trouble spot for the president.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/polltrack/~4/1IT7gXbW_7c" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content>
  <feedburner:origLink>http://www.polltrack.com/post/1209</feedburner:origLink></entry>
  <entry>
    <id>http://www.polltrack.com/post/1204.atom</id>
    <title>PollTrack Will Be Back On Monday, 9 November, With Full Reporting </title>
    <author>
      <name>Maurice Berger</name>
    </author>
    <updated>2009-11-06T02:27:07Z</updated>
    <published>2009-11-06T02:27:07Z</published>
    <link type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/polltrack/~3/ftMRTuRCer8/1204" rel="alternate" />
    <category term="/Blog/Presidential Race" label="Presidential Race" />
    <summary type="html" />
    <content type="html">&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/polltrack/~4/ftMRTuRCer8" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content>
  <feedburner:origLink>http://www.polltrack.com/post/1204</feedburner:origLink></entry>
  <entry>
    <id>http://www.polltrack.com/post/1206.atom</id>
    <title>Election 2009: Did Obama's Base Hold?</title>
    <author>
      <name>Maurice Berger</name>
    </author>
    <updated>2009-11-05T13:26:25Z</updated>
    <published>2009-11-05T13:26:25Z</published>
    <link type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/polltrack/~3/NmCfQRBBvmE/1206" rel="alternate" />
    <category term="/Blog/Presidential Race" label="Presidential Race" />
    <category term="/Tag/2009" label="2009" />
    <category term="/Tag/President Barack Obama" label="President Barack Obama" />
    <category term="/Tag/Younger Voters" label="Younger Voters" />
    <category term="/Tag/Voter Enthusiasm" label="Voter Enthusiasm" />
    <category term="/Tag/African-American voters" label="African-American voters" />
    <category term="/State/Virginia" label="Virginia" />
    <category term="/State/New Jersey" label="New Jersey" />
    <summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Another problem for the Democrats in Tuesday's election: parts of the Obama coalition--responsible for his easy victory last year--did not hold. As MSNBC notes: "Obama&amp;rsquo;s Base Is No Longer Fired Up And Ready To Go . . . According to the exit polls, just 10% of the voters in Virginia were under the age of 30, down from 21% last year. What&amp;rsquo;s more, McDonnell won 18-29 year olds, 54%-44%. Also in Virginia yesterday, African Americans made up 16% of the vote, down from 20% last year. And then there&amp;rsquo;s this: 51% of yesterday&amp;rsquo;s voters in Virginia said they voted for McCain, while just 43% said they voted for Obama. Folks, Obama won this state last year by a nearly 53%-46% margin."&lt;/p&gt;</summary>
    <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;Another problem for the Democrats in Tuesday's election: parts of the Obama coalition--responsible for his easy victory last year--did not hold. As MSNBC notes: "Obama&amp;rsquo;s Base Is No Longer Fired Up And Ready To Go . . . According to the exit polls, just 10% of the voters in Virginia were under the age of 30, down from 21% last year. What&amp;rsquo;s more, McDonnell won 18-29 year olds, 54%-44%. Also in Virginia yesterday, African Americans made up 16% of the vote, down from 20% last year. And then there&amp;rsquo;s this: 51% of yesterday&amp;rsquo;s voters in Virginia said they voted for McCain, while just 43% said they voted for Obama. Folks, Obama won this state last year by a nearly 53%-46% margin."&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/polltrack/~4/NmCfQRBBvmE" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content>
  <feedburner:origLink>http://www.polltrack.com/post/1206</feedburner:origLink></entry>
  <entry>
    <id>http://www.polltrack.com/post/1203.atom</id>
    <title>Indepdendent Voters Made The Difference And Now Spell Trouble For The Democrats</title>
    <author>
      <name>Maurice Berger</name>
    </author>
    <updated>2009-11-04T16:00:52Z</updated>
    <published>2009-11-04T16:00:52Z</published>
    <link type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/polltrack/~3/EDqiNMponfA/1203" rel="alternate" />
    <category term="/Blog/Presidential Race" label="Presidential Race" />
    <category term="/Tag/2009" label="2009" />
    <category term="/Tag/partisan identification" label="partisan identification" />
    <category term="/Tag/Independent Voters" label="Independent Voters" />
    <summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;President Obama's approval rating on election day was at 50%. This number suggests a problem for the Democrats, especially to the extend that it reflects a drop off in independent voter support. Indeed, it was the dramatic decline in the support of unaffiliated and independent voters that gave Republicans a decided advantage in Virginia and New Jersey. The situation with indepdendents was dire: Republican Christie won independent voters in New Jersey by 30 points (60%-30%); Obama won them 51%-47% last year. McDonnell in Virginia won
indies by 33 points (66%-33%); Obama held a slight 49%-48% last year.With a nation closely divided between the two mainstream parties, independents can now tip the balance in states and localities where party registration is relatively even. In New Jersey, the message is even more dire for the Democrats: with Democrats enjoying a significant advantage in party identification, Jon Corzine still lost. Does this prefigure Democratic loses in the 2010 midterms? Hard to tell this early. But &lt;em&gt;PollTrack &lt;/em&gt;will be watching independent voters--as well as the President's approval numbers--very closely in the coming months.&lt;/p&gt;</summary>
    <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;President Obama's approval rating on election day was at 50%. This number suggests a problem for the Democrats, especially to the extend that it reflects a drop off in independent voter support. Indeed, it was the dramatic decline in the support of unaffiliated and independent voters that gave Republicans a decided advantage in Virginia and New Jersey. The situation with indepdendents was dire: Republican Christie won independent voters in New Jersey by 30 points (60%-30%); Obama won them 51%-47% last year. McDonnell in Virginia won
indies by 33 points (66%-33%); Obama held a slight 49%-48% last year.With a nation closely divided between the two mainstream parties, independents can now tip the balance in states and localities where party registration is relatively even. In New Jersey, the message is even more dire for the Democrats: with Democrats enjoying a significant advantage in party identification, Jon Corzine still lost. Does this prefigure Democratic loses in the 2010 midterms? Hard to tell this early. But &lt;em&gt;PollTrack &lt;/em&gt;will be watching independent voters--as well as the President's approval numbers--very closely in the coming months.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/polltrack/~4/EDqiNMponfA" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content>
  <feedburner:origLink>http://www.polltrack.com/post/1203</feedburner:origLink></entry>
  <entry>
    <id>http://www.polltrack.com/post/1162.atom</id>
    <title>Obama's Approval Down Slightly </title>
    <author>
      <name>Maurice Berger</name>
    </author>
    <updated>2009-11-02T14:42:55Z</updated>
    <published>2009-11-02T14:42:55Z</published>
    <link type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/polltrack/~3/uYzmDguOapg/1162" rel="alternate" />
    <category term="/Blog/Presidential Race" label="Presidential Race" />
    <category term="/Tag/2009" label="2009" />
    <category term="/Tag/presidential approval ratings" label="presidential approval ratings" />
    <category term="/Tag/President Barack Obama" label="President Barack Obama" />
    <summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;As of Sunday evening, President Obama's aggregate approval rating has
decreased a full percentage point from last week's aggregate number, according
to &lt;em&gt;PollTrack&lt;/em&gt;'s latest calculation: Approve: &lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;50.5%&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt; to Disapprove: 43.2%.&lt;/p&gt;</summary>
    <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;As of Sunday evening, President Obama's aggregate approval rating has
decreased a full percentage point from last week's aggregate number, according
to &lt;em&gt;PollTrack&lt;/em&gt;'s latest calculation: Approve: &lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;50.5%&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt; to Disapprove: 43.2%.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/polltrack/~4/uYzmDguOapg" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content>
  <feedburner:origLink>http://www.polltrack.com/post/1162</feedburner:origLink></entry>
  <entry>
    <id>http://www.polltrack.com/post/1153.atom</id>
    <title>Huckabee Leads GOP Pack For 2012 Presidential Nomination</title>
    <author>
      <name>Maurice Berger</name>
    </author>
    <updated>2009-10-30T14:17:58Z</updated>
    <published>2009-10-30T14:17:58Z</published>
    <link type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/polltrack/~3/NfEnRlpRUy4/1153" rel="alternate" />
    <category term="/Blog/Presidential Race" label="Presidential Race" />
    <category term="/Tag/Election 2012" label="Election 2012" />
    <category term="/Tag/Republican Party" label="Republican Party" />
    <category term="/Tag/Sarah Palin" label="Sarah Palin" />
    <category term="/Tag/Mike Huckabee" label="Mike Huckabee" />
    <summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;According to a new &lt;a href="http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2009/10/28/cnn-poll-7-in-10-say-palin-not-qualified-to-be-president/"&gt;CNN/Opinion Research survey&lt;/a&gt;, 32% of GOP voters say they would support
Mike Huckabee (R), followed by Sarah Palin (R) at 25%, Mitt Romney at
21% and Tim Pawlenty at 5% for the 2012 Republican nomination for president. The survey concludes: "Huckabee appears to have more support
among Republicans than Palin and her unfavorable rating among all
Americans is twice as high as Huckabee's. Palin may attract a lot of
attention but the GOP may be looking elsewhere for their frontrunner."&lt;/p&gt;</summary>
    <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;According to a new &lt;a href="http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2009/10/28/cnn-poll-7-in-10-say-palin-not-qualified-to-be-president/"&gt;CNN/Opinion Research survey&lt;/a&gt;, 32% of GOP voters say they would support
Mike Huckabee (R), followed by Sarah Palin (R) at 25%, Mitt Romney at
21% and Tim Pawlenty at 5% for the 2012 Republican nomination for president. The survey concludes: "Huckabee appears to have more support
among Republicans than Palin and her unfavorable rating among all
Americans is twice as high as Huckabee's. Palin may attract a lot of
attention but the GOP may be looking elsewhere for their frontrunner."&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/polltrack/~4/NfEnRlpRUy4" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content>
  <feedburner:origLink>http://www.polltrack.com/post/1153</feedburner:origLink></entry>
  <entry>
    <id>http://www.polltrack.com/post/1146.atom</id>
    <title>GOP Favorability Slips </title>
    <author>
      <name>Maurice Berger</name>
    </author>
    <updated>2009-10-29T13:47:22Z</updated>
    <published>2009-10-29T13:47:22Z</published>
    <link type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/polltrack/~3/z5ibxBtr-nA/1146" rel="alternate" />
    <category term="/Blog/Presidential Race" label="Presidential Race" />
    <category term="/Tag/2009" label="2009" />
    <category term="/Tag/Democratic Party" label="Democratic Party" />
    <category term="/Tag/Republican Party" label="Republican Party" />
    <category term="/Tag/Voter Enthusiasm" label="Voter Enthusiasm" />
    <summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;According to a new CNN/&lt;em&gt;Opinion Research &lt;/em&gt;survey, the "Republican Party's favorable rating among Americans is at lowest level in at least a decade, according to a new national poll. 36% of people questioned "say they have a favorable opinion of
the Republican Party, with 54 percent viewing the GOP negatively. According to the poll, 53 percent have a positive opinion of the
Democratic Party, with 41 percent holding an unfavorable view. The
survey indicates that favorable ratings for the Democrats have dropped
5 points since February, with the Republican number slipping 3 points. 'The Republican party may still be battling the legacy left to them
by George W. Bush," says CNN Polling Director Keating Holland. 'They
have also spent a lot of time in 2009 working against Democratic
proposals. That hasn't left them a lot of time so far this year to
present a positive, post-Bush message. Of course, there is still plenty
of time for them to do so before the 2010 midterms.'"&lt;/p&gt;</summary>
    <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;According to a new CNN/&lt;em&gt;Opinion Research &lt;/em&gt;survey, the "Republican Party's favorable rating among Americans is at lowest level in at least a decade, according to a new national poll. 36% of people questioned "say they have a favorable opinion of
the Republican Party, with 54 percent viewing the GOP negatively. According to the poll, 53 percent have a positive opinion of the
Democratic Party, with 41 percent holding an unfavorable view. The
survey indicates that favorable ratings for the Democrats have dropped
5 points since February, with the Republican number slipping 3 points. 'The Republican party may still be battling the legacy left to them
by George W. Bush," says CNN Polling Director Keating Holland. 'They
have also spent a lot of time in 2009 working against Democratic
proposals. That hasn't left them a lot of time so far this year to
present a positive, post-Bush message. Of course, there is still plenty
of time for them to do so before the 2010 midterms.'"&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/polltrack/~4/z5ibxBtr-nA" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content>
  <feedburner:origLink>http://www.polltrack.com/post/1146</feedburner:origLink></entry>
  <entry>
    <id>http://www.polltrack.com/post/1152.atom</id>
    <title>Support For "Public Option" At An All-Time High</title>
    <author>
      <name>Maurice Berger</name>
    </author>
    <updated>2009-10-28T13:43:30Z</updated>
    <published>2009-10-28T12:54:40Z</published>
    <link type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/polltrack/~3/bbs98g8mbNY/1152" rel="alternate" />
    <category term="/Blog/Presidential Race" label="Presidential Race" />
    <category term="/Tag/2009" label="2009" />
    <category term="/Tag/health insurance" label="health insurance" />
    <category term="/Tag/healthcare" label="healthcare" />
    <category term="/Tag/Voter Enthusiasm" label="Voter Enthusiasm" />
    <summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;A new &lt;a href="http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2009/10/27/2109332.aspx?ocid=twitter"&gt;NBC/Wall Street Journal poll&lt;/a&gt; reports that support for the so-called&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt; "public option"&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt;--a government-run insurance plan--at its highest level
since the debate began with&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt; 48%&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt; in favor of the idea while 42% oppose
it.&lt;/p&gt;</summary>
    <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;A new &lt;a href="http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2009/10/27/2109332.aspx?ocid=twitter"&gt;NBC/Wall Street Journal poll&lt;/a&gt; reports that support for the so-called&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt; "public option"&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt;--a government-run insurance plan--at its highest level
since the debate began with&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt; 48%&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt; in favor of the idea while 42% oppose
it.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/polltrack/~4/bbs98g8mbNY" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content>
  <feedburner:origLink>http://www.polltrack.com/post/1152</feedburner:origLink></entry>
  <entry>
    <id>http://www.polltrack.com/post/1149.atom</id>
    <title>Vice-President Biden's Favorability Rating Collapses</title>
    <author>
      <name>Maurice Berger</name>
    </author>
    <updated>2009-10-27T14:22:35Z</updated>
    <published>2009-10-27T14:22:35Z</published>
    <link type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/polltrack/~3/fRtjVmydRe0/1149" rel="alternate" />
    <category term="/Blog/Presidential Race" label="Presidential Race" />
    <category term="/Tag/2009" label="2009" />
    <category term="/Tag/Joe Biden" label="Joe Biden" />
    <category term="/Tag/Vice=Presidential Approval Rating" label="Vice=Presidential Approval Rating" />
    <summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.gallup.com/poll/123860/Vice-President-Biden-Favorable-Rating-Continues-Decline.aspx"&gt;According to a new Gallup survey, Vice-President Joe Biden's favorability rating has reached an all-time low&lt;/a&gt;: "After peaking at 59% last November, Biden's
favorable rating continues to decline and now stands at 42%. That
barely exceeds his 40% unfavorable rating, and is easily his worst
evaluation since last year's Democratic National Convention. Biden's favorable rating has dropped by five or six points each of
the last three times Gallup has updated it -- in January, before Barack
Obama's inauguration; in July; and in the most recent poll. . . . The source of the decline -- by party affiliation -- has varied over
time. During the post-election to pre-inauguration phase, Biden's
favorable rating dropped significantly among Democrats, but it has been
fairly steady since, and remains strong at 73%. Republicans had relatively low opinions of Biden even at the peak of
his popularity, with 33% holding a favorable opinion of him. Those
views did not change appreciably until after he took office, but
Republicans' views of Biden have declined in both post-inauguration
readings, and now stand at 18% favorable. Independents' opinions of Biden have declined more steadily since
the post-election high mark, and now 32% of independents view the vice
president favorably."&lt;/p&gt;</summary>
    <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.gallup.com/poll/123860/Vice-President-Biden-Favorable-Rating-Continues-Decline.aspx"&gt;According to a new Gallup survey, Vice-President Joe Biden's favorability rating has reached an all-time low&lt;/a&gt;: "After peaking at 59% last November, Biden's
favorable rating continues to decline and now stands at 42%. That
barely exceeds his 40% unfavorable rating, and is easily his worst
evaluation since last year's Democratic National Convention. Biden's favorable rating has dropped by five or six points each of
the last three times Gallup has updated it -- in January, before Barack
Obama's inauguration; in July; and in the most recent poll. . . . The source of the decline -- by party affiliation -- has varied over
time. During the post-election to pre-inauguration phase, Biden's
favorable rating dropped significantly among Democrats, but it has been
fairly steady since, and remains strong at 73%. Republicans had relatively low opinions of Biden even at the peak of
his popularity, with 33% holding a favorable opinion of him. Those
views did not change appreciably until after he took office, but
Republicans' views of Biden have declined in both post-inauguration
readings, and now stand at 18% favorable. Independents' opinions of Biden have declined more steadily since
the post-election high mark, and now 32% of independents view the vice
president favorably."&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/polltrack/~4/fRtjVmydRe0" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content>
  <feedburner:origLink>http://www.polltrack.com/post/1149</feedburner:origLink></entry>
  <entry>
    <id>http://www.polltrack.com/post/1145.atom</id>
    <title>Obama Approval Up This Week</title>
    <author>
      <name>Maurice Berger</name>
    </author>
    <updated>2009-10-26T13:52:41Z</updated>
    <published>2009-10-26T13:52:41Z</published>
    <link type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/polltrack/~3/Y5nUumG0H58/1145" rel="alternate" />
    <category term="/Blog/Presidential Race" label="Presidential Race" />
    <category term="/Tag/2009" label="2009" />
    <category term="/Tag/President Barack Obama" label="President Barack Obama" />
    <category term="/Tag/presidential approval ratings" label="presidential approval ratings" />
    <summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;As of Sunday evening, President Obama's aggregate approval rating has increased somewhat over last's week's 50.3% aggregate number, according to &lt;em&gt;PollTrack&lt;/em&gt;'s latest calculation: Approve: &lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;51.5%&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt; to Disapprove: 44.5%. Once again,
the President's approval number, but now elevated disapproval rating suggests the possibility of trouble ahead for the administration.&lt;/p&gt;</summary>
    <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;As of Sunday evening, President Obama's aggregate approval rating has increased somewhat over last's week's 50.3% aggregate number, according to &lt;em&gt;PollTrack&lt;/em&gt;'s latest calculation: Approve: &lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;51.5%&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt; to Disapprove: 44.5%. Once again,
the President's approval number, but now elevated disapproval rating suggests the possibility of trouble ahead for the administration.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/polltrack/~4/Y5nUumG0H58" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content>
  <feedburner:origLink>http://www.polltrack.com/post/1145</feedburner:origLink></entry>
  <entry>
    <id>http://www.polltrack.com/post/1142.atom</id>
    <title>Obama Continues To Lead Hypothetical 2012 Challengers</title>
    <author>
      <name>Maurice Berger</name>
    </author>
    <updated>2009-10-23T14:49:33Z</updated>
    <published>2009-10-23T14:49:33Z</published>
    <link type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/polltrack/~3/7m2hamgIcsQ/1142" rel="alternate" />
    <category term="/Blog/Presidential Race" label="Presidential Race" />
    <category term="/Tag/Election 2012" label="Election 2012" />
    <category term="/Tag/President Barack Obama" label="President Barack Obama" />
    <category term="/Tag/Republican Party" label="Republican Party" />
    <summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://publicpolicypolling.blogspot.com/2009/10/obama-continues-to-lead-2012-contests.html"&gt;According to a new Public Policy Polling analysis&lt;/a&gt;, "Barack Obama continues
to lead his most likely 2012 rivals in hypothetical contests for
reelection. Obama leads Mike Huckabee 47-43, Mitt Romney 48-40, Sarah Palin 52-40, and Tim Pawlenty 50-30.&lt;br /&gt;This
is the seventh time PPP has conducted this poll and the seventh time
Huckabee has polled closest to Obama. Speaking to the weakness of the
field of potential Republican candidates he's the only with a positive
favorability rating and even then it's only 33/29. Huckabee's
doing well because he connects better than the other GOP hopefuls with
voters in the Midwest and South. For instance while Romney, Palin, and
Pawlenty trail by 9, 17, and 18 points respectively in the Midwest
Huckabee is down by just 3, something that could be a good omen for his
prospects of again winning the Iowa primary as he did in 2008."&lt;/p&gt;</summary>
    <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://publicpolicypolling.blogspot.com/2009/10/obama-continues-to-lead-2012-contests.html"&gt;According to a new Public Policy Polling analysis&lt;/a&gt;, "Barack Obama continues
to lead his most likely 2012 rivals in hypothetical contests for
reelection. Obama leads Mike Huckabee 47-43, Mitt Romney 48-40, Sarah Palin 52-40, and Tim Pawlenty 50-30.&lt;br /&gt;This
is the seventh time PPP has conducted this poll and the seventh time
Huckabee has polled closest to Obama. Speaking to the weakness of the
field of potential Republican candidates he's the only with a positive
favorability rating and even then it's only 33/29. Huckabee's
doing well because he connects better than the other GOP hopefuls with
voters in the Midwest and South. For instance while Romney, Palin, and
Pawlenty trail by 9, 17, and 18 points respectively in the Midwest
Huckabee is down by just 3, something that could be a good omen for his
prospects of again winning the Iowa primary as he did in 2008."&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/polltrack/~4/7m2hamgIcsQ" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content>
  <feedburner:origLink>http://www.polltrack.com/post/1142</feedburner:origLink></entry>
  <entry>
    <id>http://www.polltrack.com/post/1139.atom</id>
    <title>Obama Quarterly Approval Decline Worst On Record</title>
    <author>
      <name>Maurice Berger</name>
    </author>
    <updated>2009-10-22T14:44:53Z</updated>
    <published>2009-10-22T14:44:53Z</published>
    <link type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/polltrack/~3/5l9KERyoSkU/1139" rel="alternate" />
    <category term="/Blog/Presidential Race" label="Presidential Race" />
    <category term="/Tag/2009" label="2009" />
    <category term="/Tag/President Barack Obama" label="President Barack Obama" />
    <category term="/Tag/presidential approval ratings" label="presidential approval ratings" />
    <summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;"In Gallup Daily tracking that spans Barack Obama's third quarter in
office (July 20 through Oct. 19), the president averaged a 53% job
approval rating. That is down sharply from his prior quarterly
averages, which were both above 60%. In fact, the 9-point drop in the most recent quarter is the largest
Gallup has ever measured for an elected president between the second
and third quarters of his term, dating back to 1953. One president who
was not elected to his first term -- Harry Truman -- had a 13-point
drop between his second and third quarters in office in 1945 and 1946." Here is Gallup's Chart:&lt;/p&gt;</summary>
    <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;"In Gallup Daily tracking that spans Barack Obama's third quarter in
office (July 20 through Oct. 19), the president averaged a 53% job
approval rating. That is down sharply from his prior quarterly
averages, which were both above 60%. In fact, the 9-point drop in the most recent quarter is the largest
Gallup has ever measured for an elected president between the second
and third quarters of his term, dating back to 1953. One president who
was not elected to his first term -- Harry Truman -- had a 13-point
drop between his second and third quarters in office in 1945 and 1946." Here is Gallup's Chart:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align="center"&gt;&lt;img src="http://sas-origin.onstreammedia.com/origin/gallupinc/GallupSpaces/Production/Cms/POLL/8uvbgdzzyumsqenbxegatq.gif" border="0" height="330" hspace="0" alt="Change in Presidential Job Approval Averages, Second to Third Quarter in Office, Elected Presidents" width="434" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/polltrack/~4/5l9KERyoSkU" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content>
  <feedburner:origLink>http://www.polltrack.com/post/1139</feedburner:origLink></entry>
  <entry>
    <id>http://www.polltrack.com/post/1134.atom</id>
    <title>Voters Mostly Negative On Sarah Palin</title>
    <author>
      <name>Maurice Berger</name>
    </author>
    <updated>2009-10-21T15:09:08Z</updated>
    <published>2009-10-21T15:09:08Z</published>
    <link type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/polltrack/~3/u5ZhW-ltpCk/1134" rel="alternate" />
    <category term="/Blog/Presidential Race" label="Presidential Race" />
    <category term="/Tag/2009" label="2009" />
    <category term="/Tag/Election 2012" label="Election 2012" />
    <category term="/Tag/Sarah Palin" label="Sarah Palin" />
    <category term="/Tag/Republican Party" label="Republican Party" />
    <summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.gallup.com/poll/123698/John-Edwards-Sarah-Palin-Favorable-Ratings-Slide.aspx"&gt;According to Gallup, Sarah Palin's national standing remains relatively low&lt;/a&gt;: "Palin became a bit of a sensation after John McCain tapped her as
his running mate last August. But over the course of the campaign, her
image suffered, going from a 53% favorable rating immediately after the
2008 Republican National Convention to 42% by the end of the campaign. Palin's ratings have not recovered, and her current 40% favorable
rating is the lowest for her since she became widely known after last
year's Republican convention."As for her chances in 2012, Gallup finds that sge is still popular with the Republican base, faring competitively against other GOP leaders like Mike Huckabee and Mitt Romney: "Palin could compete for the 2012 nomination because she is still widely
liked by Republicans -- 69% have a favorable opinion of her while only
25% view her unfavorably. But she may have difficulty succeeding in the
general election, given that Democrats have overwhelmingly negative
opinions of her, and independents view her more negatively than
positively."&lt;/p&gt;</summary>
    <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.gallup.com/poll/123698/John-Edwards-Sarah-Palin-Favorable-Ratings-Slide.aspx"&gt;According to Gallup, Sarah Palin's national standing remains relatively low&lt;/a&gt;: "Palin became a bit of a sensation after John McCain tapped her as
his running mate last August. But over the course of the campaign, her
image suffered, going from a 53% favorable rating immediately after the
2008 Republican National Convention to 42% by the end of the campaign. Palin's ratings have not recovered, and her current 40% favorable
rating is the lowest for her since she became widely known after last
year's Republican convention."As for her chances in 2012, Gallup finds that sge is still popular with the Republican base, faring competitively against other GOP leaders like Mike Huckabee and Mitt Romney: "Palin could compete for the 2012 nomination because she is still widely
liked by Republicans -- 69% have a favorable opinion of her while only
25% view her unfavorably. But she may have difficulty succeeding in the
general election, given that Democrats have overwhelmingly negative
opinions of her, and independents view her more negatively than
positively."&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/polltrack/~4/u5ZhW-ltpCk" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content>
  <feedburner:origLink>http://www.polltrack.com/post/1134</feedburner:origLink></entry>
  <entry>
    <id>http://www.polltrack.com/post/1137.atom</id>
    <title>Support For "Public Option" Remains High</title>
    <author>
      <name>Maurice Berger</name>
    </author>
    <updated>2009-10-20T13:57:26Z</updated>
    <published>2009-10-20T13:57:26Z</published>
    <link type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/polltrack/~3/IwvCM6ojtdI/1137" rel="alternate" />
    <category term="/Blog/Presidential Race" label="Presidential Race" />
    <category term="/Tag/2009" label="2009" />
    <category term="/Tag/healthcare" label="healthcare" />
    <category term="/Tag/President Barack Obama" label="President Barack Obama" />
    <category term="/Tag/US Congress" label="US Congress" />
    <summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/10/19/AR2009101902451.html?hpid=topnews"&gt;According to a new &lt;em&gt;Washington Post&lt;/em&gt;/ABC News poll&lt;/a&gt;, "support for a government-run health-care plan to compete with private
insurers has rebounded from its summertime lows and wins clear majority
support from the public. . . On the issue that has been perhaps the most pronounced flash point in
the national debate, 57 percent of all Americans now favor a public
insurance option, while 40 percent oppose it. Support has risen since
mid-August, when a bare majority, 52 percent, said they favored it. . . .If a public plan were run by the states and available only to those
who lack affordable private options, support for it jumps to 76
percent. Under those circumstances, even a majority of Republicans, 56
percent, would be in favor of it, about double their level of support
without such a limitation."&lt;/p&gt;</summary>
    <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/10/19/AR2009101902451.html?hpid=topnews"&gt;According to a new &lt;em&gt;Washington Post&lt;/em&gt;/ABC News poll&lt;/a&gt;, "support for a government-run health-care plan to compete with private
insurers has rebounded from its summertime lows and wins clear majority
support from the public. . . On the issue that has been perhaps the most pronounced flash point in
the national debate, 57 percent of all Americans now favor a public
insurance option, while 40 percent oppose it. Support has risen since
mid-August, when a bare majority, 52 percent, said they favored it. . . .If a public plan were run by the states and available only to those
who lack affordable private options, support for it jumps to 76
percent. Under those circumstances, even a majority of Republicans, 56
percent, would be in favor of it, about double their level of support
without such a limitation."&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/polltrack/~4/IwvCM6ojtdI" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content>
  <feedburner:origLink>http://www.polltrack.com/post/1137</feedburner:origLink></entry>
  <entry>
    <id>http://www.polltrack.com/post/1135.atom</id>
    <title>Obama Approval Drops Slightly</title>
    <author>
      <name>Maurice Berger</name>
    </author>
    <updated>2009-10-25T15:27:15Z</updated>
    <published>2009-10-19T14:06:02Z</published>
    <link type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/polltrack/~3/DziRPoUM9fM/1135" rel="alternate" />
    <category term="/Blog/Presidential Race" label="Presidential Race" />
    <category term="/Tag/2009" label="2009" />
    <category term="/Tag/President Barack Obama" label="President Barack Obama" />
    <category term="/Tag/presidential approval ratings" label="presidential approval ratings" />
    <summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;As of Sunday evening, President Obama's aggregate approval rating has dropped slightly, according to &lt;em&gt;PollTrack&lt;/em&gt;'s latest calculation: Approve: &lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;50.3%&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt; to Disapprove: 45%. What may be more telling about these numbers is not the President's approval number, but his consistently rising disapproval rating, now at an all time high since he took office.&lt;/p&gt;</summary>
    <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;As of Sunday evening, President Obama's aggregate approval rating has dropped slightly, according to &lt;em&gt;PollTrack&lt;/em&gt;'s latest calculation: Approve: &lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;50.3%&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt; to Disapprove: 45%. What may be more telling about these numbers is not the President's approval number, but his consistently rising disapproval rating, now at an all time high since he took office.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/polltrack/~4/DziRPoUM9fM" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content>
  <feedburner:origLink>http://www.polltrack.com/post/1135</feedburner:origLink></entry>
  <entry>
    <id>http://www.polltrack.com/post/1131.atom</id>
    <title>Two-Thirds of Americans Support Death Penalty</title>
    <author>
      <name>Maurice Berger</name>
    </author>
    <updated>2009-10-16T13:44:24Z</updated>
    <published>2009-10-16T13:44:24Z</published>
    <link type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/polltrack/~3/AJW85XRxlKw/1131" rel="alternate" />
    <category term="/Blog/Presidential Race" label="Presidential Race" />
    <category term="/Tag/2009" label="2009" />
    <category term="/Tag/death penalty" label="death penalty" />
    <summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.gallup.com/poll/123638/In-U.S.-Two-Thirds-Continue-Support-Death-Penalty.aspx"&gt;Gallup reports in its annual Crime Survey&lt;/a&gt; that 65% of Americans continue to
support the use of the death penalty for persons convicted of murder,
while 31% oppose it. These numbers continue a trend that has shown little change
over the last six years. Gallup continues: "Gallup's death-penalty data stretch back more than seven decades --
making attitudes toward the death penalty one of Gallup's oldest
trends. Gallup's earliest reading, in 1936, found that 59% of Americans
supported the use of the death penalty in cases of murder, compared to
38% who opposed it. The all-time high level of 80% support came in
September 1994, just before the midterm elections that swept Democrats
out of power and at a time when Americans most often cited crime as the
most important problem facing the nation. The low points came in the
period of time from the mid-1950s through the early 1970s. During some
of this time, the death penalty was illegal, and support dropped as low
as 42% in 1966."&lt;/p&gt;</summary>
    <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.gallup.com/poll/123638/In-U.S.-Two-Thirds-Continue-Support-Death-Penalty.aspx"&gt;Gallup reports in its annual Crime Survey&lt;/a&gt; that 65% of Americans continue to
support the use of the death penalty for persons convicted of murder,
while 31% oppose it. These numbers continue a trend that has shown little change
over the last six years. Gallup continues: "Gallup's death-penalty data stretch back more than seven decades --
making attitudes toward the death penalty one of Gallup's oldest
trends. Gallup's earliest reading, in 1936, found that 59% of Americans
supported the use of the death penalty in cases of murder, compared to
38% who opposed it. The all-time high level of 80% support came in
September 1994, just before the midterm elections that swept Democrats
out of power and at a time when Americans most often cited crime as the
most important problem facing the nation. The low points came in the
period of time from the mid-1950s through the early 1970s. During some
of this time, the death penalty was illegal, and support dropped as low
as 42% in 1966."&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/polltrack/~4/AJW85XRxlKw" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content>
  <feedburner:origLink>http://www.polltrack.com/post/1131</feedburner:origLink></entry>
  <entry>
    <id>http://www.polltrack.com/post/1128.atom</id>
    <title>Voters Skeptical About Afghan War</title>
    <author>
      <name>Maurice Berger</name>
    </author>
    <updated>2009-10-15T13:41:36Z</updated>
    <published>2009-10-15T13:41:36Z</published>
    <link type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/polltrack/~3/eQPcu6EIxIA/1128" rel="alternate" />
    <category term="/Blog/Presidential Race" label="Presidential Race" />
    <category term="/Tag/2009" label="2009" />
    <category term="/Tag/Afghanistan" label="Afghanistan" />
    <summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/current_events/afghanistan/45_say_u_s_can_win_war_in_afghanistan_29_disagree"&gt;According to a new Rasmussen survey&lt;/a&gt;, American voters "aren&amp;rsquo;t brimming with confidence that the United States 
can win the war in Afghanistan, but, despite news reports of a worsening 
situation there, support for a continued U.S. military presence in the country 
is unchanged. [The poll] finds that 
45% of voters believe it is possible for the United States to win the 
eight-year-old war in Afghanistan. 29% do not think a U.S. 
victory is possible there, and another 25% aren&amp;rsquo;t sure. But 52% of voters continue to believe that no firm timetable 
should be set for the withdrawal of U.S. troops from Afghanistan . . . 58% of men say America can win the war 
in Afghanistan. Women are evenly divided. 60% of Republicans say a U.S. victory is 
possible, a view shared by just 35% of Democrats and 41% of voters not 
affiliated with either party."&lt;/p&gt;</summary>
    <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/current_events/afghanistan/45_say_u_s_can_win_war_in_afghanistan_29_disagree"&gt;According to a new Rasmussen survey&lt;/a&gt;, American voters "aren&amp;rsquo;t brimming with confidence that the United States 
can win the war in Afghanistan, but, despite news reports of a worsening 
situation there, support for a continued U.S. military presence in the country 
is unchanged. [The poll] finds that 
45% of voters believe it is possible for the United States to win the 
eight-year-old war in Afghanistan. 29% do not think a U.S. 
victory is possible there, and another 25% aren&amp;rsquo;t sure. But 52% of voters continue to believe that no firm timetable 
should be set for the withdrawal of U.S. troops from Afghanistan . . . 58% of men say America can win the war 
in Afghanistan. Women are evenly divided. 60% of Republicans say a U.S. victory is 
possible, a view shared by just 35% of Democrats and 41% of voters not 
affiliated with either party."&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/polltrack/~4/eQPcu6EIxIA" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content>
  <feedburner:origLink>http://www.polltrack.com/post/1128</feedburner:origLink></entry>
  <entry>
    <id>http://www.polltrack.com/post/1130.atom</id>
    <title>Rasmussen: Voters Split on Health Care Plan </title>
    <author>
      <name>Maurice Berger</name>
    </author>
    <updated>2009-10-14T13:49:58Z</updated>
    <published>2009-10-14T13:49:58Z</published>
    <link type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/polltrack/~3/qoYjcdOSC-0/1130" rel="alternate" />
    <category term="/Blog/Presidential Race" label="Presidential Race" />
    <category term="/Tag/2009" label="2009" />
    <category term="/Tag/healthcare" label="healthcare" />
    <category term="/Tag/President Barack Obama" label="President Barack Obama" />
    <category term="/Tag/US Congress" label="US Congress" />
    <summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;</summary>
    <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/polltrack/~4/qoYjcdOSC-0" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content>
  <feedburner:origLink>http://www.polltrack.com/post/1130</feedburner:origLink></entry>
  <entry>
    <id>http://www.polltrack.com/post/1126.atom</id>
    <title>Record Low Support For Stricter Gun Laws</title>
    <author>
      <name>Maurice Berger</name>
    </author>
    <updated>2009-10-13T13:39:43Z</updated>
    <published>2009-10-13T13:39:43Z</published>
    <link type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/polltrack/~3/hIElbwrW204/1126" rel="alternate" />
    <category term="/Blog/Presidential Race" label="Presidential Race" />
    <category term="/Tag/2009" label="2009" />
    <category term="/Tag/gun control" label="gun control" />
    <category term="/Tag/guns" label="guns" />
    <summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.gallup.com/poll/123596/In-U.S.-Record-Low-Support-Stricter-Gun-Laws.aspx"&gt;According to a new Gallup survey&lt;/a&gt;, a record low of 44% of Americans say the laws covering
firearm sales should be made more strict. That is down 5 points in the
last year and 34 points from the high of 78% recorded the first time
the question was asked, in 1990. Here is Gallup's chart:&lt;/p&gt;</summary>
    <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.gallup.com/poll/123596/In-U.S.-Record-Low-Support-Stricter-Gun-Laws.aspx"&gt;According to a new Gallup survey&lt;/a&gt;, a record low of 44% of Americans say the laws covering
firearm sales should be made more strict. That is down 5 points in the
last year and 34 points from the high of 78% recorded the first time
the question was asked, in 1990. Here is Gallup's chart:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align="center"&gt;&lt;img src="http://sas-origin.onstreammedia.com/origin/gallupinc/GallupSpaces/Production/Cms/POLL/wcxhxkuevkcy-dpw4eza3w.gif" border="0" height="324" hspace="0" alt="Do You Feel That Laws Covering the Sale of Firearms Should Be Made More Strict, Less Strict, or Kept as They Are Now?" width="540" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/polltrack/~4/hIElbwrW204" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content>
  <feedburner:origLink>http://www.polltrack.com/post/1126</feedburner:origLink></entry>
  <entry>
    <id>http://www.polltrack.com/post/1127.atom</id>
    <title>US Voters Oppose Health Insurance "Penalty"</title>
    <author>
      <name>Maurice Berger</name>
    </author>
    <updated>2009-10-12T13:49:43Z</updated>
    <published>2009-10-12T13:49:43Z</published>
    <link type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/polltrack/~3/XJIUqAAzgvI/1127" rel="alternate" />
    <category term="/Blog/Presidential Race" label="Presidential Race" />
    <category term="/Tag/2009" label="2009" />
    <category term="/Tag/healthcare" label="healthcare" />
    <category term="/Tag/health insurance" label="health insurance" />
    <summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/current_events/healthcare/october_2009/55_oppose_penalty_for_not_buying_health_insurance"&gt;According to a new Rasmussen survey&lt;/a&gt;, a majority of US voters oppose the provision in health care legislation that would require young and healthy Americans to either buy health
insurance or pay a $750 annual penalty for not having it. 55% of U.S. voters now oppose that proposal; just 32% of
voters think young and healthy Americans should be forced to purchase
health insurance or else pay a penalty.&amp;nbsp;14% are not
sure. Among voters ages 18 to 29, 29% favor the provision, known as &amp;ldquo;the individual mandate,&amp;rdquo; while 57% are opposed to it.&lt;/p&gt;</summary>
    <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/current_events/healthcare/october_2009/55_oppose_penalty_for_not_buying_health_insurance"&gt;According to a new Rasmussen survey&lt;/a&gt;, a majority of US voters oppose the provision in health care legislation that would require young and healthy Americans to either buy health
insurance or pay a $750 annual penalty for not having it. 55% of U.S. voters now oppose that proposal; just 32% of
voters think young and healthy Americans should be forced to purchase
health insurance or else pay a penalty.&amp;nbsp;14% are not
sure. Among voters ages 18 to 29, 29% favor the provision, known as &amp;ldquo;the individual mandate,&amp;rdquo; while 57% are opposed to it.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/polltrack/~4/XJIUqAAzgvI" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content>
  <feedburner:origLink>http://www.polltrack.com/post/1127</feedburner:origLink></entry>
</feed>
