<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.2" --><rss version="2.0">
    <channel>
        <title>Open Innovation Blog</title>
        <description />
        <link>http://open-innovation.net/</link>
        <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 14:18:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>FeedCreator 1.7.2</generator>
        <atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/openinnovationblog" /><feedburner:info xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" uri="openinnovationblog" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><item>
            <title>Finalizing my dissertation (download of my defensio presentation)</title>
            <link>http://open-innovation.net/blog/81-finalizing-my-dissertation-download-of-my-defensio-presentation.html</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<p>In the late 2000s researchers from all over the world published important research on various aspects of the open innovation concept. However, most of the work was of theoretical nature and the few available empirical papers were based on single-firm case studies. This was the reason why I focused on collecting a large-scale quantitative sample when I started my work with this dissertation in February 2008. During 2008 I began to narrow down my topic, define research questions and methodology. In early 2009 data collection was conducted over a period of around four months. The summer of 2009 was devoted to extensive data analysis and in fall and winter of 2009 the first paper was written. During 2010 another paper was written and submitted to a journal. Most of my working time during that year was devoted to the review process. In 2011 the first two articles were published, and work began on my third article which was finally published in 2012.</p>
<p>
Today, over more than four years after I first read Chesbroughs initial book from 2003, and after hundreds of research articles and books I read during my research work, the most important thing I learned is not the pure ‘open innovation’-knowledge from the books. What I really learned over the last years is the way of scientific thinking, especially from an epistemological and methodological point of view. Despite all expert knowledge, what you really need as a scientist is profundity, accuracy and conciseness. In case you want to publish papers, also patience, persistence, and continuity are of essential nature. This is where my dissertation has changed me most in the last four years.
</p>
<p>On June 19th, 2012 I held my Defensio Dissertationis - the final presentation of my thesis. I would like to <strong>share this presentation]]></description>
            <author>Alexander Schroll</author>
            <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2012 08:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
            <guid>http://open-innovation.net/blog/81-finalizing-my-dissertation-download-of-my-defensio-presentation.html</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Recent publications about open innovation adoption (by myself)</title>
            <link>http://open-innovation.net/blog/80-recent-publications-about-open-innovation-adoption-by-myself.html</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<p>Based on my research and data collection from 2008, the <em>European Journal of Innovation Management</em> and the <em>International Journal of Innovation and Regional Development</em> have recently published two articles of my work on <strong>Open Innovation Adoption</strong>:</p>
<ul>
<li>The first paper ("<a href="http://www.emeraldinsight.com/journals.htm?articleid=1954276" target="_blank">Open innovation modes and the role of internal R&D: An empirical study on open innovation adoption in Europe</a>") focuses on the adoption level in Europe in general, but also maps current adoption behaviours (outside-in, inside-out) on a 2x2-matrix and defines three clusters of open innovation adoption (closed, medium and open innovators).</li>
<li>The second paper ("<a href="http://www.inderscience.com/search/index.php?action=record&rec_id=42186" target="_blank">Determinants of open innovation: an empirical study on organisational, market, and human drivers of open innovation adoption across Europe</a>") focused on characteristics based in the industry (market), the company (organisational), and the company leaders (human) which are incluencing open innovation adoption. With our regression model we can predict open innovation usage (or variance of OI usage) with a relatively high R² of 0.380.</li>
</ul>
<p>If your university doesn't provide you access to these papers, please contact me and I may send you the PDF-articles.</p>
<p>Also upcoming: A <strong>state-of-the-art review article</strong> on empirical open innovation publications between 2003 and 2012, with a special focus on quantitative (large-scale) empirical literature on open innovation adoption, open innovation modes and adoption drivers. This study will compare 30 empirical papers and will be published in 2012 in the <a href="http://www.springer.com/business+%26+management/journal/11301" target="_blank">Journal für Betriebswirtschaft (JfB)</a> (Journal is partly in German, but article will be in English).</p>]]></description>
            <author>Alexander Schroll</author>
            <pubDate>Wed, 29 Feb 2012 09:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
            <guid>http://open-innovation.net/blog/80-recent-publications-about-open-innovation-adoption-by-myself.html</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>About the dispute between Open and User Innovation</title>
            <link>http://open-innovation.net/blog/79-about-the-dispute-between-open-and-user-innovation.html</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<p>If you are working or researching in the area of innovation, you will propably know <a target="_blank" href="http://web.mit.edu/evhippel/www/">Eric von Hippel</a> (MIT, Sloan School of Management) and <a target="_blank" href="http://www2.haas.berkeley.edu/Faculty/chesbrough_henry.aspx">Henry Chesbrough</a> (UC Berkeley). Both represent a stream in innovation research. Although, the scientific world should pull together, it is quite interesting to find both groups separating themselves from each other. This is true on individual level, but also on university level.</p>

<p><a href="http://open-innovation.net/blog/79-about-the-dispute-between-open-and-user-innovation.html">Read more...</a></p>]]></description>
            <author>Alexander Schroll</author>
            <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 15:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
            <guid>http://open-innovation.net/blog/79-about-the-dispute-between-open-and-user-innovation.html</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Open Innovation: A Future Research Outlook</title>
            <link>http://open-innovation.net/blog/78-open-innovation-a-future-research-outlook.html</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<p>Last week I participated in a two-day <strong>PhD Workshop at ESADE Business School</strong> in Barcelona with the two leading researchers on open innovation: <a target="_blank" href="http://www.haas.berkeley.edu/faculty/chesbrough.html"><strong>Henry Chesbrough</strong></a> (UC Berkeley) and <a target="_blank" href="http://wimvanhaverbeke.be/"><strong>Wim Vanhaverbeke</strong></a> (Hasselt University, Belgium). Over 20 PhD students working on open innovation or related fields participated in the workshop. Today, I would like to present the current state of research and future research perspectives as discussed at this workshop.</p>
<p> </p>

<p><a href="http://open-innovation.net/blog/78-open-innovation-a-future-research-outlook.html">Read more...</a></p>]]></description>
            <author>Alexander Schroll</author>
            <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 10:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
            <guid>http://open-innovation.net/blog/78-open-innovation-a-future-research-outlook.html</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Open Innovation in Politics</title>
            <link>http://open-innovation.net/blog/77-open-innovation-in-politics.html</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<img style="margin: 7px; float: left;" alt="Austrian student protests #unibrennt #unsereuni" src="http://open-innovation.net/images/stories/articles/uni-brennt1.jpg" width="253" height="168" />Because of current developments we are leaving the firm perspective for this blogpost in order to focus on application of the open innovation paradigm in other areas, like politics. Innovation does not only include product innovation, but also includes service innovation, process innovation and business innovation. Hence, also Government, Non-Government Organizations and Political Parties could successfully apply Open Innovation.  

<p><a href="http://open-innovation.net/blog/77-open-innovation-in-politics.html">Read more...</a></p>]]></description>
            <author>Alexander Schroll</author>
            <pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 17:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
            <guid>http://open-innovation.net/blog/77-open-innovation-in-politics.html</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>First results from the open innovation study</title>
            <link>http://open-innovation.net/blog/75-first-results-from-the-open-innovation-study.html</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
<meta name="ProgId" content="Word.Document" />
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 12" />
<meta name="Originator" content="Microsoft Word 12" />
<link rel="File-List" href="http://open-innovation.net/file:///C:\Users\Alex\AppData\Local\Temp\msohtmlclip1\01\clip_filelist.xml" />
<link rel="themeData" href="http://open-innovation.net/file:///C:\Users\Alex\AppData\Local\Temp\msohtmlclip1\01\clip_themedata.thmx" />
<link rel="colorSchemeMapping" href="http://open-innovation.net/file:///C:\Users\Alex\AppData\Local\Temp\msohtmlclip1\01\clip_colorschememapping.xml" />
<!--[if gte mso 9]><xml> <w:WordDocument> <w:View>Normal</w:View> <w:Zoom>0</w:Zoom> <w:TrackMoves /> <w:TrackFormatting /> <w:HyphenationZone>21</w:HyphenationZone> <w:PunctuationKerning /> <w:ValidateAgainstSchemas /> <w:SaveIfXMLInvalid>false</w:SaveIfXMLInvalid> <w:IgnoreMixedContent>false</w:IgnoreMixedContent> <w:AlwaysShowPlaceholderText>false</w:AlwaysShowPlaceholderText> <w:DoNotPromoteQF /> <w:LidThemeOther>DE-AT</w:LidThemeOther> <w:LidThemeAsian>X-NONE</w:LidThemeAsian> <w:LidThemeComplexScript>X-NONE</w:LidThemeComplexScript> <w:Compatibility> <w:BreakWrappedTables /> <w:SnapToGridInCell /> <w:WrapTextWithPunct /> <w:UseAsianBreakRules /> <w:DontGrowAutofit /> <w:SplitPgBreakAndParaMark /> <w:DontVertAlignCellWithSp /> <w:DontBreakConstrainedForcedTables /> <w:DontVertAlignInTxbx /> <w:Word11KerningPairs /> <w:CachedColBalance /> </w:Compatibility> <w:BrowserLevel>MicrosoftInternetExplorer4</w:BrowserLevel> <m:mathPr> <m:mathFont m:val="Cambria Math" /> <m:brkBin m:val="before" /> <m:brkBinSub m:val="&#45;-" /> <m:smallFrac m:val="off" /> <m:dispDef /> <m:lMargin m:val="0" /> <m:rMargin m:val="0" /> <m:defJc m:val="centerGroup" /> <m:wrapIndent m:val="1440" /> <m:intLim m:val="subSup" /> <m:naryLim m:val="undOvr" /> </m:mathPr></w:WordDocument> </xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml> <w:LatentStyles DefLockedState="false" DefUnhideWhenUsed="true"   DefSemiHidden="true" DefQFormat="false" DefPriority="99"   LatentStyleCount="267"> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="0" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Normal" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="9" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="heading 1" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="9" QFormat="true" Name="heading 2" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="9" QFormat="true" Name="heading 3" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="9" QFormat="true" Name="heading 4" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="9" QFormat="true" Name="heading 5" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="9" QFormat="true" Name="heading 6" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="9" QFormat="true" Name="heading 7" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="9" QFormat="true" Name="heading 8" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="9" QFormat="true" Name="heading 9" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" Name="toc 1" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" Name="toc 2" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" Name="toc 3" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" Name="toc 4" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" Name="toc 5" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" Name="toc 6" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" Name="toc 7" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" Name="toc 8" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" Name="toc 9" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="35" QFormat="true" Name="caption" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="10" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Title" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="1" Name="Default Paragraph Font" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="11" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Subtitle" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="22" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Strong" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="20" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Emphasis" />
<p><a href="http://open-innovation.net/blog/75-first-results-from-the-open-innovation-study.html">Read more...</a></p>]]></description>
            <author>Alexander Schroll</author>
            <pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 12:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
            <guid>http://open-innovation.net/blog/75-first-results-from-the-open-innovation-study.html</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Wrapping up the ISPIM conference on &amp;quot;The Future of Innovation&amp;quot;</title>
            <link>http://open-innovation.net/blog/74-wrapping-up-the-ispim-conference-on-qthe-future-of-innovationq.html</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<p>This year's ISPIM conference was held in Vienna from June 22 till June 24. Over 200 papers were presented, with tracks focusing on Open Innovation, Service Innovation, Business Model Innovation, Innovation Policy, or Innovation Networks (to name just a few of them).</p>
<p>Here is a short summary of some presentations:</p>

<p><a href="http://open-innovation.net/blog/74-wrapping-up-the-ispim-conference-on-qthe-future-of-innovationq.html">Read more...</a></p>]]></description>
            <author>Alexander Schroll</author>
            <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 09:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
            <guid>http://open-innovation.net/blog/74-wrapping-up-the-ispim-conference-on-qthe-future-of-innovationq.html</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Retrospect: The seventh user and open innovation workshop</title>
            <link>http://open-innovation.net/blog/73-retrospect-the-seventh-user-and-open-innovation-workshop.html</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<p>There were 110 registered for the workshop, and I assume that there were around 95 really present at the workshop (at least one of the three days). The participation list was impressive and the most important researchers in the field of user innovation where there: Eric von Hippel (MIT), Joel West (San Jose State), Frank Piller (RWTH Aachen), Nikolaus Franke (WU Vienna), Georg von Krogh (ETH Zürich), Cornelius Herstatt (TUHH) and a lot of other professors, post-docs, and PhD students.</p>
<p>As already <a href="http://blog.openinnovation.net/2009/06/scratching-itch.html">Joel West</a> mentioned, Eric von Hippel seems to be the godfather of the user innovation research community. And this is not only Joel's or my opinion - many other participants think the same. In most of the presentations, but also in the pauses between, the presenters closely watched the reaction of Eric and waited for his approval to their work.</p>

<p><a href="http://open-innovation.net/blog/73-retrospect-the-seventh-user-and-open-innovation-workshop.html">Read more...</a></p>]]></description>
            <author>Alexander Schroll</author>
            <pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2009 06:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
            <guid>http://open-innovation.net/blog/73-retrospect-the-seventh-user-and-open-innovation-workshop.html</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>E-Novation: Empirical study on the use of web-based tools for open innovation</title>
            <link>http://open-innovation.net/blog/72-e-novation-empirical-study-on-the-use-of-web-based-tools-for-open-innovation.html</link>
            <description><![CDATA[The term E-Novation was created by the research team of <a target="_blank" href="http://www.enovationmatters.com/">enovationmatters.com</a>, which consists of <a target="_blank" href="http://twitter.com/eehsani">Ehsan Ehsani</a>, Hazhir Rahmandad, Robert Shelton and also Frank Piller. They recently published some results of their<strong> first E-novation study</strong> regarding the use of <strong>collaborative web-based tools for innovation and product development</strong>.
<p>Personally, I am not a fan of this new creation of "E-Novation". I think it refers to much to the late 90s with all its E-Commerce etc. Additionally, I don't think we need another term for web-based innovation tools. But anyway, it highly appreciate their empirical approach. Nowadays, too much theories about innovation in general are build without any empirical evidence. Hence, we are in desperate need of <strong>empirical studies which can prove our theories and concepts</strong>.</p>
<p>In the end, they collected a <strong>worldwide sample of 203 companies</strong> (main focus nordic countries and US) with no specific industry focus (also service companies were included).</p>

<p><a href="http://open-innovation.net/blog/72-e-novation-empirical-study-on-the-use-of-web-based-tools-for-open-innovation.html">Read more...</a></p>]]></description>
            <author>Alexander Schroll</author>
            <pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 15:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
            <guid>http://open-innovation.net/blog/72-e-novation-empirical-study-on-the-use-of-web-based-tools-for-open-innovation.html</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Is Open Innovation hyped by blogs or social media?</title>
            <link>http://open-innovation.net/blog/71-is-open-innovation-hyped-by-blogs-or-social-media.html</link>
            <description><![CDATA[Dear readers,
<p>i'm sorry for my absence in the last six weeks. I was working on several projects and especially data collection for my open innovation research project kept me busy 24x7. Anyway, today we will take a look on what previously happened in the world of open innovation. Not only in the last six weeks, but from 2006.</p>
<p>As I already wrote in some of my previous posts, the term open innovation is increasingly hyped by social and also classic media. Blogs around the topic of open innovation and crowdsourcing are continuously popping up. My Twitter RSS-feed about open-innovation related tweets already has 650 unread items for the last weeks. And not only bloggers but also academic researchers and practitioners are entering the world of innovation as the provisional programme of the ISPIM conference 2009 shows: The conference topic is "The Future of Innovation" and as we can see from the provisional programme, 21 presentations are solely focussed on "open innovation"!</p>
<p>Based on this overflow of interest I ask you if Open Innovation is the future, or if it is just hyped? Let's take an aggregated look at the rise of popularity from 2006 till May 2009:</p>

<p><a href="http://open-innovation.net/blog/71-is-open-innovation-hyped-by-blogs-or-social-media.html">Read more...</a></p>]]></description>
            <author>Alexander Schroll</author>
            <pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 07:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
            <guid>http://open-innovation.net/blog/71-is-open-innovation-hyped-by-blogs-or-social-media.html</guid>
        </item>
    </channel>
</rss>
