<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">

<channel>
	<title>New York Entertainment Lawyer | The Law Offices of Vince Manapat</title>
	
	<link>http://www.vincemanapat.com</link>
	<description>New York Entertainment and Small Business Law Including LLCs, Securities, Contracts, and Intellectual Property</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 May 2010 20:07:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
		<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/nycartlaw" /><feedburner:info uri="nycartlaw" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><item>
		<title>Suing is Not Always As Easy As It Seems</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/nycartlaw/~3/wKKP4b8-ijs/675</link>
		<comments>http://www.vincemanapat.com/index.php/archives/675#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 May 2010 15:35:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vincemanapat.com/?p=675</guid>
		<description>People rarely understand how costly, time consuming, and grueling a lawsuit can be. In a sense, being right is not enough. Earlier this month, the U.S. Copyright Group partnered with some independent studios to sue thousands of file-sharers. But Time-Warner is resisting the lawsuits because of the unreasonable burden the suits place on the ISP. [...]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/nycartlaw/~4/wKKP4b8-ijs" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.vincemanapat.com/index.php/archives/675/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.vincemanapat.com/index.php/archives/675</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Navigating the Complexities of Termination Rights</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/nycartlaw/~3/rvIwGPz3lik/670</link>
		<comments>http://www.vincemanapat.com/index.php/archives/670#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 May 2010 18:26:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vincemanapat.com/?p=670</guid>
		<description>I&amp;#8217;ve written about termination rights in the past with respect to John Steinbeck&amp;#8217;s works. The issue of termination rights is a complex one, but Shourin Sen at Exclusive Rights has made the subject much simpler with his &amp;#8220;Copyright Termination Calculator.&amp;#8221; According to Sen, &amp;#8220;The calculator will run a user through the questions and permutations necessary [...]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/nycartlaw/~4/rvIwGPz3lik" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.vincemanapat.com/index.php/archives/670/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.vincemanapat.com/index.php/archives/670</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>2nd Circuit’s Salinger v Colting Decision</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/nycartlaw/~3/r7Xq4DBhMVA/667</link>
		<comments>http://www.vincemanapat.com/index.php/archives/667#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 May 2010 15:19:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vincemanapat.com/?p=667</guid>
		<description>The Second Circuit remanded the Salinger v. Colting case, holding that: eBay abrogated parts of this Court&amp;#8217;s preliminary injunction standard in copyright cases, and accordingly, this case must be remanded to the District Court to reevaluate Salinger&amp;#8217;s preliminary injunction motion. In light of that holding, we need not decide whether the preliminary injunction issued by [...]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/nycartlaw/~4/r7Xq4DBhMVA" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.vincemanapat.com/index.php/archives/667/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.vincemanapat.com/index.php/archives/667</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Sam Moore Lawsuit Against Weinstein Company Will Go to Trial</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/nycartlaw/~3/kAg1mX9EYkE/657</link>
		<comments>http://www.vincemanapat.com/index.php/archives/657#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 May 2010 23:43:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vincemanapat.com/?p=657</guid>
		<description>In late 2008, Sam Moore sued the Weinstein Company over the production of its film &amp;#8220;Soul Men.&amp;#8221; The premise of the film is that &amp;#8220;two estranged soul-singing legends agree to participate in a reunion performance at the Apollo Theater.&amp;#8221; One of the &amp;#8220;soul-singing&amp;#8221; legends happened to resemble &amp;#8220;Sam &amp;#38; Dave,&amp;#8221; an R&amp;#38;B group to which [...]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/nycartlaw/~4/kAg1mX9EYkE" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.vincemanapat.com/index.php/archives/657/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.vincemanapat.com/index.php/archives/657</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>The Net Profit Pitfall</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/nycartlaw/~3/3t3bilcG6_k/639</link>
		<comments>http://www.vincemanapat.com/index.php/archives/639#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Apr 2010 13:35:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Film]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vincemanapat.com/?p=639</guid>
		<description>Net profit definitions are notorious in the film industry. In on of the most egregious examples, the film Forrest Gump, which is the fourth highest grossing film in history, never turned a &amp;#8220;net profit.&amp;#8221; It seems that problems relating to net profit definitions are still coming up. THR is reporting that Marathon Funding, a company [...]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/nycartlaw/~4/3t3bilcG6_k" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.vincemanapat.com/index.php/archives/639/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.vincemanapat.com/index.php/archives/639</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>The Economist on Copyright Protection</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/nycartlaw/~3/gkeO1gLGxM8/635</link>
		<comments>http://www.vincemanapat.com/index.php/archives/635#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2010 15:19:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vincemanapat.com/?p=635</guid>
		<description>There is an interesting article in The Economist concerning attempts to strengthen copyright protection. The article makes some good points about the arguments for increased protection. For instance, &amp;#8220;The notion that lengthening copyright increases creativity is questionable, however. Authors and artists do not generally consult the statute books before deciding whether or not to pick [...]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/nycartlaw/~4/gkeO1gLGxM8" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.vincemanapat.com/index.php/archives/635/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.vincemanapat.com/index.php/archives/635</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Contract Review By a Computer Program</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/nycartlaw/~3/fNEqTrwq4zA/629</link>
		<comments>http://www.vincemanapat.com/index.php/archives/629#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2010 12:53:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology and Information]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vincemanapat.com/?p=629</guid>
		<description>Will computers replace lawyers one day? I doubt it, but some are already taking steps in that direction. JavaCoolSoftware has released the &amp;#8220;,&amp;#8221; a program that will &amp;#8220;analyze license agreements in seconds, and provide a detailed listing of potentially interesting words and phrases.&amp;#8221; Obviously, this is not a full proof method for avoiding license agreements [...]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/nycartlaw/~4/fNEqTrwq4zA" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.vincemanapat.com/index.php/archives/629/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.vincemanapat.com/index.php/archives/629</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Entertainment Industry Aspirations</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/nycartlaw/~3/EtXd9A2C18E/627</link>
		<comments>http://www.vincemanapat.com/index.php/archives/627#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Apr 2010 17:20:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vincemanapat.com/?p=627</guid>
		<description>Earlier this year Victoria A. Espinel, the government&amp;#8217;s Intellectual Property Enforcement Coordinator, requested submissions from the public concerning the future of intellectual property enforecement in the United States. The MPAA and RIAA submitted a brief that is remarkable in its breadth. According to Zero Paid: Its outline for tackling the problem is truly frightening, and [...]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/nycartlaw/~4/EtXd9A2C18E" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.vincemanapat.com/index.php/archives/627/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.vincemanapat.com/index.php/archives/627</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Disney Characters Explain Copyright</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/nycartlaw/~3/JYMPN4O1mmM/618</link>
		<comments>http://www.vincemanapat.com/index.php/archives/618#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Apr 2010 13:03:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vincemanapat.com/?p=618</guid>
		<description>Via the Licensing Plate &amp;#8212; a short video wherein a number of famous Disney characters explain the intricacies of copyright law.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/nycartlaw/~4/JYMPN4O1mmM" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.vincemanapat.com/index.php/archives/618/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.vincemanapat.com/index.php/archives/618</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Current Copyright Disputes</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/nycartlaw/~3/DKjk95wOz8w/614</link>
		<comments>http://www.vincemanapat.com/index.php/archives/614#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Mar 2010 18:59:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vincemanapat.com/?p=614</guid>
		<description>The Copyright Wars continue to be fought in all fronts. Here is a sampling of some current disputes: (1) Artist Dereck Seltzer has sued the band Green Day for copyright infringement claiming that Green Day used one of Seltzer&amp;#8217;s images in their live show without a license. Examiner. (2) Robert Cabell, the owner of a [...]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/nycartlaw/~4/DKjk95wOz8w" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.vincemanapat.com/index.php/archives/614/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.vincemanapat.com/index.php/archives/614</feedburner:origLink></item>
	</channel>
</rss>
