When revenue targets are missed, the postmortem tends to follow a familiar script. The pipeline was light. The close rate slipped. Deals pushed. Sales didn’t execute. The prescribed remedy varies, but it usually involves some combination of more training, a new methodology, tighter inspection, some version of the “Harder, Faster, Longer, Louder” school of sales management, or—when patience finally runs out—a new sales leader.

Sometimes those are exactly the right responses. Sometimes the sales organization genuinely is the problem. And often it starts at the top. But more often than people want to admit, Sales is where the pressure is felt, not necessarily where the problem originated. Revenue targets are missed for all kinds of reasons that have nothing to do with what sellers did or didn’t do in front of a buyer. To be clear, I’m not saying Sales isn’t accountable or doesn’t mismanage opportunities. I’m saying that they’re not alone.

 The products weren’t positioned well for the market (product–market fit). Demand generation was generating quantity over quality. New hires weren’t ramped effectively because onboarding was built around an SME parade of presentations rather than actual skill development. Customer success was quietly losing the revenue the sales team fought to win (and sometimes because Sales over-promised). Operations was creating friction the sales force had to absorb without any structural authority to fix.

Blaming Sales when the commercial system is misaligned is like blaming the point of the spear for the throw.

This post introduces my Commercial Effectiveness Framework (CEF)—an architecture that extends the building-block logic I developed for The Building Blocks of Sales Enablement across every major commercial function. For senior leaders who have spent years watching sales improvement initiatives under-perform despite real investment, the CEF offers a different starting point: a whole-system view of where commercial performance is actually being won or lost.

The Architecture Behind the Building Blocks

When I wrote The Building Blocks of Sales Enablement, the core argument was this: effective sales enablement isn’t a handful of activities—it’s a system. One that requires specific elements working in coordination, each well-designed and well-executed, and all of them connected.

The whole is greater than the sum of its parts. 

 The framework organized those elements into 12 building blocks arranged in a visual architecture, supported by three foundational blocks. The blocks represent the functional elements—or performance levers—that must be in place, and in good shape, for a sales force to perform at its highest possible level. They are:

• Buyer Acumen, Buyer Engagement Content, and Sales Support Content comprise the top row.
• The second row includes Sales Hiring, Sales Training, and Sales Coaching.
• The third row includes Sales Process, Sales Methodology, and Sales Analytics and Metrics.
• The bottom row includes Sales Technology and Tools, Sales Compensation and Recognition, and Sales Manager Enablement.
• Those 12 core blocks are held together by three others: Systems Thinking, Communication Management (with the sales force and cross-functional collaborators), and optional Sales Support Services.

Systems Thinking and Communication Management aren’t optional. They’re the reason the 12 blocks can function as a system rather than a stack of independent initiatives. Think of the 12 core blocks as the performance levers you can push and pull on to improve sales performance, and the systems thinking and cross-functional collaboration as the way those core blocks get executed. Without systems thinking, you end up with well-designed blocks that don’t connect. Without cross-functional collaboration, you get well-intentioned silos. The support services layer is optional, based on needs of the sales force (RFPs, overlay/SME/sales engineer support, coaching services, and more, often with SLAs), but when needed, the operational infrastructure helps keep the sales force moving forward.

The framework was deliberately designed to be used as a diagnostic, as well. It’s a structured way to assess where a sales enablement function is strong, where it’s weak, and where gaps are costing performance. It works because the architecture reflects how organizations actually operate, not how we wish they did.

What I’ve come to see over years of applying and teaching this model is that the same logic that makes the Building Blocks framework work for Sales Enablement is the same logic that needs to be applied to every commercial function around it. Because the problem isn’t just that Sales Enablement isn’t always built well. The problem is that the entire commercial system is rarely built well—and almost never built with a shared architecture in mind.

One Architecture. Five Functions.

The Commercial Effectiveness Framework is what happens when you apply building-block thinking at commercial scale.

Think of the Sales Enablement building blocks as a single molecule—a coherent structure where the elements are defined, connected, and purposeful. The CEF is the next level up. It’s what you get when multiple molecules, each one a set of function-specific building blocks, are assembled into a larger integrated structure. Like the way atoms combine into molecules and molecules combine into something more complex, each function in the CEF has its own complete set of building blocks, and all five sets come together to form the commercial system.

The architecture is consistent. The elements vary by function. And every function includes the same three foundational blocks: Systems Thinking, Communication Management, and Functional Support Services (as needed).

That consistency is not cosmetic. It’s the point.

The five functions are:

• Product Enablement
• Marketing Enablement
• Sales Enablement (or Revenue Enablement)
• Sales Operations (or Revenue Operations)
• Customer Success Enablement

Each has its own 12 building blocks tailored to the specific work that function does. They all share Systems Thinking, Cross-Functional Collaboration/Communication, and the optional Sales Support Services. Sales (or Revenue) Enablement’s Communication Management block combines Cross-Functional Collaboration/Communication with Sales Force Communication, since they typically should be the one communication channel with the sales force. Together these functions form a complete commercial system—one that can be assessed, diagnosed, executed, measured, and improved as a whole.

The CEF framework visual shows all five function frameworks alongside each other, which makes the structural pattern immediately visible. But you don’t need to see the visual to work with the concept. Let’s start with the element that sits at the center of the entire system.

Market Acumen: The Center That Holds the System Together

Before walking through each function’s building blocks, one architectural element deserves its own treatment: Market Acumen.

In the CEF visual, Market Acumen sits at the center of the entire commercial system—not assigned to any single function, but as the hub every function orbits. That placement is intentional. Every commercial function depends on a shared, accurate, continuously updated understanding of the market: who buyers are, what they need, what competitors are doing, how conditions are shifting, and what signals from customers should be influencing how the commercial system operates.

This is a broader construct than Buyer Acumen, which is one of the 12 building blocks of Sales Enablement specifically. Buyer Acumen in the Sales Enablement context is the deep, structured understanding of buyer roles, challenges, objectives, and buying processes that sellers need to engage effectively in a sales conversation.

 At the commercial system level, Market Acumen encompasses that and goes further. It includes how Product understands product-market fit and evolving customer needs. How Marketing reads demand signals and competitive positioning. How Customer Success captures post-sale intelligence that feeds back into product and go-to-market decisions. How Sales Operations interprets market dynamics when designing territories, modeling quotas, and structuring the sales org.

 When Market Acumen is weak or siloed—when functions operate from different versions of market reality—the commercial system fragments: Product builds to solve problems the ICP doesn’t have. Marketing produces content that doesn’t address what key buyer personas need to know to move forward. Customer Success struggles to manage and retain accounts that were oversold. The center doesn’t hold. 

When Market Acumen is strong and genuinely shared across functions, it becomes a multiplier. It aligns the commercial system around a common understanding of the customer and competitive environment—the foundation on which every other building block performs better.

The Five Functions and Their Building Blocks

Product Enablement

Product Enablement is probably the most under-examined link in the commercial chain. When products don’t win in the market, the response is usually a messaging fix or a sales training refresh—both downstream interventions that treat symptoms rather than causes. There are limits to what sales enablement can fix.

The Building Blocks of Product Enablement reflect the full scope of what it takes for a product organization to drive commercial success: Market Acumen, Product Design (Market Fit), Product Development, Product Pricing, Product Launch, Product Management, Project Management, Advisory Board Management, Product Analytics, Training, Coaching, and Technology and Tools.

Market Acumen as a Product building block forces a hard question: how systematically does your product organization stay connected to what the market actually needs, as opposed to what it needed 18 months ago when the roadmap was set? How compelling are the problems that the products are designed to fix for your ICP?

 Product Launch is another instructive example. It’s a building block, not an event. Launches that arrive without adequate internal enablement for Sales, without aligned messaging, without sequenced training, consistently under-perform. That’s a product building block problem showing up downstream as a sales result.

Marketing Enablement

Marketing’s building blocks span the full scope of how demand is created and how sellers are prepared to engage meaningfully with buyers and support their decision. The 12 blocks are: Demand Generation, Messaging and Presentations, Content Marketing, Social Media, Event Marketing, Website and SEO, Email Marketing, Campaign Management, Marketing Technology and Tools, Buyer Personas, Marketing Analytics, and Advertising and SEM.

Buyer Personas is worth calling out specifically. When personas are shallow—built from internal assumptions rather than research, or treated as a one-time exercise rather than a living asset—the downstream effects spread across almost every other block. Messaging misaligns. Content misses. Campaigns attract the wrong ICP. The sales force wastes time on unqualified leads and then gets blamed for conversion rates. As a result, buyer engagement content, which is meant to support buying decisions and meet stage exit criteria, misses the mark.

Note, too, that Messaging and Presentations is an explicit building block within Marketing Enablement. This is the foundation for how sellers communicate value through content and leave-behind materials, to support the buying decisions when they’re not in the room. When this block is weak, no amount of sales skills training fully closes the gap. Buyers often make purchase decisions without a seller in the room. When the content they’re reviewing doesn’t answer the right questions, in the right way, for the right persona, at the right stage, deals stall or die quietly.

Sales Enablement

The Sales Enablement building blocks within the CEF are the same 12 that formed the original framework.

• Core Blocks: Buyer Acumen, Buyer Engagement Content, Sales Support Content, Sales Hiring, Sales Training, Sales Coaching, Sales Process, Sales Methodology, Sales Analytics and Metrics, Sales Technology and Tools, Sales Compensation and Recognition, and Sales Manager Enablement.
• Supporting Blocks: Systems Thinking, Communication Management, and Sales Support Services

If you know the original Building Blocks framework, these will be familiar. What’s different in the CEF context is the perspective. Sales Enablement doesn’t sit at the center of the commercial system—it sits within it. When the Product and Marketing blocks upstream are poorly built, Sales Enablement absorbs the cost. When Sales Operations and Customer Success downstream are poorly built, Sales Enablement can’t compensate for it.

That’s a structural reality, not a criticism of any individual function. Good Sales Enablement leaders already know this from experience. The CEF now gives them a shared language and a concrete architecture to make it visible to the leaders who can act on it.

Sales Operations

Sales or Revenue Operations exists in most commercial organizations, but the function’s scope varies enormously. Some teams own the full set of operations building blocks and, in organizations where Sales Enablement reports into Sales Ops, the enablement building blocks as well. Others leave critical ones like territory design, quota management, and sales process optimization either unassigned or under-built. Not because the people aren’t capable, but because the function is often chartered too narrowly, under-resourced, or scoped around reporting and CRM administration rather than the operational backbone it needs to be.

The 12 Building Blocks of Sales Operations: Sales Reporting, Territory Optimization, Account Assignments, Sales Compensation and Recognition, Sales Analytics and Metrics, Sales Model, Sales Quota Management, CRM and Sales Technology, Sales Management Operating System, Sales Org Structure, Forecast Management, and Sales Process Optimization.

Readers familiar with the Sales Enablement framework will notice that a few blocks appear in both: Sales Compensation and Recognition, Sales Analytics and Metrics, and Sales Process Optimization. That’s not a mistake. These are genuinely shared responsibilities that require coordination between both functions. If Sales Ops designs a comp plan without understanding the behaviors Sales Enablement is trying to reinforce, the two work against each other. If the CRM isn’t configured to support the sales process and methodology, adoption suffers, and no amount of training fixes a broken tool.

When Sales Ops and Sales Enablement aren’t aligned on these shared blocks, sellers pay the price. Forecasts miss. CRM adoption stalls. Reps get conflicting signals from their comp plan and their coaching. And all of it gets labeled a sales performance problem, because that’s where the number lives.

One block deserves a specific callout: the Sales Management Operating System, or smOS. This is the management cadence, operating rhythm, and structured practices that allow managers to actually lead, inspect, coach, reinforce, and develop their teams consistently. Without a well-designed smOS, everything else upstream is at risk. You can build excellent training, great content, and solid process, and watch it fade without consistent reinforcement. The smOS is what makes adoption stick at scale.

Note that the smOS is a block in the Sales Ops framework, but is also part of the Sales Management System, which is one of the systems supported by Sales Enablement. Sales Ops owns the decisions in the smOS—what are the management activities and the cadence for each; what are the team and individual meetings and the cadence for each, etc. Sales Enablement then owns the training and support for managers to execute the elements in the system. This is how systems thinking works. Elements are interrelated and interconnected. Like the shared blocks discussed earlier in this section, the smOS is another block and system that requires cross-functional alignment and collaboration.

Customer Success Enablement

Customer Success Enablement completes the commercial system—and in many organizations, it’s where significant revenue is quietly lost. Retention failures, expansion misses, and preventable churn events don’t usually trace back to a single cause. They trace back to weak building blocks.

The 12 Building Blocks of Customer Success Enablement: Employee Engagement, Service Delivery, Process Optimization, Service Analytics, Feedback Management, Product Knowledge, Tools and Technology, Training, Sales Support, Customer Acumen, Coaching, and Project Management.

Customer Acumen is the mirror image of Buyer Acumen on the sales side—a structured, disciplined approach to understanding customers deeply: their business challenges, their internal dynamics, their evolving success criteria, and the risks that could drive them toward a competitor or out of the relationship entirely. Without strong Customer Acumen, Customer Success teams tend to be reactive. They’re often excellent at managing the account they have; they’re less effective at seeing risk or opportunity before it arrives.

The Sales Support block also deserves attention. CS teams carry a lot of knowledge about what customers actually need post-sale—context that, if systematically fed back to Sales and Marketing, could sharpen messaging, improve positioning, and reduce the kind of churn that starts on day two of a new engagement. When that feedback loop is broken, the commercial system loses intelligence it can’t afford to lose.

The Connective Tissue: Systems Thinking at Commercial Scale

Every one of the five function-specific frameworks shares the same foundational structure: 12 building blocks across the top, supported by Systems Thinking, Communication Management (with Cross-Functional Collaboration), and Functional Support Services at the base.

That consistent foundation is what transforms five independent frameworks into one integrated system.

Systems thinking, as I apply it, is the discipline of understanding how the elements of a complex system interrelate—how changing one element affects others, how feedback loops operate, where leverage points exist, and where well-intentioned interventions might create unintended consequences elsewhere. John Kotter described this best when he wrote that change management is like an office where every item is connected by string. Move the lamp, and it shifts the stapler. Pick up the phone and it opens a drawer. It’s funny to envision but makes a great point. In the original Sales Enablement framework, systems thinking is what prevents leaders from optimizing a single block while inadvertently degrading the ones adjacent to it.

At commercial scale, that discipline matters more, not less. Five functions. Sixty-plus building blocks across them. Multiple handoffs, dependencies, and feedback loops between them. Without systems thinking as a foundational discipline (and someone paying attention to the interactions), commercial improvement efforts can devolve into functional optimization that produces local wins at the expense of system-wide performance. (Can you spell “silos?”)

Cross-Functional Collaboration (part of Communication Management, along with communication to the sales force) is the mechanism by which systems thinking becomes operational. The CEF doesn’t work if each function builds its blocks in isolation and then hopes for alignment downstream. Product needs to collaborate with Marketing on positioning and launch readiness. Marketing needs to collaborate with Sales on messaging and lead quality definitions. Sales needs to collaborate with Operations on quota design, territory structure, and technology adoption. Customer Success needs to close the loop back to Product, Marketing, and Sales with what’s actually happening after the contract is signed.  Alignment is like grease—a lubricant. And if you’ll pardon the mixed metaphor, it’s what turns individual oar strokes into thrust when six oarsmen row in unison, in the same direction.

None of this is a new idea. But having a shared architectural framework—one that each function can point to and say, “Here are our blocks, here’s where they connect to yours”—makes those conversations more structured and less political.

Functional Support Services, the third foundational row, acknowledges that each function requires specific operational and administrative support to do the work at all. It’s not glamorous, but under-resourcing it is expensive.

From Framework to Plan: Developing a Commercial Effectiveness Plan

A framework without a development process is just a picture. The CEF includes a structured approach to turning the architecture into an actionable plan that actually drives commercial improvement.

The process flows from people and data inputs, through a design and analysis sequence, to a Commercial Effectiveness Plan as the final output.

It starts with Bricks in the Wall—identifying Charter Partners. These are the leaders across the five commercial functions (and any other stakeholders that should be included) who need to be part of building the plan. Charters fail when they’re designed in a room with too few of the right people, or when the people in the room don’t have the authority to commit their functions. Getting the right charter partners engaged early is the prerequisite for everything that follows.

With Charter Partners identified, the Commercial Effectiveness Charter Design process begins. This establishes how the work will be defined, owned, and measured—producing an Aligned Charter as the first interim output. Consider using RACI / RASCI to define roles and ownership.

A charter isn’t a strategy deck. It’s an operational agreement about scope, ownership, accountabilities, and success criteria. Without it, even well-designed building block improvements will be contested, underfunded, or quietly deprioritized when the next initiative comes along.

Running in parallel are two essential inputs: a Sales Force Situation Assessment and a structured review of Data, Metrics, and KPIs. These aren’t audits for their own sake. They feed the subsequent analysis, and together they produce a clear picture of Impacts, Needs, Outcomes, and Priorities—the diagnostic layer that keeps the plan grounded in reality rather than executive aspiration.

Next comes the Building Blocks Gaps Analysis—a systematic assessment of each function’s 12 blocks against current state. Where are the blocks strong? Where are they weak? Where are they GEFN (Good Enough For Now, with future improvement to come later)? What’s missing entirely and needed? Where is the gap between current state and required state large enough to represent a meaningful drag on performance? The interim output is a set of Prioritized Gaps to Close to Deliver Prioritized Outcomes. Note the phrasing: not a list of things that could be better, but gaps explicitly connected to the outcomes the organization needs to achieve. That linkage is what keeps the plan from becoming a wish list, or that horrible state where nothing is a priority because everything is a priority.

The Force Field Analysis adds the final layer of diagnostic rigor. For each prioritized gap, it surfaces the factors—structural, cultural, resource-related, or otherwise—that will support or resist the change required to close it. The interim output is an Analysis of Factors to Address to Achieve Outcomes. Leaders who skip this step produce plans that look solid on paper and stall in execution, often in predictable ways that a good force field analysis would have surfaced upfront.

All of this feeds the Commercial Effectiveness Plan—the final output that translates the diagnostic work into a structured, prioritized roadmap for building out the commercial system.

The planning process reflects the same discipline as the framework itself: start with the right people, get aligned on scope and success criteria, diagnose honestly, prioritize rigorously, and build a plan that addresses the factors that would otherwise undermine it.

Using the CEF as a Diagnostic Starting Point

If your revenue performance isn’t where it needs to be, the CEF offers a starting point that most commercial improvement efforts skip: an honest, function-by-function assessment of your commercial system and how well it’s aligned.

Not, “What’s going wrong in Sales?” but, “Across all five functions, which building blocks are genuinely strong or GEFN, which are missing entirely, which are weak, and where are the gaps most likely to be costing us performance?”

That question surfaces a different kind of conversation. It shifts the frame from blame to diagnosis. It makes it possible to prioritize interventions that address root causes rather than symptoms. And it gives every commercial function a shared language for talking about their own work and the dependencies between them.

You don’t need to complete a full formal gaps analysis to start. You can use the five function frameworks as a structured assessment—walking through each block, asking whether it exists, whether it’s well-designed, and whether it’s actually being used effectively. Even a rough review reveals patterns. You might find:

• Functions where one or two blocks are excellent and the surrounding infrastructure is absent.
• Blocks that every function claims to own but no one is actually building.
•  Critical dependencies that no one is actively managing.

That’s where commercial effectiveness work begins: not with a plan first, but with an honest picture of what’s actually in place and how well it’s working. If you’re familiar with my process for developing a sales enablement plan that delivers results, it’s the same process extended across the functions. Always diagnose before prescribing.

Start with a cross-functional review. Bring representatives from Product, Marketing, Sales, Sales Operations, and Customer Success into the room, along with any other relevant stakeholders. Walk through each function’s building blocks. Rate each one. Note the handoffs and dependencies. Within a few hours, you’ll have a clearer picture of your commercial system than most organizations ever do.

Then prioritize ruthlessly—not based on what’s easiest to fix, but based on what’s most likely to move the metrics that matter most.

Closing Thoughts

While The Building Blocks of Sales Enablement included some intentional overlap with Sales/Rev Ops and HR—such as compensation and the Sales Management Operating System—it was, at its core, a book about systems thinking applied to one commercial function: Sales Enablement.

The Commercial Effectiveness Framework is what happens when that same thinking scales across the whole system. Proponents of the expanded Revenue Enablement have broadened the concept of Sales Enablement a bit, but not enough.

Revenue under-performance isn’t just a Sales problem. It’s a commercial system problem—and commercial system problems don’t respond to function-specific fixes applied in isolation.

Five functions. Five sets of building blocks. One shared architecture, three consistent foundational blocks, and a development process designed to turn the framework into an actionable plan.

If you’ve ever felt the frustration of watching well-designed sales initiatives fail to move the needle—and suspected the cause was somewhere upstream or downstream of Sales—the CEF is the framework that makes the whole picture visible. As good as it is, there are limits to what Sales Enablement can fix.

Multiple molecules, one coherent structure. When every function’s building blocks are strong, well-connected, and grounded in systems thinking and cross-functional collaboration, the whole becomes greater than the sum of its parts.

That’s what commercial effectiveness looks like. And it’s achievable—but only if you’re willing to look at the whole system.

Resources and Further Reading

For readers who want to further explore the architecture behind the Commercial Effectiveness Framework and its roots:

• Download The Building Blocks Meet the Commercial Effectiveness Framework slide deck.
• The Building Blocks of Sales Enablement — available at Amazon, td.org/books, or wherever business books are sold.
• “Considerations for Implementing Revenue Enablement/Commercial Effectiveness:” https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/considerations-implementing-revenue-enablement-mike-kunkle-rezke/

How to Follow My Work

• Read more articles and resources at MikeKunkle.com
• Subscribe to my Sales Enablement Straight Talk newsletter on LinkedIn
• Connect with me on LinkedIn
• Get the book: The Building Blocks of Sales Enablement

About Mike Kunkle

Mike Kunkle is a sales effectiveness and sales enablement expert, speaker, and author with more than three decades of experience helping organizations improve commercial performance through disciplined, systems-based approaches. He’s the founder of Transforming Sales Results, LLC—a thought-leadership, research, and publishing platform focused on sales enablement, sales management, and commercial effectiveness—and the author of The Building Blocks of Sales Enablement. His forthcoming book, The CoNavigator Method for B2B Sales Mastery, is expected in 2026. He publishes the Sales Enablement Straight Talk newsletter on LinkedIn and writes regularly here at MikeKunkle.com.

The post It’s Not Just a Sales Problem: How the Building Blocks Architecture Scales Across the Commercial System appeared first on MikeKunkle.com.

A young executive was leaving the office late one evening when he found the CEO standing in front of a shredder with a piece of paper in his hand.

“Listen,” the CEO said, “this is a very sensitive and important document, and my assistant has gone for the night. Can you make this thing work for me?”

“Certainly,” said the young executive. He turned the machine on, inserted the paper, and pressed the start button.

“Excellent, excellent!” said the CEO, as his paper disappeared inside the shredder. “I just need one copy…”

Okay, so what made that funny? You thought it was going in one direction—and at the last moment, it went another way entirely. The surprise is the punch line, and the punch line is what lands. Comedians call it the “left turn.”

This left turn is also one of the most underused approaches in insight-based selling. And if you understand how to build it intentionally—grounded in real data and connected to your solutions—you can influence how buyers think about their own situation. That’s what insight-based selling, done well, actually accomplishes.

When Insight-Based Selling Applies

Effective selling isn’t one method applied universally. It requires matching the approach to the buyer’s state. Buyers show up in four fundamentally different situations or states:

• Some know they need something and want help finding it (Needs)
• Some have a problem they want to diagnose (Problems)
• Some have clear goals and are looking for a capable partner (Objectives)
• Some are operating in what I call the Opportunities zone—a state where you see something meaningful that they don’t yet see.

Insight-based selling is the right method for that fourth state. It’s most powerful when a buyer isn’t actively looking for a solution because they haven’t yet connected the dots between their current situation and the opportunity or risk sitting right in front of them. That’s the moment where a well-crafted left turn can genuinely influence how someone thinks.

The Aha Moment

Wikipedia describes the “eureka effect” as the common human experience of suddenly understanding a previously incomprehensible problem or concept. In selling, we call it the Aha Moment—and it’s both the target and the driver of insight-based selling.

Here’s how I define insight in a selling context: Insight is information or an idea based on credible research, authoritative content, or relevant experience. When personalized to your client’s likely or known challenges and opportunities and shared appropriately, it opens their mind to think about their situation in a new way—and shows them a path toward solving a challenge or capitalizing on an opportunity through your solutions.

That’s a precise definition, intentionally. Insight isn’t just any data point you find compelling. It has to be relevant, credible, timely, and connected to something you can actually help with.

Think of the Aha Moment like an earthquake. They vary in intensity—some topple buildings, others just rattle the china cabinet. But both get your attention, don’t they? Not every insight you share will be earth-shattering, and that’s fine. The goal is to create enough of a shift to open a door that wasn’t open before. The Aha Moment is a means to deepen the dialogue and explore new possibilities together with your client. It’s not the end game.

Creating the Left Turn: Juxtaposition and Resolvable Tension

Here’s the approach. You take a baseline fact—something your buyer would recognize as true and relevant to their world—and juxtapose a second fact against it in a way that creates tension. In comedy, that tension is funny. In selling, it’s resolvable, and the resolution points toward what you can do. It’s more impactful if the data points are new to the buyer, but it may still work if they know or have heard the data before, but not juxtaposed.

So, it’s the juxtaposition itself that has to create surprise—not necessarily the individual facts. Your buyer may already recognize both data points, but if they’ve never had to hold them side by side and reckon with what they mean together, the left turn still lands.

For example, they may recognize that 65% of CROs consider new business development a top priority. They may also have a sense that 67% also feel their sales force needs improvement in developing new business. Put them together for the first time, though, and something special happens. It’s the same thing as knowing that chocolate exists, and peanut butter exists, but when you put them together… Boom!

Also, the tension has to feel real and relevant to them. If they don’t recognize their own situation in the scenario, the whole thing falls flat. To continue the chocolate/peanut butter analogy, if you give both to someone who likes neither, you’ll miss the mark.

That raises the practical question: how do you build this with any rigor and consistency? That’s where COIN-OP comes in.

COIN-OP: Building Insight Messages That Hold Up

COIN-OP is a framework I developed to structure the development of insight messages in a way that’s disciplined and scalable. The acronym stands for Challenges, Opportunities, Impacts, Needs, Outcomes, and Priorities.

Each element plays a specific role:

• Challenges/Opportunities: What are the challenges your buyer faces or the opportunities they could capitalize on? This is where you identify the territory your insight will cover.
• Impact: What happens if the challenge goes unresolved or the opportunity is missed? Impact is what creates urgency—it makes the status quo feel costly rather than comfortable.
• Need: What does your buyer need in order to resolve the challenge or achieve the desired outcome? This is the logical bridge between their current situation and their desired future state, fueled by your solution. How can you help?
• Outcome: What specifically changes for the buyer when your solutions are applied? Outcomes are what buyers are actually purchasing—the ability to resolve the challenges or realize the opportunities.
• Priority: What is the priority of the identified Needs and Outcomes from the buyer’s perspective?

In COIN-OP terms, the left turn lives primarily in the C/O and I layers. You establish a baseline with the first fact, then juxtapose a second fact that sharpens the challenge or amplifies the impact. The N and O layers are where the tension resolves—Need clarifies what it will take to bridge the gap, and Outcome defines where the buyer wants to land. Priority is what keeps the structure honest, connecting the urgency of the issue to what the buyer actually cares about most.

One practical test: if you can’t complete the full COIN-OP logic, the insight isn’t ready to share. A left turn that doesn’t resolve isn’t insight—it’s just an uncomfortable fact.

One more consideration: which value driver does your insight speak to? Buyers respond to value framed in four ways—Business (revenue, cost, risk), Execution (how work gets done), Purpose (mission, culture, meaning), and Personal (what’s in it for this individual specifically). Matching your insight to the right value driver for the right stakeholder makes it land where it needs to—and keeps you from presenting a financial argument to someone whose primary concern is their team’s daily experience.

Two Examples

Let’s make this as concrete as possible.

Example 1: The Coaching Gap

Here’s a left turn built for a sales enablement or sales leadership audience.

• Set A: Research consistently shows that 74% of leading companies cite sales coaching and mentoring as the most important role frontline managers play.
• Set B: Yet 47% of sales managers spend less than 30 minutes per week coaching each rep. Some data puts it even more starkly—73% of sales managers spend less than 5% of their time on coaching.

The tension is visible. The thing leaders say matters most is also the thing managers do least. If you offer solutions that help organizations build a genuine coaching culture—through manager development, structured coaching frameworks, or enablement programs that make coaching more consistent—this juxtaposition creates exactly the kind of resolvable tension that opens a real conversation.

The Aha Moment in the buyer’s voice might sound something like: “We say we prioritize coaching. But looking at where our managers actually spend their time, we clearly don’t. What would it look like to change that systematically?”

That’s a door opening, not a sale closing. But it’s the right door.

Example 2: The Sales Technology Paradox

This one resonates with sales leaders and enablement professionals who’ve lived through multiple technology rollouts.

• Set A: Organizations spend an average of $1,200 per rep annually on sales tools, with the average seller now using 8 tools to close a deal.
• Set B: Despite that investment, 67% of purchased features go unused, and 42% of reps feel overwhelmed by their tech stack. Overwhelmed sellers are 45% less likely to attain quota.

More investment. Less adoption. Worse outcomes. If you help organizations drive technology adoption, rationalize an overloaded stack, or build enablement programs that integrate tools into workflow rather than pile them on top of it, this is the tension you’re designed to resolve.

The Aha Moment: “We’ve been measuring success by what we purchased, not by what our reps actually use. Those are very different numbers—and the gap might be costing us more than the tools themselves.”

Building Your Own Left Turn

The process is straightforward, but it requires discipline and honest assessment.

Start with your solutions—what challenges can you actually resolve? Work backward to identify the relevant challenge or opportunity, then find data that establishes a baseline and a juxtaposition that sharpens the impact. Connect the tension back to what you offer and what makes you genuinely different. Validate the structure against the buyer’s Priorities—what’s guiding their decisions and what validates the urgency of acting now.

Then, before you share anything with a buyer, define the Aha Moment you’re aiming for, written in the buyer’s voice. If you can’t write that sentence, the insight isn’t focused enough yet.

A few honest notes. Not every insight creates an earthquake. Some left turns open a window rather than a door, and that’s enough. The goal is to create curiosity and resolvable tension, not to close a sale in a single move. The approach only works if the insight is genuinely relevant to this buyer, in this situation, at this moment. A compelling juxtaposition applied to the wrong audience is just noise.

If you’re building this at scale—developing commercial insights and writing insight messages your entire sales team can use—COIN-OP gives you a repeatable structure, and the value driver messaging adds weight. That’s how you maintain the quality and credibility that make the approach work, regardless of who on the team is delivering it.

Closing Thoughts

Comedians figured out something about human attention that most sales professionals haven’t fully absorbed: surprise creates engagement, and engagement creates openness. When you take someone in one direction and then turn—sharply, credibly, with something they didn’t expect to see—you’ve done something truly valuable. You’ve helped a buyer think about their own situation in a new way.

Insight-based selling, done well, isn’t about impressing buyers with data. It’s about respecting their intelligence enough to show them something real, and trusting that a well-built left turn—grounded in COIN-OP logic—will open more doors than a polished product walk-through ever will.

So here’s the challenge: identify one solution you offer where the gap between what buyers say they prioritize and what they actually do creates genuine tension. Find the data. Build the left turn. Define the Aha Moment. Then go have a different kind of conversation.

Selling is no joke. But the best salespeople and the best comedians have at least one thing in common: they both know the punch line only works if the setup earns it.

Man: “Did I ever tell you that my uncle Bob was a magician?”

Woman: “No, you didn’t! Really?”

Man: “Yup. Every time he walks down the street, he turns into a bar.” 

How to Follow My Work, Connect, or Work With Me

• Hire Me: Mike Kunkle’s Resume (Limited Time Offer)
• Revenue Intervention Sprints: TSR Revenue Intervention Sprints (ungated PDF download)
• The Building Blocks of Sales Enablement Book: https://bit.ly/BBofSE
• My Sales Enablement Straight Talk Newsletter: Sales Enablement Straight Talk! (Subscribe!)
• My LinkedIn Profile: https://www.linkedin.com/in/mikekunkle
• My Linktree: https://linktr.ee/mikekunkle

About Mike

Mike Kunkle is an internationally recognized expert on sales training, sales effectiveness, and sales enablement. He’s spent over 30 years helping companies drive dramatic revenue growth through best-in-class enablement strategies and proven-effective sales systems—and he’s delivered impressive results for both employers and clients. Mike is the founder of Transforming Sales Results, LLC, where he does research and publishes thought leadership, designs sales training, delivers workshops, and helps clients improve sales results through a variety of sales effectiveness practices, sales systems, and advisory services. His book, The Building Blocks of Sales Enablement, is available on Amazon, and The CoNavigator Method for B2B Sales Mastery will be published in 2026.

The post Insight-Based Selling: How to Create Aha Moments That Influence How Buyers Think appeared first on MikeKunkle.com.

The consequences compound downstream. Content built from internal assumptions rather than real buyer research misses the mark. Training programs teach what sellers want to say instead of what buyers need to hear. Messaging talks at buyers rather than for them. Methodology gets deployed without grounding in how buyers actually make decisions. Each failure traces back to the same root cause: substituting internal perspective for genuine buyer understanding.

The result is friction—friction in your content, your conversations, your pipeline, and your close rates. Friction that costs you deals you should win, credibility you shouldn’t have to rebuild, and efficiency you can’t afford to lose.

This post defines Buyer Acumen, walks through a practical approach to building it on a foundation of real buyer research, and uses the Buyer Acumen Wheel to show exactly how it cascades downstream to inform and improve nearly every discipline in your sales enablement system.

One important framing note before we dig in: Buyer Acumen is an enablement input, not a sales execution output. It’s what you build into your system so your sellers can carry it into every conversation—and it’s that individual application, in real buyer interactions, that ultimately drives sales effectiveness.

What Is Buyer Acumen?

Buyer Acumen is a deep, intentional understanding of your buyers and customers. Not the surface-level “we sell to VP Sales types” shorthand, but a rigorous, research-grounded picture of who your buyers are, what they care about, how they’re measured, how they make decisions, and what they need to feel confident moving forward with you.

In The Building Blocks of Sales Enablement, I define Buyer Acumen as encompassing the following:

• Roles and goals: Who are your buyers? Who are the decision makers, influencers, and stakeholders typically involved in a purchase? What are their roles, titles, and responsibilities?
• Buyer personas or profiles: Detailed descriptions of each role that typically participates in buying your products and services
• COIN-OP: The situational heart of buyer understanding, covered in the next section
• Metrics that matter most: How are your buyers measured? How do they and their leaders define success in their role?
• Budgets: What’s their typical budget authority and purchasing span of control?
• Buying process: What’s their typical buyer’s journey? Who else is involved internally? What are their overall decision criteria?
• Company size and verticals: Where relevant, what organizational contexts most commonly describe your buyers?
• Other pressures: What risks, internal politics, or competing priorities might influence their decisions?
• People Acumen and personal needs: What emotional factors or personal needs might be in play? (More on this below.)
• Value drivers: How do your buyers define value—in Business, Execution, Purpose, or Personal terms?

People Acumen and Personal Needs

Within Buyer Acumen lives what I call People Acumen: paying attention and responding appropriately to what matters to each individual buyer as a person, not just as a role. To help sellers think about their buyers’ personal motivators, I use this list, with a mnemonic to make it memorable: PAM Orders Power BARS. The elements are Purpose, Autonomy, Mastery, Order, Power, Belonging, Achievement, Recognition, and Safety. Sometimes there are blends—a buyer with safety needs may also crave order or belonging; one with power needs may also want autonomy or achievement.

Another People Acumen element is what I call the Human Differentiators.

You don’t need to turn your sellers into amateur psychologists. You need them asking good questions, listening carefully, “peeling the onion” (clarifying) to truly understand, and comparing what they hear against the personal motivators. It’s not an exact science, but it’s a meaningful input into how to position and personalize solution messaging for each buyer—and how to reduce the friction that comes from messaging that doesn’t account for what the person in front of them actually cares about. Combine that with behaving in ways that demonstrate the human differentiators, and it’s even more powerful.

COIN-OP: The Situational Heart of Buyer Understanding

Of all the components above, COIN-OP typically provides the deepest situational insight, both for building personas and for the individual sales conversations your sellers have every day. COIN-OP stands for Challenges, Opportunities, Impacts, Needs, Outcomes, and Priorities.

• Challenges: What problems are your buyers trying to solve?
• Opportunities: What opportunities are they hoping to capitalize on?
• Impacts: What are the negative consequences right now of those unaddressed challenges and unrealized opportunities? These are the costs, the risks, the performance gaps—the pain of the status quo.
• Needs: What does their current situation create as a business need? What is the gap between the current and desired future states?
• Outcomes: What does the positive desired future state look like when challenges have been addressed, opportunities have been capitalized on, and success has been achieved?
• Priorities: Among all of the above, especially the Needs and Outcomes, what matters most right now and in what priority order?

The Impacts/Outcomes distinction matters. Impacts describe what’s going wrong now—the current-state pain that drives urgency. Outcomes describe what winning looks like—the future state that motivates the purchase. Conflating the two blunts both. Understanding them clearly gives sellers the language to create urgency and articulate value. For a deeper treatment of COIN-OP and its application, see the article linked in the resources section below.

COIN-OP becomes even more useful when framed inside a Situation Assessment.

The Current State, Desired Future State, and Gap/Impact Analyses framing allows sellers to utilize their understanding of COIN-OP to develop compelling business cases and confirm NASA, or Need And Solution Alignment.

Buying Process Exit Criteria

One of the most underutilized elements of Buyer Acumen is a clear, documented understanding of the buying process and specifically the Buying Process Exit Criteria (BPEC) at each stage.

BPEC is what each buyer needs to see, hear, feel, understand, and believe at each stage of their journey before they’ll feel comfortable moving forward with you. These criteria vary by individual—some will be shared across the decision team at a given stage, while others are unique to a person’s role, perspective, or personal motivators. Not every buyer on the decision team will be at the same stage at the same time, which adds complexity that sellers must actively manage. (See this newsletter for more on this topic: Even if They’re Non-Linear, the Buying/Selling Processes Can be Managed)

When sellers understand BPEC for each buyer at each stage, they can satisfy those criteria deliberately rather than hoping their standard approach happens to land. I call the alternative “selling by superstition”—running the same plays with every buyer regardless of where they are or what they need. BPEC is also the foundation for a concept I’ll return to in the Sales Messaging section: multilingual selling.

How to Build Buyer Acumen

Building Buyer Acumen is both a research project and an ongoing organizational discipline. A critical caveat before the framework:

Buyer Acumen built entirely from internal perspectives will carry the biases of those perspectives and inject friction into every downstream activity it was supposed to eliminate.

Your sellers and managers have valuable input, but their views are filtered through their own experiences, biases, assumptions, and commercial interests. Real buyer understanding requires going outside.

1. Ground your research in voice of the customer. Interviews with existing customers, especially recently won and recently lost accounts, are your highest-value source. Ask what mattered most at each stage, what nearly stopped them from buying, and what they needed to feel confident moving forward. Win-loss analysis is particularly powerful: it removes the polish that satisfied customers apply and gives you unfiltered signal on where your process created friction or failed to satisfy BPEC.
2. Identify your primary personas. Who are the key decision makers, economic buyers, influencers, and end users involved in a typical purchase? Start with roles, not just titles—titles vary across organizations, but roles and responsibilities tend to be more consistent.
3. Map COIN-OP for each persona. What challenges and unrealized opportunities define their current state? What are the negative impacts of that status quo? What needs does their situation create, and what outcomes are they pursuing?
4. Document their buying process. Map the typical journey, who’s involved at each stage, and what overall decision criteria apply.
5. Define BPEC per stage per persona. What does each buyer need to see, hear, feel, understand, and believe at each stage before they’ll move forward? This is the most detailed and most valuable step.
6. Translate your research into seller-ready tools. A Buyer-Centric Messaging Matrix is one of the most useful outputs you can build from this work, capturing COIN-OP, value drivers, discovery questions, messaging frameworks, and more by persona. More on this in the Sales Messaging section below.
7. Validate and iterate. Buyer Acumen isn’t a one-time project. Markets shift, buyer priorities evolve. Maintain ongoing VoC and win-loss programs to keep your understanding current and reduce the friction that comes from acting on stale assumptions.

The Buyer Acumen Wheel: Understanding the Cascade

The Buyer Acumen Wheel illustrates something fundamental: Buyer Acumen doesn’t just inform one or two downstream activities. It’s the hub from which nearly every major discipline in sales enablement radiates outward.

A note on scope: the wheel highlights the most directly and immediately impacted building blocks from the full Building Blocks of Sales Enablement framework. Sales Messaging and Product Training appear here as distinct cascade points even though they live within Sales Methodology and Sales Training respectively in the full framework, because Buyer Acumen’s specific influence on each deserves its own treatment. The “Beyond the Wheel” section shows the cascade reaches further still.

When you get Buyer Acumen right, everything built on top of it works better. When you get it wrong—or skip it—friction compounds at every layer. Let’s look at each spoke.

Buyer Engagement Content

Buyer engagement content—the marketing and thought leadership designed to attract, educate, and engage your target buyers—is only as effective as your understanding of who those buyers are and what they care about.

Without Buyer Acumen, content gets created based on what internal stakeholders want to say rather than what buyers need to hear. With it, you create content that speaks directly to the challenges and unrealized opportunities your personas face, maps to their stage in the journey, and reflects their specific value drivers. Buyer Acumen is the brief your content team always needed but rarely had. Without it, even well-produced content generates friction because it doesn’t resonate with the buyers it’s supposed to reach.

Sales Support Content

Sales support content—the collateral, battle cards, ROI tools, case studies, and other resources sellers use throughout the buying process—needs to be designed to satisfy BPEC at each process stage. If you don’t know those criteria, you’re guessing. The result is content that gets created but not used, or used but doesn’t move buyers forward. That’s friction at the point where it’s most costly.

With Buyer Acumen, you map your support content to specific stages and personas, so sellers always have the right material at the right moment and buyers get exactly what they need to move forward confidently.

Sales Training

Most sales training skews heavily toward product knowledge and selling skills applied in the abstract. Buyer Acumen dramatically improves both relevance and stickiness.

When sellers understand the personas they’re engaging—their COIN-OP, their value drivers, their buying process—training becomes more contextual and more transferable. Role-plays can be grounded in real buyer situations. Discovery training can be built around what your actual buyers care about, not generic frameworks applied in a vacuum. Training without this grounding produces sellers who know the techniques but struggle to apply them in ways that reduce friction with real buyers.

Sales Coaching

Sales coaching is only as effective as the reference points the coach uses to evaluate performance. Managers who don’t have a clear picture of buyer-centric behavior—or what effective BPEC management looks like in practice—are coaching in the dark.

Buyer Acumen gives managers a concrete framework for coaching conversations: Did the rep uncover this buyer’s COIN-OP? Did they identify and address BPEC for each decision maker at this stage? Are they managing multiple stakeholders who may be at different points in the buying process simultaneously? These are the right questions, and they require Buyer Acumen as the baseline to ask them well.

Sales Process and Exit Criteria

A well-designed sales process has stages with stage names, and each stage has objectives, tasks, and exit criteria. Seller exit criteria—what sellers themselves must complete before advancing an opportunity—are one part of that picture. But they’re only part of it.

The other part, and the more differentiating part, is the seller’s responsibility to manage BPEC for every individual decision maker and influencer on the decision team. Those criteria vary by buyer: some are shared across the team at a given stage, while others are unique to a person’s role, perspective, or personal motivators. Sellers who don’t understand this sell the same way to every buyer regardless of where they are or what they need. That’s friction—avoidable, diagnosable, and expensive.

This is why seller-side stage exit criteria should always include a specific accountability: to intentionally uncover, clarify, satisfy, and confirm acceptance of BPEC for each buyer at each stage. Meeting your own seller tasks is necessary but insufficient if you haven’t satisfied what your buyers need to move forward.

There’s an additional complexity worth understanding: buying and sales processes aren’t linear. Different decision makers may be at different stages simultaneously. New entrants—influencers or stakeholders who surface mid-cycle—can change the criteria you’re managing entirely. Reps who understand this stay vigilant and adapt. Reps who don’t end up with stalled deals they can’t explain.

Managing both seller exit criteria and individual buyer BPEC deliberately is the central task in opportunity management. It transforms sales process from an administrative forecasting tool into a genuine performance lever—one that directly targets the friction that stalls and loses deals. And as the above image suggests, it’s also where Buyer Engagement Content, Sales Support Content, and BPEC converge.

As with systems thinking in general, the parts are important but the whole is often greater than the sum of its parts. 

Sales Methodology

Your sales methodology—the frameworks, plays, and techniques sellers use to execute within the process—should be informed by what your buyers actually respond to. What questioning approaches work with your personas? What conversation frameworks resonate? What does effective situation assessment look like for the specific challenges your buyers face?

None of these can be answered well without Buyer Acumen as the input. Methodology without buyer grounding is technique for its own sake, and technique disconnected from buyer reality creates friction in every sales conversation it was supposed to smooth.

Sales Messaging

Perhaps the most obvious cascade point—and consistently where the gap between intent and execution is widest. Sales messaging must be persona-specific to be effective, and when you’re selling to real people in active opportunities, it needs to go further: it must be buyer-specific.

This is where multilingual selling comes in. Not selling in Italian, French, or German—but developing the ability to vary your messaging and communicate value based on each buyer’s individual BPEC, their role, and their value drivers. Your CFO and your head of Sales Operations are both on the decision team, but they have different COIN-OP, different value drivers, and different BPEC. Messaging calibrated for one will fall flat or create friction with the other.

A Buyer-Centric Messaging Matrix (pictured above) is one of the most practical tools for making this executable. Organized by persona, it captures everything sellers need to walk into a conversation prepared: COIN-OP by role, value drivers, buyer type, metrics and how they’re measured, POSE value stories (Problem | Outcome | Solution | Explore) to capture interest, targeted discovery questions, guidance on demo and presentation approach, how to build solutions to address buyer needs, common concerns and how to resolve them, competitive positioning, and how to communicate outcomes in the buyer’s own value driver language. It’s where Buyer Acumen stops being a persona document and starts becoming something sellers can actually use. It’s also one reason it’s so critical for cross-functional collaboration between product, product marketing, and sales enablement.

Without Buyer Acumen as the foundation, a messaging matrix is just empty boxes. With it, it’s one of the most powerful tools in your enablement system.

Product Training

Product training is typically treated as internally focused: here’s what the product does, here’s how it works. The most effective product training reorients that entirely, framing capabilities through the buyer’s lens.

Buyer Acumen and tools like the Messaging Matrix help you build product training that anticipates the questions buyers actually ask, connects capabilities to buyer-relevant outcomes, and prepares sellers to position your solutions in terms of COIN-OP rather than feature lists. Without it, even excellent products get positioned in ways that create friction because sellers can’t bridge from capability to buyer need in a way that lands.

Beyond the Wheel: Other Downstream Impacts

The eight spokes of the wheel represent the most direct cascade points, but Buyer Acumen’s reach extends further across the full Building Blocks framework and other embedded frameworks, models, tools, and systems.

Sales hiring benefits when competency profiles and behavioral interviewing incorporate buyer-centric skills—specifically, a seller’s demonstrated ability to understand and respond to buyer needs, not just pitch fluently.

Sales onboarding becomes dramatically more relevant when new sellers are immersed in Buyer Acumen from day one, rather than spending their ramp time overwhelmingly on product features and internal processes.

Sales analytics and metrics improve when leading indicators reflect buyer-aligned behaviors rather than activity metrics disconnected from buyer response.

Sales manager enablement is strengthened when managers are equipped to coach to buyer-centric behaviors—which requires them to understand Buyer Acumen themselves, not just expect it of their reps.

There’s also a direct connection to the Sales Effectiveness Acumens: what enablement builds into the system through Buyer Acumen is the same knowledge sellers must carry into every conversation as Buyer & Customer Acumen. It’s the same foundational understanding expressed in two directions: one organizational, one individual.

Closing Thoughts

Buyer Acumen isn’t one element of your sales enablement program. It’s the foundation every other element is built on.

Get it right—grounded in real buyer research, voice of the customer, and rigorous win-loss analysis rather than internal assumptions—and the returns compound: better content, more effective training, sharper coaching, more relevant methodology, and messaging that lands. Skip it, or build it from the inside out, and you introduce friction into every single downstream activity, for both your sellers and your buyers.

The good news: building genuine Buyer Acumen doesn’t require a massive budget or a team of analysts. It requires intentionality, a structured approach, and the commitment to treat buyer understanding as an organizational capability rather than an assumed given.

Start with your personas, grounded in real buyer research rather than internal opinion. Map their COIN-OP: the current-state pain driving urgency, and the desired future outcomes motivating action. Document their buying process and BPEC. Then trace those insights through every spoke on the wheel. The friction you remove from your enablement system will show up where it counts most: in your pipeline.

Other Buyer Acumen Resources

Here are some resources you may find useful as you continue exploring Buyer Acumen:

• Podcast: Buyer Acumen with Mike Kunkle — The State of Sales Enablement
• Webinar: 6 Steps to Transition to Buyer-Centric Selling
• Article: Buyer Acumen is the Best GTM Foundation — GTM Mag

How to Follow My Work, Connect, or Work With Me

• Hire Me: Mike Kunkle’s Resume
• Revenue Intervention Sprints: TSR Revenue Intervention Sprints (ungated PDF download)
• The Building Blocks of Sales Enablement Book: https://bit.ly/BBofSE
• Sales Enablement Straight Talk Newsletter: Sales Enablement Straight Talk! (Subscribe!)
• LinkedIn Profile: https://www.linkedin.com/in/mikekunkle
• Mike’s Linktree: https://linktr.ee/mikekunkle

About Mike

Mike Kunkle is an internationally recognized expert on sales training, sales effectiveness, and sales enablement. He’s spent over 30 years helping companies drive dramatic revenue growth through best-in-class enablement strategies and proven-effective sales systems—and he’s delivered impressive results for both employers and clients. Mike is the founder of Transforming Sales Results, LLC, where he does research and publishes thought leadership, designs sales training, delivers workshops, and helps clients improve sales results through a variety of sales effectiveness practices, sales systems, and advisory services. His book, The Building Blocks of Sales Enablement, is available on Amazon, and The CoNavigator Method for B2B Sales Mastery will be published in 2026.

The post How Buyer Acumen Cascades to Support Sales Enablement appeared first on MikeKunkle.com.

Introduction

If you lead a sales team or support one, you’ve likely seen this story play out. Your organization invests in a solid sales methodology. Reps go through training. Everyone nods along in the kickoff meeting. Then reality hits. Pipeline stalls. Win rates stay flat. Quota attainment hovers in the low 50s or worse. The methodology sits on the shelf, and leaders scratch their heads wondering what went wrong.

The culprit is rarely the methodology itself. It’s the lack of a deliberate, repeatable coaching system that ensures reps actually adopt and master it.

The Coaching Gap No One Talks About

Most sales managers coach the way they were coached or the way they think they should. They jump in opportunistically when they happen to overhear a call or review a deal. They offer quick tips or step in to save the sale. They might run a tactical session when rolling out a new qualification tool. But that’s not a system. It’s random acts of coaching.

I’ve spent more than 30 years studying what actually works in sales performance, including 16-plus years of Top-Performer Analysis across multiple organizations. Time after time, the data shows the same pattern. The top four percent of sellers do not succeed because they’re naturally gifted or lucky. They succeed because they follow repeatable behaviors, mindsets, and processes that can be taught and reinforced.

The problem is that most organizations stop at training the sellers. They never equip the managers to coach those behaviors consistently in the field. Without that layer, even the best methodology fails to stick.

“Organizations that achieve high adoption of a formal sales process and methodology see plan attainment around 112 percent, quota attainment near 72 percent, and win rates approaching 58 percent.”

Research from CSO Insights makes the gap crystal clear. Most companies never reach those numbers because they train the reps but never build the coaching muscle in their managers. They don’t achieve high level of adoption nor true mastery of the methodology.

In my own work at employers and clients alike, I’ve seen the other side of the coin. When we implement a full coaching system alongside the methodology, the results follow quickly: 12 to 34 percent revenue growth in under a year, sales per rep up 47 percent in four months with an 11 percent lift in average profitability per rep, new-hire ramp times cut by as much as 52 percent, and newly trained four-month reps outperforming five-year veterans. Those are not theoretical numbers. They come from aligning hiring, onboarding, sales process, sales methodology, sales coaching, and sales management operating systems so everything reinforces everything else.

The gap exists because most managers operate without a framework. They rely on instinct, availability, or whatever crisis is loudest that day. Developmental coaching gets pushed aside for tactical fire-fighting or opportunistic comments. Over time, reps plateau, managers burn out, and the organization leaves millions on the table.

What a Real Sales Coaching System Looks Like

The CoNavigator Method for Sales Coaching Mastery—part of a broader B2B sales and management system I’ve developed over three decades—closes that gap with a complete system built on five simple elements: inputs, people, process, tools, and models, which produces clear outputs and measurable results.

The system starts with the right inputs: sales competency knowledge (what good looks like from top-performer research), diagnostics (where the gaps are), and metrics (how performance is tracking). The people involved are straightforward: the seller and the manager working together as co-navigators.

The heart of the system is the Sales Coaching Process, which follows four steps every time: Diagnose, Plan, Do, and Review. This is not a one-and-done event. It becomes the rhythm of continuous improvement.

The Four Types of Coaching and Why Developmental Matters Most

Before we dive into the process, it helps to understand the four types of coaching that exist in most organizations.

• Strategic coaching focuses on big-picture planning, such as optimizing a territory over a quarter or year.

• Tactical coaching targets specific skills as part of a rollout, like a new qualification method, updated discovery approach, or individual deal coaching.

• Opportunistic coaching happens when a manager happens to observe something and jumps in. It is helpful when it occurs, but it depends on luck and timing.

“Developmental coaching is where the real performance lift lives.”

• Developmental coaching is the one most organizations undervalue and under-utilize. It is purposeful, ongoing, and focused on identifying and closing specific skill gaps that directly improve sales performance. It is individualized, making it personalized, “dynamic coaching” which has been shown to produce the best results. And it follows a cadence of ongoing coaching and continuous improvement.

Developmental coaching turns average reps into consistent producers and good reps into top performers. Without it, the other three types deliver only sporadic gains. While the system and framework is designed to fully support Developmental Coaching, much of it, and especially the models, can support all of the coaching types.

The Sales Coaching Framework in Action

The framework brings everything together. Managers use the ROAM model in the Diagnose step to compare Results versus Objectives, then examine Activities and Methodology to find root causes for the performance gap (or if there isn’t one, the next thing to improve and make even better). From there they move to Plan, where they select the right solution using a Solutions Chart that matches the condition, reason, and appropriate fix.

“ROAM forces the conversation from vague ‘You need to close more deals’ to specific ‘Your discovery calls are missing impact questions, which is why your win rates are 15 points below target.’”

Every coaching session follows the SLED model to keep things structured and productive:

• Set the Stage (with a POP Value Check—Purpose, Outcomes, Plan, Value to them—to set context, build alignment, and foster psychological safety).

• Lead the Performance Analysis Discussion (using ROAM so the rep sees the gap first).

• Explore Solution Options and Agree on the Best One (with the Solutions Chart).

• Develop and Implement an Action Plan (that the rep owns).

This structure prevents the common trap of managers jumping straight to advice. It keeps the conversation collaborative and the rep invested.

The Models That Make Coaching Repeatable

From SLED (or more appropriately, during it), the system branches into the right type of intervention based on the need.

• Field Training is for reps who do not know what to do, why, or how. It follows Tell, Show, Do, Review with clear understanding checks at each step. Understanding Checks (in all the models) are the ultimate excuse-remover.

• Sales Coaching addresses skill gaps. It uses Engage, Practice, Do, Review, with Understanding Checks. Role-play is not optional here—it’s the practice that builds muscle memory before the real calls.

• Sales Counseling tackles mindset or belief barriers. It uses the same model as Sales Coaching and follows the same flow but spends extra time in Engage to surface and address mindset blocks or self-limiting beliefs, before moving forward.

• The SOIL Feedback Model handles quick, everyday corrections. The model is Situation, Observed Behavior, Impact, Learning—always with Understanding Checks to keep it collaborative and ensure alignment. Most managers default to vague, reactive feedback that reps can’t act on. SOIL gives those moments structure, so even a two-minute post-call debrief produces a clear takeaway and shared accountability, while reducing defensiveness and improving the likelihood your feedback will be accepted.

The Tools That Turn Insight Into Action

Two tools anchor the entire system and remove guesswork.

The Solutions Chart (now expanded with a Solution Content box) shows exactly what type of intervention fits each situation and where to pull the content from: your company’s sales methodology, top-performer practices, industry best practices, or the manager’s own experience.

When consequences need alignment, the system draws on the Four Behavioral Consequences and the Personal Needs and Motivators framework. Managers learn to use these thoughtfully so behavior change sticks.

If you haven’t seen my previous posts on personal motivators, I developed a mnemonic to help remember them: PAM Orders Power BARS for Purpose, Autonomy, Mastery, Order, Power, Belonging, Achievement, Recognition, and Safety. When managing consequences or trying to increase or decrease behavior, tying your strategies to personal motivators can be very helpful.

Diagnosing the root-cause and choosing the right solution are key, but performance improvement—especially when behavior change is needed—doesn’t always happen quickly. That’s where the Review stage of the process comes in.

The Review phase extends naturally into Rolling Reviews—short recurring sessions that focus on one pre-identified skill gap until it is closed. They turn coaching from a sporadic event into a predictable rhythm that even the best players need.

The result of all of this is a personalized learning plan for every rep that sticks until both skills and performance improve. Reps get better faster. Managers spend their time on high-impact activities instead of firefighting. Organizations see the kind of sustained adoption that drives those CSO Insights-level performance lifts.

Why This System Works Where Others Fall Short

The difference is not in the models themselves. It’s in the integration. Most coaching training stops at a single model like GROW and leaves managers to figure out the rest. This system connects every piece: inputs, diagnostics, solution selection, session execution, follow-through, and behavioral reinforcement. It’s built from the same Top-Performer Analysis that informs the full CoNavigator Method, so it mirrors exactly what elite managers do to develop elite teams. It’s how you build a world-class sales force.

I’ve watched this play out in real client implementations. Those gains come from the system, not from any single tool or meeting.

Closing Thoughts

In the end, it comes down to this: good intentions and occasional coaching sessions are not enough. You need a complete system that makes developmental coaching the default operating rhythm, not a lucky break. And that is why most sales managers still fail at coaching and why you need a system to fix it.

The CoNavigator Method for Sales Coaching Mastery gives managers exactly that system. It turns coaching from an art they hope to master into a repeatable process they can execute every week. When paired with the full CoNavigator Method for B2B Sales Mastery and Sales Management Mastery, it creates the kind of aligned, high-adoption environment where methodology actually gets used and results actually improve.

Resources

• Explore the full Sales Coaching System with its framework, models, and tools in the upcoming book series (first title releasing mid-2026)

Previous Sales Effectiveness Straight Talk newsletters on coaching topics:

• “The Mysteries of Sales Coaching Revealed!” https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/mysteries-sales-coaching-revealed-mike-kunkle-oitte

• “So, You Want to Train Your Sales Managers to Coach – Now What?” https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/so-you-want-train-your-sales-managers-coach-now-what-mike-kunkle-50p1e

• “How to SLED Through a Coaching Session” https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/how-sled-through-coaching-session-mike-kunkle-i0kvc

• “Sales Coaching Case Study: Diagnosing and Solving Performance Issues” https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/sales-coaching-case-study-diagnosing-solving-issues-mike-kunkle-fjeye

My book The Building Blocks of Sales Enablement: https://www.amazon.com/Building-Blocks-Sales-Enablement/dp/1952157625

How to Follow My Work, Connect, or Work With Me

• Hire Me: Mike Kunkle’s Resume
• Revenue Intervention Sprints: TSR Revenue Intervention Sprints (ungated PDF download)
• The Building Blocks of Sales Enablement Book: https://bit.ly/BBofSE
• Sales Enablement Straight Talk Newsletter: Sales Enablement Straight Talk! (Subscribe!)
• LinkedIn Profile: https://www.linkedin.com/in/mikekunkle
• Mike’s Linktree: https://linktr.ee/mikekunkle

About Mike

Mike Kunkle is an internationally recognized expert on sales training, sales effectiveness, and sales enablement. He’s spent over 30 years helping companies drive dramatic revenue growth through best-in-class enablement strategies and proven-effective sales systems—and he’s delivered impressive results for both employers and clients. Mike is the founder of Transforming Sales Results, LLC, where he does research and publishes thought leadership, designs sales training, delivers workshops, and helps clients improve sales results through a variety of sales effectiveness practices, sales systems, and advisory services. His book, The Building Blocks of Sales Enablement, is available on Amazon, and The CoNavigator Method for B2B Sales Mastery will be published in 2026.

The post Why Most Sales Managers Still Fail at Coaching and the System That Fixes It appeared first on MikeKunkle.com.

Gallup’s 2026 State of the Global Workplace report landed last week, and the numbers should alarm every sales leader. Why? Because global manager engagement has collapsed from 31% in 2022 to 22% in 2025—a nine-point drop in three years, with the steepest single-year fall between 2024 and 2025. The “engagement premium” that managers once enjoyed over individual contributors has all but disappeared. They are now only as engaged as the people they lead.

That’s the macro picture. Now let’s look elsewhere (not all from the Gallup report) at what’s happening in sales, specifically.

• Only 25% of B2B sales reps hit quota in 2024—down from the traditional 70% attainment benchmark. One quarter.
• 70% of sales leaders identify burnout as the primary barrier to sales team engagement.
• Gallup finds that managers account for 70% of the variance in team engagement. Disengaged managers produce disengaged teams, and disengaged teams miss quota.
• Best-practice organizations achieve 79% manager engagement—nearly four times the global average. They are not outliers or lucky. They have built something intentional.

If you’re a CRO or Head of Sales of any title and are wondering why your team is underperforming, the Gallup data is telling you something worth taking seriously.

The Wrong Response—And Why It Won’t Work

Most organizations will respond to data like this the same way they always have: an engagement survey, a town hall, maybe a recognition program, a leadership offsite, or some management training. None of that is wrong. It’s just not enough—and it doesn’t get to the root cause.

I’ve used a diagnostic tool in my coaching work for years called the Solutions Chart, that I adapted from the work of Ferdinand Fournies. It maps the root causes of why people don’t do what we want them to do—and in some cases, what they know they’re supposed to do. The top conditions are: they don’t know what, why, or how; their thinking is incorrect; there are obstacles beyond their control; there are personal limits; or there’s fear. Engagement surveys don’t fix any of those. Neither do tasty snacks and motivational speakers.

The root cause of the manager engagement crisis is two-fold, and both sides require deliberate, systemic intervention. Kurt Lewin, one of the pioneers of applied psychology, captured it elegantly decades ago:

B = f(P, E): Behavior is a function of the Person & the Environment

If you want to change manager behavior and engagement, you have to work both sides of that equation. To do that, you must equip the person (P) with the operating system, skills, and tools to do the job well. And you must design the environment (E) so that equipped managers can actually succeed. Most organizations address one or neither. The ones achieving 79% manager engagement address both.

The Person Side: Equip Your Managers With a Real Operating System

Here’s an uncomfortable truth that the Gallup data reinforces: most frontline sales managers (FSMs) are set up to fail before they manage their first team meeting. The typical path is to find the best salesperson, promote them, hand them a team, and wish them luck. No management system. No structured development. Just seller instincts applied to a fundamentally different job.

Is it any wonder they disengage?

When people don’t know how to do a job well—when success feels elusive or arbitrary—they disengage. The fix isn’t inspiration. It’s capability. And capability requires a system.

The Sales Management System

The Sales Management System provides the complete architecture for what the FSM’s job actually is. At the top sits something most management frameworks never address explicitly: removing barriers to FSM engagement. Everything below that depends on it.

The Sales Management System — © Transforming Sales Results, LLC. All rights reserved.

The system encompasses the Sales Hiring System, the Sales Management Operating System (smOS), and Sales & Management Technology. Let’s look at the smOS in particular, because this is where the operating rhythm lives.

The Sales Management Operating System (smOS)

The Sales Management Operating System (smOS) — © Transforming Sales Results, LLC. All rights reserved.

The smOS gives managers the structured, proactive approach that replaces reactive firefighting with intentional, repeatable management. It covers the Customer Lifecycle, Sales Process, and Sales Methodology; management Activities and Meetings (what they are, the best practices for each, and the expected cadence for each); the Sales Coaching Framework; Sales Performance Management; and Sales & Management Technology.

When managers operate from a clear system like this, they know what the job is and how to do it. That clarity is itself an engagement driver.

Hiring the Right People First

The Sales Hiring System — © Transforming Sales Results, LLC. All rights reserved.

Manager engagement—and team engagement downstream—starts at the front of the employee lifecycle: hiring. When FSMs are equipped to hire well, they start with a team that has the foundation to succeed. When they hire poorly, they spend their days managing performance gaps and disengagement rather than developing talent. Lewin’s equation applies here, too: get the right people (P) into the right environment (E) and the probability of high performance rises substantially.

The Sales Employee Lifecycle — © Transforming Sales Results, LLC. All rights reserved.

The Sales Coaching System: The Highest-Leverage People Development Tool

Sales Coaching System — © Transforming Sales Results, LLC. All rights reserved.

Of all the levers available to a frontline sales manager, purposeful, structured, and personalized (dynamic) coaching is the one with the highest impact on both performance and engagement. Coaching done well builds competence (which builds confidence), fosters growth (which creates meaning), demonstrates that the organization is invested in the individual (which drives belonging and loyalty), and creates clarity and accountability (which earns trust).

These aren’t soft benefits. They map directly to what Google’s landmark research—Project Aristotle and Project Oxygen—identified as the characteristics of high-performing teams: psychological safety, dependability, structure and clarity, meaning, and impact. The Sales Coaching System addresses all of them.

The system is built on several models, each designed for a different root-cause situation:

• SLED (Set the Stage, Lead the Performance Analysis Discussion, Explore Solutions, Develop an Action Plan)—the meeting framework that governs how every coaching session is led. The manager starts with the R and O of ROAM independently—reviewing Results vs. Objectives to identify a performance gap worth addressing. That analysis surfaces the focus for the session. Then SLED governs the meeting itself, where the manager pulls the rep into the diagnosis collaboratively. The A (Activities) discussion happens with the rep inside that session, and the M (Methodology) observation typically requires call or meeting recordings, or live field observation, during or after the initial meeting. Often, the first two steps of SLED occur in one meeting with the second two steps in another, with observation occurring between them.Note: ROAM doesn’t hand off to SLED—they’re intertwined. ROAM finds the focus and, together with the rep, confirms the root cause; SLED structures the conversation through which that happens and the solution is chosen.

• Field Training Model (Tell, Show, Do, Review)—directive teaching for when a rep doesn’t know what, why, or how to do something. Builds competence from the ground up. Think of this like pouring water into an empty pitcher.
• Sales Coaching Model (Engage, Practice, Do, Review)—facilitative coaching for when a rep knows the skill but needs to do it better. Think of this as drawing the water (capability) out of the pitcher, rather than pouring it in.
• Sales Counseling Model—often overlooked and underutilized. Applied when the root cause is mindset or self-limiting beliefs rather than skill gaps. When a rep believes their way is better, or your approach won’t work, no amount of training or coaching resolves it. They may also lack confidence, which is directly correlated to the likelihood they’ll try what they learned in the field. Sales counseling addresses the thinking that drives the behavior. This is where breakthrough moments happen, and where managers who don’t have this tool stall.
• SOIL Model (Situation, Observed Behavior, Impacts, Learning)—helps when the seller just needs feedback. If they think they’re doing something but aren’t, feedback may be all that’s needed upfront. That may lead to retraining or coaching, but it’s good to set a solid expectation first.
• Understanding Checks—in training, coaching, counseling, and SOIL feedback, Understanding Checks should be used at every step. If the employee can’t summarize the discussion or role-play the skill, there’s no way to know whether communication actually occurred or whether the rep can do what they were taught or coached.

Developmental Coaching (Dynamic Coaching) deserves special mention because it has the most direct impact on engagement. Developmental coaching is forward-looking and personalized to the individual needs of the seller — focused on growth, advancement, and unlocking potential. Reps who experience it feel genuinely invested in. They develop mastery, which creates meaning. They see a future for themselves at your company, which creates loyalty. This connects directly to PAM Orders Power BARS — the nine personal motivators (Purpose, Autonomy, Mastery, Order, Power, Belonging, Achievement, Recognition, Safety) that drive individual performance.

Rolling Reviews close the loop. After each coaching session, a Rolling Review keeps the rep focused on their action plan and targeted improvement areas, maintains continuity across sessions, and demonstrates that the manager is genuinely committed to development over time. Without Rolling Reviews, coaching becomes episodic. With them, it becomes a system. That sustained investment is one of the most reliable engagement drivers available to a sales manager.

The Adoption & Mastery Mantra

The Adoption & Mastery Mantra— © Transforming Sales Results, LLC. All rights reserved.

Having the right coaching system matters only if it’s actually used. I’ve found this principle holds across every sales organization I’ve worked with:

• What gets asked about gets focus.
• What gets measured gets done.
• What gets integrated into workflow gets adopted.
• What gets coached gets mastered.
• What gets adopted and mastered moves the needle.

This isn’t just psychobabble. It’s the operating logic of performance improvement. Organizations that apply it consistently see 12–47% revenue improvements in 6–12 months, depending on organization size and commitment level. (Note: Full sales methodology roll-outs may take longer to achieve >75% adoption. I’ve seen it happen faster in smaller organizations, but 18–36 months is not unheard of.) Third-party research reinforces it: formal, dynamic coaching consistently outperforms ad-hoc approaches on quota attainment and win rates.

The Environment Side: Create the Conditions Where Managers Can Thrive

This is where most organizations stop short. They invest in manager training, hand FSMs a playbook, and then put them in an environment that defeats them. Deming said it best: put a good performer against a bad system, and the system wins nearly every time. Equipping the person (P) is necessary but not sufficient. The environment (E) must also be designed for success.

This is a senior leadership responsibility — and it’s where the cascade matters most. The engagement that shows up in your sales teams doesn’t start with the FSM. It starts at the top and works its way down: CEO and ELT set the conditions for second- and third-line sales leaders; those leaders set the conditions for FSMs; FSMs set the conditions for their teams. If disengagement exists anywhere in that chain, it flows downward.

Remove Barriers to FSM Engagement

Look again at the top element of the Sales Management System: Remove Barriers to FSM Engagement. I put it there intentionally, because it’s the thing most likely to be overlooked—and the thing most likely to undermine everything below it.

What barriers? Administrative drag. Excessive internal reporting that keeps FSMs in spreadsheets instead of with their teams. Meetings that crowd out coaching time. CRM hygiene requirements that fall on managers rather than being automated. If your FSMs are spending their days on non-coaching activities, you’ve designed a system that produces disengagement regardless of how good your coaching program is.

Worth asking: if you mapped how your FSMs actually spend their time, what percentage would be on high-leverage activities—diagnosing performance, coaching, developing people—versus administrative compliance? Most leaders who do this exercise are surprised by the answer.

Realistic Spans of Control

The Gallup report identifies organizational flattening as a structural driver of the engagement collapse. When companies cut management layers and expand team sizes to reduce costs, manager engagement declines — and team engagement follows. A manager with twelve reps doesn’t have the bandwidth to coach each one effectively. They’re playing whack-a-mole with performance gaps instead of building capability.

This is not a training problem. You can’t coach your way out of a structural design problem.

Servant Leadership From Above

Managers need to be led the way they’re expected to lead their teams. If the CRO’s management philosophy is “Harder, Faster, Longer, Louder” — pressure on outcomes with no investment in how — that posture cascades directly to the FSM and then to the rep. You cannot build a coaching culture from the middle of the org chart. It requires visible, consistent servant leadership from the top.

That means clear expectations from above, not just targets. Coaching and development for the FSM themselves. Protection from organizational dysfunction. Recognition of the role’s genuine difficulty — Gallup’s data shows leaders and managers report more stress, anger, sadness, and loneliness than individual contributors. That emotional burden is real, and ignoring it is a design choice.

Compensation and Incentives Aligned to the Right Behaviors

Incentive structures that reward only revenue and quota attainment—without accounting for leading behaviors like coaching quality, rep development, and methodology adoption—reward the wrong things. They incentivize the FSM to jump into deals rather than coach reps through them. They reward the short-term hero save over the long-term capability build. If you want FSMs to invest in coaching, make coaching visible, measurable, and rewarded.

Psychological Safety as an Organizational Norm

Google’s Project Aristotle found psychological safety—the shared belief that the team is safe for interpersonal risk-taking—to be the single most important characteristic of high-performing teams. This applies above the FSM as much as below. If FSMs can’t surface problems, admit mistakes, or push back on unrealistic targets without career risk, you’ve designed a system that produces exactly the disengagement Gallup is measuring.

Psychological safety isn’t a culture initiative. It’s a leadership behavior. It shows up in how senior leaders respond when an FSM brings them bad news. And to be clear, psychological safety isn’t a “get out of accountability free” card. It is possible to have both. See this newsletter for more on that topic: How to Merge Psychological Safety & Accountability

What Results Look Like When Both Sides Are Working

This isn’t theoretical. I’ve seen the cascade work at scale across more than 48 organizations—both employers and clients—from startups to Fortune 10.

When FSMs are equipped with a real management operating system and put into an environment designed for their success, the results are measurable and substantial. Organizations that commit to this approach—equipping FSMs with the full Sales Management System and designing the environment to support it—consistently see 12–47% revenue improvements within 6–12 months, depending on organization size and the quality and depth of implementation.

That range isn’t random. The organizations at the high end do something the others don’t: they apply the Adoption & Mastery Mantra with discipline. They ask about it, measure it, integrate it, coach it. What gets adopted and mastered moves the needle. What doesn’t, doesn’t.

The 79% manager engagement in Gallup’s best-practice organizations isn’t an outlier. It’s the outcome of doing both halves of Lewin’s equation right—consistently, systemically, over time.

The Straight Talk Version

The Gallup data is telling you something important. The engagement collapse isn’t a generational attitude problem. It isn’t a remote work problem. It won’t be solved by a town hall or a better survey instrument.

It’s a systems problem. Managers are operating without real operating systems, in environments not designed for their success, held accountable for outcomes they don’t have the tools or conditions to produce. Of course they’re disengaging.

The question isn’t whether you can afford to fix this. It’s whether you can afford not to.

If you’re ready to do something about it, reach out on LinkedIn or visit mikekunkle.com/services.

Resources

• Gallup’s 2026 State of the Global Workplace Report — Download the full report
• The Building Blocks of Sales Enablement — Mike Kunkle (ATD, 2021)
• Sales Counseling as a Performance Improvement Tool — SEST Newsletter
• How to SLED Through a Coaching Session — SEST Newsletter
• Connecting Dots to Build a High-Performing Sales Culture — MikeKunkle.com
• Straight Talk About What Holds Companies Back from Getting Better Sales Results — MikeKunkle.com
• Why the GROW Model Is Not Sufficient for Sales Coaching & Driving Growth — SEST Newsletter

How to Follow My Work, Connect, or Work With Me

• Hire Me: Mike Kunkle’s Resume
• Revenue Intervention Sprints: TSR Revenue Intervention Sprints (ungated PDF download)
• The Building Blocks of Sales Enablement Book: https://bit.ly/BBofSE
• Sales Enablement Straight Talk Newsletter: Sales Enablement Straight Talk! (Subscribe!)
• LinkedIn Profile: https://www.linkedin.com/in/mikekunkle
• Mike’s Linktree: https://linktr.ee/mikekunkle

About Mike

Mike Kunkle is an internationally recognized expert on sales training, sales effectiveness, and sales enablement. He’s spent over 30 years helping companies drive dramatic revenue growth through best-in-class enablement strategies and proven-effective sales systems—and he’s delivered impressive results for both employers and clients. Mike is the founder of Transforming Sales Results, LLC, where he does research and publishes thought leadership, designs sales training, delivers workshops, and helps clients improve sales results through a variety of sales effectiveness practices, sales systems, and advisory services. His book, The Building Blocks of Sales Enablement, is available on Amazon, and The CoNavigator Method for B2B Sales Mastery will be published in 2026.

The post Why Your Sales Managers Are Disengaging and What to Do About It appeared first on MikeKunkle.com.

We’re going to look at the real numbers—from CSO Insights’ Fifth Annual Sales Enablement Study, from labor market research on middle-market companies, and from independent sales performance analyses—and then walk through what those numbers actually mean in dollars for a company. (Note: CSO Insights was acquired by MHI Global in 2015, and following MHI Global’s acquisition by Korn Ferry in 2019, was integrated under the Korn Ferry umbrella.)

• Spoiler Alert: the revenue gap mentioned above is far bigger than most CEOs and CROs realize. And closing it doesn’t require adding headcount.

Introduction: The Problem Nobody Wants to Name

Let’s start with a question that might hurt a bit:

“What percentage of your sales reps hit quota last year?”

It often gets quiet when I ask this. A few people mumble. Someone laughs nervously. Because the honest answer, for most companies, is painful.

According to RepVue’s Cloud Sales Index, only about 43% of sellers hit quota in the first half of 2024—and that number has hovered in the low-40s for six consecutive quarters. Let that sink in. In the average sales organization, more than half of your quota-carrying sellers are missing their number. Every quarter. Year after year.

• Sidebar Disclaimer: Not having been born yesterday, I am well aware that some of this problem may result from horrible quota-setting practices. Noted. But when there is a declining 10-year trend measuring the same way and setting quotas the same way, it is still pretty indicative of a problem beyond quota-setting practices.

Now combine the quota attainment decline with this: the National Center for the Middle Market (NCMM) identifies approximately 200,000 middle-market firms in the U.S.—companies with $10M–$1B in annual revenue—that collectively account for about one-third of private-sector GDP. These aren’t tiny startups or Fortune 500 giants. They’re the backbone of the American economy. And most of them are leaving a stunning amount of revenue on the table because their sales execution is flying without instruments.

This post is the business case for changing that. Not with more reps. Not with a new CRM. With something far more fundamental: a formal, buyer-aligned sales process and a formal sales methodology that sellers adopt and managers reinforce through structured coaching and workflow integration.

The data will show you exactly what’s possible. Let’s dig in.

The State of the Average Middle-Market Sales Force

Who Are We Talking About?

I’ll use the middle market as an example throughout, so we can get into some real numbers. The National Center for the Middle Market (NCMM) defines middle-market companies as those with $10M–$1B in annual revenue. There are roughly 200,000 of them in the U.S., employing around 44.5 million people—that’s an average of about 220–225 employees per firm.

What does the sales team look like at a company that size? According to Pave’s 2025 compensation dataset (drawn from over 2,900 companies with more than 50 employees), sales functions comprise roughly 12–14% of headcount at companies with 200–1,000+ employees. Apply that to our “average” middle-market firm and you’re looking at approximately 26–31 sales roles—a mix of account executives, SDRs/BDRs, account managers, sales engineers, and related quota-carrying positions. For our model, we’ll use 27 sellers.

The Quota Attainment Reality

Here’s where things get uncomfortable. As noted above, approximately 43% of those sellers are hitting quota in any given period. That means, in our representative middle-market firm with 27 sellers, roughly 12 reps are consistently achieving their number. Fifteen are not.

Before you dismiss this as a “hiring problem” or a “motivation problem,” let’s explore what the research actually says is driving it.

“The data points clearly: random and informal approaches to sales enablement fail to reach even average results—and may be worse than doing nothing.”
~CSO Insights Fifth Annual Sales Enablement Study

CSO Insights’ Fifth Annual Sales Enablement Study (conducted across 918 organizations worldwide) found that the overwhelming majority of organizations—those with random or informal sales enablement approaches—couldn’t achieve even average results across the three core sales KPIs: win rates, quota attainment, and revenue plan attainment. More striking still: a random or informal approach to enablement may actively drag performance below what it would be with no enablement at all.

The culprit isn’t talent. It’s the system—or more precisely, the absence of one.

What Research Shows About Process and Methodology

Formal Enablement Moves the Needle

Let’s talk numbers directly from the CSO Insights study, because these deserve to be seen clearly:

• Organizations with formal sales enablement posted win rates of 49.0% vs. 42.5% for those without—a 15.3% relative improvement.
• Revenue plan attainment: 103.6% with formal enablement vs. 101.0% without.
• Quota attainment: 61.2% with formal enablement vs. 59.8% without.

Those headline numbers are meaningful, but they’re actually the floor, not the ceiling. The real performance gains come from the layers beneath.

Buyer Alignment: The Multiplier

CSO Insights identifies four levels of how well an organization’s internal selling process aligns with the customer’s actual buying path: random, informal, formal, and dynamic. Only 19% of organizations in the study had achieved dynamic alignment—meaning they had not only mapped their sales process to the buyer’s journey but also built in mechanisms to adapt that process as buyer behaviors change.

That 19% achieved something remarkable:

• 9% improvement in win rates vs. the study average
• 8% improvement in quota attainment vs. the study average

Read that again. Nearly 18 more percentage points on win rates. Nearly 12 more percentage points on quota attainment. From alignment. Not from hiring better reps. Not from a new comp plan. (Not that either of those things are bad ideas, but the leverage of formal process and methodology is an outlier in terms of the results it can produce.)

Adoption Is the Unlock

Here’s something the research makes unmistakably clear: having a process or methodology isn’t enough. The performance gains are directly tied to how widely and consistently the sales force actually uses them.

CSO Insights analyzed performance at different levels of sales process and methodology adoption and found a striking staircase effect:

• At less than 25% adoption: revenue plan attainment of 97.6%, quota attainment of 49.4%, win rate of 40.4%—all below average.
• At 76–90% adoption: revenue plan attainment jumps to 106.7%, quota attainment to 64.0%, win rate to 54.1%.
• At greater than 90% adoption: revenue plan attainment reaches 112.5%, quota attainment reaches 72.4%, win rate reaches 57.8%.

This may be the most important table in sales enablement research, and most organizations have never seen it, or worse, have seen it and ignored it. At greater than 90% adoption, you’re not just beating average—you’re operating in a completely different performance tier.

“At greater than 90% process and methodology adoption, organizations achieve 112.5% of revenue plan, 72.4% quota attainment, and 57.8% win rates—all dramatically above study averages.”
~CSO Insights Fifth Annual Sales Enablement Study

Coaching: The Reinforcement Engine

Implementing a formal sales process and sales methodology alone won’t get you to high adoption. That requires coaching—and not the random, inconsistent kind that most organizations rely on. Not just deal coaching. Not just firing off feedback. Real, skills-based, behavioral coaching that improves performance across all deals.

The CSO Insights study is emphatic on this point: dynamic sales coaching (formally structured, aligned to the sales process and methodology, consistently delivered by frontline managers, and tailored to individual rep needs) produces dramatically better outcomes than leaving coaching to individual manager discretion.

• Win rates with dynamic coaching: 55.2% vs. 41.8% for the random approach—a 32.1% improvement.
• Quota attainment with dynamic coaching: 21.3% above the study average, and 27.9% better than the random approach.

And yet 62.9% of organizations in the study still follow a random or informal coaching approach. Which means…

Most companies have their single biggest performance lever sitting untouched.

Workflow Integration: The Compound Effect

One more data point worth flagging: when sales enablement technologies are integrated into CRM and other engagement and enablement tools—rather than existing as standalone point solutions—quota attainment was 6.8% higher than average, and win rates were 4.1% higher. This isn’t magic; it’s what happens when the process lives in the seller’s daily workflow rather than in a binder or a training event they attended 18 months ago.

What the Execution Gap Is Costing Your Company in Real Dollars

The Model

The numbers above are meaningful in isolation, but let’s make them tangible. Here’s a transparent, conservative financial model you can adapt for any middle-market company. I’ll show the assumptions explicitly so you can stress-test them.

A quick note before we run the numbers: the scenarios below are intentionally illustrative. The inputs are drawn from the best available public data, and the assumptions are shown explicitly so you can substitute your own. This is a directional model, not a financial audit. The point is to give you a credible framework for sizing the opportunity—not a number to put in a board deck without your own validation.

Baseline inputs:

• 27 sellers (as derived from NCMM and Pave data above)
• Current quota attainment: 43% of reps hitting quota (RepVue)
• Target quota attainment: 72.4%—the CSO Insights figure for organizations at greater than 90% process and methodology adoption
• Sales-influenced revenue: 70% of total revenue (conservative; accounts for contractual carryover and non-sales channels)
• Year-1 ramp adjustment: 0.6 (accounts for mid-year rollout)
• Year-1 realization factor: 0.7 (accounts for adoption curve and coaching maturity)
• Combined Year-1 realization: 42% of full potential
• Current effective sellers (hitting quota): 43% × 27 ≈ 12
• Target effective sellers (at 72.4% attainment): ≈ 19–20

Net gain: 7–8 more sellers consistently hitting quota—from system improvement, not headcount addition.

The Scenarios

Here’s what that translates to across three revenue scenarios:

Scenario A—$50M company:

• Sales-influenced revenue: $35M
• Revenue per effective seller today: $35M ÷ 12 ≈ $2.92M
• Year-1 incremental revenue: $2.92M × 7 × 0.42 ≈ $8.6M
• That’s 17% of total revenue from process and methodology formalization alone.

Scenario B—$100M company:

• Year-1 incremental revenue: ≈ $17.2M

Scenario C—$250M company:

• Year-1 incremental revenue: ≈ $43.1M

And these are conservative estimates. They exclude:

• Reduced seller turnover (lower recruiting, hiring, and ramp costs—CSO Insights found fully engaged sales forces had voluntary turnover rates nearly 40% lower than disengaged ones).
• Shorter sales cycles (which expand capacity without adding headcount). Special note: shorter sales cycles are a result of doing other things better. Pushing buyers to improve deal velocity almost always backfires.
• Larger average deal sizes (a documented byproduct of structured methodology adoption).
• The CRM-embedded technology uplift (+6.8% quota attainment, +4.1% win rates) documented above.
• Compounding Year-2 and Year-3 effects as adoption matures toward the greater-than-90% tier.

Now ask yourself: What’s your CFO’s threshold for a business case worth funding?

What to Do About It: The Implementation Roadmap

The research tells us what works. Here’s how to sequence it.

Step 1: Establish a Formal Enablement Charter and Executive Sponsorship

CSO Insights found that organizations with a formal and charter-based sales enablement approach—one with a documented vision, goals, strategy, and roadmap—achieved win rates of 55.1% vs. 39.2% for those with a random approach. That’s a 16-point gap from formality alone, before any specific initiative is even deployed. This is why I always start with a charter.

The charter isn’t bureaucracy. It’s the alignment mechanism that ensures your sales enablement investments connect to actual business strategy and measurable outcomes—and that executive sponsors stay engaged rather than checking out after the launch event. RACI or RASCI can clarify roles nicely, too.

Step 2: Build a Buyer-Aligned Sales Process

This is the “what and when” of selling. Map your customers’ actual buying paths—the steps, decision gates, and commitment points buyers move through on the way to a decision. Then translate those into your internal sales process stages with verifiable outcomes and required buyer commitments at each stage. Not pipeline stages for CRM hygiene. Actual buyer-aligned stages that reflect reality.

The goal is to eliminate the misalignment—the “we’re at 80% close probability” that turns out to be a 0% because the buyer wasn’t actually where the seller thought they were.

Step 3: Adopt a Formal Sales Methodology

The sales process tells sellers what to do and when. A sales methodology tells them how to execute—how to run discovery, how to build consensus in a multi-stakeholder deal, how to navigate concerns and gain commitments. Process without methodology produces inconsistent execution. Methodology without process produces skilled sellers going in the wrong direction.

The specific methodology you choose matters less than the choice to formalize one. Whether you adopt an established framework, license a commercial methodology, or build something proprietary, just do it. I obviously recommend my CoNavigator Method for B2B Sales Mastery, which is designed around buyer-aligned navigation of complex sales, based on how to top 1-4% of top performers sell. But whatever you chose (as long as it’s modern, buyer-centric, consultative, and value-focused), the point is that your sellers need a shared language, shared plays, and shared standards. Then they need to be trained on it, coached to it, and held accountable for using it.

Step 4: Enable Managers First, Not Last

This is where many enablement programs fail. Companies invest in seller-facing training and assume managers will figure out the coaching piece on their own. They won’t—at least not consistently. CSO Insights found that when managers use a dynamic coaching approach aligned to the sales process and methodology and focused on individual rep needs, quota attainment is 21.3% above average and win rates are 19.0% above average. That doesn’t happen by accident.

Frontline managers need to be trained on the methodology before their sellers are. They need structured coaching frameworks, defined cadences, and the tools to provide feedback that’s tied to specific stages and skills—not just intuition and war stories from their own selling days.

Step 5: Embed Everything into Workflow

Training events fade. Binders collect dust. What sticks is what lives in the daily workflow. Build your process stages, buying process exit criteria, next-best-action prompts, and content assets into your CRM and engagement and enablement systems. When a seller opens an opportunity record, the methodology should be right there—guiding the next conversation, surfacing the right content, flagging the gaps.

This is how you get to greater than 90% adoption. Not by mandating it, but by making it the path of least resistance.

I’ve come to think of this as my Adoption & Mastery Mantra—five principles that describe exactly how formalization becomes performance:

• What gets asked about gets focus.
• What gets measured gets done.
• What gets integrated into workflow gets adopted.
• What gets coached gets mastered.
• What gets mastered moves the needle.

Read those in sequence and you’ll feel the whole implementation roadmap compressed into five lines. Each step in this section maps to one of them. Miss one, and the chain breaks.

Step 6: Measure What Matters

Define your leading and lagging indicators before you launch, not after. Adoption rates (process and methodology usage), win rates, quota attainment, revenue plan attainment, sales velocity, and coaching activity quality are all measurable. Track them consistently. Adjust quarterly. The CSO Insights data shows that formalized collaboration and production models—the inner workings of enablement—when implemented correctly, lifted quota attainment 13.1 points above average. The inner workings matter.

Closing Thoughts

Here’s the honest summary:

Most sales organizations operate at roughly half their potential.

Not because their people aren’t capable. Because the system hasn’t been built to consistently bring out the best of their capability.

And in case this isn’t obvious, if you think this doesn’t apply to your middle market or even enterprise organization, well, you’d be mistaken. I used the middle market as an example for this post, but I have seen this apply to the Fortune 5000 straight up to the Fortune 10. Oh, you think your vertical is different? I know this is a popular cognitive bias, but that’s incorrect thinking, as well.

The CSO Insights research is unambiguous. A formal, buyer-aligned sales process—combined with a formal sales methodology that sellers genuinely adopt and managers actively coach to—reliably and significantly lifts win rates, quota attainment, and revenue plan attainment.

The performance gains are not marginal. They’re transformational. And they are available to any organization willing to do the foundational work.

The financial model I walked through above is conservative. The real number at your company—your actual revenue, your actual team size, your actual mix of closers and “near-missers”—is probably larger. Run the numbers with your CRO. Use the formula I laid out. Look at what it would mean if even half of your currently missing quota got recovered over the next 24 months. Take it past your CFO for a reality check and any adjustments.

Then ask whether, “We don’t have a formal process or methodology” is still an acceptable answer.

I don’t think it is. And I think, if you’ve read this far, neither do you.

Resources

The following sources were referenced in building this business case. I encourage you to read the primary research directly—it’s worth your time.

• CSO Insights Fifth Annual Sales Enablement Study (Miller Heiman Group, 2019): Download here, ungated
• Blog post on com: The Perplexing Power of Process & Methodology in Complex B2B Sales
• The CoNavigator Method: How Does Your Sales Methodology Compare to What Top Performers Do?
• National Center for the Middle Market — Middle Market Indicator: org and https://www.middlemarketcenter.org/performance-data-on-the-middle-market
• NCMM Year-End 2025 Middle Market Indicator (via Wells Fargo): com/middle-market
• Pave 2025 Compensation Data (headcount benchmarks): https://www.pave.com/blog-posts/team-size-benchmarks-for-sales-marketing
• RepVue Cloud Sales Index (quota attainment data): com/cloud-sales-index
• Korn Ferry Sales Effectiveness Research: com/insights/articles/sales-effectiveness
• Johnny Grow — Sales Win Rate Research: https://johnnygrow.com/sales/sales-acceleration/sales-win-rate/
• Grape Nordic — Sales Process and Win Rate Analysis: https://grapenordic.com/insights-sales-process-yields-37-better-win-rate/

How to follow my work, connect, or work with me:

• Hire Me: Mike Kunkle’s Resume
• Advisory Services & Coaching Programs: TSR Advisory Services & Coaching (ungated PDF download)
• The Building Blocks of Sales Enablement Book: https://bit.ly/BBofSE
• Sales Enablement Straight Talk Newsletter: Sales Enablement Straight Talk! (Subscribe!)
• LinkedIn Profile: https://www.linkedin.com/in/mikekunkle
• Mike’s Linktree: https://linktr.ee/mikekunkle

About Mike

Mike Kunkle is an internationally recognized expert on sales training, sales effectiveness, and sales enablement. He’s spent over 30 years helping companies drive dramatic revenue growth through best-in-class enablement strategies and proven-effective sales systems—and he’s delivered impressive results for both employers and clients. Mike is the founder of Transforming Sales Results, LLC, where he does research and publishes thought leadership, designs sales training, delivers workshops, and helps clients improve sales results through a variety of sales effectiveness practices, sales systems, and advisory services. His book, The Building Blocks of Sales Enablement, is available on Amazon, and The CoNavigator Method for B2B Sales Mastery will be published in 2026.

The post Your Sales Methodology Execution Gap Is Costing You Millions! appeared first on MikeKunkle.com.

That’s why I created the CoNavigator Revenue Intervention Sprints: focused, high-impact solutions that address your most critical revenue constraints.

• Pipeline Creation: Setting more & better quality appointments
• Opportunity Conversion: Improving opportunity win rates
• Account Expansion: Growing accounts strategically

The content in these sprints is built on proven practices sourced from decades of top-performer analysis and the buyer-centric principles outlined in my sales methodology and upcoming book, The CoNavigator Method for B2B Sales Mastery. They combine practical frameworks, modern, buyer-centric selling strategies, and actionable tools to help sellers align with buyers, co-create value, and drive outcomes.

Why Revenue Interventions? 

Revenue challenges are almost always constraint-driven. When you address the root cause, performance improves. Fixing the wrong constraint wastes time and risks credibility. Focused interventions in the right constraint outperform broad, unfocused change.

When preferred, the same approach can be positioned internally as “Revenue Acceleration Sprints” to emphasize momentum and growth.

The post Accelerate Growth with Revenue Intervention Sprints appeared first on MikeKunkle.com.

Introduction

This piece is a little different from what I usually publish. I’ve been thinking a lot about the connections that create high-performing workplaces and world-class sales teams—and I’m concerned we’re not seeing enough environments where people can truly thrive.

Over the years, I’ve learned that performance isn’t just about talent. It’s about how behavior, environment, leadership, process, systems, and tools come together to shape “the way we do things around here”—and just as importantly, “the way we treat people around here.”

Culture is behavior at scale. Change the behaviors, and you start to change the culture. Change the environment, and you make those behaviors easier, more likely, and more durable. Put those together—grounded in leadership that puts others first—and you create the conditions for consistent performance in sales and beyond.

These are the dots I hope to help you connect. Let’s dig in.

The Dot Connections That Build High Performance

High-performing workplaces don’t happen by accident. They’re built on an intentional operating system: clear methods, practical workflows, human-centered leadership, psychological safety, and disciplined coaching—so the right actions become normal.

Companies with defined, customer-aligned sales processes and enablement, including manager coaching, consistently outperform ad-hoc approaches on win rates and quota attainment. The lesson: rituals and routines matter.

When teams plan customer interactions, execute with exit criteria, and debrief in a regular cadence, performance becomes less about heroics and more about a reliable system. Done well, that system shapes “how we do things” and “how we treat people”—with clarity, feedback, and support instead of pressure and ambiguity.

What this looks like in practice:

• Customer‑aligned stages with exit criteria: not just “had a meeting,” but “validated goals and impact.”
• Embedded job aids: call plans, checklists, comparison guides, and value narratives available at the moment of need.
• Manager cadence: short, focused coaching sessions aligned to methodology excellence, grounded in observed behaviors and data.
• Closed‑loop learning: teams capture insights (win/loss, discovery patterns), update plays, and reinforce quickly.

From Behaviors to Beliefs: Why Adoption Changes Mindset

Change the actions first, and attitudes often follow. Social psychologist Daryl Bem’s Self-Perception Theory suggests that when internal cues are uncertain, people infer their beliefs by observing their own behavior.

In practice, when sellers consistently work a customer-aligned approach, collaborate in coaching, and see those behaviors drive results, their identity and beliefs about “what good looks like” start to align with the actions. Action changes identity. Emotion follows action.

That’s why execution discipline is far more than process compliance—it’s cultural scaffolding. The repeated experience of applying a method, reflecting on the outcome, and improving the next rep—supported by leaders—shifts norms from “what’s convenient” to “what works.”

Psychological Safety: The Operating Condition for Performance

Behavior change alone won’t fully transform “how we treat people.” Psychological safety—the shared belief that the team is safe for interpersonal risk-taking—is the foundation for learning and innovation.

Google’s Project Aristotle found psychological safety is the single most important dynamic in effective teams—more critical than dependability, clarity, or even impact. When people feel safe to speak up, admit mistakes, and challenge assumptions, they learn faster and innovate more.

Signals of psychological safety:

• People volunteer dissenting views without social penalty.
• Managers model “admit and learn” behaviors after missteps.
• Teams treat early risk‑surfacing as a strength, not a weakness.

When safety is low, the cost of candor rises. Ideas go unsaid, customer risks stay hidden, and coaching becomes inspection instead of development. Or, equally as damaging, groupthink emerges. The workplace gets quieter—but not better.

Systems Beat Individuals: Design the Environment

Kurt Lewin’s equation—B = f(P, E)—reminds us that behavior is a function of the person and the environment. If we want better performance, we must work both sides: hire capable people and design an environment that enables them to do great work.

Both W. Edwards Deming and Geary Rummler said it best (paraphrased):

Pit a good performer against a bad system, and the system wins nearly every time.

The takeaway? Fix the system before blaming the person.

Geary Rummler further reinforced this decades ago: we spend too much time “fixing” people and not enough time fixing broken systems. For sales, that means workflows that reduce administrative drag, reinforce discovery quality, and surface signal from noise—so managers coach leading behaviors rather than firefighting lagging outcomes.

Servant Leadership: Other‑Centric by Design

High performance is easier in organizations that are other-centric. Executives succeed when boards, customers, and employees succeed. Managers succeed when their teams do. Sellers succeed when customers achieve outcomes they value.

This is servant leadership—and it’s not just philosophical. Decades of research, including systematic reviews and meta-analyses, link servant leadership to stronger job performance, higher commitment, and positive ripple effects across teams. When leaders put others first, teams thrive.

Classic wisdom points the same way:

• Zig Ziglar: You can get everything you want if you help enough others get what they want.
• The Platinum Rule (Michael O’Connor & Tony Alessandra’s book): Treat others as they want to be treated.
• Hal Rosenbluth’s book, The Customer Comes Second: Put employees first to ensure customers are treated like gold.

Servant leadership operationalizes respect. It shows up in how managers allocate time (coaching), how executives make decisions (stakeholder impact), and how teams handle mistakes (learn, improve, move forward).

It’s the leadership ethos that binds behavior and environment.

Hiring and “Fit:” Inclusion Without Sameness

Hiring well is essential—but “cultural fit” is too often misused as a proxy for preference, reinforcing unconscious bias and narrowing the range of thinking in the room. Lewin’s point about environment is instructive: design the system so a wide range of capable people can thrive.

Think “values and role alignment,” not homogeneity. The goal is a workplace where diverse perspectives can participate fully, safely, and effectively—and where processes, tools, and coaching help everyone perform.

The practical filter: will this person’s values and working style be compatible with our operating norms (collaboration, transparency, customer focus), and do we have the management capability to help them succeed? If yes, avoid over-indexing on similarity. Diversity in thought and experience is a performance asset.

Manager Behaviors That Make It Real

Frontline sales managers are the culture carriers and performance lever for change and sales effectiveness. Their routines are the daily proof of what the organization values.

• Coach the cause, not just the result: target leading behaviors (e.g., discovery depth, multi‑threading, hypothesis testing) and help reps practice simulated scenarios using real account information.
• Run disciplined one‑on‑ones: purpose, observed evidence, a single constraint to address, and agreed next steps—brief, focused, and frequent.
• Model candor with care: normalize error‑sharing and risk‑flagging; praise thoughtful dissent and challenging questions.
• Protect time for deep work: shield teams from performative reporting; streamline workflows; prioritize customer outcomes over internal noise.

These are not soft efforts. They’re performance levers. When managers coach behaviors, not just dashboards, teams improve the inputs that cause revenue rather than chasing lagging indicators.

Executive Actions That Create the Environment

Executives set the conditions. Their job is to make high performance easier to do than not to do.

• Anchor on clarity: define strategic outcomes, customer value, and role expectations; align process and metrics accordingly.
• Invest in manager enablement: train managers in observation, feedback, and practice; make coaching the highest‑leverage move in sales leadership.
• Design for psychological safety: set norms for candor, curiosity, and respectful challenge; measure team safety and intervene where needed.
• Fix systems, not just people: address bottlenecks, simplify workflows, embed job aids, and ensure tools support behavior, not distract from it.

When leaders do these things, they make behavioral excellence the path of least resistance. The operating system supports the work; the culture supports the people.

Measurement: The Quiet Discipline Behind Improvement

You can’t coach what you can’t see. Effective organizations measure both behaviors and outcomes—comparatively and by role—so managers can diagnose constraints and focus coaching where it matters most.

Indexing performance by role (AEs, SDRs, account managers) and tracking conversion by stage, economic-buyer access, discovery exit criteria, and multi-threading give leaders the evidence to improve the system, not just inspect the pipeline. Measurement is not surveillance; it’s clarity. The aim is to illuminate what top performers do differently, then help others do it deliberately and consistently.

Common Pitfalls That Undermine Culture

Even well‑intended teams slip into patterns that erode performance and trust.

• Process without purpose: methods become checklists; outcomes become “stage moves” instead of customer progress. Fix: reconnect stages to exit criteria and impact.
• Coaching by inspection: managers review dashboards and ask for updates rather than observing behaviors and building capability. Fix: reorient to leading behaviors and practice.
• Safety theater: organizations talk about openness but penalize dissent or mistakes. Fix: leaders model vulnerability and reward candid risk‑surfacing. (Don’t shoot messengers.)
• Heroics over systems: celebrating individual rescues instead of fixing root causes. Fix: apply Deming/Rummler—improve the system, reduce the need for heroes.

How to Start: A Practical Sequence

You don’t have to boil the ocean. Start small, move fast, and build momentum.

1. Map the current environment: identify friction points in processes, tools, and handoffs; capture what top performers do that others don’t.
2. Define the few behaviors that matter most: pick three leading indicators you will coach and measure; tie them to customer progress exit criteria. For best results, select the three actions based on individual needs. (Or start with something widespread and after those are addressed, move to individual competency gaps.)
3. Establish manager cadence: weekly or bi‑weekly sessions focused on observation, practice, and next actions; measure both behavior and outcome.
4. Set psychological safety norms: agree on team behaviors (invite dissent, admit mistakes, ask better questions); leaders model them.
5. Close the loop: run short cycles—trial, observe, adjust—and publish improvements to plays, job aids, and workflows.

Do this for 90 days, then assess what moved. Keep the behaviors that mattered, drop the rituals that didn’t, and scale what works.

Closing Thoughts

High performance in sales—and across the business—springs from connected dots: behavior, environment, leadership, and learning. Formalizing how we work (method, process, and enablement) shapes “the way we do things.” Psychological safety and servant leadership shape “the way we treat people.” Systems thinking keeps us focused on the environment, not just the individual.

Put these together, and you create a workplace where people can perform at a high level and feel respected while doing it.

If you want to explore how to design a sales culture that makes high performance the norm, let’s start with a conversation. I’ll share practical steps you can apply right away to improve manager coaching, team safety, and execution discipline.

Connect or DM me on LinkedIn or scroll to the bottom of this page: https://www.mikekunkle.com/services to request a meeting or send me a message.

The post Connecting Dots to Build a High-Performing Sales Culture appeared first on MikeKunkle.com.

In this article, I’ll explore B2B sales methodology differentiators—the mindsets, skills, and behaviors that top performers use to win more deals and build lasting customer relationships.

The content was forged from 16 years of conducting Top-Performer Analyses, so you can compare how your sales methodology and sales force stack up against the best of the best.

NOTE: This post was originally published in my LinkedIn newsletter, Sales Enablement Straight Talk. It’s been edited significantly here but drawn from the same content. You can see the newsletter version here. And actually, I first covered this topic in June 2025 using a methodology I co-created with a colleague as the comparison. With the upcoming 2026 launch of my book, The CoNavigator Method for B2B Sales Mastery, I’m now using my own methodology as the benchmark—reflecting everything I’ve learned from those Top-Performer Analyses and fully representing my intellectual property. For simplicity, I’ll sometimes abbreviate the method as TCM as we proceed.

An Important Disclaimer

This may sound “salesy” to some of you, since this is a sales methodology I developed and sell. I get it. And if you’re interested in exploring methodologies and include mine, I won’t be heartbroken. But the point of this newsletter is to share what I’ve learned. Because those learnings are baked into my methodology, it’s the best example I can use.

Also, this is the written word. I’m not twisting your arm, and there’s no obligation to do anything. So take advantage of the knowledge and worry less about me hypnotizing you into buying workshops (“You are feeling very sleeeepyyyy…”). Fair? I hope so.

INTRODUCTION

Top-Performer Analysis

Let’s start by defining Top-Performer Analysis (TPA).

 Top-Performer Analysis is a study designed to identify the mindset, traits, knowledge, skills, and behaviors that set top performers apart from other sales representatives.

 TPA reveals both the similarities and differences among top sales performers. These insights can then be translated into practical guidance for average performers: what to continue doing, what to start doing or do differently, and what to stop doing.

What is a Top Sales Performer?

A Top Sales Performer is a seller who consistently demonstrates right blend of results, mindsets, traits, knowledge, skills, and behaviors you want to replicate across your sales force. (Someone you would clone if you could.) They succeed on merits vs. fortunate circumstances.

The Difference Between a Top Performer and a Top Producer

 This article highlights the difference between a Top Sales Performer and what I call a Top Producer: Do You Know the Difference Between a Top Producer and a Top Performer?

In short, a top producer may be putting up the numbers, but it’s due in whole or part to fortunate circumstances. This could mean inheriting great orphaned accounts, taking over a resigned top performer’s territory, working with a sales manager who swoops in to close major deals, or any combination of these factors. By contrast, you could drop a true top performer into the middle of the Sahara Desert, and they would find a way to rebuild their territory.

In the above article, you may also be interested in the concept of a Hidden Top Performer, who has the right stuff and is doing all the right things (and doing well), but whose success is limited by unfortunate circumstances, much like a top producer’s performance is boosted by fortunate ones.

If you’d like to learn more about Top-Performer Analysis, download this deck: Top-Performer Analysis.

With that foundation, let’s segue into the review of topics in The CoNavigator Method for B2B Sales Mastery, where I’ll share some of the key differentiating behaviors of top performers, as we go. I can’t share every single differentiator from the program, but I’ll call out those I’ve seen repeatedly in my Top-Performer Analysis work over the years.

Review of the Top-Performer Practices in The CoNavigator Method

As you progress through the four sections of the method, it’s worth noting that there is some cross-pollination of topics. Breaking these skills into sections is not an exact science. The course is designed to cover the entire customer lifecycle, which teaches all the skills, but we recognize that doesn’t work for all roles. So, when teaching a subset of the course for a specific role, we always customize for the role, which may include mixing and matching modules across sections. Keep that in mind as you go through the below.

Also, I will describe each module but will highlight certain ones that are most impactful based on patterns I saw in the Top Performer Analyses.

CORE PRINCIPLES: Buyer-Centric Selling – The Key to Sustainable Success

 The Core Principles section lays the foundation of mindsets and skill sets essential for buyer- and customer-centric selling. Even if a client wants to customize a path through TCM for a specific role that doesn’t require every skill taught in the course, I always recommend completing this section.

THE MODULES & DIFFERENTIATORS

Introduction to The CoNavigator Method:

 This module introduces buyer‑centric selling and B2B buying research that shows why it is needed. There is nothing skills‑based or differentiating here, other than recognizing that most buyers are dissatisfied with sellers. If we want that to change, we must change how we sell.

Aligning with the Buyer:

Buyers have grown weary of poor sales behavior. Many are disappointed with salespeople.

This module, and the entire TCM methodology, is designed to change that.

I teach three frameworks to help with this:

• NASA (Need And Solution Alignment)
• COIN‑OP (Challenges, Opportunities, Impacts, Needs, Outcomes, and Priorities)
• ACC (Acknowledge, Clarify, and Confirm)

These models help you understand buyers and customers better than your competitors ever will. NASA ensures you operate in your buyer’s best interest, which is the essence of buyer‑centric selling. COIN-OP is a framework for understanding their current state and desired future state (this reappears later in the Discovery module). ACC is an active listening and communication model that ensures your buyer feels deeply understood.

 These simple but powerful concepts appeared repeatedly in Top‑Performer Analyses over the years.

The Value Stack:

 This module introduces the concept of AIR (Awareness, Interest, and Relationship). The Value Stack refers to the idea that, for buyers to move from one stage to the next in their buying journey, they must experience enough AIR to feel confident about moving forward. There are decision thresholds at every step of their buying journey, and the seller must meet those thresholds. This is a powerful reminder that the focus is on the buyer—not just you or your sales process. I’ve used AIR for years and the concept that the seller must build AIR to meet the buyer’s next decision threshold, to be willing to move forward.

 The Value Stack is also a great diagnostic tool when you sense resistance. Going deeper, the Interest portion of AIR is defined by four Value Drivers: Business, Execution, Purpose, and Personal.

 Almost every buyer has a primary Value Driver and often one or more secondary drivers. This concept appears again in the Navigating Value Conversations module, where we emphasize learning to speak about solutions in multiple ways, based on how each buyer perceives “value.”

I’ve also used Bain’s B2B Elements of Value Pyramid, which is excellent and very detailed with 40 elements. While I still appreciate Bain’s work, the four Value Drivers are far easier for the average sales rep to remember and apply.

Interpersonal Communication:

This has been a popular module. Not because it introduces anything groundbreaking, but because it’s a great reminder to use the interpersonal skills we already have, with purposeful intention. Top performers don’t just rely on natural ability—they apply those skills consistently and intentionally. That’s what I saw again and again in Top-Performer Analyses.

Influence & Persuasion:

 Here, I teach Aristotle’s classic model: Ethos, Pathos, and Logos—or credibility, emotion, and logic. Average sellers tend to keep emotion out of their interactions. Top performers bring it in on purpose, and it makes a difference.

Your Value Story:

 Here’s where I introduce POSE for the first time (you’ll see it again in Navigating Appointment Setting with POSE). POSE stands for Problem, Outcome, Solution, Explore and is a story format that starts from the buyer’s perspective with the problems they face (that you know you solve). This is an incredibly powerful model that came straight out of Top-Performer Analysis and has made quite an impact for my clients. It works for both prospecting and presenting.

Want to take it a step further? Weave Ethos, Pathos, and Logos into your Value Story (especially emotion), and use the right Value Driver for the buyer. This is advanced, but the kind of “Multilingual Selling” and tailored value communication is what I saw top performers consistently do far better than average.

Navigating and Resolving Concerns:

Too many reps handle concerns like Al Jaffee’s “Snappy Answers to Stupid Questions” from MAD Magazine: snarky, combative, tricky, or manipulative. TCM takes a different approach with a buyer-centric communication model: ACCRC, which stands for Acknowledge, Clarify, Categorize, Respond, and Confirm. (If you’re paying attention, you can notice ACC is built into this model. Acknowledge is all about empathy and the entire model is about demonstrating understanding before responding.)

This focuses on understanding vs. being combative or clever, and matching the right response to the type of concern. The deeper reps understand the concern, the better chance they have of resolving it. I have rarely seen this behavior and process used outside of the top 20% of sales reps, and it’s a key differentiator.

By the way, I refuse to use words like “objections,” “overcome,” or the phrase “handle objections.” Do you know any buyers who want to be “overcome” or “handled?” No, you don’t. But once buyers feel deeply understood, helping them resolve their concerns is almost always welcomed.

PROSPECT DEVELOPMENT: Generate New Business Like a Top Performer

The New Business Development section teaches the knowledge and skills needed for developing new business with modern buyers. As I tell sales managers as I prep them to support the program, the content in this section is aimed at bringing in new logos, but much of it also applies to growing current accounts.

 Whether you’re upselling, cross-selling, expanding, or working your way into other divisions of an existing customer, these principles matter. Some of what I teach here can also apply to Opportunity Management and Account Management, so don’t think of it as limited to prospecting alone.

THE MODULES & DIFFERENTIATORS

Customer Lifecycle:

Most reps don’t think about the overall customer lifecycle. Yet if they can identify where the prospect is in their lifecycle, relative to the problems the rep can solve and the solutions they sell, reps can adapt their approach to meet the buyers where they are.

 If your buyer doesn’t recognize the seriousness of the problem, you’ll need a different approach than if they’re already pursuing a solution or have just purchased one. Top Performers observe the cues and clues that reveal where the buyers are in their lifecycle and adapt accordingly.

Researching Prospects:

Research (and Sales Call Planning in the next section) gets talked about a lot but isn’t done nearly enough. The level of research varies based on several factors, and that’s the first decision top performers make.

Sometimes they spend up to 5 minutes finding up to 3 facts they can use to personalize their approach. Other times, they’ll invest hours deep-diving to build a critical, executive-level approach for one of only 25 named accounts. In either case, or somewhere in-between (it’s a sliding scale), the point is to do the right amount of research to make a compelling approach, based on the situation and potential account value.

Appointment Setting:

Problem-based prospecting is far more effective than product-based prospecting, and top performers know it. Using the POSE Value Story from Core Principles—combined with what they learned from their research or their understanding of their ICP (Ideal Customer Profile) and Buyer Personas—top performers craft relevant and compelling POSE Value Stories. These stories may be infused with Ethos, Pathos, and Logos and relevant Value Drivers, for deeper personalization.

Then they deliver their story in interactively, checking and confirming along the way, especially after P and O. They keep the Solution discussion brief (this isn’t the time for a presentation or deep dive into features and benefits). Instead, they simply ask the buyer if it makes sense to explore further.

Top performers also prepare and use POE for voicemails (leaving out solution talk for concise messages), and leverage omnichannel approaches (phone, voicemail, email, LinkedIn, even drop-bys). See Omnichannel Prospecting below for more.

Savvy reps have more than one POSE Value Story ready in case the first doesn’t resonate. If the second falls flat, they ask an open question about the issues the buyer is facing about X (the thing they can help with).

Navigating Disinterest:

Anyone who has ever prospected understands the level of both real and smokescreen or defensive statements buyers use, such as “I’m not interested” or its cousins, “We’re all set” or “We’re working with XYZ and aren’t interested in switching.”

My model and process for navigating disinterest is similar to what I taught in Resolving Concerns. This time, it’s Acknowledge, Clarify, Explore, Recommend, Confirm.

Top performers know that they have a limited time before the window of opportunity shuts on their fingers, so they Acknowledge and Clarify quickly in one breath, asking why they’re not interested with a multiple-choice question instead of an open one:

“If there’s no way for me to deliver value from your perspective, [Name], a lack of interest makes sense. I don’t want to waste your time or mine. Just to ensure we don’t miss a chance to help you get better results, may I ask why you’re not interested? Is this not a problem you need to address? Do you have other priorities? Or is it something else?”

You’ll learn quickly whether the buyer is putting up a smokescreen or has a legitimate reason for not being interested (or not interested right now). If they respond, you can walk through the rest of the model. It will usually end in one of three ways:

1. Pursue: You move forward to a discussion or set an appointment.
2. Nurture: You learn why it’s not the right time and nurture the buyer until it is.
3. Discontinue: The buyer firmly reconfirms their lack of interest and ends the conversation.

Omnichannel Prospecting:

As mentioned earlier, top performers prepare and approach buyers through multiple channels. One differentiating thing that sets them apart is how they connect the dots between channels.

A voicemail using POE might mention an upcoming LinkedIn invite. The LinkedIn invite (with no overt selling) mentions an email coming soon with more detail. The email (perhaps a brief POSE Value Story with social proof and a relevant resource) mentions when you’ll call again. And so on. Each touch builds on the last, creating a connected, seamless experience for the buyer.

Nurturing Prospects:

When buyers aren’t interested right now for a legitimate reason or go quiet after several days of omnichannel outreach, top performers shift into nurture mode. They don’t “check in” or “just follow up.” Instead, they share information that is relevant to the buyer’s role or ideally, to whatever they’re working on.

This mix might include company and product insights, plus other unrelated content the seller believes would be interesting or helpful for the buyer.

“[Name], when we last spoke you mentioned you were working on XYZ. I saw this article in Harvard Business Review and thought you might find it helpful.”

This approach keeps the relationship warm and positions the seller as a helpful resource—not a pest.

Other Modules That Apply

• All of the modules in Core Principles apply to prospecting or new business development.

OPPORTUNITY MANAGEMENT: Mastering the Sales Process – What the Best Do Differently

The Opportunity Management Section teaches the knowledge and skills needed to navigate the sales process successfully and win the opportunities you’ve generated. These are core sales skills that truly differentiate sellers from the average.

Many of the practices in this section also apply to Account Management, and a few can even support Prospect Development. The goal is simple: help you manage deals with precision and confidence so you can close more business.

THE MODULES & DIFFERENTIATORS

Navigating the Buying Process:

 This module is a subset of the Customer Lifecycle and includes two primary differentiators:

Seller Focus on the Buyer’s Journey

• Top performers pay attention to the buyer’s journey—not just their own sales process.

Recognition of Buying Process Exit Criteria (BPEC)

• Each decision maker has specific exit criteria at every stage of their buying process. These criteria must be satisfied before they are willing to move forward. This concept extends the Value Stack’s decision threshold, where the buyer needs enough AIR—Awareness, Interest, and Relationship (trust)—to advance.

Buying Process Exit Criteria represent whatever a decision maker needs to see, hear, feel, understand, or believe in the current stage to proceed to the next. In some stages, all buyers may have the same exit criteria. In other stages, different buyers may have different exit criteria. This is why multi-threaded deals are often called “The Complex Sale.”

Top Performers recognize this and work to:

• Uncover each buyer’s exit criteria in each stage.
• Clarify to ensure they deeply understand it.
• Satisfy the criteria by providing what the buyer needs.
• Confirm their satisfaction intentionally before seeking agreement to move forward.

Sales Call Planning:

Most everyone seems to understand the importance of sales call planning, yet it is often ignored, downplayed, or done half-heartedly. Time and again, strong sales call planning has proven to be a key differentiator for top performers.

 One of the most powerful distinctions? Intentionally including the buyers’ objectives for the meeting. This approach syncs with the concept of Buying Process Exit Criteria mentioned earlier. When buyers feel the meeting is as much theirs as yours —and see your focus on helping them make a great decision—everything gets easier for you as the seller.

Sales Meeting Management:

An A-grade plan bumbled is almost always beaten by a C-grade plan executed flawlessly. That’s the essence of sales meeting management. The ultimate goal, of course, is an A-grade plan executed with discipline and focus.

 With a solid plan in place, top performers act like orchestra conductors—facilitating the meeting as intended. Some key differentiators include:

• Review the plan and confirm whether anything has changed on the buyer’s side.
• Capture key notes, even if you’re recording or using AI transcription, so you can reference them later.
• Keep the meeting on time—and if it’s clear you won’t, call it out and let buyers decide the best course of action.
• Leave time to summarize, including decisions made, open topics, and next steps.
• HAM-BAM (Have A Meeting, Book A Meeting) to avoid the post-meeting scramble of scheduling the next session.

Navigating Discovery (Situation Assessment with COIN-OP):

 The discovery method I teach is the most compelling I’ve seen. (That may sound egotistical but remember that I documented it by observing the best. I didn’t cook it up in my kitchen.)

It leverages COIN-OP back (from Section 1) to frame the Current State (with Challenges, Opportunities, Impacts) against the Desired Future State (with Outcomes and Priorities) with the Needs bridging the gap.

Top performers use this framework to:

• Conduct a Gap Analysis to identify what’s required to close the gap between the two states (the Needs).
• Get buyers to dollarize the Impacts and Outcomes, creating a highly compelling business case—or revealing that the problem isn’t significant enough to tackle (which is equally valuable to know).
• Perform an Impact Analysis to determine the ROI of making the move (comparing Impacts and Outcomes against the cost of the solution).

The questions asked are obviously around the problems that you solve, unless you are a management consultant with an almost unlimited number of things you can do to support your clients.

Discovery done this way is a powerful differentiator. As my friend Kurt Haug says, this framework operates on what he calls the Accordion Principle. It can flex down (squeeze in) to support a simpler, more transactional sale, or flex up (expand out) to support a highly complex and detailed sale. It’s a flexible model that top performers maximize to get the best possible results.

Importantly, these sellers don’t float ideas or present solutions prematurely. They remain patient, build the framework until they confirm NASA and ensure it’s compelling. Later, they refer back to this foundation when presenting or co-creating solutions.

In comparison, average performers leap at the first sign of something they can sell. Top performers lay back, waiting patiently, building the story, almost as if they are setting up bowling pins one by one, so they can knock them down later.

Navigating Opportunity Qualification:

Sometimes it feels like there are more qualification models than car models. The truth is, if it’s a solid model, it almost doesn’t matter which you use, as long as you use it well. That’s where top performers stand out.

 In TCM, I teach starting with NASA—Need And Solution Alignment—meaning you’ve confirmed you can solve their problems. From there, I introduce DM-DC, UT-OOE (which rhymes to make it easier to remember—see the image above).

 Regardless of the exact model, the most critical differentiator is consistent application. I’ve seen MEDDICC implemented with CRM scoring systems where reps rated everything a 4 or 5 on a 1–5 scale—and most of it was nonsense. When managers finally started peeling the onion and digging into the ratings and what was behind them, most of the ratings dropped to 1 or 2.

Having a qualification method is one thing. Using it well is what matters most. And having managers test reality? Priceless.

Navigating the Buyer Landscape:

This is the business version of Pin the Tail on the Donkey.

Start by noting each buyer’s:

• Position/title
• Buying Role
• Value Drivers
• Level of Influence
• Attitude Toward You (including your company and solution)

Then, you map these factors on a chart:

The matrix of level of influence and attitude toward you and your solution allows you to plot your buyers or current customers on the chart, adding the other factors where they are plotted.

This allows you to translate what you see into a tactical action plan to address any potential challenges, such as having a high-influence Decision Maker in the Neutral or Negative zone, or a bunch of Performance Buyers on the chart when you have only communicated about Execution Value.

Top performers map these factors and their relationships and act accordingly. Others assume they know or do nothing.

Co-Creating a Solution:

Whether it’s a simple transactional sale or a complex solution design process (the Accordion Principle applies here—it flexes), co-creation is about engaging buyers in making choices and decisions along the way. This involvement gives them a sense of ownership in the final solution.

Top performers embrace this approach. Others don’t—they may confirm NASA (Need and Solution Alignment) and present to communicate problem/solution fit, but they rarely co-create.

Navigating Communicating Conversations:

 Several critical elements converge here. First, understand that like beauty, value is in the eye of the beholder. What matters is what each buyer values and whether they see that value delivered by your solution.

Key factors include:

• Whether your buyers are Performance, Operational, or Experiential buyers (as shown above).
• The impacts they want to avoid from and the outcomes they seek (from the Situation Assessment).
• Their Value Drivers: Business, Execution, Purpose, and/or Personal.
• What they liked about your POSE Value Story with the Ethos, Pathos, and Logos you wove in.
• Their individual Buying Process Exit Criteria in the current process stage and what they need to move forward.

This brings us back to “Multilingual Selling,” or being able to communicate value in multiple ways about the same solution, tailored to what matters most to each buyer.

Top Performers excel at this. Average sellers do the same thing, the same way, each time, in each stage, with every buyer. And they always message the same way about the solution.

Navigating Commitment:

I avoid the term “closing” because of the baggage from outdated methods and stereotypical closing techniques. Instead, I talk about gaining commitment.

The recommend approach:

• Summarize buyer requirements and how you’ve met or exceeded them.
• Confirm acceptance of your summary.
• Recommend a logical next step and check for confirmation.

It’s mostly about good, human, communication skills. If concerns arise, use the ACCRC model to resolve them, and regain agreement.

No magic formulas. No rolling the pen across the table. No Ben Franklin charts. No Puppy Dog closes. (Although interestingly, Product-Led Selling is a form of the Puppy Dog Close, if you’ve never connected that dot before.)

This works well for interim commitments (along the buying/sales process) as well as for final purchase commitments. Remember HAM-BAM? That’s an example of an interim commitment to schedule the next meeting before leaving the current one.

Other Modules That Apply

• All of the modules in Core Principles apply to Opportunity Management

While not applied to prospecting specifically, most of the modules in the Prospect Development section can be helpful in Opportunity Management.

• The Buying Process is part of the larger Customer Lifecycle
• Researching applies when new decision makers enter the deal.
• Resolving concerns is likely, but you may also need to navigate disinterest occasionally.
• Nurturing individual buyers in various ways can support their journey through their buying and decision-making processes.

ACCOUNT MANAGEMENT: The Long Game – Account Management Excellence

The Account Management section teaches the knowledge and skills needed to purposefully and successfully manage your accounts, whether you are managing a territory, key accounts, or a few strategic accounts.

It’s about:

• Analyzing potential within each account
• Setting logical account objectives based on that analysis
• Developing actionable plans to achieve those objectives.

Account management is the long game—building relationships, creating value, and driving mutual success over time.

THE MODULES & DIFFERENTIATORS

Account Objectives:

It’s hard to hit a target you don’t see. Top performers assess account potential using whatever metrics matter for the business. I teach PCF-L, which stands for

• Past account performance
• Current account performance
• Best-possible Future account performance
• Likelihood of achieving that rosy future, based on what you know today

Then, based on the analysis, the account objective typically falls into one of four categories:

• Grow: Expand the relationship and revenue.
• Retain: Maintain the business when growth potential is limited.
• Reactivate: Reinvigorate an account that has slowed or stopped doing business with you.
• Retire: End the relationship when it no longer makes sense to do business together.

 A fifth objective, Acquire, applies to accounts you want to win rather than current ones.

To remember all five, I use the mnemonic AG-R3: Acquire, Grow, Retain, Reactivate, Retire.

Account Planning:

Like prospect research and sales call planning, top performers develop and maintain active account plans. I teach reps to use Force Field Analysis to assess:

• Driving Forces: the factors moving them toward the desired future state with the account
• Restraining Forces: the factors holding them back.

Things you should know about the account but don’t yet, automatically are listed a Restraining Forces.

Then, they develop plans to:

• Reduce or eliminate restraining forces.
• Add or strengthen the driving forces.

The documentation of these actions becomes your account plan.

This is a very logical, effective process, as long as the plan remains a living document, not something that sits in a drawer or a forgotten file folder, unused or outdated.

Obtaining Referrals:

Consider these stats:

• 84% percent of B2B decision-makers start the buying process with a referral, and companies with referral programs report 71% higher conversion rates. (Source: Heinz/Influitive)
• 91% of customers would be willing to provide a referral to a company or brand they are satisfied with. However, only 11% of salespeople actually ask for referrals (Source: the Dale Carnegie organization)

It’s no surprise that I saw a statistically significant uptick in referral-seeking behavior from the top performers I studied.

Customer Value Reviews:

The difference in the number and quality of Customer Value Reviews (you may think of them as Quarterly Business Reviews or QBRs) between top performers and others in my analyses, was significant. Top performers consistently:

• Plan and conduct these meetings strategically.
• Get the right people involved—on both sides.
• Work to make their Champion and key decision makers the heroes of the story (and when possible, get them to present or report the value from the company’s perspective in front of their bosses).
• Use these meetings to uncover or address any problems or issues, to increase satisfaction and foster loyalty.
• Explore growth opportunities.
• Ask for referrals.

The frequency of these meetings varies. You may hold them monthly, quarterly, biannually, or annually based on account size, importance, and objectives. But top performers always hold these meetings and conduct them using the methods taught in Sales Call Planning and Sales Meeting Management, while adhering to their Account Plan.

The meeting venue may vary from visiting the customer site, to inviting them (periodically) to the rep’s company HQ, to conducting the meeting over Zoom, Teams, Google Meet, or Cisco Telepresence—again, varying based on the size, importance, and objectives for the account.

Other Modules That Apply

• All of the modules in Core Principles apply to Account Management

While not originally presented for account management, most of the modules in the Opportunity Management section and some in Prospect Development are highly relevant. That’s why this section only contains four dedicated modules. It’s not that there isn’t more to managing accounts effectively, it’s just that the other concepts and skills have already been taught. For example:

• Sales Call Planning and Sales Meeting Management
• Conducting a Situation Assessment (from Discovery).
• Navigating the Buyer Landscape.
• Co-creating Solutions.
• Communicating Value (and being able to tell a POSE Value Story).
• Nurturing your key contacts (versus prospects).
• And more.

A Note About Negotiating

If you negotiate price and/or terms, this is a critical skill that is often neglected in sales methodologies. I don’t teach it in the The CoNavigator B2B Sales Mastery course because I believe it is a separate skill set and that selling should be completed before negotiations begin. If you fail to establish value before you negotiate, you will always give away more than necessary. (Savvy and better-trained B2B buyers know this and push sellers to negotiate early and often).

I do, however, have a negotiation program that covers both:

• Tactical negotiation: I call this the “put your hand on your wallet” method. It teaches sellers how to protect themselves from common tactics and gambits.
• Collaborative, win-win, partnership-style negotiating: This is always the goal, though success depends on the buyer’s mindset.

Some buyers want a collaborative partner to forge win-win solutions, and others simply want to wrestle you to the ground. With TCM, you’ll be prepared for both.

Whatever programs you choose, if your sales team negotiates prices and terms, don’t neglect training your sales force on professional negotiation.

My one caution to you: select something focused on B2B buying situations that teaches how to identify, deflect, and redirect tactics or gambits toward a more collaborative, win-win, approach (often referred to as integrative negotiation). Negotiating hostage situations is not the same as a buyer-centric B2B selling environment, nor is using manipulative techniques from the 1980s. While some of these outdated methods are still currently popular, they’re not the direction I believe we should be taking our profession. Caveat emptor.

Closing Thoughts

How did you do? Or, if you’re in leadership or enablement, how are your sellers doing? Does your current sales methodology address all of these differentiators? Does it cover the full customer lifecycle? What are your sellers best at and where can they improve?

Higher levels of adoption of a formal sales process and sales methodology result in higher revenue plan attainment, higher rep quota attainment, and higher win rates. – CSO Insights

Since we know this from multiple sales research studies, it’s worth your attention and focus.

It’s also true that most methodologies only cover part of the customer lifecycle, leaving gaps where sellers “do their own thing” instead of mastering best practices. That means there’s opportunity for improvement—and better results.

In my experience, these mindsets, skills, and behaviors have a cumulative effect. The more things you do well, and the more you demonstrate that you operate in your buyers’ best interest, the more trust and goodwill you build. As a bonus, that trust makes it far more likely you’ll survive a mistake and be forgiven.

I hope this has helped you reflect on how your sales methodology and sales force compare to what the best-of-the-best top performers do differently.

RESOURCES

Research

• The Fifth Annual Sales Enablement Study from CSO Insights (ungated; with the data cited in this newsletter). This includes
  key insights on methodology adoption and revenue impact.
• The Top-Performer Analysis Deck (ungated). This is a summary of the process I used to conduct TPA.

Related Newsletters

• A Collection of 12 Newsletters & 5 Videos on B2B Selling (Process + Methodology)
• How to Ensure Sales Methodology Coverage Across Your Customer Lifecycle
• How to Adapt & Optimize Your Sales Methodology Based on Buyer Context
• What Top-Performer Analysis Taught Me About Adaptive Selling
• Buyer-Centricity is Not an Excuse to Avoid Selling!

Need Advice or Want Help?

Want to improve methodology coverage or boost seller performance?

Connect or DM me on LinkedIn or scroll to the bottom of this page: https://www.mikekunkle.com/services to request a meeting or send me a message.

How to follow my work, connect, or work with me:

• Advisory Services & Coaching Programs: TSR Advisory Services & Coaching (ungated PDF download)
• The Building Blocks of Sales Enablement Book: https://bit.ly/BBofSE
• Sales Enablement Straight Talk Newsletter: Sales Enablement Straight Talk!
• Mike’s Linktree: https://linktr.ee/mikekunkle
• Modern Sales Foundations Blog: https://modernsalesfoundations.com/blog/author/mkunkle/
• Distribution Strategy Group Blog: https://distributionstrategy.com/author/mike-kunkle/
• Sales Effectiveness Straight Talk Webinars: https://bit.ly/MikeKunkle-OnDemand (60 Free Recorded Webinars)
• LinkedIn Articles: http://bit.ly/MK-LinkedInArticles
• LinkedIn Profile: https://www.linkedin.com/in/mikekunkle
• X.com: https://twitter.com/mike_kunkle
• Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/mike_kunkle/
• TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@mike_kunkle
• YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@MikeKunkle/videos (Please Subscribe!)

About Mike

Mike Kunkle is an internationally recognized expert on sales training, sales effectiveness, and sales enablement. He’s spent over 30 years helping companies drive dramatic revenue growth through best-in-class enablement strategies and proven-effective sales systems—and he’s delivered impressive results for both employers and clients. Mike is the founder of Transforming Sales Results, LLC, where he designs sales training, delivers workshops, and helps clients improve sales results through a variety of sales effectiveness practices, sales systems, and advisory services. Mike collaborated with Doug Wyatt to develop SPARXiQ’s Modern Sales Foundations curriculum and also authored their Sales Coaching Excellence and Sales Management Foundations courses. His book, The Building Blocks of Sales Enablement, is available on Amazon, and The CoNavigator Method for B2B Sales Mastery will be published in 2026.

The post B2B Sales Methodology Differentiators: How Does Your Approach Compare to Top Performers? appeared first on MikeKunkle.com.

Sales leaders often chase fast sales training implementations to hit time-to-value targets. The problem? Research shows short programs rarely drive adoption or mastery—especially for a full methodology.

Extended, science-backed sales training using bite-sized learning, spaced repetition, retrieval learning and practice, and weekly manager support (including coaching) delivers far higher adoption. Over 75% adoption is the threshold where quality execution of a sales methodology starts producing meaningful revenue impact. It’s counterintuitive for some—but true.

The paradox is simple: longer implementation timelines generate faster, better, and more sustainable revenue growth because the training actually sticks. Fast doesn’t equal effective. Quality does.

Introduction: The Tension

I’ve had this conversation countless times in boardrooms and strategy sessions. A CFO turns to the Head of Sales and asks:

“How quickly can we get our reps trained?
We need fast time-to-value now.”

I get the pressure. Revenue targets are unforgiving. Boards have expectations. The impulse to move faster is natural—almost reflexive.

But there’s a hidden paradox in that question—one that’s costing companies millions in wasted training budgets and unrealized revenue potential.

The truth?

The sales training implementations that truly move the needle take longer than most leaders want to admit. Not because they’re inefficient, but because lasting behavior change requires time, repetition, and reinforcement.

That’s not opinion. That’s cognitive science.

You wouldn’t expect three weeks at the gym to build lasting fitness. Your sales team’s ability to execute a new methodology deserves the same realistic expectations. The methodology isn’t the gym membership. The methodology is the fitness.

In this article, we’ll explore why the quick-fix approach to sales training fails, the science behind why extended implementation works, when early value actually appears, and why the conversation needs to shift—from time-to-value to adoption-to-value. Because when your sales team truly adopts a proven methodology, everything else follows.

The Time-to-Value Illusion

Let’s start with what most executives think time-to-value means in sales training. It usually sounds like this:

“The new methodology is deployed. The training is complete. How quickly will we see results?”

I know this mindset well—I once worked for a President who asked that almost verbatim. Expectations were set high for the board; quotas were raised—despite my cautions that in a sales force of our size, it could take 18 months to realize the full predicted results. Not that we wouldn’t see early value, but it wouldn’t match the expectations set for the board or what becomes reasonable at 75% adoption with a high level of mastery.

The assumption is linear: training happens, results skyrocket.

• But that’s not how learning works.
• That’s not how behavior change works.
• And that’s definitely not how sales teams work.

Here’s what actually happens when organizations chase fast time-to-value. The methodology gets deployed, the training concludes, and then reps get pulled back into the reality of their day-to-day job. They have deals to close. They have numbers to hit. They have deeply ingrained habits built over years of experience.

Suddenly, the new methodology is competing with everything familiar—years of ingrained habits.

I once saw a company spend over a quarter million dollars rolling out a methodology. Eighteen months later—without reinforcement, cultural alignment, or coaching—they were selecting a new methodology because the first one “didn’t work.”

Without reinforcement, repetition, and manager coaching, reps revert. Research on the forgetting curve—first documented by Hermann Ebbinghaus in 1885 and reinforced by modern cognitive science—shows that without active retrieval practice and spaced repetition, people forget 50–80% of new information within days. That’s not a failure of your reps. It’s human memory.

The real definition of time-to-value should be the point at which your sales team has embedded the methodology deeply enough that it becomes their default behavior—their way of working, their reflex under pressure.

That takes time.
That takes repetition.
That takes manager support.

Sales organizations don’t rise to the level of their goals. They sink to the level of their training and systems.

The hidden cost of fast time-to-value is staggering. A rep trained but not adopting the methodology is a wasted investment. Across a sales force of 50 or 500 people, that wasted potential represents millions in unrealized revenue.

This is why companies with the potential to double revenue (without adding more bodies) rarely achieve their potential. 

And here’s what leaders often miss: they assume that because training happened, adoption happened. It didn’t.

And that assumption costs companies billions annually.

Why Traditional and Fast Sales Training Fails: The Science

Understanding why fast sales training implementations fail requires grasping a few fundamental truths about learning and behavior change.

One-shot Training Doesn’t Overcome Ingrained Habits

Reps didn’t develop their current approach last month. They developed it through years of wins, losses, and lessons reinforced by commission checks. Those neural pathways run deep. A single event—no matter how well-designed—can introduce an idea but cannot embed a behavior.

The Forgetting Curve is Real

Ebbinghaus’ research, reinforced by more than a century of cognitive science research, shows that without reinforcement, knowledge decays rapidly. A 2013 study published in Psychological Bulletin reaffirmed that spaced learning with practice is one of cognitive psychology’s most robust findings.

If you train without follow-up, your people forget.
It’s not weakness. It’s biology.

There’s a Gap between Knowing and Doing

Performance consultants call this the “transfer gap.” Your reps can sit in a training room, understand the concepts, even ace a test. But on a call with a difficult buyer—under pressure to close deals, juggling priorities, exhausted from a long week—that training feels theoretical. Stress pushes them toward what’s comfortable, familiar, and what has worked before (even if it’s to a lesser degree, compared to the new methods).

Frontline Sales Managers are the Critical Multiplier that Fast Implementations Ignore

For over 30 years I’ve said this:

Frontline sales managers (FSMs) are the most overworked and underutilized asset in most organizations.

They are the link between training and behavior change—the coaches who make the methodology stick or allow it to dissolve.

Yet in most fast implementations, managers get a two-hour overview and maybe a quick playbook. That’s not enough to support adoption. That’s not enough to change how managers coach. Quick rollouts often treat managers as passive communicators, not as active coaches who embed the methodology through weekly reinforcement, feedback, and course correction.

Why Quick Programs Create False Confidence or The Danger Dip

After the training event, there’s usually a burst of enthusiasm. Reps try new approaches. Managers are energized. But I commonly see one of two challenges arise.

The Danger Dip

The first is what I call The Danger Dip.

When people try new skills, they usually haven’t achieved mastery yet. This is why practice and coaching are critical—and part of my recommendations—but we know they don’t always happen. So instead, newly trained sellers try the skills, but they don’t execute flawlessly. Performance may dip before it picks up again and eventually exceeds previous levels.

Many methodologies have been abandoned in The Danger Dip.

The Reinforcement Gap

The second issue is what causes the dip—a lack of reinforcement, practice, feedback, and coaching. Without ongoing reinforcement, that initial enthusiasm fades. Leaders often measure adoption in the first few weeks, when enthusiasm is highest and behavior change looks visible. Even with a Danger Dip, some reps—usually top performers—will have success stories. Leaders declare success.

Six months later, adoption has eroded to 40–50 percent (or less). By then, it’s too late to course-correct, and restarting feels harder because people have already decided it “didn’t stick.”

This is why I’ve long called the traditional approach to sales management the “Harder, Faster, Longer, Louder” method.

When numbers start to slip, leaders add more technology, more emails, more calls, more activity. They don’t address the root cause: the methodology isn’t embedded, adoption isn’t deep, and managers aren’t coaching to a unified approach.

More activity without quality execution is waste. It annoys prospects. It erodes trust. And it doesn’t move the needle.

A Differentiated Approach: The Four Levers

So, what does an extended, science-backed sales training implementation look like? It’s built on four foundational elements that work together to transform knowledge into sustainable behavior change.

Bite-Sized Learning

Your sales reps are busy—managing pipelines, taking calls, traveling, and chasing quota.

A traditional approach locks them in a classroom for days or overloads them with massive content modules. Bite-sized learning recognizes that busy sales professionals need manageable chunks of information that fit into their workflow without causing cognitive overload.

Think 15- to 20-minute microlearning modules, not three-day seminars. Think focused topics, not comprehensive “everything-at-once” implementations. This approach respects their time, reduces overwhelm, and makes it practical to weave learning into the rhythm of their work.

Spaced Repetition

This is where the science shines. Spaced repetition means exposing learners to information at expanding intervals. You encounter a concept. You practice it. A few days later, you revisit it. A week later, you apply it in a different context—maybe through Q&A or retrieval exercises. A month later, you retrieve it again under conditions that mirror real selling.

Each retrieval strengthens neural pathways, moving knowledge from short-term to long-term memory—and eventually from memory to automatic behavior. Over a 34- to 36-week implementation, your sales team encounters core concepts multiple times, in varied contexts, with expanding intervals. By week 36, concepts that were new in week 1 have become second nature, while new layers have been added on top.

Retrieval Learning

Passive learning doesn’t work. Listening to a trainer explain a technique doesn’t embed it. Reading a playbook doesn’t make it yours. Retrieval learning forces learners to pull information from memory under conditions that mirror real-world application.

Your reps aren’t just hearing about discovery techniques—they’re asking discovery questions in role plays. They’re not just reading about resolving concerns—they’re responding to concerns in simulations, using the methodology model to resolve them. They’re not just understanding the value-driver framework—they’re writing and delivering business cases using it. This active retrieval under realistic conditions creates much deeper encoding and much stronger transfer to actual selling.

Weekly Manager Support & Coaching

This is the glue that holds everything together. Every week, frontline sales managers reinforce, coach, course-correct, and further embed the methodology. Managers receive training guides, understand which concepts are being reinforced that week, and know how to coach to those concepts. They have processes and questions that guide coaching conversations. They see which reps are struggling and intervene early.

This weekly cadence creates accountability, consistency, and continuous improvement. It also signals to the sales team that this methodology matters, that the organization is serious about it, and that adoption is non-negotiable.

These four elements don’t work in isolation. They’re symbiotic. Bite-sized content is manageable within a spaced repetition schedule. Retrieval learning activities happen throughout those intervals. Manager support reinforces both the spacing and the retrieval. Together, they create a compounding effect. Week by week, behavior shifts. Habits form. The methodology becomes how your team sells, not something they’re trying to do in addition to how they sell.

This isn’t theory—it’s the architecture of adoption.

The Adoption Curve: When Early Value Appears (Weeks 3-5)

One of the biggest misconceptions about extended sales training implementations is that there’s no value until the end—that leaders have to wait 34 weeks for any return on investment. That’s not true. In fact, if you’re not seeing value in the first few weeks, the implementation isn’t working or the methodology is not the right content for your company.

Here’s what the adoption curve really looks like:

Weeks 1 to 5: Early Wins in Specific Skill Areas

Based on how the training is organization and the order of modules, this is contextual. But in the first few weeks, reps and managers should start noticing improvements in discrete areas such as:

• More relevant buyer-centric communication
• Less friction and resistance with buyers
• Better discovery questions and deeper understanding of the buyers’ situation
• Tighter qualification
• Validation of Need And Solution Alignment (NASA)
• Clearer handling of concerns
• More confident value framing

These aren’t subtle improvements. Managers and reps notice them. Call quality scores tick up. Reps report that their discovery conversations feel more productive. This early value isn’t the full methodology. It’s the foundation. But it’s real. And importantly, it proves the methodology works.

Weeks 6–20: Core Skills Embed, Sales Velocity Improves

As you move into the second and third phases of the implementation, the training content builds on that foundation. Early modules are reinforced. New modules layer in. By week 12, your core sales team has been exposed to the fundamental methodology frameworks multiple times, in different contexts.

• Win rates start improving
• Sales velocity improves further
• Forecast accuracy gets better because opportunities are qualified more rigorously

Weeks 21–36: Mastery Phase and Compounding Impact

In the final phase, the methodology isn’t new anymore. It’s embedded. New hires come on board and get immersed into this methodology as the “way we sell.” Managers are coaching with fluency. Coaching conversations have evolved from “learn this” to “how do we refine this in this specific situation?” Revenue impact compounds. By week 24, you’re looking at measurable pipeline and win-rate improvements. By the end of the 36-week cycle, the organization has transformed.

• Adoption rates hit 75–80% or higher
• The methodology is woven into the culture
• Revenue lift is significant

Weeks 37+: The First Real Finish Line

When training ends, the real work begins.

I saw a video recently of a runner who was approaching the finish line. I think it was a steeplechase or half-marathon, so not a short sprint to the finish line. He was confident in his win and began to coast for the final few yards, preparing to cross the finish line with arms raised. When suddenly, much to his surprise, someone sprinted passed him toward the tape.

This reminds me of how organizations take their foot off the gas pedal too quickly for change management projects.

Like a runner who coasted too soon and lost the race, organizations that ease up after training risk losing the transformation.

When the training ends, ongoing coaching, worksheet usage, embedding concepts and form into CRM and workflow, competency gap identification and coaching to close gaps, are all requirements to truly cement a new methodology and transform it into “the way we do things around here.”

I’ve worked with clients across multiple industries and sales force sizes, and this pattern is remarkably consistent. The early value is real, but it’s not the finish line. Early value is the evidence that the method works and the foundation for exponential improvement.

Examples from Past Clients

Let me make this concrete:

• One mid-market software client I worked with saw measurable call quality improvements by week 4. By week 12, their qualification scores had improved to the point that weak opportunities were being eliminated, which freed up rep time for higher-quality deals. By week 24, their win rate had noticeably improved. By the end of their entended implementation, they had increased adoption to 85% and lifted their win rate from 18% to 28%. That’s not a small move. That’s a transformational move.
• A services provider I worked with implemented a new approach to value framing and business case development. By week 5, they started seeing better conversations around value in discovery. By week 12, their proposal templates had evolved and their sales reps were building more compelling business cases. By week 24, their proposal-to-close conversion rate had improved from 22% to 34%. By the end of implementation, that conversion rate had stabilized at 39%, adding over $1.2MM in annual bookings.

Reframe the narrative: Early value isn’t the goal. It’s proof of concept and the springboard for the compounding improvements that follow.

The Research: 75+% Adoption Moves the Needle

The reason I advocate for extended sales training implementation isn’t philosophical. It’s grounded in research and repeated real-world results.

Multiple studies confirm a consistent finding: companies with formal sales processes and methodologies that achieve 75% or higher adoption see statistically significant improvements in revenue plan attainment, individual quota achievement, and win rates.

Let me repeat that because it’s important: this finding shows up across multiple studies, across multiple industries, across multiple types of sales organizations. It’s not a one-off result. It’s a pattern.

The research is clear, but here’s what it also implies: below 75% adoption, the benefit may be marginal. Fragmented adoption means fragmented results. Some reps sell one way, others another. Pipeline forecasting becomes inconsistent. Coaching becomes difficult because there’s no unified framework to coach to. Revenue impact? Minimal.

At 75% adoption, something shifts. The organization moves in alignment. Most of your reps are executing the same core process and methodology. Coaching conversations become consistent. Your managers can focus on helping reps refine and master the approach rather than debating whether they should even follow it. Revenue impact becomes measurable and material. In one study, there was another statistically significant jump at 90% adoption.

Here’s where the time-to-value fallacy becomes obvious.

• A three-day or even three-week sales training implementation might achieve 25% to 50% adoption. Reps use pieces of it. Managers don’t reinforce it consistently. After 60 days, adoption has often slipped below 30 percent. Revenue impact is negligible. You’ve spent time and money on training and gotten minimal return.
• An extended 36-week implementation with bite-sized learning, spaced repetition, retrieval practice, and weekly manager support often achieves over 75% percent adoption. That adoption holds because it’s been embedded through repetition and reinforcement. Revenue impact is material and sustained.

The math is straightforward:

• A 3-week training with 35% adoption equals near-zero ROI.
• An extended program with 75% adoption can equal significant incremental revenue.

The question isn’t the length of the program. The question is adoption rate and the resulting revenue impact.

Reframing the Conversation: The Questions Executives Should Ask

If you’re a sales leader or CEO, I’d like to challenge the questions you’re asking about sales training right now.

• Stop asking: “How fast can our reps use this?”
• Start asking: “How will our reps remember and apply this under real-world pressure?”

The first question assumes that exposure equals adoption. It doesn’t. The second question focuses on the real outcome: sustainable behavior change.

• Stop asking: “What’s the time-to-value?”
• Start asking: “What adoption rate will we achieve, and what’s the resulting revenue impact?”

Time-to-value is a false metric if adoption is shallow. Adoption-to-value is the actual metric that matters.

• Stop asking:“Can we compress this into eight weeks?”
• Start asking: “What support structure will drive adoption? What manager training do we need? What coaching cadence is required?”

Compression usually means cutting the reinforcement. It means reducing manager support. It means hoping reps will stick with the methodology without ongoing coaching. That’s how implementations fail. Change management by decree does not work.

• Stop asking: “When will we see ROI?”
• Start asking: “When will our reps demonstrate mastery, and when will we reach 75+% adoption?”

Mastery and adoption are the leading indicators of revenue lift. If you focus on those, ROI follows naturally.

• Shift the accountability question entirely: “Is our organization committed to the reinforcement and coaching this requires? Or are we looking for a quick fix that won’t stick?”

This is the real question. Because extended implementation requires sustained commitment from leadership, from managers, and from the sales team. If that commitment isn’t there, no sales training will work.

The True Cost of Shortcuts

Let’s talk about what really happens when organizations chase short sales training implementations and quick time-to-value.

Quick-fix implementations create short-lived behavior change, which leads to regression to old habits. Your reps try the new approach for a few weeks. Then, under pressure, with deals at risk, and old habits pulling at them, they revert. They return to what’s familiar, what’s comfortable, what worked before. You’ve paid for training that produced no lasting change.

But here’s where it gets worse: organizations that chase quick fixes often enter a cycle of repeated training initiatives.

• A new methodology gets deployed. It doesn’t stick.
• Three months later, sales leaders look for the next solution.
• Another program gets launched. It also doesn’t stick.
• This cycle repeats every 18–24 months.

Each failed initiative erodes confidence:

• Reps become cynical: “Here we go again—another flavor-of-the-month program that won’t stick.”
• Managers lose credibility: They’re asked to champion yet another initiative that will likely fail like the last one.
• Leaders become jaded: Doubting whether training and enablement can actually move the needle.

Meanwhile, your competitors who implement rigorous methodology correctly are pulling away. They invest in a low, slow implementation. They achieve 80% adoption. By the time your organization is starting its next quick-fix program, their teams have been executing with discipline for nine months. They’re in their mastery phase. Their revenue is growing. Your cycle of failed initiatives continues.

The real cost of shortcuts isn’t the months spent implementing. It’s the repeated investments that never mature, the compounded skepticism, the organizational friction, and the revenue that stays flat while competitors grow.

Shortcuts don’t save time—they waste it.

Implementation Reality Check: Setting Expectations

Let’s be honest: a 34- to 36-week extended sales training implementation is demanding. It requires manager commitment. It requires organizational discipline. It requires patience. It requires senior leadership to keep the initiative in focus—even when competing priorities are screaming for attention.

But here’s what’s equally true:

Lasting behavior change and sustainable performance improvement require a longer-term commitment.

This mirrors change management timelines across industries for organizational transformation. You wouldn’t expect to transform your company’s culture in eight weeks. You shouldn’t expect to transform how your sales team sells in eight weeks either.

Acknowledging the ask is important.

Acknowledging the ask matters:

• Yes, it requires manager time.
• Yes, it requires discipline.
• Yes, it requires organizational patience.

But the payoff—sustainable adoption, predictable revenue lift, reduced churn, improved customer satisfaction—justifies the investment.

Key Milestones

Here’s what I’ve often told clients about the milestones:

• Week 5: Early module wins are visible. Reps and managers see tangible improvement in specific skills. Call quality shifts. Buyer conversations feel more productive. More meetings are set. Leadership gets early proof that the methodology works.
• Week 12: Core methodology concepts have been exposed multiple times in different contexts. Coaching conversations have evolved. Adoption is gaining momentum. Win rate improvements start to emerge.
• Week 24: Pipeline and win-rate improvements are measurable. The organization gains confidence. Momentum builds. This is often the point where leadership stops questioning whether the initiative will work and starts planning how to sustain it.
• Week 36: Methodology is woven into culture. New hires onboard into this methodology as the “way we sell.” Managers coach with fluency. Adoption has reached 75 to 85 percent. Revenue lift is material and compounding.
• Week 37+: Results vary based on the size of the organization, but it can take 24-36 months (not weeks) to completely embed a full-cycle sales methodology into the culture, without risk of bouncing back or reverting to a seller-led, free-for-all approach to selling.

Even conservative financial models show payback within six to nine months when adoption reaches 75% or higher. A $200K investment in a 36-week implementation typically produces millions in incremental revenue by month 12. That’s not speculation. That’s been repeated across organizations of various sizes and industries.

Closing Thoughts

Let’s bring this together.

The time-to-value conversation has been framed wrong. It’s been framed as “How quickly can we deploy training?” when it should be framed as “How do we ensure sustainable adoption—and the revenue impact that follows?”

The Paradox is Real:

• Extended implementations produce faster revenue growth because the training sticks and is used.
• Quick programs promise speed and deliver regression.
• Extended programs demand patience and deliver results.

The real risk isn’t investing 36 weeks in rigorous, science-backed sales training. The real risk is wasting time and money on programs that never embed, adoption that never takes hold, and revenue that stays flat.

You’re not choosing between fast and slow. You’re choosing between training that works and training that disappears.

Here’s My Challenge for You: Audit your current sales training outcomes right now.

• What’s your adoption rate?
• What’s the resulting revenue impact?

If adoption is below 75% and revenue impact is minimal, the answer isn’t faster training. The answer is evidence-based rigor that drives real behavior change and mastery.

The question isn’t whether you have 36 weeks. It’s whether you can afford not to invest them—given the alternative is repeated cycles of training that fail to take hold, adoption that never materializes, and revenue that stagnates while your competitors pull ahead.

Speed feels good. Results feel better.

If you want to have a conversation about how extended, science-backed sales training implementation can transform your sales organization and drive sustainable revenue growth, I’m here. Reach out on LinkedIn or visit mikekunkle.com/services to connect.

Until then, stay focused on adoption. Stay committed to reinforcement. Stay patient with the process. That’s where the breakthrough happens.

How to follow my work, connect, and work with me:

• Advisory Services & Coaching Programs: TSR Advisory Services & Coaching (ungated PDF download)
• The Building Blocks of Sales Enablement Book: https://bit.ly/BBofSE
• Sales Enablement Straight Talk Newsletter: Sales Enablement Straight Talk!
• Mike’s Linktree: https://linktr.ee/mikekunkle
• Modern Sales Foundations Blog: https://modernsalesfoundations.com/blog/author/mkunkle/
• Distribution Strategy Group Blog: https://distributionstrategy.com/author/mike-kunkle/
• Sales Effectiveness Straight Talk Webinars: https://bit.ly/MikeKunkle-OnDemand (60 Free Recorded Webinars)
• LinkedIn Articles: http://bit.ly/MK-LinkedInArticles
• LinkedIn Profile: https://www.linkedin.com/in/mikekunkle
• X.com: https://twitter.com/mike_kunkle
• Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/mike_kunkle/
• TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@mike_kunkle
• YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@MikeKunkle/videos (Please Subscribe!)

About Mike

Mike Kunkle is an internationally recognized expert on sales training, sales effectiveness, and sales enablement. He’s spent over 30 years helping companies drive dramatic revenue growth through best-in-class enablement strategies and proven-effective sales systems – and he’s delivered impressive results for both employers and clients. Mike is the founder of Transforming Sales Results, LLC, where he designs sales training, delivers workshops, and helps clients improve sales results through a variety of sales effectiveness practices, sales systems, and advisory services. Mike collaborated with Doug Wyatt to develop SPARXiQ’s Modern Sales Foundations curriculum and also authored their Sales Coaching Excellence and Sales Management Foundations courses. His book, The Building Blocks of Sales Enablement, is available on Amazon, and The CoNavigator Method for B2B Selling is coming soon.

The post The Time-to-Value Fallacy: Why Adoption Beats Speed appeared first on MikeKunkle.com.