<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">

<channel>
	<title>Marketing On the Web</title>
	
	<link>http://www.marketing-ontheweb.com</link>
	<description>Internet Marketing Services, Huntsville Alabama</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 16:22:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<geo:lat>34.603017</geo:lat><geo:long>-86.542933</geo:long><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/marketing-ontheweb/ZzdE" type="application/rss+xml" /><feedburner:emailServiceId>marketing-ontheweb/ZzdE</feedburner:emailServiceId><feedburner:feedburnerHostname>http://feedburner.google.com</feedburner:feedburnerHostname><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com" /><item>
		<title>Google Adds Sitelinks to Adwords Ads</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/marketing-ontheweb/ZzdE/~3/TyfBl-WoAt4/</link>
		<comments>http://www.marketing-ontheweb.com/google-adds-sitelinks-to-ads-in-adwords/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 16:22:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEM]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketing-ontheweb.com/?p=687</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is very cool and while it wouldn&#8217;t be appropriate for every ad, there are places were this could be very helpful. Sitelinks enable you to link to multiple services within a single ad. Imagine company listings for a business like My SEO firm with direct links to services like Search Optimization, Internet Marketing, and Website Audits. I [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is very cool and while it wouldn&#8217;t be appropriate for every ad, there are places were this could be very helpful. Sitelinks enable you to link to multiple services within a single ad. Imagine company listings for a business like My SEO firm with direct links to services like <a href="http://www.marketing-ontheweb.com/search-engine-optimization/">Search Optimization</a>, <a href="http://www.marketing-ontheweb.com/search-engine-marketing/">Internet Marketing</a>, and <a href="http://www.marketing-ontheweb.com/">Website Audits</a>. I am not sure how this will play into Google&#8217;s quality score algorithm, but I am sure this aspect hasn&#8217;t been overlooked. The downside, it only works when your ad is in the top-most spot:</p>
<p>This image from <a href="http://www.seroundtable.com/archives/021070.html">RustyBrick</a>:<br />
<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/rustybrick/4075180922/"><img class="alignnone" title="Sitelinks in Ads" src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2666/4075180922_79d327d7e0.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="179" /></a></p>
<p>Here&#8217;s where the sitelinks are added in the campaign settings:<br />
<img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-688" title="sitelinks" src="http://www.marketing-ontheweb.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/sitelinks.bmp" alt="sitelinks" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.marketing-ontheweb.com/google-adds-sitelinks-to-ads-in-adwords/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.marketing-ontheweb.com/google-adds-sitelinks-to-ads-in-adwords/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>The Phonebook is Dead</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/marketing-ontheweb/ZzdE/~3/C5VBpHzorcw/</link>
		<comments>http://www.marketing-ontheweb.com/the-phonebook-is-dead/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 16:26:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEM]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketing-ontheweb.com/?p=684</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Increasingly people are going on-line, not only for phone number and addresses, but for reviews and recommendations. Website’s not only give you the opportunity to list the standard phonebook info like you’re address, when you’re open and years in business, but also detailed information and photos about your products and services. You can explain who [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Increasingly people are going on-line, not only for phone number and addresses, but for reviews and recommendations. Website’s not only give you the opportunity to list the standard phonebook info like you’re address, when you’re open and years in business, but also detailed information and photos about your products and services. You can explain who you are and why someone should do business with you. You can post videos not only about your company, but about the work you have performed and of happy customers. </p>
<p>Even my wife, who shunned the digital world including email until a couple of years ago, now spends many hours on-line. As for me, the only time I go to the phonebook is for an older company that I think might not have a web site, and even then, I will go to an online phonebook first. </p>
<p>This article lists the results of a recent study and highlights where people are going for local business information, The article also chronicles the shifts that have occurred over the last three years. <a href="http://searchenginewatch.com/3635350 ">http://searchenginewatch.com/3635350 </a></p>
<p><em>If the phonebook isn&#8217;t dead, it is fading fast.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.marketing-ontheweb.com/the-phonebook-is-dead/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.marketing-ontheweb.com/the-phonebook-is-dead/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Are Meta Keywords Obsolete</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/marketing-ontheweb/ZzdE/~3/J23KJCb-uD0/</link>
		<comments>http://www.marketing-ontheweb.com/are-keywords-obsolete/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 15:40:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[key phrases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[keywords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketing-ontheweb.com/?p=676</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yahoo announced at the SMX East conference yesterday that they were no longer using meta keywords. In the report Yahoo stated that they had announced this earlier in the year - but apparently no one outside Yahoo got the memo. While none of the major engines now support meta keywords, I still recommend using them in all your [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yahoo announced at the SMX East conference yesterday that they were no longer using meta keywords. In the report Yahoo stated that they had announced this earlier in the year - but apparently no one outside Yahoo got the memo. While none of the major engines now support meta keywords, I still recommend using them in all your pages. There are a lot of spiders crawling the web that still use this information to categorize your content and can result in back-links to your site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.marketing-ontheweb.com/are-keywords-obsolete/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.marketing-ontheweb.com/are-keywords-obsolete/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Website Design Recommendations</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/marketing-ontheweb/ZzdE/~3/x9zwQurO6lg/</link>
		<comments>http://www.marketing-ontheweb.com/website-design-recommendations/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 22:28:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[content tips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[designing a website]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketing-ontheweb.com/?p=668</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just read a great article by Ian Lurie at Coversation Marketing titled Things You Don&#8217;t Know About Your Customers. Perhaps more aptly named Things to remember when designing a website, its a great read with clear points we all need to remember. In summary:

Reading onscreen is hard, for everyone.

Use short paragraphs.
Use short lines.
Use wide line spacing and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just read a great article by Ian Lurie at Coversation Marketing titled <a href="http://www.conversationmarketing.com/2009/08/22-things-you-dont-know-about-customers.htm" target="_blank">Things You Don&#8217;t Know About Your Customers</a>. Perhaps more aptly named Things to remember when designing a website, its a great read with clear points we all need to remember. In summary:</p>
<ol>
<li>Reading onscreen is hard, for everyone.
<ul>
<li>Use short paragraphs.</li>
<li>Use short lines.</li>
<li>Use wide line spacing and nice margins.</li>
<li>Use dark text on a light background. </li>
<li>Scrolling up-and-down is OK</li>
<li>Use lists.</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>They browse in an F-shape</li>
<li>They can&#8217;t remember your web address (being at the top of search results for your name means nothing)</li>
<li>They don&#8217;t search for your name (they search for answers to problems)</li>
<li>They don&#8217;t want to log in (or anything standing between them and their goal)</li>
<li>They don&#8217;t want an &#8216;experience&#8217; (simple is better)</li>
<li>They do want your newsletter (make it prevalent and easy to sign-up)</li>
<li>They don&#8217;t care how clever you are. (just the facts please)</li>
<li>They aren&#8217;t enticed by mystery.</li>
<li>They get lost a lot (make navigation easy, redundant, and extend to your 404 pages)</li>
<li>They aren&#8217;t using cell phones  (at least not in big numbers)</li>
<li>They still use Internet Explorer (so be sure it works in IE)</li>
<li>They&#8217;re using big monitors. (so don&#8217;t create 800 X 600 layouts)</li>
<li>They need to want (create desire)</li>
</ol>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.marketing-ontheweb.com/website-design-recommendations/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.marketing-ontheweb.com/website-design-recommendations/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>New Ways to Address Duplicate Content</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/marketing-ontheweb/ZzdE/~3/bDOSpfC_GqQ/</link>
		<comments>http://www.marketing-ontheweb.com/duplicate-content-concerns/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 14:39:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[301 redirects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canonical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[duplicate content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spidering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[www]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketing-ontheweb.com/?p=657</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Duplicate Content has long been an issue with webmasters and is cause for concern because duplicating content dilutes your ranking in search results. Perhaps the most common cause of having duplicate content is in allowing both www. and non www versions of your site to exist. However, another place where I see duplicate content occur [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Duplicate Content has long been an issue with webmasters and is cause for concern because duplicating content dilutes your ranking in search results. Perhaps the most common cause of having duplicate content is in allowing both <a href="/to-www-or-not-to-www-that-is-in-the-url/">www. and non www versions </a>of your site to exist. However, another place where I see duplicate content occur is when a customer has multiple domain names pointing to the same content. When you use multiple domain names, and there are good reasons to do this, you should pick a preferred URL and ensure that any secondary domains are 301 redirected to that URL.</p>
<p>In this video, Google&#8217;s Greg Grothaus does a great job explaining duplicate content problems and solutions ranging from <a href="/tag/301-redirects/">301 redirects</a> to <a href="/canonical-link-tag/">canonical tags</a>.</p>
<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="425" height="344" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/6hSoXutuj0g&amp;rel=0&amp;color1=0xb1b1b1&amp;color2=0xcfcfcf&amp;feature=player_profilepage&amp;fs=1" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="344" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/6hSoXutuj0g&amp;rel=0&amp;color1=0xb1b1b1&amp;color2=0xcfcfcf&amp;feature=player_profilepage&amp;fs=1" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
<p>I have previously blogged about how <a href="/tag/301-redirects/">301 redirects</a> can prevent common problems from diluting the search engine ranking for your site. However, there are however a number of situations that create duplicate content concerns that are more difficult address. Webmasters now have additional tools to deal with duplicate content through <a href="http://https://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/" target="_blank">Google&#8217;s Webmaster Tools</a> panel. Through this addition to webmaster tools, <a href="http://searchengineland.com/google-lets-you-tell-them-which-url-parameters-to-ignore-25925">Google Lets You Tell Them Which URL Parameters To Ignore</a>. This will a great help, especially for many large dynamic sites.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.marketing-ontheweb.com/duplicate-content-concerns/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.marketing-ontheweb.com/duplicate-content-concerns/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Creating Content that Relevant and Reputable</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/marketing-ontheweb/ZzdE/~3/LHL3YBRz-5Y/</link>
		<comments>http://www.marketing-ontheweb.com/creatingrelevant-content/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 12:51:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[matt cutts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[page rank]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketing-ontheweb.com/?p=601</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Matt Cutts at the 2009 WordCamp. In this video he discusses terms like google juice, page rank, and back links, but don&#8217;t get overwhelmed by the jargon. The central theme is creating content that is relevant and reputable. Worth watching.

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matt Cutts at the 2009 WordCamp. In this video he discusses terms like google juice, page rank, and back links, but don&#8217;t get overwhelmed by the jargon. The central theme is creating content that is relevant and reputable. Worth watching.</p>
<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="400" height="220" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="src" value="http://v.wordpress.com/lAZUouJF" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="400" height="220" src="http://v.wordpress.com/lAZUouJF" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.marketing-ontheweb.com/creatingrelevant-content/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.marketing-ontheweb.com/creatingrelevant-content/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Whitehat SEO for WordPress</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/marketing-ontheweb/ZzdE/~3/QYhlFmQoIaI/</link>
		<comments>http://www.marketing-ontheweb.com/white-hat-seo-for-wordpress/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 15:27:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketing-ontheweb.com/?p=596</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Matt Cutts&#8217; Whitehat video from WordCamp 2007 still rings true. While it&#8217;s targeted at WordPress users, it has broad application and conveys an enormous amount of information. The video discusses SEO tips in plain speak &#8211; recommended. Note, he starts with a site that has been banned and gets a bit technical, but quickly moves into [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matt Cutts&#8217; Whitehat video from WordCamp 2007 still rings true. While it&#8217;s targeted at WordPress users, it has broad application and conveys an enormous amount of information. The video discusses SEO tips in plain speak &#8211; recommended. Note, he starts with a site that has been banned and gets a bit technical, but quickly moves into more general territory. The Q&amp;A at the end is very much worth watching.</p>
<p><object id="viddler_34fc548d" classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="437" height="333" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="src" value="http://www.viddler.com/player/34fc548d/" /><param name="name" value="viddler_34fc548d" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed id="viddler_34fc548d" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="437" height="333" src="http://www.viddler.com/player/34fc548d/" allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" name="viddler_34fc548d"></embed></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.marketing-ontheweb.com/white-hat-seo-for-wordpress/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.marketing-ontheweb.com/white-hat-seo-for-wordpress/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Yahoo and Microsoft Deal</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/marketing-ontheweb/ZzdE/~3/F_p8ykrC-OY/</link>
		<comments>http://www.marketing-ontheweb.com/yahoo-microsoft-deal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 15:58:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adcenter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[yahoo marketing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketing-ontheweb.com/?p=583</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The big news in the press today is the Microsoft/Yahoo deal. I have already received questions about this from a couple of clients, so I thought it best to expand here.
In the deal the search brand at Yahoo will remain to be &#8220;Yahoo Search&#8221; but it will be  &#8220;Powered by Bing.&#8221;  There will be no immediate [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The big news in the press today is the Microsoft/Yahoo deal. I have already received questions about this from a couple of clients, so I thought it best to expand here.</p>
<p>In the deal the search brand at Yahoo will remain to be &#8220;Yahoo Search&#8221; but it will be  &#8220;Powered by Bing.&#8221;  There will be no immediate changes however until they get regulatory approval, following approval the integration effort will move forward (expected early 2010).</p>
<p><strong>What about allocating advertising dollars?<br />
</strong>In the deal it appears that some mix of Yahoo Marketing and Microsoft AdCenter advertising will continue.  It was reported that Yahoo ads will continue to run in the Yahoo properties with Microsoft getting 12% of the revenue and some Yahoo ads will be syndicated over the Microsoft network. Bing will run ads on Microsoft properties (and may run some ads on the Yahoo network as well), but the details are unclear at this point. It will take some time for all this to shake out, with conversions rates ultimately determining where ad dollars will need to be spent.</p>
<p><strong>What about optimizing for Bing?</strong><br />
This is really a non-starter, Google&#8217;s market share is so large that doing anything that could compromise your traffic from that engine would be a mistake. Unless Bing&#8217;s market share increases more than just picking up Yahoo traffic, there is really no point &#8211; as long as the feature sets remain similar. If  features emerge that are unique to Bing, and could be supported without impacting your Google traffic, then optimizating for those features would be in order.</p>
<p>Press Release: <a href="http://www.choicevalueinnovation.com/thedeal/pressroom/Default.aspx">http://www.choicevalueinnovation.com/thedeal/pressroom/Default.aspx</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.marketing-ontheweb.com/yahoo-microsoft-deal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.marketing-ontheweb.com/yahoo-microsoft-deal/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>AdWords Search Query Performance Report</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/marketing-ontheweb/ZzdE/~3/5XjRHCjUiFY/</link>
		<comments>http://www.marketing-ontheweb.com/search-query-report/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2009 16:29:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adwords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEM]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketing-ontheweb.com/?p=463</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Search Query Performance report in AdWords is a rich source of information that can help you hone in on the most productive phrases in your campaign. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: x-small; font-family: Arial;"><span style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial">The Search Query Performance report in AdWords is a rich source of information that can help you hone in on the most productive phrases in your campaign. </span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: x-small; font-family: Arial;"><span style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial">If you were bidding on a broad term like &#8220;Marketing&#8221; the report shows all the phrases that were triggered from that term, you might see &#8220;<strong>internet marketing</strong>&#8220;, &#8220;<strong>web marketing</strong>&#8221; or &#8220;<strong>marketing on the internet</strong>.&#8221;  You can then evaluate the click thru rate (CTR), cost per click (CPC) and conversions on that term to determine if it&#8217;s a good fit for your business. The report also helps you identify phrases that might not be good for your business, but are generating clicks and costing you money. Using the information in the report, you can add the phrases that work into your campaign and add negatives to filter out the phrases that don&#8217;t. </span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: x-small; font-family: Arial;"><span style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial">The only issue with the Search Query Performance report has been that Google has always lumped lower volume quires into groups called &#8220;other unique queries.&#8221; This has been a point of contention because it obscures some number of phrases that were successful and hides terms that could be used as ‘negatives’ to remove irrelevant searches for your campaign.</span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: x-small; font-family: Arial;"><span style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial">Google announced that starting Tuesday, May 19, 2009 the Search Query Performance report will show all queries that resulted in a click… (Yeah!)<br />
</span></span><span style="font-size: x-small; font-family: Arial;"><span style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial"><a title="blocked::http://adwords.blogspot.com/2009/05/enhanced-search-query-performance.html" href="http://adwords.blogspot.com/2009/05/enhanced-search-query-performance.html"><span style="color: #800080;">http://adwords.blogspot.com/2009/05/enhanced-search-query-performance.html</span></a> </span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.marketing-ontheweb.com/search-query-report/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.marketing-ontheweb.com/search-query-report/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Does Your Site have a Google Penalty</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/marketing-ontheweb/ZzdE/~3/i40G9Bc6jew/</link>
		<comments>http://www.marketing-ontheweb.com/google-penalty/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 03:03:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google penalty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[webmaster tools]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketing-ontheweb.com/?p=457</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is often hard to tell what is a real penalty as there can be may causes for your content to drop in the search results. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is often hard to tell what is a real penalty as there can be may causes for your content to drop in the search engine result pages (<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SERP" target="_blank">SERPs</a>). There are things that should be obvious, like changes in SERPs that co-inside with changes you made to the site. However, often results don&#8217;t directly co-inside with changes and therefore it can be difficult to track back.</p>
<p>It can be challenging to discover if:</p>
<ul>
<li>You&#8217;ve got a true penalty</li>
<li>You&#8217;ve been outranked according to the current algorithm</li>
<li>It&#8217;s a Google bug (from algorithm tweaks)</li>
</ul>
<p>Simple Checks Include:</p>
<ol>
<li>Is your robots.text page restricting access?</li>
<li>Has an errant noindex or no-follow tag found its way to a section of your site?</li>
<li>Have you checked Google&#8217;s webmaster tools for error messages?</li>
<li>Have you checked WebmasterWorld to see if recent changes to the algorithm are effecting others?</li>
</ol>
<p>Props to &#8220;tedster&#8221; on the <a href="http://www.webmasterworld.com/google/3490672.htm" target="_blank">webmaterworld thead</a>, this list is an excerpt from an older posting of his:</p>
<p>Additional checks:</p>
<ol>
<li>Do your pages show with a site:example.com search?<br />
If they did once and they do not now, this is most likely a ban &#8211; the most extreme kind of penalty. It&#8217;s becoming quite rare to be completely banned rather than penalized &#8211; usually those who are banned know what they&#8217;ve been doing. Technical problems with your site, or some times Google may be at fault.</li>
<li>Does your site still rank #1 for a search on your domain name example.com?<br />
If so, but your other important search rankings ALL slipped badly, this is often a sign of a penalty. Study up on the posts in our <a title="www.webmasterworld.com/google/3269983.htm" href="http://www.webmasterworld.com/redirect.cgi?f=30&amp;d=3490672&amp;url=http://www.webmasterworld.com/google/3269983.htm" target="_top">Hot Topics area</a> for ideas.</li>
<li>Does a search for relatively unique phrases taken from your title tags return your URL relatively high?<br />
If so, but your principle search rankings have dropped out the bottom, you may have lost the power of a good number of your backlinks. This is not necessarily a true penalty, but if you have been a part of some backlink scheme, even unwittingly, you may have been penalized for it.</li>
</ol>
<p>Also, check any outbound links on your pages to be sure that the site they point to is still what you intended. Other domains can change ownership (or just change their conduct) and become part of a &#8220;bad neighborhood&#8221;. If others also have access to your site, be sure that no hidden content has been added without your knowledge, especially hidden links.</p>
<p>Other good posts on the subject:</p>
<ul>
<li><a title="Link to Do I Have a Google Penalty?" href="http://www.seroundtable.com/archives/020037.html">Do I Have a Google Penalty</a>?</li>
<li><a href="http://www.webmasterworld.com/google/3490672.htm" target="_blank">Am I penalized? What type of penalty do I have</a>?</li>
<li><a href="http://www.webmasterworld.com/google/3913644.htm" target="_blank">Diagnosing a possible penalty</a></li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.marketing-ontheweb.com/google-penalty/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.marketing-ontheweb.com/google-penalty/</feedburner:origLink></item>
	</channel>
</rss>
