After a remarkable 4th World Championship for Sebastian Vettel with Red Bull, the F1 rules (and engines) changed once again, but ushered in a period of sustained Mercedes AMG and Lewis Hamilton dominance no one really anticipated. And so the Formula One saga continues, with the ebbs and flows the sport has witnessed for nearly seven decades.
— Read on www.f1-grandprix.com/

I am rather proud of this recent update to my (one time noteworthy) Web history of Formula One motor racing — Formula One Art & Genius. Only a few will note the irony of these two photos.

The move is part of a broader shift away from labeling people and towards labeling behavior
— Read on www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2013/04/02/ap-drops-illegal-immigrant-from-stylebook/

And I completely missed this. It answers the question of “who made it not PC to say ‘illegal alien.'”? Certainly not Phil.

https://youtu.be/_61hzuGGJX0.

The company that built the first graphical Web browser — then called Mosaic but later changed to Netscape — became one of the most valuable corporations in history. It boasted that Netscape Navigator was the “Killer App” of the Internet; software that would “change everything.” (And so valuable they gave it away for free to help finance the fist mega-IPO of the Internet era.)

We are now far, far removed from those heady first years of the Internet era. Not only have digital interactions become routine and fully integrated into the daily lives of a huge proportion of the world’s population, but the innocent, life-affirming qualities that made the Web so exciting in its embryonic days have faded into a sea of spam, fake news, trolling sites, gaslighting, private dark webs and VPNs, and — most sadly of all — the walled, insular gardens of Facebook, Twitter, Instagram and other social media networks.

It didn’t have to be this way. Yet having participated in this digital world since its pioneering days, I am now fully convinced that social media is running the Killer App. Social media has become political media. It is tearing society apart, coarsening civil discourse, undermining the essential communicative purpose of the Internet, and causing serious and growing societal problems: from revenge porn suicides and social isolation to depression, political divisiveness and rapidly increasing “smartphone addiction.”

National Unfriend Day. That did it for me. The coup de grace. I’ve had it with social media, and I think you know why.

There’s been a lot of talk recently about the supposed power of tech companies. They’re not the problem. Apple, Google, Facebook and the like can’t do anything other than seduce us with cool toys. We’re the ones letting 140 or 280 characters and “likes” and “retweets” rule our attention and emotions. The number of times I have been attacked for posting political-related articles in the past year alone is impossible to count. Old friends say things on social media they would never utter IRL or to one’s face, but on social media it is deemed acceptable to call someone racist, misogynist, a “disgusting human being” (that’s literally what I’ve been termed by some of my former leftist “friends”) and even more toxic labels based on a 10-second reaction to a single, out-of-context sentence.

In the South they call that “hateful,” but on Twitter and Facebook it is encouraged by the echo-chamber of like-minded #socmedia friends whose intertwined feeds are selected by faceless, AI-powered algorithms displaying only content that reinforces and enables preexisting world views. Social media is a “toxic mirror.” We have become a nation divided by social media. On Twitter and Facebook, today, everyone is a Donald Trump!

This is the precise opposite of the Internet’s original promise and function. And it’s changing relations among people quicker than our culture and families can adapt. How many times have you been in a restaurant and seen everyone swiping on their smartphones instead of interacting? How many presentations have you given where the audience is staring at its hands instead of the speaker? How many children and Millennials only know the time by looking at their phone and don’t even understand what a doorbell is anymore? How many times have you — like me, as well — obsessively checked your social media feeds to see whether someone has accepted a friend request, whether your follower count has gone up or down, or whether @jaketapper “liked” your tweet? Who among us has not suffered from social media-fueled anxiety, where from everyone else’s posted images it seems like all your friends lead idyllic lives in perfectly happy families?

The Internet is rewiring brains and social relations. Could it be producing a civilization nervous breakdown?

— wretchardthecat (@wretchardthecat) November 17, 2017

How many marriages, engagements and relationships are being ruined by social media? The “average” person now checks their phone 28 times a day. That’s at least once an hour…and more than 10,000 times a year. It’s alarming, to say the least. The generation of young people born after 1995 is far more likely to experience mental health issues than its predecessors. So many more teens, in such a short period of time, feel depressed, attempt suicide and commit suicide —  because of the sudden ascendance of the smartphone. Social media and smartphone addiction may well be designated as a mental health disorder.

We’ve gone from an era when ideas spread comparatively slowly, to one in which social media allows them to spread “virally” like wildfire. And the combination of social media friends who reinforce existing prejudices and exaggerate differences among people and social groups is creating a new undercurrent of indoctrination. When all one’s “friends” believe the same thing, people are endowed with total conviction in their rectitude and moral superiority. On social media, we are all Islamic terrorists, combining “appalling ignorance” with “absolute conviction.”

A young man — so perpetually glum that he had been nicknamed “Smiley” — was one of the true believers, someone who in Limbert’s eyes embodied Iran’s “New Man,” appalling ignorance combined with absolute conviction.

Excerpt from Bowden, Mark, “Guests of the Ayatollah” (Grove Press 2006).

That’s a description of one of the Iranian “student” hostage takers in 1978. It fits the majority of folks interacting on social media today. The Twitter-fueled “Green Revolution” of 2009 is, like, so yesterday. The culture of social media is divisive, not inclusive; elitist and intolerant, not democratic; partisan, polarized and contumacious, not uplifting and universal. Social media today is fundamentally anti-social at its core.

Now I’m hardly a fragile, progressive snowflake or jealous. I was one of the first 1,000 LinkedIn members and joined Twitter in the summer of 2007, way before most of you had even heard of a “tweet.” And I’ve put up some pretty impressive numbers in my nearly 12 years on social media, 15 years blogging and 23 since hand-coding one of the first 5,000 “home pages” on the Web. (Of course, hardly anyone has, or even remembers, home pages, and the vast majority of social media users think a Tumblr feed is a blog!) All organic. Never bought a follower. So don’t blame this rant on sour grapes.

Will a future generation look back 10, 20, or maybe 100 years from now and wonder, mystifyingly, why a generation of humans believed in these social media platforms despite mounting evidence that they were tearing the culture apart — being used as terrorist recruitment tools, facilitating bullying, driving up anxiety and undermining our elections? I don’t know, but definitely agree with a recent Vanity Fair contributor that “the end of the social media era can’t come soon enough.” Some have begun to ponder how much time on social media is “too much.” For me, it is now any time.

Eric Schmidt of Google is often credited with saying that “the Internet is the first thing that humanity has built that humanity doesn’t understand, the largest experiment in anarchy that we have ever had.” Well, for this Internet pioneer, that anarchy has produced today’s Frankenstein monster of social media. I am through with it.

“Within a month of the Warren Commission’s official finding that Oswald was the lone assassin, public trust in federal government began a steady 54-year decline. Today, it’s at a near-historic low.”

How different America would be if this man had not been murdered and with his death our idealism stolen forever. How much better off we would all be had JFK been able to follow through on his promise to “break the CIA into 1,000 pieces and scatter it to the winds.” And how beautiful a world we would live in had the vision of his 1963 American University speech (“A Strategy of Peace”) come to pass—”not merely peace in our time, but peace for all time”:

“What kind of peace do I mean and what kind of a peace do we seek? Not a Pax Americana enforced on the world by American weapons of war. Not the peace of the grave or the security of the slave. I am talking about genuine peace, the kind of peace that makes life on earth worth living, and the kind that enables men and nations to grow, and to hope, and build a better life for their children—not merely peace for Americans but peace for all men and women, not merely peace in our time, but peace in all time.”

Death Spiral: Humana Completely Abandoning Obamacare Marketplaces After 2017 – Guy Benson

Have not posted to this blog in so long, I’m not sure if I can still do it. ? The reign of socmedia is fully installed.

Confusion and a serious strategy error cost Mercedes’ Lewis Hamilton a shot at winning the race, giving Ferrari’s Vettel the opening he needed — together with surprisingly quick race-trim pace and a new SF15-T car that seems far easier on its tires than the Mercedes W06 — to capture a remarkable GP victory. 

 Lewis Hamilton rues strategy and ‘confusing’ radio at Malaysian GP | BBC Sport 

 After holding onto his lead from pole position and moving out to a healthy gap after just a few laps at Sepang International Circuit on Sunday, Hamilton looked certain to claim his second win of the season. However, following a Safety Car period on lap five sparked by Marcus Ericsson’s spin into the gravel, Mercedes switched to a three-stop strategy that left both of its drivers struggling throughout the race.

Incredible shot! @ScuderiaFerrari embrace Sebastian Vettel after picking up the team’s first #F1 race win since 2013. pic.twitter.com/gLbm9Gmvd6— Yas Marina Circuit (@ymcofficial) March 29, 2015

Towards the end of his third stint, Hamilton was bearing down on Vettel in first place, and had hoped to switch to medium tires for the final stint that would give him a large pace advantage over the German driver, who would by then be on harder, slower and more worn primes. That’s when things went bad.

“There was a bit of confusion in the car. That’s always not good. When people speak to you in the corner, that’s really hard. They’re shouting at you and you’re like ‘what the hell’s going on?’ and it’s easy to lose focus.”

— Lewis Hamilton —

Astonishingly, Hamilton was fitted with prime tires at his last spit top, prompting him to bark to his team over the radio: “This is the wrong tire man!”

The hole was dug in that initial Safety Car period. Mercedes evidently believed that the superior performance we’ve seen from the W06 thus far in 2015 would have made the difference over the duration of the 56-lap race. It was a fatal miscalculation. Mercedes’ executive director Paddy Lowe acknowledged the team’s decision to pit early and switch to primes cost Hamilton time he was just unable to make up. “The advantage this gave to Ferrari on their two-stop strategy, and the time we lost in traffic in the first laps after the Safety Car, left us with a gap to Sebastian that proved too much of a challenge for us to recover,” Lowe said. The lap charts prove it. By the time Hamilton had passed Sergio Perez, Carlos Sainz, Romain Grosjean and Nico Hulkenberg, Vettel’s lead was 10 seconds. That 10s gap was essentially the same as the ending margin of victory. 

 How Mercedes’ Safety Car strategy backfired | F1 Fanatic

The 2 stop #F1 tyre strategy for #MalaysiaGP closely matched with #Vettel & @ScuderiaFerrari winning strategy! pic.twitter.com/uXracwjewr

— Pirelli Motorsport (@pirellisport) March 29, 2015

But performance still played a major role. Ferrari had demonstrated superior long-run pace during Friday practice and although there was no direct comparison with Mercedes on the hard tire, it was clear that the Silver Arrows were burning up their option tires quicker than the Ferraris, hence Vettel’s two opening stints on the medium tire that set up Sunday’s win. In contrast, Hamilton could be heard complaining that his hard tires weren’t lasting and later pulled out of his third stint — on medium-compound options — after just 14 laps. Vettel’s first stint with options, in contrast, was significantly longer at 18 laps.

Mercedes chief Toto Wolff admits Sebastian Vettel’s #MalaysianGP win was a “wake-up call”. #F1 http://t.co/WvYrK9qtkm pic.twitter.com/oOF3LMQ0l5

— AUTOSPORT (@autosport) March 30, 2015

Ferrari technical director James Allison confirms that tire wear was a significant factor in the win. “Our tires worked well on Friday. It gave us the confidence to know we could go deep into the race on that first stint. So we didn’t have to make that early stop. That allowed us a relatively easy passage past them.”

According to Sky Sports F1’s Martin Brundle, an indication came at the start of Saturday qualifying. “When Mercedes went out on the medium compound in Q1 it pretty much showed their hand that they were going to three-stop and that they preferred the hard compound tire,” he said. “I think at that point Ferrari thought ‘hang on, we have a great chance here.’”

Five questions to ask after Sebastian Vettel’s Malaysia GP win | Sky Sports F1 News 

Of course, Seb’s skills had a lot to do with that. If the ultimate measure of a driver’s performance is his teammate, Vettel has cause to be grateful for the presence of Kimi Räikkönen, who had seemed just as strong as the weekend got underway but ultimately proved luckless. It’s an attribute all great champions need and although it’s still the early days of this new F1 season, the feeling already is that the change has done Sebastian good, something has clicked and Vettel has found his mojo again!

One of the common symptoms of this injury is “inability or difficulty in turning the forearm (palm up to palm down or vice versa).” Thought it was my wrist but I was wrong. Going to do wonders for my fitness regime, I’m sure. ;-0

Heading to Nationals Park on this New Year’s Day for the NHL Winter Classic. Watching from the Troutman Sanders suite (Jefferson 62). Except there’s a risk of sun delay!

Check out the very cool time lapse video below to see the transformation of Nationals Park from baseball to ice hockey.

Everyone by now has heard the rhetoric, foreign policy debate and Hollywood gossip surrounding the massive data breach at Sony Pictures Entertainment, reportedly engineered by the government of North Korea. While its immediate impact affects popular culture — withdrawal of the film The Interview from its U.S. premiere and theatrical exhibition — far less discussed have been the likely effects of the high-profile intrusion and theft on cybersecurity issues at the corporate officer and Board of Directors level.

For five reasons, this episode may well (and to this blogger, should) turn out to be a tipping point in the adoption by corporate boards and officers of strong cyber threat prevention, detection and remediation practices.

1. Corporate IP and Trade Secrets Are Valuable. In addition to the internal and embarrassing hacked emails, the Sony Pictures cyber intruders also absconded with the script of a forthcoming, new James Bond film along with internal Sony P&Ls, and actual expense compilations, for movie productions. These are intellectual property (IP) and very sensitive trade secrets, different and far more valuable corporate assets than routine customer social security or credit card information; they represent the results of R&D and creative risk-taking, thus directly undercutting profitability, and reflect non-public business information subject to extremely limited distribution. Per-picture budgets and profitability, for instance, have been a huge Hollywood issue for decades, with writers, stars and directors all jockeying for a share of profits but largely lacking documentation of actual profit margins. That’s bad enough for Sony, but imagine (as a hypothetical) that hackers manage to steal the digital plans for Boeing’s next commercial aircraft or source code for Microsoft’s next release of Windows or the even more secret formula for Coca-Cola? Those jewels of corporate intellectual property could be the Chernobyl of cyber breaches if hacked by competitors, extortionists or both.
2. Plaintiffs Have Standing to Sue. The federal courts to date have largely been unresponsive to consumer class actions arising from merchant and retailer data breaches, on the theory that until stolen data is actually used against a victim, he or she has not been directly injured and thus lacks standing to sue. That is not the case where it is corporate IP that is hacked, because (a) the stock market quickly adjusts share prices downwards for the costs of legal defense and likely loss of sales revenue, and (b) stockholders by definition have standing to sue where share prices fall, which is classic financial “injury.” This means that claims under the federal securities laws for misleading statements or lack of disclosure related to cybersecurity incidents, as well as so-called derivative actions against directors and officers for negligence or breach of fiduciary duty, are far more likely to be filed and make it to the merits, that is trial. The 100+ lawsuits against Target for its late-2013 consumer breach could understate the claims potentially leveled against Sony management and directors by an order of magnitude.
3. Insurance May Not Cover the Losses. Many corporate boards are indemnified by the company, for all but malfeasance or gross negligence, which increases the costs of corporate legal claims arising from cyber breaches. Yet those costs may or may not be covered by ordinary liability and “errors or omissions” insurance policies. The coverage question is complicated, but it’s a fervent area of insurance law with lots of room for missteps, on both sides. Without insurance coverage, management and corporate boards will be forced to take significant charges or reserves against earnings to cover those potentially huge expenses, which only reinforces the financial and likely stock price impacts of hacking.
4. State-Sponsored Corporate Hacking is Warfare. The major cybersecurity public policy issue in 2014 was whether threat information should be shared between the private sector and government. Legislation (the Cybersecurity Information Sharing Act or “CISA”) to jump-start threat sharing, by creating public records release and antitrust exemptions, failed in the U.S. Senate. Now it seems that the most immediate result of the Sony Pictures breach will be a non-partisan push for enactment of that bill ASAP, with expansion to include the Department of Defense as well as DHS being rumored. The Washington Post has already reported that “As the fallout from the cyberattack against Sony Pictures grows amid reports that the hack may be linked to the North Korean government, lawmakers and the Obama administration are calling on Congress to focus heavily on cybersecurity legislation after the holiday recess.” Where the cyber threat is from a foreign state, in other words, even the robust capabilities available in private sector data protection are likely insufficient to robustly guard a company’s IP. State-sponsored hacking is corporate espionage on steroids.
5. Even Embarrassing Stuff Has Big Legal Consequences. State law has established a number of torts related to the publication of true but embarrassing, or private, information on people, often compiled into a catch-all “invasion of privacy” moniker. Ordinarily it is the publisher or speaker who is liable and the target of litigation claims. But those same torts apply to anyone with a duty of care to the plaintiff, and it is difficult to see how a company does not have a duty to keep private and potentially embarrassing email discussions reasonably safe from theft by outsiders. The legal framework is complicated by more archaic doctrines of ownership of corporate email content, but the risk is extremely large where the industry is a lucrative one. Silicon Valley executives make as much, if not more via stock and options, than their Hollywood counterparts. So the consequence is that more of the privacy tort claims already filed against Sony will become commonplace if internal corporate communications — as the publicity surrounding Sony Pictures executives’ racially insensitive jokes suggests clearly — become a target of opportunity hackers looking for blackmail evidence.

Like all prognostications, these are predictions, not guarantees. But the one certain thing is that after the Sony Pictures breach, corporate boards and management will be paying much closer attention to cybersecurity, at the very least because it is now hitting them where it huts the most: in the pocketbook and bank account.

 Note: Originally written for and reposted with permission of my law firm’s Information Intersection blog.
 

Saw this on Facebook: Group of teenagers checking their cell phones while sitting next to Rembrandt's "Night Watch" pic.twitter.com/6h7VU0i4HB

— Matthew Fraser (@frasermatthew) December 6, 2014

“My cousin and I just caught ourselves a new fishy friend! (She hooked it and started the reel-in, I brought it home). A beautiful fish but we named it ‘Dinner.’ haha!”

My "new" 2007 Boxster now has LED fog lights. Wow!! pic.twitter.com/PWeUrfQzxW

— Glenn Manishin (@glennm) September 20, 2014

Loretta and the Big Blue Ball – YouTube http://t.co/y9fzc0w85c

— Glenn Manishin (@glennm) August 31, 2014

Just delivered…beautiful 2007 Boxster S (987). Yeah!! pic.twitter.com/xZCIK5Hs6k

— Glenn Manishin (@glennm) August 28, 2014

George Washington Memorial Pkwy in Alexandria, VA, United States | Running Map | MapMyRun.
 

10 weeks ago I could hardly run a mile. So I’m rather proud at having finished my first 5K race Sunday morning in the altogether respectable time of 36:09 (11:36/mile), albeit 144th place. ;-)  Here are the results.

AOL 5k | Potomac River Running Store.

• RT @LegalZoom: Growth hacks from some of the world’s most successful #tech #entrepruners (Via @EntMagazine) http://t.co/294cae6Jwj 21:46:02, 2014-04-30
• So airline tracking tech sucks in flight _and_ on the ground. Computer problems halt departures in SoCal. http://t.co/YPDLc8xKUW 07:50:14, 2014-05-01
• Narendra Modi accused of breaking India’s election rules by taking selfie http://t.co/xD3NY37Z3D via @guardian 08:39:29, 2014-05-01
• Why you’ll hate the Internet ‘fast lane’ http://t.co/EY29m2CsbM 08:43:20, 2014-05-01
• FCC chairman ‘won’t hesitate’ to regulate broadband like a utility if proposed rules fail http://t.co/MZXcc0WBR1 08:50:14, 2014-05-01
• RT @BBCSport: Imola circuit falls silent at Ayrton Senna’s memorial service on the 20th anniversary of his death http://t.co/JS9IRYcPsX #bb… 11:10:38, 2014-05-01
• RT @MercedesAMGF1: “He was a genuine hero who inspired people from all over the world” @LewisHamilton on #Senna: http://t.co/AOrMF1jqPH htt… 11:31:57, 2014-05-01
• RT @McLarenF1: A stunning pole position & an out of body experience – Monaco ’88 in numbers: http://t.co/y8JbOi2FRN #RememberSenna http://… 11:32:25, 2014-05-01
• Twitter stock tanks. It’s not the ‘next Facebook’ http://t.co/HWiVZFy96R 11:55:37, 2014-05-01

• A series of free legal seminars. Come one by! Cybersecurity & Information Management Series | Troutman Sanders LLP http://t.co/X55bcxDg4y 13:33:05, 2014-05-01
• A Eulogy for Twitter – The Atlantic http://t.co/FdD37yIhnC 15:05:35, 2014-05-01
• RT @GaryShapiro: Frustrating news for those interested in stopping #PatentTrolls. More delays over fee-shifting. Senate: x 2 act http://t.c… 15:09:08, 2014-05-01
• RT @DataPrivacyNtwk: Microsoft has issued a fix for the major bug in Internet Explorer and Windows XP. http://t.co/b6db3kD5lA @IE 15:09:51, 2014-05-01
• RT @BarbagalloPaul: What does FCC’s #netneutrality proposal mean to cable groups? @bbaschuk provides analysis | http://t.co/KZDVtPb41C 15:12:01, 2014-05-01
• Why isn’t free Wi-Fi everywhere? http://t.co/G2NOiXOMiH 18:05:13, 2014-05-01
• As Netflix Resists, Most Firms Just Try to Befriend Comcast http://t.co/eqcQqjWNKv 07:35:57, 2014-05-02
• Rogue Amoeba’s Paul Kafasis on Consumer Recording, Provocative Branding, & Endangered Gizmos http://t.co/X1o51kAVKr 07:51:43, 2014-05-02
• Tech Tuesday: Litigation, Legislation and Regulatory Protectionism http://t.co/QUBYSdO12E 07:52:14, 2014-05-02
• Frustration Rises Over Crowdfunding Rules http://t.co/i5EHa549bt 09:05:16, 2014-05-02
• Where Does Your Carry-On Go? The Unspoken Rules of the Overhead Bin. http://t.co/shQBAtPILf 12:10:32, 2014-05-02
• House speaker calls for special probe into Benghazi http://t.co/pBrrkw2mvL via @USATODAY 13:09:49, 2014-05-02
• Foursquare Bets That Two Apps Are Better Than One http://t.co/UOrGtcCpaN 13:12:18, 2014-05-02
• RT @rgranat: #futurelaw @codeXStanford @freelawproject has indexed 2.5 opinions and new tools available for free http://t.co/lSQxUn0YgC
  Who… 13:13:21, 2014-05-02
• First burger lunch at week 10 of P90X! (@ Penn Quarter Sports Tavern – @pqst w/ 2 others) http://t.co/jDLxQQhrs9 13:16:05, 2014-05-02
• Twitter Is Not Dying. It’s on the Cusp of Getting Much Bigger. http://t.co/sXnm3bFErH via @slate 13:58:29, 2014-05-02
• Apple still dominates tablet market despite losing share to Samsung http://t.co/O8wmz8wD9Z 14:20:02, 2014-05-02
• RT @MrSteveMatchett: I was only thinking of Nigel yesterday: remembering the tears in his eyes when the pit lane personnel became aware of … 14:34:03, 2014-05-02
• Lobbying Efforts Intensify After FCC Tries 3rd Time on Net Neutrality http://t.co/tU9kByMk65 15:05:10, 2014-05-02
• Spacey: “You’re Stealing It” (Because We’re Not Selling It) http://t.co/aqxRtUpuZD 16:31:34, 2014-05-02
• RT @DisCo_Project: “Spacey has previously said…that piracy can be reduced by giving the people what they want, when they want it” http://t.… 16:34:02, 2014-05-02
• RT @hmintz: Apple-Samsung jury careening toward Friday Happy Hour. Will they, or won’t they? Maybe they need a weekend at the beach to thin… 17:34:25, 2014-05-02
• RT @jaredcorreia: RT @rocketmatter: #Biglaw’s Eroding Edge: http://t.co/r6WAjmUILJ | via @atlblog 17:35:04, 2014-05-02
• Apple, Facebook, others defy authorities, increasingly notify users of secret data demands http://t.co/86ENoCyvA9 17:50:13, 2014-05-02
• S.F. mental health code-a-thon. http://t.co/of8pcrUqYL 20:04:48, 2014-05-02
• I’m at 3920 8th Street South (Arlington, VA) http://t.co/vvThOjwXbh 20:16:37, 2014-05-02
• RT @DarrenKavinoky: Attorney: Why making Sterling sell is disturbing | http://t.co/2TFPGoBA48 http://t.co/reZ1l1ioc5 via @hlntv 21:03:53, 2014-05-02
• RT @inafried: Apple says it has found one patent on one product that it believes it should have gotten some damages. Samsung says zero dama… 21:04:12, 2014-05-02
• RT @profmikecarrier: Timing of jury verdict in #appsung shows power of seemingly self-imposed Friday afternoon deadline. #MustEnjoyWeekend 21:04:31, 2014-05-02
• RT @obrien: Samsung, in symbolic win, ordered to pay Apple $119.6 million in damages http://t.co/feYxnANpMK via @latimes #appsung 21:04:49, 2014-05-02
• @glennm‘s twitter weekly is out! http://t.co/s1y4VmOiMm Stories via @alisternburg @coopeydoop @ABAesq 22:44:34, 2014-05-02
• Yeah!! Grammar Geekery: It’s time to admit that “data” is singular http://t.co/hXsqMzZfXs 11:08:20, 2014-05-03
• Feuding tech trade groups reach settlement over poaching http://t.co/U2PVxSSaJp 11:09:27, 2014-05-03
• I’m at Dulles Toll Road | Toll Booth (Tysons Corner, VA) http://t.co/A7jJtpvlfD 12:45:39, 2014-05-03
• Law School Job Data Shows Wide Gulf Between Elite and the Rest http://t.co/isTW2bvA1m 20:14:45, 2014-05-03
• Decoding the latest Apple-Samsung dispute http://t.co/0K6DGL1G5u 08:30:48, 2014-05-04