What Is AI?

Artificial intelligence is technology in computers that seeks to replicate certain human intelligence, including learning, reasoning, and creative works. Computers can scan human works and learn to replicate such works, mimicking the writing or artistic style. The end result is that a computer can generate human expressive work without an actual human involved. This could include essays, paintings, and other works.

AI is capable of generating human writing, which has led to accusations of plagiarism and false accusations of plagiarism in academia and legal writing. Likewise, AI has led to controversy by replicating images, including paintings and drawings found in animated television shows and works of art.

Currently, the most concerning use of AI is in chat forums. People today can communicate through text messages on their phones or on websites. It is possible to communicate with others without having seen their actual faces. With AI though, it may simply be that people are communicating with a solely computerized system with no actual human actually writing the text messages online. 

In today’s lonely world, some people are turning to AI as their primary or even sole source of companionship. AI can be so sophisticated that it can feel like talking to an actual person, even though that “person” doesn’t exist. However, this has led to people forming intimate connections with AI, which can have real-world consequences even if the AI “person” isn’t real. This is especially true if the user was already married to begin with. 

Is It Possible to Cheat on Your Spouse with AI?

It might be questionable how one could cheat if there isn’t physical intimacy or even another person involved. However, a person could cheat on their spouse by being emotionally intimate with another “person” even if that person is only a machine. Some people will share their innermost thoughts, feelings, and secrets with AI that they may not even share with their spouse. The temptation would be even greater if one knows that the AI isn’t actually human – no one is actually listening, right?

However, the emotional intimacy may cause a person to become emotionally distant from their spouse. Eventually, that emotional distance could lead to physical separation followed by legal separation.

If it’s possible to cheat on your spouse with AI, then the legal consequences could be many:  

Child Custody

The most serious consequence is that a family court would call a parent’s judgment into question if the parent is having intimate discussions with AI. Child custody decisions are made based on the child’s best interests. That would include the ability of the parent to care for the child, and whichever home is better suited for the child’s needs. If a parent is spending so much time talking to a computer that he or she is neglecting their spouse, it would raise concerns among most people about whether that parent can actually focus on raising the child.

Adultery as a Crime

In some states, cheating on a spouse is a literal crime. In Michigan, Wisconsin, and Oklahoma, adultery is punishable as a felony. Adultery is also a misdemeanor in Alabama, Arizona, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Kansas, Maryland, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Rhode Island, South Carolina, and Virginia.

It seems laughable that the legal system would criminally punish someone with jail time and/or monetary fines for cheating on their spouse, let alone for chatting with an AI chatbot. However, some individuals have shared private information like bank accounts and social security numbers with this chatbot.

However, these laws are considered “legal fossils,” laws enacted years ago that most prosecutors today wouldn’t bring charges for. Still, the potential influx of adultery with AI might cause lawmakers and prosecutors to reexamine whether such laws are relevant or whether they should be enforced.

Alienation of Affection

Recently, TikTok content creator Brenay Kennard was ordered to pay $1.75 million for alleging destroying another woman’s marriage by cheating with the woman’s husband. The ex-wife sued under North Carolina’s alienation of affection laws, which permit recovery if a third party interfered with the marriage and caused it to end. However, only six states in the United States recognize alienation of affection as a legal claim: Hawaii, North Carolina, Mississippi, New Mexico, South Dakota, and Utah.

If AI chatbots can end marriages, spouses could argue that the companies that create and/or maintain the AI should be held legally responsible for destroying their marriages. AI companies are already being subject to lawsuits where teens commit suicide after an AI chatbot allegedly encourages them to do so. Lawsuits for interfering with a marriage would be a logical progression against AI companies.

Banning AI Marriages

Conversely, states are taking action to stop potential human-AI marriages. Ohio lawmakers have proposed the first bills that would affirm that AI bots are “nonsentient entities” that do not have personhood.

If all this sounds like something out of the Twilight Zone or Black Mirror, remember the 21st century is still young.

Do I Need a Lawyer for My Family Law Issue?

If you have difficulty seeing your child as the holidays approach, you should contact a family lawyer today. A skilled family lawyer can answer your questions, provide guidance on your case, and represent your best interests in court.

The post AI’s Impact on Divorce Law appeared first on Law Blog.

In certain states, it is possible to file a lawsuit for “alienation of affection.” In such claims, a plaintiff must demonstrate that a marriage existed and that a third party interfered with it and caused it to end. Only six states in the United States still recognize alienation of affection as a legal claim: Hawaii, North Carolina, Mississippi, New Mexico, South Dakota, and Utah.

Akira Montague filed a lawsuit against TikTok content creator Brenay Kennard, alleging that Kennard had an affair with Timothy Montague, her ex-husband, and caused her marriage to end. Kennard herself was married to Timothy’s cousin. Kennard has three million followers on TikTok and Instagram. Timothy appears in Kennard’s videos even while he was married to Akira.

Timothy, the ex-husband, testified against Akira at trial. Timothy stated he and Akira only married because of the latter’s housing situation, and that “we were just like roommates” and that “I loved her, but I wasn’t in love with her.” Brenay claims that Akira had given her consent for Brenay and Timothy to be together.

Akira presented evidence that Timothy had frequently shown signs of affection, including love notes and text messages. Akira’s mother testified that the two were “inseparable.” The couple officially separated in March 2024 and divorced in August. Akira filed a lawsuit for alienation of affection against Kennard in May 2024. In November 2025, a North Carolina jury awarded Akira $1.75 million against Kennard.

Alienation of Affection Is a Form of Interference with Contract

Although most states do not recognize alienation of affection, most states do recognize its business equivalent, interference with contract. To win on a claim of interference with contract, the party bringing the claim must prove:

• A valid contract with another person.
• This contract was known to a third party (the defendant).
• A third party interfered with the contractual relationship by intentional and wrongful means.
• That interference harmed the contractual relationship.

Interference with contracts claims are often brought when a star employee or player was under contract and then successfully “poached” by a competitor. However, most employment in the United States is “at-will” and thus subject to change at any time by either party for any non-illegal reason. Interference with contract claims only works if the employee was under a valid written contract.

It may be surprising then that the marriage version of interference with contract is not recognized in most states. After all, a marriage is understood in law as a form of contract and there may well be an actual written contract in the form of a prenuptial agreement. 

However, most business relationships are arranged solely for monetary purposes. The enticement to end a business relationship is more money. In contrast, a marriage is often for companionship, love, cementing a family, and other non-monetary goals. The “alienation” is not a one-way street. The spouse who is drifting out of the marriage may have non-monetary reasons for wanting out of the marriage. It may be that the marriage would have ended without the third party getting involved at all.

Quantifying the monetary value of a marriage is thus difficult since one cannot estimate how long the marriage would have lasted without outside interference.

Do I Need a Lawyer for My Family Law Issue?

If you have difficulty seeing your child as the holidays approach, you should contact a family lawyer today. A skilled family lawyer can answer your questions, provide guidance on your case, and represent your best interests in court.

The post North Carolina Social Media Influencer Ordered to Pay $1.75 million for Destroying Another Woman’s Marriage appeared first on Law Blog.

A “deepfake” is an edited image, video, or recording that has been altered. The deepfake may portray a person who was not actually present, wearing something that they were not wearing, or doing something they were not doing. “AI” stands for artificial intelligence, which can be used today to generate deepfake evidence.

Some deepfakes are made in jest and are very obvious, such as inserting SpongeBob into a prom dance. Other deepfakes may be for commercial purposes, such as with the Star Wars movie Rogue One, where a young-looking Carrie Fisher and Peter Cushing “reprised” their roles from the original movie. Deepfakes can also be used for propaganda purposes, sometimes to bolster politicians like Donald Trump and Gavin Newsom, and sometimes to undermine them.  

Most alarmingly, deepfakes can also be used to create false evidence for use in court. For instance, a deepfake video could be created to show a man hitting a woman even though that event never occurred. Deepfakes can also be used to create pornographic videos by putting the face of a person onto the body of a porn star. Celebrities, particularly women, have been victims of deepfake pornographic images. The technology has also been used as part of “revenge porn,” where people put the faces of their exes on nude bodies for blackmail or just malicious purposes.    

Conversely, technology can also cast doubt or even destroy trust in real evidence. Even if real evidence is presented to the court, the opposing party could object to the video or audio as a “deepfake.” Judges may exclude real evidence or give it little weight.

Expert Testimony to Prevent Deepfakes

Authenticating digital evidence often requires metadata, expert testimony, or forensic analysis. Text messages, videos, and other digital files leave behind digital footprints that an expert witness, such as a digital investigator, can examine. If this “digital footprint” doesn’t match the evidence, the expert can testify in open court about the discrepancy and present the offered deepfake evidence.

For instance, a video with metadata that establishes a creation date one day prior to the trial may not be real if the party offering the video as evidence claims it is a video of a fight taken a year prior. An expert would have to explain to the court what metadata is and how metadata shows the date of creation.

Authentication to Prevent Deepfakes

In many jurisdictions, digital files must be authenticated before they can be used as evidence at trial. A party introducing a digital file, such as a video, audio, or text, must demonstrate that it is what the party claims it is. At a minimum, the person who recorded the video or wrote the text must testify when and where they created the digital file. That person can be questioned under penalty of perjury to ensure that the evidence offered has not been edited or distorted in any way. Authentication may drag out the time for litigation, but it is necessary to ensure real evidence is admitted and false evidence excluded.

Do I Need a Lawyer for My Family Law Issue?

If you have difficulty seeing your child as the holidays approach, you should contact a family lawyer today. A skilled family lawyer can answer your questions, provide guidance on your case, and represent your best interests in court.

The post Deepfakes in Family Law appeared first on Law Blog.

Zwerner sued Ebony Parker, former assistant principal of the elementary school, as well as the district’s superintendent and school principal. The latter two were dismissed prior to the trial. Zwerner accused Parker of ignoring repeated warnings that the student had a gun. The lawsuit claims Parker had a duty to protect Zwerner and others after Parker was told about the gun. Parker allegedly failed to act in the hours before the shooting after several school staff members told Parker that the student had a gun in his backpack.

Zwerner and Parker went to trial, where the jury awarded $10million to the former teacher. Zwerner testified she first heard about the gun prior to class recess from another staff member who had been tipped off by students. Zwerner spent nearly two weeks in the hospital, required six surgeries and does not have the full use of her left hand. Parker faces a separate criminal trial on eight counts of felony child neglect.

The student’s mother was sentenced to nearly four years in prison for felony child neglect and federal weapons charges.

The six-year-old stated he got his mother’s handgun by climbing onto a drawer to reach the firearm in his mother’s purse.

When Is a Person Responsible for the Criminal Acts of Another?

A person is negligent if they acted carelessly given the situation. The law considers whether a reasonable person in the same situation would have acted in the same manner as that person. If not, that person may be considered negligent.

Negligence has four parts:

• Duty
• Breach
• Causation
• Damages

Most cases involving criminal acts of a third party are about whether the criminal act was foreseeable on the part of the defendant. A criminal act is foreseeable if the defendant knew or should have known that the third party would act in that way. Criminal acts may include theft by property managers, sexual abuse by teachers or coaches, the killing or assault of another person by a security guard, police officer, or in this instance, a young student.

A bad actor is foreseeable if the defendant had actual knowledge. In sexual abuse cases, actual knowledge will arise if the defendant is directly notified that the abuser is engaging in abuse. At that point, the school district or sports team must investigate or take further action to avoid potential negligence. Likewise, if school staff discovers that there is a gun on campus, they must investigate and potentially remove the gun from campus or face a potential negligence lawsuit.  

Do I Need the Help of a Personal Injury Attorney?

If you have sustained a personal injury through the unlawful act of another, then you should contact a personal injury attorney. A skilled personal injury lawyer near you can review the facts of your case, go over your rights and options, and represent you at hearings and in court.

The post Virginia Teacher Shot by Six-Year-Old Student Wins $10Million in Lawsuit Against School Administrator appeared first on Law Blog.

On October 17, 2025, an 8-by-12-foot balcony in the 200 block of Stetson Street near the University of Cincinnati collapsed. Ten people were taken to Cincinnati hospitals by the fire department.

University of Cincinnati medical student Andrew McGovern allegedly sustained disabling and permanent injuries when the Stetson Street balcony collapsed. McGovern and several others fell nearly 20 feet to the ground below.

McGovern is suing Stetson Square Condominium Unit Owners Association, Eclipse Community Management, property owners Hezekiel and Saba Eskender, as well as others allegedly responsible for the maintenance and repair of the balcony. The lawsuit alleges that one of the balcony’s main support beams failed, though investigations into the collapse are still ongoing. Fire personnel said it collapsed from the weight of too many people.

How are Property Owners Responsible for an Accident?

Premises liability law requires that property owners ensure the safety of any person who enters their property and take all reasonable measures to ensure their safety. There are exceptions, but generally, property owners are responsible for the safety of their guests and invitees.

To prove premises liability, the plaintiff, or person bringing the lawsuit, generally must prove the following:

• The owner owed a duty of care to the visitor or person injured on their property;
• There was a dangerous, unsafe, or defective condition on the owner’s property;
• The owner knew of the dangerous, unsafe, or dangerous condition but failed to remedy the situation; and
• That the injury occurred due to the owner’s failure to exercise their duty of care to prevent the accident and resulting injury.

A homeowner may not know if a support beam requires maintenance, though they may still be responsible for checking if such a search would be reasonable.

Who Is Responsible if Too Many People Had Been On the Balcony?

The homeowners may still be responsible for warning about capacity limit if the homeowners knew there was a risk with the number of persons who could be on the balcony. Likewise, the contractors or construction company may be responsible for warning the homeowners if they know that the balcony has a capacity limit. 

If no one knew or could have known that the balcony could collapse, then no one may be responsible. Although lawsuits are supposed to hold people responsible for an injury, sometimes life just happens randomly without explanation. Litigation may encourage people to act more responsively; there may well be some cases where no amount of caution can prevent an accident. However, an investigation propelled by a lawsuit may still be worth pursuing to ensure that every avenue of compensation is explored.

Do I Need the Help of a Personal Injury Attorney?

If you have sustained a personal injury through the unlawful act of another, then you should contact a personal injury attorney. A skilled personal injury lawyer near you can review the facts of your case, go over your rights and options, and represent you at hearings and in court.

The post Cincinnati Balcony Collapse Leads to Lawsuit appeared first on Law Blog.

The lawsuit claims Johnson and Johnson seemed to possibly ignore and “attempted to silence the science” around acetaminophen and autism. As attorney general, Paxton can sue under state consumer protection laws, the Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act, and the Deceptive Trade Practices Act.

Texas has repeatedly sued Johnson and Johnson over the last several years, including a $290 million settlement over the company’s role in the opioid epidemic in 2021.

Dozens have filed personal injury lawsuits against Johnson and Johnson, and its child company, Kenvue, alleging adverse neurodevelopment outcomes for their children after taking Tylenol while pregnant. Major medical associations rejected Kennedy’s claims as too generalized and potentially even harmful. Kenvue denied the allegations.

What Is Autism?

Autism, also known as autism spectrum disorder (ASD), is a neurodevelopmental disorder that manifests differences or difficulties in social communication and interaction, a strong preference for predictability and routine, sensory processing differences, focused interests, and repetitive behaviors. Autism is a spectrum disorder, which means that presentations vary and support needs range from almost non-existent to needing 24-hour care.

The exact causes of autism are unknown, though genetics is likely the largest contributing factor. There are certain people who have a desire to find a specific cause for autism. Notably, the original study that showed a link between vaccines and autism has since been retracted.

When are Companies Required to Give a Warning for Alleged Dangers to Their Products?

The Texas lawsuit alleges that Johnson and Johnson have a responsibility to warn about potential dangers of their products. Even if such risks are not always certain or not found in all studies, those potential risks should be given to consumers so that they can decide for themselves.

However, companies are not required to provide a warning in every instance. Companies only have to provide a warning if:

• The product is actually dangerous – No warning is necessary if the danger is non-existent. For instance, a motorcycle manufacturer does not have to warn users that their motorcycle may cause breast cancer if there is no risk of the motorcycle causing breast cancer.
• The danger is not open and obvious – No warning is necessary if the danger is obvious to all. For instance, a construction company may not have to put up warning signs for a large gaping hole overlooking a cliffside.
• The user is not sophisticated enough to understand the danger – People with technical experience may not require such warnings to know that a certain product is dangerous. A medical doctor may not need a warning to know that certain medication can be dangerous and an experienced motorcycle rider may not need a warning to know that riding without a helmet is a potential safety hazard.

For Johnson and Johnson, the defense here will likely be that Tylenol does not actually pose a risk of autism. Until Kennedy spoke up last month, hardly anyone believed or knew there could be a link between Tylenol. Texas, and anyone else bringing these lawsuits, would have to prove that Tylenol could actually cause autism. This may be an uphill battle since studies have shown there are quite a few alternative causes, including the genetics of the parents and/or the age of the parents.

If you have any concerns about using Tylenol, you should consult with a doctor first. Unlike Texas or politicians, a doctor will have a fiduciary duty to provide you with the best medical information concerning your health or your child’s health.

Do I Need the Help of a Personal Injury Attorney?

If you have sustained a personal injury through the unlawful act of another, then you should contact a personal injury attorney. A skilled personal injury lawyer near you can review the facts of your case, go over your rights and options, and represent you at hearings and in court.

The post Tylenol Company Sued by Texas Over Autism Claims appeared first on Law Blog.

Mun was carrying her daughter in Target’s parking lot. She was navigating between parked cars and puddles when she tripped and fell on an uneven surface. The uneven surface was allegedly a violation of several building codes. Mun twisted her ankle and fractured her right leg, leading to a handful of procedures. Mun landed in a “pretzel position” in an effort to catch her balance to avoid dropping her child.

Mun sued Target and Site Centers Corp, the owner of the shopping center, for their alleged negligence and failure to properly maintain the parking lot. Mun’s attorneys stated she turned down a pre-trial settlement offer of $250,000 prior to the verdict from the Orange County jury. Following the trial, the jury found Target was 90% at fault and awarded her $11.4 million.

Considering All Aspects of Tort Reform

These verdicts often bring out campaigns for “tort reform.” Tort reform refers to proposals in the civil legal system that attempt to reduce the ability of plaintiffs to bring lawsuits and/or to reduce the amount of money that can be recovered from a lawsuit.

Tort reforms are periodically raised every few decades in the United States following “nuclear” jury verdicts – verdicts that are extraordinarily high, exceeding what most experts would believe a jury would award. The most infamous lawsuit that led to a push for tort reform was the hot coffee case in the 1990s. Proposed reforms have included eliminating interest, limiting punitive damages and/or non-economic damages, limiting venues, and other potential changes.

It is odd, though, that the push is rarely to expand the opportunities or rights of plaintiffs who are injured in accidents. There are many factors that would justify awarding more “nuclear” verdicts. First, inflation in medical bills would require greater verdicts to pay for such bills. If Mun had multiple surgeries and/or an extended hospital stay, her medical expenses could be significant. Likewise, salaries, childcare, and other expenses have gone up. If Mun had significant lost wages or loss of ability to care for her daughter due to her injuries, those expenses would contribute to the verdict.

The threat of nuclear verdicts would also compel companies to actually make changes to ensure safety. A greater number of nuclear verdicts would encourage companies to actually care about how they conduct themselves, rather than write a check or look to their insurance company to pay out. The cost of regular maintenance is often less than the cost of medical treatment.   

Although there are cases where a plaintiff may exaggerate or even fabricate their injuries, defense lawyers are capable of determining whether a plaintiff is being less than honest about their damages. Nor should dishonest plaintiffs relieve a company’s responsibility to ensure the safety of others.  

Do I Need the Help of a Personal Injury Attorney?

If you have sustained a personal injury through the unlawful act of another, then you should contact a personal injury attorney. A skilled personal injury lawyer near you can review the facts of your case, go over your rights and options, and represent you at hearings and in court.

The post Florida Woman Awarded Nearly $11 Million in Lawsuit Against Target After Parking Lot Trip and Fall appeared first on Law Blog.

According to the criminal complaint, prosecutors claim Martinez was driving as part of a “convoy” that was following agents for about 30 minutes, disobeying traffic signals, and driving “aggressively” to chase the federal vehicles. As she drove, Martinez was broadcasting on Facebook Live. She was allegedly sounding her horn and following the vehicles.

Martinez’s lawyers claim body camera video shows an agent turning his vehicle into Martinez’s vehicle. After the impact, the agent in the video yells aggressively while using profanity at Martinez. The agent then leaves his vehicle and fires several rounds at Martinez. The Department of Justice has not denied that Martinez was shot several times by the officer. 

After the shooting, Martinez drove herself to a nearby shop. The manager called 911 while Martinez was bleeding on the chair. She was taken to the hospital by ambulance. She was bleeding so profusely that agents were forced to wait to take her into custody while doctors treated her.

U.S. District Judge Heather McShain denied a request by the federal government to detain Martinez and Anthony Ian Santos Ruiz, 21, pending trial. The judge cited Martinez’s lack of criminal history and extensive family and community ties as compelling reasons to release her pending trial.

Is It Illegal to Follow a Police Car?

There are two situations where “following” a police car might be an issue. First, if one is simply drivingon the same street and/or in the same direction as the police car. There is no intent to follow the police car, just a coincidence. This is absolutely legal, and not even a “gray area.”

The second situation is one where Ms. Martinez was involved. Ms. Martinez and several others were following border patrol agents with the intent to record them and warn others about their location. Most jurisdictions do not have laws against following a police officer, and many jurisdictions, under the First Amendment, will protect the right to record an officer.

Warning other people that law enforcement agents are approaching is a “gray area.” Some jurisdictions have determined that warning others may be constitutionally protected speech. However, a prosecutor may interpret that warning as obstruction of justice since that warning could be used to conceal information or evid

ence of lawbreaking.

For law enforcement, an unknown vehicle following them, while not illegal, could be threatening. Nobody wants to be followed or stalked, as there could be an imminent threat to their safety. Law enforcement officers are usually armed, but they can still be the targets of gangs and other criminals. However, the public arguably have a right to monitor law enforcement since law enforcement is supposed to work for the public. Although following a police car is not illegal, it is potentially a bad idea since it may cause law enforcement officers to become suspicious of why they are being followed.

What Happens If the Allegations are Contradicted by the Evidence?

The exact charge against Martinez and one other was for:

“forcibly assaulted, resisted, opposed, impeded, intimidated, and interfered with a person designated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 1114, namely an officer and employee of the United States, while he was engaged in the performance of his official duties, and in the commission of such acts used a deadly and dangerous weapon.”

The “deadly and dangerous weapon” in this charge was presumably Martinez’s vehicle. Although Martinez had a gun with her during the incident, it is not disputed that she remained in her vehicle the whole time, the gun was allegedly still in her purse, and Martinez has a concealed weapons permit.

The officer’s shooting was allegedly self-defense on the part of the officers. Martinez’s attorneys claim there is body cam footage showing the opposite: the officer rammed her vehicle and then proceeded to shoot her while she was still inside her vehicle. If it were solely Martinez’s word against the officers, a jury would determine who is credible.

The optics of the situation are very poor for the federal government to claim self-defense on the part of the officer. First, Martinez is an unarmed woman against a male officer brandishing a firearm. Second, Martinez was the one who was severely injured; there is no allegation that the officer sustained any injuries.

However, the body cam footage would likely change the weight of the evidence. It would no longer be Martinez versus the officer’s word, but there would be substantial evidence supporting one side or another.

Moreover, other factors would likely weaken the charges against Martinez. As stated earlier, it is not illegal in and of itself to follow or record law enforcement. Even warning others of law enforcement coming may be considered protected speech. If Martinez’s lawyers are correct and Martinez was still in her vehicle, then there is even less reason for the officer to shoot her.

Do I Need a Criminal Defense Lawyer?

A criminal defense attorney can help you build your case and represent you during all the phases of a murder or manslaughter trial. The emotional benefits include some sense of relief that your attorney is on your side.

The post Chicago Woman Indicted Despite Claims She Was Shot by a Federal Agent appeared first on Law Blog.

An unidentified woman in her 60s passed away while riding Disneyland’s Haunted Mansion ride. The woman was unresponsive when her car got to the end of the ride. Disneyland security performed CPR until paramedics arrived. She was transported to Orange County Hospital, where she was pronounced dead. Investigation is still underway, though the cause of death may be a heart attack unrelated to the operation of the ride itself.

Did the Haunted Mansion Contribute to the Woman’s Death?

It will be difficult to establish a connection between the woman’s death and the ride she was on. The primary questions for Disney from an operational standpoint would be whether the cast members checked that she was secured when she got in the vehicle. Due to the sheer volume of guests and the lack of lighting in the ride, it would be difficult for any Disney cast member to check whether she was healthy enough to ride. However, unlike rides like Space Mountain or Splash Mountain, the Haunted Mansion is not a particularly risky one.

The Haunted Mansion is a slow-moving ride, which transports guests in two-person vehicles that move about one mile per hour. The ride is not a roller-coaster; there are no drops, sudden stops, or any other feature that would induce a heart attack. Young children and great-grandmothers could safely ride it. Since the ride moves so slowly and takes place in an air-conditioned building in the dark, guests could easily fall asleep on the ride (I have personally taken a nap from time to time while riding the Haunted Mansion).

The only element of the ride that could contribute to the woman’s death is that it uses visual projections to show “ghosts” throughout the mansion to scare guests.

Even if the “thrills” of the Haunted Mansion contributed to the woman’s death, it is arguable that she assumed the risks when she entered the ride. The name “Haunted Mansion” and the exterior and interior of the ride, which is a haunted mansion, all indicate that the ride is intended to resemble a haunted house. If the woman experienced a moment of surprise or mild discomfort, it could be considered part of the intended thrill of the ride. Just like watching a horror movie and feeling a little scared, it’s all part of the entertainment. Nevertheless, this is not the intended outcome for a guest, and it is incredibly unfortunate.

Do I Need the Help of a Personal Injury Attorney?

If you have sustained a personal injury through the unlawful act of another, then you should contact a personal injury attorney. A skilled personal injury lawyer near you can review the facts of your case, go over your rights and options, and represent you at hearings and in court.

The post Woman Passes Away After Riding Disneyland Haunted Mansion appeared first on Law Blog.

In October 2025, Florida passed a law known as “Trooper’s Law.” Under the new law, anyone who restrains and abandons an animal in a natural disaster in Florida could be charged with a third-degree felony.

What Is Animal Neglect?

Animal neglect occurs when the owner or caretaker of a pet or other animal neglects that animal. This may occur when the individual does not provide the basic necessities for the animal’s survival. Basic necessities are defined in most states as:

• Food and water
• Space to move and play
• General clean condition; and
• Protection from severe weather.

Most states also make it illegal to leave an animal in public or to leave an animal without providing for its basic needs. It is illegal in some states to leave an animal unattended in a vehicle because of the potential for heat stroke.

Is Animal Neglect Punishable Under the Law?

In some states, animal neglect is considered a “wobbler,” which means an individual may face either a misdemeanor charge or a felony charge, depending on the facts of the case and the prosecutor’s discretion.

Additional consequences of animal neglect may include:

• Having the animal permanently removed from the owner;
• Paying fines and costs for removal of the animal; or
• Additional penalties if the neglect involved the use of dangerous or deadly weapons.

Views of Animals Have Shifted from Property to Family Members

Most states still consider pets personal property. During a divorce, many states will give custody to the spouse who purchased the pet prior to the marriage or who was the pet’s primary caregiver. Likewise, a companion pet or service animal is more relevant in states where pets are considered property, as companion or service animals serve the interests of the pet owner rather than the pet itself.

However, there is a growing sense that pets are family and should be afforded the same consideration by courts. Laws forbidding animals from being left in vehicles due to heat stroke are reminiscent of rules about leaving children unattended in vehicles. Trooper’s law continues the trend that animals are not property but worthy of rights as living things.  

Do I Need a Criminal Defense Lawyer?

A criminal defense attorney can help you build your case and represent you during all the phases of a murder or manslaughter trial. The emotional benefits include some sense of relief that your attorney is on your side.

The post Florida Law in Reaction to Abandonment of Dog During Hurricane Reflects Greater Compassion for Pets as Family Members appeared first on Law Blog.

Pennsylvania’s House of Representatives has recently rejected a bill amendment that would create a presumption that 50/50 custody is in the best interest of the child as long as both pa

rents are fit to provide care. Moreover, the bill would have eliminated the 13 child custody factors that family court judges are to weigh and instead replace them with the following three factors:

1. considerations of past abuse by a parent;
2. level of conflict between the parents, and
3. willingness and ability to cooperate.

This bill amendment was proposed by state Rep. Jamie Flick. Rep. Flick ran for public office after he was only awarded child custody every other weekend following a family court hearing that was allegedly only a few minutes long. Similar bills have passed in Kentucky, South Dakota, Florida, and Missouri.

Pennsylvania Factors for Child Custody

The proposed amendment may be a solution in search of a problem. The primary reason to have 50/50 custody is to ensure fairness for the parents. Unfortunately, many family courts still assume that mothers should be the primary caretakers. This historical assumption has both hindered women in the workplace and men in child-rearing.

However, current Pennsylvania law requires that the court keep its decision gender neutral – no party shall receive preference based upon gender. This benefit of 50/50 custody has already been directly addressed by the state’s requirement that custody decisions be made regardless of the gender of the parents.

The other argument for 50/50 custody is that it should be presumed to be in the child’s best interests to have equal time with both parents. However, there may be instances where one parent is better for the child. This does not mean that the other parent did anything wrong, but a particular child’s needs may be better suited by spending more time with one parent.

For instance, a pre-teen who enjoys softball may want to spend more time with her father because her father is a coach in the local baseball league. Conversely, a child may be better off spending more time with the mother because she lives closer to the school, whereas the father is always traveling.

Such decisions should be made on a case-by-case basis based on what the child needs, or wants if they are mature enough, rather than a strict 50/50 rule. This isn’t to say that the decision

 should be completely arbitrary. Pennsylvania has 13 current factors for family law judges to consider when making custody decisions. These 13 factors already include Rep. Flick’s proposed 3 factors and many more:

1. Which party is more likely to ensure the safety of the child.
2. The present and past abuse committed by a party or member of the party’s household, which may include past or current protection from abuse or sexual violence protection orders where there has been a finding of abuse.
3. Violent or assaultive behavior committed by a party.
4. The level of cooperation and conflict between the parties.
5. A willingness and ability of a party to prioritize the needs of the child by providing appropriate care, stability and continuity for the child, considering the parental duties performed by the party on behalf of the child in the past and whether the party is willing and able to perform the duties in the future, and attend to the daily physical, emotional, developmental, educational and special needs of the child.
6. The need for stability and continuity in the child’s education, family life, and community life, except if changes are necessary to protect the safety of the child or a party.
7. The child’s sibling and other familial relationships.
8. The well-reasoned preference of the child, based on the child’s developmental stage, maturity, and judgment.
9. The proximity of the residences of the parties.
10. Each party’s employment schedule and availability to care for the child or ability to make appropriate child-care arrangements.
11. The history of drug or alcohol abuse of a party or member of a party’s household.
12. The mental and physical condition of a party or member of a party’s household.
13. Any other relevant factor.

Many of these factors overlap with one another. Concerns regarding safety, abuse, violent behavior, and drugs and alcohol could all fit into “considerations of past abuse by a parent” if that category remains vague.

However, there are other factors that should be considered that Flick’s proposed factors simply don’t take into account. The preference of the child and stability of the household don’tneatly fit into abuse, conflict, or cooperation, but they are still factors that a family law judge could fairly take into consideration.

Do I Need a Lawyer for My Family Law Issue?

If you have difficulty seeing your child as the holidays approach, you should contact a family lawyer today. A skilled family lawyer can answer your questions, provide guidance on your case, and represent your best interests in court.

The post Pennsylvania House of Representatives Rejects Update to Child Custody Laws appeared first on Law Blog.

Dr. Grewal also mentions during the video that “I have a secret that I use sometimes. It says, ‘Make your smile great again, I wear that when I work on my patients so when they look horrified or complain, I quietly cut back on the laughing gas and say, ‘You got this. It’s not as bad as you think it is.’”

Dr. Grewal has promoted herself as the “MAGA Dentist,” not just on her personal social media but also for her business, Skyline Smiles.

Denial of a Service Does Not Constitute Free Speech

Professionals have a right to free speech as everyone else does. However, actions in violation of a fiduciary duty would not constitute free speech. A professional is free to express any political preference she wants in her personal and professional capacity. A professional can decorate their office however they want. However, a professional cannot knowingly harm or deny service to any of their patients regardless of their political differences. That would constitute an action by a professional, not a form of free speech.  

Professionals Owe Fiduciary Duty to All Their Patients

Political discrimination is not prohibited under the federal Civil Rights Act. California does have laws against political discrimination, though such laws are not always enforced. However, every state has laws that impose a fiduciary duty on dentists and other medical professionals. 

A fiduciary duty is the highest standard of duty that can be imposed by the law. A fiduciary is required to act solely in the best interest of another party. A lawyer is required to act in the best interests of their clients. Medical professionals are required to act in their patients’ best interests.

The fiduciary duty is owed to each individual client/patient. It would be a violation of a fiduciary duty if a professional either directly harmed a client or patient or knowingly failed to help them. Failure to provide a service based on the patient’s politics would be a violation of this fiduciary duty. A professional who violates a fiduciary duty is potentially subject to a medical malpractice lawsuit and/or suspension of a professional license.

Do I Need the Help of a Personal Injury Attorney?

If you have sustained a personal injury through the unlawful act of another, then you should contact a personal injury attorney. A skilled personal injury lawyer near you can review the facts of your case, go over your rights and options, and represent you at hearings and in court.

The post Medical Professionals Who Treat Patients Differently Based on Politics Could Be a Breach of Fiduciary Duties appeared first on Law Blog.

In September 2025, though, the President, Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., and other federal officials advised women not to take acetaminophen while pregnant or to give it to their babies. The Food and Drug Administration has begun changing the label for acetaminophen to say that it may be associated with an increased risk of autism and ADHD when used during pregnancy. “If you’re pregnant, don’t take Tylenol; when you have your baby, don’t give your baby Tylenol at all unless it’s absolutely necessary.”

The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists has stated that Tylenol is appropriate for use in pregnancy when necessary, and the organization isn’t changing its guidance at the moment.

Politicization of Medicine Could Impact Either Side of a Lawsuit

Some parents may be encouraged to bring further lawsuits against Kenvue, which could impact the market for Tylenol. While acknowledging that medical expertise resides with healthcare professionals, the President and Health Secretary have expressed their concerns regarding acetaminophen. If the public, or certain segments of the public, associate such lawsuits with a government they view as unreliable or unpopular, that could potentially persuade a jury to vote against such lawsuits. Conversely, areas of the country more supportive of this President could possibly be influenced to support such plaintiffs.

It Is Not Unusual for Experts to Be Paid

The Administration allegedly based its position on testimony from Harvard School of Public Health Dean Andrea A. Barracelli in a lawsuit from 2023. Barracelli served as an expert witness for parents and guardians of children suing Johnson & Johnson, which manufactured Tylenol at the time. U.S. District Court Judge Denise L. Cote, who was overseeing the case, threw out Barracelli’s testimony and then dismissed the case in 2024. Judge Cote wrote that Barracelli “cherry-picked and misrepresented study results and refused to acknowledge the role of genetics in the etiology.” Notably, most experts believe there is only a correlation between Tylenol and autism. Even Barracelli acknowledged there was only a “possibility of a causal relationship” between acetaminophen and autism.

Since the Administration cited Barracelli’s work, there has been discussion of the fact that the plaintiffs paid Barracelli $700 an hour for his expert testimony, for a total of $150,000. It is a common practice for parties in a lawsuit to retain and compensate expert witnesses for their specialized knowledge. The amount paid to Barracelli is not unusual in this context. Lawyers don’t have the knowledge to discuss advanced medical research or any other nuanced technical areas, and are permitted to hire experts to help them. Experts often spend long hours preparing their presentation to the jury and deserve to be compensated for their work.

Do I Need the Help of a Personal Injury Attorney?

If you have sustained a personal injury through the unlawful act of another, then you should contact a personal injury attorney. A skilled personal injury lawyer near you can review the facts of your case, go over your rights and options, and represent you at hearings and in court.

The post Tylenol Lawsuits: Expert Testimony, Political Influence, and the Search for Causation appeared first on Law Blog.

What Is Arbitration?

Arbitration is a legal process where both sides have their legal disputes heard by a neutral third person or persons. The neutral third persons are essentially private judges and are known as arbitrators. Arbitrators hear the evidence and arguments and make a binding decision on all parties.

Arbitration is often preferred over regular lawsuits because arbitration is typically final. Federal law makes arbitration binding and typically non-appealable. Since the decision is supposed to be binding and final, parties, in theory, save time and money rather than go through a seemingly endless appeal process.

Many parties select arbitrators based upon expertise in a given field. For instance, if Microsoft and Apple have a copyright dispute, they can hire an arbitrator who knows more about copyright law in electronics than an average civil court judge.

Why Wouldn’t Parties Want to Use Religious Arbitration?

Religious arbitration may not be suitable when a party is concerned with the neutrality of the arbitration or is concerned about the conflicts that religious arbitration may have with secular law. A party who has left or no longer wishes to participate in a religious faith may find religious arbitration unsuitable. A party that is trying to leave a religion, such as Scientology, Catholicism, or Islam, may not want the “neutral” arbitrator to be enforcing the tenants of that faith.

Likewise, a party may have concerns about certain religion’s values when it conflicts with those protected by secular law. Gender equality, LGBTQ rights, and abortion may be deemphasized or ignored by certain faiths.

Why Would Parties Agree to a Religious Arbitration?

Just as two businesses may want a subject matter expert to settle their dispute, two persons in a religious setting may prefer someone with a deeper grasp of their religious dispute. For instance, if a pastor has an employment disagreement with his church, both the pastor and the church may prefer an arbitrator familiar with their domination rather than an official judge who may not be familiar with the details of their faith.  Similarly, couples who have been married within the faith may prefer an arbitrator who understands the laws of their religion rather than have a lay person adjudicate their marriage. They may also prefer an arbitrator who can act as a spiritual advisor rather than a secular judge who may be more concerned with enforcing certain laws or policies.

For instance, there was a child custody case where a Native American community wanted the child to remain within the community because the community’s population had become so small that its survival was in jeopardy. However, one of the parents wanted to take the child to live in a large city with greater resources and access to other people not affiliated with the Native American community. A secular American court should protect the child’s best interests as an individual right. However, the Native American community might have preferred arbitration in this instance to preserve community relations and harmony.

Religious minorities such as the Amish, certain Jewish, Islamic, Christian denominations, and other religious minorities might want to choose arbitration, which prioritizes the tenets and interests of the faith more than secular law would.   

Religious arbitration exists because secular governments permit them to. In the United States, religious arbitration is permissible provided that the arbitration is voluntary on the part of all parties – no one is coerced into participating if they would prefer regular litigation over arbitration.

Moreover, governments in the United States cannot discriminate or favor certain religions over others. If a state wants to permit religious arbitration for Catholics or Mormons, religious arbitration must be an option for all other religions as well. This would include Islam and “Sharia law.” If religious arbitration is permitted for one faith but not others, that would violate both the establishment clause and the free exercise clauses of the First Amendment.

 Do I Need a Lawyer for My Family Law Issue?

If you have difficulty seeing your child as the holidays approach, you should contact a family lawyer today. A skilled family lawyer can answer your questions, provide guidance on your case, and represent your best interests in court.

The post Religious Arbitration in Family Law appeared first on Law Blog.

Zeidman himself had supported Donald Trump in the 2020 elections, but wanted to see the proof that the election had been tampered with his own eyes. Prior to entering the contest, Zeidman believed that Lindell would have vetted the data beforehand. Instead, Zeidman proved that the data Lindell had produced was not election data at all. Zeidman asked for his reward, which Lindell refused to pay.

In April 2023, an arbitration panel had ordered Lindell to pay the $5 million as promised to Zeidman. The arbitration panel was made up of three arbitrators, one hired by Lindell, the second hired by Zeidman, and a neutral arbitrator agreed upon by both men. The arbitration found 3-0 in favor of Zeidman.

Still, Lindell did not pay. Instead, Lindell filed an appeal to the federal court in October 2023. Judge John Tunheim heard the arguments and then, in February 2024, ruled in Zeidman’s favor. Judge Tunheim questioned whether he would have ruled the same way as the arbitrators, but given the binding nature of arbitration, Judge Tunheim determined he could not overrule the arbitrators.

Undeterred, Lindell appealed the decision to the 8th Circuit Court of Appeals. In July 2025, the 8th Circuit issued a ruling overturning the lower court and arbitration decision. The 8th Circuit believed that Zeidman was required to prove that the information was not related to the 2020 election. Lindell’s lawyers claimed, and the 8th Circuit believed, that Zeidman had only proved that the electronic data was present on the internet rather than proving that the data was not related to the election. Zeidman now appeals the ruling to the United States Supreme Court.

What Is Arbitration?

Arbitration is a legal process where both sides have their legal disputes heard by a neutral third person (or persons). Arbitrators hear the evidence and arguments and make a binding decision on all parties. Effectively, arbitrators are private judges.

Arbitration is binding and typically non-appealable because of the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA). Under the FAA, Congress has made arbitration binding outside of certain exceptions, such as fraud or prejudicial misconduct by the arbitrators. However, such exceptions are rarely upheld as the FAA requires that arbitration be binding and non-appealable by the parties involved.

Arbitration is often preferred over regular lawsuits because arbitration is typically final – there is no right to appeal an arbitration. Since the decision is supposed to be binding and final, parties, in theory, save time and money rather than go through a seemingly endless appeal process.

Many parties select arbitrators based on expertise in a given field. For instance, if Tesla and Toyota have a dispute over a car manufacturing deal, they can hire an arbitrator who knows more about automobiles than an average civil court judge.

The Supreme Court Should Uphold the Arbitration Award

Congress has long since made the determination that arbitration is preferable to litigation if the parties agree to arbitration beforehand. The 8th Circuit may have disagreed with the arbitrators about the merits of the case, but under the FAA, the 8th Circuit should have deferred to the arbitrators as the trial court did.

If voters like Lindell don’t want arbitration to be mandatory, they should ask Congress to repeal the FAA rather than appeal to the courts. The Supreme Court has been consistent on this stance for decades, especially since the FAA is an act of Congress and not just a Supreme Court interpretation.

Do I Need a Lawyer for My Contract Issues?

If you have any issues or simply wish for a lawyer to review a contract before you sign it, it may be helpful to contact a contract lawyer. Your lawyer can help with drafting, reviewing, or filing a lawsuit to enforce the contract and can represent you in court.

The post Examining Arbitration and the Appeal Process Through the ‘Prove Mike Wrong’ Lawsuit appeared first on Law Blog.