JurisDiction http://iplawpodcast.com The International Intellectual Property Law Podcast Sat, 02 Mar 2013 04:59:25 +0000 en hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 JurisDiction,Law,Intellectual,Property,Toronto,IP,Legal,IP,patent,trademark,copyright,iplawpodcast,com,trade,mark,trade,mark,intellectual,propertyBusiness/Business Newsdon@cameronmackendrick.comBereskin & Parr LLPBereskin & Parr LLPnoJurisDiction,Law,Intellectual,Property,Toronto,IP,Legal,IP,patent,trademark,copyright,iplawpodcast,com,trade,mark,trade,mark,intellectual,propertyThe International Intellectual Property Law PodcastJurisDiction is the international intellectual property law podcast featuring interviews of the top-rated IP law practitioners from around the world talking about patent, trademark and copyright law issues. Hosted by Don Cameron of Bereskin & Parr LLP in Toronto, Canada. Available at iplawpodcast.com. January 2013 – Episode 27 http://iplawpodcast.com/2013/03/02/january-2013-episode-27/ http://iplawpodcast.com/2013/03/02/january-2013-episode-27/#comments Sat, 02 Mar 2013 04:59:25 +0000 don@cameronmackendrick.com (Bereskin & Parr LLP) http://iplawpodcast.com/?p=130 Continue reading →]]> Belinda Scrimenti of Pattishall, McAuliffe, Newbury, Hilliard & Geraldson LLP in Chicago discusses her papers entitled “100 Years of Seeing RED – A Historical Perspective on the Second Circuit’s “Red-Sole Shoe” Mark Decision in Louboutin v. Yves Saint Laurent” and “A Legal Kaleidoscope – Single Color Trademarks, From pre-Owens-Corning Pink Insulation to Louboutin Red-Soled Shoes” (Length: 30:19)

Download MP3

]]> http://iplawpodcast.com/2013/03/02/january-2013-episode-27/feed/ 0 noBelinda Scrimenti of Pattishall, McAuliffe, Newbury, Hilliard & Geraldson LLP in Chicago discusses her papers entitled “100 Years of Seeing RED – A Historical Perspective on the Second Circuit’s “Red-Sole Shoe” Mark Decision iBereskin & Parr LLPBelinda Scrimenti of Pattishall, McAuliffe, Newbury, Hilliard & Geraldson LLP in Chicago discusses her papers entitled “100 Years of Seeing RED – A Historical Perspective on the Second Circuit’s “Red-Sole Shoe” Mark Decision in Louboutin v. Yves Saint Laurent” and … Continue reading →JurisDiction,Law,Intellectual,Property,Toronto,IP,Legal,IP,patent,trademark,copyright,iplawpodcast,com,trade,mark,trade,mark,intellectual,property November 2012 – Episode 26 http://iplawpodcast.com/2013/01/25/november-2012-episode-26/ http://iplawpodcast.com/2013/01/25/november-2012-episode-26/#comments Fri, 25 Jan 2013 03:54:09 +0000 don@cameronmackendrick.com (Bereskin & Parr LLP) http://iplawpodcast.com/?p=127 Donald M. Cameron of Bereskin & Parr LLP in Toronto Canada explains the Canadian Supreme Court decision in Teva v. Pfizer on the VIAGRA use patent. (Length: 12:39)

Download MP3

]]> http://iplawpodcast.com/2013/01/25/november-2012-episode-26/feed/ 0 noDonald M. Cameron of Bereskin & Parr LLP in Toronto Canada explains the Canadian Supreme Court decision in Teva v. Pfizer on the VIAGRA use patent. (Length: 12:39) Download MP3Bereskin & Parr LLPDonald M. Cameron of Bereskin & Parr LLP in Toronto Canada explains the Canadian Supreme Court decision in Teva v. Pfizer on the VIAGRA use patent. (Length: 12:39) Download MP3JurisDiction,Law,Intellectual,Property,Toronto,IP,Legal,IP,patent,trademark,copyright,iplawpodcast,com,trade,mark,trade,mark,intellectual,property July 2012 – Episode 25 http://iplawpodcast.com/2012/08/10/july-2012-episode-25/ http://iplawpodcast.com/2012/08/10/july-2012-episode-25/#comments Fri, 10 Aug 2012 04:23:17 +0000 don@cameronmackendrick.com (Bereskin & Parr LLP) http://iplawpodcast.com/?p=115 Karen Canady of canady + lortz LLP in Los Angeles provides a patent attorney’s view of the basics of genes and the hotly-contested litigation over biotechnology patents. (Length: 11:12)

Download MP3

]]> http://iplawpodcast.com/2012/08/10/july-2012-episode-25/feed/ 0 noKaren Canady of canady + lortz LLP in Los Angeles provides a patent attorney’s view of the basics of genes and the hotly-contested litigation over biotechnology patents. (Length: 11:12) Download MP3Bereskin & Parr LLPKaren Canady of canady + lortz LLP in Los Angeles provides a patent attorney’s view of the basics of genes and the hotly-contested litigation over biotechnology patents. (Length: 11:12) Download MP3JurisDiction,Law,Intellectual,Property,Toronto,IP,Legal,IP,patent,trademark,copyright,iplawpodcast,com,trade,mark,trade,mark,intellectual,property June 2012 – Episode 24 http://iplawpodcast.com/2012/06/30/june-2012-episode-24/ http://iplawpodcast.com/2012/06/30/june-2012-episode-24/#comments Sat, 30 Jun 2012 05:17:03 +0000 don@cameronmackendrick.com (Bereskin & Parr LLP) http://iplawpodcast.com/?p=111 Trevor Cook of Bird & Bird, London England discusses “English Patent Litigation – Under New Management” (Length: 17:53)

Download MP3

]]> http://iplawpodcast.com/2012/06/30/june-2012-episode-24/feed/ 0 noTrevor Cook of Bird & Bird, London England discusses “English Patent Litigation – Under New Management” (Length: 17:53) Download MP3Bereskin & Parr LLPTrevor Cook of Bird & Bird, London England discusses “English Patent Litigation – Under New Management” (Length: 17:53) Download MP3JurisDiction,Law,Intellectual,Property,Toronto,IP,Legal,IP,patent,trademark,copyright,iplawpodcast,com,trade,mark,trade,mark,intellectual,property May 2012 – Episode 23 http://iplawpodcast.com/2012/06/10/may-2012-episode-23/ http://iplawpodcast.com/2012/06/10/may-2012-episode-23/#comments Sun, 10 Jun 2012 03:40:28 +0000 don@cameronmackendrick.com (Bereskin & Parr LLP) http://iplawpodcast.com/?p=106 James Gould, of Locke Lord LLP, New York City discusses “Comics and Copyright and a Super Legal Battle” (Length: 15:20)

Download MP3

]]> http://iplawpodcast.com/2012/06/10/may-2012-episode-23/feed/ 0 noJames Gould, of Locke Lord LLP, New York City discusses “Comics and Copyright and a Super Legal Battle” (Length: 15:20) Download MP3Bereskin & Parr LLPJames Gould, of Locke Lord LLP, New York City discusses “Comics and Copyright and a Super Legal Battle” (Length: 15:20) Download MP3JurisDiction,Law,Intellectual,Property,Toronto,IP,Legal,IP,patent,trademark,copyright,iplawpodcast,com,trade,mark,trade,mark,intellectual,property April 2012 – Episode 22 http://iplawpodcast.com/2012/06/08/april-2012-episode-22/ http://iplawpodcast.com/2012/06/08/april-2012-episode-22/#comments Fri, 08 Jun 2012 04:10:34 +0000 don@cameronmackendrick.com (Bereskin & Parr LLP) http://iplawpodcast.com/?p=101 Cynthia Lopez Beverage of ST Ericsson in Santa Clara California discusses “Surviving in a Secondary Patent Marketplace”. (Length: 22:23)

Download MP3

]]> http://iplawpodcast.com/2012/06/08/april-2012-episode-22/feed/ 0 noCynthia Lopez Beverage of ST Ericsson in Santa Clara California discusses “Surviving in a Secondary Patent Marketplace”. (Length: 22:23) Download MP3Bereskin & Parr LLPCynthia Lopez Beverage of ST Ericsson in Santa Clara California discusses “Surviving in a Secondary Patent Marketplace”. (Length: 22:23) Download MP3JurisDiction,Law,Intellectual,Property,Toronto,IP,Legal,IP,patent,trademark,copyright,iplawpodcast,com,trade,mark,trade,mark,intellectual,property March 2012 – Episode 21 http://iplawpodcast.com/2012/04/27/march-2012-episode-21/ http://iplawpodcast.com/2012/04/27/march-2012-episode-21/#comments Fri, 27 Apr 2012 04:25:18 +0000 don@cameronmackendrick.com (Bereskin & Parr LLP) http://iplawpodcast.jurisdiction.com/?p=79 Robert Fischer of Fitzpatrick Cella Harper & Scinto in New York City discusses the history and recent cases involving patentable subject matter in the computer and business methods areas. (Length: 26:11)

Download MP3

]]> http://iplawpodcast.com/2012/04/27/march-2012-episode-21/feed/ 0 noRobert Fischer of Fitzpatrick Cella Harper & Scinto in New York City discusses the history and recent cases involving patentable subject matter in the computer and business methods areas. (Length: 26:11) Download MP3Bereskin & Parr LLPRobert Fischer of Fitzpatrick Cella Harper & Scinto in New York City discusses the history and recent cases involving patentable subject matter in the computer and business methods areas. (Length: 26:11) Download MP3JurisDiction,Law,Intellectual,Property,Toronto,IP,Legal,IP,patent,trademark,copyright,iplawpodcast,com,trade,mark,trade,mark,intellectual,property December 2011 – Episode 20 http://iplawpodcast.com/2011/12/07/december-2011-episode-20/ http://iplawpodcast.com/2011/12/07/december-2011-episode-20/#comments Wed, 07 Dec 2011 06:42:44 +0000 don@cameronmackendrick.com (Bereskin & Parr LLP) http://iplawpodcast.jurisdiction.com/?p=77 Gareth Morgan of Winston & Strawn LLP, London, England explains the Human Genome Sciences v. Eli Lilly decision of the UK Supreme Court and the meaning of “industrial applicability” for protein related inventions. (Length: 35:19)

Download MP3

]]> http://iplawpodcast.com/2011/12/07/december-2011-episode-20/feed/ 0 noGareth Morgan of Winston & Strawn LLP, London, England explains the Human Genome Sciences v. Eli Lilly decision of the UK Supreme Court and the meaning of “industrial applicability” for protein related inventions. (Length: 35:19) Download Bereskin & Parr LLPGareth Morgan of Winston & Strawn LLP, London, England explains the Human Genome Sciences v. Eli Lilly decision of the UK Supreme Court and the meaning of “industrial applicability” for protein related inventions. (Length: 35:19) Download MP3JurisDiction,Law,Intellectual,Property,Toronto,IP,Legal,IP,patent,trademark,copyright,iplawpodcast,com,trade,mark,trade,mark,intellectual,property November 2011 – Episode 19 http://iplawpodcast.com/2011/11/26/november-2011-episode-19/ http://iplawpodcast.com/2011/11/26/november-2011-episode-19/#comments Sat, 26 Nov 2011 06:42:05 +0000 don@cameronmackendrick.com (Bereskin & Parr LLP) http://iplawpodcast.jurisdiction.com/?p=75 Bart Showalter of Baker Botts LLP in Dallas, Texas on “The Top US Patent Decisions of 2010-2011” and why these decisions were worthy of receiving a “Markey” award for their individual category. (Length: 34:12)

Download MP3

]]> http://iplawpodcast.com/2011/11/26/november-2011-episode-19/feed/ 0 noBart Showalter of Baker Botts LLP in Dallas, Texas on “The Top US Patent Decisions of 2010-2011” and why these decisions were worthy of receiving a “Markey” award for their individual category. (Length: 34:12) Download MP3Bereskin & Parr LLPBart Showalter of Baker Botts LLP in Dallas, Texas on “The Top US Patent Decisions of 2010-2011” and why these decisions were worthy of receiving a “Markey” award for their individual category. (Length: 34:12) Download MP3JurisDiction,Law,Intellectual,Property,Toronto,IP,Legal,IP,patent,trademark,copyright,iplawpodcast,com,trade,mark,trade,mark,intellectual,property December 2010 – Episode 18 http://iplawpodcast.com/2010/12/12/december-2010-episode-18/ http://iplawpodcast.com/2010/12/12/december-2010-episode-18/#comments Sun, 12 Dec 2010 06:41:25 +0000 don@cameronmackendrick.com (Bereskin & Parr LLP) http://iplawpodcast.jurisdiction.com/?p=73 Paul England of the London Office of Simmons & Simmons discusses “Cross-border Injunctions in Europe” (Length: 18:22)

Download MP3

]]> http://iplawpodcast.com/2010/12/12/december-2010-episode-18/feed/ 0 noPaul England of the London Office of Simmons & Simmons discusses “Cross-border Injunctions in Europe” (Length: 18:22) Download MP3Bereskin & Parr LLPPaul England of the London Office of Simmons & Simmons discusses “Cross-border Injunctions in Europe” (Length: 18:22) Download MP3JurisDiction,Law,Intellectual,Property,Toronto,IP,Legal,IP,patent,trademark,copyright,iplawpodcast,com,trade,mark,trade,mark,intellectual,property November 2010 – Episode 17 http://iplawpodcast.com/2010/11/22/november-2010-episode-17/ http://iplawpodcast.com/2010/11/22/november-2010-episode-17/#comments Mon, 22 Nov 2010 06:40:27 +0000 don@cameronmackendrick.com (Bereskin & Parr LLP) http://iplawpodcast.jurisdiction.com/?p=71 Thomas M. Williams of Howrey’s False Marking Task Force in Chicago, Illinois: “False Patent Marking and the Solo Cup Case”.

Donald M. Cameron of Cameron MacKendrick LLP, Toronto, Canada: “The Amazon.com one-click Canadian Patent Decision” (Length: 14:24)

Download MP3

]]> http://iplawpodcast.com/2010/11/22/november-2010-episode-17/feed/ 0 noThomas M. Williams of Howrey’s False Marking Task Force in Chicago, Illinois: “False Patent Marking and the Solo Cup Case”. Donald M. Cameron of Cameron MacKendrick LLP, Toronto, Canada: “The Amazon.com one-click Canadian Patent Decision” (Length: 14:24) Bereskin & Parr LLPThomas M. Williams of Howrey’s False Marking Task Force in Chicago, Illinois: “False Patent Marking and the Solo Cup Case”. Donald M. Cameron of Cameron MacKendrick LLP, Toronto, Canada: “The Amazon.com one-click Canadian Patent Decision” (Length: 14:24) Download MP3JurisDiction,Law,Intellectual,Property,Toronto,IP,Legal,IP,patent,trademark,copyright,iplawpodcast,com,trade,mark,trade,mark,intellectual,property October 2010 – Episode 16 http://iplawpodcast.com/2010/10/09/october-2010-episode-16/ http://iplawpodcast.com/2010/10/09/october-2010-episode-16/#comments Sat, 09 Oct 2010 06:39:42 +0000 don@cameronmackendrick.com (Bereskin & Parr LLP) http://iplawpodcast.jurisdiction.com/?p=69 Continue reading →]]> Christopher Marchese of Fish & Richardson, San Diego, California: “Runaway Patent Damages Awards: Is Statutory Reform on the Way?” See also Chris’ Patent Damages blog, on Twitter (patentdamages), the F&R patent damages web page and Patent Damages Law and Practice book. (Length: 15:13)

Download MP3

]]> http://iplawpodcast.com/2010/10/09/october-2010-episode-16/feed/ 0 noChristopher Marchese of Fish & Richardson, San Diego, California: “Runaway Patent Damages Awards: Is Statutory Reform on the Way?” See also Chris’ Patent Damages blog, on Twitter (patentdamages), the F&R patent damages web pageBereskin & Parr LLPChristopher Marchese of Fish & Richardson, San Diego, California: “Runaway Patent Damages Awards: Is Statutory Reform on the Way?” See also Chris’ Patent Damages blog, on Twitter (patentdamages), the F&R patent damages web page and Patent Damages Law and Practice … Continue reading →JurisDiction,Law,Intellectual,Property,Toronto,IP,Legal,IP,patent,trademark,copyright,iplawpodcast,com,trade,mark,trade,mark,intellectual,property September 2010 – Episode 15 http://iplawpodcast.com/2010/09/09/september-2010-episode-15/ http://iplawpodcast.com/2010/09/09/september-2010-episode-15/#comments Thu, 09 Sep 2010 06:38:52 +0000 don@cameronmackendrick.com (Bereskin & Parr LLP) http://iplawpodcast.jurisdiction.com/?p=67 DeAnn Smith of Foley Hoag LLP in Boston, Mass.: “Chemically Complicated: Effective Arguments to Combat “Obvious to Try” Rejections with respect to Takeda and the Chemical Arts“. (Length: 14:24)

Download MP3

]]> http://iplawpodcast.com/2010/09/09/september-2010-episode-15/feed/ 0 noDeAnn Smith of Foley Hoag LLP in Boston, Mass.: “Chemically Complicated: Effective Arguments to Combat “Obvious to Try” Rejections with respect to Takeda and the Chemical Arts“. (Length: 14:24) Download MP3Bereskin & Parr LLPDeAnn Smith of Foley Hoag LLP in Boston, Mass.: “Chemically Complicated: Effective Arguments to Combat “Obvious to Try” Rejections with respect to Takeda and the Chemical Arts“. (Length: 14:24) Download MP3JurisDiction,Law,Intellectual,Property,Toronto,IP,Legal,IP,patent,trademark,copyright,iplawpodcast,com,trade,mark,trade,mark,intellectual,property August 2010 – Episode 14 http://iplawpodcast.com/2010/08/29/august-2010-episode-14/ http://iplawpodcast.com/2010/08/29/august-2010-episode-14/#comments Sun, 29 Aug 2010 06:38:05 +0000 don@cameronmackendrick.com (Bereskin & Parr LLP) http://iplawpodcast.jurisdiction.com/?p=65 Frederick L. Whitmer of Kilpatrick Stockton LLP in New York City explains the Cybor Uncertainty Principle in “Claim Construction in Patent Law: A Question of Law?”. (Length: 30:37)

Download MP3

]]> http://iplawpodcast.com/2010/08/29/august-2010-episode-14/feed/ 0 noFrederick L. Whitmer of Kilpatrick Stockton LLP in New York City explains the Cybor Uncertainty Principle in “Claim Construction in Patent Law: A Question of Law?”. (Length: 30:37) Download MP3Bereskin & Parr LLPFrederick L. Whitmer of Kilpatrick Stockton LLP in New York City explains the Cybor Uncertainty Principle in “Claim Construction in Patent Law: A Question of Law?”. (Length: 30:37) Download MP3JurisDiction,Law,Intellectual,Property,Toronto,IP,Legal,IP,patent,trademark,copyright,iplawpodcast,com,trade,mark,trade,mark,intellectual,property July 2010 – Episode 13 http://iplawpodcast.com/2010/07/18/july-2010-episode-13/ http://iplawpodcast.com/2010/07/18/july-2010-episode-13/#comments Sun, 18 Jul 2010 06:37:11 +0000 don@cameronmackendrick.com (Bereskin & Parr LLP) http://iplawpodcast.jurisdiction.com/?p=63 Dale Lazar, of DLA Piper in Reston, Virginia discusses the Supreme Court of the United State’s Bilski decision on the patentability of business methods. (Length: 17:00)

Download MP3

]]> http://iplawpodcast.com/2010/07/18/july-2010-episode-13/feed/ 0 noDale Lazar, of DLA Piper in Reston, Virginia discusses the Supreme Court of the United State’s Bilski decision on the patentability of business methods. (Length: 17:00) Download MP3Bereskin & Parr LLPDale Lazar, of DLA Piper in Reston, Virginia discusses the Supreme Court of the United State’s Bilski decision on the patentability of business methods. (Length: 17:00) Download MP3JurisDiction,Law,Intellectual,Property,Toronto,IP,Legal,IP,patent,trademark,copyright,iplawpodcast,com,trade,mark,trade,mark,intellectual,property December 2009 – Episode 12 http://iplawpodcast.com/2009/12/15/december-2009-episode-12/ http://iplawpodcast.com/2009/12/15/december-2009-episode-12/#comments Tue, 15 Dec 2009 06:36:23 +0000 don@cameronmackendrick.com (Bereskin & Parr LLP) http://iplawpodcast.jurisdiction.com/?p=61 Jennifer Silverman of Ellenoff Grossman and Schole LLP in New York City discusses U.S. trademark dilution and the Dec. 3, 2009 decision in Starbucks vs. Wolfe’s Borough (Charbucks) lawsuit. (Length: 17:00)

Download MP3

]]> http://iplawpodcast.com/2009/12/15/december-2009-episode-12/feed/ 0 noJennifer Silverman of Ellenoff Grossman and Schole LLP in New York City discusses U.S. trademark dilution and the Dec. 3, 2009 decision in Starbucks vs. Wolfe’s Borough (Charbucks) lawsuit. (Length: 17:00) Download MP3Bereskin & Parr LLPJennifer Silverman of Ellenoff Grossman and Schole LLP in New York City discusses U.S. trademark dilution and the Dec. 3, 2009 decision in Starbucks vs. Wolfe’s Borough (Charbucks) lawsuit. (Length: 17:00) Download MP3JurisDiction,Law,Intellectual,Property,Toronto,IP,Legal,IP,patent,trademark,copyright,iplawpodcast,com,trade,mark,trade,mark,intellectual,property November 2009 – Episode 11 http://iplawpodcast.com/2009/11/15/november-2009-episode-11/ http://iplawpodcast.com/2009/11/15/november-2009-episode-11/#comments Sun, 15 Nov 2009 06:35:40 +0000 don@cameronmackendrick.com (Bereskin & Parr LLP) http://iplawpodcast.jurisdiction.com/?p=59 Continue reading →]]> The New Jersey Patent Rules – one year later. Guests Stephen Roth of Lerner David Littenberg Krumholz and Mentlik, LLP in Westfield, New Jersey and Philip Johnson, Chief Intellectual Property Counsel at Johnson and Johnson in New Brunswick, New Jersey discuss how patent cases are now litigated in New Jersey. Roth slides. (Length: 34:25)

Download MP3

]]> http://iplawpodcast.com/2009/11/15/november-2009-episode-11/feed/ 0 noThe New Jersey Patent Rules – one year later. Guests Stephen Roth of Lerner David Littenberg Krumholz and Mentlik, LLP in Westfield, New Jersey and Philip Johnson, Chief Intellectual Property Counsel at Johnson and Johnson in New Brunswick, New Jersey &#8Bereskin & Parr LLPThe New Jersey Patent Rules – one year later. Guests Stephen Roth of Lerner David Littenberg Krumholz and Mentlik, LLP in Westfield, New Jersey and Philip Johnson, Chief Intellectual Property Counsel at Johnson and Johnson in New Brunswick, New Jersey … Continue reading →JurisDiction,Law,Intellectual,Property,Toronto,IP,Legal,IP,patent,trademark,copyright,iplawpodcast,com,trade,mark,trade,mark,intellectual,property October 2009 – Episode 10 http://iplawpodcast.com/2009/10/15/october-2009-episode-10/ http://iplawpodcast.com/2009/10/15/october-2009-episode-10/#comments Thu, 15 Oct 2009 06:35:19 +0000 don@cameronmackendrick.com (Bereskin & Parr LLP) http://iplawpodcast.jurisdiction.com/?p=56 Continue reading →]]> In Re Bose and Fraud on the US Trademarks Office regarding declarations of use. Guests: Jonathan Hudis of Oblon, Spivak, McClelland, Maier and Neustadt, LLP and Kimberley Seluga of Sunstein Kann Murphy & Timbers LLP Bose case comment. (Length: 16:54)

Download MP3

]]> http://iplawpodcast.com/2009/10/15/october-2009-episode-10/feed/ 0 noIn Re Bose and Fraud on the US Trademarks Office regarding declarations of use. Guests: Jonathan Hudis of Oblon, Spivak, McClelland, Maier and Neustadt, LLP and Kimberley Seluga of Sunstein Kann Murphy & Timbers LLP Bose case comment. (Length: 16:54) Bereskin & Parr LLPIn Re Bose and Fraud on the US Trademarks Office regarding declarations of use. Guests: Jonathan Hudis of Oblon, Spivak, McClelland, Maier and Neustadt, LLP and Kimberley Seluga of Sunstein Kann Murphy & Timbers LLP Bose case comment. (Length: 16:54) … Continue reading →JurisDiction,Law,Intellectual,Property,Toronto,IP,Legal,IP,patent,trademark,copyright,iplawpodcast,com,trade,mark,trade,mark,intellectual,property September 2009 – Episode 9 http://iplawpodcast.com/2009/09/28/september-2009-episode-9/ http://iplawpodcast.com/2009/09/28/september-2009-episode-9/#comments Mon, 28 Sep 2009 06:34:01 +0000 don@cameronmackendrick.com (Bereskin & Parr LLP) http://iplawpodcast.jurisdiction.com/?p=54 Krista Schwartz of Jones Day on “Software and Scenes a Faire” in computer copyright cases and Charles Weiss of Kenyon and Kenyon on “Ariad: Federal Circuit to Consider Existence of Written Description Requirement”. (Length: 39:16)

Download MP3

]]> http://iplawpodcast.com/2009/09/28/september-2009-episode-9/feed/ 0 noKrista Schwartz of Jones Day on “Software and Scenes a Faire” in computer copyright cases and Charles Weiss of Kenyon and Kenyon on “Ariad: Federal Circuit to Consider Existence of Written Description Requirement”. (Length: 39:16) Download MP3Bereskin & Parr LLPKrista Schwartz of Jones Day on “Software and Scenes a Faire” in computer copyright cases and Charles Weiss of Kenyon and Kenyon on “Ariad: Federal Circuit to Consider Existence of Written Description Requirement”. (Length: 39:16) Download MP3JurisDiction,Law,Intellectual,Property,Toronto,IP,Legal,IP,patent,trademark,copyright,iplawpodcast,com,trade,mark,trade,mark,intellectual,property August 2009 – Episode 8 http://iplawpodcast.com/2009/08/19/august-2009-episode-8/ http://iplawpodcast.com/2009/08/19/august-2009-episode-8/#comments Wed, 19 Aug 2009 06:33:24 +0000 don@cameronmackendrick.com (Bereskin & Parr LLP) http://iplawpodcast.jurisdiction.com/?p=51 Continue reading →]]> Niri Shanmuganathan of the London office of Taylor Wessing discusses Liability for User Generated Content on the Internet and Ed Reines of the Silicon Valley office of Weil, Gotshal and Manges LLP discusses Interlocutory Appeals of Claim Construction in the Patent Reform Act of 2009. (Length: 26:40)

Download MP3

]]> http://iplawpodcast.com/2009/08/19/august-2009-episode-8/feed/ 0 noNiri Shanmuganathan of the London office of Taylor Wessing discusses Liability for User Generated Content on the Internet and Ed Reines of the Silicon Valley office of Weil, Gotshal and Manges LLP discusses Interlocutory Appeals of Claim Construction in tBereskin & Parr LLPNiri Shanmuganathan of the London office of Taylor Wessing discusses Liability for User Generated Content on the Internet and Ed Reines of the Silicon Valley office of Weil, Gotshal and Manges LLP discusses Interlocutory Appeals of Claim Construction in the … Continue reading →JurisDiction,Law,Intellectual,Property,Toronto,IP,Legal,IP,patent,trademark,copyright,iplawpodcast,com,trade,mark,trade,mark,intellectual,property July 2009 – Episode 7 http://iplawpodcast.com/2009/07/12/july-2009-episode-7/ http://iplawpodcast.com/2009/07/12/july-2009-episode-7/#comments Sun, 12 Jul 2009 04:55:03 +0000 don@cameronmackendrick.com (Bereskin & Parr LLP) http://iplawpodcast.jurisdiction.com/?p=22 Continue reading →]]> Chris Hansen of the ACLU in New York City and Warren Woessner of Schwegman Lundberg Woessner in Minneapolis discuss the Complaint filed by doctor and patient groups against the patents on the BRCA1 and BRCA2 cancer genes exclusively licensed to Myriad Genetics and their attack on gene patents on constitutional grounds. See also Warren Woessner’s blog’s comment on the lawsuit at patents4life.com.

Download MP3

]]> http://iplawpodcast.com/2009/07/12/july-2009-episode-7/feed/ 0 noChris Hansen of the ACLU in New York City and Warren Woessner of Schwegman Lundberg Woessner in Minneapolis discuss the Complaint filed by doctor and patient groups against the patents on the BRCA1 and BRCA2 cancer genes exclusively licensed to … CoBereskin & Parr LLPChris Hansen of the ACLU in New York City and Warren Woessner of Schwegman Lundberg Woessner in Minneapolis discuss the Complaint filed by doctor and patient groups against the patents on the BRCA1 and BRCA2 cancer genes exclusively licensed to … Continue reading →JurisDiction,Law,Intellectual,Property,Toronto,IP,Legal,IP,patent,trademark,copyright,iplawpodcast,com,trade,mark,trade,mark,intellectual,property June 2009 – Episode 6 http://iplawpodcast.com/2009/06/12/june-2009-episode-6/ http://iplawpodcast.com/2009/06/12/june-2009-episode-6/#comments Fri, 12 Jun 2009 04:51:35 +0000 don@cameronmackendrick.com (Bereskin & Parr LLP) http://iplawpodcast.jurisdiction.com/?p=20 Continue reading →]]> The Honourable Michael Black AC, the Chief Justice of the Federal Court of Australia, discusses the Fast Track Direction that affects trade-mark and copyright cases issued April 2009. It is part of an aggressive overhaul of the case management and individual docket system the Court has instigated to make litigation faster, more efficient and less expensive. The Court has similar procedures for patent, tax and admiralty cases.

See also the Canadian Federal Court’s Practice Direction on Streamlining Complex Litigation. (Length: 34:52)

Download MP3

]]> http://iplawpodcast.com/2009/06/12/june-2009-episode-6/feed/ 0 noThe Honourable Michael Black AC, the Chief Justice of the Federal Court of Australia, discusses the Fast Track Direction that affects trade-mark and copyright cases issued April 2009. It is part of an aggressive overhaul of the case management and …Bereskin & Parr LLPThe Honourable Michael Black AC, the Chief Justice of the Federal Court of Australia, discusses the Fast Track Direction that affects trade-mark and copyright cases issued April 2009. It is part of an aggressive overhaul of the case management and … Continue reading →JurisDiction,Law,Intellectual,Property,Toronto,IP,Legal,IP,patent,trademark,copyright,iplawpodcast,com,trade,mark,trade,mark,intellectual,property May 2009 – Episode 5 http://iplawpodcast.com/2009/05/30/may-2009-episode-5/ http://iplawpodcast.com/2009/05/30/may-2009-episode-5/#comments Sat, 30 May 2009 04:37:04 +0000 don@cameronmackendrick.com (Bereskin & Parr LLP) http://iplawpodcast.jurisdiction.com/?p=16 Continue reading →]]> The Right Honourable Sir Robin Jacob of the Court of Appeal of England and Wales discusses his submissions to the European Commission Pharma Sector Inquiry.

Baila Celedonia of Cowan Liebowitz and Latman of New York City discusses Honda v. Winkelmann and the right way and the wrong way to apply for a U.S. intention to use trademark application based on a foreign registration. (case comment) (Length 28:20)

Download MP3

]]> http://iplawpodcast.com/2009/05/30/may-2009-episode-5/feed/ 0 noThe Right Honourable Sir Robin Jacob of the Court of Appeal of England and Wales discusses his submissions to the European Commission Pharma Sector Inquiry. Baila Celedonia of Cowan Liebowitz and Latman of New York City discusses Honda v. Winkelmann &#823Bereskin & Parr LLPThe Right Honourable Sir Robin Jacob of the Court of Appeal of England and Wales discusses his submissions to the European Commission Pharma Sector Inquiry. Baila Celedonia of Cowan Liebowitz and Latman of New York City discusses Honda v. Winkelmann … Continue reading →JurisDiction,Law,Intellectual,Property,Toronto,IP,Legal,IP,patent,trademark,copyright,iplawpodcast,com,trade,mark,trade,mark,intellectual,property April 2009 – Episode 4 http://iplawpodcast.com/2009/04/24/april-2009-episode-4/ http://iplawpodcast.com/2009/04/24/april-2009-episode-4/#comments Fri, 24 Apr 2009 04:35:44 +0000 don@cameronmackendrick.com (Bereskin & Parr LLP) http://iplawpodcast.jurisdiction.com/?p=14 Continue reading →]]> Rowan Freeland of Simmons and Simmons in London discusses the UK House of Lords decision in Lundbeck on sufficiency of disclosure in UK patents. See also his case comment.

Robert Yoches of Finnegan in Washington, D.C. discusses US patent practice in the wake of In Re Bilski. Also listen to his Webinar. (Length: 30:46)

Download MP3

]]> http://iplawpodcast.com/2009/04/24/april-2009-episode-4/feed/ 0 noRowan Freeland of Simmons and Simmons in London discusses the UK House of Lords decision in Lundbeck on sufficiency of disclosure in UK patents. See also his case comment. Robert Yoches of Finnegan in Washington, D.C. discusses US patent practice … Bereskin & Parr LLPRowan Freeland of Simmons and Simmons in London discusses the UK House of Lords decision in Lundbeck on sufficiency of disclosure in UK patents. See also his case comment. Robert Yoches of Finnegan in Washington, D.C. discusses US patent practice … Continue reading →JurisDiction,Law,Intellectual,Property,Toronto,IP,Legal,IP,patent,trademark,copyright,iplawpodcast,com,trade,mark,trade,mark,intellectual,property March 2009 – Episode 3 http://iplawpodcast.com/2009/03/01/march-2009-episode-3/ http://iplawpodcast.com/2009/03/01/march-2009-episode-3/#comments Sun, 01 Mar 2009 04:34:16 +0000 don@cameronmackendrick.com (Bereskin & Parr LLP) http://iplawpodcast.jurisdiction.com/?p=12 Continue reading →]]> Guest Geoffrey Lin of Lovells in Shanghai, discusses strategies and tactics for enforcing intellectual property rights against counterfeiters in China, the topic of a paper he presented at the Mid-Winter meeting of the AIPLA in Miami in January, 2009. (Length: 30:48)

Download MP3

]]> http://iplawpodcast.com/2009/03/01/march-2009-episode-3/feed/ 0 noGuest Geoffrey Lin of Lovells in Shanghai, discusses strategies and tactics for enforcing intellectual property rights against counterfeiters in China, the topic of a paper he presented at the Mid-Winter meeting of the AIPLA in Miami in January, 2009. (LeBereskin & Parr LLPGuest Geoffrey Lin of Lovells in Shanghai, discusses strategies and tactics for enforcing intellectual property rights against counterfeiters in China, the topic of a paper he presented at the Mid-Winter meeting of the AIPLA in Miami in January, 2009. (Length: … Continue reading →JurisDiction,Law,Intellectual,Property,Toronto,IP,Legal,IP,patent,trademark,copyright,iplawpodcast,com,trade,mark,trade,mark,intellectual,property February 2009 – Episode 2 http://iplawpodcast.com/2009/02/01/february-2009-episode-2/ http://iplawpodcast.com/2009/02/01/february-2009-episode-2/#comments Sun, 01 Feb 2009 04:31:55 +0000 don@cameronmackendrick.com (Bereskin & Parr LLP) http://iplawpodcast.jurisdiction.com/?p=10 Guest Dianne Elderkin, a partner with the intellectual property law firm of Woodcock Washburn in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania discusses the case of In Re Seagate and how it has changed the U.S. test for willful patent infringement. (Length: 21:56)

Download MP3

]]> http://iplawpodcast.com/2009/02/01/february-2009-episode-2/feed/ 0 noGuest Dianne Elderkin, a partner with the intellectual property law firm of Woodcock Washburn in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania discusses the case of In Re Seagate and how it has changed the U.S. test for willful patent infringement. (Length: 21:56) Download Bereskin & Parr LLPGuest Dianne Elderkin, a partner with the intellectual property law firm of Woodcock Washburn in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania discusses the case of In Re Seagate and how it has changed the U.S. test for willful patent infringement. (Length: 21:56) Download MP3JurisDiction,Law,Intellectual,Property,Toronto,IP,Legal,IP,patent,trademark,copyright,iplawpodcast,com,trade,mark,trade,mark,intellectual,property January 2009 – Episode 1 http://iplawpodcast.com/2009/01/01/january-2009-episode-1/ http://iplawpodcast.com/2009/01/01/january-2009-episode-1/#comments Thu, 01 Jan 2009 04:27:19 +0000 don@cameronmackendrick.com (Bereskin & Parr LLP) http://iplawpodcast.jurisdiction.com/?p=7 Continue reading →]]> Guest Joseph N. Welch II of Pattishall, McAuliffe, Newbury, Hilliard and Geraldson LLP of Chicago, Illinois discusses two of the most interesting U.S. trademark cases of 2008.

He chose North American Medical Corporation v. Axiom Worldwide Inc., 522 F.3d 1211 (11th Cir. 2008) and ITC Ltd. v. Punchgini, 518 F.3d 159 (2d Cir. 2008) (Length: 31:38)

Download MP3

]]> http://iplawpodcast.com/2009/01/01/january-2009-episode-1/feed/ 0 noGuest Joseph N. Welch II of Pattishall, McAuliffe, Newbury, Hilliard and Geraldson LLP of Chicago, Illinois discusses two of the most interesting U.S. trademark cases of 2008. He chose North American Medical Corporation v. Axiom Worldwide Inc., 522 F.3d 1Bereskin & Parr LLPGuest Joseph N. Welch II of Pattishall, McAuliffe, Newbury, Hilliard and Geraldson LLP of Chicago, Illinois discusses two of the most interesting U.S. trademark cases of 2008. He chose North American Medical Corporation v. Axiom Worldwide Inc., 522 F.3d 1211 … Continue reading →JurisDiction,Law,Intellectual,Property,Toronto,IP,Legal,IP,patent,trademark,copyright,iplawpodcast,com,trade,mark,trade,mark,intellectual,property Bereskin & Parr LLPnonadultThe International Intellectual Property Law Podcast