Sadly, it is useless and frustrating to attempt to explain it to Liberals because they cannot differentiate between progress and change. Trying to explain Conservatism to them is very much akin to trying to explain the color blue to a born-blind person.

Obama is a creature of words and, as such, his words provide the definition of the boy who would be America’s ruler and who has been foolishly installed as the POTUS. Most telling of the words that define Obama are, “I” and the variant forms of, “Them,” and how he uses them to define the narrative surrounding himself and, extension, how the boy seeks to define himself and his place in history and the American narrative.

Obama loves to use “I” whenever someone does something that is laudable in order to insinuate himself into the situation and take credit for it’s happening. Conversely, he will always speak of “Them” whenever something is unpleasant, wrong, or criminal in order to shield himself from any blame being attached to him.

That’s Obama’s defining narrative. Taking all the credit and none of the blame, in both cases whether deserved or not.

A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the People to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.

– US Constitution, 2nd Amendment

Liberals and Progressives just can’t seem to understand the meaning of either, “the People” or “Shall not be infringed.”

To be fair, social conservatives & the religious right have an equally poor understanding of, “Bear arms” and “Shall not be infringed” when it comes to queers and women in the military.

The Left is, not wholly undeservedly, shocked and appalled by the violent crime rates in America and the force multiplier that firearms provide to the criminal classes. Hence, they are more than willing to violate the natural rights of Americans in order to provide the appearance of greater security to the people as a whole.

[sic]…if there is a step we can take that will save even one child from what happened in Newtown, we should take that step.

– Barack Obama
January 14, 2013

This is, at its core, a case of consequentialism trumping deontology. It is also a case of blaming the tools for actions of those who use them. Worse, it doesn’t even begin to address the underlying problems of violence and crime within America’s borders.

Their logic would be better used, insofar as utility and effect is concerned, by apply the Liberals’ and Progressives’ pogrom to the “Black Community.” Blacks, who only make up approximately 13% of the US population, are disproportionately represented in the “criminal classes.” They consistently account for:

• 50% of the homicides;
• 45% of the violent crimes;
• 39% of the overall crimes in the US;
• and 28% of the repeat / career criminals.

Given these figures, if “reasonable restrictions” are going to be placed upon Constitutional rights, America would be far better served by restricting the freedoms enumerate in the 13 Amendment as opposed to the 2nd Amendment.

Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.

– US Constitution, 13th Amendment, Section 1

America could slash its crime rate, especially its violent crime rate, by simply utilizing penal servitude and putting the criminal Blacks back in chains and putting them to the work that Americans instead rely upon illegal immigrants and foreign labor to perform.

123►

Even better, unlike the Left’s attacks upon the sanctity of the 2nd Amendment, no such attack upon the 13th Amendment is needed. It already contains the exception that the government, be it Federal or State, continues to have the right to hold slaves if such slavery was enacted as a punishment for a crime.

If there is a step we can take that will save even one child from what happens regularly in Chicago, we should take that step.

– jonolan
June 03, 2013

There is no reasonable and/or rational doubt that, if we’re to abridge the liberties enumerated in- and protected by the Constitution for the laudable sake of public safety and security, such abridgements need to be effective. Returning those Blacks who cannot or will not become a viable facet of American society to slavery would be vastly more effective than trying to disarm law abiding American citizens.

And, once again in order to drive home one the more salient points of this argument, these proposed “reasonable restriction” on the freedoms Blacks enjoy thanks to the 13th Amendment don’t require that the amendment in question be changed or violated.

Are You Offended?

If you’re an American – or a total foreigner to America reading this article from afar – and you’re offended by it, I’m glad; it’s an utterly offensive though, likely, effective idea. Conversely, if you’re on of America’s domestic enemies, the Liberals and Progressives, you’ve neither the right nor the privilege of being offended by it as this is just the application of your own logic to a different Amendment of the Constitution than the ones you and your sort normally attack.

For Love Of Country

By and large these men and women joined up for the simple reason of their love of their country. That’s the singular reason why they chose to write a blank check to their nation, payable upon their lives, their minds, and their very souls if needs be.

Here’s the thing; it’s all bullshit!

Yes, given the boy’s track record, Obama’s use of his favorite “house negro,” Holder’s DoJ to assault AP and investigate their reporters’ sources is an easy target for Americans to verbally fire upon. It’s easy to see this behavior as another prima facie example of Obama’s desire for tyranny and his despite for America’s constitution. That doesn’t mean that this is the right way to approach this particular situation.

By all the accounts that we have, including AP’s own assessment of the Obama Regime’s rationale for the seizure of their telephone records, the DoJ is investigating who leaked sensitive intelligence data to the press. It is likely the result of a May 7, 2012 article that revealed the CIA thwarted a bomb plot planned to originate out of Yemen to avenge the death of former al-Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden, who was killed by US Navy SEALs one year earlier.

This is well within the purview of Executive and is a matter of national security. We have to trace the leaks and take whatever steps are needed to prevent a repeat offense. There is no intrinsic difference between the leak to Associated Press and the Leaks to Wikileaks and I sincerely doubt that there’s a single American who say that any investigation into- or reprisal against Wikileaks and/or its sources was wrong.

Obama and his cabal may well be engaging in this behavior for the wrong reason but their actions are consistent in this instance with the best interests of America. We should remember that surprising fact.

With American workers fleeing the unions in droves, the International Brotherhood of Teamsters has chosen to raid other unions for members. Currently, their trying to pouch the US Airways and American Airlines mehanics from their existing unions. This is causing a lot of anger in the unions the Teamsters have targeted as prey.

As a trade unionist, I’m outraged and disgusted that the Teamsters plan to waste the time and resources of their members in an unprincipled raid against union members at US Airways. Let’s call this what it is: The IBT is behaving like a parasite. They are desperately attempting to feed off another organization to cover up their own failures. This has everything to do with the Bureau of Labor Statistics reporting that the IBT lost more members than any other union last year and nothing to do with the needs of aircraft mechanics.

– Garry Drummond
Air Transport Division Director, TWU

To be heartlessly fair though, nobody – not even the filth who run the labor soviets – should be surprised by this behavior. The Teamsters have a long and infamous history or predatory practices. Throughout the decades of their unfortunate existence they’re raided and sought to destroy union after union. That’s part of why they finally left AFL-CIO which tried to curtail that sort of behavior.

For Americans though, this is good news. Whenever the unions feast upon each other instead of the productive American population its a good thing.

Thoughts that Americans might retake our country by and and all means, including armed revolution, really bothers them…and it should.

Conversely, Americans should not be in the least bit shocked that almost a third of their fellows think that civil war we are engaged in will “heat up” and that blood, fire, and steel will decide the future, if there is to be, of America. All we all have to do is listen to the Liberals’ politicians to see that tyranny is fast approaching.

When you catch New Jersey State Senators Loretta Weinberg (D-37), Sandra Cunningham (D-31), Linda Greenstein (D-14) calling for outright confiscation and disarmament of the People, it becomes obvious that the the thoughts of defending our Liberties through force must be considered. This is especially true when the worthless filth in question are the NJ Senate Majority leader, the Senate Majority Whip, and the Assistant Senate Majority leader respectively.

We needed a bill that was going to confiscate, confiscate, confiscate.

They don’t care about the bad guys. All they want to do is have their little guns and do whatever they want with them.

As all know, our domestic enemies are not stupid enough to believe that what they claim are reasonable restrictions would achieve their stated goals of reducing firearm-based violence. Of course, their stated goals and their real ones are two wildly disparate things.

Creatures like Weinberg, Cunningham, and Greenstein know that Americans do in fact care about the “bad guys” and that these three in the current forefront of those “bad guys.” This, more than anything else is both why they want Americans disarmed and why their ilk is so horrified by the rising call of revolution. They know that they and their families will be exterminated in the course of America’s rebirth.

~*~

Keep your eyes open. Travel light but load heavy, and always put another round in the enemy after they’re down.

It’s safe to say that Obama and his cronies are less than pleased that this is happening. Obama absolutely loathes being questioned or held accountable by anyone for his behavior.

Silence! What Does It Matter?

The sad fact of the matter, however, is that this whole pageant bores me more than I can properly express. I just can’t force myself to care about it very much at all and I can’t for the life of me understand why anyone else, beyond the survivors and the families of the victims, care about it either.

Life’s Rough Justice

The victims: Stevens, Smith, Doherty, and Woods worked for Obama though, in Doherty’s, and Woods’ case this was quite indirectly as they were mercenaries the CIA contracted to provide physical security. Why would I care if Obama’s people died for any reason, much less while furthering his agenda or through his malfeasance?

Much like the shooting of Giffords or the Boston Marathon Bombing, Liberals, people employed by their own choice by Liberals, or people tacitly supporting Liberals by their presence died or were horribly injured. This does not raise any outrage in me at all.

Political Kabuki

These hearings are nothing but overly stylized political theater. They’re filled with much noise but contain no substance. Beyond a certain amount of political posturing in the run-up to the next Congressional elections, the Benghazi hearings serve no purpose at all so why would they interest me.

No matter what the House finds nothing will come of it because the Senate is in the hands of the Democrats and Sen. Reid and his ilk would turn a blind eye to any misdeed or crime committed by Obama and his people. That has already been proven by the Fast and Furious debacle.

~*~

Hellfire, People! This is just reality television and it’s boring because it’s meaningless.

This would be bad enough if he kept it to himself instead of spreading his corruption as far and wide as he can.

Sadly, Obama constantly tries to infect others with his ideology, much as a plague rat or an AIDS-infected rapist would. A current example would be the commencement address he gave to the graduating class of The Ohio State University on May 5, 2013.

Unfortunately, you’ve grown up hearing voices that incessantly warn of government as nothing more than some separate, sinister entity that’s at the root of all our problems. Some of these same voices also do their best to gum up the works. They’ll warn that tyranny always lurking just around the corner. You should reject these voices. Because what they suggest is that our brave, and creative, and unique experiment in self-rule is somehow just a sham with which we can’t be trusted.

– Barack Obama

Obama’s admonition to these graduates is a classic “Obamanism.” Of course he wants America’s youth to reject the truth and place their faith in the government, ignoring the fact that the government is increasingly aloof from we, the People and on the fast track to overt tyranny. Nothing that the boy wants to inflict upon America, the nation he loathes more than any other, can be achieved unless the population accepts the government as parent, overlord, and god.

Frankly, rejecting the warnings that tyranny always lurking just around the corner is how we Americans found ourselves in the horrific place we are now. It’s quite telling that Obama wants us to continue this folly.

A Weapon Guide For The Uninformed

Be forewarned though that this information is solely for bolstering your own position and confidence in it. Liberals and Progressives are not only uninformed of homicide statistics by class of weapon, they’re uninformable of such. Bludgeon them with facts – for now – in order to silence them, but don’t expect them to learn anything.