<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">

<channel>
	<title>JMBlog</title>
	
	<link>http://www.jmblog.com</link>
	<description>JMBlog - the web journal of Jere Matlock.  Fresh viewpoints on a wide range of subjects.  Opinions, essays, observations.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 24 Jan 2010 22:58:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/jerematlock" /><feedburner:info uri="jerematlock" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com" /><feedburner:browserFriendly></feedburner:browserFriendly><item>
		<title>How one determined drug addict spearheaded effective drug rehabilitation around the world</title>
		<link>http://www.jmblog.com/2010/01/08/how-one-determined-drug-addict-spearheaded-effective-drug-rehabilitation-around-the-world/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jmblog.com/2010/01/08/how-one-determined-drug-addict-spearheaded-effective-drug-rehabilitation-around-the-world/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 20:22:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jere Matlock</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>

	<!-- AutoMeta Start -->
	<category>willie</category>
	<category>benitez</category>
	<category>prison</category>
	<category>narconon</category>
	<category>addicts</category>
	<category>physiological</category>
	<category>visited</category>
	<category>addiction</category>
	<!-- AutoMeta End -->
	
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jmblog.com/?p=394</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The good folks over at Narconon recently put together this video about the early days of Narconon, which has now been saving lives for over 40 years.  </p>
<p></p>
<p>Although I found out about the Narconon <a href="http://www.narconon.org">drug rehabilitation</a> program in 1972 when I was working in Los Angeles, and I visited their drug rehab center, I never met <a href="http://www.narconon.org/about-narconon/william-benitez.html">Willie Benitez</a>.  But I heard the story; as an addict and prisoner at Arizona State Prison in the mid-1960&#8217;s, Willie figured out how to apply some of the information developed by<a href="http://www.lronhubbard.org"> L. Ron Hubbard</a>, founder of the <a href="http://www.scientology.org">Scientology</a> religion, to help himself and others overcome drug addiction.&#160;&#8230;</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The good folks over at Narconon recently put together this video about the early days of Narconon, which has now been saving lives for over 40 years.  </p>
<p><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/V7h_NOPEFAw&#038;hl=en_US&#038;fs=1&#038;rel=0&#038;color1=0xe1600f&#038;color2=0xfebd01"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/V7h_NOPEFAw&#038;hl=en_US&#038;fs=1&#038;rel=0&#038;color1=0xe1600f&#038;color2=0xfebd01" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object></p>
<p>Although I found out about the Narconon <a href="http://www.narconon.org">drug rehabilitation</a> program in 1972 when I was working in Los Angeles, and I visited their drug rehab center, I never met <a href="http://www.narconon.org/about-narconon/william-benitez.html">Willie Benitez</a>.  But I heard the story; as an addict and prisoner at Arizona State Prison in the mid-1960&#8217;s, Willie figured out how to apply some of the information developed by<a href="http://www.lronhubbard.org"> L. Ron Hubbard</a>, founder of the <a href="http://www.scientology.org">Scientology</a> religion, to help himself and others overcome drug addiction.  I was then and still am a Scientologist.  I visited the Narconon center then to see first-hand what they were doing.  It was very encouraging.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not just a matter of drug withdrawal.  These days that&#8217;s relatively easy.  There are reasons that people start taking drugs, and go back on drugs after a stint in drug rehab.  These reasons for going back on drugs have to do with loss of self-respect, lack of ability to communicate, inability to deal with other people in one&#8217;s circle of family and friends, lack of a personal moral code, and lack of the skills necessary to get and hold a job.  As well as the physiological pull that drugs have for people who have used them.  </p>
<p>The physiological aspects of drug addiction are handled, in large part, by doing a <a href="http://www.clearbodyclearmind.com/">purification program</a> that gets the drug residues sweated out of the fatty tissues in the body.  It&#8217;s a rigorous program (I&#8217;ve done it) and it is life-changing all by itself.</p>
<p>But what those who have become addicted to drugs really need are tools for dealing with other people and making a success of their lives.  </p>
<p>Willie Benitez recognized (while reading a book by Mr. Hubbard) that the practical drills in the book would help him and other addicts, and he adapted them for use in the prison system to help addicts learn to communicate, learn how to educate themselves,  and get out of the trap of drug addiction.</p>
<p>Willie turned down a parole so he could stay in prison and make sure the Narconon program he started there would continue to help drug addicts after his release from Prison.  That&#8217;s determination at work.  Willie Benitez, who passed away a few years ago, would be very proud of the work now being done by Narconon International to help educate people about drugs and to help addicts like him get off and stay off drugs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jmblog.com/2010/01/08/how-one-determined-drug-addict-spearheaded-effective-drug-rehabilitation-around-the-world/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Neal Fox video – “Ask Your Doctor” is a hoot</title>
		<link>http://www.jmblog.com/2010/01/05/new-neal-fox-video-ask-your-doctor-is-a-hoot/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jmblog.com/2010/01/05/new-neal-fox-video-ask-your-doctor-is-a-hoot/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 20:30:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jere Matlock</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Big Pharma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Psychiatric Abuse]]></category>

	<!-- AutoMeta Start -->
	<category>neal</category>
	<category>protect</category>
	<category>posits</category>
	<category>doctor</category>
	<category>purpose</category>
	<category>correct</category>
	<category>enjoy</category>
	<category>prescription</category>
	<!-- AutoMeta End -->
	
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jmblog.com/?p=392</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Love this new video from Neal Fox called &#8220;Ask your Doctor&#8221;.  Turn up the sound and enjoy!<br />
<br />
Be sure to read the text at the end: 100,000 people die from &#8220;correct&#8221; prescription drugs in the USA every year.  Neal posits that the purpose of the FDA is no longer to &#8220;protect the public&#8221;, but that the FDA&#8217;s purpose now is to &#8220;protect the drug companies.&#8221;  I think he&#8217;s on to something there&#8230;.</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Love this new video from Neal Fox called &#8220;Ask your Doctor&#8221;.  Turn up the sound and enjoy!<br />
<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/eaF6ZD0TweA&#038;hl=en_US&#038;fs=1&#038;rel=0"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/eaF6ZD0TweA&#038;hl=en_US&#038;fs=1&#038;rel=0" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object><br />
Be sure to read the text at the end: 100,000 people die from &#8220;correct&#8221; prescription drugs in the USA every year.  Neal posits that the purpose of the FDA is no longer to &#8220;protect the public&#8221;, but that the FDA&#8217;s purpose now is to &#8220;protect the drug companies.&#8221;  I think he&#8217;s on to something there&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jmblog.com/2010/01/05/new-neal-fox-video-ask-your-doctor-is-a-hoot/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Senator Jeff Merkley of Oregon — has no clue</title>
		<link>http://www.jmblog.com/2010/01/04/senator-jeff-merkley-of-oregon-has-no-clue/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jmblog.com/2010/01/04/senator-jeff-merkley-of-oregon-has-no-clue/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 17:46:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jere Matlock</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>

	<!-- AutoMeta Start -->
	<category>merkley</category>
	<category>obamacare</category>
	<category>jeff</category>
	<category>senator</category>
	<category>trillions</category>
	<category>fiscally</category>
	<category>faxed</category>
	<category>economy</category>
	<!-- AutoMeta End -->
	
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jmblog.com/?p=389</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I recently faxed Senator Jeff Merkley my reasons for opposing the massive Obamacare health plan that will put one sixth of the US economy under the Federal Government, at a cost of trillions of dollars.</p>
<p>His reply came a few days ago in the mail.  It&#8217;s an obvious form letter he sent to answer all those annoying faxes that mysteriously piled up in his office from the thousands of people like me who faxed him our objections and asked him, as our senator, not to vote for Obamacare, which he did anyway.</p>
<p>The gist of his message to me is this:  &#8220;I&#160;&#8230;</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I recently faxed Senator Jeff Merkley my reasons for opposing the massive Obamacare health plan that will put one sixth of the US economy under the Federal Government, at a cost of trillions of dollars.</p>
<p>His reply came a few days ago in the mail.  It&#8217;s an obvious form letter he sent to answer all those annoying faxes that mysteriously piled up in his office from the thousands of people like me who faxed him our objections and asked him, as our senator, not to vote for Obamacare, which he did anyway.</p>
<p>The gist of his message to me is this:  &#8220;I am pleased that this legislation would reform the health care system in a fiscally responsible manner.&#8221;  </p>
<p>&#8220;Fiscally responsible?&#8221;  My blood pressure just keeps going up as I read through this mealy-mouthed attempt to calm down the republicans and independents to whom he sent this form letter.  He has no clue what implementation of this bill is going to do to the economy, or to health care in America, or how it will, in the long term, cause trillions of dollars of deficit spending every year.</p>
<p>He also says: &#8220;Oregonians can always expect me to listen to their concerns and be honest and straightforward with my answers.  I hope you will continue to keep me informed about the issues that matter most to you.&#8221;</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s my reply to Senator Merkley:  &#8220;Great &#8211; I&#8217;ll keep on writing you, Jeff, so that you can just keep right on ignoring me, like you ignored the millions of Americans who showed up in Washington DC to protest against Obamacare last summer. Rest assured that we Oregon voters will take your record into account when voting you out of office when your term is up.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jmblog.com/2010/01/04/senator-jeff-merkley-of-oregon-has-no-clue/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tell the FDA to keep dangerous ECT machines listed as dangerous devices…</title>
		<link>http://www.jmblog.com/2010/01/04/tell-the-fda-to-keep-dangerous-ect-machines-listed-as-dangerous-devices/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jmblog.com/2010/01/04/tell-the-fda-to-keep-dangerous-ect-machines-listed-as-dangerous-devices/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 17:31:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jere Matlock</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Psychiatric Abuse]]></category>

	<!-- AutoMeta Start -->
	<category>machines</category>
	<category>devices</category>
	<category>safety</category>
	<category>safety</category>
	<category>dangerous</category>
	<category>shock</category>
	<category>electro</category>
	<category>class</category>
	<!-- AutoMeta End -->
	
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jmblog.com/?p=387</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The FDA is considering reclassifying ECT machines (Electro Convulsive Therapy or shock machines) as Class 2 devices instead of Class 3 devices (which are dangerous).  This would allow more widespread use of these barbaric instruments by psychiatrists.</p>
<p>Note that ECT Machines have never been tested for &#8220;safety&#8221; &#8212; they can&#8217;t pass any such safety inspections or tests because they cause irrevocable harm to patients who are, for the most part, forcibly administered electro shock.  Sending hundreds of volts of electricity through the brain is not something that should be condoned by the FDA.</p>
<p>Give the FDA a piece of your mind about&#160;&#8230;</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The FDA is considering reclassifying ECT machines (Electro Convulsive Therapy or shock machines) as Class 2 devices instead of Class 3 devices (which are dangerous).  This would allow more widespread use of these barbaric instruments by psychiatrists.</p>
<p>Note that ECT Machines have never been tested for &#8220;safety&#8221; &#8212; they can&#8217;t pass any such safety inspections or tests because they cause irrevocable harm to patients who are, for the most part, forcibly administered electro shock.  Sending hundreds of volts of electricity through the brain is not something that should be condoned by the FDA.</p>
<p>Give the FDA a piece of your mind about it here: <a href="http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/home.html#submitComment?R=0900006480a20202">ECT Machines</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jmblog.com/2010/01/04/tell-the-fda-to-keep-dangerous-ect-machines-listed-as-dangerous-devices/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How to Get Links To Your Site</title>
		<link>http://www.jmblog.com/2009/12/24/how-to-get-links-to-your-site/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jmblog.com/2009/12/24/how-to-get-links-to-your-site/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Dec 2009 04:21:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jere Matlock</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Search Engine Optimization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Design]]></category>

	<!-- AutoMeta Start -->
	<category>outbound</category>
	<category>banned</category>
	<category>links</category>
	<category>updated</category>
	<category>broken</category>
	<category>building</category>
	<category>linktiger</category>
	<category>xpelo</category>
	<!-- AutoMeta End -->
	
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jmblog.com/?p=371</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I routinely check all the outbound links from my site using a program from www.xpelo.com to look for sites I link to that Google has banned, and using www.linktiger.com to find any broken links.  If your site has a ton of broken outbound links, or if you link to a website Google has banned, you can bet that Google will penalize your site.</p>
<p>I found one such banned link today on my site, on a page I hadn&#8217;t updated in a a while; I updated it with all the info I have on how to effectively get links to your site.</p>
<p>The&#160;&#8230;</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I routinely check all the outbound links from my site using a program from www.xpelo.com to look for sites I link to that Google has banned, and using www.linktiger.com to find any broken links.  If your site has a ton of broken outbound links, or if you link to a website Google has banned, you can bet that Google will penalize your site.</p>
<p>I found one such banned link today on my site, on a page I hadn&#8217;t updated in a a while; I updated it with all the info I have on how to effectively get links to your site.</p>
<p>The article is here:  <a href="http://www.wordsinarow.com/how-to-get-links.html" title="link building">How to Get Links To your Site</a></p>
<p>Good luck on using it.  If you have questions about link building, I&#8217;ll be happy to answer them below.</p>
<p>Best,</p>
<p>Jere Matlock</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jmblog.com/2009/12/24/how-to-get-links-to-your-site/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Problems with brand new affiliate sites</title>
		<link>http://www.jmblog.com/2009/11/30/problems-with-brand-new-affiliate-sites/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jmblog.com/2009/11/30/problems-with-brand-new-affiliate-sites/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 21:16:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jere Matlock</dc:creator>
		<br />
<b>Warning</b>:  Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in <b>/home/jmblogc/public_html/wp-content/plugins/autometa/autometa.php</b> on line <b>300</b><br />
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>

	<!-- AutoMeta Start -->
	<!-- AutoMeta End -->
	
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jmblog.com/?p=369</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Michael H asked: </p>
<p>I have recently obtained a domain name.  Under my domain are products sold through Amazon.com sure you are well aware of associate marketing. I guess i need somebody to be honest about forthcoming costs in relation to registering on search engines and how to go about it successfully with minimum cost, maximum effect.  Can you help ?</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-</p>
<p>My reply:  You are in for a long uphill battle if you want to compete against Amazon itself for the sale of the products you are selling as one of their affiliates.</p>
<p>Google doesn&#8217;t like affiliate sites and penalizes them in various&#160;&#8230;</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael H asked: </p>
<p>I have recently obtained a domain name.  Under my domain are products sold through Amazon.com sure you are well aware of associate marketing. I guess i need somebody to be honest about forthcoming costs in relation to registering on search engines and how to go about it successfully with minimum cost, maximum effect.  Can you help ?</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-</p>
<p>My reply:  You are in for a long uphill battle if you want to compete against Amazon itself for the sale of the products you are selling as one of their affiliates.</p>
<p>Google doesn&#8217;t like affiliate sites and penalizes them in various ways.</p>
<p>For example, there are thousands of Amway distributors in the USA, but the organic search results of sites that come up in a search for &#8220;amway&#8221; are pretty focused on corporate amway and anti-amway sites, because of something called &#8220;QDD&#8221; or &#8220;query deserves diversity&#8221;, a rule within the Google algorithm that says for some queries, it&#8217;s better to have a diversity of websites that present different views of that subject.  So instead of a list of Amway distributors, you get all kinds of other stuff.  Same with queries  for &#8220;judaism&#8221;, &#8220;christianity&#8221;, &#8220;amish&#8221;, and so on.  Rather than just present sites that deal positively with those things, you get results from Nazis, apostates, muslims, etc., bashing whatever you&#8217;re looking for at Google.</p>
<p>When you search for the products that you are trying to sell, are there ANY affiliate sites showing up in Google&#8217;s search results?  If so, they will usually be the best optimized and oldest of such sites.  But Google won&#8217;t show new sites in the natural search resulst for anything, for about six to nine months (look up &#8220;Google sandbox&#8221;).</p>
<p>Which means that as a new site you&#8217;ll need to get a ton of links to your site from other relevant sites in order to have any chance of ranking well at Google, and you&#8217;ll have to wait for most of a year to have a chance to come up in the organic search results at Google.</p>
<p>Of course, you can use Google Adwords to get immediate visitors to your site (because they can&#8217;t find you in the organic Google search results you&#8217;ll have to advertise with Google), but then you&#8217;ll be spending money to get traffic to your site with no guarantee that those visitors will buy anything from you.</p>
<p>You&#8217;ll need to spend a lot of time getting links to your site.  And you&#8217;ll need to spend a lot of money on Google AdWords.</p>
<p>So the question becomes &#8211; at what point do you think this project is going to make you money instead of costing you money?</p>
<p>If you create a blog or website that a lot of people visit, you can set up affiliate links to Amazon and sell stuff that you talk about.  But the odds of havnig a new blog that people visit are pretty slim.  Unless you&#8217;re a great or funny writer or very clever in some way and generate some buzz that gets you noticed.  </p>
<p>Are you?</p>
<p>It&#8217;s your call.</p>
<p>Best,</p>
<p>Jeré Matlock</p>
<p>http://www.wordsinarow.com</p>
<p>Website Design &#038; Marketing  / SEO</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jmblog.com/2009/11/30/problems-with-brand-new-affiliate-sites/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Overwhelming evidence that psych drugs cause suicide, murder, mayhem</title>
		<link>http://www.jmblog.com/2009/11/26/overwhelming-evidence-that-psych-drugs-cause-suicide-murder-mayhem/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jmblog.com/2009/11/26/overwhelming-evidence-that-psych-drugs-cause-suicide-murder-mayhem/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 20:01:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jere Matlock</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Big Pharma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Psychiatric Abuse]]></category>

	<!-- AutoMeta Start -->
	<category />
	<!-- AutoMeta End -->
	
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jmblog.com/?p=367</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>This little database of about 1000 stories that have been carried by the media in the last ten years shows the overwhelming evidence of <a href="http://www.ssristories.com/index.php" title="psychiatric drugs cause violence">psych drugs</a> (and trying to withdraw from them) being the CAUSE of extremely violent behavior. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s hard to read down through this summary and not feel outraged.  Here are some random highlights from the long, long list:</p>
<ul>
<li>6 Year Old Dies on Psych Cocktail</li>
<li>7 Year Old In Foster Care Dies From Poweful Antidepressant</li>
<li>10 Year Old Girl Dies in Mother&#8217;s Arms From Toxicity of Antidepressant</li>
<li>11 Year Old Boy is Violent &#038; Suicidal on Paxil</li>
<li>12 Year Old Kills Self: On&#160;&#8230;</li></ul>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This little database of about 1000 stories that have been carried by the media in the last ten years shows the overwhelming evidence of <a href="http://www.ssristories.com/index.php" title="psychiatric drugs cause violence">psych drugs</a> (and trying to withdraw from them) being the CAUSE of extremely violent behavior. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s hard to read down through this summary and not feel outraged.  Here are some random highlights from the long, long list:</p>
<ul>
<li>6 Year Old Dies on Psych Cocktail</li>
<li>7 Year Old In Foster Care Dies From Poweful Antidepressant</li>
<li>10 Year Old Girl Dies in Mother&#8217;s Arms From Toxicity of Antidepressant</li>
<li>11 Year Old Boy is Violent &#038; Suicidal on Paxil</li>
<li>12 Year Old Kills Self: On Both Antidepressants &#038; ADHD Med</li>
<li>14 Year Old Kills his Mother</li>
<li>18 Year Old Kills Girlfriend, Then Self</li>
<li>18 Year Old Imprisoned for Murder of Father Has New Evidence Against Prozac</li>
<li>19 Year Old Kills Two Neighbors in 2005</li>
<li>22 Year Old Tries to Stab Mother &#038; Kill Self</li>
<li>20 Year Old Student Hangs Self: No History of Mental Problems</li>
<li>23 Year Old Man Kills Girlfriend &#038; then Kills Himself</li>
</ul>
<p>Big Pharma leaves a wake behind their markeing of Paxil, Zoloft, and other drugs:  a pandemic of violent behavior (murder, suicide, mayhem) never seen before in this world.</p>
<p>If you&#8217;ve ever wondered why psych drugs are so expensive (some of them have a profit margin of more than 1000% (yes, that means they are selling them for more than a thousand times what they actually cost to make) aside from just making insane amounts of profit, they have to cover their asses from the lawsuits which inevitably follow.  Profits from these drugs are in the billions of dollars annually.</p>
<p>If you&#8217;re thinking of putting someone on psychiatric drugs, check through the list on this database first and see what you can expect to follow.  Which is more likely for a particular drug: homicide, or suicide?</p>
<p>If you are a journalist or blogger or politician, make sure you have done your homework before you forward whatever <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/15/us/politics/15health.html">talking points the drug companies are handing out for members of congress to spout into the congressional record</a>.  (See a good <a href="http://majikthise.typepad.com/majikthise_/2009/11/lawmakers-delivered-talking-points-written-by-drug-company-lobbyists.html">blog post about politicians marching in lockstep with drug companies</a>.  Where do you think the politicians are getting the massive amounts of money needed to finance political campaigns these days?  Senator Wyden from my home state of Oregon used to have an ad from a drug company right on the home page of his main website!)</p>
<p>The violent rampage of those on psych drugs  is not limited to the big cities, either.</p>
<p>In just the last week, there have been three murder suicides in my little rural county in Southern Oregon.  </p>
<ol>
<li>My neighbor&#8217;s adult son killed his only brother with a home-made samurai sword.  So now he&#8217;s in the klink for murder and not likely to ever be released.</li>
<li>A woman was pulled out of a shower, killed, and buried in a shallow grave by her ex-boyfriend, who must have watched a bunch of CSI programs, because he cleaned up after himself really well to make it look like she&#8217;d been abducted.  They didn&#8217;t really have any other suspects: after some effective interrogation he led police to the shallow grave where he&#8217;d buried her.</li>
<li>A man shot his ex-wife in the back, then led police on a chase and finally shot himself dead after playing at suicide-by-cop for a while without getting the cops to go along with it.  We don&#8217;t know yet whether she will live.  Police found her dumped on the street when they responded to the shots a few blocks from the police station &#8212; he stole her car to get away.</li>
</ol>
<p>So where does all this suicidal ideation and homicidal ideation come from?  In large part from the very drugs that the psyhiatrists are prescribing to their patients in lieu of any effective form of treatment.  These symptoms of homicidal and suicidal ideation are a frequent side effect of the drugs psychiatrists use to &#8220;prevent&#8221; violent behavior.  They just make it worse by several orders of magnitude.</p>
<p>So if you&#8217;re a journalist, editor, publisher, or a doctor, educator, or politician thinking about &#8220;mental health parity&#8221; or &#8220;mandatory mental health screenings&#8221; like the &#8220;Mother&#8217;s Act&#8221;, please USE the database I link to above to do your own research into the dangers of psychiatric drugs before you sign on with the drug companies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jmblog.com/2009/11/26/overwhelming-evidence-that-psych-drugs-cause-suicide-murder-mayhem/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Using .htaccess to make search engine-friendly URLs – “There is no spoon”</title>
		<link>http://www.jmblog.com/2009/11/15/using-htaccess-to-make-search-engine-friendly-urls-there-is-no-spoon/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jmblog.com/2009/11/15/using-htaccess-to-make-search-engine-friendly-urls-there-is-no-spoon/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 00:39:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jere Matlock</dc:creator>
		<br />
<b>Warning</b>:  Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in <b>/home/jmblogc/public_html/wp-content/plugins/autometa/autometa.php</b> on line <b>300</b><br />
		<category><![CDATA[Search Engine Optimization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Design]]></category>

	<!-- AutoMeta Start -->
	<!-- AutoMeta End -->
	
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jmblog.com/?p=365</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>User Jan wrote me with the following query about optimizing database driven websites.</p>
<hr />
<p>Hi there,</p>
<p>I have a question about search engine friendly sites in regard to your article here about <a href="http://www.wordsinarow.com/database.html">SEO of Database-driven Websites</a>.  I&#8217;m trying to make a website search engine friendly, using descriptive urls.  Currently every link to a subpage looks like this: www.dom.ain/?visit=cat  </p>
<p>So I only have 1 index file that provides information the user wants. Is there any way to improve this without creating a new php for every page on the site?</p>
<p>I thought about creating a *.htm that will route to the corresponding php url.</p>
<p>E.g. company.htm&#160;&#8230;</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>User Jan wrote me with the following query about optimizing database driven websites.</p>
<hr />
<p>Hi there,</p>
<p>I have a question about search engine friendly sites in regard to your article here about <a href="http://www.wordsinarow.com/database.html">SEO of Database-driven Websites</a>.  I&#8217;m trying to make a website search engine friendly, using descriptive urls.  Currently every link to a subpage looks like this: www.dom.ain/?visit=cat  </p>
<p>So I only have 1 index file that provides information the user wants. Is there any way to improve this without creating a new php for every page on the site?</p>
<p>I thought about creating a *.htm that will route to the corresponding php url.</p>
<p>E.g. company.htm file routes to /?visit=comp</p>
<p> But I gathered that search engines don&#8217;t like links that are opened via Java Script.</p>
<p>Thx for any help, it would be greatly aprechiated.</p>
<p>Kind Regards, Jan </p>
<hr />
<p>I replied:</p>
<p>When we have a website that uses variables in the domain names, we usually<br />
use a system called Mod Rewrite on a Linux/Apache/mySQL/PHP  (LAMP) server<br />
to make more user-friendly URLs.  This doesn&#8217;t work the same a Windows IIS<br />
server, but works well on a LAMP server.  Most websites nowadays are on LAMP<br />
servers.</p>
<p>It works like this:</p>
<p>In the .htaccess file put these lines for each of the pages of the site.<br />
(Contact a web programmer for a quote on doing this if it is beyond your<br />
technical skills &#8212; it should be fairly fast and cheap to get done.)</p>
<p> &#8212;-<br />
RewriteEngine On<br />
RewriteRule ^airport.php /community.php?unit=airport.php&#038;language=english [L]</p>
<p> &#8212;&#8211;<br />
You only need to tell it &#8220;RewriteEngine On&#8221; once.  For every page you want to rewrite like this, you add another line.</p>
<p>So when someone goes to airport.php, what they actually get is the community.php page, with all its variables.  What Google &#8220;sees&#8221; is airport.php.  What a visitor &#8220;sees&#8221; in his browser address bar is airport.php.</p>
<p>What&#8217;s actually displaying to both Google and your visitor is</p>
<p>community.php?unit=airport.php&#038;language=english</p>
<p>This allows you to have a shorter URL that is more search engine friendly.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a better example:</p>
<p>RewriteRule ^big-green-widgets.php /product-display.php?productid=widgets&#038;productstyle=blue&#038;productsize=big[L]</p>
<p>There IS no page named big-green-widgets.php on the server.  (Like Neo learns in The Matrix movie, &#8220;There is no spoon.&#8221;)</p>
<p>The server sees a request for the page &#8220;big-green-widgets.php&#8221; and because of this line in the .htaccess file, the server goes and gets the info it<br />
needs to create the page on-the-fly.</p>
<p>Also, don&#8217;t use JavaScript for your links.  In your navigation menus, link to the names of the pages you set up in the .htacess file, like &#8220;big-green-widgets.php&#8221;.  Even if that actually mod rewrites over to www.dom.ain/?visit=cat1324, it doesn&#8217;t matter.  As far as Google and your visitors are concerned, you have a page called big-green-widgets.php.</p>
<p>Mod rewrite is a wonderful tool for anyone trying to optimize a site that is built using only a single page with variables, or using a long string of variables and a database.</p>
<p>Make sense?</p>
<p>Best,</p>
<p>Jeré Matlock</p>
<p>http://www.wordsinarow.com</p>
<p>Website Design &#038; Marketing  / SEO</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jmblog.com/2009/11/15/using-htaccess-to-make-search-engine-friendly-urls-there-is-no-spoon/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Does My Website Need a Static, Dedicated IP Address?  Really?</title>
		<link>http://www.jmblog.com/2009/11/09/does-my-website-need-a-static-dedicated-ip-address-really/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jmblog.com/2009/11/09/does-my-website-need-a-static-dedicated-ip-address-really/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 01:42:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jere Matlock</dc:creator>
		<br />
<b>Warning</b>:  Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in <b>/home/jmblogc/public_html/wp-content/plugins/autometa/autometa.php</b> on line <b>300</b><br />
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>

	<!-- AutoMeta Start -->
	<!-- AutoMeta End -->
	
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jmblog.com/?p=361</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Chuck of <a href="http://www.stjohn.net/">Chuck St. John Photography</a> asked me the following question by email: </p>
<p>&#8220;I don&#8217;t seem to have a static IP. When I did your test, and used the IP # given, It did not take me to my web page but the to hosting<br />
companies&#8217; web page <img src='http://www.jmblog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':-(' class='wp-smiley' title="Does My Website Need a Static, Dedicated IP Address?  Really?" />  &#8221;</p>
<p>My answer was:</p>
<p>&#8220;Yeah, that happens a lot.  It means your website has a &#8216;dynamic, shared IP address&#8217; which saves the web hosting company a ton of money.&#8221;</p>
<p>Chuck is talking about the process of figuring out whether your website has its own static, dedicated IP address.  The way you can know this is to open&#160;&#8230;</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chuck of <a href="http://www.stjohn.net/">Chuck St. John Photography</a> asked me the following question by email: </p>
<p>&#8220;I don&#8217;t seem to have a static IP. When I did your test, and used the IP # given, It did not take me to my web page but the to hosting<br />
companies&#8217; web page <img src='http://www.jmblog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':-(' class='wp-smiley' title="Does My Website Need a Static, Dedicated IP Address?  Really?" />  &#8221;</p>
<p>My answer was:</p>
<p>&#8220;Yeah, that happens a lot.  It means your website has a &#8216;dynamic, shared IP address&#8217; which saves the web hosting company a ton of money.&#8221;</p>
<p>Chuck is talking about the process of figuring out whether your website has its own static, dedicated IP address.  The way you can know this is to open up a command prompt  (the good old DOS prompt), and typing in the following:</p>
<p>ping www.mywebsite.com<br />
(inserting your real website name there.)</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s try it for this website, www.jmblog.com:</p>
<p>ping www.jmblog.com</p>
<p>The result will be a reply an IP address.</p>
<p>In this case, that IP address is 65.38.173.51.</p>
<p>If you take that IP address and copy it into your browser window, it will return my website, www.jmblog.com.  That means that my site has its own, static, dedicated IP address.  It doesn&#8217;t change.  It&#8217;s been at the same IP address for about 5 or 6 years now.</p>
<p>The following is a gross oversimplification, but it will give you the idea:</p>
<p>I host about 50 clients on my dedicated server.  Each website on my server is set up with a static, dedicated IP address.  It&#8217;s better for search engine rankings.  It helps a litle bit at Google to have a dedicated, static IP address.  (<a href="http://www.bruceclay.com">Bruce Clay</a> has proven this definitely &#8212; and I trust Bruce&#8217;s data above what Google says, which is that it doesn&#8217;t matter.  It does matter.)  That&#8217;s why I offer static IP addresses to my SEO and web design clients when I wind up hosting them.</p>
<p>But it costs me about a dollar per IP address per month.</p>
<p>Most web servers are set up to handle 2000 or more websites.  (Remember, this is a GROSS oversimplification I&#8217;m giving here.)  As I understand it, most of those websites are sitting idle most of the time, with no one visiting them (sad but true).  But when someone does visit them, a normal server will dynamically assign an IP address from a small pool of IP addresses, and so for the duration of the visit (someone looking at the site in his browser) the site is assigned an IP address from the pool.  When that session is over, a visitor to a different website hosted on that server will be given the exact same IP address from the pool. So the IP address is dynamic (happens whenever there&#8217;s a request) and it&#8217;s shared, and its somewhat random.  A server can handle 2000 websites or more, while using less than 100 IP addresses, most of the time.  So that&#8217;s what most web hosting companies do.  (There are lots of exceptions to this, but you get the idea.)</p>
<p>Your website could be sharing IP addresses with known spammers, with porn sites, or with drug or gambling sites, and you&#8217;d never know.  But Google will know.</p>
<p>And since IP addresses are in a dwindling supply (they are talking about implenting a new six-number IP address scheme in the next few years after we  run completely out of IP addresses using four numbers), the cost of them is going up and it&#8217;s hard to get any more.  I can&#8217;t get any more IP addresses from the company where I lease my dedicated server; they won&#8217;t sell them to me because they need them to set up new servers.</p>
<p>However, there&#8217;s usually a back-door kind of way to get an IP address from your current web hosting company.  Just buy a security certificate for your website.  Tell them you&#8217;re going to be setting up a shopping cart and need a secure server and your own security certificate.  When they sell you a  security cert, it has to be assigned to JUST ONE IP address.  So you&#8217;ll end up with a static, dedicated IP address for your website when you buy a security certificate.</p>
<p>Which helps a little bit with your Google ranking.  Not a lot, but some.  </p>
<p>To prove it to yourself, do this little test.  It won&#8217;t take 10 minutes:</p>
<p>Go check the websites ranking in the top 10 at Google for your keywords and see how many of them have their own static, dedicated IP address.  Then go to page 10 of the Google search results for that same keyword and see how many websites have their own static, dedicated IP addresses.  Whenever I&#8217;ve done this, it&#8217;s shown a distinct lack of static IP addresses for those on page 10, and an abundance of static IP addresses on page 1 of the Google SERPs.  </p>
<p>Is it a causal relationship?  Or Coincidence?  Sites that rank well tend to be selling something, which means they have a security cert, which means they have a static, dedicated IP address.  And they tend to be better optimized, more focused, have better content, and so on &#8212; in other words they have been actively driven to the first page of Google search results by someone like me. </p>
<p>Either way, it still relates: sites with a static, dedicated IP address tend to do better in the Google search results.</p>
<p>Is having a dedicated, static IP address as important as having tons of relevant content?  Not even remotely.  It is as important as having tons of links to your site from relevant web pages that also have their own PageRank?  Nope.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s just barely important enough that we make it a requirement for our SEO clients to have a static, dedicated IP address.  And we&#8217;ll help them get one, one way or another.  It&#8217;s usually easy.</p>
<p>If your content is sparse and stale and you have few links to your site, which by the way is built entirely with Flash,  then don&#8217;t sweat the fact that you&#8217;ve got a dynamic IP address.  You&#8217;ve got MUCH bigger problems to worry about.</p>
<p>But if you&#8217;re duking it out on page 1 of the Google search results for your main keyword, and you can&#8217;t seem to make it up past the 4th position, getting your site a static IP address may just boost your site that last little bit to get you to position 3.  There are dozens of minor points, each of which may help.  Having a static IP address is just one of them.</p>
<p>I use a proprietary checklist of about 60 points that we know make a difference to Google, based on our experience doing search engine optimization for more than a decade.  We were doing this back before they were trying to figure out what to call it and eventually settled on &#8220;SEO&#8221; and &#8220;SEM&#8221;.  </p>
<p>Many points of SEO technique have come and gone from that checklist over the years.  Meta keywords tags, invisible text, stuffing keywords in table summary tags, stuffing keywords in comment tags, reciprocal link directories, etc.,  have gone the way of the dinosaurs.</p>
<p>We give away free consultations where we try to give you one concrete thing that you can do to make your site rank better in the Google search results; no one will twist your arm to buy our SEO audit services but if you want to know what your site needs to rank well, feel free to contact me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jmblog.com/2009/11/09/does-my-website-need-a-static-dedicated-ip-address-really/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What’s wrong with psychiatry?  Let a psychiatrist explain….</title>
		<link>http://www.jmblog.com/2009/10/25/whats-wrong-with-psychiatry-let-a-psychiatrist-explain/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jmblog.com/2009/10/25/whats-wrong-with-psychiatry-let-a-psychiatrist-explain/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 23:28:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jere Matlock</dc:creator>
		<br />
<b>Warning</b>:  Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in <b>/home/jmblogc/public_html/wp-content/plugins/autometa/autometa.php</b> on line <b>300</b><br />
		<category><![CDATA[Big Pharma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Psychiatric Abuse]]></category>

	<!-- AutoMeta Start -->
	<!-- AutoMeta End -->
	
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jmblog.com/?p=357</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>This two-minute video from CCHR explains <a href="http://www.cchrint.org/videos/experts/whats-wrong-with-psychiatry-a-psychiatrist-explains/">what&#8217;s wrong with psychiatry</a>.  It&#8217;s from Dr. Niall McLaren, who&#8217;s been a practicing psychiatrist for 22 years, and is the former head of the Dept of Psychiatry at Repatriation Hospital in Australia.</p>
<p>Bluntly, he says that psychiatry is pseudo-science and that all their bunk hangs from one skyhook, &#8220;that mental disorder is brain disorder&#8221;.  And that there is no proof whatever to that premise.</p>
<p>As he says, &#8220;bugger the money&#8221; that&#8217;s being wasted on psychiatry and psych medicine.  It&#8217;s the inability of psychiatry to actually help people, and the actual harm that it does to people,&#160;&#8230;</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This two-minute video from CCHR explains <a href="http://www.cchrint.org/videos/experts/whats-wrong-with-psychiatry-a-psychiatrist-explains/">what&#8217;s wrong with psychiatry</a>.  It&#8217;s from Dr. Niall McLaren, who&#8217;s been a practicing psychiatrist for 22 years, and is the former head of the Dept of Psychiatry at Repatriation Hospital in Australia.</p>
<p>Bluntly, he says that psychiatry is pseudo-science and that all their bunk hangs from one skyhook, &#8220;that mental disorder is brain disorder&#8221;.  And that there is no proof whatever to that premise.</p>
<p>As he says, &#8220;bugger the money&#8221; that&#8217;s being wasted on psychiatry and psych medicine.  It&#8217;s the inability of psychiatry to actually help people, and the actual harm that it does to people, that is at issue.</p>
<p>Psychiatry is to medicine as astrology is to astronomy.  A system of beliefs based on observation and tradition &#8212; and not much more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jmblog.com/2009/10/25/whats-wrong-with-psychiatry-let-a-psychiatrist-explain/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
