<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">

<channel>
	<title>Gravy834.com</title>
	
	<link>http://www.gravy834.com</link>
	<description>SEO God in the making!</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 18:30:58 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/gravy834" /><feedburner:info uri="gravy834" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><feedburner:emailServiceId>gravy834</feedburner:emailServiceId><feedburner:feedburnerHostname>http://feedburner.google.com</feedburner:feedburnerHostname><item>
		<title>Are you losing search engine rankings due to 404 errors?</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/gravy834/~3/WEwq054APuY/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gravy834.com/2009/03/25/are-you-losing-search-engine-rankings-due-to-404-errors/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 18:30:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>gravy834</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Google SERP's]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gravy834.com/?p=203</guid>
		<description>A few weeks ago a friend came to me wondering why his search engine positions had suddenly dropped from 3 to 182 for his main keyword.
Well it turns out he had restructured his site, changing from static pages to a dynamic WordPress site. The title tags, and content remained the same and the new pages [...]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/gravy834/~4/WEwq054APuY" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gravy834.com/2009/03/25/are-you-losing-search-engine-rankings-due-to-404-errors/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.gravy834.com/2009/03/25/are-you-losing-search-engine-rankings-due-to-404-errors/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Adwords - Ad Title Character Limit 25 or 28???</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/gravy834/~3/8GxnIQeu4qo/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gravy834.com/2009/02/18/google-adwords-adtitle-character-limit-25-or-28/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 12:51:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>gravy834</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Google AdWords]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[adwords]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[seomoz]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[title]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[trickster]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gravy834.com/?p=187</guid>
		<description>Trickster&amp;#8217;s recent SEOmoz post outlines how Google are allowing ads to have a title that&amp;#8217;s longer than the 25 character limit. Surely this can&amp;#8217;t be true!
I thought I&amp;#8217;d test it out for myself here in the UK.
I stuck to Trickster&amp;#8217;s 28 character example of [oklahoma medical malpractice] (exact match) and used the keyword insert function, [...]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/gravy834/~4/8GxnIQeu4qo" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gravy834.com/2009/02/18/google-adwords-adtitle-character-limit-25-or-28/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.gravy834.com/2009/02/18/google-adwords-adtitle-character-limit-25-or-28/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Bye Bye duplicate content, Canonical URLs to the rescue!</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/gravy834/~3/OKOhDaUoZlc/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gravy834.com/2009/02/17/bye-bye-duplicate-content-canonical-urls-to-the-rescue/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 14:40:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>gravy834</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Ecommerce]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Online Retail]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[canonical]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[msn]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[url]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[yahoo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gravy834.com/?p=152</guid>
		<description>Well it&amp;#8217;s not strictly true, duplicate content will still be an issue for a lot of sites!
Anyway, last week at SMX West, Google, Yahoo and MSN announced that they now accept the rel=&amp;#8221;canonical&amp;#8221; variable.

What does this mean?
Let&amp;#8217;s take a look at Majestic Wine. Their site uses a large database which displays wines based on your [...]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/gravy834/~4/OKOhDaUoZlc" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gravy834.com/2009/02/17/bye-bye-duplicate-content-canonical-urls-to-the-rescue/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.gravy834.com/2009/02/17/bye-bye-duplicate-content-canonical-urls-to-the-rescue/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Announcing the Arrival of the “Top 834 Tips On:” Series</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/gravy834/~3/SufADs5iPbw/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gravy834.com/2009/02/06/top-834-tips-announced/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 14:34:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>gravy834</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Top 834 Tips]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[834]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[tips]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gravy834.com/?p=56</guid>
		<description>Over the coming months I&amp;#8217;ll be posting some top tips, do&amp;#8217;s and don&amp;#8217;ts and best practice guides on various topics for the online community. These will range from E-commerce to Blogging, PPC to Twitter and so on. In fact I&amp;#8217;ll even take requests.
All in all there&amp;#8217;ll be a total of 834 tips (do you see [...]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/gravy834/~4/SufADs5iPbw" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gravy834.com/2009/02/06/top-834-tips-announced/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.gravy834.com/2009/02/06/top-834-tips-announced/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Cadbury’s Eyebrows Advert - Is it enough?</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/gravy834/~3/o5LI2CcffI8/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gravy834.com/2009/01/29/cadburys-eybrows-advert-is-it-enough/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 14:09:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>gravy834</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Branding]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[advert]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[cadburys]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[eyebrows]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[tv]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gravy834.com/?p=42</guid>
		<description>So here&amp;#8217;s a great ad from a great brand;

But are these latest adverts good enough to put Cadbury&amp;#8217;s up there with the truly iconic brands, like Nike, Levi&amp;#8217;s, Guinness and Sony Playstation?
Each have had amazing TV ads that get talked about and help increase brand awareness, but each ad was somehow related to the actual [...]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/gravy834/~4/o5LI2CcffI8" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gravy834.com/2009/01/29/cadburys-eybrows-advert-is-it-enough/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.gravy834.com/2009/01/29/cadburys-eybrows-advert-is-it-enough/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>UK VAT Reduced Rates - Retailers, you could be losing out!</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/gravy834/~3/JOldC-sREkU/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gravy834.com/2009/01/07/uk-vat-reduced-rates-retailers-you-could-be-losing-out/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 12:17:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>gravy834</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Ecommerce]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Online Retail]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[reduction]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[shopping]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[vat]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gravy834.com/?p=27</guid>
		<description>Most people are now aware that here in the UK the VAT rates were reduced in December from 17.5% to 15% in 2008 to help consumers combat the credit crunch. However as a retailer you could be losing out on thousands of pounds in lost revenue this year if you&amp;#8217;ve incorrectly set-up the reduction on [...]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/gravy834/~4/JOldC-sREkU" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gravy834.com/2009/01/07/uk-vat-reduced-rates-retailers-you-could-be-losing-out/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.gravy834.com/2009/01/07/uk-vat-reduced-rates-retailers-you-could-be-losing-out/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Festive Google Listings</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/gravy834/~3/6ldDXuXWy6w/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gravy834.com/2008/12/16/festive-google-listings/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 13:25:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>gravy834</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Google SERP's]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gravy834.com/?p=23</guid>
		<description>In preparation for the company Christmas karaoke party, I was researching which festive songs I should entertain my collegaues with on Google when all of a sudden I spotted a change to the Google listings.
As you can see, the normal vertical line used to seperate the Google sponsored links has been replaced with a line [...]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/gravy834/~4/6ldDXuXWy6w" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gravy834.com/2008/12/16/festive-google-listings/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.gravy834.com/2008/12/16/festive-google-listings/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Free Google AdWords Clicks!</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/gravy834/~3/AFOUzQ0A29Q/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gravy834.com/2008/12/09/free-google-adwords-clicks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 19:19:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>gravy834</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Google AdWords]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[adwords]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[clicks]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[dire straits]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[free]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gravy834.com/?p=5</guid>
		<description>Yes people you heard me,  Google are literally giving you money for nothing and your clicks for free (do you like what I did there - Dire Straits).
Ever clicked on the &amp;#8216;More Sponsored Links&amp;#8217; link at the bottom of a SERP&amp;#8217;s page underneath the other sponsored ads? Well it turns out that the ads featured [...]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/gravy834/~4/AFOUzQ0A29Q" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gravy834.com/2008/12/09/free-google-adwords-clicks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.gravy834.com/2008/12/09/free-google-adwords-clicks/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Day 1… The first steps into something I guess???</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/gravy834/~3/Pe6Ct8VHidA/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gravy834.com/2008/12/09/day-1-the-first-steps-into-something-i-guess/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 18:50:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>gravy834</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Random]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[gravy834]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gravy834.com/?p=3</guid>
		<description>So here it is, that novel opening post where everyone always writes about how this is their first ever post and how excited they are and that they can&amp;#8217;t wait to write more etc&amp;#8230;
Well this is certainly no exception! This is my first post, I am excited, and I can&amp;#8217;t wait to write more for [...]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/gravy834/~4/Pe6Ct8VHidA" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gravy834.com/2008/12/09/day-1-the-first-steps-into-something-i-guess/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.gravy834.com/2008/12/09/day-1-the-first-steps-into-something-i-guess/</feedburner:origLink></item>
	</channel>
</rss>
