<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">

<channel>
	<title>Undercover Economist</title>
	
	<link>http://blogs.ft.com/undercover</link>
	<description>This blog has been archived</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Nov 2010 10:27:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
		<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/ft/undercover" /><feedburner:info uri="ft/undercover" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><feedburner:browserFriendly></feedburner:browserFriendly><item>
		<title>Moving on</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ft.com/undercover/2010/11/moving-on/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.ft.com/undercover/2010/11/moving-on/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Nov 2010 10:27:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tim Harford</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Dear Economist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Everyday economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Undercover Economist]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ft.com/undercover/?p=5621</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>You may have noticed that this blog has gone rather quiet while I work on my next book &#8211; sorry. The FT is going to mothball it, which seems reasonable.</p> <p>So &#8211; thanks for following so far. If you&#8217;d like to keep going, here&#8217;s what to do:</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.ft.com/undercover/2010/11/moving-on/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tuesday archive : If the price is right</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ft.com/undercover/2010/11/tuesday-archive-if-the-price-is-right/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.ft.com/undercover/2010/11/tuesday-archive-if-the-price-is-right/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Nov 2010 23:01:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tim Harford</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Everyday economics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ft.com/undercover/?p=5481</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>From 8th July, 2006.</p> <p>If you want to be rich, you can try to set up a brilliantly successful company. Or you can steal money. Trans-parency International, the corruption watchdog, has estimated that Mohamed Suharto embezzled up to $35bn when he was Indonesia’s president, a figure that is in the same league as the entrepreneurial fortunes of Bill Gates and Warren Buffett. On a humbler scale, we all face the same choice. We can try to earn money by doing something useful, or we can try to steal or extort it from other people. A society where most people are doing something useful has a good chance of being rich; a society full of corruption will be poor.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.ft.com/undercover/2010/11/tuesday-archive-if-the-price-is-right/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Where you can find me</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ft.com/undercover/2010/11/where-you-can-find-me/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.ft.com/undercover/2010/11/where-you-can-find-me/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Nov 2010 13:02:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tim Harford</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Everyday economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Undercover Economist]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ft.com/undercover/?p=5611</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>You may have noticed that this blog has gone rather quiet while I work on my next book &#8211; sorry. The FT is going to mothball it, which seems reasonable.</p> <p>So &#8211; thanks for following so far. If you&#8217;d like to keep going, here&#8217;s what to do:</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.ft.com/undercover/2010/11/where-you-can-find-me/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Undercover Economist: A sense of fair play does pay</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ft.com/undercover/2010/11/undercover-economist-a-sense-of-fair-play-does-pay/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.ft.com/undercover/2010/11/undercover-economist-a-sense-of-fair-play-does-pay/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Nov 2010 02:07:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tim Harford</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Undercover Economist]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ft.com/undercover/?p=5591</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I recently had the dubious pleasure of having to deal with someone who is successful and indeed popular, and yet a stubborn, selfish bully when he thinks nobody is looking. It moved me to speculate on an old question: do nice guys finish first, or last? </p> <p><span><em>The remainder of the article</em> <a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/2/33f5408a-e6e4-11df-8894-00144feab49a.html#axzz14SoCGLRH">can be read here</a><em>.     Please post comments  below.</em></span></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.ft.com/undercover/2010/11/undercover-economist-a-sense-of-fair-play-does-pay/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tuesday archive : Schoolboy error</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ft.com/undercover/2010/11/tuesday-archive-schoolboy-error/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.ft.com/undercover/2010/11/tuesday-archive-schoolboy-error/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Nov 2010 23:01:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tim Harford</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Everyday economics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ft.com/undercover/?p=5471</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>From 15th July, 2006.</p> <p>These days schools are trying to outlaw the unhealthy options, but some markets are irrepressible. William Guntrip is a 13-year-old boy whose Northamptonshire school banished vending machines and tuck shop food in favour of nutritious offerings at the canteen. Guntrip spotted a market opportunity and has been buying soft drinks and sweets and reselling them in his school playground. The school is trying to stop him and claims that most students are happy with the new regime, although if that was true then Guntrip wouldn’t be making £50 a day.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.ft.com/undercover/2010/11/tuesday-archive-schoolboy-error/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Undercover Economist: Stimulating debate</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ft.com/undercover/2010/10/undercover-economist-stimulating-debate/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.ft.com/undercover/2010/10/undercover-economist-stimulating-debate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Oct 2010 01:27:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gino de la Paz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Undercover Economist]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ft.com/undercover/?p=5581</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Should the government hire people to bury banknotes down disused mine  shafts, thus stimulating the private sector to dig them up again? Keynes  argued that there were circumstances in which even government spending  as wasteful as this could be economically worthwhile, and ever since he  did, people have been tying themselves in knots about how fiscal  stimulus actually works.</p> <p><span><em>The remainder of the article</em> <a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/2/d3ebb9c4-e168-11df-90b7-00144feabdc0.html" target="_blank">can be read here</a><em>.     Please post comments below.</em></span></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.ft.com/undercover/2010/10/undercover-economist-stimulating-debate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tuesday archive: Keep them guessing</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ft.com/undercover/2010/10/tuesday-archive-keep-them-guessing/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.ft.com/undercover/2010/10/tuesday-archive-keep-them-guessing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Oct 2010 23:10:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tim Harford</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Everyday economics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ft.com/undercover/?p=5251</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>From 17th June, 2006:</p> <p>Penalties pit the goalkeeper against a lone striker in a mentally demanding contest. Once the penalty-taker strikes the ball, it takes 0.3 seconds to hit the back of the net – unless the goalkeeper can somehow get his body in the way. That is simply not enough time for the keeper to pick out the trajectory of the ball and intercept it. He must guess where the striker will shoot and move just as the ball is being struck. If Lehmann had not guessed correctly, he wouldn’t have been a hero.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.ft.com/undercover/2010/10/tuesday-archive-keep-them-guessing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Undercover Economist: Happiness rethink</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ft.com/undercover/2010/10/undercover-economist-happiness-rethink/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.ft.com/undercover/2010/10/undercover-economist-happiness-rethink/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Oct 2010 23:33:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tim Harford</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Undercover Economist]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ft.com/undercover/?p=5461</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>For many years the received wisdom in economics has been much the same  as that in Buddhism: money doesn’t make you happy (see, for instance, “<a class="bodystrong" title="FT - The seven secrets of a happy life" href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/2/9a4d4a64-b0b9-11df-8c04-00144feabdc0.html">The  Seven Secrets of a Happy Life</a>”, FT Weekend Magazine, August 28/29).</p> <p><span><em>The remainder of the article</em> <a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/2/905132a6-dbec-11df-af09-00144feabdc0.html"><span style="color: #4781aa">can be read  here</span></a><em>.    Please post comments below.</em></span></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.ft.com/undercover/2010/10/undercover-economist-happiness-rethink/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tuesday archive: The flight of the humble pea</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ft.com/undercover/2010/10/tuesday-archive-the-flight-of-the-humble-pea/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.ft.com/undercover/2010/10/tuesday-archive-the-flight-of-the-humble-pea/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Oct 2010 23:10:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tim Harford</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Everyday economics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ft.com/undercover/?p=5241</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>From 10th June, 2006:</p> <p>I am becoming a dab hand at turnip soup now that Family Harford eschews supermarket mange-tout in favour of a weekly organic box. I have to confess that I miss the marvellous mange-tout, bursting with freshness and rushed to me straight from Nairobi in a battered old 747.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.ft.com/undercover/2010/10/tuesday-archive-the-flight-of-the-humble-pea/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Undercover Economist: Attested development</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ft.com/undercover/2010/10/undercover-economist-attested-development/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.ft.com/undercover/2010/10/undercover-economist-attested-development/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Oct 2010 23:27:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tim Harford</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Undercover Economist]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ft.com/undercover/?p=5451</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The moral case for doing more to help the very poor is unanswerable. The practical case is more problematic: much foreign aid has been spent poorly in the past and we still have plenty to learn.</p> <p><span><em>The remainder of the article</em> <a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/2/692bb448-d66b-11df-81f0-00144feabdc0.html"><span style="color: #4781aa">can be read  here</span></a><em>.   Please post comments below.</em></span></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.ft.com/undercover/2010/10/undercover-economist-attested-development/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

