<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Economists' Forum</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.ft.com/economistsforum/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.ft.com/economistsforum</link>
	<description>Leading economists discuss issues raised by Martin Wolf and others</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 01:41:04 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>Time for a debate on immigration</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ft.com/economistsforum/2009/11/time-for-a-debate-on-immigration/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.ft.com/economistsforum/2009/11/time-for-a-debate-on-immigration/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 01:38:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Martin Wolf</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ft.com/economistsforum/?p=4196</guid>
					<description><![CDATA[Alan Johnson, home secretary, has recently admitted that the government has been “maladroit” in its handling of immigration. This is British understatement. It has been dishonest: it has pursued a radical policy, with profound consequences, on weak grounds, without serious debate. That is why the British National party is on BBC television. 
The government has [...]]]></description>
				<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.ft.com/economistsforum/2009/11/time-for-a-debate-on-immigration/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
						</item>
				<item>
		<title>Further reading: Evolving economies, governments&#8217; role in crisis and &#8216;too big to fail&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ft.com/economistsforum/2009/11/further-reading-evolving-economies-governments-role-in-crisis-and-too-big-to-fail/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.ft.com/economistsforum/2009/11/further-reading-evolving-economies-governments-role-in-crisis-and-too-big-to-fail/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 12:10:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>FT</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Further reading]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ft.com/economistsforum/?p=4181</guid>
					<description><![CDATA[From the FT:
Inequity injection - Editorial 
Chaotic evolution defines the market economy - John Kay
Lending must support the real economy - Dirk Bezemer
From elsewhere:
What Would Have Happened If World Governments Had Washed Their Hands of the Financial Crisis? - Brad DeLong
&#8216;Tax cuts and recoveries&#8217; - Mark Thoma, Economists&#8217; View
The roots of the coming crash - [...]]]></description>
				<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.ft.com/economistsforum/2009/11/further-reading-evolving-economies-governments-role-in-crisis-and-too-big-to-fail/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
						</item>
				<item>
		<title>Private behaviour will shape our path to fiscal stability</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ft.com/economistsforum/2009/11/private-behaviour-will-shape-our-path-to-fiscal-stability/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.ft.com/economistsforum/2009/11/private-behaviour-will-shape-our-path-to-fiscal-stability/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 00:53:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Martin Wolf</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Credit squeeze]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Fiscal policy]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ft.com/economistsforum/?p=4131</guid>
					<description><![CDATA[
If we are to understand where we are, we must understand where we have
been. This is particularly true if we are to escape from the huge
fiscal deficits being run by many governments. These deficits are not
the result of government stupidity; they are mainly a consequence of –
and response to – private behaviour. We must not [...]]]></description>
				<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.ft.com/economistsforum/2009/11/private-behaviour-will-shape-our-path-to-fiscal-stability/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
						</item>
				<item>
		<title>Further reading: Roubini, capitalism and the puzzle of Asia</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ft.com/economistsforum/2009/11/further-reading-roubini-capitalism-and-the-puzzle-of-asia/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.ft.com/economistsforum/2009/11/further-reading-roubini-capitalism-and-the-puzzle-of-asia/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 15:06:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>FT</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Further reading]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ft.com/economistsforum/?p=4091</guid>
					<description><![CDATA[From the FT:
Mother of all carry trades faces an inevitable bust - Nouriel Roubini
A fruitless clash of economic opposites - Edmund Phelps
Tame the markets to make capitalism ethical - Ken Costa
We must not be too late with starting the Big Exit - Wolfgang Münchau
Capital controls - Krishna Guha, FT Money Supply
From elsewhere:
How to live in [...]]]></description>
				<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.ft.com/economistsforum/2009/11/further-reading-roubini-capitalism-and-the-puzzle-of-asia/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
						</item>
				<item>
		<title>Further reading: The renminbi, Switzerland, inflation, fiscal stimulus</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ft.com/economistsforum/2009/10/further-reading-the-renminbi-switzerland-inflation-fiscal-stimulus-and-monkeys/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.ft.com/economistsforum/2009/10/further-reading-the-renminbi-switzerland-inflation-fiscal-stimulus-and-monkeys/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 12:50:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>FT</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Further reading]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ft.com/economistsforum/?p=4031</guid>
					<description><![CDATA[From the FT:
Why the renminbi has to rise to address imbalances - Martin Feldstein
Close the funding gap for smaller businesses - Nigel Rudd
King’s proposal provides stability in banking sector - Nigel Collin
Goodbye to the pre-crisis trend line - Samuel Brittan
From elsewhere:
Selling stocks short: Ever controversial - Gerald P. Dwyer, Federal Reserve of Atlanta
Swiss Banking Is [...]]]></description>
				<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.ft.com/economistsforum/2009/10/further-reading-the-renminbi-switzerland-inflation-fiscal-stimulus-and-monkeys/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
						</item>
				<item>
		<title>Further reading: Capital controls, global imbalances, China, Turkey, Goldman</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ft.com/economistsforum/2009/10/further-reading-capital-controls-global-imbalances-china-turkey-goldman/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.ft.com/economistsforum/2009/10/further-reading-capital-controls-global-imbalances-china-turkey-goldman/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 13:33:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>FT</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Further reading]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ft.com/economistsforum/?p=3986</guid>
					<description><![CDATA[From the FT:
How to avoid a repeat of the Great Crash - Peter Clarke
Goldman: reasons to be wrathful - Chris Gradel
A three-way split is the most logical - John Gapper on &#8216;too big to fail&#8217;
Russia’s unsustainable energy model - David Clark
From elsewhere:
A Balanced Global Diet - Nouriel Roubini, RGE Monitor
Chinese railways and speculating pig farmers [...]]]></description>
				<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.ft.com/economistsforum/2009/10/further-reading-capital-controls-global-imbalances-china-turkey-goldman/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
						</item>
				<item>
		<title>Raise interest rates to increase lending</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ft.com/economistsforum/2009/10/raise-interest-rates-to-increase-lending/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.ft.com/economistsforum/2009/10/raise-interest-rates-to-increase-lending/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 06:00:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>FT</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Reserve]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Keynesianism]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Recession]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ft.com/economistsforum/?p=3346</guid>
					<description><![CDATA[By Ronald McKinnon
This is an updated version of Liquidity traps and the credit crunch, published in this forum on August 13, 2009
Since the onset of the credit crunch and global downturn, governments everywhere have responded to the shortfall in aggregate demand in a textbook Keynesian fashion. They have adopted fiscal stimuli: ramping up government expenditures [...]]]></description>
				<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.ft.com/economistsforum/2009/10/raise-interest-rates-to-increase-lending/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
						</item>
				<item>
		<title>Narrow banking is not the answer to systemic fragility</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ft.com/economistsforum/2009/10/narrow-banking-is-not-the-answer-to-systemic-fragility/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.ft.com/economistsforum/2009/10/narrow-banking-is-not-the-answer-to-systemic-fragility/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 18:02:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>FT</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Banks]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Capitalism]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Economists]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Government guarantees]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Charles Goodhart]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[John Kay]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Too big to fail]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ft.com/economistsforum/?p=3931</guid>
					<description><![CDATA[This post, in the Financial Times' Economists' Forum, argues that narrow banking is not the answer to systemic fragility.]]></description>
				<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.ft.com/economistsforum/2009/10/narrow-banking-is-not-the-answer-to-systemic-fragility/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
						</item>
				<item>
		<title>Further reading: &#8216;Too big to fail&#8217;, executive pay, stimulus</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ft.com/economistsforum/2009/10/further-reading-too-big-to-fail-executive-pay-stimulus/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.ft.com/economistsforum/2009/10/further-reading-too-big-to-fail-executive-pay-stimulus/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 15:30:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>FT</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Further reading]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ft.com/economistsforum/?p=3881</guid>
					<description><![CDATA[From the FT:
‘Too big to fail’ is too dumb an idea to keep - John Kay
Obama’s executive pay move is bad policy - Charles Calomiris
Speculators do drive prices, and it’s the developing countries that suffer - Andrew Mold
From elsewhere: 
The Case for More Stimulus - New York Times editorial
Enablers of the Housing Bubble - Brad [...]]]></description>
				<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.ft.com/economistsforum/2009/10/further-reading-too-big-to-fail-executive-pay-stimulus/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
						</item>
				<item>
		<title>How mistaken ideas helped to bring the economy down</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ft.com/economistsforum/2009/10/how-mistaken-ideas-helped-to-bring-the-economy-down/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.ft.com/economistsforum/2009/10/how-mistaken-ideas-helped-to-bring-the-economy-down/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 00:41:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Martin Wolf</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Banks]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Fiscal policy]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ft.com/economistsforum/?p=3866</guid>
					<description><![CDATA[
How did the world economy fall into such a deep hole? It is recovering, but painfully, and after a deep recession, despite unprecedented monetary and fiscal easing. Moreover, how likely is it that a balanced world economy will emerge from this force-feeding? The very fact that such drastic action has been necessary is terrifying. The [...]]]></description>
				<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.ft.com/economistsforum/2009/10/how-mistaken-ideas-helped-to-bring-the-economy-down/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
						</item>
			</channel>
</rss>
