<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">

<channel>
	<title>Journalistical</title>
	
	<link>http://www.journalistical.com</link>
	<description />
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 01:59:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0-RC3</generator>
		<feedburner:info uri="journalistical" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/feedburner/gnqf" /><feedburner:info uri="feedburner/gnqf" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><item>
		<title>Watching: Fox News Writes a Headline for an AP Story</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/feedburner/gnqf/~3/mGac3MQEOQ4/</link>
		<comments>http://www.journalistical.com/?p=169#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 01:59:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[This is Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Associated Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[editorializing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Headlines]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.journalistical.com/?p=169</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[  A classic example of headline editoralizing can be found from Fox News today. In a story about the Senate passing the $410 billion bill, Fox News made no attempt to hide which way it fell on the issue. The original headline, as you can see to the right, was: Senate Passes Huge Spending Bill for Obama  [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h6>
<div style="text-align: left;"><strong> </strong></div>
</h6>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-196" title="foxnews1" src="http://www.journalistical.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/foxnews1.jpg" alt="foxnews1" width="335" height="276" /></p>
<h6>A classic example of headline editoralizing can be found from Fox News today.</h6>
<p>In a story about the Senate <a href="http://www.time.com/time/politics/article/0,8599,1884189,00.html">passing the $410 billion bill</a>, Fox News made no attempt to hide which way it fell on the issue.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.journalistical.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/foxnews.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-171 alignright" title="foxnews" src="http://www.journalistical.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/foxnews-300x158.jpg" alt="foxnews" width="240" height="126" /></a></p>
<p>The original headline, as you can see to the right, was:</p>
<h5>Senate Passes Huge Spending Bill for Obama <br />
 </h5>
<p>and this bit, which looks like it may have been pasted from a pre-vote story:</p>
<blockquote><p>The Senate was scheduled to vote Tuesday and send the $140 billion bill chock full of lawmakers&#8217; pet projects and significant increases in food aid for the poor, energy research and other programs to President Obama.</p></blockquote>
<p>To the network&#8217;s credit, it <a href="http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/03/10/senate-ready-clear-huge-spending-obama/" target="_blank">updated the headline</a>, rather quickly, to something resembling objectivity:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.journalistical.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/fox-news2.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-170  alignright" title="fox-news2" src="http://www.journalistical.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/fox-news2-300x163.jpg" alt="fox-news2" width="240" height="126" /></a></p>
<h5> Senate Passes Huge Spending Bill,</h5>
<h5> Heads to Obama for Signature</h5>
<p>And the new subheading reads:</p>
<blockquote><p>The Senate approved the measure by voice after it cleared a key procedural hurdle by a 62-35 vote.</p>
<p>Sixty votes were required to shut down debate.</p></blockquote>
<p>As the24-hour news networks and online operations continue to rush to publish (or in this case, republish), I can only suspect more bias will creep into headlines, but will then be&#8230; <span style="text-decoration: line-through;">edited out</span>.</p>

<p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/m2S3OY4Md_n9HBGD45tcFkzm66s/0/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/m2S3OY4Md_n9HBGD45tcFkzm66s/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a><br/>
<a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/m2S3OY4Md_n9HBGD45tcFkzm66s/1/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/m2S3OY4Md_n9HBGD45tcFkzm66s/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a></p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/feedburner/gnqf/~4/mGac3MQEOQ4" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.journalistical.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=169</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.journalistical.com/?p=169</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Newspapers Find Bright Spot in Advertising with Yahoo! Partnership</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/feedburner/gnqf/~3/KxTOUZJIJW0/</link>
		<comments>http://www.journalistical.com/?p=126#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 11:00:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Knoxville News Sentinel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NYT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.journalistical.com/?p=126</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The New York Times has an interesting story on how The Knoxville News Sentinel, and other papers, have teamed up with Yahoo! (YHOO) to sell ads in print and online and how the partnership worked &#8211; really well. In a two-week trial of the system, Terry Widener said revenues were &#8220;about a seventh of the amount she typically sells in an [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>The New York Times </em>has an <a title="Yahoo Teams With Newspapers to Sell Ads" href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/28/technology/internet/28yahoo.html" target="_blank">interesting</a><img class="alignright size-thumbnail wp-image-125" title="Yahoo-Newspaper" src="http://www.journalistical.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/newspaper-150x150.jpg" alt="Yahoo-Newspaper" width="150" height="150" /><a title="Yahoo Teams With Newspapers to Sell Ads" href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/28/technology/internet/28yahoo.html" target="_blank"> story</a> on how <em>The Knoxville News Sentine</em><em>l, </em>and other papers, have teamed up with Yahoo! <a href="http://sanebull.com/m?symbol=YHOO">(YHOO)</a> to sell ads in print and online and how the partnership worked &#8211; <em>really well. </em>In a two-week trial of the system, Terry Widener said revenues were &#8220;about a <span style="font-style: normal;">seventh of the amount she typically sells in an entire year.&#8221;</span></p>
<p>The partnership has two distinct advantages.</p>
<p>First, local advertisers can target users based on their browsing history, which helps decide which ads are relevant to the reader.</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;One is a new ad system from Yahoo, currently installed at about 100 newspapers, that allows them to sell graphical ads on their sites that are aimed at specific audiences, like car buyers or sports enthusiasts. The system puts users into those groups based on the pages they visit online, a technique known as behavioral targeting.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>The other advantage of the partnership is the ability to advertise products and businesses on a local level.</p>
<blockquote><p><em><span style="font-style: normal;">&#8220;Between its print and online editions, </span><span style="font-style: normal;">The Ventura County Star</span><span style="font-style: normal;">, for example, reached about 56 percent of its local audience. With the addition of the Yahoo pages, it now reaches 85 percent of Ventura residents, and it can also tell advertisers that they can reach Yahoo’s audience in the larger Los Angeles market.&#8221;</span></em></p></blockquote>
<p><em><span style="font-style: normal;">This is just a small piece of good news for the newspaper business, but it shows there are still successful solutions to be found by those willing to find them.</span></em></p>

<p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/AT2C1VXc9iu-RA0gXipf4CreyL4/0/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/AT2C1VXc9iu-RA0gXipf4CreyL4/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a><br/>
<a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/AT2C1VXc9iu-RA0gXipf4CreyL4/1/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/AT2C1VXc9iu-RA0gXipf4CreyL4/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a></p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/feedburner/gnqf/~4/KxTOUZJIJW0" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.journalistical.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=126</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.journalistical.com/?p=126</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Three Useful Tools For Twitter</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/feedburner/gnqf/~3/SOZndDYqb00/</link>
		<comments>http://www.journalistical.com/?p=76#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 00:54:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tools]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TweetDeck]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TweetGrid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twhirl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Useful]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.journalistical.com/?p=76</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For journalists new to Twitter or just a casual user who hasn&#8217;t ventured away from Twitter.com, these three tools can really help those in journalism (or anybody) manage their ever-growing &#8220;following&#8221; list. TweetDeck TweetDeck is your best choice if you follow many people or feel like you cannot seem to keep up with the constant [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For journalists new to Twitter or just a casual user who hasn&#8217;t ventured away from Twitter.com, these three tools can really help those in journalism (or anybody) manage their ever-growing &#8220;following&#8221; list.</p>
<h2>TweetDeck</h2>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.journalistical.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/tweetdeck-screenshot.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-80" title="tweetdeck-screenshot" src="http://www.journalistical.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/tweetdeck-screenshot-150x150.jpg" alt="tweetdeck-screenshot" width="150" height="150" /></a><span style="font-weight: normal;"><a title="TweetDeck" href="http://www.tweetdeck.com/" target="_blank">TweetDeck</a></span></strong> is your best choice if you follow many people or feel like you cannot seem to keep up with the constant flow. You can have up to ten columns to customize with options, such as: All Friends, Groups, Custom Searches and TwitScoop.</p>
<p><em>Caution</em>: If you do use more than four (or five with the narrow option checked) columns, it can be somewhat annoying scrolling back-and-forth.</p>
<p>To anybody who may use multiple monitors, I would <em>definitely</em> recommend trying TweetDeck in full-screen on the additional screen.</p>
<p>TweetDeck may be light on features, but does a great job at its main objective: splitting your Twitter feed into something much easier to follow.</p>
<h2>Twhirl</h2>
<p><a href="http://www.journalistical.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/twhirl-screenshot.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-78" title="twhirl-screenshot" src="http://www.journalistical.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/twhirl-screenshot-150x150.jpg" alt="twhirl-screenshot" width="150" height="150" /></a>If you want something a little more simple, try <a title="Twhirl" href="http://www.twhirl.org/" target="_blank">Twhirl</a>. </p>
<p><strong>Features include</strong>:</p>
<p> - Notification windows (one of my favorite features)</p>
<p> - Spell checking</p>
<p> - Ability to post pictures to <a title="TwitPic" href="http://twitpic.com/" target="_blank">TwitPic</a></p>
<p> - Multiple ways to shorten URLs</p>
<p> - <a title="Ping.fm" href="http://ping.fm/" target="_blank">Ping.fm</a> support (allows you to update Facebook, Myspace, etc., with your Twitter updates.)</p>
<p>Both TweetDeck and Twhirl both require <a title="Adobe Air" href="http://www.adobe.com/products/air/" target="_blank">Adobe Air</a>, a free download from Adobe.</p>
<h2>TweetGrid</h2>
<p><a href="http://www.tweetgrid.com"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-102" title="tweetgrid" src="http://www.journalistical.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/tweetgrid-150x150.jpg" alt="tweetgrid" width="150" height="150" /></a>TweetGrid allows you to create custom-sized grids to track any given topic on the fly and save them for sharing or future use.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>TwitPicGrid, a <a title="TwitPicGrid" href="http://tweetgrid.com/twitpicgrid?r=in" target="_blank">recently released feature</a> allows the same concept to be applied to pictures from TwitPic.</p>

<p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/QtydMqLvpPGC5-rconzBs_WaF8I/0/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/QtydMqLvpPGC5-rconzBs_WaF8I/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a><br/>
<a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/QtydMqLvpPGC5-rconzBs_WaF8I/1/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/QtydMqLvpPGC5-rconzBs_WaF8I/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a></p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/feedburner/gnqf/~4/SOZndDYqb00" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.journalistical.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=76</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.journalistical.com/?p=76</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Coming…</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/feedburner/gnqf/~3/9G_KIwaVr5I/</link>
		<comments>http://www.journalistical.com/?p=74#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 17:06:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[journalistical]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.journalistical.com/?p=74</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new design will be up today or tomorrow is  up&#8230;. still tweaking.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A new design <span style="text-decoration: line-through;">will be up today or tomorrow</span> is  up&#8230;. still tweaking.</p>

<p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/149JN9C0ZJV-taPC3wrGlLmY8yo/0/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/149JN9C0ZJV-taPC3wrGlLmY8yo/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a><br/>
<a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/149JN9C0ZJV-taPC3wrGlLmY8yo/1/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/149JN9C0ZJV-taPC3wrGlLmY8yo/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a></p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/feedburner/gnqf/~4/9G_KIwaVr5I" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.journalistical.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=74</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.journalistical.com/?p=74</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>The New York Times Considering Charging for Content (Again)</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/feedburner/gnqf/~3/Z5PM9uONcWg/</link>
		<comments>http://www.journalistical.com/?p=57#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2009 06:47:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[This is Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Keller]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[charging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NYT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paid content]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.journalistical.com/?p=57</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[via Bloomberg.com] In a recent Q &#38; A with Bill Keller, executive editor of The New York Times, he talked about, among other things, the move towards a paid content system, yet again. In the discussion, Keller talked about three possible ways for The Times to make money: - A subscription model (but not Times Select) [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[via <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&amp;sid=at4KmZvYijEM" target="_blank">Bloomberg.com</a>]</p>
<p>In a recent Q &amp; A with Bill Keller, executive editor of The New York Times, he talked about, among other things, the move towards a paid content system, yet again.</p>
<p>In the discussion, Keller talked about three possible ways for The Times to make money:</p>
<p><strong>- A subscription model (but</strong><em><strong> not</strong></em><strong> Times Select)</strong></p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;Times Select was not the answer, but it&#8217;s possible we just put the wrong stuff behind the wall.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p><strong>- A micro-payment model</strong></p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;The idea is that readers may not pay a subscription fee for a new Web site, but they might pay a few pennies every time they click on a page, if it was simple and frictionless.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p><strong>- New reading devices</strong> &#8211; which currently are dominated by Kindle downloads and Times Reader users.</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;So some people <span class="italic">are </span>paying for The Times online. Just not enough of them. So far.&#8221;</p></blockquote>

<p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/x-sF-XPOf5LHbtF8hmqh07ovsYE/0/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/x-sF-XPOf5LHbtF8hmqh07ovsYE/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a><br/>
<a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/x-sF-XPOf5LHbtF8hmqh07ovsYE/1/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/x-sF-XPOf5LHbtF8hmqh07ovsYE/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a></p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/feedburner/gnqf/~4/Z5PM9uONcWg" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.journalistical.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=57</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.journalistical.com/?p=57</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Reporters Told to Keep Log of Everything They Do</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/feedburner/gnqf/~3/rbc92EkWzeQ/</link>
		<comments>http://www.journalistical.com/?p=51#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 00:24:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Newsroom Happenings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Bend Tribune]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.journalistical.com/?p=51</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I recently opened a paper for school talking about the less work, more stories mentality that has crept into today&#8217;s journalism. However, this is not what I was imagining. The South Bend Tribune wants its reporters to be more productive. And by productive, they mean keep a log of everything they do. &#8220;We mean everything, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I recently opened a paper for school talking about the less work, more stories mentality that has crept into today&#8217;s journalism. However, this is not what I was imagining.</p>
<p>The <a href="http://www.southbendtribune.com/">South Bend Tribune </a>wants its reporters to be more productive. And by productive, they mean keep a log of <em>everything</em> they do.</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;We mean everything, from the most mundane county council advance to the beginning interview in the most ambitious investigation that may or may not see the light of day (or publication).&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Virginia Black, assistant managing editor/news, <a href="http://poynter.org/forum/view_post.asp?id=13790" target="_blank">sent out a memo</a> to the staff of the Tribune Thursday.</p>
<p>I understand trying to keep reporters on task, but this is taking it to an extreme.</p>

<p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/u0of-Mh8mLR_82A1xHAVEyoA_hQ/0/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/u0of-Mh8mLR_82A1xHAVEyoA_hQ/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a><br/>
<a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/u0of-Mh8mLR_82A1xHAVEyoA_hQ/1/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/u0of-Mh8mLR_82A1xHAVEyoA_hQ/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a></p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/feedburner/gnqf/~4/rbc92EkWzeQ" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.journalistical.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=51</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.journalistical.com/?p=51</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>BBC Staff to Vote About Going on Strike</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/feedburner/gnqf/~3/DDnl0tX0rYM/</link>
		<comments>http://www.journalistical.com/?p=48#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 19:04:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media Fights Back]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bbc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[strike]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.K.]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.journalistical.com/?p=48</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In response to possible cuts in BBC&#8217;s Scottish offices, workers across the United Kingdom are voting on whether or not to proceed with a company-wide strike &#8211; A move that would have a monstrous effect for news in the U.K. [via guardian.co.uk]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In response to possible cuts in BBC&#8217;s Scottish offices, workers across the United Kingdom are voting on whether or not to proceed with a company-wide strike &#8211; A move that would have a monstrous effect for news in the U.K.</p>
<p>[via <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2009/jan/29/bbc-ballot-nuj-strike">guardian.co.uk</a>]</p>

<p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/c8vgGCCkAuCUD-t0SqL7Jd6eWzE/0/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/c8vgGCCkAuCUD-t0SqL7Jd6eWzE/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a><br/>
<a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/c8vgGCCkAuCUD-t0SqL7Jd6eWzE/1/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/c8vgGCCkAuCUD-t0SqL7Jd6eWzE/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a></p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/feedburner/gnqf/~4/DDnl0tX0rYM" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.journalistical.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=48</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.journalistical.com/?p=48</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>The First of Many…</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/feedburner/gnqf/~3/vYpU4gCVhss/</link>
		<comments>http://www.journalistical.com/?p=25#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 00:00:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[journalistical]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://journalistical.com/?p=25</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is an interesting time to be a student entering the world of journalism. None of the major publications have a serious grasp on where the medium is heading and seem to have adopted a trial-and-error approach to social features and interactivity. In about a year, I will graduate and be in an overflowing job [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is an interesting time to be a student entering the world of journalism. None of the major publications have a serious grasp on where the medium is heading and seem to have adopted a trial-and-error approach to social features and interactivity.</p>
<p>In about a year, I will graduate and be in an overflowing job market. The problem may not be necessarily <span><span>finding a (decent) job, but maintaining it. Newspapers around the country are laying off (talented) reporters and editors.</span></span></p>
<p><span><span>Prognostications are not great for the business of newspapers either. The saddest news come from the closures that are being threatened around the country.</span></span></p>
<p><span><span>Just take a glimpse:</span></span></p>
<ol>
<li>The <a href="http://www.baltimoreexaminer.com/">Baltimore Examine</a><a href="http://www.baltimoreexaminer.com/">r</a> will close February 15 (dead link).</li>
<li>The <a href="http://www.tucsoncitizen.com/" target="_blank">Tucson Citizen</a> will <a href="http://www.tucsoncitizen.com/daily/frontpage/107869.php">look for a buyer until March 21</a>.</li>
<li>The <a href="http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/" target="_blank">Seattle Post-</a><span class="misspell"><a href="http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/" target="_blank">Intelligencer</a></span> will <a href="http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/2008609677_webpi09m.html" target="_blank">look for a buyer until March 10</a>, at which time, they will move to an online-only format.</li>
<li>The <a href="http://www.rockymountainnews.com/" target="_blank">Rocky Mountain News</a> has already passed its <a href="http://pressreleases.scripps.com/release/1089" target="_blank">January 16 deadline</a> to find a buyer.</li>
</ol>
<p>Even many of those who have been able to keep their jobs have been subjected to a forced unpaid leave for a week, courtesy of <span class="misspell"><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/15/business/media/15paper.html?_r=1&amp;ref=media" target="_blank">Gannett</a></span> and the <span class="misspell"><a href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2009/01/28/BAPC15JEIE.DTL">MediaNews</a></span><a href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2009/01/28/BAPC15JEIE.DTL"> Group</a>.</p>
<div>
<div>One of the biggest questions I still have is: Are media outlets going to move to a type of crowd-sourcing for their reporting? Sacrificing quality and increasing quantity, all to improve the bottom line. Hopefully, this won’t happen on a widespread scale, but it is something to think about.</div>
<p> </p>
<div>I think 2009-10 will be a transitional time for journalism. The aim of this blog is to chronicle the change. I hope to average 5-7 posts a week and will always strive to post more if possible.</div>
<p> </p>
<div>As Hunter S. Thompson said: <strong>“Buy the ticket, take the ride.”</strong></div>
</div>

<p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/axw_B7q0xFiw7RctXcEgLllOIHM/0/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/axw_B7q0xFiw7RctXcEgLllOIHM/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a><br/>
<a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/axw_B7q0xFiw7RctXcEgLllOIHM/1/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/axw_B7q0xFiw7RctXcEgLllOIHM/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a></p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/feedburner/gnqf/~4/vYpU4gCVhss" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.journalistical.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=25</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.journalistical.com/?p=25</feedburner:origLink></item>
	</channel>
</rss>
