<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:openSearch="http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0/" xmlns:blogger="http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008" xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0" version="2.0"><channel><atom:id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1523707327337901416</atom:id><lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2015 06:29:38 +0000</lastBuildDate><category>malware</category><category>reverse engineering</category><category>0day</category><category>conficker.e</category><category>botnet</category><category>CVE-2009-4324</category><category>exploit</category><category>mebroot</category><category>torpig</category><category>malware analysis</category><category>pdf</category><category>CVE-2010-0249</category><category>CVE-2010-4091</category><category>poc</category><category>printSeps</category><category>sinowal</category><category>Aurora</category><category>firefox</category><category>rootkit</category><category>APT</category><category>AS8452</category><category>Black Hat Seo</category><category>DDOS</category><category>DLL hijacking</category><category>Egypt Telecom</category><category>Internet isolation</category><category>as</category><category>bgp</category><category>bot</category><category>breach</category><category>bulkbin.cn</category><category>conficker.gen</category><category>cyberwar</category><category>data breach</category><category>ebnvnos.com</category><category>hd moore</category><category>javascript-analytics.com</category><category>mobile malware</category><category>rbn</category><category>sourceforge</category><category>waledac</category><category>318x</category><category>Android</category><category>Backdoor.Pirpi</category><category>Bo</category><category>CVE-2004-0194</category><category>CVE-2010-0806</category><category>CVE-2010-3765</category><category>CVE-2010-3962</category><category>DroidKungFu</category><category>Egypt</category><category>Exploit-Comele</category><category>HTRAN</category><category>LATVIA</category><category>Licat</category><category>Murofet</category><category>Operation Shady RAT</category><category>RSA</category><category>SpyEye</category><category>TDSS</category><category>VB.AAG Trojan</category><category>Zbot.B</category><category>afcore</category><category>anonops</category><category>bgplay</category><category>bug</category><category>censorship</category><category>china</category><category>chymine.a</category><category>conficker.c</category><category>coreflood</category><category>cve-2010-2568</category><category>cve-2011-0609</category><category>cyberwarfare</category><category>cymru</category><category>debugging</category><category>diginotar</category><category>dllhijacking</category><category>downadup.gen</category><category>e107</category><category>eldorado rootkit</category><category>encoding</category><category>entrypoint</category><category>ettercap</category><category>exploi</category><category>exploiting</category><category>exploits</category><category>exposed</category><category>flash</category><category>flash player.</category><category>full disclosure</category><category>fuzzing</category><category>info</category><category>irc</category><category>java</category><category>korea</category><category>leechers</category><category>loic</category><category>lsass</category><category>massive spreading</category><category>memory corruption</category><category>metasploit</category><category>mmspicture.ru</category><category>owned</category><category>paimei</category><category>pbot</category><category>printSeps()</category><category>pushbot</category><category>robtex</category><category>rogue</category><category>russian business network</category><category>script</category><category>sql injection</category><category>stuxnet</category><category>tld</category><category>vispa</category><category>vmware</category><category>xpl.pdf</category><title>extraexploit</title><description></description><link>http://extraexploit.blogspot.com/</link><managingEditor>noreply@blogger.com (extraexploit)</managingEditor><generator>Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>98</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>25</openSearch:itemsPerPage><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1523707327337901416.post-3195789813827618024</guid><pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2012 21:58:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2015-05-21T05:50:41.733-07:00</atom:updated><title>extraexploit memories</title><atom:summary type="text">Months and years ago, I spent many nights trying to expose what the cyber security was (is) avoiding the  academic perspective, although, my first post was quite close to an academic point of view   (the top cc tld called by conficker.C). I can remember a lot of posts never completed and tons and tons of grammar ,spelling and language mistakes... however I hope that something is still remained </atom:summary><link>http://extraexploit.blogspot.com/2012/11/extraexploit-memories.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (extraexploit)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1523707327337901416.post-7445088261888353752</guid><pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 07:18:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2012-01-29T03:54:47.074-08:00</atom:updated><title>the last/final touch!</title><atom:summary type="text">It&#39;s very sad to recognize and discover that the screenshots on my blog, which for some reason have been saved in the &quot;Gallery&quot; of my Android mobile phone, once cleared from there, will be deleted from the Google cloud! Someone could confirm this ? This blog has been to me a lot although I have ceased to update it ... but with this last touch .. I almost want to finalize it.

what remains of my </atom:summary><link>http://extraexploit.blogspot.com/2012/01/last-touch.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (extraexploit)</author><thr:total>1</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1523707327337901416.post-9161919654827941976</guid><pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 10:38:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2011-09-15T01:49:44.225-07:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">APT</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">cyberwar</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">data breach</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">diginotar</category><title>DigiNotar facts - just some links</title><atom:summary type="text">



DigiNotar Certificate Authority breach “Operation Black Tulip”

http://t.co/VC91bjo 

DigiNotar CA compromise
http://community.websense.com/blogs/securitylabs/archive/2011/08/30/diginotar-ca-compromise.aspx 

Certificate hacker probably paid by Iran, say victimised firms
http://computerworld.co.nz/news.nsf/security/certificate-hacker-probably-paid-by-iran-say-victimized-firms

DigiNotar </atom:summary><link>http://extraexploit.blogspot.com/2011/09/diginotar-facts-just-some-links.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (extraexploit)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1523707327337901416.post-2086860530408859319</guid><pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2011 09:18:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2011-08-04T02:49:34.099-07:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">APT</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">cyberwar</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">HTRAN</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Operation Shady RAT</category><title>Operation Shady RAT - HTran</title><atom:summary type="text">HTran and the Advanced Persistent Threat
http://www.secureworks.com/research/threats/htran/

The code  http://www.pudn.com/downloads119/sourcecode/windows/network/detail508294.html. 
(appears also in the Secureworks analysis)

What follows it&#39;s an abstract of the code:

 </atom:summary><link>http://extraexploit.blogspot.com/2011/08/operation-shady-rat-htran-is-this-code.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (extraexploit)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-nerfdsf3Im8/TjpjW_gDE7I/AAAAAAAABB0/DxWSTVEJhO0/s72-c/htran.png" height="72" width="72"/><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1523707327337901416.post-6652975876595834124</guid><pubDate>Mon, 04 Jul 2011 13:12:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2012-01-26T23:19:52.755-08:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">CVE-2004-0194</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">encoding</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">exploit</category><title>an old bug for a new job ? CVE-2004-0194</title><atom:summary type="text">
A couple of months ago I receive an interesting challenge for get the final (I think) step in the job selection path for a big company (not a well known exploit research company but probably if you are reading this post you are using once of their os). The challenge it consist in the writing an exploit for the CVE-2004-0194. Obviously, at the first step I did follow, was a good googling acrivity</atom:summary><link>http://extraexploit.blogspot.com/2011/07/old-bug-for-new-job-cve-2004-0194.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (extraexploit)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-goi_MWbNzJA/ThG5KYpgAAI/AAAAAAAAA9U/q4zkN55vo1I/s72-c/NEOHAPSIS+-+Peace+of+Mind+Through+Integrity+and+Insight+-+Mozilla+Firefox_2011-07-04_14-56-07.png" height="72" width="72"/><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1523707327337901416.post-3741072392835435700</guid><pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 14:13:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2011-06-22T13:49:31.299-07:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">TDSS</category><title>TDSS - SRVs list</title><atom:summary type="text">I just found via pastebin (http://pastebin.com/jWDhEfGB) a domains list related to TDSS. The SRVs , in according with this analysis http://resources.infosecinstitute.com/tdss4-part-2/, are the C&amp;C from where bots receive commands.What&#39;s sound a bit strange is that the content in the pastebin above match with the syntax used in the configuration file of the rootkit. Anyway is possible count 2514 </atom:summary><link>http://extraexploit.blogspot.com/2011/06/tdss-srvs-list.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (extraexploit)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1523707327337901416.post-7768553909932247716</guid><pubDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2011 12:33:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2012-01-26T23:33:33.877-08:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Android</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">china</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">DroidKungFu</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">mobile malware</category><title>DroidKungFu - just some piece of code</title><atom:summary type="text">Following the trend of the moment, I play a bit with the sample of DroidKungFu retrieved from the  contagiodump malware sample repository. For obtaining the JAR archive I used dex2jar (http://code.google.com/p/dex2jar/downloads/list) after that I extracted the Dalvik Executable Format embedded in the APK. Once obtained the JAR file is very easy obtain the clear code with (for example) Java </atom:summary><link>http://extraexploit.blogspot.com/2011/06/droidkungfu-just-some-piece-of-code.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (extraexploit)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-a8krR0DGeB0/Te4W6CHRS8I/AAAAAAAAA8w/fvuBs7ck5n4/s72-c/shot001.PNG" height="72" width="72"/><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1523707327337901416.post-4857918347350799840</guid><pubDate>Fri, 18 Mar 2011 14:19:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2011-03-18T07:21:10.622-07:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">bug</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">flash player.</category><title>FlashUtil10m_Plugin.exe command line crash</title><atom:summary type="text">Is interesting observing how nowadays some old style bug are still available. I think that this one is not a security bug but a deeper investigation is left to all whose are interested.Anyway is sufficient pass a single char as command line parameter to this FlashUtil10m_Plugin.exe (also called Flash Player Installer/Uninstaller) for generate a crash. If you are Admin appear something like the </atom:summary><link>http://extraexploit.blogspot.com/2011/03/flashutil10mpluginexe-command-line.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (extraexploit)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="https://lh4.googleusercontent.com/-RCNH2zebZqQ/TYNmzoFO0SI/AAAAAAAAA8g/lRSVUp3oqCA/s72-c/flashcrash.PNG" height="72" width="72"/><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1523707327337901416.post-2905440232448788400</guid><pubDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2011 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2011-04-04T07:42:13.818-07:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">cve-2011-0609</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">data breach</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">RSA</category><title>cve-2011-0609 - bugix blog analysis</title><atom:summary type="text">April 4, 2011 - Update:
RSA has release a blog post where is described that in the recently data-breach is been used this issue:
http://blogs.rsa.com/rivner/anatomy-of-an-attack/

March 15, 2011:  
A researcher has just added a very interesting analysis about this 0day:

bugix blog cve-2010-0609 analysis - by villys777 
http://bugix-security.blogspot.com/2011/03/</atom:summary><link>http://extraexploit.blogspot.com/2011/03/cve-2011-0609-bugix-blog-analysis.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (extraexploit)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1523707327337901416.post-8816299686305873099</guid><pubDate>Sun, 06 Mar 2011 12:13:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2011-03-16T18:48:09.066-07:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">mmspicture.ru</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">mobile malware</category><title>mmspicture.ru - mobile malware depot</title><atom:summary type="text">Following a well known mailing list (clean-mx aka viruswatch) it was been retrieved the following URL:

http://mmspicture.ru/mms112/mms112.jar (md5: 33EA90E2029478D47D33409B5F48E4EB)

The JAR file is already detected from Virustotal. Playing a bit around the URL path is possible retrieve another JAR file: 

http://mmspicture.ru/mms113/mms113.jar

The MD5 (4CC0EBCE1428EE3649C67A13734F2EDE) of this</atom:summary><link>http://extraexploit.blogspot.com/2011/03/mmspictureru-mobile-malware-depot.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (extraexploit)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/-yWSp84Zje9k/TXNnNdfwmUI/AAAAAAAAA8E/FHyahgEjrTo/s72-c/javasshot001.PNG" height="72" width="72"/><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1523707327337901416.post-4178313689334547061</guid><pubDate>Wed, 02 Feb 2011 20:36:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2011-02-02T15:33:58.876-08:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">AS8452</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Egypt Telecom</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Internet isolation</category><title>Egypt Telecom back online– ASN8452 TE DATA– prefix 81.10.0.0/17</title><atom:summary type="text">The prefix 81.10.0.0/17 “ALL-Routes” seems announced again to the rest of the world via Telecom Italia Sparkle Autonomous System (ASN 6762). Here the animation made  with BGPlay:







The time range is between the 29 of January 2011 00:00 and 2 of February 2011 08:00 PM (local time). For more info on bgplay see my previous post  http://extraexploit.blogspot.com/2011/01/</atom:summary><link>http://extraexploit.blogspot.com/2011/02/egypt-telecom-back-online-asn8452-te.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (extraexploit)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1523707327337901416.post-6341740085920559177</guid><pubDate>Fri, 28 Jan 2011 13:45:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2011-02-02T12:48:19.059-08:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">AS8452</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">bgplay</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">censorship</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">cyberwarfare</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Egypt</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Egypt Telecom</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Internet isolation</category><title>Egypt Telecom AS isolation - BGPlay show it ?</title><atom:summary type="text">January 31, 2011 – Update:
An interesting snapshot of Egyptian&#39;s malware activity. ASN 20928 appears like still active

Egypt&#39;s malware activity post internet shutdownhttp://www.unveillance.com/latest-news/egypts-malware-activity-post-internet-shutdown/

Why One Egyptian ISP is Still Online 
http://newsgrange.com/why-one-egyptian-isp-is-still-online/

January 29, 2011 – Update:

I try to make the</atom:summary><link>http://extraexploit.blogspot.com/2011/01/egypt-telecom-as-isolation-bgplay-show.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (extraexploit)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_uioOPkGBTsE/TULHmC9r0VI/AAAAAAAAA7o/BPcb5KqfSTw/s72-c/egypt001.PNG" height="72" width="72"/><thr:total>2</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1523707327337901416.post-7905162261028762228</guid><pubDate>Sat, 22 Jan 2011 20:34:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2011-02-03T01:26:49.005-08:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">bot</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">botnet</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">breach</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">e107</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">entrypoint</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">sourceforge</category><title>the sourceforge entry point seems still active</title><atom:summary type="text">February 3, 2011 - Update:

A discussion on e107 official web site: http://e107.org/comment.php?comment.news.878


February 2, 2011 - Update:   
  
Just another evidence of the sourceforge breach used by a web bot. At least , from the following screenshot, seems that the entrypoint was detected by a web vuln scanner bot. The following figure shown a well known method by web bots to post in some </atom:summary><link>http://extraexploit.blogspot.com/2011/01/sourceforge-entry-point-seems-still.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (extraexploit)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_uioOPkGBTsE/TUlp24Iu0-I/AAAAAAAAA74/AOofSh3xHHU/s72-c/sourceforgeevidence.PNG" height="72" width="72"/><thr:total>2</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1523707327337901416.post-7191218177705762554</guid><pubDate>Wed, 29 Dec 2010 18:06:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2010-12-30T00:03:04.940-08:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">bot</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">breach</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">ettercap</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">exposed</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">owned</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">pbot</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">sourceforge</category><title>some considerations on Ettercap source code repository breach</title><atom:summary type="text">Recently it’s been released a new issue of a zine called “owned and exposed” (http://www.exploit-db.com/papers/15823/). I have to admit I laughed a lot when I saw this picture.                        I think that the picture above is the truth of what the security field is today. Anyway , ending my personal considerations, I would show you a mind map that I made during a past research on web bot </atom:summary><link>http://extraexploit.blogspot.com/2010/12/some-considerations-on-ettercap-source.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (extraexploit)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://lh6.ggpht.com/_uioOPkGBTsE/TRt4sDpWsfI/AAAAAAAAA64/uBlcTMYcxGo/s72-c/ownedandexposed_thumb%5B4%5D.png?imgmax=800" height="72" width="72"/><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1523707327337901416.post-6591326666264634186</guid><pubDate>Tue, 14 Dec 2010 09:33:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2010-12-14T17:24:39.787-08:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">anonops</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">DDOS</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">loic</category><title>LOIC 1.1.1.15 - Crafted C&amp;C Channel Topic Could Lead A Crash</title><atom:summary type="text">Following the trend of these days I played (locally) with one of the latest release of LOIC (Low Orbit Ion Cannon DDOS Tool). Inserting a long (not so) string on the topic of a C&amp;C irc channel, there seems to be a memory corruption condition.

 The screen shot above show a crafted topic that trigger the issue. The impacted tested released is the 1.1.1.15. A few more details related to the .NET </atom:summary><link>http://extraexploit.blogspot.com/2010/12/loic-11115-buffer-overflow.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (extraexploit)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_uioOPkGBTsE/TQc5UUAz6EI/AAAAAAAAA6k/c_p20H8dtD0/s72-c/loicbof.PNG" height="72" width="72"/><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1523707327337901416.post-7080032269034200183</guid><pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2010 11:15:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2010-11-30T03:17:25.258-08:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">0day</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">CVE-2010-4091</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">pdf</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">poc</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">printSeps</category><title>cve-2010-4091 exploited ? – 0.2 – Adobe Reader 9.3.0</title><atom:summary type="text">Starting from the malwaretracker sample (see my previous posts) seem that edx and ecx are set to some interesting values:    </atom:summary><link>http://extraexploit.blogspot.com/2010/11/cve-2010-4091-exploited-02-adobe-reader.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (extraexploit)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://lh4.ggpht.com/_uioOPkGBTsE/TPTdQxcEq0I/AAAAAAAAA6c/7eqDgYMBDU8/s72-c/overwritten_thumb%5B3%5D.png?imgmax=800" height="72" width="72"/><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1523707327337901416.post-5056704185624649049</guid><pubDate>Thu, 25 Nov 2010 16:43:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2010-11-26T02:33:08.983-08:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">0day</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">CVE-2010-4091</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">pdf</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">poc</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">printSeps</category><title>cve-2010-4091 exploited ? – 0.1</title><atom:summary type="text">Trying to reversing the shell code contained within the PDF that seem exploit CVE-2010-4091, in according with the sample reported by MalwareTracker, it’s been founded the following URL:   http://212.117.168.89/ad/fi_16.php                         From Robtex:                         The URL above at this time is down or not more available. Did really exploited for retrieve malware from </atom:summary><link>http://extraexploit.blogspot.com/2010/11/cve-2010-4091-exploited-01.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (extraexploit)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://lh6.ggpht.com/_uioOPkGBTsE/TO6SLHwPl0I/AAAAAAAAA6M/VykhH7kkUUk/s72-c/image_thumb%5B3%5D.png?imgmax=800" height="72" width="72"/><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1523707327337901416.post-1957385644476162943</guid><pubDate>Fri, 19 Nov 2010 14:40:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2010-11-24T14:00:08.301-08:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">CVE-2010-4091</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">pdf</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">poc</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">printSeps</category><title>cve-2010-4091 exploited ?</title><atom:summary type="text">November 24,  2010 – Update:  Looking for other  exploiting attempts I found a Malwaretracker sample where the PDF seem spread via URL that contains:  filepdf.php@v=zday     The following analysis report the objects used within this PDF (that is different from the fulldisclosure PDF):  http://www.malwaretracker.com/pdfsearch.php?hash=0398e68507882a38a26a341058c94653&amp;submit=Search     November 22 </atom:summary><link>http://extraexploit.blogspot.com/2010/11/cve-2010-4091-exploited.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (extraexploit)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://lh6.ggpht.com/_uioOPkGBTsE/TO0hZNBIpYI/AAAAAAAAA6E/l9rh-MkoK0I/s72-c/image_thumb%5B3%5D.png?imgmax=800" height="72" width="72"/><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1523707327337901416.post-5718083974596246122</guid><pubDate>Fri, 12 Nov 2010 00:57:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2010-11-27T15:59:23.027-08:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">0day</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">CVE-2010-4091</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">pdf</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">printSeps</category><title>cve-2010-4091 – printSeps - exploitation attempts</title><atom:summary type="text">November 26, 2010 – update:     This is a very useful  presentation (from Immunity Sec) where is possible get some methods for approach the reversing of  Java script engine in Adobe Reader context:        Attacking Embedded Languages     http://www.immunitysec.com/downloads/ID_reCON_2008.odp        November 16, 2010 – update:      In previous post I didn’t report where is the place in the </atom:summary><link>http://extraexploit.blogspot.com/2010/11/cve-2010-4091-printseps-exploitation.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (extraexploit)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://lh4.ggpht.com/_uioOPkGBTsE/TOKuqHxJeeI/AAAAAAAAA5Y/woww-pPWtmc/s72-c/image_thumb%5B3%5D.png?imgmax=800" height="72" width="72"/><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1523707327337901416.post-5163498914798326035</guid><pubDate>Thu, 04 Nov 2010 15:24:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2010-11-27T15:51:01.429-08:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">0day</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">CVE-2010-4091</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">exploit</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">pdf</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">printSeps()</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">xpl.pdf</category><title>full disclosure xpl.pdf Adober Reader 9.4 poc - printSeps() - cve-2010-4091</title><atom:summary type="text">     November 26,2010 – Update:            Thank you, Mario, but our printSeps() is in another castle !      http://esec-lab.sogeti.com/dotclear/index.php?post/2010/11/26/Thank-you-Mario-but-our-printSeps%28%29-is-in-another-castle  November 22, 2010 – Update:  Who’s looking for eggs in your PDF?  (reported also in  cve-2010-4091 exploited ?)      http://labs.m86security.com/2010/11/</atom:summary><link>http://extraexploit.blogspot.com/2010/11/full-disclosure-xplpdf-adober-reader-94.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (extraexploit)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_uioOPkGBTsE/TNf8hzluK1I/AAAAAAAAA5E/efI3o7cbR8s/s72-c/printseps0003.PNG" height="72" width="72"/><thr:total>2</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1523707327337901416.post-5246424657732455201</guid><pubDate>Wed, 03 Nov 2010 16:09:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2010-11-12T01:35:27.214-08:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">0day</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Backdoor.Pirpi</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">CVE-2010-3962</category><title>CVE-2010-3962 - yet another Internet Explorer RCE</title><atom:summary type="text">Update - November, 12 2010:
Amnesty International Hong Kong Website Injected With Latest Internet Explorer 0-day 
http://community.websense.com/blogs/securitylabs/archive/2010/11/10/Amnesty-International-Hong-Kong-Website-Injected-With-Latest-Internet-Explorer-0_2D00_day-.aspx

 
Update - November, 5 2010:
CVE-2010-3962 - BindShell proof of concept:
http://www.offensive-security.com/0day/</atom:summary><link>http://extraexploit.blogspot.com/2010/11/cve-2010-3962-yet-another-internet.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (extraexploit)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_uioOPkGBTsE/TNJ8QdpimzI/AAAAAAAAA48/paJTav91ieA/s72-c/cve-2010-3962.JPG" height="72" width="72"/><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1523707327337901416.post-4432438860368456209</guid><pubDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2010 09:40:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2010-10-29T03:05:11.577-07:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">0day</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">CVE-2010-3765</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">exploit</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">firefox</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">poc</category><title>CVE-2010-3765 - proof of concept - update</title><atom:summary type="text">October, 29 1010 - UPDATE: the working exploit (in according with BugX blog): 
http://bugix-security.blogspot.com/2010/10/firefox-exploitcve-2010-3765.html
   
October, 28 2010 
For those who still do not know .. The proof of concept for CVE-2010-3765 is the following:



 















 More details at: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=607222. The issue seem resolved with Firefox </atom:summary><link>http://extraexploit.blogspot.com/2010/10/cve-2010-3765-proof-of-concept.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (extraexploit)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_uioOPkGBTsE/TMlEW_6V-NI/AAAAAAAAA44/MwWjjSD01UA/s72-c/cve-2010-CVE-3765.JPG" height="72" width="72"/><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1523707327337901416.post-4687804388596796065</guid><pubDate>Thu, 14 Oct 2010 15:24:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2010-11-02T03:22:14.915-07:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Licat</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Murofet</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Zbot.B</category><title>Some domains for the LICAT / Murofet / Trojan/ZBOT.B threat</title><atom:summary type="text">Update (2 November): A deep and very itneresting analysis from Trend Micro:
http://us.trendmicro.com/imperia/md/content/us/trendwatch/researchandanalysis/file-patching_zbot_variants_-_zeus_2.0_levels_up__oct_2010_.pdf

Update (15 October):  ThreatExpert has release the domain name generation algorithm for MUROFET/Licat 
http://blog.threatexpert.com/2010/10/domain-name-generator-for-murofet.html

</atom:summary><link>http://extraexploit.blogspot.com/2010/10/some-domains-for-licatmurofettrojanzbot.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (extraexploit)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1523707327337901416.post-5681959278754853763</guid><pubDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2010 14:12:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2011-01-23T06:02:26.657-08:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Black Hat Seo</category><title>dollars javascript code – yet another Javascript obfuscation method for cc frauds ( and black hat seo ) – part 0.2</title><atom:summary type="text">Trying to find some common factors in the pages included in the compromised sites (as indicated in the previous post (http://extraexploit.blogspot.com/2010/10/dollars-javascript-code-yet-another.html) there is evidence of a large number of sites that are suffering the same problem. In particular, using keywords that are common to many of these malicious pages, you have the following results:    
</atom:summary><link>http://extraexploit.blogspot.com/2010/10/dollars-javascript-code-yet-another_06.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (extraexploit)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://lh5.ggpht.com/_uioOPkGBTsE/TKyDg32dvDI/AAAAAAAAA4k/JWrpIjGy-6c/s72-c/sshot002_thumb%5B4%5D.png?imgmax=800" height="72" width="72"/><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1523707327337901416.post-2941473789882491532</guid><pubDate>Tue, 05 Oct 2010 23:17:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2011-01-25T02:16:38.719-08:00</atom:updated><title>dollars javascript code – yet another Javascript obfuscation method for cc frauds</title><atom:summary type="text">January 25,  2011 – Update:
a detailed analysis also where is reported my post:
Internet  Explorer  exSploit Milk codes  
http://utf-8.jp/public/20101106/avtokyo.pptx
 
October 5, 2010:
From MDL forum, I get a post where a user (many thanks to Edgar) has been reported a strange Javascript code injected in some Italian web site. Specifically the message is located at the following URL: 
 http://</atom:summary><link>http://extraexploit.blogspot.com/2010/10/dollars-javascript-code-yet-another.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (extraexploit)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://lh5.ggpht.com/_uioOPkGBTsE/TKuzaGchYDI/AAAAAAAAA3A/uE3eKBGtndM/s72-c/dollarscode001_thumb%5B15%5D.png?imgmax=800" height="72" width="72"/><thr:total>3</thr:total></item></channel></rss>