<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><!--Generated by Squarespace Site Server v5.11.80 (http://www.squarespace.com/) on Tue, 18 Oct 2011 15:44:35 GMT--><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0"><channel><title>Electricity Data</title><link>http://www.electricitydata.com/electricitydata/</link><description /><lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Feb 2011 17:43:07 +0000</lastBuildDate><copyright /><language>en-US</language><generator>Squarespace Site Server v5.11.80 (http://www.squarespace.com/)</generator><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/electricitydata/tXdH" /><feedburner:info uri="electricitydata/txdh" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><feedburner:browserFriendly></feedburner:browserFriendly><item><title>U.S. Residential Electricity Prices Trending Up</title><category>Electricity Price</category><category>electricity rates</category><category>projections</category><category>residential</category><dc:creator>ed</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 11 Feb 2011 16:34:11 +0000</pubDate><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/electricitydata/tXdH/~3/yFRS5zbyunI/us-residential-electricity-prices-trending-up.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">454334:6180712:10449237</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Residential electricity rates have risen 1.93% from 1992 to 2010 on a compounded annual basis, which compares favorably with the rate of inflation over the same time frame. Nevertheless, the trend remains up.&amp;nbsp; From &lt;a href="http://www.texastribune.org/texas-energy/energy/will-texas-blackouts-cause-higher-electric-rates/"&gt;Texas &lt;/a&gt;to &lt;a href="http://www.redding.com/news/2011/feb/13/editorial_sunday_2/"&gt;California&lt;/a&gt; to &lt;a href="http://timesfreepress.com/news/2011/feb/11/electric-rates-going-march/"&gt;Tennessee&lt;/a&gt;, concern over rising rates remains high.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The chart below from The Energy Information Administration shows the monthly average electricity rate in the U.S. from 2000-2010 with projections through 2012.&amp;nbsp; Annual growth rates are graphed at the bottom.&amp;nbsp; Note the annual growth rate (not compounded growth rate) was much higher through the first part of the decade.&amp;nbsp; However, projections of 0.6% and 0.7% in 2011 and 2012 appear unusually low by comparison.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Added to the EIA chart is the red price channel.&amp;nbsp; Price channeling is a stock market charting technique, but used here to illustrate that electricity rate projections are predicted to remain near the bottom of the channel the next two years.&amp;nbsp; Is this a reasonable expectation?&amp;nbsp; Not likely.&amp;nbsp; In light of current expansionary monetary policies, price increases in the commodities and raw materials used in electric generation will push electricity prices above the 0.7% expected increase.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span class="full-image-block ssNonEditable"&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;img style="width: 630px;" src="http://www.electricitydata.com/storage/Fig23 Electricity Residential Prices in US - 2012 with trendlines.gif?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1297615496706" alt="" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/electricitydata/tXdH/~4/yFRS5zbyunI" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.electricitydata.com/electricitydata/rss-comments-entry-10449237.xml</wfw:commentRss><feedburner:origLink>http://www.electricitydata.com/electricitydata/2011/2/11/us-residential-electricity-prices-trending-up.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Electric power industry lobbying expenses 1998-2010</title><category>American Public Power Association</category><category>Edison Electric Institute</category><category>Lobbying</category><category>National Rural Electric Cooperative Association</category><category>OpenSecrets.org</category><category>political influence</category><dc:creator>ed</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 09 Feb 2011 19:04:52 +0000</pubDate><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/electricitydata/tXdH/~3/Vp_bX2ryP4Q/electric-power-industry-lobbying-expenses-1998-2010.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">454334:6180712:10420154</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;If money talks, then electric utilities have been some of the loudest voices in Washington over the past decade.&amp;nbsp; Electric power utilities ranked third in the nation in lobbying expenses over the period from 1998-2010, according to OpenSecrets.org, a non-partisan group which tracks the influence of campaign money on elections and public policy.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Over the 12 year period, electric utilities spent $1.42 billion on lobbying, topped only by insurance at $1.5 billion and pharmaceuticals at $2.08 billion, according to OpenSecrets' &lt;a href="http://www.opensecrets.org/lobby/top.php?indexType=i"&gt;website&lt;/a&gt;.&amp;nbsp; In 2010 alone, the industry spent $191 million, employing 902 lobbyists in the process.&amp;nbsp; PG&amp;amp;E Corp. was the biggest lobbyist in 2010 spending $45.4 million, followed by Southern Co. ($13.2 million), Edison Electric Institute ($13.1 million), American Electric Power ($10.3 million), and Duke Energy ($6.5 million).&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The following charts show industry level spending since 1998, plus expenditures of the industry's three national trade associations.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.opensecrets.org/lobby/indusclient.php?year=2010&amp;amp;lname=E08&amp;amp;id="&gt;Electric Industry Lobbying Expenditures&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style="padding-left: 30px;"&gt;&lt;span class="full-image-block ssNonEditable"&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.opensecrets.org/lobby/IMG_client_year_comp.php?lname=E08&amp;amp;type=n&amp;amp;__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1297278547047" alt="" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.opensecrets.org/lobby/clientsum.php?year=2010&amp;amp;lname=Edison+Electric+Institute&amp;amp;id="&gt;Edison Electric Institute&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style="padding-left: 30px;"&gt;&lt;span class="full-image-block ssNonEditable"&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.opensecrets.org/lobby/IMG_client_year_comp.php?lname=Edison+Electric+Institute&amp;amp;type=c&amp;amp;__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1297278402186" alt="" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.opensecrets.org/lobby/clientsum.php?year=2010&amp;amp;lname=National+Rural+Electric+Cooperative+Assn&amp;amp;id="&gt;National Rural Electric Cooperative Association&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style="padding-left: 30px;"&gt;&lt;span class="full-image-block ssNonEditable"&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.opensecrets.org/lobby/IMG_client_year_comp.php?lname=National+Rural+Electric+Cooperative+Assn&amp;amp;type=c&amp;amp;__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1297278385895" alt="" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.opensecrets.org/lobby/clientsum.php?lname=American+Public+Power+Assn&amp;amp;year=1998"&gt;American Public Power Association&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style="padding-left: 30px;"&gt;&lt;span class="full-image-block ssNonEditable"&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.opensecrets.org/lobby/IMG_client_year_comp.php?lname=American+Public+Power+Assn&amp;amp;type=c&amp;amp;__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1297278451591" alt="" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Chart and Data Source: &lt;a href="http://www.opensecrets.org/lobby/indusclient.php?year=1998&amp;amp;lname=E08&amp;amp;id="&gt;OpenSecrets.org&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/electricitydata/tXdH/~4/Vp_bX2ryP4Q" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.electricitydata.com/electricitydata/rss-comments-entry-10420154.xml</wfw:commentRss><feedburner:origLink>http://www.electricitydata.com/electricitydata/2011/2/9/electric-power-industry-lobbying-expenses-1998-2010.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Employment projections in electric power industry</title><category>BLS</category><category>Bureau of Labor Statistics</category><category>Distribution</category><category>Electric Power Industry</category><category>Employment</category><category>Generation</category><category>Transmission</category><category>employment</category><category>employment projections</category><dc:creator>ed</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 09 Feb 2011 15:34:17 +0000</pubDate><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/electricitydata/tXdH/~3/l1zzDt9XMNo/employment-projections-in-electric-power-industry.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">454334:6180712:10418204</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;The electric power industry is shrinking in terms of total employment and will decline further if Bureau of Labor Statistic &lt;a href="http://www.bls.gov/emp/ep_table_207.htm"&gt;employment projections&lt;/a&gt; hold.&amp;nbsp; The data survey is conducted every ten years and covers total employment in the generation, transmission, and distribution (GTD) sectors of the industry.&amp;nbsp; Natual gas and water utilities are not included in the following employment projections.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Total power industry employment has fallen from 443,800 in 1998 to 404,700 in 2008.&amp;nbsp; BLS projections estimate the industry at 345,700 employees by 2018.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span class="full-image-block ssNonEditable"&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;img style="width: 630px;" src="http://www.electricitydata.com/storage/Electric%20Power%20Industry%20Employment%20Projections%202008-2018.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1297268300600" alt="" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;On an absolute basis, the changes in industry employment from 1998 to 2008 is a net loss of 39,100 jobs.&amp;nbsp; By 2018, the industry employment level is expected to lose another 59,000.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span class="full-image-block ssNonEditable"&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;img style="width: 630px;" src="http://www.electricitydata.com/storage/Change%20in%20Electric%20Power%20Industry%20Employment%201998-2008%20and%202008-2018.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1297268322680" alt="" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The final chart shows the annual growth rate in employment in the electric power industry.&amp;nbsp; Employment prospects are not as promising as other industries.&amp;nbsp; From 1998 to 2008, the annual employment growth rate was -0.9%.&amp;nbsp; Unfortunately the decline will accelerate to -1.6% during the 2008-2018 period.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span class="full-image-block ssNonEditable"&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;img style="width: 630px;" src="http://www.electricitydata.com/storage/Annual%20Growth%20Rate%20Electric%20Power%20Industry%20Employment.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1297268337166" alt="" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.bls.gov/emp/ep_table_207.htm"&gt;Data Source&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Related Link: &lt;a href="http://www.bls.gov/opub/mlr/2009/11/art1full.pdf"&gt;The employment projections 2008-2018&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/electricitydata/tXdH/~4/l1zzDt9XMNo" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.electricitydata.com/electricitydata/rss-comments-entry-10418204.xml</wfw:commentRss><feedburner:origLink>http://www.electricitydata.com/electricitydata/2011/2/9/employment-projections-in-electric-power-industry.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Idaho project triples wind generating capacity, state ranks 15th nationally</title><category>Generation</category><category>Idaho</category><category>Texas</category><category>Wind Power</category><category>capacity</category><category>power generation</category><category>wind</category><dc:creator>ed</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 08 Feb 2011 16:29:54 +0000</pubDate><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/electricitydata/tXdH/~3/u6PwDahwyOk/idaho-project-triples-wind-generating-capacity-state-ranks-1.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">454334:6180712:10403664</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;The largest wind generation project in Idaho history is now complete and delivering power to Idaho consumers, according to &lt;a href="http://www.magicvalley.com/news/local/west-end/article_4e0183e4-ed0e-5ece-bbfb-7cbc70f45228.html"&gt;local sources&lt;/a&gt;.&amp;nbsp; The wind farm is a joint venture between GE Energy Financial Services and Exergy Development Group, Atlantic Power Corporation and Reunion Power.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The $500 million project will provide 183 megawatts of capacity, up from the state's current capacity of 60 megawatts.&amp;nbsp; Texas leads the nation in wind-generation capacity with 1841 megawatts according to January 2011 &lt;a title="data" href="http://www.eia.doe.gov/cneaf/electricity/epm/table1_17_a.html"&gt;data&lt;/a&gt; from the Energy Information Administration (data available through October 2010).&amp;nbsp; Idaho's ranking in wind generating capacity moves to 15th in the nation with the new project, up from 23rd.&amp;nbsp; From Ocotber 2009 to October 2010, Idaho increased wind generation capacity by only 27 megawatts, an 82% increase.&amp;nbsp; However, the addition of 183 megawatts reflects a 305% increase.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span class="full-image-block ssNonEditable"&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;img style="width: 630px;" src="http://www.electricitydata.com/storage/Net Generatin from Wind by State October 2010.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1297183188753" alt="" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Nationally, wind generating capacity continues to increase.&amp;nbsp; Capacity increased 16.9% in the past year from 6,814 megawatts to 7,953.&amp;nbsp; However the bulk of the increase came from independent power producers (IPP),&amp;nbsp; like the Idaho project, rather than traditional electric utilities.&amp;nbsp; The following chart breakdowns the past year's growth in capacity by sector.&amp;nbsp; Traditional electric utilities increased their wind generating capacity by 11.7% in the past year, while IPPs increased capacity at an annual rate of 17.7%.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span class="full-image-block ssNonEditable"&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;img style="width: 630px;" src="http://www.electricitydata.com/storage/Wind%20Generation%20by%20Sector%20-%20Oct%2009%20vs%20Oct%2010.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1297184532691" alt="" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.eia.doe.gov/cneaf/electricity/epm/table1_17_a.html"&gt;Data Source&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/electricitydata/tXdH/~4/u6PwDahwyOk" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.electricitydata.com/electricitydata/rss-comments-entry-10403664.xml</wfw:commentRss><feedburner:origLink>http://www.electricitydata.com/electricitydata/2011/2/8/idaho-project-triples-wind-generating-capacity-state-ranks-1.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Colorado electric consumers have third lowest residential bills in nation</title><category>Colorado</category><category>Xcel</category><category>electricity rates</category><dc:creator>ed</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2011 13:00:07 +0000</pubDate><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/electricitydata/tXdH/~3/AH7f1G0PAWY/colorado-electric-consumers-have-third-lowest-residential-bi.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">454334:6180712:10378453</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;There is an interesting article in the Denver Post Sunday titled, "&lt;a href="http://www.kdvr.com/news/kdvr-xcel-rates-up-txt,0,3557351.story"&gt;Xcel electricity rates up 21 percent in Colorado&lt;/a&gt;."&amp;nbsp; Although accurate, the article is misleading.&amp;nbsp; It creates the impression electric utility rates in Colorado are high and getting higher.&amp;nbsp; By Colorado perspectives, rates are rising.&amp;nbsp; From a national perspective, many states would be happy to swap places with Colorado.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The paper reports Colorado residential customers pay an average of $68 a month for electricity.&amp;nbsp; Although the article mentions that Colorado's rates remain below the national average, it fails to mention just how far below the national average.&amp;nbsp; When looking at rates only, Colorado ranked 29th in the nation in lowest residential rates, with an average residential retail price of 11.19 cents/KWH compared with the national average of 11.62.&amp;nbsp; However, the residential consumers in Colorado pay some of the lowest bills in the nation.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span class="full-image-block ssNonEditable"&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;img style="width: 600px;" src="http://www.electricitydata.com/storage/Average Residential Monthly Bill 2009.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1297047864593" alt="" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;According to 2009 &lt;a href="http://www.eia.doe.gov/electricity/esr/table5_a.html"&gt;data&lt;/a&gt; from U.S. Energy Information Administration,  the latest for which monthly bill information is available, the  Colorado average residential bill of $68 a month ranks as the third  lowest in the nation.&amp;nbsp; Only New Mexico and Utah, with average  residential bills of $64.30 and $66.16 respectively, rank lower.&amp;nbsp; The  average monthly bill in the Mountain Division of the Census region is  $89.38.&amp;nbsp; The region includes Arizona, Idaho, Colorado, Montana, Nevada, New  Mexico, Utah, and Wyoming.&amp;nbsp; Colorado's average monthly bill is 23% below  the regional average and 34% below the national average of $104.52.&amp;nbsp;  Even if Xcel were to raise its rates another 20% over the next six years  as Xcel proposes, the average monthly bill would be only $82.43, still  far below the current national average.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/electricitydata/tXdH/~4/AH7f1G0PAWY" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.electricitydata.com/electricitydata/rss-comments-entry-10378453.xml</wfw:commentRss><feedburner:origLink>http://www.electricitydata.com/electricitydata/2011/2/7/colorado-electric-consumers-have-third-lowest-residential-bi.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Union vs Non-union wages 2000-2010</title><category>Current Population Survey</category><category>earnings</category><category>non-union</category><category>union</category><category>wages</category><dc:creator>ed</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2011 01:05:30 +0000</pubDate><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/electricitydata/tXdH/~3/3PSJUgSuH-8/union-vs-non-union-wages-2000-2010.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">454334:6180712:10378011</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Non-union workers are falling behind their union coworkers according to data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics Current Population Statistics.&amp;nbsp; Union weekly earnings at U.S. utilities rose from $838 in 2000 to $1193 in 2010, while non-union wages rose from $806 to $1014 during the same period.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Another way of looking at the wage difference is union weekly wages grew at an annual compounded rate of 3.59% over the decade while non-union wages grew at 2.32%. If the current trend continues over the coming decade, union weekly are expected to grow to $1697, while non-union weekly wages grow to $1275.&amp;nbsp; By 2020, the union wage premium will be 33% over non-union wages, up from the current 17%.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span class="full-image-block ssNonEditable"&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;img style="width: 630px;" src="http://www.electricitydata.com/storage/Union vs Non-Union Weekly Earnings at US Utilities 2000-2010.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1297040811859" alt="" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;Related Article: &lt;a href="http://electricitydata.squarespace.com/electricitydata/2011/2/2/union-membership-in-utilities-increases-84-wages-up-71-in-20.html"&gt;Union membership in electric utilities&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/electricitydata/tXdH/~4/3PSJUgSuH-8" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.electricitydata.com/electricitydata/rss-comments-entry-10378011.xml</wfw:commentRss><feedburner:origLink>http://www.electricitydata.com/electricitydata/2011/2/6/union-vs-non-union-wages-2000-2010.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Texas Reliability Entity generating capacity margin chart</title><category>Capacity Utilization</category><category>ERCOT</category><category>Texas</category><category>Texas Reliability Entity</category><category>capacity margin</category><category>power generation</category><dc:creator>ed</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 05 Feb 2011 02:20:29 +0000</pubDate><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/electricitydata/tXdH/~3/4JynYQ_37k0/texas-reliability-entity-generating-capacity-margin-chart.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">454334:6180712:10360117</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Power generators in Texas have come under criticism this week over the possibility of buying power from Mexico to meet high consumer demands because of extreme winter weather.&amp;nbsp; However, power suppliers have been able to meet those demands for the most part.&amp;nbsp; Below is chart of the demand and capacity resources in the region.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The &lt;a href="http://www.texasre.org/Pages/Default.aspx"&gt;Texas Reliability Entity&lt;/a&gt; (TRE) ensure the reliability of the bulk power system in the Electric Reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT) region.&amp;nbsp; TRE serves 85% of the Texas load and 75% of the Texas land mass.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span class="full-image-block ssNonEditable"&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;img style="width: 630px;" src="http://www.electricitydata.com/storage/Texas%20Regional%20Entity%20Capacity-Demand-Capacity%20Margin.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1296872102324" alt="" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The chart plots consumer demand and capacity resources in megawatts.&amp;nbsp; The difference between the two, called capacity margin, is reserve generating capacity utilized during extreme winter and summer peak loads.&amp;nbsp; While having a large reserve is desirable in extreme conditions, idle capacity is costly.&amp;nbsp; Power generators have to balance the trade off, maintaining just enough reserve capacity to meet emergencies but not over building the system.&amp;nbsp; Note the difference between the blue and green columns.&amp;nbsp; TRE systems maintains a certain percentage of excess generating capacity over consumer demand.&amp;nbsp; This capacity margin is represented by the red line, expressed in percent on the right.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Data &lt;span&gt;Source&lt;/span&gt;: &lt;a href="http://www.eia.doe.gov/cneaf/electricity/epa/epat4p2.html"&gt;U.S. Energy Information Administration&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Related Article: &lt;a href="http://www.electricitydata.com/electricitydata/2011/2/4/number-new-power-plants-down-in-2009-capacity-up.html"&gt;Number of new power plants down in 2009, capacity up&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/electricitydata/tXdH/~4/4JynYQ_37k0" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.electricitydata.com/electricitydata/rss-comments-entry-10360117.xml</wfw:commentRss><feedburner:origLink>http://www.electricitydata.com/electricitydata/2011/2/4/texas-reliability-entity-generating-capacity-margin-chart.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Number new power plants down in 2009, capacity up</title><category>capacity</category><category>coal</category><category>natural gas</category><category>petroleum</category><category>power generation</category><dc:creator>ed</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2011 18:43:30 +0000</pubDate><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/electricitydata/tXdH/~3/3cRKRk0B8vc/number-new-power-plants-down-in-2009-capacity-up.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">454334:6180712:10355580</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Extreme cold temperatures in the southwestern U.S. is raising concerns over available power generating capacity as some power companies were forced implemented rolling blackouts (&lt;a href="http://www.elpasotimes.com/news/ci_17288641"&gt;link&lt;/a&gt;....&lt;a href="http://www.platts.com/RSSFeedDetailedNews/RSSFeed/ElectricPower/6807305"&gt;link&lt;/a&gt;...&lt;a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ac/20110204/tr_ac/7777062_houston_experiences_power_outages_rolling_blackouts_during_winter_storm"&gt;link&lt;/a&gt;).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Here's a look at the data.&amp;nbsp; The number of power plants retired in 2009 exceeded the number of new plants built, according to the &lt;a href="http://www.eia.doe.gov/cneaf/electricity/epa/epat1p5.html"&gt;latest data&lt;/a&gt; available from the U.S. Energy Information Administration.&amp;nbsp; The November 2010 data shows 114 power plants built in 2009 and 132 retired.&amp;nbsp; New and retired coal, petroleum, and gas power plants are charted below.&amp;nbsp; Not charted, but important to the mix now, is the addition of 120 wind generating plants built in 2009, which exceeds the total number of new coal, petroleum, and gas plants combined.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span class="full-image-block ssNonEditable"&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;img style="width: 600px;" src="http://www.electricitydata.com/storage/2009 Power Plant Additions and Retirements.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1296865057088" alt="" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As far as generating capacity, the additional (new) plants in the above chart represent an increase of 12,874 megawatts and retirements represent 7,100 megawatts, for a net gain of 5,774 megawatts in 2009.&amp;nbsp; With the added generating capacity from wind, another 9,581 megawatts, and other sources, generating capacity increased by 23,144 megawatts in 2009.&amp;nbsp; Retirements accounts for 7,249 megawatts, providing a net increase of 15,895 megawatts to the nations power system.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span class="full-image-block ssNonEditable"&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;img style="width: 600px;" src="http://www.electricitydata.com/storage/2009 Power Plant Capacity Additions and Retirements.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1296865136429" alt="" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/electricitydata/tXdH/~4/3cRKRk0B8vc" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.electricitydata.com/electricitydata/rss-comments-entry-10355580.xml</wfw:commentRss><feedburner:origLink>http://www.electricitydata.com/electricitydata/2011/2/4/number-new-power-plants-down-in-2009-capacity-up.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Utility unemployment rates falls to 3.4% in January 2011</title><category>Economic Indicator</category><category>Unemployment Rate</category><category>unemployment</category><category>utility unemployment</category><dc:creator>ed</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2011 13:52:02 +0000</pubDate><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/electricitydata/tXdH/~3/iHyNG9ksVOs/utility-unemployment-rates-falls-to-34-in-january-2011.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">454334:6180712:10351951</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;The unemployment rate in utilities fell to 3.4% in January 2011, down from 4.2% the previous month, according to data release by the Bureau of Labor Statistics today.&amp;nbsp; The rate is also a significant improvement upon the previous to years when January 2010 and January 2009 recorded unemployment rates of 4.2% and 6.3%, respectively.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span class="full-image-block ssNonEditable"&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;img style="width: 600px;" src="http://www.electricitydata.com/storage/Jan 2011 Unemployment rate.gif?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1296828075150" alt="" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Nationally, the utility sector is doing far better than the overall economy.&amp;nbsp; The U.S. unemployment rate fell from 9.4% in December to 9.0% in January, remaining well above the utility sector's 3.4% rate.&amp;nbsp; While the lower unemployment rate is welcoming news for the nation, the reduction is attributed to workers who quit looking for a job.&amp;nbsp; Only 36,000 new jobs were created in January, while 600,000 gave up looking.&amp;nbsp; When workers job out of the labor force, they are no longer counted as unemployed.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/electricitydata/tXdH/~4/iHyNG9ksVOs" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.electricitydata.com/electricitydata/rss-comments-entry-10351951.xml</wfw:commentRss><feedburner:origLink>http://www.electricitydata.com/electricitydata/2011/2/4/utility-unemployment-rates-falls-to-34-in-january-2011.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Union membership in utilities increases 8.4%, wages up 7.1% in 2010</title><category>Electric Power Industry</category><category>labor cost</category><category>non-union</category><category>union membership</category><category>wages</category><dc:creator>ed</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 02 Feb 2011 22:06:24 +0000</pubDate><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/electricitydata/tXdH/~3/9Zyn_feaAQc/union-membership-in-utilities-increases-84-wages-up-71-in-20.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">454334:6180712:10335181</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Union membership in U.S. utilities increased 8.4% in 2010 over the previous year, says the Bureau of Labor Statistics &lt;a href="http://www.bls.gov/news.release/pdf/union2.pdf"&gt;latest report&lt;/a&gt; (see below) on union membership released January 21, 2011. The data does not breakdown membership among the various utility segments.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Union membership climbed from 237,000 in 2009 to 257,00 in 2010 (Table 3 BLS 2010 Union Membership Report), while total employment in utilities rose from 906,000 to 909,000 during the same period.&amp;nbsp; Union members now comprise 28.3% of the utility workforce, up from 26.1% in 2009.&amp;nbsp; When the total number of employee represented by unions are counted, the percentage of union representation is even higher.&amp;nbsp; In 2010, 30.3% of all utility employees were represented by unions compared to 28.3% in 2009.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Utility employees are bucking the national trend.&amp;nbsp; Union membership nationally declined last year by 612,000.&amp;nbsp; Nationally, 14.7 million workers were union members, representing 11.9% of the workforce, down from 12.3% in 2009.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;At over 30 percent unionization, the utility workforce closely resembles the public sector and ranks as the highest rate of unionization among all industries in the private sector.&amp;nbsp; The public sector workforce is substantially more unionized than the private sector, 36.2% compared to 6.9% in 2010.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For utilities with high union membership wishing to control labor costs, think again.&amp;nbsp; Annual wages for union members increased 7.1% in 2010 compared with only 0.6% for non-union members (Table 4).&amp;nbsp; Wages for union workers continue to outpace their non-union counterparts.&amp;nbsp; The union wage premium (union wages compared to non-union wages) was 11.1% in 2009 and 18.2% in 2010.&amp;nbsp; In other words, union member wages were 18.2% higher than non-union wages in 2010.&amp;nbsp; Looking from the other side of the coin, the non-union wage discount was 10% in 2009 and 15.4% in 2010.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;object style="width:600px;height:388px" &gt;&lt;param name="movie" value="http://static.issuu.com/webembed/viewers/style1/v1/IssuuViewer.swf?mode=embed&amp;amp;layout=http%3A%2F%2Fskin.issuu.com%2Fv%2Flight%2Flayout.xml&amp;amp;showFlipBtn=true&amp;amp;documentId=110202203820-381685bc01dc47a194e2301483ca9013&amp;amp;docName=report_2010_-&amp;amp;username=electricitydata&amp;amp;loadingInfoText=Union%20membership%202010&amp;amp;et=1296683500240&amp;amp;er=8" /&gt;&lt;param name="allowfullscreen" value="true"/&gt;&lt;param name="menu" value="false"/&gt;&lt;embed src="http://static.issuu.com/webembed/viewers/style1/v1/IssuuViewer.swf" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" menu="false" style="width:600px;height:388px" flashvars="mode=embed&amp;amp;layout=http%3A%2F%2Fskin.issuu.com%2Fv%2Flight%2Flayout.xml&amp;amp;showFlipBtn=true&amp;amp;documentId=110202203820-381685bc01dc47a194e2301483ca9013&amp;amp;docName=union_membership_report_2010_-&amp;amp;username=electricitydata&amp;amp;loadingInfoText=Union%20membership%202010&amp;amp;et=1296683500240&amp;amp;er=8" /&gt;&lt;/object&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;object style="width:600px;height:464px" &gt;&lt;param name="movie" value="http://static.issuu.com/webembed/viewers/style1/v1/IssuuViewer.swf?mode=embed&amp;amp;viewMode=presentation&amp;amp;layout=http%3A%2F%2Fskin.issuu.com%2Fv%2Flight%2Flayout.xml&amp;amp;showFlipBtn=true&amp;amp;documentId=110202233003-55fe7ce0e03842859a81beebd71f663d&amp;amp;docName=_-_2000-2010&amp;amp;username=electricitydata&amp;amp;loadingInfoText=Union%20Membership%20US%20Utilities%202000-2010&amp;amp;et=1296689466242&amp;amp;er=78" /&gt;&lt;param name="allowfullscreen" value="true"/&gt;&lt;param name="menu" value="false"/&gt;&lt;embed src="http://static.issuu.com/webembed/viewers/style1/v1/IssuuViewer.swf" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" menu="false" style="width:600px;height:464px" flashvars="mode=embed&amp;amp;viewMode=presentation&amp;amp;layout=http%3A%2F%2Fskin.issuu.com%2Fv%2Flight%2Flayout.xml&amp;amp;showFlipBtn=true&amp;amp;documentId=110202233003-55fe7ce0e03842859a81beebd71f663d&amp;amp;docName=union_membership_-_2000-2010&amp;amp;username=electricitydata&amp;amp;loadingInfoText=Union%20Membership%20US%20Utilities%202000-2010&amp;amp;et=1296689466242&amp;amp;er=78" /&gt;&lt;/object&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/electricitydata/tXdH/~4/9Zyn_feaAQc" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.electricitydata.com/electricitydata/rss-comments-entry-10335181.xml</wfw:commentRss><feedburner:origLink>http://www.electricitydata.com/electricitydata/2011/2/2/union-membership-in-utilities-increases-84-wages-up-71-in-20.html</feedburner:origLink></item></channel></rss>

