<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Digital-Traffic.net</title>
	
	<link>http://digital-traffic.net</link>
	<description>Public thoughts of a network administrator</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 20:20:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/digital-traffic_comments" /><feedburner:info uri="digital-traffic_comments" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><feedburner:browserFriendly></feedburner:browserFriendly><item>
		<title>Comment on Formatting byte values in Excel 2007 by Delroy</title>
		<link>http://digital-traffic.net/technology/formatting-byte-values-in-excel-2007/comment-page-1#comment-410</link>
		<dc:creator>Delroy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 20:20:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-traffic.net/?p=132#comment-410</guid>
		<description>Thank You Very Much.

How did you handle numbers less than 1 and less than zero (Negative Numbers)?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank You Very Much.</p>
<p>How did you handle numbers less than 1 and less than zero (Negative Numbers)?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Implementing IPv6 at home—part 2 by Martijn Heemels</title>
		<link>http://digital-traffic.net/technology/implementing-ipv6-at-home-part-2/comment-page-1#comment-384</link>
		<dc:creator>Martijn Heemels</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Feb 2011 11:54:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-traffic.net/?p=242#comment-384</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href="#comment-304" rel="nofollow"&gt;@Brian Shacklett&lt;/a&gt; 
Thanks for the info. With these tips, and a bit of trial and error, I managed to get it working too.

Since ASA firmware 8.3 now supports forwarding proto-41, I'm terminating the tunnel on a Linux VM that is physically inside the firewall. The VM runs on our VMware ESXi infrastructure, and is connected by an IPv4 interface to our inside VLAN, and by an IPv6-only interface to the 'outside' VLAN on the ASA 5505. So, I've combined v4 and v6 like your suggested.

SixXS routes my /32 subnet through the tunnel, and I route the entire /32 to the Cisco ASA. The ASA routes and advertises a separate /64 to each VLAN.

It would have been a lot easier if the ASA just supported creating 6in4 tunnels but my VM &amp; VLAN solution has allowed me to set all this up without any investment in hardware. Just some spare vSphere capacity and (a lot of) time. Of course the design is relatively complex, so documentation is a must. I'll keep pushing my ISP for native IPv6. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-304" rel="nofollow">@Brian Shacklett</a><br />
Thanks for the info. With these tips, and a bit of trial and error, I managed to get it working too.</p>
<p>Since ASA firmware 8.3 now supports forwarding proto-41, I&#8217;m terminating the tunnel on a Linux VM that is physically inside the firewall. The VM runs on our VMware ESXi infrastructure, and is connected by an IPv4 interface to our inside VLAN, and by an IPv6-only interface to the &#8216;outside&#8217; VLAN on the ASA 5505. So, I&#8217;ve combined v4 and v6 like your suggested.</p>
<p>SixXS routes my /32 subnet through the tunnel, and I route the entire /32 to the Cisco ASA. The ASA routes and advertises a separate /64 to each VLAN.</p>
<p>It would have been a lot easier if the ASA just supported creating 6in4 tunnels but my VM &amp; VLAN solution has allowed me to set all this up without any investment in hardware. Just some spare vSphere capacity and (a lot of) time. Of course the design is relatively complex, so documentation is a must. I&#8217;ll keep pushing my ISP for native IPv6. <img src='http://digital-traffic.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Implementing IPv6 at home—part 2 by Brian Shacklett</title>
		<link>http://digital-traffic.net/technology/implementing-ipv6-at-home-part-2/comment-page-1#comment-324</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Shacklett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Nov 2010 22:00:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-traffic.net/?p=242#comment-324</guid>
		<description>What would the v4 addressing/routing look like in this case?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What would the v4 addressing/routing look like in this case?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Implementing IPv6 at home—part 2 by Antillie</title>
		<link>http://digital-traffic.net/technology/implementing-ipv6-at-home-part-2/comment-page-1#comment-320</link>
		<dc:creator>Antillie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Aug 2010 21:18:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-traffic.net/?p=242#comment-320</guid>
		<description>Using an ASA and a Cisco router together for dual stack IPv4/IPv6 connectivity via a tunnel to Hurricane Electric is actually quite easy. You just put the router in front of the ASA and terminate the tunnel there. Then let the ASA filter everything comming from the router bound for your network.

I did this myself with a 2621xm and an ASA 5505. To avoid having to resatatize my configs I'll just link to another post I made about how to do this:

http://www.tunnelbroker.net/forums/index.php?topic=356.0

Basically you use some /64's from the /48 that Hurricane Electric gives you to create networks behind your router. In my case one network to link the ASA and the router and then two more behind the ASA. Since the ASA can't do dynamic routing protocols like OSPF in IPv6 you need to use static routes to point your /64 networks to the ASA on the router and to make the router the ASA's default IPv6 gateway. (Ok you could use auto config to make the router the ASA's gateway but I like to keep things uniform.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Using an ASA and a Cisco router together for dual stack IPv4/IPv6 connectivity via a tunnel to Hurricane Electric is actually quite easy. You just put the router in front of the ASA and terminate the tunnel there. Then let the ASA filter everything comming from the router bound for your network.</p>
<p>I did this myself with a 2621xm and an ASA 5505. To avoid having to resatatize my configs I&#8217;ll just link to another post I made about how to do this:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.tunnelbroker.net/forums/index.php?topic=356.0" rel="nofollow">http://www.tunnelbroker.net/forums/index.php?topic=356.0</a></p>
<p>Basically you use some /64&#8242;s from the /48 that Hurricane Electric gives you to create networks behind your router. In my case one network to link the ASA and the router and then two more behind the ASA. Since the ASA can&#8217;t do dynamic routing protocols like OSPF in IPv6 you need to use static routes to point your /64 networks to the ASA on the router and to make the router the ASA&#8217;s default IPv6 gateway. (Ok you could use auto config to make the router the ASA&#8217;s gateway but I like to keep things uniform.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Implementing IPv6 at home—part 2 by Brian Shacklett</title>
		<link>http://digital-traffic.net/technology/implementing-ipv6-at-home-part-2/comment-page-1#comment-304</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Shacklett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 23:58:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-traffic.net/?p=242#comment-304</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href="#comment-303" rel="nofollow"&gt;@Martijn Heemels&lt;/a&gt; 
My ASA has 3 VLans at present. Vlan10 is the inside network. Vlan20 is the IPv4 outside network and Vlan30 is the IPv6 outside network. The Linux server that is terminating the tunnel on my side has two interfaces. eth0 is the v6 interface, which is connected to a Vlan30 interface on the ASA. eth1 is the v4 interface, which is connected to the inside network.

As far as I understand, the segregation of the v4 outside and v6 outside VLans is unnecessary. I'll likely be moving the v6 address on the ASA to VLan20.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-303" rel="nofollow">@Martijn Heemels</a><br />
My ASA has 3 VLans at present. Vlan10 is the inside network. Vlan20 is the IPv4 outside network and Vlan30 is the IPv6 outside network. The Linux server that is terminating the tunnel on my side has two interfaces. eth0 is the v6 interface, which is connected to a Vlan30 interface on the ASA. eth1 is the v4 interface, which is connected to the inside network.</p>
<p>As far as I understand, the segregation of the v4 outside and v6 outside VLans is unnecessary. I&#8217;ll likely be moving the v6 address on the ASA to VLan20.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Implementing IPv6 at home—part 2 by Martijn Heemels</title>
		<link>http://digital-traffic.net/technology/implementing-ipv6-at-home-part-2/comment-page-1#comment-303</link>
		<dc:creator>Martijn Heemels</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 15:08:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-traffic.net/?p=242#comment-303</guid>
		<description>Interesting article. At my company I'm currently using a SixXs tunnel from a linux server. Due to a network redesign we've ordered an ASA5505 firewall, so I'm now wondering how to setup the IPv6 tunnel, while still using the ASA to firewall v4 and v6 traffic.

Where is your tunnel endpoint located? In a DMZ? I would love to see a diagram or description of your network layout.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting article. At my company I&#8217;m currently using a SixXs tunnel from a linux server. Due to a network redesign we&#8217;ve ordered an ASA5505 firewall, so I&#8217;m now wondering how to setup the IPv6 tunnel, while still using the ASA to firewall v4 and v6 traffic.</p>
<p>Where is your tunnel endpoint located? In a DMZ? I would love to see a diagram or description of your network layout.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Implementing IPv6 at home—part 2 by macbroadcast</title>
		<link>http://digital-traffic.net/technology/implementing-ipv6-at-home-part-2/comment-page-1#comment-302</link>
		<dc:creator>macbroadcast</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 23:39:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-traffic.net/?p=242#comment-302</guid>
		<description>[...and lost money with open source firmware and Linksys routers....]

oh yes i hear ya, i Â´ve bricked 3 of them :(

rock on
macbroadcast.org</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...and lost money with open source firmware and Linksys routers....]</p>
<p>oh yes i hear ya, i Â´ve bricked 3 of them <img src='http://digital-traffic.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>rock on<br />
macbroadcast.org</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Implementing IPv6 At Home – Part 1 by Digital-Traffic.net » Implementing IPv6 at homeâ€”part 2</title>
		<link>http://digital-traffic.net/technology/implementing-ipv6-at-home-part-1/comment-page-1#comment-301</link>
		<dc:creator>Digital-Traffic.net » Implementing IPv6 at homeâ€”part 2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 20:58:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-traffic.net/?p=40#comment-301</guid>
		<description>[...] while back I did some experimentation with IPv6 on my Cisco 2611xm. I was using a tunnel provided by Hurricane Electric, which worked [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] while back I did some experimentation with IPv6 on my Cisco 2611xm. I was using a tunnel provided by Hurricane Electric, which worked [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Remote server administration with Windows Vista by WindowsObserver.com » Windows Vista Google Alerts for 27 April 2009</title>
		<link>http://digital-traffic.net/technology/remote-server-administration-with-windows-vista/comment-page-1#comment-252</link>
		<dc:creator>WindowsObserver.com » Windows Vista Google Alerts for 27 April 2009</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 08:49:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-traffic.net/?p=113#comment-252</guid>
		<description>[...] Digital-Traffic.net Â» Remote server administration with Windows Vista By Brian Shacklett Remote server administration with Windows Vista. April 26th, 2009. Goto comments Leave a comment. If you’re a systems administrator and run Vista, you might have run into some trouble with the server 2003 administration tools package … Digital-Traffic.net - http://digital-traffic.net/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Digital-Traffic.net Â» Remote server administration with Windows Vista By Brian Shacklett Remote server administration with Windows Vista. April 26th, 2009. Goto comments Leave a comment. If you&#8217;re a systems administrator and run Vista, you might have run into some trouble with the server 2003 administration tools package &#8230; Digital-Traffic.net &#8211; <a href="http://digital-traffic.net/" rel="nofollow">http://digital-traffic.net/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on SpamAssassin: Dealing with unrecognized spam by Antispam Software Blogg</title>
		<link>http://digital-traffic.net/technology/spamassassin-dealing-with-unrecognized-spam/comment-page-1#comment-43</link>
		<dc:creator>Antispam Software Blogg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jan 2009 04:51:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-traffic.net/blog/?p=25#comment-43</guid>
		<description>[...] Digital-Traffic.net Â» SpamAssassin: Dealing with unrecognized spam [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Digital-Traffic.net Â» SpamAssassin: Dealing with unrecognized spam [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

