<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="no"?><rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Defense Forum at DefenceTalk.com</title>
    <description>Global Defense forum, discuss topics on air force, army, navy, missiles and global military news updates in internet's most professional defence forum.</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2026 13:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2026 13:02:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>Defence Forum &amp; Military Photos - DefenceTalk</generator>
    <link>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/</link>
    <atom:link href="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/-/index.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Middle East Defence &amp; Security</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2026 12:52:09 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/middle-east-defence-security.13210/</link>
      <guid>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/middle-east-defence-security.13210/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (MaenZ)</author>
      <category domain="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/geostrategic-issues.47/"><![CDATA[Geostrategic Issues]]></category>
      <dc:creator>MaenZ</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="bbWrapper">It's funny to call this a crisis because we have always been at war.<br />
<br />
Anyway, Does you have any strategic insight to share about the growing ISIL threat in the region?<br />
<br />
I'm particularly interested with Jordanian defense capability against the group. As voices inside Jordan claim that ISIL cannot possibly break into Jordanian defenses. However outside neutral sources claim that Jordan cannot handle ISIL on it's own.<br />
<br />
Jordan is claimed to be the best trained Arab fighting force on the...<br />
<br />
<a href="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/middle-east-defence-security.13210/" class="link link--internal">Middle East Defence &amp; Security</a></div>]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>2002</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Royal Australian Navy Discussions and Updates 2.0</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2026 12:50:14 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/royal-australian-navy-discussions-and-updates-2-0.15429/</link>
      <guid>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/royal-australian-navy-discussions-and-updates-2-0.15429/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (OPSSG)</author>
      <category domain="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/navy-maritime.22/"><![CDATA[Navy & Maritime]]></category>
      <dc:creator>OPSSG</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="bbWrapper"><b><span style="color: rgb(65, 168, 95)">1.  This Royal Australian Navy Discussions and Updates 2.0 thread is a continuation of the</span> </b><a href="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/royal-australian-navy-discussions-and-updates.5905/" class="link link--internal"><b>older thread</b></a><b> <span style="color: rgb(65, 168, 95)">(starting 20 Nov 2021).  <b>The older RAN thread at 1,500+ pages is a bit too long and further discussions should continue here. Some prior posts before this was moved here from the RAN thread to seed future...</b></span></b><br />
<br />
<a href="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/royal-australian-navy-discussions-and-updates-2-0.15429/" class="link link--internal">Royal Australian Navy Discussions and Updates 2.0</a></div>]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>15216</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Indonesian Aero News</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2026 10:09:28 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/indonesian-aero-news.9220/</link>
      <guid>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/indonesian-aero-news.9220/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (Ananda)</author>
      <category domain="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/air-force-aviation.20/"><![CDATA[Air Force & Aviation]]></category>
      <dc:creator>Ananda</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="bbWrapper"><a href="http://newspaper.pikiran-rakyat.com/prprint.php?mib=beritadetail&amp;id=81605" target="_blank" class="link link--external" rel="nofollow noopener">PIKIRAN RAKYAT - PT DI Akan Produksi Pesawat Amfibi</a><br />
<br />
I'm sorry the link is in local newspaper, but in short it's said that the Indonesian Aerospaces (PT. DI) will build (under license) with Dornier a light amphibious plane.<br />
<br />
The DI spokesman says the plane will have capacities for 14 passanger (outside the pilot) and have two engines.<br />
Try to find the info in dornier site, still has not find the relevant...<br />
<br />
<a href="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/indonesian-aero-news.9220/" class="link link--internal">Indonesian Aero News</a></div>]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>3708</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Royal New Zealand Navy Discussions and Updates</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2026 09:52:24 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/royal-new-zealand-navy-discussions-and-updates.4854/</link>
      <guid>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/royal-new-zealand-navy-discussions-and-updates.4854/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (Padman)</author>
      <category domain="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/navy-maritime.22/"><![CDATA[Navy & Maritime]]></category>
      <dc:creator>Padman</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="bbWrapper">Protector Update<br />
The Navy’s new Multi-Role Vessel (pictured right), to be named CANTERBURY, has a vehicle capacity for up to 40 NZLAVs (the Army’s new armoured fighting vehicle) along with an embarked force of up to 250 personnel.<br />
<br />
The MRV’s commercial design heritage provides a comfortable and flexible level of accommodation for the embarked force, utilising a series of 12 berth cabins (four sets of bunks three deep) which are located in the superstructure on the same level as the flight...<br />
<br />
<a href="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/royal-new-zealand-navy-discussions-and-updates.4854/" class="link link--internal">Royal New Zealand Navy Discussions and Updates</a></div>]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>9932</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Vietnam People's Navy</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2026 07:01:50 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/vietnam-peoples-navy.16059/</link>
      <guid>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/vietnam-peoples-navy.16059/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (koxinga)</author>
      <category domain="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/navy-maritime.22/"><![CDATA[Navy & Maritime]]></category>
      <dc:creator>koxinga</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="bbWrapper">Given their growing capabilities, especially indigenously, Vietnam warrants having their own discussion thread.</div>]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Royal Australian Air Force [RAAF] News, Discussions and Updates</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2026 05:07:29 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/royal-australian-air-force-raaf-news-discussions-and-updates.6007/</link>
      <guid>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/royal-australian-air-force-raaf-news-discussions-and-updates.6007/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (Todjaeger)</author>
      <category domain="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/air-force-aviation.20/"><![CDATA[Air Force & Aviation]]></category>
      <dc:creator>Todjaeger</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="bbWrapper">Thought I'd start a general RAAF thread, since many of the existing ones end up shifting back and forth despite the initial start of the topic.  That and I have a question that doesn't quite seem to pertain to any active thread at present.<br />
<br />
Currently the Project Wedgetail (AIR 5077) for the E-737 is ongoing but behind 18+ months.  Delivery from what I've last read is now expected in early 2010, although some are already in Australia.  As part of the program, 4 were ordered, with options...<br />
<br />
<a href="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/royal-australian-air-force-raaf-news-discussions-and-updates.6007/" class="link link--internal">Royal Australian Air Force [RAAF] News, Discussions and Updates</a></div>]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>10546</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Indonesia:  'green water navy'</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2026 03:16:25 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/indonesia-green-water-navy.3897/</link>
      <guid>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/indonesia-green-water-navy.3897/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (Supe)</author>
      <category domain="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/navy-maritime.22/"><![CDATA[Navy & Maritime]]></category>
      <dc:creator>Supe</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="bbWrapper">After reading this (quite interesting) <a href="http://www.strategypage.com/messageboards/messages/512-12402.asp" target="_blank" class="link link--external" rel="nofollow noopener"> thread</a> on Indonesian aspirations for a 'green water navy' , it left me wondering about the capabilities of the Indonesian Navy as it stands now and the direction it wants to take. <a href="http://www.hazegray.org/worldnav/asiapac/indones.htm" target="_blank" class="link link--external" rel="nofollow noopener">World Navies today</a> website  lists quite a few assets, particularly of amphibious ships. It looks like they have a decent amphibious...<br />
<br />
<a href="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/indonesia-green-water-navy.3897/" class="link link--internal">Indonesia:  'green water navy'</a></div>]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>3604</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>New Chinese Space Plane</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2026 00:57:44 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/new-chinese-space-plane.15111/</link>
      <guid>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/new-chinese-space-plane.15111/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (John Fedup)</author>
      <category domain="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/space-technology.32/"><![CDATA[Space Technology]]></category>
      <dc:creator>John Fedup</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="bbWrapper">It appears that China may have something similar to the US X-37B.  Sort of explains the push for America’s Space Force if intelligence sources knew about this launch for sometime.<br />
<br />

	

	<div class="bbCodeBlock bbCodeBlock--unfurl    js-unfurl fauxBlockLink"
		data-unfurl="true" data-result-id="2492" data-url="https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/36202/u-s-confirms-china-has-launched-what-could-be-its-version-of-x-37b-spaceplane" data-host="www.thedrive.com" data-pending="false">
		<div class="contentRow">
			
				<div class="contentRow-figure contentRow-figure--fixedSmall js-unfurl-figure">
					
						<img src="https://thedrive.com/content/2020/09/spaceplane-top.jpg?quality=85&amp;w=1200" alt="www.thedrive.com" data-onerror="hide-parent"/>
					
				</div>
			
			<div class="contentRow-main">
				<h3 class="contentRow-header js-unfurl-title">
					<a href="https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/36202/u-s-confirms-china-has-launched-what-could-be-its-version-of-x-37b-spaceplane"
						class="link link--external fauxBlockLink-blockLink"
						target="_blank"
						rel="nofollow noopener"
						data-proxy-href="">
						U.S. Confirms China Has Launched What Could Be Its Version Of The X-37B Spaceplane
					</a>
				</h3>

				<div class="contentRow-snippet js-unfurl-desc">The reusable experimental spacecraft was launched into space on a secret mission from Inner Mongolia earlier today.</div>

				<div class="contentRow-minor contentRow-minor--hideLinks">
					<span class="js-unfurl-favicon">
						
							<img src="https://www.twz.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/30/TWZ_Favicon.png?quality=85&amp;w=32" alt="www.thedrive.com" class="bbCodeBlockUnfurl-icon"
								data-onerror="hide-parent"/>
						
					</span>
					www.thedrive.com
				</div>
			</div>
		</div>
	</div></div>]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Russian-Ukrainian War Thread</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2026 22:38:48 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/the-russian-ukrainian-war-thread.15283/</link>
      <guid>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/the-russian-ukrainian-war-thread.15283/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (Feanor)</author>
      <category domain="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/geostrategic-issues.47/"><![CDATA[Geostrategic Issues]]></category>
      <dc:creator>Feanor</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="bbWrapper">I tried looking for the last one of these we had but it seems to be buried pretty deep, so I'll start a new one. This is a catchall thread for the ongoing military and geo-strategic stalemate in eastern Ukraine.<br />
<br />
As of late there have been increasing indicators that something might be brewing. Mostly pro-Russian sources have been pointing out increasing movements of Ukrainian troops, including armor, towards the front line. Now there are indications of rearmament of frontline units with...<br />
<br />
<a href="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/the-russian-ukrainian-war-thread.15283/" class="link link--internal">The Russian-Ukrainian War Thread</a></div>]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>14867</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Germany</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2026 11:58:27 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/germany.14063/</link>
      <guid>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/germany.14063/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (gf0012-aust)</author>
      <category domain="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/geostrategic-issues.47/"><![CDATA[Geostrategic Issues]]></category>
      <dc:creator>gf0012-aust</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="bbWrapper">catchall thread for Germany</div>]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>367</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>NZDF General discussion thread</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2026 11:55:54 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/nzdf-general-discussion-thread.6137/</link>
      <guid>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/nzdf-general-discussion-thread.6137/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (NZLAV)</author>
      <category domain="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/geostrategic-issues.47/"><![CDATA[Geostrategic Issues]]></category>
      <dc:creator>NZLAV</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="bbWrapper">If a new government came into power in New Zealand and had the vision of making New Zealand a regional power, what could they to to make this happen?<br />
<br />
New Zealand's army is very well trained as in equipt with modern weapon such as:<br />
<br />
<u>Armoured Vehicles</u><br />
<br />
105 x NZ Light Armoured Vehicle (NZLAV) <br />
352x Pinzgauer Light Operational Vehicle (LOV) <br />
<br />
<u>Missile Systems</u><br />
<br />
12 x Mistral anti-aircraft missile <br />
24 x Javelin Anti-Tank Guided Missile (ATGM) launchers <br />
<br />
<u>Support...</u><br />
<br />
<a href="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/nzdf-general-discussion-thread.6137/" class="link link--internal">NZDF General discussion thread</a></div>]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>9323</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>6th Generation Fighters Projects</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 20:33:01 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/6th-generation-fighters-projects.15234/</link>
      <guid>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/6th-generation-fighters-projects.15234/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (Sandhi Yudha)</author>
      <category domain="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/air-force-aviation.20/"><![CDATA[Air Force & Aviation]]></category>
      <dc:creator>Sandhi Yudha</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="bbWrapper">If i'm not wrong there isn't a thread yet for new and future 5,5th and 6th generation fighterjet programs, so lets start one.<br />
<br />




<blockquote class="bbCodeBlock bbCodeBlock--expandable bbCodeBlock--quote">
	
	<div class="bbCodeBlock-content">
		
		<div class="bbCodeBlock-expandContent ">
			The sixth-generation jet — planned by the U.K., Sweden and Italy and set to enter service after 2030 — will bristle with new technology, from its weaponry and propulsion to a virtual cockpit projected inside the pilot’s helmet.<br />
<br />
But the group set the bar high in October by announcing the fighter’s radar would process a quantity of data equivalent to nine...
		</div>
		<div class="bbCodeBlock-expandLink"><a>Click to expand...</a></div>
	</div>
</blockquote><a href="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/6th-generation-fighters-projects.15234/" class="link link--internal">6th Generation Fighters Projects</a></div>]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>381</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>German Navy</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 19:12:50 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/german-navy.13997/</link>
      <guid>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/german-navy.13997/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (gf0012-aust)</author>
      <category domain="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/navy-maritime.22/"><![CDATA[Navy & Maritime]]></category>
      <dc:creator>gf0012-aust</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="bbWrapper">catch all thread</div>]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>509</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Royal Canadian Air Force (RCAF) News and Discussions</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 10:34:34 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/royal-canadian-air-force-rcaf-news-and-discussions.13518/</link>
      <guid>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/royal-canadian-air-force-rcaf-news-and-discussions.13518/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (John Fedup)</author>
      <category domain="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/air-force-aviation.20/"><![CDATA[Air Force & Aviation]]></category>
      <dc:creator>John Fedup</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="bbWrapper">As there seems to be no RCAF thread, I will start one.  Today's Ottawa Citizen is reporting the RCAF is looking at a combination of Predators and Avengers to meet Canada's drone needs.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://ottawacitizen.com/news/national/defence-watch/a-predator-c-avenger-drone-for-the-rcaf" target="_blank" class="link link--external" rel="nofollow noopener">A Predator C Avenger drone for the RCAF? | Ottawa Citizen</a><br />
<br />
<span style="color: DarkRed"><b>Mod edit: Fixed thread title.<br />
-Preceptor</b></span></div>]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>2137</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Australian Army Discussions and Updates</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2026 21:01:10 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/australian-army-discussions-and-updates.5526/</link>
      <guid>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/australian-army-discussions-and-updates.5526/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (mickk)</author>
      <category domain="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/army-security-forces.21/"><![CDATA[Army & Security Forces]]></category>
      <dc:creator>mickk</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="bbWrapper">James Button, London<br />
November 24, 2006<br />
<br />


	
	
		
		
	


	<div class="lbContainer lbContainer--inline " title=""
		data-xf-init="lightbox"
		data-lb-single-image="1"
		data-lb-container-zoom="1"
		data-lb-trigger=".js-lbImage-_xfUid-1-1783774920"
		data-lb-id="_xfUid-1-1783774920">
		
			<div class="lbContainer-zoomer js-lbImage-_xfUid-1-1783774920" data-src="http://i10.tinypic.com/2heeouc.jpg" aria-label="Zoom"></div>
		
		<img src="http://i10.tinypic.com/2heeouc.jpg" data-url="http://i10.tinypic.com/2heeouc.jpg" class="bbImage" data-zoom-target="1"  style="" />
	</div>

<br />
<br />
HE REMEMBERS every detail: a massive explosion in the helicopter, a smell of cordite, bullets ricocheting off the walls, his door gunner trying to get a shot at their attackers, and his co-pilot noticing blood pooling in his lap and realising he had been shot through the chest.<br />
<br />
&quot;He was amazing,&quot; Scott Watkins says of his co-pilot that day in Iraq, Keith Reesby, whose heart escaped a bullet by two...<br />
<br />
<a href="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/australian-army-discussions-and-updates.5526/" class="link link--internal">Australian Army Discussions and Updates</a></div>]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>12263</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Royal Navy Discussions and Updates</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2026 18:48:44 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/the-royal-navy-discussions-and-updates.5679/</link>
      <guid>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/the-royal-navy-discussions-and-updates.5679/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (overlander)</author>
      <category domain="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/navy-maritime.22/"><![CDATA[Navy & Maritime]]></category>
      <dc:creator>overlander</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="bbWrapper">RN Year in Review - 2006<br />
...  the lowest priority<br />
<br />
24 December 2006<br />
<br />
Every year since 2000 I have  written an end of year wrap up ... and everyone is more depressing to write and read than the last.  Sadly 2006 is ending on a new low, with precious little good news and rumours of a yet another round of deep cuts getting ever stronger. <br />
<br />
In 2005 we had the Trafalgar bicentenary which at least forced many senior officials of the realm to pay some lip service to the Royal Navy, but 2006 didn't...<br />
<br />
<a href="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/the-royal-navy-discussions-and-updates.5679/" class="link link--internal">The Royal Navy Discussions and Updates</a></div>]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>14164</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Royal Canadian Navy Discussions and updates</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2026 13:09:19 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/royal-canadian-navy-discussions-and-updates.4210/</link>
      <guid>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/royal-canadian-navy-discussions-and-updates.4210/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (stephen weist)</author>
      <category domain="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/navy-maritime.22/"><![CDATA[Navy & Maritime]]></category>
      <dc:creator>stephen weist</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="bbWrapper">The tribals will have to be replaced in the near future, anyone have any thoughts on possible replacements.  I think the replacements should be slightly larger to accomodate the CnC task and also for future upgrades.  I think the anti air/missile capability should be enhanced as the city class frigates could handle the ASW component of any taskforce.  Would six be enough, this would leave on avail on each coast at all times.</div>]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>4126</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Military Aviation News and Discussion</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2026 11:08:38 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/military-aviation-news-and-discussion.13643/</link>
      <guid>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/military-aviation-news-and-discussion.13643/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (ngatimozart)</author>
      <category domain="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/air-force-aviation.20/"><![CDATA[Air Force & Aviation]]></category>
      <dc:creator>ngatimozart</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="bbWrapper">I've started this thread so that military aviation news can be posted and discussed. this is more about the equipment in general rather than placing it in one another air force's and / or navy's thread. This way it isn't repeated or lost. This is <b>not an aircraft vs another aircraft argument thread</b> - see the <a href="http://www.defencetalk.com/forums/air-force-aviation/why-vs-platform-discussions-unproductive-13165/#post280996" class="link link--internal">guidance</a>.</div>]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>1257</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Russian Army/Ground Forces Discussion and Updates</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2026 05:05:33 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/russian-army-ground-forces-discussion-and-updates.13454/</link>
      <guid>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/russian-army-ground-forces-discussion-and-updates.13454/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (Jack Johnson)</author>
      <category domain="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/army-security-forces.21/"><![CDATA[Army & Security Forces]]></category>
      <dc:creator>Jack Johnson</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="bbWrapper"><b>Russian Tank development - did I get it right?</b><br />
<br />
I have some problems understanding the russian tank development...Thats how I think it goes:<br />
<br />
(1) First T-54, T-55 and T-62 as mediocre, but reliable and mass produced tanks.<br />
<br />
(2) After that, a policy of two tanks at the same time, a high quality one and a cheap mass produced one. The high quality tank is the T-64, the mass produced one the T-72<br />
<br />
(3) The T-64 gets replaced by the T-80, the T-72 is still kept in service because he...<br />
<br />
<a href="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/russian-army-ground-forces-discussion-and-updates.13454/" class="link link--internal">Russian Army/Ground Forces Discussion and Updates</a></div>]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>732</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Philippine Navy Discussion and Updates</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2026 13:33:24 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/philippine-navy-discussion-and-updates.11183/</link>
      <guid>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/philippine-navy-discussion-and-updates.11183/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (gforce)</author>
      <category domain="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/navy-maritime.22/"><![CDATA[Navy & Maritime]]></category>
      <dc:creator>gforce</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="bbWrapper"><b>Philippine Navy Modernization</b><br />
<br />
<b>DND rushing acquisition of Navy vessels</b><br />
<span style="font-size: 9px">(The Philippine Star) Updated May 16, 2010 12:00 AM</span><br />
<br />
MANILA, Philippines - Outgoing Defense Secretary Norberto Gonzales is rushing the acquisition of one or two multi-role vessels through a government-to-government contract at a cost of from P5 billion to P10 billion... either from Singapore or South Korea...<br />
<br />
<a href="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/philippine-navy-discussion-and-updates.11183/" class="link link--internal">Philippine Navy Discussion and Updates</a></div>]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>801</slash:comments>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>