<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="no"?><rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Defense Forum at DefenceTalk.com</title>
    <description>Global Defense forum, discuss topics on air force, army, navy, missiles and global military news updates in internet's most professional defence forum.</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 23:12:57 +0000</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 23:12:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>Defence Forum &amp; Military Photos - DefenceTalk</generator>
    <link>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/</link>
    <atom:link href="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/-/index.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Royal Australian Navy Discussions and Updates 2.0</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 23:05:40 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/royal-australian-navy-discussions-and-updates-2-0.15429/</link>
      <guid>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/royal-australian-navy-discussions-and-updates-2-0.15429/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (OPSSG)</author>
      <category domain="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/navy-maritime.22/"><![CDATA[Navy & Maritime]]></category>
      <dc:creator>OPSSG</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="bbWrapper"><b><span style="color: rgb(65, 168, 95)">1.  This Royal Australian Navy Discussions and Updates 2.0 thread is a continuation of the</span> </b><a href="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/royal-australian-navy-discussions-and-updates.5905/" class="link link--internal"><b>older thread</b></a><b> <span style="color: rgb(65, 168, 95)">(starting 20 Nov 2021).  <b>The older RAN thread at 1,500+ pages is a bit too long and further discussions should continue here. Some prior posts before this was moved here from the RAN thread to seed future...</b></span></b><br />
<br />
<a href="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/royal-australian-navy-discussions-and-updates-2-0.15429/" class="link link--internal">Royal Australian Navy Discussions and Updates 2.0</a></div>]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>15696</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Russian-Ukrainian War Thread</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 22:18:05 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/the-russian-ukrainian-war-thread.15283/</link>
      <guid>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/the-russian-ukrainian-war-thread.15283/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (Feanor)</author>
      <category domain="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/geostrategic-issues.47/"><![CDATA[Geostrategic Issues]]></category>
      <dc:creator>Feanor</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="bbWrapper">I tried looking for the last one of these we had but it seems to be buried pretty deep, so I'll start a new one. This is a catchall thread for the ongoing military and geo-strategic stalemate in eastern Ukraine.<br />
<br />
As of late there have been increasing indicators that something might be brewing. Mostly pro-Russian sources have been pointing out increasing movements of Ukrainian troops, including armor, towards the front line. Now there are indications of rearmament of frontline units with...<br />
<br />
<a href="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/the-russian-ukrainian-war-thread.15283/" class="link link--internal">The Russian-Ukrainian War Thread</a></div>]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>15337</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Japanese Maritime Self Defense Force Thread</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 09:50:41 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/japanese-maritime-self-defense-force-thread.11488/</link>
      <guid>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/japanese-maritime-self-defense-force-thread.11488/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (gf0012-aust)</author>
      <category domain="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/navy-maritime.22/"><![CDATA[Navy & Maritime]]></category>
      <dc:creator>gf0012-aust</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="bbWrapper">New Helicopter Carrier for Japanese Navy<br />
By Keith Henderson at October 11, 2011 07:35 <br />
Filed Under: Research &amp; Development <br />
<br />
Details of the propulsion system for the new Helicopter Carrier of the Japanese Navy / Maritime Self-Defence Force (JMSDF) have been announced. To be built by IHI of Tokyo, the LOA 814 ft (248 m) and beam of 124 ft (38 m) vessel will have a fully loaded displacement of around 27,500 tons. The official Japanese 22DDH designation of the ship is of a “destroyer” but...<br />
<br />
<a href="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/japanese-maritime-self-defense-force-thread.11488/" class="link link--internal">Japanese Maritime Self Defense Force Thread</a></div>]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>691</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>General Information on missile/artillery developments</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 08:50:48 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/general-information-on-missile-artillery-developments.15601/</link>
      <guid>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/general-information-on-missile-artillery-developments.15601/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (John Fedup)</author>
      <category domain="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/missiles-wmds.23/"><![CDATA[Missiles & WMDs]]></category>
      <dc:creator>John Fedup</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="bbWrapper">This article describes the PrSM which can be used with HIMARS and MLRS.  Longer range and the ability to hit moving targets are some of the highlights.<br />
<br />

	

	<div class="bbCodeBlock bbCodeBlock--unfurl    js-unfurl fauxBlockLink"
		data-unfurl="true" data-result-id="25371" data-url="https://www.navalnews.com/naval-news/2022/08/precision-strike-missile-prsm-information-update/" data-host="www.navalnews.com" data-pending="false">
		<div class="contentRow">
			
				<div class="contentRow-figure contentRow-figure--fixedSmall js-unfurl-figure">
					
						<img src="https://www.navalnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/PrSM-2.jpg" alt="www.navalnews.com" data-onerror="hide-parent"/>
					
				</div>
			
			<div class="contentRow-main">
				<h3 class="contentRow-header js-unfurl-title">
					<a href="https://www.navalnews.com/naval-news/2022/08/precision-strike-missile-prsm-information-update/"
						class="link link--external fauxBlockLink-blockLink"
						target="_blank"
						rel="nofollow noopener"
						data-proxy-href="">
						Precision Strike Missile (PrSM) Information Update - Naval News
					</a>
				</h3>

				<div class="contentRow-snippet js-unfurl-desc">One of the greatest advantages of the U.S. Army&#039;s Precision Strike Missile PrSM is that it can hit moving land and maritime targets using a multi-mode seeker.</div>

				<div class="contentRow-minor contentRow-minor--hideLinks">
					<span class="js-unfurl-favicon">
						
							<img src="https://www.navalnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/cropped-favicon-1-32x32.png" alt="www.navalnews.com" class="bbCodeBlockUnfurl-icon"
								data-onerror="hide-parent"/>
						
					</span>
					www.navalnews.com
				</div>
			</div>
		</div>
	</div></div>]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>21</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>AI</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 03:48:13 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/ai.15790/</link>
      <guid>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/ai.15790/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (hauritz)</author>
      <category domain="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/cybersecurity.63/"><![CDATA[Cybersecurity]]></category>
      <dc:creator>hauritz</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="bbWrapper">Couldn't find an existing tread on AI. I think it deserves one however. Like it or not the future is AI. My own exposure to AI first happened around 5 years ago. I was working as a 3d animator for an online poker site. That is when the company I was working for became aware or the first rudimentary AI bots playing in the real money online poker rooms. Up until then there were online bots but they were simply probability machines which frankly were easily detected and pretty easy to beat. AI...<br />
<br />
<a href="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/ai.15790/" class="link link--internal">AI</a></div>]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>29</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>US Space Force</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2026 23:19:45 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/us-space-force.15112/</link>
      <guid>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/us-space-force.15112/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (Terran)</author>
      <category domain="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/space-technology.32/"><![CDATA[Space Technology]]></category>
      <dc:creator>Terran</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="bbWrapper">Unless you have been living in a cave, by now you should be aware that the US DOD is spinning off of the USAF a new service the US Space Force. Every aspect of the new borne service is currently under critique from Military watchers to pop culture to the point of satirical TV series (Netflix Space Force) and Sci-fi movies (Ad Astria). <br />
<br />
Aspects like the first official Uniform (a modified version of the USAF OCP combat uniform).<br />
[URL...<br />
<br />
<a href="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/us-space-force.15112/" class="link link--internal">US Space Force</a></div>]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Indonesia:  'green water navy'</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2026 22:11:34 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/indonesia-green-water-navy.3897/</link>
      <guid>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/indonesia-green-water-navy.3897/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (Supe)</author>
      <category domain="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/navy-maritime.22/"><![CDATA[Navy & Maritime]]></category>
      <dc:creator>Supe</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="bbWrapper">After reading this (quite interesting) <a href="http://www.strategypage.com/messageboards/messages/512-12402.asp" target="_blank" class="link link--external" rel="nofollow noopener"> thread</a> on Indonesian aspirations for a 'green water navy' , it left me wondering about the capabilities of the Indonesian Navy as it stands now and the direction it wants to take. <a href="http://www.hazegray.org/worldnav/asiapac/indones.htm" target="_blank" class="link link--external" rel="nofollow noopener">World Navies today</a> website  lists quite a few assets, particularly of amphibious ships. It looks like they have a decent amphibious...<br />
<br />
<a href="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/indonesia-green-water-navy.3897/" class="link link--internal">Indonesia:  'green water navy'</a></div>]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>3770</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>NZDF General discussion thread</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2026 21:22:30 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/nzdf-general-discussion-thread.6137/</link>
      <guid>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/nzdf-general-discussion-thread.6137/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (NZLAV)</author>
      <category domain="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/geostrategic-issues.47/"><![CDATA[Geostrategic Issues]]></category>
      <dc:creator>NZLAV</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="bbWrapper">If a new government came into power in New Zealand and had the vision of making New Zealand a regional power, what could they to to make this happen?<br />
<br />
New Zealand's army is very well trained as in equipt with modern weapon such as:<br />
<br />
<u>Armoured Vehicles</u><br />
<br />
105 x NZ Light Armoured Vehicle (NZLAV) <br />
352x Pinzgauer Light Operational Vehicle (LOV) <br />
<br />
<u>Missile Systems</u><br />
<br />
12 x Mistral anti-aircraft missile <br />
24 x Javelin Anti-Tank Guided Missile (ATGM) launchers <br />
<br />
<u>Support...</u><br />
<br />
<a href="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/nzdf-general-discussion-thread.6137/" class="link link--internal">NZDF General discussion thread</a></div>]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>9342</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>New Zealand Army</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2026 21:21:07 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/new-zealand-army.4547/</link>
      <guid>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/new-zealand-army.4547/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (Whiskyjack)</author>
      <category domain="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/army-security-forces.21/"><![CDATA[Army & Security Forces]]></category>
      <dc:creator>Whiskyjack</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="bbWrapper"><span style="color: black">Hi Guys, before Christmas I saw a media report that suggested that the NZ army had conducted a review of how it was going to organise its battalions.  This review was a result of manpower shortages and new equipment. This review was finished the same time as the Defence Sustainability Initiative released in May 2005, but has not been released.</span><br />
 <br />
<span style="color: black">I have seen nothing since, but I know the Australian army is looking at changing its...</span><br />
<br />
<a href="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/new-zealand-army.4547/" class="link link--internal">New Zealand Army</a></div>]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>2362</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>German Navy</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2026 12:51:12 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/german-navy.13997/</link>
      <guid>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/german-navy.13997/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (gf0012-aust)</author>
      <category domain="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/navy-maritime.22/"><![CDATA[Navy & Maritime]]></category>
      <dc:creator>gf0012-aust</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="bbWrapper">catch all thread</div>]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>517</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Indonesian Aero News</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2026 11:26:47 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/indonesian-aero-news.9220/</link>
      <guid>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/indonesian-aero-news.9220/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (Ananda)</author>
      <category domain="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/air-force-aviation.20/"><![CDATA[Air Force & Aviation]]></category>
      <dc:creator>Ananda</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="bbWrapper"><a href="http://newspaper.pikiran-rakyat.com/prprint.php?mib=beritadetail&amp;id=81605" target="_blank" class="link link--external" rel="nofollow noopener">PIKIRAN RAKYAT - PT DI Akan Produksi Pesawat Amfibi</a><br />
<br />
I'm sorry the link is in local newspaper, but in short it's said that the Indonesian Aerospaces (PT. DI) will build (under license) with Dornier a light amphibious plane.<br />
<br />
The DI spokesman says the plane will have capacities for 14 passanger (outside the pilot) and have two engines.<br />
Try to find the info in dornier site, still has not find the relevant...<br />
<br />
<a href="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/indonesian-aero-news.9220/" class="link link--internal">Indonesian Aero News</a></div>]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>3852</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>6th Generation Fighters Projects</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2026 10:27:29 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/6th-generation-fighters-projects.15234/</link>
      <guid>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/6th-generation-fighters-projects.15234/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (Sandhi Yudha)</author>
      <category domain="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/air-force-aviation.20/"><![CDATA[Air Force & Aviation]]></category>
      <dc:creator>Sandhi Yudha</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="bbWrapper">If i'm not wrong there isn't a thread yet for new and future 5,5th and 6th generation fighterjet programs, so lets start one.<br />
<br />




<blockquote class="bbCodeBlock bbCodeBlock--expandable bbCodeBlock--quote">
	
	<div class="bbCodeBlock-content">
		
		<div class="bbCodeBlock-expandContent ">
			The sixth-generation jet — planned by the U.K., Sweden and Italy and set to enter service after 2030 — will bristle with new technology, from its weaponry and propulsion to a virtual cockpit projected inside the pilot’s helmet.<br />
<br />
But the group set the bar high in October by announcing the fighter’s radar would process a quantity of data equivalent to nine...
		</div>
		<div class="bbCodeBlock-expandLink"><a>Click to expand...</a></div>
	</div>
</blockquote><a href="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/6th-generation-fighters-projects.15234/" class="link link--internal">6th Generation Fighters Projects</a></div>]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>426</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Royal Australian Air Force [RAAF] News, Discussions and Updates</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2026 08:09:09 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/royal-australian-air-force-raaf-news-discussions-and-updates.6007/</link>
      <guid>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/royal-australian-air-force-raaf-news-discussions-and-updates.6007/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (Todjaeger)</author>
      <category domain="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/air-force-aviation.20/"><![CDATA[Air Force & Aviation]]></category>
      <dc:creator>Todjaeger</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="bbWrapper">Thought I'd start a general RAAF thread, since many of the existing ones end up shifting back and forth despite the initial start of the topic.  That and I have a question that doesn't quite seem to pertain to any active thread at present.<br />
<br />
Currently the Project Wedgetail (AIR 5077) for the E-737 is ongoing but behind 18+ months.  Delivery from what I've last read is now expected in early 2010, although some are already in Australia.  As part of the program, 4 were ordered, with options...<br />
<br />
<a href="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/royal-australian-air-force-raaf-news-discussions-and-updates.6007/" class="link link--internal">Royal Australian Air Force [RAAF] News, Discussions and Updates</a></div>]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>10672</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Marine Nationale (French Navy)</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 13:53:34 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/marine-nationale-french-navy.7150/</link>
      <guid>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/marine-nationale-french-navy.7150/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (Spacearrow99)</author>
      <category domain="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/navy-maritime.22/"><![CDATA[Navy & Maritime]]></category>
      <dc:creator>Spacearrow99</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="bbWrapper">The Bulgarians have pushed back the Gowind deal with France.They are buying some old upgraded Belgium frigates. Sarko has to be very embarrassed, Muammar al-Gaddafi is visiting Paris this Monday. Seif el-Islam Gaddafi, a son of the colonel's, said that they want to buy alot of military equipment, in a interview with Le Figaro.<br />
<br />
The Jeanne D'Arc may be replace by a ferry. The plan would be very expense. I don't like the plan because of the expense...<br />
<br />
<a href="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/marine-nationale-french-navy.7150/" class="link link--internal">Marine Nationale (French Navy)</a></div>]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>791</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>A400m</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 09:18:11 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/a400m.13488/</link>
      <guid>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/a400m.13488/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (John Fedup)</author>
      <category domain="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/air-force-aviation.20/"><![CDATA[Air Force & Aviation]]></category>
      <dc:creator>John Fedup</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="bbWrapper">The crash of the A400M in Spain resulted in a 4% drop in Airbus shares.  The two black boxes have been recovered so depending on the results this will either be an error causing an unfortunate tragedy or a major set back for the A400M program.  As this is the only semi strategic lifter in Western production, hopefully there is a straight forward solution to get the plane flying again.</div>]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>270</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RSN capabilities</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 05:53:11 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/rsn-capabilities.6411/</link>
      <guid>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/rsn-capabilities.6411/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (SGMilitary)</author>
      <category domain="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/navy-maritime.22/"><![CDATA[Navy & Maritime]]></category>
      <dc:creator>SGMilitary</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="bbWrapper">Anyone knows what is the development plan for RSN over the next 5-10 years?<br />
<br />
It was speculated that out Victory covettes will be replaced with a larger <br />
<br />
and more capable stealth frigates in the next several years.<br />
<br />
And as mentioned the next 5-10 years will be a modernisation plans for a 3G <br />
<br />
SAF.<br />
<br />
Anyone has any comments??</div>]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>441</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Japan, Koreas, China and Taiwan regional issues</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 01:21:45 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/japan-koreas-china-and-taiwan-regional-issues.14044/</link>
      <guid>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/japan-koreas-china-and-taiwan-regional-issues.14044/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (Chino)</author>
      <category domain="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/geostrategic-issues.47/"><![CDATA[Geostrategic Issues]]></category>
      <dc:creator>Chino</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="bbWrapper"><blockquote class="bbCodeBlock bbCodeBlock--expandable bbCodeBlock--quote">
	
		<div class="bbCodeBlock-title">
			
				<a href="/military/goto/post?id=0"
					class="bbCodeBlock-sourceJump"
					data-xf-click="attribution"
					data-content-selector="#post-0">STURM said:</a>
			
		</div>
	
	<div class="bbCodeBlock-content">
		
		<div class="bbCodeBlock-expandContent ">
			Well for a start it certainly doesn't want to but if things suddenly got worse, it would be left with little choice, especially if its key national interests came under threat.
		</div>
		<div class="bbCodeBlock-expandLink"><a>Click to expand...</a></div>
	</div>
</blockquote>I wonder where TWN would stand if fighting did break out. It'd be confusing, since both TWN and JPN are US allies. But TWN opposes JPN's claim of Diaoyu (and its own claim of Diaoyu is the same one as the PRC's)...:dbanana<br />
<br />
...<br />
<br />
The JPN move to &quot;buy&quot; the islands from its &quot;private...<br />
<br />
<a href="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/japan-koreas-china-and-taiwan-regional-issues.14044/" class="link link--internal">Japan, Koreas, China and Taiwan regional issues</a></div>]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>429</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Future Energy Pathways</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2026 19:22:19 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/future-energy-pathways.14649/</link>
      <guid>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/future-energy-pathways.14649/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (MrConservative)</author>
      <category domain="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/intros-off-topic.60/"><![CDATA[Intros & Off Topic]]></category>
      <dc:creator>MrConservative</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="bbWrapper">This thread is to discuss future energy solutions and policies including the relationship between energy and national security.</div>]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>270</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>AHM-4 hypersonic missile tested for first time</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2026 14:46:44 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/ahm-4-hypersonic-missile-tested-for-first-time.16065/</link>
      <guid>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/ahm-4-hypersonic-missile-tested-for-first-time.16065/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (Masquerader)</author>
      <category domain="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/missiles-wmds.23/"><![CDATA[Missiles & WMDs]]></category>
      <dc:creator>Masquerader</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="bbWrapper">The Raytheon AHM-4 air-launched hypersonic missile is now in the flight testing stage.<br />
<br />

	

	<div class="bbCodeBlock bbCodeBlock--unfurl    js-unfurl fauxBlockLink"
		data-unfurl="true" data-result-id="101988" data-url="https://www.twz.com/air/first-release-of-usafs-new-hacm-hypersonic-cruise-missile-has-happened-over-a-test-range-in-australia" data-host="www.twz.com" data-pending="false">
		<div class="contentRow">
			
				<div class="contentRow-figure contentRow-figure--fixedSmall js-unfurl-figure">
					
						<img src="https://www.twz.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/10/hacm-flight-testing-has-begun.jpg?w=1200" alt="www.twz.com" data-onerror="hide-parent"/>
					
				</div>
			
			<div class="contentRow-main">
				<h3 class="contentRow-header js-unfurl-title">
					<a href="https://www.twz.com/air/first-release-of-usafs-new-hacm-hypersonic-cruise-missile-has-happened-over-a-test-range-in-australia"
						class="link link--external fauxBlockLink-blockLink"
						target="_blank"
						rel="nofollow noopener"
						data-proxy-href="">
						First Release Of USAF’s New HACM Hypersonic Cruise Missile Has Happened Over Australian Range
					</a>
				</h3>

				<div class="contentRow-snippet js-unfurl-desc">The US and Australia are partners on the Hypersonic Attack Cruise Missile, which has finally reached flight testing after major delays.</div>

				<div class="contentRow-minor contentRow-minor--hideLinks">
					<span class="js-unfurl-favicon">
						
							<img src="https://www.twz.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/30/TWZ_Favicon.png?quality=85&amp;w=32" alt="www.twz.com" class="bbCodeBlockUnfurl-icon"
								data-onerror="hide-parent"/>
						
					</span>
					www.twz.com
				</div>
			</div>
		</div>
	</div></div>]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Military Aviation News and Discussion</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2026 13:01:57 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/military-aviation-news-and-discussion.13643/</link>
      <guid>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/military-aviation-news-and-discussion.13643/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (ngatimozart)</author>
      <category domain="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/air-force-aviation.20/"><![CDATA[Air Force & Aviation]]></category>
      <dc:creator>ngatimozart</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="bbWrapper">I've started this thread so that military aviation news can be posted and discussed. this is more about the equipment in general rather than placing it in one another air force's and / or navy's thread. This way it isn't repeated or lost. This is <b>not an aircraft vs another aircraft argument thread</b> - see the <a href="http://www.defencetalk.com/forums/air-force-aviation/why-vs-platform-discussions-unproductive-13165/#post280996" class="link link--internal">guidance</a>.</div>]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>1275</slash:comments>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>