<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="no"?><rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Defense Forum at DefenceTalk.com</title>
    <description>Global Defense forum, discuss topics on air force, army, navy, missiles and global military news updates in internet's most professional defence forum.</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 05:35:21 +0000</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 05:35:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>Defence Forum &amp; Military Photos - DefenceTalk</generator>
    <link>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/</link>
    <atom:link href="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/-/index.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Middle East Defence &amp; Security</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 04:15:02 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/middle-east-defence-security.13210/</link>
      <guid>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/middle-east-defence-security.13210/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (MaenZ)</author>
      <category domain="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/geostrategic-issues.47/"><![CDATA[Geostrategic Issues]]></category>
      <dc:creator>MaenZ</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="bbWrapper">It's funny to call this a crisis because we have always been at war.<br />
<br />
Anyway, Does you have any strategic insight to share about the growing ISIL threat in the region?<br />
<br />
I'm particularly interested with Jordanian defense capability against the group. As voices inside Jordan claim that ISIL cannot possibly break into Jordanian defenses. However outside neutral sources claim that Jordan cannot handle ISIL on it's own.<br />
<br />
Jordan is claimed to be the best trained Arab fighting force on the...<br />
<br />
<a href="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/middle-east-defence-security.13210/" class="link link--internal">Middle East Defence &amp; Security</a></div>]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>1942</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ADF General discussion thread</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 02:44:17 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/adf-general-discussion-thread.11750/</link>
      <guid>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/adf-general-discussion-thread.11750/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (Todjaeger)</author>
      <category domain="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/geostrategic-issues.47/"><![CDATA[Geostrategic Issues]]></category>
      <dc:creator>Todjaeger</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="bbWrapper">With the recent release of the interim <a href="http://www.defence.gov.au/oscdf/adf-posture-review/docs/interim/default.htm" target="_blank" class="link link--external" rel="nofollow noopener">ADF Posture Review</a>, it was IMO rightly suggested that a general ADF discussion thread should be created.  Having looked at some of the recommendations and how some appear to be tri-service in nature, it seemed like a non-service specific thread would be good.<br />
<br />
Having done a quick read through, a few things do jump out at me.<br />
<br />
One of the first was the suggestion...<br />
<br />
<a href="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/adf-general-discussion-thread.11750/" class="link link--internal">ADF General discussion thread</a></div>]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>3967</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Australian Army Discussions and Updates</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 02:37:34 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/australian-army-discussions-and-updates.5526/</link>
      <guid>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/australian-army-discussions-and-updates.5526/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (mickk)</author>
      <category domain="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/army-security-forces.21/"><![CDATA[Army & Security Forces]]></category>
      <dc:creator>mickk</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="bbWrapper">James Button, London<br />
November 24, 2006<br />
<br />


	
	
		
		
	


	<div class="lbContainer lbContainer--inline " title=""
		data-xf-init="lightbox"
		data-lb-single-image="1"
		data-lb-container-zoom="1"
		data-lb-trigger=".js-lbImage-_xfUid-1-1777354521"
		data-lb-id="_xfUid-1-1777354521">
		
			<div class="lbContainer-zoomer js-lbImage-_xfUid-1-1777354521" data-src="http://i10.tinypic.com/2heeouc.jpg" aria-label="Zoom"></div>
		
		<img src="http://i10.tinypic.com/2heeouc.jpg" data-url="http://i10.tinypic.com/2heeouc.jpg" class="bbImage" data-zoom-target="1"  style="" />
	</div>

<br />
<br />
HE REMEMBERS every detail: a massive explosion in the helicopter, a smell of cordite, bullets ricocheting off the walls, his door gunner trying to get a shot at their attackers, and his co-pilot noticing blood pooling in his lap and realising he had been shot through the chest.<br />
<br />
&quot;He was amazing,&quot; Scott Watkins says of his co-pilot that day in Iraq, Keith Reesby, whose heart escaped a bullet by two...<br />
<br />
<a href="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/australian-army-discussions-and-updates.5526/" class="link link--internal">Australian Army Discussions and Updates</a></div>]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>12207</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Russia - General Discussion.</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2026 20:35:33 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/russia-general-discussion.14791/</link>
      <guid>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/russia-general-discussion.14791/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (Feanor)</author>
      <category domain="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/geostrategic-issues.47/"><![CDATA[Geostrategic Issues]]></category>
      <dc:creator>Feanor</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="bbWrapper">I think this pair of articles by Pukhov make an excellent point regarding the current deterioration of relations between Russia and the west, Russia and NATO, and Russia and the US. I think that essentially Pukhov is correct in thinking that whoever replaces Putin is going to be no softer or more amenable to the West. In fact a number of people in the current government have significantly stronger anti-western sentiment, and that there is a good chance that Putin will be remembered as a...<br />
<br />
<a href="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/russia-general-discussion.14791/" class="link link--internal">Russia - General Discussion.</a></div>]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>2964</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Russian Navy Discussions and Updates</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2026 03:52:19 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/russian-navy-discussions-and-updates.8178/</link>
      <guid>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/russian-navy-discussions-and-updates.8178/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (Spacearrow99)</author>
      <category domain="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/navy-maritime.22/"><![CDATA[Navy & Maritime]]></category>
      <dc:creator>Spacearrow99</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="bbWrapper">The main Russian surface fleet project for the next decade will be Project 22350 Admiral Gorshkov.<br />
<br />
Specifications<br />
4500t<br />
4000nm range @ 16kt<br />
29kt top speed<br />
30 day endurance<br />
crew of 210<br />
<br />
Armament<br />
2*8 Yakhont<br />
4*8 9M96 missiles (The is 9M96 one of the missiles the S-400 system uses.)<br />
2*4 Medvedka 2 VLS ASW<br />
2 Sosna CIAD<br />
130mm A-192<br />
<br />
Command and Control<br />
Redut AA Suite<br />
<br />
Sensors<br />
Poliment K-Radar<br />
Puma Fire Control Radar<br />
<br />
The VLS Shtil-1 will be offered to export customers...<br />
<br />
<a href="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/russian-navy-discussions-and-updates.8178/" class="link link--internal">Russian Navy Discussions and Updates</a></div>]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>1850</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>NZDF General discussion thread</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2026 00:45:35 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/nzdf-general-discussion-thread.6137/</link>
      <guid>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/nzdf-general-discussion-thread.6137/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (NZLAV)</author>
      <category domain="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/geostrategic-issues.47/"><![CDATA[Geostrategic Issues]]></category>
      <dc:creator>NZLAV</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="bbWrapper">If a new government came into power in New Zealand and had the vision of making New Zealand a regional power, what could they to to make this happen?<br />
<br />
New Zealand's army is very well trained as in equipt with modern weapon such as:<br />
<br />
<u>Armoured Vehicles</u><br />
<br />
105 x NZ Light Armoured Vehicle (NZLAV) <br />
352x Pinzgauer Light Operational Vehicle (LOV) <br />
<br />
<u>Missile Systems</u><br />
<br />
12 x Mistral anti-aircraft missile <br />
24 x Javelin Anti-Tank Guided Missile (ATGM) launchers <br />
<br />
<u>Support...</u><br />
<br />
<a href="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/nzdf-general-discussion-thread.6137/" class="link link--internal">NZDF General discussion thread</a></div>]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>9260</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Russian-Ukrainian War Thread</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2026 23:10:05 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/the-russian-ukrainian-war-thread.15283/</link>
      <guid>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/the-russian-ukrainian-war-thread.15283/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (Feanor)</author>
      <category domain="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/geostrategic-issues.47/"><![CDATA[Geostrategic Issues]]></category>
      <dc:creator>Feanor</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="bbWrapper">I tried looking for the last one of these we had but it seems to be buried pretty deep, so I'll start a new one. This is a catchall thread for the ongoing military and geo-strategic stalemate in eastern Ukraine.<br />
<br />
As of late there have been increasing indicators that something might be brewing. Mostly pro-Russian sources have been pointing out increasing movements of Ukrainian troops, including armor, towards the front line. Now there are indications of rearmament of frontline units with...<br />
<br />
<a href="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/the-russian-ukrainian-war-thread.15283/" class="link link--internal">The Russian-Ukrainian War Thread</a></div>]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>14267</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>US Navy News and updates</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2026 16:53:21 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/us-navy-news-and-updates.7961/</link>
      <guid>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/us-navy-news-and-updates.7961/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (AegisFC)</author>
      <category domain="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/navy-maritime.22/"><![CDATA[Navy & Maritime]]></category>
      <dc:creator>AegisFC</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="bbWrapper">Navy Secretary Donald Winter announced Friday that the new amphibious assault ship known as LHA 6 would be named America, granting the wish of veterans of the aircraft carrier America, who have lobbied for another ship to take the name after theirs was sunk as a target in 2005.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.navytimes.com/news/2008/06/navy_america_name_063008w/" target="_blank" class="link link--external" rel="noopener">http://www.navytimes.com/news/2008/06/navy_america_name_063008w/</a><br />
<br />




<blockquote class="bbCodeBlock bbCodeBlock--expandable bbCodeBlock--quote">
	
	<div class="bbCodeBlock-content">
		
		<div class="bbCodeBlock-expandContent ">
			New amphib to be named America<br />
<br />
By Philip Ewing - Staff writer<br />
Posted : Wednesday Jul 2, 2008 13:13:02 EDT<br />
<br />
Navy Secretary Donald...
		</div>
		<div class="bbCodeBlock-expandLink"><a>Click to expand...</a></div>
	</div>
</blockquote><a href="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/us-navy-news-and-updates.7961/" class="link link--internal">US Navy News and updates</a></div>]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>3979</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Indo Pacific strategy</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2026 15:07:22 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/indo-pacific-strategy.14735/</link>
      <guid>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/indo-pacific-strategy.14735/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (gonefishing)</author>
      <category domain="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/geostrategic-issues.47/"><![CDATA[Geostrategic Issues]]></category>
      <dc:creator>gonefishing</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="bbWrapper">As Sino-Japanese relations continue to slide, the Chinese Ambassador to the Court of St James' has had a comment published in today's Daily Telegraph denouncing Japanese &quot;militarism&quot;, the Japanese Prime Minister's determination &quot;to lead Japan on to a perilous path&quot; as well as stating, most strongly, that &quot;They [the Japanese] pose a serious threat to global peace. The Chinese will not allow such attempts. I am sure British and all other peace-loving folk will not remain indifferent.&quot;...<br />
<br />
<a href="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/indo-pacific-strategy.14735/" class="link link--internal">Indo Pacific strategy</a></div>]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>609</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Marine Nationale (French Navy)</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2026 11:05:50 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/marine-nationale-french-navy.7150/</link>
      <guid>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/marine-nationale-french-navy.7150/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (Spacearrow99)</author>
      <category domain="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/navy-maritime.22/"><![CDATA[Navy & Maritime]]></category>
      <dc:creator>Spacearrow99</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="bbWrapper">The Bulgarians have pushed back the Gowind deal with France.They are buying some old upgraded Belgium frigates. Sarko has to be very embarrassed, Muammar al-Gaddafi is visiting Paris this Monday. Seif el-Islam Gaddafi, a son of the colonel's, said that they want to buy alot of military equipment, in a interview with Le Figaro.<br />
<br />
The Jeanne D'Arc may be replace by a ferry. The plan would be very expense. I don't like the plan because of the expense...<br />
<br />
<a href="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/marine-nationale-french-navy.7150/" class="link link--internal">Marine Nationale (French Navy)</a></div>]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>787</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Royal Canadian Navy Discussions and updates</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2026 17:39:42 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/royal-canadian-navy-discussions-and-updates.4210/</link>
      <guid>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/royal-canadian-navy-discussions-and-updates.4210/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (stephen weist)</author>
      <category domain="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/navy-maritime.22/"><![CDATA[Navy & Maritime]]></category>
      <dc:creator>stephen weist</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="bbWrapper">The tribals will have to be replaced in the near future, anyone have any thoughts on possible replacements.  I think the replacements should be slightly larger to accomodate the CnC task and also for future upgrades.  I think the anti air/missile capability should be enhanced as the city class frigates could handle the ASW component of any taskforce.  Would six be enough, this would leave on avail on each coast at all times.</div>]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>4064</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Germany</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2026 11:36:40 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/germany.14063/</link>
      <guid>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/germany.14063/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (gf0012-aust)</author>
      <category domain="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/geostrategic-issues.47/"><![CDATA[Geostrategic Issues]]></category>
      <dc:creator>gf0012-aust</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="bbWrapper">catchall thread for Germany</div>]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>364</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Indonesia:  'green water navy'</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2026 10:14:13 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/indonesia-green-water-navy.3897/</link>
      <guid>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/indonesia-green-water-navy.3897/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (Supe)</author>
      <category domain="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/navy-maritime.22/"><![CDATA[Navy & Maritime]]></category>
      <dc:creator>Supe</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="bbWrapper">After reading this (quite interesting) <a href="http://www.strategypage.com/messageboards/messages/512-12402.asp" target="_blank" class="link link--external" rel="nofollow noopener"> thread</a> on Indonesian aspirations for a 'green water navy' , it left me wondering about the capabilities of the Indonesian Navy as it stands now and the direction it wants to take. <a href="http://www.hazegray.org/worldnav/asiapac/indones.htm" target="_blank" class="link link--external" rel="nofollow noopener">World Navies today</a> website  lists quite a few assets, particularly of amphibious ships. It looks like they have a decent amphibious...<br />
<br />
<a href="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/indonesia-green-water-navy.3897/" class="link link--internal">Indonesia:  'green water navy'</a></div>]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>3513</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Royal New Zealand Navy Discussions and Updates</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2026 13:11:51 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/royal-new-zealand-navy-discussions-and-updates.4854/</link>
      <guid>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/royal-new-zealand-navy-discussions-and-updates.4854/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (Padman)</author>
      <category domain="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/navy-maritime.22/"><![CDATA[Navy & Maritime]]></category>
      <dc:creator>Padman</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="bbWrapper">Protector Update<br />
The Navy’s new Multi-Role Vessel (pictured right), to be named CANTERBURY, has a vehicle capacity for up to 40 NZLAVs (the Army’s new armoured fighting vehicle) along with an embarked force of up to 250 personnel.<br />
<br />
The MRV’s commercial design heritage provides a comfortable and flexible level of accommodation for the embarked force, utilising a series of 12 berth cabins (four sets of bunks three deep) which are located in the superstructure on the same level as the flight...<br />
<br />
<a href="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/royal-new-zealand-navy-discussions-and-updates.4854/" class="link link--internal">Royal New Zealand Navy Discussions and Updates</a></div>]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>9702</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Royal Australian Air Force [RAAF] News, Discussions and Updates</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2026 12:35:30 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/royal-australian-air-force-raaf-news-discussions-and-updates.6007/</link>
      <guid>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/royal-australian-air-force-raaf-news-discussions-and-updates.6007/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (Todjaeger)</author>
      <category domain="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/air-force-aviation.20/"><![CDATA[Air Force & Aviation]]></category>
      <dc:creator>Todjaeger</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="bbWrapper">Thought I'd start a general RAAF thread, since many of the existing ones end up shifting back and forth despite the initial start of the topic.  That and I have a question that doesn't quite seem to pertain to any active thread at present.<br />
<br />
Currently the Project Wedgetail (AIR 5077) for the E-737 is ongoing but behind 18+ months.  Delivery from what I've last read is now expected in early 2010, although some are already in Australia.  As part of the program, 4 were ordered, with options...<br />
<br />
<a href="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/royal-australian-air-force-raaf-news-discussions-and-updates.6007/" class="link link--internal">Royal Australian Air Force [RAAF] News, Discussions and Updates</a></div>]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>10400</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Royal Australian Navy Discussions and Updates 2.0</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2026 08:24:43 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/royal-australian-navy-discussions-and-updates-2-0.15429/</link>
      <guid>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/royal-australian-navy-discussions-and-updates-2-0.15429/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (OPSSG)</author>
      <category domain="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/navy-maritime.22/"><![CDATA[Navy & Maritime]]></category>
      <dc:creator>OPSSG</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="bbWrapper"><b><span style="color: rgb(65, 168, 95)">1.  This Royal Australian Navy Discussions and Updates 2.0 thread is a continuation of the</span> </b><a href="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/royal-australian-navy-discussions-and-updates.5905/" class="link link--internal"><b>older thread</b></a><b> <span style="color: rgb(65, 168, 95)">(starting 20 Nov 2021).  <b>The older RAN thread at 1,500+ pages is a bit too long and further discussions should continue here. Some prior posts before this was moved here from the RAN thread to seed future...</b></span></b><br />
<br />
<a href="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/royal-australian-navy-discussions-and-updates-2-0.15429/" class="link link--internal">Royal Australian Navy Discussions and Updates 2.0</a></div>]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>14743</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>European Union, member states and Agencies</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2026 12:21:41 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/european-union-member-states-and-agencies.15723/</link>
      <guid>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/european-union-member-states-and-agencies.15723/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (SolarisKenzo)</author>
      <category domain="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/geostrategic-issues.47/"><![CDATA[Geostrategic Issues]]></category>
      <dc:creator>SolarisKenzo</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="bbWrapper">As a result of the tragic 2015 European migrant crisis, the European Union decided to create its first Standing Corp: The European Border and Coast Guard Agency, also known as Frontex ( wich was the name of the previous agency that was replaced ).<br />
<br />

	

	<div class="bbCodeBlock bbCodeBlock--unfurl    js-unfurl fauxBlockLink"
		data-unfurl="true" data-result-id="33159" data-url="https://frontex.europa.eu/" data-host="frontex.europa.eu" data-pending="false">
		<div class="contentRow">
			
			<div class="contentRow-main">
				<h3 class="contentRow-header js-unfurl-title">
					<a href="https://frontex.europa.eu/"
						class="link link--external fauxBlockLink-blockLink"
						target="_blank"
						rel="nofollow noopener"
						data-proxy-href="">
						Frontex | European Union Agency
					</a>
				</h3>

				<div class="contentRow-snippet js-unfurl-desc">Frontex promotes, coordinates and develops European border management in line with the EU fundamental rights charter applying the concept of Integrated Border Management.</div>

				<div class="contentRow-minor contentRow-minor--hideLinks">
					<span class="js-unfurl-favicon">
						
					</span>
					frontex.europa.eu
				</div>
			</div>
		</div>
	</div>
<br />
Frontex is de iure and de facto a Federal Agency, with its own standing corp and officers.<br />
<br />
Its HQ is in Warsaw.<br />
<br />
While being almost unknown outside of the EU, Frontex is the fastest growing...<br />
<br />
<a href="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/european-union-member-states-and-agencies.15723/" class="link link--internal">European Union, member states and Agencies</a></div>]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>327</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Royal Malaysian Navy (RMN) update</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2026 02:53:23 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/royal-malaysian-navy-rmn-update.8515/</link>
      <guid>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/royal-malaysian-navy-rmn-update.8515/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (Ding)</author>
      <category domain="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/navy-maritime.22/"><![CDATA[Navy & Maritime]]></category>
      <dc:creator>Ding</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="bbWrapper"><b>RMN capabilities and shortfalls</b><br />
<br />
The thread about RMAF future has been a great eye opener to me and, for me at least, it has been a great discussion platform to hear views from professionals and enthusiast. <br />
<br />
Here, to take up the suggestion by awang_se (i think) to start a discussion about the Royal Malaysian Navy, I'm starting this thread. And as a forum rule, I have to state my opinion first...correct?<img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite8" alt=":D" title="Big Grin    :D" data-shortname=":D" /> Okay<br />
<br />
RMN Inventory of Combat and support vessel:<br />
<br />
2x Lekiu Class FFG...<br />
<br />
<a href="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/royal-malaysian-navy-rmn-update.8515/" class="link link--internal">Royal Malaysian Navy (RMN) update</a></div>]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>685</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Koninklijke Luchtmacht/Royal Netherlands Air Force</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2026 02:50:50 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/koninklijke-luchtmacht-royal-netherlands-air-force.15077/</link>
      <guid>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/koninklijke-luchtmacht-royal-netherlands-air-force.15077/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (Sandhi Yudha)</author>
      <category domain="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/air-force-aviation.20/"><![CDATA[Air Force & Aviation]]></category>
      <dc:creator>Sandhi Yudha</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="bbWrapper">There seems to be no thread yet about the Koninkijke Luchtmacht (KLu) / Royal Netherlands Air Force or other Dutch aviation news, so lets start with one.<br />
<br />
So Airbus delivered a couple of days ago the first out of eight ordered A330-200 Multi Role Tanker Transport (MRTT) aircrafts to the Multinational MRTT Fleet (MMF) of the NAVO. The A330-200 MRTT with registration number T-055 landed on 14:48 tuesday 30 june 2020 <i>at Vliegbasis Eindhoven.</i><br />
The fleet will be jointly operated but four of...<br />
<br />
<a href="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/koninklijke-luchtmacht-royal-netherlands-air-force.15077/" class="link link--internal">Koninklijke Luchtmacht/Royal Netherlands Air Force</a></div>]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>40</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>International Army News Thread</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2026 01:07:59 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/international-army-news-thread.11932/</link>
      <guid>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/international-army-news-thread.11932/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (Haavarla)</author>
      <category domain="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/army-security-forces.21/"><![CDATA[Army & Security Forces]]></category>
      <dc:creator>Haavarla</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="bbWrapper">Seems Norway has order an upgrade and proccurment package from Sweeden on the current CV-90 and an deal on new CV-90 as well.<br />
<br />
<i>&quot;According to the MoD, the total value of the project is estimated to be less than NOK10bn ($1.74bn). Deliveries are scheduled to start in 2013 and are to be completed by 2018.&quot;</i><br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.army-technology.com/news/newsnorwegian-army-to-buy-new-cv90-ifvs-from-bae" target="_blank" class="link link--external" rel="nofollow noopener">Norwegian Army to buy new CV90 IFVs from BAE - Army Technology</a><br />
<br />
I think this is a...<br />
<br />
<a href="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/international-army-news-thread.11932/" class="link link--internal">International Army News Thread</a></div>]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>134</slash:comments>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>