<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="no"?><rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Defense Forum at DefenceTalk.com</title>
    <description>Global Defense forum, discuss topics on air force, army, navy, missiles and global military news updates in internet's most professional defence forum.</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 19:01:12 +0000</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 19:01:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>Defence Forum &amp; Military Photos - DefenceTalk</generator>
    <link>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/</link>
    <atom:link href="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/-/index.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>KAI KF-21</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 17:48:54 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/kai-kf-21.12460/</link>
      <guid>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/kai-kf-21.12460/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (Eeshaan)</author>
      <category domain="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/air-force-aviation.20/"><![CDATA[Air Force & Aviation]]></category>
      <dc:creator>Eeshaan</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="bbWrapper"><a href="http://www.upi.com/Business_News/Security-Industry/2013/03/01/Indonesia-South-Korea-to-build-fighter-aircraft/UPI-51111362114300" target="_blank" class="link link--external" rel="nofollow noopener">KFX/IFX jet fighter to be build by Indonesia and South Korea - UPI.com</a><br />
<br />
That's interesting. This I think will be the first Asian 4.5 gen fighter, developed to rival the likes of Eurofighter and Rafale. It will be designated the F-33 when production begins.<br />
<br />
South Korea has the technology and experience with operating and maintaining Western fighter...<br />
<br />
<a href="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/kai-kf-21.12460/" class="link link--internal">KAI KF-21</a></div>]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>407</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Royal Australian Navy Discussions and Updates 2.0</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 16:32:34 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/royal-australian-navy-discussions-and-updates-2-0.15429/</link>
      <guid>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/royal-australian-navy-discussions-and-updates-2-0.15429/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (OPSSG)</author>
      <category domain="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/navy-maritime.22/"><![CDATA[Navy & Maritime]]></category>
      <dc:creator>OPSSG</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="bbWrapper"><b><span style="color: rgb(65, 168, 95)">1.  This Royal Australian Navy Discussions and Updates 2.0 thread is a continuation of the</span> </b><a href="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/royal-australian-navy-discussions-and-updates.5905/" class="link link--internal"><b>older thread</b></a><b> <span style="color: rgb(65, 168, 95)">(starting 20 Nov 2021).  <b>The older RAN thread at 1,500+ pages is a bit too long and further discussions should continue here. Some prior posts before this was moved here from the RAN thread to seed future...</b></span></b><br />
<br />
<a href="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/royal-australian-navy-discussions-and-updates-2-0.15429/" class="link link--internal">Royal Australian Navy Discussions and Updates 2.0</a></div>]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>15055</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Russian-Ukrainian War Thread</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 16:01:07 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/the-russian-ukrainian-war-thread.15283/</link>
      <guid>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/the-russian-ukrainian-war-thread.15283/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (Feanor)</author>
      <category domain="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/geostrategic-issues.47/"><![CDATA[Geostrategic Issues]]></category>
      <dc:creator>Feanor</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="bbWrapper">I tried looking for the last one of these we had but it seems to be buried pretty deep, so I'll start a new one. This is a catchall thread for the ongoing military and geo-strategic stalemate in eastern Ukraine.<br />
<br />
As of late there have been increasing indicators that something might be brewing. Mostly pro-Russian sources have been pointing out increasing movements of Ukrainian troops, including armor, towards the front line. Now there are indications of rearmament of frontline units with...<br />
<br />
<a href="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/the-russian-ukrainian-war-thread.15283/" class="link link--internal">The Russian-Ukrainian War Thread</a></div>]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>14579</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Royal Canadian Air Force (RCAF) News and Discussions</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 14:34:57 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/royal-canadian-air-force-rcaf-news-and-discussions.13518/</link>
      <guid>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/royal-canadian-air-force-rcaf-news-and-discussions.13518/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (John Fedup)</author>
      <category domain="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/air-force-aviation.20/"><![CDATA[Air Force & Aviation]]></category>
      <dc:creator>John Fedup</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="bbWrapper">As there seems to be no RCAF thread, I will start one.  Today's Ottawa Citizen is reporting the RCAF is looking at a combination of Predators and Avengers to meet Canada's drone needs.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://ottawacitizen.com/news/national/defence-watch/a-predator-c-avenger-drone-for-the-rcaf" target="_blank" class="link link--external" rel="nofollow noopener">A Predator C Avenger drone for the RCAF? | Ottawa Citizen</a><br />
<br />
<span style="color: DarkRed"><b>Mod edit: Fixed thread title.<br />
-Preceptor</b></span></div>]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>2097</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>6th Generation Fighters Projects</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 13:37:10 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/6th-generation-fighters-projects.15234/</link>
      <guid>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/6th-generation-fighters-projects.15234/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (Sandhi Yudha)</author>
      <category domain="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/air-force-aviation.20/"><![CDATA[Air Force & Aviation]]></category>
      <dc:creator>Sandhi Yudha</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="bbWrapper">If i'm not wrong there isn't a thread yet for new and future 5,5th and 6th generation fighterjet programs, so lets start one.<br />
<br />




<blockquote class="bbCodeBlock bbCodeBlock--expandable bbCodeBlock--quote">
	
	<div class="bbCodeBlock-content">
		
		<div class="bbCodeBlock-expandContent ">
			The sixth-generation jet — planned by the U.K., Sweden and Italy and set to enter service after 2030 — will bristle with new technology, from its weaponry and propulsion to a virtual cockpit projected inside the pilot’s helmet.<br />
<br />
But the group set the bar high in October by announcing the fighter’s radar would process a quantity of data equivalent to nine...
		</div>
		<div class="bbCodeBlock-expandLink"><a>Click to expand...</a></div>
	</div>
</blockquote><a href="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/6th-generation-fighters-projects.15234/" class="link link--internal">6th Generation Fighters Projects</a></div>]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>365</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Royal Australian Air Force [RAAF] News, Discussions and Updates</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 11:54:39 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/royal-australian-air-force-raaf-news-discussions-and-updates.6007/</link>
      <guid>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/royal-australian-air-force-raaf-news-discussions-and-updates.6007/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (Todjaeger)</author>
      <category domain="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/air-force-aviation.20/"><![CDATA[Air Force & Aviation]]></category>
      <dc:creator>Todjaeger</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="bbWrapper">Thought I'd start a general RAAF thread, since many of the existing ones end up shifting back and forth despite the initial start of the topic.  That and I have a question that doesn't quite seem to pertain to any active thread at present.<br />
<br />
Currently the Project Wedgetail (AIR 5077) for the E-737 is ongoing but behind 18+ months.  Delivery from what I've last read is now expected in early 2010, although some are already in Australia.  As part of the program, 4 were ordered, with options...<br />
<br />
<a href="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/royal-australian-air-force-raaf-news-discussions-and-updates.6007/" class="link link--internal">Royal Australian Air Force [RAAF] News, Discussions and Updates</a></div>]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>10500</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Middle East Defence &amp; Security</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 11:00:50 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/middle-east-defence-security.13210/</link>
      <guid>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/middle-east-defence-security.13210/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (MaenZ)</author>
      <category domain="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/geostrategic-issues.47/"><![CDATA[Geostrategic Issues]]></category>
      <dc:creator>MaenZ</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="bbWrapper">It's funny to call this a crisis because we have always been at war.<br />
<br />
Anyway, Does you have any strategic insight to share about the growing ISIL threat in the region?<br />
<br />
I'm particularly interested with Jordanian defense capability against the group. As voices inside Jordan claim that ISIL cannot possibly break into Jordanian defenses. However outside neutral sources claim that Jordan cannot handle ISIL on it's own.<br />
<br />
Jordan is claimed to be the best trained Arab fighting force on the...<br />
<br />
<a href="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/middle-east-defence-security.13210/" class="link link--internal">Middle East Defence &amp; Security</a></div>]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>1978</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Indonesian Army</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 10:20:26 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/the-indonesian-army.10167/</link>
      <guid>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/the-indonesian-army.10167/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (DavidDCM)</author>
      <category domain="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/army-security-forces.21/"><![CDATA[Army & Security Forces]]></category>
      <dc:creator>DavidDCM</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="bbWrapper">There are lots of threads in this forum related to the Singaporean and Malaysian Armed Forces, yet very few about the Indonesian military, despite being the biggest player in Southeast Asia.<br />
<br />
In the last few months there were quite a lot interesting new developments, which in my eyes are worth being discussed.<br />
<br />
One of the more interesting things that happened was a speech by the general who is the current commander of the Indonesian armored corps (or cavalry corps, as it is called in...<br />
<br />
<a href="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/the-indonesian-army.10167/" class="link link--internal">The Indonesian Army</a></div>]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>1400</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>United States Marine Corps</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 02:40:46 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/united-states-marine-corps.13872/</link>
      <guid>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/united-states-marine-corps.13872/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (vonnoobie)</author>
      <category domain="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/navy-maritime.22/"><![CDATA[Navy & Maritime]]></category>
      <dc:creator>vonnoobie</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="bbWrapper">Couldnt find a USMC thread and figured the marines deserved there own one, For now I have put it in the army section but not 100% sure where it belong's considering the have similarities and ties to every branch (Air, Naval, Land).<br />
<br />
Recently the USMC announced they would be experimenting with the squad size's which currently stand at 13, To my understanding the main experiment has to do with adding a 14th member that for the most part would be a dedicated UAV controller. <br />
<br />
Personnaly I...<br />
<br />
<a href="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/united-states-marine-corps.13872/" class="link link--internal">United States Marine Corps</a></div>]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>152</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>NZDF General discussion thread</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 02:14:14 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/nzdf-general-discussion-thread.6137/</link>
      <guid>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/nzdf-general-discussion-thread.6137/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (NZLAV)</author>
      <category domain="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/geostrategic-issues.47/"><![CDATA[Geostrategic Issues]]></category>
      <dc:creator>NZLAV</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="bbWrapper">If a new government came into power in New Zealand and had the vision of making New Zealand a regional power, what could they to to make this happen?<br />
<br />
New Zealand's army is very well trained as in equipt with modern weapon such as:<br />
<br />
<u>Armoured Vehicles</u><br />
<br />
105 x NZ Light Armoured Vehicle (NZLAV) <br />
352x Pinzgauer Light Operational Vehicle (LOV) <br />
<br />
<u>Missile Systems</u><br />
<br />
12 x Mistral anti-aircraft missile <br />
24 x Javelin Anti-Tank Guided Missile (ATGM) launchers <br />
<br />
<u>Support...</u><br />
<br />
<a href="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/nzdf-general-discussion-thread.6137/" class="link link--internal">NZDF General discussion thread</a></div>]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>9308</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Turkish Air Force -   Türk Hava Kuvvetleri</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 23:41:42 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/turkish-air-force-tuerk-hava-kuvvetleri.3768/</link>
      <guid>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/turkish-air-force-tuerk-hava-kuvvetleri.3768/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (musti)</author>
      <category domain="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/air-force-aviation.20/"><![CDATA[Air Force & Aviation]]></category>
      <dc:creator>musti</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="bbWrapper"><b>AIR FORCES COMMAND</b> <br />
<br />
Total Personnel: 60.000<br />
Reserves: 65.000<br />
<br />
<b>Structure:</b><br />
<br />
Four main commands: 1st Tactical Air Force Command (HQ Eskisehir), 2nd Tactical Air Force Command (HQ Diyarbakir), Air Training Command, Air Logistics Command.<br />
<br />
<b>TACTICAL FIGHTER AIRCRAFT</b><br />
<br />
TYPE-NUMBER-REMARKS<br />
<br />
F 16C/D Fighting Falcon Block 50 - 76 - Peace Onyx II program, assembled in Turkey.<br />
<br />
F 16C/D Fighting Falcon Block 40 - 104 - Peace Onyx I program, assembled in Turkey.<br />
<br />
F 16C/D Fighting...<br />
<br />
<a href="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/turkish-air-force-tuerk-hava-kuvvetleri.3768/" class="link link--internal">Turkish Air Force -   Türk Hava Kuvvetleri</a></div>]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>88</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Unmanned and Autonomous Air Vehicles</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 23:30:17 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/unmanned-and-autonomous-air-vehicles.15943/</link>
      <guid>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/unmanned-and-autonomous-air-vehicles.15943/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (hauritz)</author>
      <category domain="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/air-force-aviation.20/"><![CDATA[Air Force & Aviation]]></category>
      <dc:creator>hauritz</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="bbWrapper">There doesn't seem to be a thread dedicated to Unmanned and Autonomous Air Vehicles. There probably should be. There seems to be a lot of information about what UCAVs can and can't do. Generally I think we tend to overestimate the capabilities of these aircraft, or at least where the technology stands today. Certainly we have seen a rapid advancement in this technology in even just the last few years but I would hesitate at calling it game changing, at least not yet.<br />
<br />
A store bought FPV...<br />
<br />
<a href="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/unmanned-and-autonomous-air-vehicles.15943/" class="link link--internal">Unmanned and Autonomous Air Vehicles</a></div>]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>33</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Indonesian Aero News</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 13:55:27 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/indonesian-aero-news.9220/</link>
      <guid>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/indonesian-aero-news.9220/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (Ananda)</author>
      <category domain="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/air-force-aviation.20/"><![CDATA[Air Force & Aviation]]></category>
      <dc:creator>Ananda</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="bbWrapper"><a href="http://newspaper.pikiran-rakyat.com/prprint.php?mib=beritadetail&amp;id=81605" target="_blank" class="link link--external" rel="nofollow noopener">PIKIRAN RAKYAT - PT DI Akan Produksi Pesawat Amfibi</a><br />
<br />
I'm sorry the link is in local newspaper, but in short it's said that the Indonesian Aerospaces (PT. DI) will build (under license) with Dornier a light amphibious plane.<br />
<br />
The DI spokesman says the plane will have capacities for 14 passanger (outside the pilot) and have two engines.<br />
Try to find the info in dornier site, still has not find the relevant...<br />
<br />
<a href="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/indonesian-aero-news.9220/" class="link link--internal">Indonesian Aero News</a></div>]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>3669</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Indonesia:  'green water navy'</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 12:58:33 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/indonesia-green-water-navy.3897/</link>
      <guid>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/indonesia-green-water-navy.3897/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (Supe)</author>
      <category domain="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/navy-maritime.22/"><![CDATA[Navy & Maritime]]></category>
      <dc:creator>Supe</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="bbWrapper">After reading this (quite interesting) <a href="http://www.strategypage.com/messageboards/messages/512-12402.asp" target="_blank" class="link link--external" rel="nofollow noopener"> thread</a> on Indonesian aspirations for a 'green water navy' , it left me wondering about the capabilities of the Indonesian Navy as it stands now and the direction it wants to take. <a href="http://www.hazegray.org/worldnav/asiapac/indones.htm" target="_blank" class="link link--external" rel="nofollow noopener">World Navies today</a> website  lists quite a few assets, particularly of amphibious ships. It looks like they have a decent amphibious...<br />
<br />
<a href="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/indonesia-green-water-navy.3897/" class="link link--internal">Indonesia:  'green water navy'</a></div>]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>3557</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ADF General discussion thread</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 12:37:41 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/adf-general-discussion-thread.11750/</link>
      <guid>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/adf-general-discussion-thread.11750/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (Todjaeger)</author>
      <category domain="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/geostrategic-issues.47/"><![CDATA[Geostrategic Issues]]></category>
      <dc:creator>Todjaeger</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="bbWrapper">With the recent release of the interim <a href="http://www.defence.gov.au/oscdf/adf-posture-review/docs/interim/default.htm" target="_blank" class="link link--external" rel="nofollow noopener">ADF Posture Review</a>, it was IMO rightly suggested that a general ADF discussion thread should be created.  Having looked at some of the recommendations and how some appear to be tri-service in nature, it seemed like a non-service specific thread would be good.<br />
<br />
Having done a quick read through, a few things do jump out at me.<br />
<br />
One of the first was the suggestion...<br />
<br />
<a href="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/adf-general-discussion-thread.11750/" class="link link--internal">ADF General discussion thread</a></div>]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>3973</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Australian Army Discussions and Updates</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 04:16:08 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/australian-army-discussions-and-updates.5526/</link>
      <guid>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/australian-army-discussions-and-updates.5526/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (mickk)</author>
      <category domain="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/army-security-forces.21/"><![CDATA[Army & Security Forces]]></category>
      <dc:creator>mickk</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="bbWrapper">James Button, London<br />
November 24, 2006<br />
<br />


	
	
		
		
	


	<div class="lbContainer lbContainer--inline " title=""
		data-xf-init="lightbox"
		data-lb-single-image="1"
		data-lb-container-zoom="1"
		data-lb-trigger=".js-lbImage-_xfUid-1-1781118072"
		data-lb-id="_xfUid-1-1781118072">
		
			<div class="lbContainer-zoomer js-lbImage-_xfUid-1-1781118072" data-src="http://i10.tinypic.com/2heeouc.jpg" aria-label="Zoom"></div>
		
		<img src="http://i10.tinypic.com/2heeouc.jpg" data-url="http://i10.tinypic.com/2heeouc.jpg" class="bbImage" data-zoom-target="1"  style="" />
	</div>

<br />
<br />
HE REMEMBERS every detail: a massive explosion in the helicopter, a smell of cordite, bullets ricocheting off the walls, his door gunner trying to get a shot at their attackers, and his co-pilot noticing blood pooling in his lap and realising he had been shot through the chest.<br />
<br />
&quot;He was amazing,&quot; Scott Watkins says of his co-pilot that day in Iraq, Keith Reesby, whose heart escaped a bullet by two...<br />
<br />
<a href="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/australian-army-discussions-and-updates.5526/" class="link link--internal">Australian Army Discussions and Updates</a></div>]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>12236</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Russia - General Discussion.</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2026 16:51:07 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/russia-general-discussion.14791/</link>
      <guid>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/russia-general-discussion.14791/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (Feanor)</author>
      <category domain="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/geostrategic-issues.47/"><![CDATA[Geostrategic Issues]]></category>
      <dc:creator>Feanor</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="bbWrapper">I think this pair of articles by Pukhov make an excellent point regarding the current deterioration of relations between Russia and the west, Russia and NATO, and Russia and the US. I think that essentially Pukhov is correct in thinking that whoever replaces Putin is going to be no softer or more amenable to the West. In fact a number of people in the current government have significantly stronger anti-western sentiment, and that there is a good chance that Putin will be remembered as a...<br />
<br />
<a href="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/russia-general-discussion.14791/" class="link link--internal">Russia - General Discussion.</a></div>]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>2982</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Military Aviation News and Discussion</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2026 14:50:21 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/military-aviation-news-and-discussion.13643/</link>
      <guid>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/military-aviation-news-and-discussion.13643/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (ngatimozart)</author>
      <category domain="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/air-force-aviation.20/"><![CDATA[Air Force & Aviation]]></category>
      <dc:creator>ngatimozart</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="bbWrapper">I've started this thread so that military aviation news can be posted and discussed. this is more about the equipment in general rather than placing it in one another air force's and / or navy's thread. This way it isn't repeated or lost. This is <b>not an aircraft vs another aircraft argument thread</b> - see the <a href="http://www.defencetalk.com/forums/air-force-aviation/why-vs-platform-discussions-unproductive-13165/#post280996" class="link link--internal">guidance</a>.</div>]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>1248</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>PRC Peoples Liberation Army Navy</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2026 13:44:58 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/prc-peoples-liberation-army-navy.14534/</link>
      <guid>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/prc-peoples-liberation-army-navy.14534/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (Wall83)</author>
      <category domain="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/navy-maritime.22/"><![CDATA[Navy & Maritime]]></category>
      <dc:creator>Wall83</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="bbWrapper">China are once again deploying new resources to its navy.<br />
The last month 1 large amphibius transport landing dock (Type-071) has been launched. 2 possible 4 new Type-052C air defence destroyers are under construction with 2 ready to be launched.<br />
The modern Type-054A missile frigate are in serial production with atleast 12 ships ready by the end of 2010. Then add the rumors about a new large corvette class (Type-056) and that the work on the aircraft carrier Varyag has been speeded up...<br />
<br />
<a href="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/prc-peoples-liberation-army-navy.14534/" class="link link--internal">PRC Peoples Liberation Army Navy</a></div>]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>1003</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Royal New Zealand Navy Discussions and Updates</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2026 23:41:04 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/royal-new-zealand-navy-discussions-and-updates.4854/</link>
      <guid>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/royal-new-zealand-navy-discussions-and-updates.4854/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (Padman)</author>
      <category domain="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/navy-maritime.22/"><![CDATA[Navy & Maritime]]></category>
      <dc:creator>Padman</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="bbWrapper">Protector Update<br />
The Navy’s new Multi-Role Vessel (pictured right), to be named CANTERBURY, has a vehicle capacity for up to 40 NZLAVs (the Army’s new armoured fighting vehicle) along with an embarked force of up to 250 personnel.<br />
<br />
The MRV’s commercial design heritage provides a comfortable and flexible level of accommodation for the embarked force, utilising a series of 12 berth cabins (four sets of bunks three deep) which are located in the superstructure on the same level as the flight...<br />
<br />
<a href="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/royal-new-zealand-navy-discussions-and-updates.4854/" class="link link--internal">Royal New Zealand Navy Discussions and Updates</a></div>]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>9901</slash:comments>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>