<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="no"?><rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Defense Forum at DefenceTalk.com</title>
    <description>Global Defense forum, discuss topics on air force, army, navy, missiles and global military news updates in internet's most professional defence forum.</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2026 06:20:26 +0000</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2026 06:20:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>Defence Forum &amp; Military Photos - DefenceTalk</generator>
    <link>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/</link>
    <atom:link href="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/-/index.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Royal Australian Navy Discussions and Updates 2.0</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2026 05:29:07 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/royal-australian-navy-discussions-and-updates-2-0.15429/</link>
      <guid>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/royal-australian-navy-discussions-and-updates-2-0.15429/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (OPSSG)</author>
      <category domain="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/navy-maritime.22/"><![CDATA[Navy & Maritime]]></category>
      <dc:creator>OPSSG</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="bbWrapper"><b><span style="color: rgb(65, 168, 95)">1.  This Royal Australian Navy Discussions and Updates 2.0 thread is a continuation of the</span> </b><a href="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/royal-australian-navy-discussions-and-updates.5905/" class="link link--internal"><b>older thread</b></a><b> <span style="color: rgb(65, 168, 95)">(starting 20 Nov 2021).  <b>The older RAN thread at 1,500+ pages is a bit too long and further discussions should continue here. Some prior posts before this was moved here from the RAN thread to seed future...</b></span></b><br />
<br />
<a href="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/royal-australian-navy-discussions-and-updates-2-0.15429/" class="link link--internal">Royal Australian Navy Discussions and Updates 2.0</a></div>]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>15474</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Middle East Defence &amp; Security</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2026 04:23:26 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/middle-east-defence-security.13210/</link>
      <guid>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/middle-east-defence-security.13210/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (MaenZ)</author>
      <category domain="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/geostrategic-issues.47/"><![CDATA[Geostrategic Issues]]></category>
      <dc:creator>MaenZ</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="bbWrapper">It's funny to call this a crisis because we have always been at war.<br />
<br />
Anyway, Does you have any strategic insight to share about the growing ISIL threat in the region?<br />
<br />
I'm particularly interested with Jordanian defense capability against the group. As voices inside Jordan claim that ISIL cannot possibly break into Jordanian defenses. However outside neutral sources claim that Jordan cannot handle ISIL on it's own.<br />
<br />
Jordan is claimed to be the best trained Arab fighting force on the...<br />
<br />
<a href="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/middle-east-defence-security.13210/" class="link link--internal">Middle East Defence &amp; Security</a></div>]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>2033</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Pakistan Air Force [PAF] News and Discussions</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2026 03:55:48 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/pakistan-air-force-paf-news-and-discussions.3751/</link>
      <guid>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/pakistan-air-force-paf-news-and-discussions.3751/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (P.A.F)</author>
      <category domain="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/air-force-aviation.20/"><![CDATA[Air Force & Aviation]]></category>
      <dc:creator>P.A.F</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="bbWrapper"><a href="http://www.zeenews.com/links/articles.asp?aid=216441&amp;sid=SAS" target="_blank" class="link link--external" rel="nofollow noopener">http://www.zeenews.com/links/articles.asp?aid=216441&amp;sid=SAS</a><br />
 <br />
Islamabad, May 10: Pakistan Air Force (PAF) has said that it would start manufacturing parts for us-based aircraft giant Boeing from next month which would enable it to formally join the club of aviation parts makers. <br />
<br />
<span style="font-family: 'verdana'"><span style="font-size: 10px">Air Marshal Aurengzeb, Chief of Pakistan Aeronautical Complex (PAC), Kamra, which was poised to manufacture JF-17...</span></span><br />
<br />
<a href="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/pakistan-air-force-paf-news-and-discussions.3751/" class="link link--internal">Pakistan Air Force [PAF] News and Discussions</a></div>]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>2462</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>AI / Robotics and the Rise of the Machines (Humanoid)</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2026 03:50:20 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/ai-robotics-and-the-rise-of-the-machines-humanoid.15965/</link>
      <guid>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/ai-robotics-and-the-rise-of-the-machines-humanoid.15965/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (koxinga)</author>
      <category domain="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/intros-off-topic.60/"><![CDATA[Intros & Off Topic]]></category>
      <dc:creator>koxinga</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="bbWrapper">We don't seem to have a dedicated thread on humanoid robots or to be more precise, embodied intelligence (combination of AI, autonomous sensors with a physical presence). <br />
<br />
Compared to the 90s / 2000s / 2010s, advancements in areas of electronics, battery technology, sensors and AI have enabled functionality that have practical implications and are moving beyond research labs into factories. <br />
<br />
Below from left, Figure 02 (Figure AI), Optimus (Tesla), Atlas (Boston Dynamics)<br />
<br />
[ATTACH...<br />
<br />
<a href="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/ai-robotics-and-the-rise-of-the-machines-humanoid.15965/" class="link link--internal">AI / Robotics and the Rise of the Machines (Humanoid)</a></div>]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Chinese Air Force (PLA-AF) News and Discussion</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2026 03:11:24 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/chinese-air-force-pla-af-news-and-discussion.13873/</link>
      <guid>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/chinese-air-force-pla-af-news-and-discussion.13873/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (ngatimozart)</author>
      <category domain="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/air-force-aviation.20/"><![CDATA[Air Force & Aviation]]></category>
      <dc:creator>ngatimozart</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="bbWrapper">I couldn't find a relevant thread so started this one.<br />
<br />
It appears that the Chinese are increasing their airlift capabilities significantly. It is being reported that they have reached agreement with the Ukraine to <a href="http://www.janes.com/article/63341/china-and-ukraine-agree-to-restart-an-225-production" target="_blank" class="link link--external" rel="noopener">restart production of the Antonov AN-225 Mriya</a> strategic airlifter. The AN-225 is the largest aircraft in the world at the moment and only one is flying; it being flown by...<br />
<br />
<a href="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/chinese-air-force-pla-af-news-and-discussion.13873/" class="link link--internal">Chinese Air Force (PLA-AF) News and Discussion</a></div>]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>196</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ADF General discussion thread</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2026 01:28:23 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/adf-general-discussion-thread.11750/</link>
      <guid>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/adf-general-discussion-thread.11750/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (Todjaeger)</author>
      <category domain="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/geostrategic-issues.47/"><![CDATA[Geostrategic Issues]]></category>
      <dc:creator>Todjaeger</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="bbWrapper">With the recent release of the interim <a href="http://www.defence.gov.au/oscdf/adf-posture-review/docs/interim/default.htm" target="_blank" class="link link--external" rel="nofollow noopener">ADF Posture Review</a>, it was IMO rightly suggested that a general ADF discussion thread should be created.  Having looked at some of the recommendations and how some appear to be tri-service in nature, it seemed like a non-service specific thread would be good.<br />
<br />
Having done a quick read through, a few things do jump out at me.<br />
<br />
One of the first was the suggestion...<br />
<br />
<a href="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/adf-general-discussion-thread.11750/" class="link link--internal">ADF General discussion thread</a></div>]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>4016</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Indonesia:  'green water navy'</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2026 00:05:55 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/indonesia-green-water-navy.3897/</link>
      <guid>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/indonesia-green-water-navy.3897/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (Supe)</author>
      <category domain="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/navy-maritime.22/"><![CDATA[Navy & Maritime]]></category>
      <dc:creator>Supe</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="bbWrapper">After reading this (quite interesting) <a href="http://www.strategypage.com/messageboards/messages/512-12402.asp" target="_blank" class="link link--external" rel="nofollow noopener"> thread</a> on Indonesian aspirations for a 'green water navy' , it left me wondering about the capabilities of the Indonesian Navy as it stands now and the direction it wants to take. <a href="http://www.hazegray.org/worldnav/asiapac/indones.htm" target="_blank" class="link link--external" rel="nofollow noopener">World Navies today</a> website  lists quite a few assets, particularly of amphibious ships. It looks like they have a decent amphibious...<br />
<br />
<a href="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/indonesia-green-water-navy.3897/" class="link link--internal">Indonesia:  'green water navy'</a></div>]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>3691</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Indonesian Army</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2026 00:00:38 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/the-indonesian-army.10167/</link>
      <guid>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/the-indonesian-army.10167/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (DavidDCM)</author>
      <category domain="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/army-security-forces.21/"><![CDATA[Army & Security Forces]]></category>
      <dc:creator>DavidDCM</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="bbWrapper">There are lots of threads in this forum related to the Singaporean and Malaysian Armed Forces, yet very few about the Indonesian military, despite being the biggest player in Southeast Asia.<br />
<br />
In the last few months there were quite a lot interesting new developments, which in my eyes are worth being discussed.<br />
<br />
One of the more interesting things that happened was a speech by the general who is the current commander of the Indonesian armored corps (or cavalry corps, as it is called in...<br />
<br />
<a href="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/the-indonesian-army.10167/" class="link link--internal">The Indonesian Army</a></div>]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>1423</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>International Army News Thread</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2026 23:47:22 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/international-army-news-thread.11932/</link>
      <guid>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/international-army-news-thread.11932/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (Haavarla)</author>
      <category domain="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/army-security-forces.21/"><![CDATA[Army & Security Forces]]></category>
      <dc:creator>Haavarla</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="bbWrapper">Seems Norway has order an upgrade and proccurment package from Sweeden on the current CV-90 and an deal on new CV-90 as well.<br />
<br />
<i>&quot;According to the MoD, the total value of the project is estimated to be less than NOK10bn ($1.74bn). Deliveries are scheduled to start in 2013 and are to be completed by 2018.&quot;</i><br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.army-technology.com/news/newsnorwegian-army-to-buy-new-cv90-ifvs-from-bae" target="_blank" class="link link--external" rel="nofollow noopener">Norwegian Army to buy new CV90 IFVs from BAE - Army Technology</a><br />
<br />
I think this is a...<br />
<br />
<a href="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/international-army-news-thread.11932/" class="link link--internal">International Army News Thread</a></div>]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>163</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Russian-Ukrainian War Thread</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2026 23:31:18 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/the-russian-ukrainian-war-thread.15283/</link>
      <guid>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/the-russian-ukrainian-war-thread.15283/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (Feanor)</author>
      <category domain="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/geostrategic-issues.47/"><![CDATA[Geostrategic Issues]]></category>
      <dc:creator>Feanor</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="bbWrapper">I tried looking for the last one of these we had but it seems to be buried pretty deep, so I'll start a new one. This is a catchall thread for the ongoing military and geo-strategic stalemate in eastern Ukraine.<br />
<br />
As of late there have been increasing indicators that something might be brewing. Mostly pro-Russian sources have been pointing out increasing movements of Ukrainian troops, including armor, towards the front line. Now there are indications of rearmament of frontline units with...<br />
<br />
<a href="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/the-russian-ukrainian-war-thread.15283/" class="link link--internal">The Russian-Ukrainian War Thread</a></div>]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>15184</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Indonesian Aero News</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2026 23:06:40 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/indonesian-aero-news.9220/</link>
      <guid>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/indonesian-aero-news.9220/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (Ananda)</author>
      <category domain="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/air-force-aviation.20/"><![CDATA[Air Force & Aviation]]></category>
      <dc:creator>Ananda</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="bbWrapper"><a href="http://newspaper.pikiran-rakyat.com/prprint.php?mib=beritadetail&amp;id=81605" target="_blank" class="link link--external" rel="nofollow noopener">PIKIRAN RAKYAT - PT DI Akan Produksi Pesawat Amfibi</a><br />
<br />
I'm sorry the link is in local newspaper, but in short it's said that the Indonesian Aerospaces (PT. DI) will build (under license) with Dornier a light amphibious plane.<br />
<br />
The DI spokesman says the plane will have capacities for 14 passanger (outside the pilot) and have two engines.<br />
Try to find the info in dornier site, still has not find the relevant...<br />
<br />
<a href="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/indonesian-aero-news.9220/" class="link link--internal">Indonesian Aero News</a></div>]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>3813</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Royal New Zealand Navy Discussions and Updates</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2026 21:58:37 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/royal-new-zealand-navy-discussions-and-updates.4854/</link>
      <guid>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/royal-new-zealand-navy-discussions-and-updates.4854/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (Padman)</author>
      <category domain="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/navy-maritime.22/"><![CDATA[Navy & Maritime]]></category>
      <dc:creator>Padman</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="bbWrapper">Protector Update<br />
The Navy’s new Multi-Role Vessel (pictured right), to be named CANTERBURY, has a vehicle capacity for up to 40 NZLAVs (the Army’s new armoured fighting vehicle) along with an embarked force of up to 250 personnel.<br />
<br />
The MRV’s commercial design heritage provides a comfortable and flexible level of accommodation for the embarked force, utilising a series of 12 berth cabins (four sets of bunks three deep) which are located in the superstructure on the same level as the flight...<br />
<br />
<a href="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/royal-new-zealand-navy-discussions-and-updates.4854/" class="link link--internal">Royal New Zealand Navy Discussions and Updates</a></div>]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>9957</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>IRIS² European Satcom Constellation</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2026 15:47:24 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/iris-european-satcom-constellation.15669/</link>
      <guid>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/iris-european-satcom-constellation.15669/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (kato)</author>
      <category domain="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/space-technology.32/"><![CDATA[Space Technology]]></category>
      <dc:creator>kato</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="bbWrapper">The EU Council has signed off on financing IRIS²:<br />
<br />



<div class="bbMediaJustifier bbCode-tweet"
	  data-xf-init="tweet"
	  data-tweet-id="1593541046952148992"
	  data-lang="en-US"
	  data-theme="light"
	  ><a href="https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1593541046952148992" rel="external" target="_blank">
	<i class="fab fa-twitter" aria-hidden="true"></i> https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1593541046952148992</a></div><br />
IRIS² is intended to be a communications satellite constellation that:<br />
<ul>
<li data-xf-list-type="ul">will consist of up to 200 satellites in low-earth orbit</li>
<li data-xf-list-type="ul">will provide secure communications and internet backbone functionality for the European Union, including quantum-key encryption</li>
<li data-xf-list-type="ul">will also explicitly be used for both governmental and military purposes</li>
<li data-xf-list-type="ul">is explicitly intended to make Europe independent of...</li>
</ul><br />
<a href="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/iris-european-satcom-constellation.15669/" class="link link--internal">IRIS² European Satcom Constellation</a></div>]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Military Aviation News and Discussion</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2026 08:09:30 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/military-aviation-news-and-discussion.13643/</link>
      <guid>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/military-aviation-news-and-discussion.13643/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (ngatimozart)</author>
      <category domain="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/air-force-aviation.20/"><![CDATA[Air Force & Aviation]]></category>
      <dc:creator>ngatimozart</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="bbWrapper">I've started this thread so that military aviation news can be posted and discussed. this is more about the equipment in general rather than placing it in one another air force's and / or navy's thread. This way it isn't repeated or lost. This is <b>not an aircraft vs another aircraft argument thread</b> - see the <a href="http://www.defencetalk.com/forums/air-force-aviation/why-vs-platform-discussions-unproductive-13165/#post280996" class="link link--internal">guidance</a>.</div>]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>1262</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Turkish Air Force -   Türk Hava Kuvvetleri</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2026 07:55:37 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/turkish-air-force-tuerk-hava-kuvvetleri.3768/</link>
      <guid>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/turkish-air-force-tuerk-hava-kuvvetleri.3768/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (musti)</author>
      <category domain="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/air-force-aviation.20/"><![CDATA[Air Force & Aviation]]></category>
      <dc:creator>musti</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="bbWrapper"><b>AIR FORCES COMMAND</b> <br />
<br />
Total Personnel: 60.000<br />
Reserves: 65.000<br />
<br />
<b>Structure:</b><br />
<br />
Four main commands: 1st Tactical Air Force Command (HQ Eskisehir), 2nd Tactical Air Force Command (HQ Diyarbakir), Air Training Command, Air Logistics Command.<br />
<br />
<b>TACTICAL FIGHTER AIRCRAFT</b><br />
<br />
TYPE-NUMBER-REMARKS<br />
<br />
F 16C/D Fighting Falcon Block 50 - 76 - Peace Onyx II program, assembled in Turkey.<br />
<br />
F 16C/D Fighting Falcon Block 40 - 104 - Peace Onyx I program, assembled in Turkey.<br />
<br />
F 16C/D Fighting...<br />
<br />
<a href="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/turkish-air-force-tuerk-hava-kuvvetleri.3768/" class="link link--internal">Turkish Air Force -   Türk Hava Kuvvetleri</a></div>]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>95</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Japanese Maritime Self Defense Force Thread</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2026 04:49:20 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/japanese-maritime-self-defense-force-thread.11488/</link>
      <guid>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/japanese-maritime-self-defense-force-thread.11488/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (gf0012-aust)</author>
      <category domain="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/navy-maritime.22/"><![CDATA[Navy & Maritime]]></category>
      <dc:creator>gf0012-aust</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="bbWrapper">New Helicopter Carrier for Japanese Navy<br />
By Keith Henderson at October 11, 2011 07:35 <br />
Filed Under: Research &amp; Development <br />
<br />
Details of the propulsion system for the new Helicopter Carrier of the Japanese Navy / Maritime Self-Defence Force (JMSDF) have been announced. To be built by IHI of Tokyo, the LOA 814 ft (248 m) and beam of 124 ft (38 m) vessel will have a fully loaded displacement of around 27,500 tons. The official Japanese 22DDH designation of the ship is of a “destroyer” but...<br />
<br />
<a href="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/japanese-maritime-self-defense-force-thread.11488/" class="link link--internal">Japanese Maritime Self Defense Force Thread</a></div>]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>676</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>United States Defense Thread</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2026 18:02:05 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/united-states-defense-thread.14212/</link>
      <guid>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/united-states-defense-thread.14212/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (ngatimozart)</author>
      <category domain="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/geostrategic-issues.47/"><![CDATA[Geostrategic Issues]]></category>
      <dc:creator>ngatimozart</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="bbWrapper">A catchall thread for general US defence related topics that involve more than one US Service; USN, USMC, US Army and USCG.</div>]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>377</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Royal Australian Air Force [RAAF] News, Discussions and Updates</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2026 00:58:57 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/royal-australian-air-force-raaf-news-discussions-and-updates.6007/</link>
      <guid>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/royal-australian-air-force-raaf-news-discussions-and-updates.6007/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (Todjaeger)</author>
      <category domain="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/air-force-aviation.20/"><![CDATA[Air Force & Aviation]]></category>
      <dc:creator>Todjaeger</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="bbWrapper">Thought I'd start a general RAAF thread, since many of the existing ones end up shifting back and forth despite the initial start of the topic.  That and I have a question that doesn't quite seem to pertain to any active thread at present.<br />
<br />
Currently the Project Wedgetail (AIR 5077) for the E-737 is ongoing but behind 18+ months.  Delivery from what I've last read is now expected in early 2010, although some are already in Australia.  As part of the program, 4 were ordered, with options...<br />
<br />
<a href="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/royal-australian-air-force-raaf-news-discussions-and-updates.6007/" class="link link--internal">Royal Australian Air Force [RAAF] News, Discussions and Updates</a></div>]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>10607</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>USAF News and Discussion</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2026 22:17:28 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/usaf-news-and-discussion.12722/</link>
      <guid>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/usaf-news-and-discussion.12722/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (RobWilliams)</author>
      <category domain="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/air-force-aviation.20/"><![CDATA[Air Force & Aviation]]></category>
      <dc:creator>RobWilliams</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="bbWrapper">I searched for an appropriate thread like this but couldn't find one. May as well create one, can't stand it on other forums where a thread is created every time a piece of news comes out.<br />
<br />
Anyway, interesting article about the role of the USAF in a potential Syrian intervention. The jist of it being that considering how the current plans are going (i.e limited cruise missile strikes) that their inventory of fighters, bombers &amp; the like most probably won't be needed. Meaning that the USAF...<br />
<br />
<a href="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/usaf-news-and-discussion.12722/" class="link link--internal">USAF News and Discussion</a></div>]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>1034</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>US Navy News and updates</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2026 12:38:13 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/us-navy-news-and-updates.7961/</link>
      <guid>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/us-navy-news-and-updates.7961/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (AegisFC)</author>
      <category domain="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/navy-maritime.22/"><![CDATA[Navy & Maritime]]></category>
      <dc:creator>AegisFC</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="bbWrapper">Navy Secretary Donald Winter announced Friday that the new amphibious assault ship known as LHA 6 would be named America, granting the wish of veterans of the aircraft carrier America, who have lobbied for another ship to take the name after theirs was sunk as a target in 2005.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.navytimes.com/news/2008/06/navy_america_name_063008w/" target="_blank" class="link link--external" rel="noopener">http://www.navytimes.com/news/2008/06/navy_america_name_063008w/</a><br />
<br />




<blockquote class="bbCodeBlock bbCodeBlock--expandable bbCodeBlock--quote">
	
	<div class="bbCodeBlock-content">
		
		<div class="bbCodeBlock-expandContent ">
			New amphib to be named America<br />
<br />
By Philip Ewing - Staff writer<br />
Posted : Wednesday Jul 2, 2008 13:13:02 EDT<br />
<br />
Navy Secretary Donald...
		</div>
		<div class="bbCodeBlock-expandLink"><a>Click to expand...</a></div>
	</div>
</blockquote><a href="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/us-navy-news-and-updates.7961/" class="link link--internal">US Navy News and updates</a></div>]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>4068</slash:comments>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>