<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="no"?><rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Defense Forum at DefenceTalk.com</title>
    <description>Global Defense forum, discuss topics on air force, army, navy, missiles and global military news updates in internet's most professional defence forum.</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2026 15:36:29 +0000</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 May 2026 15:36:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>Defence Forum &amp; Military Photos - DefenceTalk</generator>
    <link>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/</link>
    <atom:link href="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/-/index.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>European Union, member states and Agencies</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2026 14:47:31 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/european-union-member-states-and-agencies.15723/</link>
      <guid>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/european-union-member-states-and-agencies.15723/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (SolarisKenzo)</author>
      <category domain="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/geostrategic-issues.47/"><![CDATA[Geostrategic Issues]]></category>
      <dc:creator>SolarisKenzo</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="bbWrapper">As a result of the tragic 2015 European migrant crisis, the European Union decided to create its first Standing Corp: The European Border and Coast Guard Agency, also known as Frontex ( wich was the name of the previous agency that was replaced ).<br />
<br />

	

	<div class="bbCodeBlock bbCodeBlock--unfurl    js-unfurl fauxBlockLink"
		data-unfurl="true" data-result-id="33159" data-url="https://frontex.europa.eu/" data-host="frontex.europa.eu" data-pending="false">
		<div class="contentRow">
			
			<div class="contentRow-main">
				<h3 class="contentRow-header js-unfurl-title">
					<a href="https://frontex.europa.eu/"
						class="link link--external fauxBlockLink-blockLink"
						target="_blank"
						rel="nofollow noopener"
						data-proxy-href="">
						Frontex | European Union Agency
					</a>
				</h3>

				<div class="contentRow-snippet js-unfurl-desc">Frontex promotes, coordinates and develops European border management in line with the EU fundamental rights charter applying the concept of Integrated Border Management.</div>

				<div class="contentRow-minor contentRow-minor--hideLinks">
					<span class="js-unfurl-favicon">
						
					</span>
					frontex.europa.eu
				</div>
			</div>
		</div>
	</div>
<br />
Frontex is de iure and de facto a Federal Agency, with its own standing corp and officers.<br />
<br />
Its HQ is in Warsaw.<br />
<br />
While being almost unknown outside of the EU, Frontex is the fastest growing...<br />
<br />
<a href="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/european-union-member-states-and-agencies.15723/" class="link link--internal">European Union, member states and Agencies</a></div>]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>334</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Indonesian Army</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2026 13:47:36 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/the-indonesian-army.10167/</link>
      <guid>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/the-indonesian-army.10167/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (DavidDCM)</author>
      <category domain="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/army-security-forces.21/"><![CDATA[Army & Security Forces]]></category>
      <dc:creator>DavidDCM</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="bbWrapper">There are lots of threads in this forum related to the Singaporean and Malaysian Armed Forces, yet very few about the Indonesian military, despite being the biggest player in Southeast Asia.<br />
<br />
In the last few months there were quite a lot interesting new developments, which in my eyes are worth being discussed.<br />
<br />
One of the more interesting things that happened was a speech by the general who is the current commander of the Indonesian armored corps (or cavalry corps, as it is called in...<br />
<br />
<a href="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/the-indonesian-army.10167/" class="link link--internal">The Indonesian Army</a></div>]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>1382</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Indonesian Aero News</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2026 13:41:41 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/indonesian-aero-news.9220/</link>
      <guid>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/indonesian-aero-news.9220/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (Ananda)</author>
      <category domain="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/air-force-aviation.20/"><![CDATA[Air Force & Aviation]]></category>
      <dc:creator>Ananda</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="bbWrapper"><a href="http://newspaper.pikiran-rakyat.com/prprint.php?mib=beritadetail&amp;id=81605" target="_blank" class="link link--external" rel="nofollow noopener">PIKIRAN RAKYAT - PT DI Akan Produksi Pesawat Amfibi</a><br />
<br />
I'm sorry the link is in local newspaper, but in short it's said that the Indonesian Aerospaces (PT. DI) will build (under license) with Dornier a light amphibious plane.<br />
<br />
The DI spokesman says the plane will have capacities for 14 passanger (outside the pilot) and have two engines.<br />
Try to find the info in dornier site, still has not find the relevant...<br />
<br />
<a href="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/indonesian-aero-news.9220/" class="link link--internal">Indonesian Aero News</a></div>]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>3655</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Royal New Zealand Navy Discussions and Updates</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2026 13:35:11 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/royal-new-zealand-navy-discussions-and-updates.4854/</link>
      <guid>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/royal-new-zealand-navy-discussions-and-updates.4854/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (Padman)</author>
      <category domain="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/navy-maritime.22/"><![CDATA[Navy & Maritime]]></category>
      <dc:creator>Padman</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="bbWrapper">Protector Update<br />
The Navy’s new Multi-Role Vessel (pictured right), to be named CANTERBURY, has a vehicle capacity for up to 40 NZLAVs (the Army’s new armoured fighting vehicle) along with an embarked force of up to 250 personnel.<br />
<br />
The MRV’s commercial design heritage provides a comfortable and flexible level of accommodation for the embarked force, utilising a series of 12 berth cabins (four sets of bunks three deep) which are located in the superstructure on the same level as the flight...<br />
<br />
<a href="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/royal-new-zealand-navy-discussions-and-updates.4854/" class="link link--internal">Royal New Zealand Navy Discussions and Updates</a></div>]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>9798</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Royal Australian Navy Discussions and Updates 2.0</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2026 11:14:41 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/royal-australian-navy-discussions-and-updates-2-0.15429/</link>
      <guid>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/royal-australian-navy-discussions-and-updates-2-0.15429/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (OPSSG)</author>
      <category domain="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/navy-maritime.22/"><![CDATA[Navy & Maritime]]></category>
      <dc:creator>OPSSG</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="bbWrapper"><b><span style="color: rgb(65, 168, 95)">1.  This Royal Australian Navy Discussions and Updates 2.0 thread is a continuation of the</span> </b><a href="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/royal-australian-navy-discussions-and-updates.5905/" class="link link--internal"><b>older thread</b></a><b> <span style="color: rgb(65, 168, 95)">(starting 20 Nov 2021).  <b>The older RAN thread at 1,500+ pages is a bit too long and further discussions should continue here. Some prior posts before this was moved here from the RAN thread to seed future...</b></span></b><br />
<br />
<a href="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/royal-australian-navy-discussions-and-updates-2-0.15429/" class="link link--internal">Royal Australian Navy Discussions and Updates 2.0</a></div>]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>14841</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Australian Army Discussions and Updates</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2026 11:12:42 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/australian-army-discussions-and-updates.5526/</link>
      <guid>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/australian-army-discussions-and-updates.5526/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (mickk)</author>
      <category domain="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/army-security-forces.21/"><![CDATA[Army & Security Forces]]></category>
      <dc:creator>mickk</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="bbWrapper">James Button, London<br />
November 24, 2006<br />
<br />


	
	
		
		
	


	<div class="lbContainer lbContainer--inline " title=""
		data-xf-init="lightbox"
		data-lb-single-image="1"
		data-lb-container-zoom="1"
		data-lb-trigger=".js-lbImage-_xfUid-1-1779118589"
		data-lb-id="_xfUid-1-1779118589">
		
			<div class="lbContainer-zoomer js-lbImage-_xfUid-1-1779118589" data-src="http://i10.tinypic.com/2heeouc.jpg" aria-label="Zoom"></div>
		
		<img src="http://i10.tinypic.com/2heeouc.jpg" data-url="http://i10.tinypic.com/2heeouc.jpg" class="bbImage" data-zoom-target="1"  style="" />
	</div>

<br />
<br />
HE REMEMBERS every detail: a massive explosion in the helicopter, a smell of cordite, bullets ricocheting off the walls, his door gunner trying to get a shot at their attackers, and his co-pilot noticing blood pooling in his lap and realising he had been shot through the chest.<br />
<br />
&quot;He was amazing,&quot; Scott Watkins says of his co-pilot that day in Iraq, Keith Reesby, whose heart escaped a bullet by two...<br />
<br />
<a href="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/australian-army-discussions-and-updates.5526/" class="link link--internal">Australian Army Discussions and Updates</a></div>]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>12220</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Military Aviation News and Discussion</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2026 08:52:18 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/military-aviation-news-and-discussion.13643/</link>
      <guid>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/military-aviation-news-and-discussion.13643/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (ngatimozart)</author>
      <category domain="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/air-force-aviation.20/"><![CDATA[Air Force & Aviation]]></category>
      <dc:creator>ngatimozart</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="bbWrapper">I've started this thread so that military aviation news can be posted and discussed. this is more about the equipment in general rather than placing it in one another air force's and / or navy's thread. This way it isn't repeated or lost. This is <b>not an aircraft vs another aircraft argument thread</b> - see the <a href="http://www.defencetalk.com/forums/air-force-aviation/why-vs-platform-discussions-unproductive-13165/#post280996" class="link link--internal">guidance</a>.</div>]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>1244</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Royal Navy Discussions and Updates</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 17 May 2026 18:37:40 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/the-royal-navy-discussions-and-updates.5679/</link>
      <guid>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/the-royal-navy-discussions-and-updates.5679/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (overlander)</author>
      <category domain="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/navy-maritime.22/"><![CDATA[Navy & Maritime]]></category>
      <dc:creator>overlander</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="bbWrapper">RN Year in Review - 2006<br />
...  the lowest priority<br />
<br />
24 December 2006<br />
<br />
Every year since 2000 I have  written an end of year wrap up ... and everyone is more depressing to write and read than the last.  Sadly 2006 is ending on a new low, with precious little good news and rumours of a yet another round of deep cuts getting ever stronger. <br />
<br />
In 2005 we had the Trafalgar bicentenary which at least forced many senior officials of the realm to pay some lip service to the Royal Navy, but 2006 didn't...<br />
<br />
<a href="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/the-royal-navy-discussions-and-updates.5679/" class="link link--internal">The Royal Navy Discussions and Updates</a></div>]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>14135</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Royal Malaysian Navy (RMN) update</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 17 May 2026 11:50:10 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/royal-malaysian-navy-rmn-update.8515/</link>
      <guid>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/royal-malaysian-navy-rmn-update.8515/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (Ding)</author>
      <category domain="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/navy-maritime.22/"><![CDATA[Navy & Maritime]]></category>
      <dc:creator>Ding</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="bbWrapper"><b>RMN capabilities and shortfalls</b><br />
<br />
The thread about RMAF future has been a great eye opener to me and, for me at least, it has been a great discussion platform to hear views from professionals and enthusiast. <br />
<br />
Here, to take up the suggestion by awang_se (i think) to start a discussion about the Royal Malaysian Navy, I'm starting this thread. And as a forum rule, I have to state my opinion first...correct?<img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite8" alt=":D" title="Big Grin    :D" data-shortname=":D" /> Okay<br />
<br />
RMN Inventory of Combat and support vessel:<br />
<br />
2x Lekiu Class FFG...<br />
<br />
<a href="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/royal-malaysian-navy-rmn-update.8515/" class="link link--internal">Royal Malaysian Navy (RMN) update</a></div>]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>701</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Royal Australian Air Force [RAAF] News, Discussions and Updates</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 17 May 2026 11:30:59 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/royal-australian-air-force-raaf-news-discussions-and-updates.6007/</link>
      <guid>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/royal-australian-air-force-raaf-news-discussions-and-updates.6007/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (Todjaeger)</author>
      <category domain="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/air-force-aviation.20/"><![CDATA[Air Force & Aviation]]></category>
      <dc:creator>Todjaeger</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="bbWrapper">Thought I'd start a general RAAF thread, since many of the existing ones end up shifting back and forth despite the initial start of the topic.  That and I have a question that doesn't quite seem to pertain to any active thread at present.<br />
<br />
Currently the Project Wedgetail (AIR 5077) for the E-737 is ongoing but behind 18+ months.  Delivery from what I've last read is now expected in early 2010, although some are already in Australia.  As part of the program, 4 were ordered, with options...<br />
<br />
<a href="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/royal-australian-air-force-raaf-news-discussions-and-updates.6007/" class="link link--internal">Royal Australian Air Force [RAAF] News, Discussions and Updates</a></div>]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>10468</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>General Naval News</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2026 22:45:30 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/general-naval-news.13220/</link>
      <guid>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/general-naval-news.13220/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (gf0012-aust)</author>
      <category domain="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/navy-maritime.22/"><![CDATA[Navy & Maritime]]></category>
      <dc:creator>gf0012-aust</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="bbWrapper"><a href="http://online.wsj.com/articles/saab-buys-submarine-builder-thyssenkrupp-marine-1404075873" target="_blank" class="link link--external" rel="noopener">Saab Buys Submarine Builder ThyssenKrupp Marine Systems AB - WSJ</a><br />
<br />
still subject to review by Swedish Govt and TK</div>]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>616</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Argentina Air Force News and Discussion</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2026 15:53:45 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/argentina-air-force-news-and-discussion.13403/</link>
      <guid>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/argentina-air-force-news-and-discussion.13403/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (RobWilliams)</author>
      <category domain="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/air-force-aviation.20/"><![CDATA[Air Force & Aviation]]></category>
      <dc:creator>RobWilliams</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="bbWrapper">Following previous stories about Argentinian procurement of Kfirs, M2000s, Gripens and Su-24's, Argentina and China have signed an agreement to form a working group to study the possible introduction of the JF-17 or J-10B into Argentinas air force.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.janes.com/article/48726/argentina-and-china-agree-fighter-aircraft-working-group" target="_blank" class="link link--external" rel="noopener">Argentina and China agree fighter aircraft working group - IHS Jane's 360</a><br />
<br />
If the option is exercised, a transfer of 14 aircraft is...<br />
<br />
<a href="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/argentina-air-force-news-and-discussion.13403/" class="link link--internal">Argentina Air Force News and Discussion</a></div>]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>192</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Russian-Ukrainian War Thread</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2026 21:40:48 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/the-russian-ukrainian-war-thread.15283/</link>
      <guid>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/the-russian-ukrainian-war-thread.15283/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (Feanor)</author>
      <category domain="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/geostrategic-issues.47/"><![CDATA[Geostrategic Issues]]></category>
      <dc:creator>Feanor</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="bbWrapper">I tried looking for the last one of these we had but it seems to be buried pretty deep, so I'll start a new one. This is a catchall thread for the ongoing military and geo-strategic stalemate in eastern Ukraine.<br />
<br />
As of late there have been increasing indicators that something might be brewing. Mostly pro-Russian sources have been pointing out increasing movements of Ukrainian troops, including armor, towards the front line. Now there are indications of rearmament of frontline units with...<br />
<br />
<a href="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/the-russian-ukrainian-war-thread.15283/" class="link link--internal">The Russian-Ukrainian War Thread</a></div>]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>14337</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>F-35 Program - General Discussion</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2026 01:29:35 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/f-35-program-general-discussion.12487/</link>
      <guid>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/f-35-program-general-discussion.12487/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (OPSSG)</author>
      <category domain="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/air-force-aviation.20/"><![CDATA[Air Force & Aviation]]></category>
      <dc:creator>OPSSG</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="bbWrapper">Dear Members,<br />
<br />
In view of the length of the old <a href="http://www.defencetalk.com/forums/air-force-aviation/f-35-multirole-joint-strike-fighter-2013-206/" class="link link--internal">F-35 Discussion thread (at 206 pages)</a>, the Mod Team have decided to close the old thread. From today onwards, members can continue their F-35 discussions in new threads. To organise these discussions, we have decided to split these discussions into three threads namely:<br />
<br />
<div style="margin-left: 20px">(i) <b><span style="color: DarkGreen">F-35 Program - General...</span></b>&#8203;</div><br />
<a href="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/f-35-program-general-discussion.12487/" class="link link--internal">F-35 Program - General Discussion</a></div>]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>1606</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>US Navy News and updates</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2026 11:52:47 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/us-navy-news-and-updates.7961/</link>
      <guid>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/us-navy-news-and-updates.7961/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (AegisFC)</author>
      <category domain="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/navy-maritime.22/"><![CDATA[Navy & Maritime]]></category>
      <dc:creator>AegisFC</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="bbWrapper">Navy Secretary Donald Winter announced Friday that the new amphibious assault ship known as LHA 6 would be named America, granting the wish of veterans of the aircraft carrier America, who have lobbied for another ship to take the name after theirs was sunk as a target in 2005.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.navytimes.com/news/2008/06/navy_america_name_063008w/" target="_blank" class="link link--external" rel="noopener">http://www.navytimes.com/news/2008/06/navy_america_name_063008w/</a><br />
<br />




<blockquote class="bbCodeBlock bbCodeBlock--expandable bbCodeBlock--quote">
	
	<div class="bbCodeBlock-content">
		
		<div class="bbCodeBlock-expandContent ">
			New amphib to be named America<br />
<br />
By Philip Ewing - Staff writer<br />
Posted : Wednesday Jul 2, 2008 13:13:02 EDT<br />
<br />
Navy Secretary Donald...
		</div>
		<div class="bbCodeBlock-expandLink"><a>Click to expand...</a></div>
	</div>
</blockquote><a href="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/us-navy-news-and-updates.7961/" class="link link--internal">US Navy News and updates</a></div>]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>4003</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>AUKUS</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2026 11:19:42 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/aukus.15775/</link>
      <guid>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/aukus.15775/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (ngatimozart)</author>
      <category domain="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/geostrategic-issues.47/"><![CDATA[Geostrategic Issues]]></category>
      <dc:creator>ngatimozart</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="bbWrapper">Catch all thread for AUKUS.<br />
<br />
It appears that US$5.3 billion is to be spent on Australian naval bases. This appears to be the opening investment. The biggest amount is going to Fleet Bay West (FBW), HMAS Stirling.<br />
<div class="bbMediaWrapper">
	<div class="bbMediaWrapper-inner">
		<iframe src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/6kAwaIhR9Ps?wmode=opaque&start=0"
				width="560" height="315"
				frameborder="0" allowfullscreen="true"></iframe>
	</div>
</div></div>]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>104</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Middle East Defence &amp; Security</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2026 07:37:13 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/middle-east-defence-security.13210/</link>
      <guid>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/middle-east-defence-security.13210/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (MaenZ)</author>
      <category domain="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/geostrategic-issues.47/"><![CDATA[Geostrategic Issues]]></category>
      <dc:creator>MaenZ</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="bbWrapper">It's funny to call this a crisis because we have always been at war.<br />
<br />
Anyway, Does you have any strategic insight to share about the growing ISIL threat in the region?<br />
<br />
I'm particularly interested with Jordanian defense capability against the group. As voices inside Jordan claim that ISIL cannot possibly break into Jordanian defenses. However outside neutral sources claim that Jordan cannot handle ISIL on it's own.<br />
<br />
Jordan is claimed to be the best trained Arab fighting force on the...<br />
<br />
<a href="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/middle-east-defence-security.13210/" class="link link--internal">Middle East Defence &amp; Security</a></div>]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>1956</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>United States Defense Thread</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2026 03:43:12 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/united-states-defense-thread.14212/</link>
      <guid>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/united-states-defense-thread.14212/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (ngatimozart)</author>
      <category domain="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/geostrategic-issues.47/"><![CDATA[Geostrategic Issues]]></category>
      <dc:creator>ngatimozart</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="bbWrapper">A catchall thread for general US defence related topics that involve more than one US Service; USN, USMC, US Army and USCG.</div>]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>363</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>US Army News and updates general discussion</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2026 03:38:14 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/us-army-news-and-updates-general-discussion.13588/</link>
      <guid>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/us-army-news-and-updates-general-discussion.13588/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (Ranger25)</author>
      <category domain="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/army-security-forces.21/"><![CDATA[Army & Security Forces]]></category>
      <dc:creator>Ranger25</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="bbWrapper">LTG MacMaster recently gave a hint of the overall procurement direction he wants to move the U.S. army in.  He will,give a full description at the upcoming AUSA meeting. <br />
<br />
In brief, he wants to add greater lethality after the previous ten years focus in ME wars were more geared to vehicle protection.  Most interesting was his desire to procure &quot;off the shelf&quot; technology to readily equip new Brigade teams.  <br />
<br />
He also stated he wants upgrade he current Styker units to more heavily armed...<br />
<br />
<a href="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/us-army-news-and-updates-general-discussion.13588/" class="link link--internal">US Army News and updates general discussion</a></div>]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>611</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>International Army News Thread</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2026 15:41:01 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/international-army-news-thread.11932/</link>
      <guid>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/international-army-news-thread.11932/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (Haavarla)</author>
      <category domain="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/army-security-forces.21/"><![CDATA[Army & Security Forces]]></category>
      <dc:creator>Haavarla</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="bbWrapper">Seems Norway has order an upgrade and proccurment package from Sweeden on the current CV-90 and an deal on new CV-90 as well.<br />
<br />
<i>&quot;According to the MoD, the total value of the project is estimated to be less than NOK10bn ($1.74bn). Deliveries are scheduled to start in 2013 and are to be completed by 2018.&quot;</i><br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.army-technology.com/news/newsnorwegian-army-to-buy-new-cv90-ifvs-from-bae" target="_blank" class="link link--external" rel="nofollow noopener">Norwegian Army to buy new CV90 IFVs from BAE - Army Technology</a><br />
<br />
I think this is a...<br />
<br />
<a href="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/international-army-news-thread.11932/" class="link link--internal">International Army News Thread</a></div>]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>144</slash:comments>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>