<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="no"?><rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Defense Forum at DefenceTalk.com</title>
    <description>Global Defense forum, discuss topics on air force, army, navy, missiles and global military news updates in internet's most professional defence forum.</description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2026 09:41:55 +0000</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2026 09:41:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>Defence Forum &amp; Military Photos - DefenceTalk</generator>
    <link>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/</link>
    <atom:link href="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/-/index.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>The Russian-Ukrainian War Thread</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2026 09:35:18 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/the-russian-ukrainian-war-thread.15283/</link>
      <guid>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/the-russian-ukrainian-war-thread.15283/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (Feanor)</author>
      <category domain="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/geostrategic-issues.47/"><![CDATA[Geostrategic Issues]]></category>
      <dc:creator>Feanor</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="bbWrapper">I tried looking for the last one of these we had but it seems to be buried pretty deep, so I'll start a new one. This is a catchall thread for the ongoing military and geo-strategic stalemate in eastern Ukraine.<br />
<br />
As of late there have been increasing indicators that something might be brewing. Mostly pro-Russian sources have been pointing out increasing movements of Ukrainian troops, including armor, towards the front line. Now there are indications of rearmament of frontline units with...<br />
<br />
<a href="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/the-russian-ukrainian-war-thread.15283/" class="link link--internal">The Russian-Ukrainian War Thread</a></div>]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>15150</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>General Naval News</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2026 08:13:01 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/general-naval-news.13220/</link>
      <guid>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/general-naval-news.13220/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (gf0012-aust)</author>
      <category domain="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/navy-maritime.22/"><![CDATA[Navy & Maritime]]></category>
      <dc:creator>gf0012-aust</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="bbWrapper"><a href="http://online.wsj.com/articles/saab-buys-submarine-builder-thyssenkrupp-marine-1404075873" target="_blank" class="link link--external" rel="noopener">Saab Buys Submarine Builder ThyssenKrupp Marine Systems AB - WSJ</a><br />
<br />
still subject to review by Swedish Govt and TK</div>]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>624</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Indonesia:  'green water navy'</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2026 07:43:52 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/indonesia-green-water-navy.3897/</link>
      <guid>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/indonesia-green-water-navy.3897/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (Supe)</author>
      <category domain="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/navy-maritime.22/"><![CDATA[Navy & Maritime]]></category>
      <dc:creator>Supe</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="bbWrapper">After reading this (quite interesting) <a href="http://www.strategypage.com/messageboards/messages/512-12402.asp" target="_blank" class="link link--external" rel="nofollow noopener"> thread</a> on Indonesian aspirations for a 'green water navy' , it left me wondering about the capabilities of the Indonesian Navy as it stands now and the direction it wants to take. <a href="http://www.hazegray.org/worldnav/asiapac/indones.htm" target="_blank" class="link link--external" rel="nofollow noopener">World Navies today</a> website  lists quite a few assets, particularly of amphibious ships. It looks like they have a decent amphibious...<br />
<br />
<a href="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/indonesia-green-water-navy.3897/" class="link link--internal">Indonesia:  'green water navy'</a></div>]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>3670</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Indonesian Aero News</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2026 06:37:47 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/indonesian-aero-news.9220/</link>
      <guid>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/indonesian-aero-news.9220/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (Ananda)</author>
      <category domain="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/air-force-aviation.20/"><![CDATA[Air Force & Aviation]]></category>
      <dc:creator>Ananda</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="bbWrapper"><a href="http://newspaper.pikiran-rakyat.com/prprint.php?mib=beritadetail&amp;id=81605" target="_blank" class="link link--external" rel="nofollow noopener">PIKIRAN RAKYAT - PT DI Akan Produksi Pesawat Amfibi</a><br />
<br />
I'm sorry the link is in local newspaper, but in short it's said that the Indonesian Aerospaces (PT. DI) will build (under license) with Dornier a light amphibious plane.<br />
<br />
The DI spokesman says the plane will have capacities for 14 passanger (outside the pilot) and have two engines.<br />
Try to find the info in dornier site, still has not find the relevant...<br />
<br />
<a href="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/indonesian-aero-news.9220/" class="link link--internal">Indonesian Aero News</a></div>]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>3798</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Japanese Maritime Self Defense Force Thread</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2026 23:54:15 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/japanese-maritime-self-defense-force-thread.11488/</link>
      <guid>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/japanese-maritime-self-defense-force-thread.11488/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (gf0012-aust)</author>
      <category domain="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/navy-maritime.22/"><![CDATA[Navy & Maritime]]></category>
      <dc:creator>gf0012-aust</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="bbWrapper">New Helicopter Carrier for Japanese Navy<br />
By Keith Henderson at October 11, 2011 07:35 <br />
Filed Under: Research &amp; Development <br />
<br />
Details of the propulsion system for the new Helicopter Carrier of the Japanese Navy / Maritime Self-Defence Force (JMSDF) have been announced. To be built by IHI of Tokyo, the LOA 814 ft (248 m) and beam of 124 ft (38 m) vessel will have a fully loaded displacement of around 27,500 tons. The official Japanese 22DDH designation of the ship is of a “destroyer” but...<br />
<br />
<a href="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/japanese-maritime-self-defense-force-thread.11488/" class="link link--internal">Japanese Maritime Self Defense Force Thread</a></div>]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>674</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Saab J-32 Lansen – Full Engine Start-Up Sequence</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2026 09:32:41 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/saab-j-32-lansen-full-engine-start-up-sequence.16060/</link>
      <guid>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/saab-j-32-lansen-full-engine-start-up-sequence.16060/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (Dino van Doorn)</author>
      <category domain="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/photos-videos.24/"><![CDATA[Photos & Videos]]></category>
      <dc:creator>Dino van Doorn</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="bbWrapper">Saab J-32 Lansen startup before starting his flying display at Malmen, Linkoping<br />
<br />
<b><span style="color: #FF0000">Click on the picture below to enter the content</span></b> <br />
.<br />
<a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gaHX542DsQY" target="_blank" class="link link--external" rel="nofollow noopener"><img src="https://gmap.nl/wp-content/uploads/GMAP7771-YT-1200px.webp" data-url="https://gmap.nl/wp-content/uploads/GMAP7771-YT-1200px.webp" class="bbImage " style=""   /></a></div>]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>US Army News and updates general discussion</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2026 07:01:35 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/us-army-news-and-updates-general-discussion.13588/</link>
      <guid>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/us-army-news-and-updates-general-discussion.13588/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (Ranger25)</author>
      <category domain="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/army-security-forces.21/"><![CDATA[Army & Security Forces]]></category>
      <dc:creator>Ranger25</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="bbWrapper">LTG MacMaster recently gave a hint of the overall procurement direction he wants to move the U.S. army in.  He will,give a full description at the upcoming AUSA meeting. <br />
<br />
In brief, he wants to add greater lethality after the previous ten years focus in ME wars were more geared to vehicle protection.  Most interesting was his desire to procure &quot;off the shelf&quot; technology to readily equip new Brigade teams.  <br />
<br />
He also stated he wants upgrade he current Styker units to more heavily armed...<br />
<br />
<a href="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/us-army-news-and-updates-general-discussion.13588/" class="link link--internal">US Army News and updates general discussion</a></div>]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>623</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Royal Navy Discussions and Updates</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2026 01:11:14 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/the-royal-navy-discussions-and-updates.5679/</link>
      <guid>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/the-royal-navy-discussions-and-updates.5679/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (overlander)</author>
      <category domain="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/navy-maritime.22/"><![CDATA[Navy & Maritime]]></category>
      <dc:creator>overlander</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="bbWrapper">RN Year in Review - 2006<br />
...  the lowest priority<br />
<br />
24 December 2006<br />
<br />
Every year since 2000 I have  written an end of year wrap up ... and everyone is more depressing to write and read than the last.  Sadly 2006 is ending on a new low, with precious little good news and rumours of a yet another round of deep cuts getting ever stronger. <br />
<br />
In 2005 we had the Trafalgar bicentenary which at least forced many senior officials of the realm to pay some lip service to the Royal Navy, but 2006 didn't...<br />
<br />
<a href="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/the-royal-navy-discussions-and-updates.5679/" class="link link--internal">The Royal Navy Discussions and Updates</a></div>]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>14175</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>European Union, member states and Agencies</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2026 08:22:30 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/european-union-member-states-and-agencies.15723/</link>
      <guid>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/european-union-member-states-and-agencies.15723/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (SolarisKenzo)</author>
      <category domain="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/geostrategic-issues.47/"><![CDATA[Geostrategic Issues]]></category>
      <dc:creator>SolarisKenzo</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="bbWrapper">As a result of the tragic 2015 European migrant crisis, the European Union decided to create its first Standing Corp: The European Border and Coast Guard Agency, also known as Frontex ( wich was the name of the previous agency that was replaced ).<br />
<br />

	

	<div class="bbCodeBlock bbCodeBlock--unfurl    js-unfurl fauxBlockLink"
		data-unfurl="true" data-result-id="33159" data-url="https://frontex.europa.eu/" data-host="frontex.europa.eu" data-pending="false">
		<div class="contentRow">
			
			<div class="contentRow-main">
				<h3 class="contentRow-header js-unfurl-title">
					<a href="https://frontex.europa.eu/"
						class="link link--external fauxBlockLink-blockLink"
						target="_blank"
						rel="nofollow noopener"
						data-proxy-href="">
						Frontex | European Union Agency
					</a>
				</h3>

				<div class="contentRow-snippet js-unfurl-desc">Frontex promotes, coordinates and develops European border management in line with the EU fundamental rights charter applying the concept of Integrated Border Management.</div>

				<div class="contentRow-minor contentRow-minor--hideLinks">
					<span class="js-unfurl-favicon">
						
					</span>
					frontex.europa.eu
				</div>
			</div>
		</div>
	</div>
<br />
Frontex is de iure and de facto a Federal Agency, with its own standing corp and officers.<br />
<br />
Its HQ is in Warsaw.<br />
<br />
While being almost unknown outside of the EU, Frontex is the fastest growing...<br />
<br />
<a href="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/european-union-member-states-and-agencies.15723/" class="link link--internal">European Union, member states and Agencies</a></div>]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>357</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Turkish navy</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2026 23:23:08 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/turkish-navy.14792/</link>
      <guid>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/turkish-navy.14792/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (Stampede)</author>
      <category domain="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/navy-maritime.22/"><![CDATA[Navy & Maritime]]></category>
      <dc:creator>Stampede</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="bbWrapper">Spotted this little article I thought some may find of interest about the TCG Anadolu LHD.<br />
<br />
<a href="https://www.defenceturkey.com/en/content/tcg-anadolu-lhd-a-naval-platform-that-will-multiply-the-power-projection-capability-of-turkish-navy-3335" target="_blank" class="link link--external" rel="nofollow noopener">TCG Anadolu LHD: A Naval Platform that will Multiply the Power Projection Capability of Turkish Navy! - Defence Turkey Magazine</a><br />
<br />
Some of the article discusses the naughty stuff we cannot talk about; but what did get my interest was the fact...<br />
<br />
<a href="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/turkish-navy.14792/" class="link link--internal">Turkish navy</a></div>]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>66</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Royal Australian Navy Discussions and Updates 2.0</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2026 05:54:58 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/royal-australian-navy-discussions-and-updates-2-0.15429/</link>
      <guid>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/royal-australian-navy-discussions-and-updates-2-0.15429/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (OPSSG)</author>
      <category domain="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/navy-maritime.22/"><![CDATA[Navy & Maritime]]></category>
      <dc:creator>OPSSG</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="bbWrapper"><b><span style="color: rgb(65, 168, 95)">1.  This Royal Australian Navy Discussions and Updates 2.0 thread is a continuation of the</span> </b><a href="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/royal-australian-navy-discussions-and-updates.5905/" class="link link--internal"><b>older thread</b></a><b> <span style="color: rgb(65, 168, 95)">(starting 20 Nov 2021).  <b>The older RAN thread at 1,500+ pages is a bit too long and further discussions should continue here. Some prior posts before this was moved here from the RAN thread to seed future...</b></span></b><br />
<br />
<a href="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/royal-australian-navy-discussions-and-updates-2-0.15429/" class="link link--internal">Royal Australian Navy Discussions and Updates 2.0</a></div>]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>15425</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Royal Australian Air Force [RAAF] News, Discussions and Updates</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2026 12:09:19 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/royal-australian-air-force-raaf-news-discussions-and-updates.6007/</link>
      <guid>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/royal-australian-air-force-raaf-news-discussions-and-updates.6007/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (Todjaeger)</author>
      <category domain="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/air-force-aviation.20/"><![CDATA[Air Force & Aviation]]></category>
      <dc:creator>Todjaeger</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="bbWrapper">Thought I'd start a general RAAF thread, since many of the existing ones end up shifting back and forth despite the initial start of the topic.  That and I have a question that doesn't quite seem to pertain to any active thread at present.<br />
<br />
Currently the Project Wedgetail (AIR 5077) for the E-737 is ongoing but behind 18+ months.  Delivery from what I've last read is now expected in early 2010, although some are already in Australia.  As part of the program, 4 were ordered, with options...<br />
<br />
<a href="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/royal-australian-air-force-raaf-news-discussions-and-updates.6007/" class="link link--internal">Royal Australian Air Force [RAAF] News, Discussions and Updates</a></div>]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>10605</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>United States Defense Thread</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2026 06:51:28 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/united-states-defense-thread.14212/</link>
      <guid>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/united-states-defense-thread.14212/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (ngatimozart)</author>
      <category domain="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/geostrategic-issues.47/"><![CDATA[Geostrategic Issues]]></category>
      <dc:creator>ngatimozart</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="bbWrapper">A catchall thread for general US defence related topics that involve more than one US Service; USN, USMC, US Army and USCG.</div>]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>372</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Canada  Defence Force</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2026 05:21:21 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/canada-defence-force.13916/</link>
      <guid>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/canada-defence-force.13916/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (Novascotiaboy)</author>
      <category domain="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/geostrategic-issues.47/"><![CDATA[Geostrategic Issues]]></category>
      <dc:creator>Novascotiaboy</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="bbWrapper">With last nights election one of the comments during the run up involved the president elects statement that Allies need to take more of a stake in protecting themselves.  <br />
<br />
For Canada, that means a significant increase to defence expenditure as we hover around 1% of GDP, half the NATO target.<br />
<br />
Even a half a percent increase would have a significant impact on the procurement of equipment.  <br />
<br />
What do readers think will happen?<br />
<br />
Nothing, something?<br />
<br />
Will the new president elect enact...<br />
<br />
<a href="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/canada-defence-force.13916/" class="link link--internal">Canada  Defence Force</a></div>]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>378</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>US Navy News and updates</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2026 05:12:41 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/us-navy-news-and-updates.7961/</link>
      <guid>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/us-navy-news-and-updates.7961/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (AegisFC)</author>
      <category domain="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/navy-maritime.22/"><![CDATA[Navy & Maritime]]></category>
      <dc:creator>AegisFC</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="bbWrapper">Navy Secretary Donald Winter announced Friday that the new amphibious assault ship known as LHA 6 would be named America, granting the wish of veterans of the aircraft carrier America, who have lobbied for another ship to take the name after theirs was sunk as a target in 2005.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.navytimes.com/news/2008/06/navy_america_name_063008w/" target="_blank" class="link link--external" rel="noopener">http://www.navytimes.com/news/2008/06/navy_america_name_063008w/</a><br />
<br />




<blockquote class="bbCodeBlock bbCodeBlock--expandable bbCodeBlock--quote">
	
	<div class="bbCodeBlock-content">
		
		<div class="bbCodeBlock-expandContent ">
			New amphib to be named America<br />
<br />
By Philip Ewing - Staff writer<br />
Posted : Wednesday Jul 2, 2008 13:13:02 EDT<br />
<br />
Navy Secretary Donald...
		</div>
		<div class="bbCodeBlock-expandLink"><a>Click to expand...</a></div>
	</div>
</blockquote><a href="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/us-navy-news-and-updates.7961/" class="link link--internal">US Navy News and updates</a></div>]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>4050</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Military Aviation News and Discussion</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2026 05:01:07 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/military-aviation-news-and-discussion.13643/</link>
      <guid>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/military-aviation-news-and-discussion.13643/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (ngatimozart)</author>
      <category domain="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/air-force-aviation.20/"><![CDATA[Air Force & Aviation]]></category>
      <dc:creator>ngatimozart</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="bbWrapper">I've started this thread so that military aviation news can be posted and discussed. this is more about the equipment in general rather than placing it in one another air force's and / or navy's thread. This way it isn't repeated or lost. This is <b>not an aircraft vs another aircraft argument thread</b> - see the <a href="http://www.defencetalk.com/forums/air-force-aviation/why-vs-platform-discussions-unproductive-13165/#post280996" class="link link--internal">guidance</a>.</div>]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>1260</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>AI / Robotics and the Rise of the Machines (Humanoid)</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2026 00:00:57 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/ai-robotics-and-the-rise-of-the-machines-humanoid.15965/</link>
      <guid>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/ai-robotics-and-the-rise-of-the-machines-humanoid.15965/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (koxinga)</author>
      <category domain="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/intros-off-topic.60/"><![CDATA[Intros & Off Topic]]></category>
      <dc:creator>koxinga</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="bbWrapper">We don't seem to have a dedicated thread on humanoid robots or to be more precise, embodied intelligence (combination of AI, autonomous sensors with a physical presence). <br />
<br />
Compared to the 90s / 2000s / 2010s, advancements in areas of electronics, battery technology, sensors and AI have enabled functionality that have practical implications and are moving beyond research labs into factories. <br />
<br />
Below from left, Figure 02 (Figure AI), Optimus (Tesla), Atlas (Boston Dynamics)<br />
<br />
[ATTACH...<br />
<br />
<a href="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/ai-robotics-and-the-rise-of-the-machines-humanoid.15965/" class="link link--internal">AI / Robotics and the Rise of the Machines (Humanoid)</a></div>]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Chinese Air Force (PLA-AF) News and Discussion</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2026 23:04:36 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/chinese-air-force-pla-af-news-and-discussion.13873/</link>
      <guid>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/chinese-air-force-pla-af-news-and-discussion.13873/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (ngatimozart)</author>
      <category domain="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/air-force-aviation.20/"><![CDATA[Air Force & Aviation]]></category>
      <dc:creator>ngatimozart</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="bbWrapper">I couldn't find a relevant thread so started this one.<br />
<br />
It appears that the Chinese are increasing their airlift capabilities significantly. It is being reported that they have reached agreement with the Ukraine to <a href="http://www.janes.com/article/63341/china-and-ukraine-agree-to-restart-an-225-production" target="_blank" class="link link--external" rel="noopener">restart production of the Antonov AN-225 Mriya</a> strategic airlifter. The AN-225 is the largest aircraft in the world at the moment and only one is flying; it being flown by...<br />
<br />
<a href="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/chinese-air-force-pla-af-news-and-discussion.13873/" class="link link--internal">Chinese Air Force (PLA-AF) News and Discussion</a></div>]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>195</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RSN capabilities</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2026 15:51:53 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/rsn-capabilities.6411/</link>
      <guid>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/rsn-capabilities.6411/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (SGMilitary)</author>
      <category domain="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/navy-maritime.22/"><![CDATA[Navy & Maritime]]></category>
      <dc:creator>SGMilitary</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="bbWrapper">Anyone knows what is the development plan for RSN over the next 5-10 years?<br />
<br />
It was speculated that out Victory covettes will be replaced with a larger <br />
<br />
and more capable stealth frigates in the next several years.<br />
<br />
And as mentioned the next 5-10 years will be a modernisation plans for a 3G <br />
<br />
SAF.<br />
<br />
Anyone has any comments??</div>]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>437</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Indian Military Aviation; News, Updates &amp; Discussions</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2026 15:33:09 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/indian-military-aviation-news-updates-discussions.11156/</link>
      <guid>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/indian-military-aviation-news-updates-discussions.11156/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (Twinblade)</author>
      <category domain="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/air-force-aviation.20/"><![CDATA[Air Force & Aviation]]></category>
      <dc:creator>Twinblade</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="bbWrapper">I wonder what happened to the old thread, anyhow;<br />
<br />
I am starting a new thread to cover military aviation in Indian Air Force, Indian Army and Indian Navy.<br />
<br />
Here's some food for your thought..<br />
<br />
<a href="http://iafnews.nuvodev.com/posts/indian-armed-forces-to-induct-1000-helicopters-by-2020/" target="_blank" class="link link--external" rel="nofollow noopener">Indian Armed forced to induct 1000 helos by 2020</a><br />
<br />




<blockquote class="bbCodeBlock bbCodeBlock--expandable bbCodeBlock--quote">
	
	<div class="bbCodeBlock-content">
		
		<div class="bbCodeBlock-expandContent ">
			The choppers to be inducted into the Army, Navy and Air Force include around 450 light utility, 12 VVIP, over 200 attack, 139 Mi-17...
		</div>
		<div class="bbCodeBlock-expandLink"><a>Click to expand...</a></div>
	</div>
</blockquote><a href="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/indian-military-aviation-news-updates-discussions.11156/" class="link link--internal">Indian Military Aviation; News, Updates &amp; Discussions</a></div>]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>625</slash:comments>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>