<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="no"?><rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Defense Forum at DefenceTalk.com</title>
    <description>Global Defense forum, discuss topics on air force, army, navy, missiles and global military news updates in internet's most professional defence forum.</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2026 06:53:39 +0000</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2026 06:53:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>Defence Forum &amp; Military Photos - DefenceTalk</generator>
    <link>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/</link>
    <atom:link href="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/-/index.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Royal Australian Navy Discussions and Updates 2.0</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2026 06:52:19 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/royal-australian-navy-discussions-and-updates-2-0.15429/</link>
      <guid>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/royal-australian-navy-discussions-and-updates-2-0.15429/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (OPSSG)</author>
      <category domain="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/navy-maritime.22/"><![CDATA[Navy & Maritime]]></category>
      <dc:creator>OPSSG</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="bbWrapper"><b><span style="color: rgb(65, 168, 95)">1.  This Royal Australian Navy Discussions and Updates 2.0 thread is a continuation of the</span> </b><a href="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/royal-australian-navy-discussions-and-updates.5905/" class="link link--internal"><b>older thread</b></a><b> <span style="color: rgb(65, 168, 95)">(starting 20 Nov 2021).  <b>The older RAN thread at 1,500+ pages is a bit too long and further discussions should continue here. Some prior posts before this was moved here from the RAN thread to seed future...</b></span></b><br />
<br />
<a href="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/royal-australian-navy-discussions-and-updates-2-0.15429/" class="link link--internal">Royal Australian Navy Discussions and Updates 2.0</a></div>]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>14604</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ADF General discussion thread</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2026 06:14:29 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/adf-general-discussion-thread.11750/</link>
      <guid>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/adf-general-discussion-thread.11750/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (Todjaeger)</author>
      <category domain="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/geostrategic-issues.47/"><![CDATA[Geostrategic Issues]]></category>
      <dc:creator>Todjaeger</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="bbWrapper">With the recent release of the interim <a href="http://www.defence.gov.au/oscdf/adf-posture-review/docs/interim/default.htm" target="_blank" class="link link--external" rel="nofollow noopener">ADF Posture Review</a>, it was IMO rightly suggested that a general ADF discussion thread should be created.  Having looked at some of the recommendations and how some appear to be tri-service in nature, it seemed like a non-service specific thread would be good.<br />
<br />
Having done a quick read through, a few things do jump out at me.<br />
<br />
One of the first was the suggestion...<br />
<br />
<a href="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/adf-general-discussion-thread.11750/" class="link link--internal">ADF General discussion thread</a></div>]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>3878</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Middle East Defence &amp; Security</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2026 05:40:11 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/middle-east-defence-security.13210/</link>
      <guid>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/middle-east-defence-security.13210/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (MaenZ)</author>
      <category domain="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/geostrategic-issues.47/"><![CDATA[Geostrategic Issues]]></category>
      <dc:creator>MaenZ</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="bbWrapper">It's funny to call this a crisis because we have always been at war.<br />
<br />
Anyway, Does you have any strategic insight to share about the growing ISIL threat in the region?<br />
<br />
I'm particularly interested with Jordanian defense capability against the group. As voices inside Jordan claim that ISIL cannot possibly break into Jordanian defenses. However outside neutral sources claim that Jordan cannot handle ISIL on it's own.<br />
<br />
Jordan is claimed to be the best trained Arab fighting force on the...<br />
<br />
<a href="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/middle-east-defence-security.13210/" class="link link--internal">Middle East Defence &amp; Security</a></div>]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>1861</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Philippine Navy Discussion and Updates</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2026 05:34:58 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/philippine-navy-discussion-and-updates.11183/</link>
      <guid>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/philippine-navy-discussion-and-updates.11183/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (gforce)</author>
      <category domain="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/navy-maritime.22/"><![CDATA[Navy & Maritime]]></category>
      <dc:creator>gforce</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="bbWrapper"><b>Philippine Navy Modernization</b><br />
<br />
<b>DND rushing acquisition of Navy vessels</b><br />
<span style="font-size: 9px">(The Philippine Star) Updated May 16, 2010 12:00 AM</span><br />
<br />
MANILA, Philippines - Outgoing Defense Secretary Norberto Gonzales is rushing the acquisition of one or two multi-role vessels through a government-to-government contract at a cost of from P5 billion to P10 billion... either from Singapore or South Korea...<br />
<br />
<a href="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/philippine-navy-discussion-and-updates.11183/" class="link link--internal">Philippine Navy Discussion and Updates</a></div>]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>785</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Royal Australian Air Force [RAAF] News, Discussions and Updates</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2026 04:36:32 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/royal-australian-air-force-raaf-news-discussions-and-updates.6007/</link>
      <guid>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/royal-australian-air-force-raaf-news-discussions-and-updates.6007/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (Todjaeger)</author>
      <category domain="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/air-force-aviation.20/"><![CDATA[Air Force & Aviation]]></category>
      <dc:creator>Todjaeger</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="bbWrapper">Thought I'd start a general RAAF thread, since many of the existing ones end up shifting back and forth despite the initial start of the topic.  That and I have a question that doesn't quite seem to pertain to any active thread at present.<br />
<br />
Currently the Project Wedgetail (AIR 5077) for the E-737 is ongoing but behind 18+ months.  Delivery from what I've last read is now expected in early 2010, although some are already in Australia.  As part of the program, 4 were ordered, with options...<br />
<br />
<a href="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/royal-australian-air-force-raaf-news-discussions-and-updates.6007/" class="link link--internal">Royal Australian Air Force [RAAF] News, Discussions and Updates</a></div>]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>10346</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>New Zealand Army</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2026 01:28:26 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/new-zealand-army.4547/</link>
      <guid>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/new-zealand-army.4547/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (Whiskyjack)</author>
      <category domain="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/army-security-forces.21/"><![CDATA[Army & Security Forces]]></category>
      <dc:creator>Whiskyjack</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="bbWrapper"><span style="color: black">Hi Guys, before Christmas I saw a media report that suggested that the NZ army had conducted a review of how it was going to organise its battalions.  This review was a result of manpower shortages and new equipment. This review was finished the same time as the Defence Sustainability Initiative released in May 2005, but has not been released.</span><br />
 <br />
<span style="color: black">I have seen nothing since, but I know the Australian army is looking at changing its...</span><br />
<br />
<a href="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/new-zealand-army.4547/" class="link link--internal">New Zealand Army</a></div>]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>2337</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>General Naval News</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2026 10:19:13 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/general-naval-news.13220/</link>
      <guid>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/general-naval-news.13220/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (gf0012-aust)</author>
      <category domain="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/navy-maritime.22/"><![CDATA[Navy & Maritime]]></category>
      <dc:creator>gf0012-aust</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="bbWrapper"><a href="http://online.wsj.com/articles/saab-buys-submarine-builder-thyssenkrupp-marine-1404075873" target="_blank" class="link link--external" rel="noopener">Saab Buys Submarine Builder ThyssenKrupp Marine Systems AB - WSJ</a><br />
<br />
still subject to review by Swedish Govt and TK</div>]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>613</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Russian-Ukrainian War Thread</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2026 04:57:49 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/the-russian-ukrainian-war-thread.15283/</link>
      <guid>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/the-russian-ukrainian-war-thread.15283/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (Feanor)</author>
      <category domain="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/geostrategic-issues.47/"><![CDATA[Geostrategic Issues]]></category>
      <dc:creator>Feanor</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="bbWrapper">I tried looking for the last one of these we had but it seems to be buried pretty deep, so I'll start a new one. This is a catchall thread for the ongoing military and geo-strategic stalemate in eastern Ukraine.<br />
<br />
As of late there have been increasing indicators that something might be brewing. Mostly pro-Russian sources have been pointing out increasing movements of Ukrainian troops, including armor, towards the front line. Now there are indications of rearmament of frontline units with...<br />
<br />
<a href="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/the-russian-ukrainian-war-thread.15283/" class="link link--internal">The Russian-Ukrainian War Thread</a></div>]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>14256</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Indonesia:  'green water navy'</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2026 02:34:10 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/indonesia-green-water-navy.3897/</link>
      <guid>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/indonesia-green-water-navy.3897/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (Supe)</author>
      <category domain="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/navy-maritime.22/"><![CDATA[Navy & Maritime]]></category>
      <dc:creator>Supe</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="bbWrapper">After reading this (quite interesting) <a href="http://www.strategypage.com/messageboards/messages/512-12402.asp" target="_blank" class="link link--external" rel="nofollow noopener"> thread</a> on Indonesian aspirations for a 'green water navy' , it left me wondering about the capabilities of the Indonesian Navy as it stands now and the direction it wants to take. <a href="http://www.hazegray.org/worldnav/asiapac/indones.htm" target="_blank" class="link link--external" rel="nofollow noopener">World Navies today</a> website  lists quite a few assets, particularly of amphibious ships. It looks like they have a decent amphibious...<br />
<br />
<a href="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/indonesia-green-water-navy.3897/" class="link link--internal">Indonesia:  'green water navy'</a></div>]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>3495</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Australian Army Discussions and Updates</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2026 01:44:16 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/australian-army-discussions-and-updates.5526/</link>
      <guid>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/australian-army-discussions-and-updates.5526/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (mickk)</author>
      <category domain="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/army-security-forces.21/"><![CDATA[Army & Security Forces]]></category>
      <dc:creator>mickk</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="bbWrapper">James Button, London<br />
November 24, 2006<br />
<br />


	
	
		
		
	


	<div class="lbContainer lbContainer--inline " title=""
		data-xf-init="lightbox"
		data-lb-single-image="1"
		data-lb-container-zoom="1"
		data-lb-trigger=".js-lbImage-_xfUid-1-1775458419"
		data-lb-id="_xfUid-1-1775458419">
		
			<div class="lbContainer-zoomer js-lbImage-_xfUid-1-1775458419" data-src="http://i10.tinypic.com/2heeouc.jpg" aria-label="Zoom"></div>
		
		<img src="http://i10.tinypic.com/2heeouc.jpg" data-url="http://i10.tinypic.com/2heeouc.jpg" class="bbImage" data-zoom-target="1"  style="" />
	</div>

<br />
<br />
HE REMEMBERS every detail: a massive explosion in the helicopter, a smell of cordite, bullets ricocheting off the walls, his door gunner trying to get a shot at their attackers, and his co-pilot noticing blood pooling in his lap and realising he had been shot through the chest.<br />
<br />
&quot;He was amazing,&quot; Scott Watkins says of his co-pilot that day in Iraq, Keith Reesby, whose heart escaped a bullet by two...<br />
<br />
<a href="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/australian-army-discussions-and-updates.5526/" class="link link--internal">Australian Army Discussions and Updates</a></div>]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>12167</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Royal Canadian Navy Discussions and updates</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2026 17:15:08 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/royal-canadian-navy-discussions-and-updates.4210/</link>
      <guid>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/royal-canadian-navy-discussions-and-updates.4210/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (stephen weist)</author>
      <category domain="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/navy-maritime.22/"><![CDATA[Navy & Maritime]]></category>
      <dc:creator>stephen weist</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="bbWrapper">The tribals will have to be replaced in the near future, anyone have any thoughts on possible replacements.  I think the replacements should be slightly larger to accomodate the CnC task and also for future upgrades.  I think the anti air/missile capability should be enhanced as the city class frigates could handle the ASW component of any taskforce.  Would six be enough, this would leave on avail on each coast at all times.</div>]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>4047</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Russian Navy Discussions and Updates</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2026 14:21:34 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/russian-navy-discussions-and-updates.8178/</link>
      <guid>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/russian-navy-discussions-and-updates.8178/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (Spacearrow99)</author>
      <category domain="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/navy-maritime.22/"><![CDATA[Navy & Maritime]]></category>
      <dc:creator>Spacearrow99</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="bbWrapper">The main Russian surface fleet project for the next decade will be Project 22350 Admiral Gorshkov.<br />
<br />
Specifications<br />
4500t<br />
4000nm range @ 16kt<br />
29kt top speed<br />
30 day endurance<br />
crew of 210<br />
<br />
Armament<br />
2*8 Yakhont<br />
4*8 9M96 missiles (The is 9M96 one of the missiles the S-400 system uses.)<br />
2*4 Medvedka 2 VLS ASW<br />
2 Sosna CIAD<br />
130mm A-192<br />
<br />
Command and Control<br />
Redut AA Suite<br />
<br />
Sensors<br />
Poliment K-Radar<br />
Puma Fire Control Radar<br />
<br />
The VLS Shtil-1 will be offered to export customers...<br />
<br />
<a href="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/russian-navy-discussions-and-updates.8178/" class="link link--internal">Russian Navy Discussions and Updates</a></div>]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>1837</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>General Space News.</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2026 10:28:17 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/general-space-news.15817/</link>
      <guid>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/general-space-news.15817/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (ngatimozart)</author>
      <category domain="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/space-technology.32/"><![CDATA[Space Technology]]></category>
      <dc:creator>ngatimozart</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="bbWrapper">Update about latest space news. <br />
<ul>
<li data-xf-list-type="ul">Elon Musk reckons that the next Starship will fly in 6 - 8 weeks. We'll see. </li>
<li data-xf-list-type="ul">Rocketlab are delaying their Venus mission for one year.</li>
<li data-xf-list-type="ul">NASA is to become a an advisor for commercial space companies.</li>
</ul><div class="bbMediaWrapper">
	<div class="bbMediaWrapper-inner">
		<iframe src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/eycFbUG3Mwg?wmode=opaque&start=0"
				width="560" height="315"
				frameborder="0" allowfullscreen="true"></iframe>
	</div>
</div></div>]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>79</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>2 Lockheed Martin KC-130J Hercules from the US Marine Corps USMC arrival at Munich Airport</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2026 07:50:13 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/2-lockheed-martin-kc-130j-hercules-from-the-us-marine-corps-usmc-arrival-at-munich-airport.16049/</link>
      <guid>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/2-lockheed-martin-kc-130j-hercules-from-the-us-marine-corps-usmc-arrival-at-munich-airport.16049/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (MUC-Spotter)</author>
      <category domain="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/photos-videos.24/"><![CDATA[Photos & Videos]]></category>
      <dc:creator>MUC-Spotter</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="bbWrapper"><div class="bbMediaWrapper">
	<div class="bbMediaWrapper-inner">
		<iframe src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/7fn-DbGAZtE?wmode=opaque&start=0"
				width="560" height="315"
				frameborder="0" allowfullscreen="true"></iframe>
	</div>
</div></div>]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>NZDF General discussion thread</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2026 01:42:45 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/nzdf-general-discussion-thread.6137/</link>
      <guid>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/nzdf-general-discussion-thread.6137/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (NZLAV)</author>
      <category domain="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/geostrategic-issues.47/"><![CDATA[Geostrategic Issues]]></category>
      <dc:creator>NZLAV</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="bbWrapper">If a new government came into power in New Zealand and had the vision of making New Zealand a regional power, what could they to to make this happen?<br />
<br />
New Zealand's army is very well trained as in equipt with modern weapon such as:<br />
<br />
<u>Armoured Vehicles</u><br />
<br />
105 x NZ Light Armoured Vehicle (NZLAV) <br />
352x Pinzgauer Light Operational Vehicle (LOV) <br />
<br />
<u>Missile Systems</u><br />
<br />
12 x Mistral anti-aircraft missile <br />
24 x Javelin Anti-Tank Guided Missile (ATGM) launchers <br />
<br />
<u>Support...</u><br />
<br />
<a href="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/nzdf-general-discussion-thread.6137/" class="link link--internal">NZDF General discussion thread</a></div>]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>9239</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Manned Lunar Missions</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2026 13:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/manned-lunar-missions.15309/</link>
      <guid>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/manned-lunar-missions.15309/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (cdxbow)</author>
      <category domain="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/space-technology.32/"><![CDATA[Space Technology]]></category>
      <dc:creator>cdxbow</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="bbWrapper">I couldn't find an appropriate thread for this, but it seems like it's a good time to start a NASA lunar mission thread, as things are really starting to happen. <br />
<br />
NASA said that it has selected SpaceX and its Starship vehicle to serve as the lunar lander for its Artemis Program.  <a href="https://arstechnica.com/science/2021/04/nasa-selects-spacex-as-its-sole-provider-for-a-lunar-lander/?comments=1" target="_blank" class="link link--external" rel="nofollow noopener">NASA selects SpaceX as its sole provider for a lunar lander | Ars Technica</a> <br />
<br />
This is...<br />
<br />
<a href="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/manned-lunar-missions.15309/" class="link link--internal">Manned Lunar Missions</a></div>]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>23</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Indonesian Aero News</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2026 05:44:55 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/indonesian-aero-news.9220/</link>
      <guid>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/indonesian-aero-news.9220/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (Ananda)</author>
      <category domain="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/air-force-aviation.20/"><![CDATA[Air Force & Aviation]]></category>
      <dc:creator>Ananda</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="bbWrapper"><a href="http://newspaper.pikiran-rakyat.com/prprint.php?mib=beritadetail&amp;id=81605" target="_blank" class="link link--external" rel="nofollow noopener">PIKIRAN RAKYAT - PT DI Akan Produksi Pesawat Amfibi</a><br />
<br />
I'm sorry the link is in local newspaper, but in short it's said that the Indonesian Aerospaces (PT. DI) will build (under license) with Dornier a light amphibious plane.<br />
<br />
The DI spokesman says the plane will have capacities for 14 passanger (outside the pilot) and have two engines.<br />
Try to find the info in dornier site, still has not find the relevant...<br />
<br />
<a href="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/indonesian-aero-news.9220/" class="link link--internal">Indonesian Aero News</a></div>]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>3620</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>General Information on missile/artillery developments</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2026 15:16:13 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/general-information-on-missile-artillery-developments.15601/</link>
      <guid>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/general-information-on-missile-artillery-developments.15601/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (John Fedup)</author>
      <category domain="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/missiles-wmds.23/"><![CDATA[Missiles & WMDs]]></category>
      <dc:creator>John Fedup</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="bbWrapper">This article describes the PrSM which can be used with HIMARS and MLRS.  Longer range and the ability to hit moving targets are some of the highlights.<br />
<br />

	

	<div class="bbCodeBlock bbCodeBlock--unfurl    js-unfurl fauxBlockLink"
		data-unfurl="true" data-result-id="25371" data-url="https://www.navalnews.com/naval-news/2022/08/precision-strike-missile-prsm-information-update/" data-host="www.navalnews.com" data-pending="false">
		<div class="contentRow">
			
				<div class="contentRow-figure contentRow-figure--fixedSmall js-unfurl-figure">
					
						<img src="https://www.navalnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/PrSM-2.jpg" alt="www.navalnews.com" data-onerror="hide-parent"/>
					
				</div>
			
			<div class="contentRow-main">
				<h3 class="contentRow-header js-unfurl-title">
					<a href="https://www.navalnews.com/naval-news/2022/08/precision-strike-missile-prsm-information-update/"
						class="link link--external fauxBlockLink-blockLink"
						target="_blank"
						rel="nofollow noopener"
						data-proxy-href="">
						Precision Strike Missile (PrSM) Information Update - Naval News
					</a>
				</h3>

				<div class="contentRow-snippet js-unfurl-desc">One of the greatest advantages of the U.S. Army&#039;s Precision Strike Missile PrSM is that it can hit moving land and maritime targets using a multi-mode seeker.</div>

				<div class="contentRow-minor contentRow-minor--hideLinks">
					<span class="js-unfurl-favicon">
						
							<img src="https://www.navalnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/cropped-favicon-1-32x32.png" alt="www.navalnews.com" class="bbCodeBlockUnfurl-icon"
								data-onerror="hide-parent"/>
						
					</span>
					www.navalnews.com
				</div>
			</div>
		</div>
	</div></div>]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Future Energy Pathways</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2026 00:31:44 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/future-energy-pathways.14649/</link>
      <guid>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/future-energy-pathways.14649/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (MrConservative)</author>
      <category domain="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/intros-off-topic.60/"><![CDATA[Intros & Off Topic]]></category>
      <dc:creator>MrConservative</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="bbWrapper">This thread is to discuss future energy solutions and policies including the relationship between energy and national security.</div>]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>255</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Luftwaffe/German Air Force News, Discussions &amp; Updates</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2026 22:08:01 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/luftwaffe-german-air-force-news-discussions-updates.15015/</link>
      <guid>https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/luftwaffe-german-air-force-news-discussions-updates.15015/</guid>
      <author>invalid@example.com (A4kscooter)</author>
      <category domain="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/air-force-aviation.20/"><![CDATA[Air Force & Aviation]]></category>
      <dc:creator>A4kscooter</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="bbWrapper"><div class="bbCodeBlock bbCodeBlock--unfurl    js-unfurl fauxBlockLink"
		data-unfurl="true" data-result-id="556" data-url="https://www.aerotime.aero/clement.charpentreau/24031-boeing-f-a-18-super-hornet-to-replace-the-german-tornado" data-host="www.aerotime.aero" data-pending="false">
		<div class="contentRow">
			
				<div class="contentRow-figure contentRow-figure--fixedSmall js-unfurl-figure">
					
						<img src="https://www.aerotime.aero/upload/files/germany-tornado-eurofighter-typhoon.png" alt="www.aerotime.aero" data-onerror="hide-parent"/>
					
				</div>
			
			<div class="contentRow-main">
				<h3 class="contentRow-header js-unfurl-title">
					<a href="https://www.aerotime.aero/clement.charpentreau/24031-boeing-f-a-18-super-hornet-to-replace-the-german-tornado"
						class="link link--external fauxBlockLink-blockLink"
						target="_blank"
						rel="nofollow noopener"
						data-proxy-href="">
						Boeing F/A-18 Super Hornet to replace the German Tornado?
					</a>
				</h3>

				<div class="contentRow-snippet js-unfurl-desc">Since 2017, the German government has been actively looking to replace its aging fleet of Panavia Tornado aircraft. The strike aircraft that entered service in the 1970s is now even too old to participate in NATO missions. After eliminating the Lockheed F-35 and the Boeing F-15 SE, the German...</div>

				<div class="contentRow-minor contentRow-minor--hideLinks">
					<span class="js-unfurl-favicon">
						
							<img src="https://www.aerotime.aero/img/favicon/favicon.ico" alt="www.aerotime.aero" class="bbCodeBlockUnfurl-icon"
								data-onerror="hide-parent"/>
						
					</span>
					www.aerotime.aero
				</div>
			</div>
		</div>
	</div>
<br />
I really read somewhere the F35 was rejected because it only has 1 x engine and after their experience operating F104 Germany would never operate a fight with 1 x engine again.<br />
<br />
While the British, Dutch, Danes, Italians, Poles, Norwegian etc  are operating or have ordered the F35 don't see this as an issue especially as the F104 first flew in 1958 and...<br />
<br />
<a href="https://www.defencetalk.com/military/forums/t/luftwaffe-german-air-force-news-discussions-updates.15015/" class="link link--internal">Luftwaffe/German Air Force News, Discussions &amp; Updates</a></div>]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>132</slash:comments>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>