DarrenBowling.com

Legal Music Download Sources

2010-03-09T23:00:00.000-05:00

When it comes to purchasing legal pop music,

Here's where I'm at with this.

iTunes is the most user friendly, but typically the most expensive.

And they use AAC (M4A) Files.

Finally these files are DRM free and play in most devices (but not all)

They do play in Traktor (DJ software) which is the most important,

but not playing in like most car stereos for example.

So they need to be converted for car stereos (which typically only play MP3 or WMA).

But they are the best sound quality.

And the selection is Awesome.

The preview is decent, but only 30 seconds.

Average price $1.30 to $1.00

Amazon also sells MP3 downloads.

The file type is 256kbps variable bit rate (vbr) MP3.

These basically play everywhere (its an MP3).

The interface isn't as good as iTunes but not too bad.

The selection is pretty good.

The preview is terrible. Its 30seconds and highly compressed sounding.

You have no idea what the actual file sounds like until you buy it.

Average price $1.00

LaLa is becoming my favorite.

The cost is typically a bit less than iTunes and even less than Amazon.

Average price about $0.89

The preview is awesome. You get to hear the actual file from start to end (but only once).

The selection is a little crappy, but generally gets the job done.

The file type is 256kbps vbr MP3 (I prefer the sound of the AAC files, but the difference is much less than 1%).

The biggest problem is the user interface.

The searching is terrible. You can search for artist or song name, but it doesn't do both.

And you can't organize songs by alphabet. they are seemingly randomly arranged, so you

have to look through all of them to find what you want. Its unbelievable,

That in today's digital world, they couldn't do a better job with that.

The best shopping method is to have all three sites open.

I use the iTunes for most of the research and buy on LaLa or Amazon if LaLa doesn't have it.

Another Smokey Bones coupon...

2010-03-09T18:51:00.000-05:00

Here's another great coupon from Smokey Bones.

Detroit Emptiness

2010-01-02T08:11:00.001-05:00

Great smokey Bones Coupon

2009-12-15T06:47:00.002-05:00

Here's a great coupon from Smokey Bones. I use these all the time...crazy thing is, you can print them off over and over again, and use them until they expire.

Deer hunting how-to

2009-12-01T15:54:00.003-05:00

Haha, this is funny:

Texas is #1

2009-11-10T18:19:00.006-05:00

Maybe I'm just having a bad day or whatever, but the thing is, I woke up sorta shocked this morning when I heard CNN quote a statistic I hadn't heard before (that Texas leads all States with 25% of its population uninsured).

Such news probably wouldn't irritate most people, but the thing that irks me is this: Texas has 32 Representatives in the U.S. House, 20 of whom are Republicans. All of the Republicans and one Democrat voted "No" on the House health care reform bill.

Is this seriously true, or do I need my head examined? Apparently, someone does...

The botfly in my head

2009-09-22T23:09:00.007-04:00

This is pretty fascinating. I saw a link to this video in the New York Times this morning. Thank you to naturebreak.org.

Wait...isn't health care reform good for business?

2009-09-17T21:07:00.007-04:00

You know, so far I've kinda kept my distance in this health care debate. I haven't really been approached by anyone with strong opinions about it, nor have I initiated any discussions about it.

Until now.

My irritation about this whole issue didn't really hit home, and register with my emotions until last night, at around 6:30...I was watching CNN, and I saw the same commercial I had seen every night this week at around the same time. It was a commercial sponsored by Conservatives for Patient Rights. It was ridiculous. What makes it ridiculous is that in my mind, an organization that advocates for patient rights should also advocate for the 46,000,000 people in the U.S. that don't have insurance - not the other way around.

Why don't 46,000,000 people in the U.S. have insurance?

Because they can't afford it.

It's absurd. The United States of America has the largest GDP (by far) of any country in the world. When the U.S. is in recession, we're still doing a lot better than most of the world.

But we have, we allow, we CAUSE 46,000,000 people to be uninsured. 46,000,000 is equivalent to the population of Spain. Of the 223 countries in the world, only 27 of them have more than 46,000,000 people.

According to the National Academies of Science, The U.S. is the only "wealthy, industrialized nation that does not ensure that all citizens have coverage."

At some point, doesn't this become a moral issue? Is it morally sound to be a rich country, full of consumers (the largest importer of goods in the world), but unwilling to provide all of our citizens with access to health care?

Where are all the conservative, republican moralists that fight on every other moral issue? Why are these people so adamantly opposed to universal health coverage? It's ok to spend $2 trillion on the war in Iraq, but it's not ok to spend $900 billion on a health care reform plan? The cost to care for wounded and injured Iraq War veterans is expected to be around $600 billion.

Wait a second...I see. Universal health care would require raising taxes...or at least raising someone's taxes. And the repubs don't want to do that because when we raise taxes, people have less money to spend on their consumer goods...their big screen TV's, SUV's, RV's, clothes, jewelry, watches, shoes, jackets, scarves, fancy meals, stereos, iPods, cell phones, toys, second homes, and every other thing that we as Americans are absolutely entitled to have!

It's no good. There's no way we can allow it to happen. We need to make sure all of our citizens are taxed the least amount possible, and if it means leaving 46,000,000 of our own in the cold, then so be it...our hard-earned Escalades will make us feel better...or at least some of us. Besides, those people should go get a job, and get their own insurance - that way, we don't have to worry about this health care crap.

Wait a sec...there are no jobs in the U.S. right now...

In Michigan, unemployment went back up to 15.2% in August - after taking a slight dip down to 15% in July. It was 15.2% in June too.

Companies, especially ones that manufacture goods - products (things that could actually be exported to other countries) - have all left Michigan. They've left the United States. They've left for other countries where it's cheaper to hire people. The reason it's cheaper to hire people is because they've moved to either (1) undeveloped countries, where people are willing to work for pennies, or (2) countries where universal health care is provided for all citizens.

Why does this make a difference? Because benefits make up a big slice of the cost to employ someone in a manufacturing job here in the U.S. When a company hires someone in the U.S., it costs 25%-%35 of an employee's wages to cover the benefits. Most of these benefit costs are attributed to the employee's health insurance.

Why does GM have such a hard time competing with Toyota and Honda? It's not because they build inferior cars, or are poorly managed. It's because, quite simply, GM has been operating a lot longer than Toyota or Honda, and they have a lot more overhead costs associated with buying their retirees' health care. Not to mention the fact that in the U.S., GM also has to cover their current employees' health care. Not so in Korea, Japan, or Germany - the other three countries that build lots of cars - and have universal health care.

Imagine how prosperous our American automotive manufacturers would be if they didn't have the massive legacy costs associated with covering their retired employees?

The problem is, rather than spreading these legacy costs to the taxpayers, our republicans prefer to let outside manufacturers from other countries import these goods at bottom-dollar prices, produced by bottom dollar workers overseas - and let our own American manufacturers go out of business.

Ultimately the price is born by those who made this country what it is - the working class...blue collar people who actually go to work and BUILD something for a change. Unfortunately, our conservative policies are driving all that was good in the U.S. overseas, and our middle class is suffering, and shrinking as a result.

What's up with Facebook?

2009-09-02T20:06:00.004-04:00

I don't mean to sound like a jerk, or rant and rave about nothing, but Facebook is getting annoying.

Today someone tagged me on a note that was attached to a nasty photo of a dog - presumably one of Michael Vick's (who's to say?) - who's face had been so mangled, it looked like spaghetti. Seriously, I don't need or want to see this. Especially not on Facebook. I thought about sending the person a note explaining my disgust, but then decided I didn't want to hurt the person's feelings, and left it alone.

I'm gonna hitch off on a tangent here:

Come on people...the guy has paid his dues. OBVIOUSLY he screwed up...and he spent 18 months in prison. And frankly, who are we to say we shouldn't let the guy pursue life, liberty, and happiness, now that he's paid his dues? This is the United States of America. People get out of prison everyday. Some go on to be productive citizens, some don't. People have been convicted of manslaughter, and served less time. I'm not condoning the guy's actions - no way...but there are far more important issues we should be focused on.

And as far as Facebook goes...I don't want to be part of your "Mafia Wars crew", I'm probably not going to "support your cause", and I don't want anything to do with your "Sunshine Ranch"...I may have been your classmate, but I'm not into "Yearbook" - and I'm not going to "Send my friends a sunset", or a "full charm bracelet".

Come on people! Seriously...this is a huge drain on society. People who could be working on something productive, are instead quizzing themselves on "Who is your guardian angel", or "If I were a state, which one would I be?" or "How heartless are you?" Hahaha wow.

And a note to Mark Zuckerberg:

See MySpace. It could happen to you too.

New phone number

2009-08-13T19:01:00.002-04:00

This is just an update to let everyone know that I’ve switched to Google Voice - so check out my Facebook page for the new number.

My old number will continue to work for the foreseeable future, but please delete that old worn-out number, and switch to the new one! haha

Sorry for the dumb "hey everyone, I'm changing my phone number!" post - but the whole idea behind Google Voice is that this should be the last time I'll ever have to do this...

Cheers. :-)

Google Voice

2009-08-04T21:19:00.001-04:00

A few days ago a buddy asked me why Google Voice. This was my response:

There's no hugely obvious reason to switch to google voice, but by switching there are some really nice features that you don't get with a regular cellphone number. The biggest reasons for me are:

1) I hate voice mail, and google voice allows you to view your voice mail visually by signing into google voice online, and managing it there. Google also transcribes your voice mail into text. Same with text messages. If you lose your phone, you can sign into google voice, text all your buddies, and let them know what's up.

2) Google voice allows you to manage different contacts in groups. Basically that some people (friends) receive different treatment by the system than others (your boss, future employers, etc.). You can record different greetings, set up different privacy schemes, etc. using groups of contacts. Of course the contacts are identical to the contacts you have in Gmail.

3) Call forwarding. You can forward your google voice calls to whatever number(s) you want. If I go home for the weekend, and I decide I don't want to take my cell with me, I forward the calls to my parent's phone. If I'm at work, I can have all my calls ringed to my work phone AND my cell phone - and then answer whichever one is more convenient at the time. Call forwarding is nothing new, but google voice allows it to multiple phones, and it's a lot easier.

4) I chose a number local to my parents. Now they can reach me on my cell phone by dialing a local number from their landline.

Here's a good article to read that pretty much says the same thing I just said:

http://lifehacker.com/5304800/google-voice-is-cool-but-do-you-need-it

.JPG vs. RAW

2009-07-21T22:21:00.002-04:00

Holy crap. I just compared a .jpg that I downloaded from Picasa to the identical .NEF (RAW) image from my camera. The .jpg looks terrible. It's way, way, waaaay darker.

Crap. I'm glad I figured this out.

Now gotta figure out how to fix...problem is, Picasa is doing the file conversion when I upload the photos. If I set the camera to take .jpg images in high res, I'm wondering if they'll look as good (or close) to the .NEF (RAW) images???

My hope is that Picasa is screwing them up, and that .jpg are not really THAT much lesser quality than the RAW images.

Problem is, right now there's not any point in even uploading the .jpgs, they look so terrible. I don't want ALL my pictures to look that bad.

On the flip side, none of the online photo hosting sites handle RAW images. I thought SmugMug did, but it's a real pain in the ass...not worth it.

Nikon has its own hosting service, but it's probably expensive, and not very user-friendly.

Crap, I can't BELIEVE how bad the .jpgs look coming out of picasa....

Anyone have any ideas?

Cool developments this week

2009-05-14T21:22:00.006-04:00

I found out about a couple of cool things this week.

New York Times Desktop App

First, the New York Times now has a desktop app running on the Adobe AIR platform. I downloaded it, and it's pretty cool. It's about as close to the real thing that I've seen as far newspaper websites and mobile sites go. The most intriguing thing though is the fact that this app isn't free. The Times plans to charge $3.45/week for full access - and for the first time, I think this is something people might actually pay for. The app provides such a rich experience that I think people will (literally) buy into it. If it works for the Times, I'm really curious to see if it works for other newspapers, and especially local newspapers.

MiFi

The other development that's kinda gaining a lot of buzz is mifi. The idea here is that you'll be able to split a 3G signal with a portable router = no more reliance on DSL, cable, T1 lines. You'll be able to pitch the mifi device in the middle of a park, or at the beach, and your friends can surf the web while catching rays. So far, I've seen plans for a Sprint device and a Verizon device. I'm hoping that once these things come out, my parents (who live in a rural area) will be able to break out of their dial-up funk and catch some wireless broadband.

Seesmic vs. TweetDeck

2009-05-06T21:28:00.005-04:00

I haven't spent much time on this yet, because I just started using Seesmic a couple days ago, but I'm already disgusted with it enough that I quit using it...at least for now. There are some issues:

1) I have my Twitter and Facebook accounts synced...when I update Twitter, it's supposed to update Facebook too. On Seesmic, for some reason, it doesn't work. I have to do both, separately, which brings me to the next problem:

2) You can't (as near as I can tell) update Twitter and Facebook at the same time. It doesn't give you the choice. THAT'S annoying, especially because of #1.

3) One of the reasons I wanted to try Seesmic is because I had read (from a bunch of sources) that it's Facebook integration was much better...One thing I noticed is that it bundles all the Facebook interaction together...i.e. when I write on someone's wall, it shows up looking exactly the same as if I had changed my status, and vice versa for others doing the same. Very confusing.

Granted, I'm running Seesmic on Linux, and I'm not sure it was intended to do so....but it's an AIR application, and I'm running AIR on Linux, so I see no reason why it shouldn't work...

Let me know if I'm completely off my rocker on this, but Seesmic seems totally inferior to TweetDeck.

*UPDATE* Apparently, Twitter's Facebook app is broken...hence the issues here. I'll test it out again once Twitter/Facebook get everything back under control...

A layman's economic prediction

2009-04-29T21:59:00.011-04:00

I'm not trying to be arrogant with this post...I'm a total layman when it comes to economics. I took an economics course when I was at MSU - but at the time, economics was about the least interesting subject I could possibly imagine. Since then, I've become fascinated by the economics, although still, I'm most certainly ignorant by comparison to anyone who has formally studied the subject.

But with that said, I think I can actually boast that on some level, I predicted the economic crisis we're now working through. To my untrained eye, there were a lot of indicators (although not the financial ones they speak of on CNBC) that raised my eyebrows - as far back as summer 2003.

PAST PREDICTIONS...

In June 2003 I took a new job, and moved to Traverse City. I immediately started looking for a house to buy. I had an acquaintance who worked for Merrill Lynch, and as soon as he heard about my plans to get into a house, he gave me a call, and tried his darnedest to get me into an "interest-only" loan on a 5-year balloon. I was pretty naive, and this sort of loan really appealed to me because he said it would enable someone like me to buy a REALLY nice house - certainly much nicer than what I could have afforded with a more traditional, fixed rate loan. He even said that if my parents were willing to cosign for this loan, that I would most certainly be approved, and be ready to put my new-found buying power into my dream house...not only that, but he was confident that when the balloon rate ended, that I'd be able to refinance on the equity of the house, because surely a house in Traverse City would be worth way more when it was time to refinance in 2008...

Thank goodness my Dad is a pretty smart guy. I told him about my plan to apply for the interest-only loan, and he kinda laughed before asking "are you serious?". He quickly explained to me that interest-only balloons were a disaster waiting to happen. I called the guy back, and went with a traditional loan from my credit union.

I used to drive a truck. For a few years, I thought it was the stylish thing to do, and without regard to the amount of money I spent filling up the gas tank, I continued to love driving a truck. Sometime around the middle of 2004, my love-affair with truck-driving began to unravel as gas prices slipped past the $2.00/gallon mark. At the time, I was living in Traverse City, and I was making a lot of trips to Detroit and Lansing to see friends - and in doing so, I realized that my gas-guzzling truck was drinking down about $40-$50 in fuel for each trip I made "downstate". Ultimately, I realized that my truck-driving ways were absurd, and I went radical and bought a TDI (diesel) VW Golf. My fuel consumption immediately dropped by about 60% (the TDI gets somewhere between 38-46 mpg). Eventually, as I continued to watch gas prices climb, I realized that the demand for gas-guzzling SUV's was taking a hit. I remember a conversation I had at the time with my friend Jake, and I predicted (somewhat arbitrarily) that when gas hit $4.00/gallon, the American/Big Three car companies were going to crash because they didn't make any good small cars, and thus were wholly unprepared to deal with fuel prices above $2.00/gallon...I looked at my own budget and realized that if I was driving a truck, $4.00 gas would absolutely devastate my finances.

Soon after - in the summer of 2005, I moved back to the Lansing area. I started to consider the possibility of buying a house or condo, and eventually I found a brand-new 1-bedroom condo in East Lansing that I really liked. The condo was about 650 square feet (tiny), and the developer was asking $115,000. At first, I thought the price was outrageous - but I warmed up after I kinda shopped around, and realized that $115,000 was sort of the "going rate" for a small condo in East Lansing. I decided to apply for a loan, and as I was waiting for my loan approval, I got to thinking about an old mantra I had learned a few years earlier when I was working a lot with builders: builders at that time were charging somewhere around $100/sq. ft. for a "starter home". I did the math: my East Lansing condo was $177/sq. ft. I immediately wrote a new "lowball" offer and sent it to the developer only to have it rejected without a word a day or so later. I decided not to make any more offers because it just seemed to me that real estate was inflated, and that the prices just didn't seem realistic or sustainable...

...COME TRUE

Last summer, Merrill Lynch became one of the first Wall Street big-whig casualties as it was forced to write down failed loans, and lost $19.2 billion ($52 million/day) between July 2007 and July 2008.

Last summer, fuel prices reached into the upper $4.00 range, and people quit buying the large, high-profit vehicles that the Big Three made a fortune selling back in the 90's and early half of this decade. It devastated the industry, and GM/Ford/Chrysler are reeling to adjust.

And today, you can drive past that same condo development in East Lansing, and the sign out front advertises prices that are 30% lower than they were back in 2005...and 20% lower than what I offered four years ago.

WHAT'S THE DEAL?

Last week, BusinessWeek featured a front-page article that raised questions about economists, and their collective failure to predict the economic crisis. How can they screw up so badly, when someone like me with virtually no finance education, saw the writing on the wall as far back as 2004?

Correct me if I'm wrong, but as I see it, the problem is that economics is a very difficult field to study using experimentation. It's virtually impossible to "experiment" with economics. Economists have to wait until disaster strikes, and then they spend years, or decades trying to figure out what happened, and what could have prevented the disaster. People are still trying to figure out the depression, and they're still trying to come to agreement on the legacy of the "Reaganomics" of the 80's. The economists just don't know.

Additionally, economics is closely tied to psychology. Not only do economists have to try to figure out the finance element of their predictions, but they also have to try and account for the mental elements - basically, what causes people to save vs. what causes people to buy?

Economics is also uniquely tied to politics - which means that here in the US, the economic policy ebbs and flows with the ebb and flow of our partisan politics. In years of republican control, the economic policy tends to be conservative...in years of democratic control, the policy shifts back to liberal. There's a complete lack of consistency.

UH OH...

Unfortunately, my latest sense is that this economy might not be close to a rebound...certainly not as close as what people hope.

These are the problems I see...and the Economist too.

1) Unemployment is still rising.

People (like me) are freaking out, wondering if they're going to have a job next month, next week, or tomorrow. When people freak out wondering about their jobs, they save money. When people save money, they aren't buying anything. When people don't buy stuff, manufacturers quit making stuff, and they lay more people off. Until unemployment stabilizes, or starts trending back downward, the economy is going to be scary.

2) Real estate hasn't quite hit the floor yet.

I don't think real estate has hit a floor. I'll admit that homes have started moving again, and that's a good thing - but I'm a little bit concerned about cash buyers (who create a "fake" uptick in demand), and the fact that there is a glut of foreclosures that are still sitting on the market. Until the foreclosure properties have been bought up, and the cash buyers disappear, there really isn't going to be a true rebound in the market. I define a true rebound to be the point where the properties are being bought up by homeowner "end-users" (a term I picked up from my friend Grant) - and not the cash-buying landlords and investment firms.

3) The automotive industry is FAR, FAR away from getting itself straightened out.

If any of the Big Three declare bankruptcy, it will throw the rustbelt into a whole new tailspin as the creditors are hung out to dry (think suppliers, bondholders, and municipalities). The midwest consumer has far-reaching effects on the nation's economy, and if one of the Big Three goes down, the recovery here will be put on hold another 6 months...at least.

LOOKING AHEAD

But the good part is.....There are some positives.

1) Inventories are running out. Initially, this might seem like a bad thing, but it's not. As inventories run out, demand for product increases, and when demand for product increases, production goes back online, and people get their jobs back.

2) Governments around the world, and especially here in the US have injected a massive amount of liquidity into the banks in an effort to get them lending again. It looks like maybe the banks are finally getting comfortable loaning money to consumers, and with the interest rates as low as they are, the US treasury is doling out ridiculously cheap money.

3) With the available cheap money, and a new willingness to hand out loans, people will start making big-ticket purchases again, and this will be good for real estate, as the "end-users" I mentioned earlier start buying single-family homes, and rebuilding our neighborhoods. Eventually, the demand will increase, and people will find good investment in homes and real estate.

4) Tough times breed ingenuity. When people lose their jobs, they're often forced into working for themselves, or learning new skills. Sometimes this leads to new ideas or people figure out that the job they've had for the past ten years didn't allow them to fully tap their talents. Additionally, companies are forced to get innovative when times are tough. Budgets are stretched, and people find they have to work harder to glean profits.

So with that being said, there are a lot of things to look forward to - although it may take longer than we anticipate. Hopefully our automotives can hold it together, and if so, the worst of theis downturn will be behind us, and unemployment will smooth out by late summer. If not, we're looking at early or mid-2010 before we can expect any sort of major sustaining upswing...

Today's catchy stuff from the web

2009-04-27T20:57:00.006-04:00

Verizon + Apple = new iPhone-ish device - Looks like Verizon and Apple are in talks to partner with some kind of Verizon/Apple hardware similar to an iPhone.

Portfolio magazine folds - This post from TechCrunch makes some great points about print media and the competition with web-based media.

New DJ mix posted (house and techno)

2009-04-26T10:06:00.003-04:00

I just posted a new house/techno mix that I recorded in haste last night at Jake's place. Feel free to download and listen here. Let me know what you think...

Photo hosting sites compared

2009-04-24T21:21:00.009-04:00

Since I went through this debate recently, and since one of my friends is going through it now, I decided to take a crack at comparing some of the internet's photo hosting/sharing sites. I'll begin by saying that when I went through this a few months ago, I decided on Picasa (Google), mostly because I'm already a Google freak and therefore I can seamlessly intergrate my photos into my blog, email, etc. without using multiple logins. Also, Picasa lets me save/share full resolution images (which is something Kodak Gallery wasn't allowing me to do). I ended up paying Google $20 for a year and 10 gigs of storage. Since I shoot RAW images that are about 8mb each, I'm going to run over the 10 gb soon, and will probably have to upgrade my storage package. The ONLY downside that I've encountered with Picasa is that it won't store RAW images - it converts them to jpeg.

So with that being said, I came up with a comparison spreadsheet containing all the features I think are important. Feel free to comment with anything I should add, correct, or consider.

Today's catchy stuff from the web

2009-04-23T21:28:00.007-04:00

Polaris Adobe AIR Application - Lets you run your Google Analytics numbers on your desktop. And, this is important...it seems to run in real-time...(NICE!)

Tweet your home energy use - Haha, how's that for geeky?

Sweet Juniper - Pretty cool Detroit blog about a couple raising their kids.

Woopra - Real-time analytics

Cold Fusion - Is cold fusion on the horizon?

Today's catchy stuff from the web

2009-04-22T21:26:00.006-04:00

Maureen Dowd on Twitter (New York Times)

Shrinking Flint (New York Times)

Professional Blogging #1 (Read Write Web)

Professional Blogging #2 (Wall Street Journal)

Six Ways You Should Be Using Twitter (Lifehacker)

High Speed Rail (U.S. Dept. of Transportation - Federal Railroad Administration)

Things that I like / don't like

2009-04-20T22:02:00.034-04:00

Like: Mass Transit

Lately there has been lots of talk about using stimulus funds to build regional high speed rail networks. Thank goodness...after visiting Germany last year, I'm a believer.

Don't like: Dress codes/Long lines at bars/Suited doormen

Alright seriously...this is Lansing, and in Lansing there just isn't any need for this...ANY of this. I don't mean that as a knock on Lansing, I just mean that I kinda like Lansing's unpretentious character. Besides, cool bars are cool and trendy not because they have a dress code, long lines, or suited doormen, but because they attract people who are cool...If your bar isn't attracting the clientèle you're aiming for, then do something different, like charging a bigger cover, or playing better music, or having a better atmosphere.

Like: Free online newspaper content

The Associated Press wants a piece of Google's (and Yahoo's) ad revenue from its content - the AP doesn't like news aggregators to score advertising revenue off the free content it gleans from the web. So that's cool, I understand...just don't start charging consumers for the content and taking away the "freeness" of it, and I (and everyone else) will be happy. If Google and Yahoo wants to sells their ads, then let them pay the royalties, and keep it free for the consumer.

Don't like: Voicemail

See my post here.

Like: Turntables (analog/vinyl)

Real DJ's learned on turntables...with vinyl records. Techno was invented in Detroit, and those guys spin on vinyl. Nothing looks cooler than a set of tec 12's and a dude (or girl) jockeying about, throwing 12" vinyl around. And the sound is incredible.

Don't like: Turntables (digital/cd)

Real DJ's learned on turntables...with vinyl records. They may not use them anymore, but at least they can. I met a guy last summer who was apparently a local club DJ in Detroit. Jake and I had turntables set up, and we offered him a spin...except he didn't know how...since he had learned using digital decks, he couldn't figure out how the whole vinyl thing worked...

Like: Linux

The nerd's operating system. I haven't reached nerd status (as far as computers go), but I'm trying. Linux is free, there are a ton of different versions, and it does most anything that Windows does. Also, it's open source, so everyone in the world has the opportunity to make it better.

Don't like: Windows

Expensive, unreliable, resource hog. And it's made by Microsoft. Need I say more?

Like: Cloud computing/remote storage

Accessible from anywhere. Cheap. Reliable. If your hard drive crashes, it really doesn't matter.

Don't like: Local storage

Unless your machine is networked, the data is only accessible from your desktop - which means you've got to lug your machine around. If your hard drive crashes or your gear is stolen, then your stuff is gone.

March/April Photography

2009-04-18T10:39:00.016-04:00

Some photos I've taken in the past few weeks:

One of the first signs of a thawing winter - early March is the time for making maple syrup

Michigan's Capitol in the evening

A brief renewal for Detroit: The 2009 Final Four

Packard's famous doorway - so much so that someone bought it on eBay as a collector's item

An endless, empty factory. Highland Park's Packard plant seems to go on forever

The ultimate sign of summer to come: America's Pastime

UPDATE: Lansing Meal Deals

2009-04-18T10:02:00.002-04:00

Per some suggestions from friends, I just updated the "Lansing Meal Deals" site. Enjoy!

How do you communicate?

2009-04-14T19:55:00.011-04:00

Today I was reading an article/interview in Businessweek about Research In Motion (RIM), the makers of BlackBerry mobile devices. Basically, what I gleaned from the article (and what everyone seems to know already) is that the Apple iPhone seems to be the smartphone that every communication device maker tries to emulate. The iPhone has enjoyed enormous success - remarkable, since it's only supported by one wireless carrier (AT&T) and the BlackBerry is supported by several. I started wondering: why isn't RIM more of a competitor?

I realized that the whole idea of a BlackBerry revolves around mobile email access, and that the devices really aren't much more useful than a bare-bones wireless device. In fact, I recently discovered an application that essentially turned my bare-bones wireless phone into an email machine - it even alerts me when I have email - much like a BlackBerry.

So what's the problem?

I realized I hardly ever send email anymore. In fact, in the past week I've sent exactly 18 emails. Of those, five of them were to myself (I tend to use email when I need to remind myself of something to do later).

So in the past week, I've used email 13 times to communicate with other people. This got me thinking about my communication habits, and my curiosity got the best of me: in the same week I've sent 124 text messages, and used my phone 20 times to call people. I estimate that in the same time, I've posted 15 updates on Twitter, and the same on Facebook. I've probably used Facebook another 20-30 times to communicate directly with people.

I realized that in the age of Facebook, Twitter, and widespread wireless integration, it's possible that email and traditional voice calls have been largely replaced by more flexible, more interactive, or even more simple forms of communication. Twitter allows us to update or call out to people on a massive scale. Facebook allows us to be interactive - to use photos, songs, or event invitations to communicate. Texting allows us to get in touch with people on the fly.

So what's this mean? What it means to me is that if other people's communication habits are anything like my own, then the BlackBerry isn't really a competitor to the iPhone. The iPhone is designed to run applications - if you visit the iPhone App Store, you can find an application for just about anything, including email. The difference between the iPhone and the BlackBerry is that one device is marketed to those who use email, and one device is marketed to those who want flexibility in what their phone will do.

Only recently has RIM figured out what Apple has known for a long time, and they've opened their own application store: BlackBerry App World. I'm sure this will bring RIM more in step with what consumers want and need these days, but what about the bigger question: how are people's communications needs changing? What are the trends? Who are going to be the innovators who accurately predict how people will communicate in the future? Is this the end of communication innovation, or is something new going to evolve that takes us beyond the smartphone? And how will the effectiveness of our communications evolve or suffer as a byproduct of using the technology? (see concerns expressed in the anonymous comment in my voicemail post)

What do you think? What are your communication habits?

Death to voicemail

2009-04-07T20:22:00.008-04:00

Today I ran across an article in the NY Times, which questioned the relevance of voicemail in the age of text messaging, email, and social networking.

I couldn't agree more - the continued use of voicemail should be questioned.

For months, I've been asking friends and family to quit leaving me voicemail...I've spent way too much time dialing the voicemail number, punching in my password, and listening to long, drawn-out messages about why I need to call someone back, when I should call them back, and what we need to talk about when I do call them back.

"Please leave a detailed message with your name, phone number, and the time that you called..."

Hahaha, are you serious???

Not only that, but I have to sift through ALL of the previous voicemails people have left (often they're new, because I refuse to take the time to check them), so that by the time I do go through my voicemail, it's at least a 15-minute process.

Case in point: This past weekend I was in downtown Detroit for the MSU basketball game v. UConn. The venue was loud, people were everywhere, lots of screaming and cheering, etc. - but somehow, friends managed to leave me at least two voicemails - the crazy thing was, these people were in the SAME building I was in, and to think that they actually thought I could hear their voicemail is somewhat hilarious...

Sending a text message is a whole lot easier...and quite frankly, 99 times out of 100 the caller ID suffices.

So here it is: I propose we all drop voicemail and get with the times - text message or no message will save us all a lot of wasted time and frustration.