The spikes correspond with the three intermissions, and with the immediate aftermath of Crosby’s sudden-death goal and the medal ceremony. Epcor, the company that runs Edmonton’s water system, produced a similar graph for that city on the same afternoon, with the previous day’s spikeless consumption superimposed in green:

Hat tip: R.S.

Ira Glass, host of the great National Public Radio show This American Life, calls OK Go “living catnip.” They direct their own videos, shoot them on shoe-string budgets, and, in the words of singer Damian Kulash, Jr., “we see them as creative works and not as our record company’s marketing tool.”

In a recent New York Time op-ed piece, Kulash explained how OK Go posted its homemade 2006 video, “Here it goes again,” on YouTube without record company EMI’s knowledge or permission, a technical violation of its recording contract. The video won a Grammy, tens of millions of fans saw it, thousands poured into OK Go’s concerts, and EMI made lots of money.

How did the record company react? By pressuring YouTube to curb the viral spread of its videos. Technically, they did this by blocking embedding. Kulash explains after the jump:

Embedded videos — those hosted by YouTube but streamed on blogs and other Web sites — don’t generate any revenue for record companies, so EMI disabled the embedding feature. Now we can’t post the YouTube versions of our videos on our own site, nor can our fans post them on theirs. If you want to watch them, you have to do so on YouTube.

But this isn’t how the Internet works. Viral content doesn’t spread just from primary sources like YouTube or Flickr. Blogs, Web sites and video aggregators serve as cultural curators, daily collecting the items that will interest their audiences the most. By ignoring the power of these tastemakers, our record company is cutting off its nose to spite its face.

The numbers are shocking: When EMI disabled the embedding feature, views of our treadmill video dropped 90 percent, from about 10,000 per day to just over 1,000. Our last royalty statement from the label, which covered six months of streams, shows a whopping $27.77 credit to our account.

Clearly the embedding restriction is bad news for our band, but is it worth it for EMI? The terms of YouTube’s deals with record companies aren’t public, but news reports say that the labels receive $.004 to $.008 per stream, so the most EMI could have grossed for the streams in question is a little over $5,400.

Someone at EMI must read the New York Times, because I was able to embed the new video here. But Kulash’s Times piece is worth reading for insight into the dynamics of Internet content.

Not all record labels react this way. Some 44 million people viewed last year’s wacky YouTube wedding video, JK Wedding Dance Entrance, featuring the Chris Brown song Forever. Brown’s label didn’t insist that YouTube pull the video; they placed an link on the site allowing people to buy the tune on iTunes. Suddenly, as Cory Doctorow explained on Boing-Boing, Suddenly, a year after its original release, Forever rocketed back onto the charts with millions of fresh sales.

Hat tip: SBD.

Around this time of year, I like to dig out You May Know Them as Sea Urchins, Ma’am, Ray Guy’s 1975 collection of newspaper columns, and re-read the last essay in the book: “This Dear and Fine Country (Spina Sanctus).”

Well, we made it once again, boys! Winter is over.

Oh, but there is still snow on the ground.

So what? It hasn’t got a chance. It is living in jeopardy from day to day. We should pity it because it will soon be ready for the funeral parlour. It is only a matter of another few paltry weeks and we shall see it disappear into brown and foaming brooks; we shall see the meadows burning green and spangled with little piss-a-beds like tiny yellow suns. Winter is over.

Oh, but there is still ice on the water.

So what? The globe is turning and nothing can stop it. We are revolving into light.
The fisherman tars his boat on the beach and is heated by two suns, one in the sky and another reflected from the water, and the ice on the cliff behind him drips away to a poor skeleton.

It is only a matter of a few more paltry weeks and we shall see the steam rising from the ponds andfrom the damp ground behind the plow; we shall see the grandmother sitting out by the doorstep for a few minutes watching the cat; we shall see the small boats a’bustle, piled high with lobster pots in the bow, and the days melting further and further into the night.

Winter is over now.

Praise God and all honour to our forefathers through generations who did
never forsake this dear and fine country.

Ray Guy is a Newfoundland writer. The joke underlying the book title is that sea urchins are sometimes  called whore’s eggs on The Rock. The Latin phrase Spina Sanctus (sanctified by the thorn) was a motto used by George Calvert, the first Lord Baltimore, an early settler on Newfoundland’s Southern Shore.

The photograph shows the sun setting over Baddeck at 5:54 p.m. today, itself a sign that winter’s goose is cooked.

In very limited circumstances, anonymity is valuable and justified (e.g., when someone is risking something substantial to expose concealed wrongdoing of serious public interest).  But promiscuous, unjustified anonymity — which pervades the establishment press — is the linchpin of most bad, credibility-destroying reporting.  It enables government officials and others to lie to the public with impunity or manipulate them with propaganda, using eager reporters as both their megaphone and shield.  It is the weapon of choice for reporters eager to serve as loyal message-carriers and royal court gossip columnists.  It preserves and bolsters the culture of secrecy that dominates Washington — exactly the opposite of what a real journalist, by definition, would seek to accomplish (though most modern journalists seem to prefer anonymity, as it makes them appear and feel special and part of the secret halls of power, and allows them to curry favor with powerful officials as their favored loyal message-carrier).  In sum, petty or otherwise unjustified uses of anonymity are the hallmark of the power-worshiping, dishonest, unreliable reporter (which is why its most indiscriminate practitioner is Politico).   As Izzy Stone put it about the Vietnam War:  ”The process of brain-washing the public starts with off-the-record briefings for newspapermen. . . .”

This is part of a syndrome of “if in doubt, blame the unions.”  So convenient.  So wrong.

A few years ago I was taking a tour of the new Toronto opera house.  We were allowed to go everywhere except on stage, even though the stage was bare, with no current production going on.

One of the tour members asked the docent why we couldn’t go on stage.  The tour member said he had been on tours of all the great opera houses of Europe and had never been barred from the stage.  The docent looked serious and said “union rules.”  All of the tour members (except me) nodded their heads sagely in rueful agreement.

It just so happened that I had an interview with the head of the International Alliance of Theatrical Stage Employees (the stagehands’ union) on another matter later that day.  So I asked him if this were true.  He got very angry and told me that there was no union rule, no union prohibition and, in fact, the union was very much in favour of tours visiting the stage when there was no production going on.  He said that “union rules” have become a pernicious legend in his field.  I later phoned the management of the opera house to complain about the docent’s mistake.

What I found most interesting was not the docent’s duplicity but the tour group’s acceptance of it.  As a former union staffer and a person who researches and teaches about unions, I’m amazed at the difference between the real power that they actually lack and the perceived power people think they have.

As I said before, I regret making the union issue part of this discussion, because it permits people like Larry to wrap themselves in solidarity’s flag and ignore the core issues:

1. In the management of risk, our society increasingly allows knee-jerk caution to trump common sense, and important social values like child-rearing suffer as a consequence.
2. After their sub-par performance during Hurricane Juan was criticized, Environment Canada and the CBC began to over-hype forecasts of routine weather. Ironically, this monomaniacal focus on safety has created a very unsafe situation.
3. Senior managers in our school system either belong, or kinda-sorta belong, to the teachers’ union. The apparent willingness of class-struggle buffs like Larry to countenance this absurdity is astounding.
4. We have far too many snow days, and the ones we have apply to far too wide an area.

I honestly don’t know whether point three plays any major role in point four, but it ought to be changed anyway. No one above the level of small-school teaching principals ought to belong to the Teacher’s Union, and the law should be changed to reflect this.

As for the accelerating trend toward a New Jerusalem of ‘fraidy cats, Contrarian will continue to rail.

[T]he key factor [in school closures] is the collective agreement which has been in place in Nova Scotia since the mid-1970s. In that sense, the Education Department is just as culpable as the NSTU.

The teachers’ agreement originally included an understanding that about five days a year would be written off as “throw-away” snow days. The Agreement with the NSTU also stipulates that if buses are cancelled and schools closed to students, then teachers do not have to report for duty. This is very unusual and has been eliminated in most other provinces.

What’s the impact?  No one in NS worries if four or five days are lost each year. The problem only surfaced when school boards canelled from eight to 14 full days last school year. Then it became apparent to everyone that there was no provising for reclaiming lost days, or any real policy to contain or even limit cancellations.

I am just completing a major comparative study of school storm days, demonstrating conclusively that Maritimers are the biggest “fraidy cats” of them all.  It also shows that Maritimers are the outliers when it comes to protecting valuable teaching-learning time and that this is a major factor contributing to our chronic “below Canadian average” student performance results.

Recent research at Children’s Hospital in Boston, reported in the journal Nature, suggests that a gene (gene 231) on the extra chromosome (chromosome 21) carried by people with DS may inhibit cancer by blocking the activity of a protein tumors need to grow. Money quote:

The gene suppresses the growth of new blood vessels that cancers need by blocking the activity of the protein calcineurin, suggesting a new target for future cancer drugs. The investigators… add that chromosome 21 might possess four or five anti-angiogenesis genes.

Since when are school administrators (who make decisions about snow days) part of the teachers’ union? [TB]

Snow days are decided upon by the School Board. The teachers and their union have nothing to do with it. Teachers have to show up on snow days to babysit any kids dropped off by parents. The fact that you are so silly as to blame Unions—good heavens how silly!—I have now figured you out: Another Conservative who will blame the victims for all the country’s ills. [AMcG]

At least in HRSB, the school officials who make the call are school board Superintendents – not unionized, but management. [AB]

Another possible explanation is the requirement to please big, risk-averse insurance companies. [BW]

OK, so now I’ve done what I should have done before posting, checked with Peter McLaughlin, my ex-Daily News colleague who now speaks for the Nova Scotia Department of Education. Turns out the situation is at once more complicated than I suggested, and less clearcut than my interlocutors believe. Full explanation after the jump.

Who is in the union? The Education Act defines a teacher as a person who holds a N.S. teaching certificate and is employed in teaching, supervisory or other professional capacity relating to education. Directors, curriculum supervisors, and even assistant superintendents who are employed as teachers are covered under article 44 of the Teachers’ Provincial Agreement and are members of the NSTU.

What about superintendents? McLaughlin explains:

The question about Superintendents is a little tricky. They are technically excluded under of the Teachers’ Collective Bargaining Act (TCBA) as members of the Nova Scotia Teachers’ Union; however they are entitled to all the benefits negotiated by the Union for teachers under the TCBA.

Who makes the storm day call? For most boards, it’s the superintendent or her delegate, on advice from the board’s transportation staff, Transportation Department dispatchers, Environment Canada, and even private weather analysts. Carol Olson, superintendent of the Halifax Regional School Board, explains the process in an (extremely slow-loading) video on the board website. Money quote:

The decision is never easy, but let me assure you, it’s always made with the safety of students and staff in mind.

The fact that senior managers in the school system are either unionized, or sorta-kinda unionized, is absurd and ought to be changed by the first government with the gumption to take on the teachers’ union. But I regret raising this issue here because it diverts attention from my central point: the increasing tendency for boards to cancel school at the first rumor of a snowflake.

Ms. Olson’s comment goes to the heart of the issue. Risks to student and staff safety are factors to be managed, but we should not imagine that we can manage them down to zero. We live in Nova Scotia where winter driving conditions are a fact of life. The additional risk of driving in bad weather must be balanced against other considerations. The only way to achieve absolutely certainty that no child is ever injured on the way to or from school is to do away with schools.

My beef is that these decisions have been getting more and more cautious in recent years. The Cape Breton Regional School Board’s cancellation of classes last Tuesday, a day on which there was no snow, no ice, and no wind, was an egregious example.

School boards in Nova Scotia cover vast territories with widely varying weather on any given day. When weather is unfit for travel in one corner of a district, it may be fine elsewhere, but boards tend to cancel classes throughout their territory. This suggests practice based more on the convenience of board staff rather than the students they serve.

School boards frequently keep schools open, but halt bus service on gravel roads. This creates two categories of students: one that gets a full year of instruction; another that gets shorted. It also means some parents will drive kids to school, and parental vehicles are less safe than school buses. So the result may be reduced safety.

The Environment Canada Weather Service’s post-Juan habit of continual wolf-crying, buttressed by a litany of scary sounding warnings, advisories, special statements, etc., none of which are ever explained to the public, makes the board’s task more difficult. A board attempting to exercise common sense will sometimes have to disregard the silly hype that has become standard in Canada’s official weather forecasts, and that’s hard for any bureaucrat charged with responsibility for child safety to do.

I hear people say they have begun to tune out Environment Canada (and CBC) weather forecasts, because it’s so hard to sort real warnings from exaggeration. Ironically, in their effort to be extra safety conscious, both organizations have increased the danger to the public, not lessened it.

The pub serves supper from 5:30 to 8; The fireside blogging discussion, upstairs in the lounge, will begin at 7, followed by live entertainment at 8. So come any time before 7.

Ridiculous. Ludicrous. How does this happen? Is it yet more proof that Environment Canada/CBC weather hysteria has destroyed our ability to distinguish normal weather from that which is dangerous? Is it further evidence of our society’s atrophied ability to assess and manage risk? Of our obsession with danger? Have we become a nation of ‘fraidy cats? A friend offers an alternative explanation:

They haven’t filled their quota of snow days.

Gotta get ‘em in, in other words, like the employee who makes sure to take all her available sick days, lest she “lose” them. And it’s well to remember that the school officials who manage these decisions belong to the belong to… the teachers’ union.