<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for webproductblog.com</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.webproductblog.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.webproductblog.com</link>
	<description>/* because great web products don´t happen by accident */</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 05:49:42 +0000</pubDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on 3 Quick Start SEO Guides for Beginners by Jerremy</title>
		<link>http://www.webproductblog.com/web-product-management/3-quick-start-seo-guides-for-beginners/#comment-63750</link>
		<dc:creator>Jerremy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Sep 2011 13:00:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webproductblog.com/?p=1443#comment-63750</guid>
		<description>Unfortunately those guides works only in theory in practice you need more powerful tools and techniques to improve your site rankings, but I guess for beginners they are alright, I would also add to list the SEO Bible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unfortunately those guides works only in theory in practice you need more powerful tools and techniques to improve your site rankings, but I guess for beginners they are alright, I would also add to list the SEO Bible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 111+ Web Analytics Tweeter You Must Follow by Stu Bowker</title>
		<link>http://www.webproductblog.com/web-analytics/111-web-analytics-tweeter-you-must-follow/#comment-41529</link>
		<dc:creator>Stu Bowker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2011 12:16:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webproductblog.com/?p=412#comment-41529</guid>
		<description>Just to let you know, I've updated my account alias, I'm no longer using gravy834, can you please change it to stubowker.
Thanks for spreading the Analytics love!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just to let you know, I&#8217;ve updated my account alias, I&#8217;m no longer using gravy834, can you please change it to stubowker.<br />
Thanks for spreading the Analytics love!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 5 Reasons Why I Don´t need Google Instant by SEO Quotes</title>
		<link>http://www.webproductblog.com/user-experience-design/5-reasons-why-i-dont-need-google-instant/#comment-36661</link>
		<dc:creator>SEO Quotes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2011 21:06:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webproductblog.com/?p=1506#comment-36661</guid>
		<description>me too I kind of annoyed w/ Google Instant, because I kind of automatically show result even you have no interest w/ LOL</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>me too I kind of annoyed w/ Google Instant, because I kind of automatically show result even you have no interest w/ LOL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 5 Reasons Why I Don´t need Google Instant by SEO company quotes</title>
		<link>http://www.webproductblog.com/user-experience-design/5-reasons-why-i-dont-need-google-instant/#comment-36037</link>
		<dc:creator>SEO company quotes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Apr 2011 21:42:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webproductblog.com/?p=1506#comment-36037</guid>
		<description>I really don't mind the Google instant, actually I don't use it but it's funny that others are just using for fun w/ all those different and random phrase that comes out when you search.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really don&#8217;t mind the Google instant, actually I don&#8217;t use it but it&#8217;s funny that others are just using for fun w/ all those different and random phrase that comes out when you search.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Google Chrome vs. Mozilla Firefox - The Browser Duel by chandu</title>
		<link>http://www.webproductblog.com/web-product-management/google-chrome-vs-firefox-browser-duel/#comment-27910</link>
		<dc:creator>chandu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Feb 2011 03:43:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webproductblog.com/?p=1249#comment-27910</guid>
		<description>Mozilla firefox is a standard one it always rockzzzzz...........</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mozilla firefox is a standard one it always rockzzzzz&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Clever SEO Keyword Grouping with Regex in Google Analytics by Joseph McCullough</title>
		<link>http://www.webproductblog.com/web-analytics/clever-seo-keyword-grouping-with-regex-in-google-analytics/#comment-25591</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph McCullough</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2011 01:47:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webproductblog.com/?p=1203#comment-25591</guid>
		<description>Awesome! I'm hoping more and more people will begin to see that Regex != form validation. There are so many uses for it. I even wrote an article about using RegEx in IDEs for productivity purposes. 

http://www.vertstudios.com/blog/using-regular-expressions-in-ides/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awesome! I&#8217;m hoping more and more people will begin to see that Regex != form validation. There are so many uses for it. I even wrote an article about using RegEx in IDEs for productivity purposes. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.vertstudios.com/blog/using-regular-expressions-in-ides/" rel="nofollow">http://www.vertstudios.com/blog/using-regular-expressions-in-ides/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Efficient SEO Site Analysis With Advanced Google Search Techniques by Fred Meek</title>
		<link>http://www.webproductblog.com/web-analytics/efficient-seo-site-analysis-with-advanced-google-search-techniques/#comment-22383</link>
		<dc:creator>Fred Meek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Dec 2010 15:10:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webproductblog.com/?p=878#comment-22383</guid>
		<description>The one tool I would add to this list would be SEO for Firefox. Great post, Thanks.
&lt;a href="http://www.mindboxseo.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;Austin SEO&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The one tool I would add to this list would be SEO for Firefox. Great post, Thanks.<br />
<a href="http://www.mindboxseo.com" rel="nofollow">Austin SEO</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Google Chrome vs. Mozilla Firefox - The Browser Duel by MAAZ</title>
		<link>http://www.webproductblog.com/web-product-management/google-chrome-vs-firefox-browser-duel/#comment-22209</link>
		<dc:creator>MAAZ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Dec 2010 03:13:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webproductblog.com/?p=1249#comment-22209</guid>
		<description>u cant remember passwords in google chrome. FIREFOX ROCKS ITS THE BEST</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>u cant remember passwords in google chrome. FIREFOX ROCKS ITS THE BEST</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Google Chrome vs. Mozilla Firefox - The Browser Duel by Haya</title>
		<link>http://www.webproductblog.com/web-product-management/google-chrome-vs-firefox-browser-duel/#comment-20851</link>
		<dc:creator>Haya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Dec 2010 16:20:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webproductblog.com/?p=1249#comment-20851</guid>
		<description>I just recently switched from Firefox to Google Chrome because Firefox was becoming to slow and frustrating to deal with. I can safely say after using Google Chrome alone for almost two months now that it is great! Like you mentioned, it does not slow down because i add plugs but stays effeciet and fast. I can truly say that i am satisfied.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just recently switched from Firefox to Google Chrome because Firefox was becoming to slow and frustrating to deal with. I can safely say after using Google Chrome alone for almost two months now that it is great! Like you mentioned, it does not slow down because i add plugs but stays effeciet and fast. I can truly say that i am satisfied.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on SEOLExA SEO Link Exchange Analyzer 1.0 Beta Release by Vibe</title>
		<link>http://www.webproductblog.com/web-analytics/seolexa-seo-link-exchange-analyzer-beta-release/#comment-20220</link>
		<dc:creator>Vibe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Dec 2010 07:00:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webproductblog.com/?p=1650#comment-20220</guid>
		<description>Hi,

I could not fully understand how I can use this tool.

Please tell me if I can access this for any site (even not my own)?

Thank you,
Vibe</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>I could not fully understand how I can use this tool.</p>
<p>Please tell me if I can access this for any site (even not my own)?</p>
<p>Thank you,<br />
Vibe</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Broken Link Analysis With The Free Tool Xenu Link Sleuth by The Dan</title>
		<link>http://www.webproductblog.com/web-analytics/broken-link-analysis-with-the-free-tool-xenu-link-sleuth/#comment-19592</link>
		<dc:creator>The Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Dec 2010 23:36:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webproductblog.com/?p=223#comment-19592</guid>
		<description>I've been using this tool for a good 6 months now. It's helped me patch up holes on a few of my sites, and also it is very handy when working on a new client''s already existing site (analyzing it and finding any broken links to repair). Much better than waiting for Webmaster Tools to find the dead links</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been using this tool for a good 6 months now. It&#8217;s helped me patch up holes on a few of my sites, and also it is very handy when working on a new client&#8217;&#8217;s already existing site (analyzing it and finding any broken links to repair). Much better than waiting for Webmaster Tools to find the dead links</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 5 Reasons Why I Don´t need Google Instant by WAP-Tek</title>
		<link>http://www.webproductblog.com/user-experience-design/5-reasons-why-i-dont-need-google-instant/#comment-18870</link>
		<dc:creator>WAP-Tek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Nov 2010 12:58:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webproductblog.com/?p=1506#comment-18870</guid>
		<description>0). to force google to get out of your way entirely ,
disable java and javascript only for google site (0p3ra + [F12] )

(1). set your homepage &amp; search page to
http://www.google.com/webhp?complete=0&amp;hl=en
or https://www.google.com/

(2). to MAKE google pay attention
make your homepage &amp; search page =
https://www.google.com/webhp?q=google+instant+sucks
they will not be able to ignore it !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>0). to force google to get out of your way entirely ,<br />
disable java and javascript only for google site (0p3ra + [F12] )</p>
<p>(1). set your homepage &amp; search page to<br />
<a href="http://www.google.com/webhp?complete=0&amp;hl=en" rel="nofollow">http://www.google.com/webhp?complete=0&amp;hl=en</a><br />
or <a href="https://www.google.com/" rel="nofollow">https://www.google.com/</a></p>
<p>(2). to MAKE google pay attention<br />
make your homepage &amp; search page =<br />
<a href="https://www.google.com/webhp?q=google+instant+sucks" rel="nofollow">https://www.google.com/webhp?q=google+instant+sucks</a><br />
they will not be able to ignore it !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Clever SEO Keyword Grouping with Regex in Google Analytics by Dan Patterson</title>
		<link>http://www.webproductblog.com/web-analytics/clever-seo-keyword-grouping-with-regex-in-google-analytics/#comment-18425</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Patterson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Nov 2010 17:22:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webproductblog.com/?p=1203#comment-18425</guid>
		<description>Great post. I use the &#124; all the time to pull up data sets but I'm sure that I could use the other expressions you've mentioned.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post. I use the | all the time to pull up data sets but I&#8217;m sure that I could use the other expressions you&#8217;ve mentioned.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Google Chrome vs. Mozilla Firefox - The Browser Duel by bill</title>
		<link>http://www.webproductblog.com/web-product-management/google-chrome-vs-firefox-browser-duel/#comment-18012</link>
		<dc:creator>bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Nov 2010 09:40:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webproductblog.com/?p=1249#comment-18012</guid>
		<description>yo i think mozilla is very good. google chrome is good but its slow poke</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yo i think mozilla is very good. google chrome is good but its slow poke</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 5 Reasons Why I Don´t need Google Instant by Thomas Fuchs-Martin</title>
		<link>http://www.webproductblog.com/user-experience-design/5-reasons-why-i-dont-need-google-instant/#comment-15848</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Fuchs-Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Oct 2010 12:31:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webproductblog.com/?p=1506#comment-15848</guid>
		<description>Hi David! I am OK with Google Suggestions, this is indeed sometimes interesting stuff, but what annoys me is the instant loading of new results without pressing the "Enter" key (Google Instant). 
It doesn´t help me to see all this irrelevant results while I am typing longer queries. If I want to type a long query with 4+ keywords I have to suffer from Google Instant results loading at least 3 times. Only way to avoid this is to switch it off or use browser toolbars.

cheers,</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi David! I am OK with Google Suggestions, this is indeed sometimes interesting stuff, but what annoys me is the instant loading of new results without pressing the &#8220;Enter&#8221; key (Google Instant).<br />
It doesn´t help me to see all this irrelevant results while I am typing longer queries. If I want to type a long query with 4+ keywords I have to suffer from Google Instant results loading at least 3 times. Only way to avoid this is to switch it off or use browser toolbars.</p>
<p>cheers,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 5 Reasons Why I Don´t need Google Instant by Beejay</title>
		<link>http://www.webproductblog.com/user-experience-design/5-reasons-why-i-dont-need-google-instant/#comment-15841</link>
		<dc:creator>Beejay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Oct 2010 11:22:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webproductblog.com/?p=1506#comment-15841</guid>
		<description>Google Instant, in fact, does not suck.  Your single reason for disliking Google Instant implies that you have the attention span of a 7-year-old.  If you were to finish your search query as usual, you would have been presented with a list of results immediately.  If this list of results did not provide something useful, a simple backspace and retyping of the last word or two would have garnered an entirely different list of results.  So, if you'd have searched for "Reasons why Google Instant sucks" and not received relevant results, you could have backspaced (your cursor would still be in the search box) over one word, and changed your query to "Reasons why Google Instant is not useful" to get an entirely different (and possibly slightly more professional) set of results.  

So, if you can manage to keep your attention on the search box for the 2.5 seconds it takes to type the entire query in the first place, Google Instant suddenly becomes useful, and does save you a few seconds.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google Instant, in fact, does not suck.  Your single reason for disliking Google Instant implies that you have the attention span of a 7-year-old.  If you were to finish your search query as usual, you would have been presented with a list of results immediately.  If this list of results did not provide something useful, a simple backspace and retyping of the last word or two would have garnered an entirely different list of results.  So, if you&#8217;d have searched for &#8220;Reasons why Google Instant sucks&#8221; and not received relevant results, you could have backspaced (your cursor would still be in the search box) over one word, and changed your query to &#8220;Reasons why Google Instant is not useful&#8221; to get an entirely different (and possibly slightly more professional) set of results.  </p>
<p>So, if you can manage to keep your attention on the search box for the 2.5 seconds it takes to type the entire query in the first place, Google Instant suddenly becomes useful, and does save you a few seconds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 5 Reasons Why I Don´t need Google Instant by David</title>
		<link>http://www.webproductblog.com/user-experience-design/5-reasons-why-i-dont-need-google-instant/#comment-15826</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Oct 2010 08:56:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webproductblog.com/?p=1506#comment-15826</guid>
		<description>GGL instant is also useful to avoid misspellings.
Knowing that the suggestions are the most searched terms (more people look for "reasons why I love you" than for "reasons why GGL instant sucks"), it does help many people. For the others, they just ignore the suggestions and continue typing as in the old one. So, you don't lose time, but may save some time sometimes...
GGL said they are working on including chrome in the FF search box (and obviously the chrome search box). They are obliged to do it as more than 50% of the queries come from there...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GGL instant is also useful to avoid misspellings.<br />
Knowing that the suggestions are the most searched terms (more people look for &#8220;reasons why I love you&#8221; than for &#8220;reasons why GGL instant sucks&#8221;), it does help many people. For the others, they just ignore the suggestions and continue typing as in the old one. So, you don&#8217;t lose time, but may save some time sometimes&#8230;<br />
GGL said they are working on including chrome in the FF search box (and obviously the chrome search box). They are obliged to do it as more than 50% of the queries come from there&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 5 Reasons Why I Don´t need Google Instant by SERPD</title>
		<link>http://www.webproductblog.com/user-experience-design/5-reasons-why-i-dont-need-google-instant/#comment-15783</link>
		<dc:creator>SERPD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Oct 2010 20:02:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webproductblog.com/?p=1506#comment-15783</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;5 Reasons Why I Don&acute;t need Google Instant...&lt;/strong&gt;

First of all: At the beginning I was pretty impressed by Google Instant, it was so fast, it was almost like magic how all this search results appeared. Taking into account how many extra queries this ......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>5 Reasons Why I Don&amp;acute;t need Google Instant&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>First of all: At the beginning I was pretty impressed by Google Instant, it was so fast, it was almost like magic how all this search results appeared. Taking into account how many extra queries this &#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 5 Reasons Why I Don´t need Google Instant by emory @ clickfire</title>
		<link>http://www.webproductblog.com/user-experience-design/5-reasons-why-i-dont-need-google-instant/#comment-15780</link>
		<dc:creator>emory @ clickfire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Oct 2010 19:24:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webproductblog.com/?p=1506#comment-15780</guid>
		<description>I have to say that I'm not convinced either. It's nifty. It's cute. It's fast. But useful?  I love the Stumbleupon analogy. So true.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to say that I&#8217;m not convinced either. It&#8217;s nifty. It&#8217;s cute. It&#8217;s fast. But useful?  I love the Stumbleupon analogy. So true.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 3 Quick Start SEO Guides for Beginners by Thomas Fuchs-Martin</title>
		<link>http://www.webproductblog.com/web-product-management/3-quick-start-seo-guides-for-beginners/#comment-15452</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Fuchs-Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Oct 2010 17:32:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webproductblog.com/?p=1443#comment-15452</guid>
		<description>Update! There is now a new version of the Google Seo Starter Guide available!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Update! There is now a new version of the Google Seo Starter Guide available!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.827 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2012-02-04 06:49:42 -->

