<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Design &amp; Society</title>
	
	<link>http://designandsociety.rsablogs.org.uk</link>
	<description>Emily Campbell's RSA blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 10:50:26 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/commentsfordesignandsociety" /><feedburner:info uri="commentsfordesignandsociety" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><item>
		<title>Comment on In-house or out: embedding design by Embedding design (why don’t you have a go?) « Inside the head of a designer</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/commentsfordesignandsociety/~3/FBqoJP0F1os/</link>
		<dc:creator>Embedding design (why don’t you have a go?) « Inside the head of a designer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 10:50:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://designandsociety.rsablogs.org.uk/?p=608#comment-593</guid>
		<description>[...] Campbell, who heads up the design and society team wrote a blog post on ‘In-house or out: embedding design’, summing up many of my [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Campbell, who heads up the design and society team wrote a blog post on &#8216;In-house or out: embedding design&#8217;, summing up many of my [...]</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/commentsfordesignandsociety/~4/FBqoJP0F1os" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://designandsociety.rsablogs.org.uk/2010/04/26/in-house-or-out-embedding-design/comment-page-1/#comment-593</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on In-house or out: embedding design by Kieran</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/commentsfordesignandsociety/~3/MQ4uMJgv_i0/</link>
		<dc:creator>Kieran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 May 2010 14:27:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://designandsociety.rsablogs.org.uk/?p=608#comment-591</guid>
		<description>Eighteen months ago, after a number of years working in graphic design studios, I took the tentative step into the role of the in-house designer at an HIV information charity. I had become disenchanted working in design studios, frustrated by the lack of interest in genuine user engagement in commercial graphic design practice. I couldn’t find a studio that shared my same focus on a people-centred approach to design so I looked elsewhere.

My move over to being “embedded” was not taken without reservations. I had concerns about the limitations of working continually on a single subject area; the difficulty of communicating the potential benefits of design to colleagues who did not think in the same terms; and also that I was alienating myself from working with other designers. I’m glad to say that these concerns proved to be unfounded. 

It’s true, as you say, that this type of work makes design harder to explain. Although some of my time is spent doing traditional graphic design tasks, a substantial amount is given to strategic thinking and speculative projects. The benefit to the organisation is that to buy in this kind of work is difficult from an economic point of view and hard to justify because it will not, in most cases, provide tangible end products. I’m uncomfortable with the term “design-thinking” – it sounds suspiciously like marketing speak – but there is a massive benefit to any organisation to have a team that bring together many ways of thinking be that creative, business, journalistic, scientific, literary...

Having design capabilities in-house allows organisations to visualise and prototype ideas in a way that can make things ‘real’ quickly; it can fuel ongoing discussion and can help to involve the wider organisation in the design process. Embedding design also has the benefit of helping to remove the client/designer power relationship that is always evident when design service is bought in from outside consultancies. Some of my colleagues have spoken of the difficulty of working with external designers due to the language barrier but also because they feel they have to back down to the expert knowledge of the designer – when you work day-to-day alongside your ‘client’ it makes it much more difficult to hide behind a veil of professional expertise.

I attended this weeks RSA Thursdays lecture where Nabeel Hamdi spoke persuasively about the need for architects and designers to think of themselves as “enablers rather than providers” and I think this a crucial point when considering the role of embedded design. A designer working in-house has the potential to enable others to take more ownership over the design process which can lead to more flexible and resourceful organisations. Particularly in the third sector this could provide huge benefit.

In my mind the biggest challenge will be recruitment as I believe in-house design work is held in low regard amongst most of the design profession – although as you can probably tell I’m a recent convert.

I look forward to reading the transcript of what is a timely debate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eighteen months ago, after a number of years working in graphic design studios, I took the tentative step into the role of the in-house designer at an HIV information charity. I had become disenchanted working in design studios, frustrated by the lack of interest in genuine user engagement in commercial graphic design practice. I couldn’t find a studio that shared my same focus on a people-centred approach to design so I looked elsewhere.</p>
<p>My move over to being “embedded” was not taken without reservations. I had concerns about the limitations of working continually on a single subject area; the difficulty of communicating the potential benefits of design to colleagues who did not think in the same terms; and also that I was alienating myself from working with other designers. I’m glad to say that these concerns proved to be unfounded. </p>
<p>It’s true, as you say, that this type of work makes design harder to explain. Although some of my time is spent doing traditional graphic design tasks, a substantial amount is given to strategic thinking and speculative projects. The benefit to the organisation is that to buy in this kind of work is difficult from an economic point of view and hard to justify because it will not, in most cases, provide tangible end products. I’m uncomfortable with the term “design-thinking” – it sounds suspiciously like marketing speak – but there is a massive benefit to any organisation to have a team that bring together many ways of thinking be that creative, business, journalistic, scientific, literary&#8230;</p>
<p>Having design capabilities in-house allows organisations to visualise and prototype ideas in a way that can make things ‘real’ quickly; it can fuel ongoing discussion and can help to involve the wider organisation in the design process. Embedding design also has the benefit of helping to remove the client/designer power relationship that is always evident when design service is bought in from outside consultancies. Some of my colleagues have spoken of the difficulty of working with external designers due to the language barrier but also because they feel they have to back down to the expert knowledge of the designer – when you work day-to-day alongside your ‘client’ it makes it much more difficult to hide behind a veil of professional expertise.</p>
<p>I attended this weeks RSA Thursdays lecture where Nabeel Hamdi spoke persuasively about the need for architects and designers to think of themselves as “enablers rather than providers” and I think this a crucial point when considering the role of embedded design. A designer working in-house has the potential to enable others to take more ownership over the design process which can lead to more flexible and resourceful organisations. Particularly in the third sector this could provide huge benefit.</p>
<p>In my mind the biggest challenge will be recruitment as I believe in-house design work is held in low regard amongst most of the design profession – although as you can probably tell I’m a recent convert.</p>
<p>I look forward to reading the transcript of what is a timely debate.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/commentsfordesignandsociety/~4/MQ4uMJgv_i0" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://designandsociety.rsablogs.org.uk/2010/04/26/in-house-or-out-embedding-design/comment-page-1/#comment-591</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on In-house or out: embedding design by tom p</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/commentsfordesignandsociety/~3/b6WBJayBs_A/</link>
		<dc:creator>tom p</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Apr 2010 13:23:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://designandsociety.rsablogs.org.uk/?p=608#comment-552</guid>
		<description>'the language barrier'... hooray that it is being addressed...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;the language barrier&#8217;&#8230; hooray that it is being addressed&#8230;</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/commentsfordesignandsociety/~4/b6WBJayBs_A" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://designandsociety.rsablogs.org.uk/2010/04/26/in-house-or-out-embedding-design/comment-page-1/#comment-552</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Hairshirty: a lovely conceit for the penitential season by Pharmd565</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/commentsfordesignandsociety/~3/yz5JsUU7Hyw/</link>
		<dc:creator>Pharmd565</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Apr 2010 12:54:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://designandsociety.rsablogs.org.uk/?p=593#comment-535</guid>
		<description>Hello! debckfd interesting debckfd site!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello! debckfd interesting debckfd site!</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/commentsfordesignandsociety/~4/yz5JsUU7Hyw" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://designandsociety.rsablogs.org.uk/2010/03/31/hairshirty-a-lovely-conceit-for-the-penitential-season/comment-page-1/#comment-535</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The meaning of business, the utility of craft and the great How? of our times by The meaning of business, the utility of craft and the great How? of our times « Creative Cultures Scotland</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/commentsfordesignandsociety/~3/dbOyL1_Ea68/</link>
		<dc:creator>The meaning of business, the utility of craft and the great How? of our times « Creative Cultures Scotland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 09:29:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://designandsociety.rsablogs.org.uk/?p=576#comment-523</guid>
		<description>[...] The meaning of business, the utility of craft and the great How? of our times. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The meaning of business, the utility of craft and the great How? of our times. [...]</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/commentsfordesignandsociety/~4/dbOyL1_Ea68" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://designandsociety.rsablogs.org.uk/2010/03/17/the-meaning-of-business-the-utility-of-craft-and-the-great-how-of-our-times/comment-page-1/#comment-523</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The meaning of business, the utility of craft and the great How? of our times by Emily Campbell</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/commentsfordesignandsociety/~3/onmJ9SYAhKM/</link>
		<dc:creator>Emily Campbell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 10:55:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://designandsociety.rsablogs.org.uk/?p=576#comment-520</guid>
		<description>Hi Michael - midwifery is an excellent example to put on the grand spectrum! I furthermore recommend Gabriel Weston's book &lt;em&gt;Direct Red &lt;/em&gt;for anyone seeking a sense of surgery as craft.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Michael &#8211; midwifery is an excellent example to put on the grand spectrum! I furthermore recommend Gabriel Weston&#8217;s book <em>Direct Red </em>for anyone seeking a sense of surgery as craft.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/commentsfordesignandsociety/~4/onmJ9SYAhKM" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://designandsociety.rsablogs.org.uk/2010/03/17/the-meaning-of-business-the-utility-of-craft-and-the-great-how-of-our-times/comment-page-1/#comment-520</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The meaning of business, the utility of craft and the great How? of our times by Emily Campbell</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/commentsfordesignandsociety/~3/7BxorwDsp10/</link>
		<dc:creator>Emily Campbell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 10:45:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://designandsociety.rsablogs.org.uk/?p=576#comment-519</guid>
		<description>Fair enough Richard. We'd all just listened to a couple of quite provocative stories which made the Samsung and Microsoft sessions  disappointing and a bit venal: my notes on John Mangelaars presentation include "the most successful shopping sites are the ones with customer reviews - people trust each other" and "We've got to work out how to customise content". After listening to a couple of people who were trying to shift the paradigm, these insights just came across as commonplace marketing ideas. It probably didn't help that master of ceremonies Vijay introduced them as (relatively) the "dinosaurs". Mangelaars finished by showing a truly dire video; really, I think many in the audience were wincing, especially at the woman towards the end who exclaimed of her new Microsoft product "It's sexy!".</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fair enough Richard. We&#8217;d all just listened to a couple of quite provocative stories which made the Samsung and Microsoft sessions  disappointing and a bit venal: my notes on John Mangelaars presentation include &#8220;the most successful shopping sites are the ones with customer reviews &#8211; people trust each other&#8221; and &#8220;We&#8217;ve got to work out how to customise content&#8221;. After listening to a couple of people who were trying to shift the paradigm, these insights just came across as commonplace marketing ideas. It probably didn&#8217;t help that master of ceremonies Vijay introduced them as (relatively) the &#8220;dinosaurs&#8221;. Mangelaars finished by showing a truly dire video; really, I think many in the audience were wincing, especially at the woman towards the end who exclaimed of her new Microsoft product &#8220;It&#8217;s sexy!&#8221;.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/commentsfordesignandsociety/~4/7BxorwDsp10" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://designandsociety.rsablogs.org.uk/2010/03/17/the-meaning-of-business-the-utility-of-craft-and-the-great-how-of-our-times/comment-page-1/#comment-519</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The meaning of business, the utility of craft and the great How? of our times by Michael Eden</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/commentsfordesignandsociety/~3/1NYTCcynXcY/</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Eden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 08:30:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://designandsociety.rsablogs.org.uk/?p=576#comment-518</guid>
		<description>Dear Emily,
I also attended the launch of Craft Matters as a 'Craft Champion' and was equally uncomfortable with the focus on the exquisite, bespoke, hand crafted object. I have laid out some of my thoughts in my blog at www.edenceramics.co.uk/diary.html. If you have a moment I would be very interested to hear your response to my last entry- 'The Midwife and the Gravedigger'
best wishes
Michael</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Emily,<br />
I also attended the launch of Craft Matters as a &#8216;Craft Champion&#8217; and was equally uncomfortable with the focus on the exquisite, bespoke, hand crafted object. I have laid out some of my thoughts in my blog at <a href="http://www.edenceramics.co.uk/diary.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.edenceramics.co.uk/diary.html</a>. If you have a moment I would be very interested to hear your response to my last entry- &#8216;The Midwife and the Gravedigger&#8217;<br />
best wishes<br />
Michael</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/commentsfordesignandsociety/~4/1NYTCcynXcY" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://designandsociety.rsablogs.org.uk/2010/03/17/the-meaning-of-business-the-utility-of-craft-and-the-great-how-of-our-times/comment-page-1/#comment-518</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The meaning of business, the utility of craft and the great How? of our times by Richard Banks</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/commentsfordesignandsociety/~3/IqnfdgSpFwA/</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Banks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 20:35:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://designandsociety.rsablogs.org.uk/?p=576#comment-517</guid>
		<description>Ouch. I'm curious to know more about what we (Microsoft) stand accused of. We're a big target, but I'd love to hear if there was anything original said.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ouch. I&#8217;m curious to know more about what we (Microsoft) stand accused of. We&#8217;re a big target, but I&#8217;d love to hear if there was anything original said.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/commentsfordesignandsociety/~4/IqnfdgSpFwA" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://designandsociety.rsablogs.org.uk/2010/03/17/the-meaning-of-business-the-utility-of-craft-and-the-great-how-of-our-times/comment-page-1/#comment-517</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Not exactly nonsense, but comfortable with uncertainty by Ben Adams</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/commentsfordesignandsociety/~3/Ixa42C3ju-k/</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Adams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 09:54:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://designandsociety.rsablogs.org.uk/?p=571#comment-514</guid>
		<description>Metabolicity indeed. I have started a register of poorly designed new language. Metabolicity is now there along with Metadesign. 

Other favourites include jeggings, webinar, diarise and trending.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Metabolicity indeed. I have started a register of poorly designed new language. Metabolicity is now there along with Metadesign. </p>
<p>Other favourites include jeggings, webinar, diarise and trending.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/commentsfordesignandsociety/~4/Ixa42C3ju-k" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://designandsociety.rsablogs.org.uk/2010/03/01/not-exactly-nonsense-but-comfortable-with-uncertainty/comment-page-1/#comment-514</feedburner:origLink></item>
</channel>
</rss>
