<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">

<channel>
	<title>CharlesNeville.com</title>
	
	<link>http://www.charlesneville.com</link>
	<description>a 360 degree marketing blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 08:51:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/charlesneville" /><feedburner:info uri="charlesneville" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><feedburner:emailServiceId>charlesneville</feedburner:emailServiceId><feedburner:feedburnerHostname>http://feedburner.google.com</feedburner:feedburnerHostname><item>
		<title>Reward and encourage enthusiasm, not just long service</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/charlesneville/~3/Yu3RV1JvvpI/</link>
		<comments>http://www.charlesneville.com/2010/03/reward-enthusiasm/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 09:42:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Charles</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Marketing Basics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guest Experience]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.charlesneville.com/?p=686</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A recent stay in hospital gave me a first person lesson in the difference between enthusiasm, professionalism and downright hostility.
During the 4 days I was there I and my ward-mates were looked after by a number of nurses of differing skill levels and ages. The student nurses were the most enthusiastic, friendly and generally interested [...]


<b>Related posts:</b><ul><li><a href='http://www.charlesneville.com/2009/12/service-with-a-snarl/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Service with a Snarl'>Service with a Snarl</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.charlesneville.com/2010/01/banding-together/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Banding Together'>Banding Together</a></li>
</ul>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-687" title="Old Boot" src="http://www.charlesneville.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/2495800489_ccdda98b6e_b-300x199.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="199" />A recent stay in hospital gave me a first person lesson in the difference between enthusiasm, professionalism and downright hostility.</p>
<p>During the 4 days I was there I and my ward-mates were looked after by a number of nurses of differing skill levels and ages. The student nurses were the most enthusiastic, friendly and generally interested in talking to us patients. They needed guidance from time to time, but hey, that&#8217;s why they&#8217;re students. The recently qualified were similar, efficient, and very personable. Those who had been in the job more than a few years were professional, thoughtful and helpful, though they&#8217;d seen it all before so getting into involved chats with patients wasn&#8217;t their thing.</p>
<p>The ones that stuck out like a sore thumb (pun intended) were the ones that must have been pretty close to retirement. It was clear that they viewed patients as an imposition on their TV time, they coughed on patients, ignored requests (from a guy confined to his bed!) for as long as they could, passing the buck onto the other. It was clear that they&#8217;d become jaded with the job, so bored that they seem to have turned it into a game with points going to the one who can treat patient the worst.</p>
<p>What does this have to do with marketing? Simple: It&#8217;s all about &#8216;guest experience&#8217;. Take a look at the people in your organisation. Have any of them become jaded, phoning in (or worse) their effort? Have customers become an inconvenience to them? Does giving anything more than the bare minimum seem like needless over-achieving?</p>
<p><span id="more-686"></span></p>
<p>Take action to either incentivise or just fire these people. They&#8217;re bringing the perceptions of your organisation right down. Your customers are facing a pot-luck as to whether they have a great, good, or awful experience with you.</p>
<p>Not sure how to test this?</p>
<ul>
<li>Look at whatever KPIs you can to compare staff</li>
<li>listen to interactions (though they may raise their game just when you&#8217;re around)</li>
<li>survey your customers (better still, survey the customers you may have just lost).</li>
</ul>
<p>As you do this, give praise to the people doing it right, learn from those that go above and beyond, put the spotlight on them and get everyone to raise their game.</p>
<p>Above all make sure that the &#8216;guest experience&#8217; that people get from your company is the one you had assumed they&#8217;re getting.</p>
<p>Image credit: <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/slightlynorth/2495800489/">slightlynorth</a> via Creative Commons on Flickr</p>


<p><b>Related posts:</b><ul><li><a href='http://www.charlesneville.com/2009/12/service-with-a-snarl/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Service with a Snarl'>Service with a Snarl</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.charlesneville.com/2010/01/banding-together/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Banding Together'>Banding Together</a></li>
</ul></p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/charlesneville/~4/Yu3RV1JvvpI" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.charlesneville.com/2010/03/reward-enthusiasm/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.charlesneville.com/2010/03/reward-enthusiasm/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Your cat will love outdoor advertising</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/charlesneville/~3/wCDjmZdLPEo/</link>
		<comments>http://www.charlesneville.com/2010/02/your-cat-outdoor-advertising/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 17:54:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Charles</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Outdoor]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.charlesneville.com/?p=682</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[EuroAWK have a fun campaign at the moment, mashing up fake ads to create amusing, attention grabbing posters like this.


Related posts:Another advertising blunder from Microsoft
Advertising Smarts



<b>Related posts:</b><ul><li><a href='http://www.charlesneville.com/2009/04/another-advertising-blunder-from-microsoft/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Another advertising blunder from Microsoft'>Another advertising blunder from Microsoft</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.charlesneville.com/2009/09/smart-car/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Advertising Smarts'>Advertising Smarts</a></li>
</ul>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.charlesneville.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/yourcat.jpg" rel="shadowbox[post-682];player=img;"><img class="size-medium wp-image-683 alignleft" title="Your Cat Will Love" src="http://www.charlesneville.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/yourcat-203x300.jpg" alt="click to enlarge" width="203" height="300" /></a>EuroAWK have a fun campaign at the moment, mashing up fake ads to create amusing, attention grabbing posters like this.</p>


<p><b>Related posts:</b><ul><li><a href='http://www.charlesneville.com/2009/04/another-advertising-blunder-from-microsoft/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Another advertising blunder from Microsoft'>Another advertising blunder from Microsoft</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.charlesneville.com/2009/09/smart-car/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Advertising Smarts'>Advertising Smarts</a></li>
</ul></p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/charlesneville/~4/wCDjmZdLPEo" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.charlesneville.com/2010/02/your-cat-outdoor-advertising/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.charlesneville.com/2010/02/your-cat-outdoor-advertising/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Why I’m buying an iPad</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/charlesneville/~3/5UsYjFjIIVI/</link>
		<comments>http://www.charlesneville.com/2010/01/why-im-buying-an-ipad/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 13:09:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Charles</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Personal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPad]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.charlesneville.com/?p=674</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve decided that I&#8217;m going to buy an iPad at the first opportunity I get, so here are my reasons:


I want it
It&#8217;s new
It&#8217;s interesting
It has an Apple logo on it (see 1 &#38; 2 above)
It&#8217;s either going to change the way we think about computers, or it&#8217;ll be a total flop, in which case in [...]


<b>Related posts:</b><ul><li><a href='http://www.charlesneville.com/2009/06/stuff-i-want-iphone-tripod-attachment/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Stuff I want: iPhone tripod attachment'>Stuff I want: iPhone tripod attachment</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.charlesneville.com/2009/10/free-to-paid/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: From free to paid'>From free to paid</a></li>
</ul>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="_mcePaste"><a href="http://www.apple.com/ipad"><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-675" title="iPad" src="http://www.charlesneville.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/hero_20100127-247x300.png" alt="" width="247" height="300" /></a>I&#8217;ve decided that I&#8217;m going to buy an <a href="http://www.apple.com/ipad/">iPad</a> at the first opportunity I get, so here are my reasons:</div>
<div id="_mcePaste">
<ul>
<li>I want it</li>
<li>It&#8217;s new</li>
<li>It&#8217;s interesting</li>
<li>It has an Apple logo on it (see 1 &amp; 2 above)</li>
<li>It&#8217;s either going to change the way we think about computers, or it&#8217;ll be a total flop, in which case in years to come it will be a collector&#8217;s item</li>
</ul>
</div>
<p><span id="more-674"></span></p>
<div id="_mcePaste">I think that&#8217;s a pretty good set of reasons and if you don&#8217;t, I don&#8217;t care &#8211; and here&#8217;s why, my final reason:</div>
<div id="_mcePaste">
<ul>
<li>Because spending time reading any more &#8216;iPad sucks&#8217; or &#8216;iPad is the second coming&#8217; blog posts and articles, and potentially responding in the comments, or getting drawn into discussions (arguments) about what the iPad is, what&#8217;s missing, whether those things will be present in iPad 2.0, and whether people should buy one, I&#8217;m going to spend that time working productively, earning the money to buy it with.</li>
</ul>
</div>
<div>So I&#8217;m getting off the fence, getting down to work, and buying an iPad when it comes out (probably the mid-range 32Gb 3G equipped version, in case you were wondering).</div>
<div id="_mcePaste">Now go make your own mind up.</div>
<div></div>
<div>UPDATE: just in case you&#8217;re wondering about whether I&#8217;m blindly ignoring &#8216;what&#8217;s missing from the iPad&#8217; &#8211; I&#8217;m not, I just don&#8217;t think those things are important.</div>
<div>Flash &#8211; when using my iPhone I don&#8217;t miss Flash. If I come across a site that is dumb enough to have an unskippable intro, I just leave. Web video uses Flash because Flash was in the right place at the right time. The YouTube app on my iPhone works just fine thanks, streaming H.264 video.</div>
<div>A camera &#8211; because video conferencing is SO important? I&#8217;m not going to use this thing to take pictures with even if it had a camera. I&#8217;ll use a camera. I will still be able to one-way video conference (Fring for iPhone does this now, with one-way Skype video). There might be a camera in the rev 2 of the iPad. That won&#8217;t be enough for me to upgrade as I don&#8217;t consider a camera all that important.</div>
<div>Multi-tasking &#8211; for the most part this is a pointless gripe. Background notifications work perfectly well for most things you&#8217;d think you need multi-tasking for. Some people raising this criticism seem to be so blinkered as to think you can&#8217;t listen to music while doing something else. You can. Furthermore, all this is based on iPhone OS 3.2, the version that the SDK is currently at. We&#8217;ll see iPhone OS 4.0 in the summer, which may or may not have multi-tasking, for devices with Apple&#8217;s custom designed chip, as used in the iPad.</div>


<p><b>Related posts:</b><ul><li><a href='http://www.charlesneville.com/2009/06/stuff-i-want-iphone-tripod-attachment/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Stuff I want: iPhone tripod attachment'>Stuff I want: iPhone tripod attachment</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.charlesneville.com/2009/10/free-to-paid/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: From free to paid'>From free to paid</a></li>
</ul></p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/charlesneville/~4/5UsYjFjIIVI" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.charlesneville.com/2010/01/why-im-buying-an-ipad/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.charlesneville.com/2010/01/why-im-buying-an-ipad/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Hello, Park 458</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/charlesneville/~3/cu4cIyMap6w/</link>
		<comments>http://www.charlesneville.com/2010/01/wasted-title-tags/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 10:06:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Charles</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Search Engine Optimisation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.charlesneville.com/?p=670</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Many years ago that&#8217;s how people used to answer the phone, confirming the number the caller had dialled. The reason for this? Phones were less personal and misdials were more common. Some people still do it, at home. Mostly it&#8217;s a waste of time, the percentage of misdialed calls is dropping as more people call [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-671" title="retro phone" src="http://www.charlesneville.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/3172116158_44882f49ce-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" />Many years ago that&#8217;s how people used to answer the phone, confirming the number the caller had dialled. The reason for this? Phones were less personal and misdials were more common. Some people still do it, at home. Mostly it&#8217;s a waste of time, the percentage of misdialed calls is dropping as more people call from a phone that confirms the number dialled. In any case people answering company phone lines don&#8217;t quote the number back, they state the name of their company.</p>
<p>You may wonder why I&#8217;m mentioning this. It&#8217;s because I&#8217;ve noticed a fair number of websites recently using content management systems set up with no thought whatsoever to the SEO value AND usability benefit of having a well crafted title tag. Repeating the domain name is a waste of time &#8211; it&#8217;s already in the location bar of the browser anyway. Imagine calling Hertz and the phone being answered by someone parroting the number you&#8217;d just dialled: &#8220;Hertz, 08455 19 15 36&#8243;, completely pointless.</p>
<p>Take a few moments to check through your site. Your title tags should be:</p>
<ol>
<li>Keyword rich</li>
<li>Non-repetitive</li>
<li>Written for humans, not used as a replacement for the meta keywords tag</li>
<li>Devoid of your domain name. Please.</li>
</ol>
<p><span id="more-670"></span></p>
<p>The site title/company name should in there, but put it at the end &#8211; ranking #1 for your company name is easy.</p>
<p>Image credit: <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/carlos_lorenzo/3172116158/">Carlos Lorenzo</a> via Creative Commons on Flickr</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/charlesneville/~4/cu4cIyMap6w" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.charlesneville.com/2010/01/wasted-title-tags/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.charlesneville.com/2010/01/wasted-title-tags/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Elementary Advertising</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/charlesneville/~3/awrgN75z970/</link>
		<comments>http://www.charlesneville.com/2010/01/elementary-advertising/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 17:02:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Charles</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sherlock Holmes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sherlog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.charlesneville.com/?p=665</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A Czech company takes advantage of the release of the Sherlock Holmes movie with a fun tie-in poster campaign.


<b>Related posts:</b><ul><li><a href='http://www.charlesneville.com/2009/09/smart-car/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Advertising Smarts'>Advertising Smarts</a></li>
</ul>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.charlesneville.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/DSC06642.jpg" rel="shadowbox[post-665];player=img;"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-667" title="Sherlock" src="http://www.charlesneville.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/DSC06642-197x300.jpg" alt="" width="197" height="300" /></a>Sometimes an opportunity comes along that&#8217;s just too good to pass up. This <a href="http://www.sherlog.cz">Czech car security company</a> put an active or passive device in your car that makes finding it much more likely (98% success rate, and they list the cars they&#8217;ve recovered, to prove it works). They&#8217;re called Sherlog and they&#8217;ve been running ads like this all over town, coinciding with the cinema release of the <a href="http://sherlock-holmes-movie.warnerbros.com/">Sherlock Holmes movie</a>. I&#8217;ve no idea as to the backstory here &#8211; whether Sherlog are paying for all the ad placement costs or splitting it, but it&#8217;s a fun tie-in. The slogans are &#8220;Nothing escapes them&#8221; and &#8220;Nothing escapes us&#8221; respectively. Well done Sherlog!</p>


<p><b>Related posts:</b><ul><li><a href='http://www.charlesneville.com/2009/09/smart-car/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Advertising Smarts'>Advertising Smarts</a></li>
</ul></p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/charlesneville/~4/awrgN75z970" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.charlesneville.com/2010/01/elementary-advertising/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.charlesneville.com/2010/01/elementary-advertising/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Nobody seeks out vague promises</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/charlesneville/~3/rIscFivuUk0/</link>
		<comments>http://www.charlesneville.com/2010/01/vague-promises/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 10:56:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Charles</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marketing Basics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Retail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Word of Mouth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[weasel words]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.charlesneville.com/?p=661</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As marketers we all love to promise the earth but you need to be able deliver on what you&#8217;re offering. If you need to use weasel words and internal jargon to qualify your promises, you&#8217;re doing it wrong.
When you see an advert for flatscreen TVs offering a &#8216;free Blu-Ray player with selected TVs&#8217; &#8211; what&#8217;s [...]


<b>Related posts:</b><ul><li><a href='http://www.charlesneville.com/2009/06/how-to-get-more-reviews/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: How to Get More Reviews'>How to Get More Reviews</a></li>
</ul>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/kjpmpix/4250171595/"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-662" title="up to 60% off" src="http://www.charlesneville.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/4250171595_d1ed667b4e-300x199.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="199" /></a>As marketers we all love to promise the earth but you need to be able deliver on what you&#8217;re offering. If you need to use <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weasel_word">weasel</a> <a href="http://home.olemiss.edu/~egjbp/comp/ad-claims.html">words</a> and internal jargon to qualify your promises, you&#8217;re doing it wrong.</p>
<p>When you see an advert for flatscreen TVs offering a &#8216;free Blu-Ray player with selected TVs&#8217; &#8211; what&#8217;s your thought process? Is it &#8216;ooh, I&#8217;m gonna get a free Blu-Ray player&#8217; or is it &#8216;I bet the one I want doesn&#8217;t come with a free Blu-Ray player&#8217;. How about a sale sign that offers &#8216;Up to 50% off&#8217;? I guess it depends on whether you&#8217;re a glass half-full or half-empty kind of person. Maybe you get a nice surprise or maybe you&#8217;re disappointed. The one thing that word &#8217;selected&#8217; doesn&#8217;t do is fill you with confidence because it immediately creates a doubt in your mind.</p>
<p>Customers don&#8217;t know what &#8217;selected&#8217; means in that context, they don&#8217;t know what a company&#8217;s &#8216;primary service areas&#8217; are. All they know is that the company wants their offer to sound good whilst leaving some wiggle room. Customers don&#8217;t care about a company&#8217;s ability to squirm out of providing something. They want what they&#8217;re promised.</p>
<p><strong>Under-promise, over-deliver</strong><br />
That&#8217;s what we should aim for. That&#8217;s what gets customers telling their friends about us. The opposite can make people talk about us for all the wrong reasons.</p>
<p><span id="more-661"></span></p>
<p>If you&#8217;d prefer to state up front everything people can expect from you as part of your service or offering, then go ahead, but don&#8217;t hide behind puffery and ambiguity. If there are limitations, don&#8217;t be afraid to state them &#8211; you&#8217;ll only be called on it later if you don&#8217;t.</p>
<p>Image credit: <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/kjpmpix/4250171595/">kjpm</a> via Creative Commons on Flickr</p>


<p><b>Related posts:</b><ul><li><a href='http://www.charlesneville.com/2009/06/how-to-get-more-reviews/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: How to Get More Reviews'>How to Get More Reviews</a></li>
</ul></p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/charlesneville/~4/rIscFivuUk0" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.charlesneville.com/2010/01/vague-promises/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.charlesneville.com/2010/01/vague-promises/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Domain name housekeeping</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/charlesneville/~3/V7yp_k0oaYk/</link>
		<comments>http://www.charlesneville.com/2010/01/domain-name-housekeeping/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 18:27:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Charles</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Search Engine Optimisation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.charlesneville.com/?p=651</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An often forgotten aspect of search engine optimisation is centred around various aspects of your domain name. For example Google&#8217;s search algorithm takes into account over 200 different factors, categorised as on-page and off-page. On-page is the content of your pages themselves &#8211; the visible text and the code. Off-page factors include things like external [...]


<b>Related posts:</b><ul><li><a href='http://www.charlesneville.com/2009/12/link-exchanges-dead-as-disco/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Link Exchanges &#8211; Dead as Disco'>Link Exchanges &#8211; Dead as Disco</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.charlesneville.com/2009/09/too-much-seo/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Is there such a thing as too much SEO?'>Is there such a thing as too much SEO?</a></li>
</ul>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/pewari/3387805180/"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-652" title="Henry Vacuum" src="http://www.charlesneville.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/3387805180_3c6ffc7d31-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a>An often forgotten aspect of search engine optimisation is centred around various aspects of your domain name. For example Google&#8217;s search algorithm takes into account over 200 different factors, categorised as on-page and off-page. On-page is the content of your pages themselves &#8211; the visible text and the code. Off-page factors include things like external links and a whole host of things you mostly have no control over.</p>
<p>There are however a number of simple &#8216;off-page&#8217; domain-related factors that you can control and that search engines consider when ranking sites:</p>
<ol>
<li><strong>Age of domain<br />
</strong>You can&#8217;t fake this, but you can buy up older names, sometimes it&#8217;s worth making an offer, if the domain you want is up for sale. If it has been registered for a few years, that may help you rank higher, even if it&#8217;s not currently in search indexes. Just do your due diligence first &#8211; check it doesn&#8217;t have a chequered past.</li>
<li><strong>Domain ownership details<br />
</strong>Many domain name registrars offer a premium service of domain name anonymity. Google and other search engines aren&#8217;t so keen on this. They figure you have something to hide. If you&#8217;re worried about privacy and don&#8217;t want to put your home address, you don&#8217;t have to &#8211; nobody&#8217;s going to be posting anything to that address (or at least nobody you want to hear from).</li>
<li><strong>Domain expiry</strong><br />
Most people don&#8217;t pay for things until they have to. So you wait till your domain name is up for renewal and renew then right? WRONG! A domain with less than a year remaining till expiry is considered as a potential drop-out. Most domain registrars offer multi-year discounts and you don&#8217;t have to wait till your name is due for renewal to secure it for 3, 4 or more years more. At around $10 a year for a .com it&#8217;s a false economy to hold off on renewing your name till you start getting email reminders.</li>
</ol>
<p>Now go get your domain in order!</p>
<p><span id="more-651"></span></p>
<p>Image credit: <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/pewari/3387805180/">Pewari Naan</a> on Flickr</p>


<p><b>Related posts:</b><ul><li><a href='http://www.charlesneville.com/2009/12/link-exchanges-dead-as-disco/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Link Exchanges &#8211; Dead as Disco'>Link Exchanges &#8211; Dead as Disco</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.charlesneville.com/2009/09/too-much-seo/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Is there such a thing as too much SEO?'>Is there such a thing as too much SEO?</a></li>
</ul></p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/charlesneville/~4/V7yp_k0oaYk" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.charlesneville.com/2010/01/domain-name-housekeeping/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.charlesneville.com/2010/01/domain-name-housekeeping/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Tighten up your PPC strategy</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/charlesneville/~3/MXQqrdgDl-k/</link>
		<comments>http://www.charlesneville.com/2010/01/ppc-strategy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 11:02:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Charles</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adwords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Landing Pages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PPC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.charlesneville.com/?p=646</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Many small businesses love Google&#8217;s self-serve Adwords programme. Just sign up, create an ad, choose some keywords or let Google choose them for you, get traffic, pay the invoice.
Not so fast!
That&#8217;s all nice and simple but there are a few things you could be doing to make sure you&#8217;re getting the maximum juice from the [...]


<b>Related posts:</b><ul><li><a href='http://www.charlesneville.com/2009/09/paid-search-responsibility/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Is paid search the height of responsibility?'>Is paid search the height of responsibility?</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.charlesneville.com/2009/09/how-to-let-people-really-opt-out-of-your-facebook-ads/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: How to let people really opt out of your Facebook Ads'>How to let people really opt out of your Facebook Ads</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.charlesneville.com/2009/04/local-listings-for-local-people/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Local listings for local people'>Local listings for local people</a></li>
</ul>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/vegaseddie/3309226107/"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-647" title="horse race" src="http://www.charlesneville.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/3309226107_8af3254041-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a>Many small businesses love Google&#8217;s self-serve Adwords programme. Just sign up, create an ad, choose some keywords or let Google choose them for you, get traffic, pay the invoice.</p>
<p><strong>Not so fast!</strong><br />
That&#8217;s all nice and simple but there are a few things you could be doing to make sure you&#8217;re getting the maximum juice from the squeeze.</p>
<p><strong>Google is your friend. Sort of.</strong><br />
Google wants you to get some traffic, Google even provide you with tools to measure that traffic optimally. They even push you to do the most you can with the traffic you&#8217;re paying for, but the last thing Google are going to do is voluntarily reduce the amount of revenue they make.</p>
<p><strong>It&#8217;s all about the conversions</strong><br />
If you&#8217;re not paying attention to the conversions (whether that is orders or leads) that you get from your Adwords spend, you need to, right now. You can track things internally if you like &#8211; assuming your content management system&#8217;s lead forms or your e-commerce platform show you all the ways someone got to your site (for extra credit, not just last-click tracking too). If that&#8217;s not possible, Adwords provides conversion tracking for you. You set up a conversion, add a bit of javascript to the conversion page (final page of checkout or contact form sent page) and you&#8217;re done. Conversions will be tracked right down to the campaign, ad group, ad variation and keyword that brought you the sale or lead. Once you know what&#8217;s working, do more of that, and less of the keywords and ad variations that are bleeding you dry.</p>
<p><span id="more-646"></span></p>
<p><strong>Coming in to land</strong><br />
Landing Pages are REALLY important. Seriously, so important that I&#8217;m going to say it again. REALLY IMPORTANT. Got it? Good, let&#8217;s move on.</p>
<p>A landing page is, very simply, the page that the user arrives at immediately after clicking on your Adwords ad. Your ad is a highly targeted ad for blue widgets. Do you bring the user to&#8230;</p>
<ol>
<li>your home page</li>
<li>the contact us page</li>
<li>a page about blue widgets, with a &#8216;buy blue widgets now&#8217; button and a &#8216;contact us if you want to know anything more about blue widgets&#8217; button</li>
</ol>
<p><strong>Is it 3?</strong><br />
Well done. Gold star. Bringing the user to anywhere that creates a disconnect between what they searched on and what is on the page is a bad idea for two reasons.<br />
1) Google checks the quality of your landing page &#8211; that thing it does with the animated abacus when you enter your destination URL? It&#8217;s checking two things &#8211; one, that your destination URL exists and two &#8211; what&#8217;s on it. It also re-checks periodically in case you&#8217;ve changed it. Google uses the content of your landing page, and the behaviour of people who have clicked on your ad to determine a quality score. A higher quality score equals a lower cost per click.<br />
2) Users don&#8217;t like having to work out where to go to find the information you were promising them. You have mere seconds to impress a visitor.</p>
<p><strong>Apple and Pears</strong><br />
Imagine you&#8217;re at a market. You hear a stallholder shouting &#8216;lovely golden delicious apples, get &#8216;em here, two euros a kilo&#8217;. You&#8217;re shopping for apples anyway so you go over to his stall, except he&#8217;s gone, and you can&#8217;t see the apples. Do you stick around, or go to another seller? Now why would you want to do exactly that to someone on the web?</p>
<p>Sure, it takes time, and sometimes money, to craft landing pages for every ad you want to run on Adwords but if you don&#8217;t do everything you can to get every click to convert, you&#8217;re wasting your money, and you end up chalking your Adwords spend down as some kind of Google Tax, where it&#8217;s your way of paying them for all that organic traffic they bring you.</p>
<p>For some quality tips on landing page design, <a href="http://www.seomoz.org/blog/lets-talk-landing-pages">read this from SEOmoz</a>. If you&#8217;re having problems optimising your pay-per-click strategy, <a href="/contact/">get in touch</a> and I&#8217;ll let you know how I can help.</p>
<p>Image Credit: <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/vegaseddie/3309226107/">Paolo Camera via Creative Commons on Flickr</a></p>


<p><b>Related posts:</b><ul><li><a href='http://www.charlesneville.com/2009/09/paid-search-responsibility/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Is paid search the height of responsibility?'>Is paid search the height of responsibility?</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.charlesneville.com/2009/09/how-to-let-people-really-opt-out-of-your-facebook-ads/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: How to let people really opt out of your Facebook Ads'>How to let people really opt out of your Facebook Ads</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.charlesneville.com/2009/04/local-listings-for-local-people/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Local listings for local people'>Local listings for local people</a></li>
</ul></p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/charlesneville/~4/MXQqrdgDl-k" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.charlesneville.com/2010/01/ppc-strategy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.charlesneville.com/2010/01/ppc-strategy/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Banding Together</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/charlesneville/~3/zo3ih2eAC3c/</link>
		<comments>http://www.charlesneville.com/2010/01/banding-together/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 15:40:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Charles</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Local]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marketing Basics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Retail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Competition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Frenemies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Location]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prague]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.charlesneville.com/?p=640</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is your local retail business going well? Some of your (not &#8216;really competing&#8217;) neighbours doing worse?
I wrote a piece last year about why you might want to help out those who you might consider competitors. I&#8217;ve just seen first hand what can happen when a company&#8217;s neighbour goes out of business: a much more serious [...]


<b>Related posts:</b><ul><li><a href='http://www.charlesneville.com/2009/03/loyalty-cards-how-many-is-too-many/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Loyalty Cards &#8211; How Many is Too Many?'>Loyalty Cards &#8211; How Many is Too Many?</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.charlesneville.com/2010/03/reward-enthusiasm/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Reward and encourage enthusiasm, not just long service'>Reward and encourage enthusiasm, not just long service</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.charlesneville.com/2009/04/local-listings-for-local-people/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Local listings for local people'>Local listings for local people</a></li>
</ul>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-641" title="tackling the competition" src="http://www.charlesneville.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/1596157521_a4f300f1cd-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" />Is your local retail business going well? Some of your (not &#8216;really competing&#8217;) neighbours doing worse?</p>
<p>I wrote a piece last year about why you might want to help out <a href="http://www.charlesneville.com/2009/04/helping-out-your-competition/">those who you might consider competitors</a>. I&#8217;ve just seen first hand what can happen when a company&#8217;s neighbour goes out of business: a much more serious competitor can move in.</p>
<p>My local sandwich shop, a small independently owned business has been serving baguettes, salads and paninis for over 5 years. Later this month a sandwich-shop chain is opening up in place of a cafe, just three doors away. They should have them beaten on price, unless the new shop gets aggressive and goes after their loyal customer base of office workers from around the area. As it stands they&#8217;ll attract business just on the basis of curiosity.</p>
<p>Now is the time for the little guy to raise their game, whether they broaden the menu, encourage loyalty (the chain already has a loyalty discount card) and raise their service level: offer delivery, take pre-orders &#8211; all the things the chain isn&#8217;t willing to do.</p>
<p><span id="more-640"></span></p>
<p>If that situation sounds familiar to you, now might be a good time to reach out to them and work on some co-marketing efforts &#8211; banding together to ward off a bigger threat.</p>
<p>Image credit: <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/chiceaux/1596157521/">Chiceaux</a> via Creative Commons on Flickr</p>


<p><b>Related posts:</b><ul><li><a href='http://www.charlesneville.com/2009/03/loyalty-cards-how-many-is-too-many/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Loyalty Cards &#8211; How Many is Too Many?'>Loyalty Cards &#8211; How Many is Too Many?</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.charlesneville.com/2010/03/reward-enthusiasm/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Reward and encourage enthusiasm, not just long service'>Reward and encourage enthusiasm, not just long service</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.charlesneville.com/2009/04/local-listings-for-local-people/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Local listings for local people'>Local listings for local people</a></li>
</ul></p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/charlesneville/~4/zo3ih2eAC3c" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.charlesneville.com/2010/01/banding-together/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.charlesneville.com/2010/01/banding-together/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Service with a Snarl</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/charlesneville/~3/i7gxrp1Ij6c/</link>
		<comments>http://www.charlesneville.com/2009/12/service-with-a-snarl/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Dec 2009 11:45:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Charles</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Marketing Basics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Customer Service]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.charlesneville.com/?p=636</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Having just experienced a truly awful customer service experience (not traumatic or damaging and I won&#8217;t bore you with it) I was prompted to write this post. What was awful about it is that it exposed just how customer hostile this particular supermarket chain&#8217;s processes are.
The customer is always right
Even when they&#8217;re not. This has [...]


<b>Related posts:</b><ul><li><a href='http://www.charlesneville.com/2010/03/reward-enthusiasm/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Reward and encourage enthusiasm, not just long service'>Reward and encourage enthusiasm, not just long service</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.charlesneville.com/2009/05/remarketing-scary-or-good-customer-service/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Remarketing &#8211; scary or good customer service?'>Remarketing &#8211; scary or good customer service?</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.charlesneville.com/2009/11/lifetime-value-caveat-vendor/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Lifetime Value, Caveat Vendor'>Lifetime Value, Caveat Vendor</a></li>
</ul>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.charlesneville.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/2239711145_bcd3d2e0d6.jpg" rel="shadowbox[post-636];player=img;"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-637" title="snarling tiger" src="http://www.charlesneville.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/2239711145_bcd3d2e0d6-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a>Having just experienced a truly awful customer service experience (not traumatic or damaging and I won&#8217;t bore you with it) I was prompted to write this post. What was awful about it is that it exposed just how customer hostile this particular supermarket chain&#8217;s processes are.</p>
<h3>The customer is always right</h3>
<p>Even when they&#8217;re not. This has been done to death. You never win an argument with a customer. If you win the argument you&#8217;re likely to lose the customer. Of course there are times when you might actively seek to end a relationship with a customer, but there are subtle ways to do it and wantonly destructive customer service is not one of them.</p>
<h3>Never ask a customer to do something you wouldn&#8217;t do yourself</h3>
<p><span id="more-636"></span></p>
<p>Ask yourself if your company&#8217;s customer service polices are designed for the organisation&#8217;s convenience, not the customer&#8217;s. Are they designed to stave off enquiries rather than make customers happy?</p>
<h3>The only timeframe that counts is the customer&#8217;s</h3>
<p>Your internal metrics might be based on things like average time to respond (not necessarily solve) to customer queries. That&#8217;s important, but it&#8217;s everything. If you&#8217;re doing things in the background like tracing a late delivery for a customer, keeping them in the loop makes sense &#8211; at least they don&#8217;t feel ignored, but until they have the product in their hand there is still a problem in ther mind.</p>
<h3>The only outcome that matters is that the customer is satisfied</h3>
<p>Customers make decisions about whether to recommend a company and whether to do repeat business with them based on the level of service they receive. If anything goes wrong that counts even more. Handling complaints quickly and to the customer&#8217;s satisfaction should be your primary aim. You can do as many lifetime value and acquisition cost calculations as you like, there&#8217;s no way to know just how much damage an unhappy customer can cause you.</p>
<h3>Customer Service is Marketing</h3>
<p>In many companies, the customer services department is still seen purely as a cost centre, where the aim is to get the customer out of your hair, as quickly as possible. If that sounds like your company, and you&#8217;re in the marketing department you need to take control of the situation and demand more involvement. Every touchpoint with a customer is an opportunity to strengthen or weaken the relationship. Do you even know what your CS frontline staff are saying to your hard-won customers? Marketers need to make sure that the whole customer experience is the best it can be.</p>
<p>Image credit: <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/80375783@N00/2239711145/">bthomso</a> via Creative Commons on Flickr</p>


<p><b>Related posts:</b><ul><li><a href='http://www.charlesneville.com/2010/03/reward-enthusiasm/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Reward and encourage enthusiasm, not just long service'>Reward and encourage enthusiasm, not just long service</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.charlesneville.com/2009/05/remarketing-scary-or-good-customer-service/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Remarketing &#8211; scary or good customer service?'>Remarketing &#8211; scary or good customer service?</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.charlesneville.com/2009/11/lifetime-value-caveat-vendor/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Lifetime Value, Caveat Vendor'>Lifetime Value, Caveat Vendor</a></li>
</ul></p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/charlesneville/~4/i7gxrp1Ij6c" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.charlesneville.com/2009/12/service-with-a-snarl/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.charlesneville.com/2009/12/service-with-a-snarl/</feedburner:origLink></item>
	</channel>
</rss>
