<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" version="2.0">

<channel>
	<title>Jiří {x2} Činčura</title>
	
	<link>http://blog.cincura.net</link>
	<description>Taking something that can't be done, and then doing it.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 04:56:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/blog_cincura_net" /><feedburner:info xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" uri="blog_cincura_net" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><item>
		<title>Kindle 4 Touch firmware 5.1.0</title>
		<link>http://blog.cincura.net/232835-kindle-4-touch-firmware-5-1-0/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.cincura.net/232835-kindle-4-touch-firmware-5-1-0/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 04:55:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cincura.net</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[.*]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amazon Kindle]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cincura.net/?p=232835</guid>
		
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[When I was satisfied with it. But there were few pieces I was missing and previous versions have them. But with firmware 5.1.0 it&#8217;s running on full steam back again. What I like (and I was missing) in particular is landscape mode and highlighting across pages. The new homescreen layout is nice too. Landscape mode [...]]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.cincura.net/232835-kindle-4-touch-firmware-5-1-0/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NuoDB – starting with “NewSQL” database</title>
		<link>http://blog.cincura.net/232827-nuodb-starting-with-newsql-database/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.cincura.net/232827-nuodb-starting-with-newsql-database/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2012 08:00:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cincura.net</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[.*]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Databases in general]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NewSQL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NoSQL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NuoDB]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cincura.net/?p=232827</guid>
		
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[NoSQL is everywhere around us. And there&#8217;s a new (well, it&#8217;s here for a while, but still in beta stages of development) kind, it&#8217;s called NuoDB. To be precise, NuoDB positions itself as NewSQL. It claims to be 100% SQL, 100% ACID and 100% elastically scalable. I was following it since early stages (original name [...]]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.cincura.net/232827-nuodb-starting-with-newsql-database/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Server unplugged</title>
		<link>http://blog.cincura.net/232820-server-unplugged/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.cincura.net/232820-server-unplugged/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2012 18:14:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cincura.net</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[.*]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cincura.net/?p=232820</guid>
		
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[One of my first servers I used for real world applications is now unplugged. Weird feeling. It was Linux box running Slackware 10.2.0 (yeah, old). For a while it was my main mail (Postfix, Dovecot) and antispam (SpamAssassin) server. I had Firebird there as well as Apache/httpd, PHP, Subversion and Mono. And all the standard [...]]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.cincura.net/232820-server-unplugged/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Compare NULLs in database as in C# in Entity Framework</title>
		<link>http://blog.cincura.net/232814-compare-nulls-in-database-as-in-c-in-entity-framework/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.cincura.net/232814-compare-nulls-in-database-as-in-c-in-entity-framework/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2012 10:10:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cincura.net</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[.*]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[C#]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Databases in general]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entity Framework]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entity SQL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LINQ]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cincura.net/?p=232814</guid>
		
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Roughly two years ago I blogged about . But Entity Framework 5 (in .NET 4.5) () comes with handy switch. It&#8217;s UseCSharpNullComparisonBehavior. What this basically does is ensure when you compare nullable fields to be handled like in C#, aka null == null and not like in SQL where NULL compared to anything is NULL [...]]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.cincura.net/232814-compare-nulls-in-database-as-in-c-in-entity-framework/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ID or Id?</title>
		<link>http://blog.cincura.net/232797-id-or-id/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.cincura.net/232797-id-or-id/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 13:04:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cincura.net</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[.*]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[.NET]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[C#]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Programming in general]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cincura.net/?p=232797</guid>
		
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Looks like there are two groups of developers. One writing ID and one writing Id. I'm in the first one, and I'm even not 100% sure why (except because my feelings are saying me, it's "more" correct). But it looks like there's no conclusion. More and more I see the other option being used often [...]]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.cincura.net/232797-id-or-id/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Count for System.Collections.Concurrent.ConcurrentStack&lt;T&gt;</title>
		<link>http://blog.cincura.net/232802-count-for-system-collections-concurrent-concurrentstack/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.cincura.net/232802-count-for-system-collections-concurrent-concurrentstack/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2012 17:36:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cincura.net</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[.*]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[.NET]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Best practice or not?]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Multithreading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parallelism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cincura.net/?p=232802</guid>
		
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Collections in System.Collections.Concurrent namespace are optimized for access from more (basically) threads. That means no stupid &#8220;one-lock-for-everything&#8221; approach. Actually these are lock free. It&#8217;s good for performance, but also, if used foolhardily, the performance penalty can be too big. One example can be the ConcurrentStack&#60;T&#62; class. As with a lot of collections, this stack also [...]]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.cincura.net/232802-count-for-system-collections-concurrent-concurrentstack/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Generating POCO and Code First mapping from database</title>
		<link>http://blog.cincura.net/232792-generating-poco-and-code-first-mapping-from-database/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.cincura.net/232792-generating-poco-and-code-first-mapping-from-database/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2012 12:23:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cincura.net</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[.*]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entity Framework]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Firebird]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cincura.net/?p=232792</guid>
		
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[I like POCOs and Code First. Simply because that way I have everything under my control. I don&#8217;t mean just the code itself, but also the formatting, ordering of static/public/private/&#8230; properties etc. Same with mapping. Everything is described by me. No magic conventions. But there was one problem. If you already had a database (even [...]]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.cincura.net/232792-generating-poco-and-code-first-mapping-from-database/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Problem “Could not load file or assembly ‘&lt;assembly&gt;’ or one of its dependencies. The given assembly name or codebase was invalid. (Exception from HRESULT: 0×80131047)” when using Entity Framework’s migrate.exe</title>
		<link>http://blog.cincura.net/232804-problem-could-not-load-file-or-assembly-assembly-or-one-of-its-dependencies-the-given-assembly-name-or-codebase-was-invalid-exception-from-hresult-0x80131047-when-using-entity-fra/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.cincura.net/232804-problem-could-not-load-file-or-assembly-assembly-or-one-of-its-dependencies-the-given-assembly-name-or-codebase-was-invalid-exception-from-hresult-0x80131047-when-using-entity-fra/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2012 09:59:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cincura.net</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[.*]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entity Framework]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cincura.net/?p=232804</guid>
		
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[When you use migrate.exe from Entity Framework&#8216;s Migrations (in time of writing 4.3.1) you might get the error saying: Could not load file or assembly &#8216;&#60;assembly&#62;&#8217; or one of its dependencies. The given assembly name or codebase was invalid. (Exception from HRESULT: 0&#215;80131047) That&#8217;s nice, but nothing special, right? The reason is simple and as [...]]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.cincura.net/232804-problem-could-not-load-file-or-assembly-assembly-or-one-of-its-dependencies-the-given-assembly-name-or-codebase-was-invalid-exception-from-hresult-0x80131047-when-using-entity-fra/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Přednáška “Entity Framework 4.3 – migrace”</title>
		<link>http://blog.cincura.net/232756-prednaska-entity-framework-4-3-migrace/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.cincura.net/232756-prednaska-entity-framework-4-3-migrace/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 10:00:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cincura.net</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[.*]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Announcements & Invitations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entity Framework]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Presentations & Speaking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cincura.net/?p=232756</guid>
		
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Není tomu tak dávno, co jsem slyšel od Entity Framework týmu, že, v té době ještě pouze nad EDMX, nic jako porovnávání a změny struktury databáze oproti modelu nejsou a nebudou. A hle, o několik let později je tu máme. Pokrok nezastavíš. Entity Framework 4.3 obsahuje velkou novinku v podobě ručních (nebo automatických) migrací struktury [...]]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.cincura.net/232756-prednaska-entity-framework-4-3-migrace/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Executing method in intervals – good and bad approaches</title>
		<link>http://blog.cincura.net/232782-executing-method-in-intervals-good-and-bad-approaches/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.cincura.net/232782-executing-method-in-intervals-good-and-bad-approaches/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2012 15:43:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cincura.net</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[.*]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[.NET]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Best practice or not?]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Multithreading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parallelism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Programming in general]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reactive Extensions (Rx)]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cincura.net/?p=232782</guid>
		
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[In last few days I&#8217;ve seen couple of pieces of code with &#8220;executing method every x seconds&#8221;. And a lot of bad. Not buggy, but superfluously expensive. I&#8217;m also here adding a simple loop to run just 10 times. The first bad one is simply using Thread and Sleep method. void BadOne1() { Thread t [...]]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.cincura.net/232782-executing-method-in-intervals-good-and-bad-approaches/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Differences between “recreate procedure/…” and “create or alter procedure/…”</title>
		<link>http://blog.cincura.net/232778-differences-between-recreate-procedure-and-create-or-alter-procedure/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.cincura.net/232778-differences-between-recreate-procedure-and-create-or-alter-procedure/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2012 14:17:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cincura.net</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[.*]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Firebird]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SQL]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cincura.net/?p=232778</guid>
		
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[I was recently in a talk related to Firebird and I found, that people are not aware of these two constructs. Either they don&#8217;t know both or don&#8217;t know they differ. These statements are doing similar stuff, but the evil is in details. So what&#8217;s the big deal? Both are kind of &#8220;updating&#8221; the procedure [...]]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.cincura.net/232778-differences-between-recreate-procedure-and-create-or-alter-procedure/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gopas TechEd 2012</title>
		<link>http://blog.cincura.net/232772-gopas-teched-2012/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.cincura.net/232772-gopas-teched-2012/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2012 10:00:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cincura.net</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[.*]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Announcements & Invitations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Presentations & Speaking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cincura.net/?p=232772</guid>
		
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[I letos se koná Gopas TechEd a i letos si budete moci přijít prohlédnout jednoho podivného vývojáře. Pokud čtete můj blog alespoň více než jednou ročně, víte co mě zajímá. Takže přednášky nebudou o ničem nečekaném. Zjednodušeně řečeno půjde o Entity Frameworku a async/await oboje o novinkách v .NET 4.5, C# 5 a Visual Studio [...]]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.cincura.net/232772-gopas-teched-2012/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Shorter Firebird queries from Entity Framework</title>
		<link>http://blog.cincura.net/232770-shorter-firebird-queries-from-entity-framework/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.cincura.net/232770-shorter-firebird-queries-from-entity-framework/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2012 15:58:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cincura.net</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[.*]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entity Framework]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entity SQL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Firebird]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LINQ]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cincura.net/?p=232770</guid>
		
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Yesterday I and there&#8217;s one feature I&#8217;d like to blog about. As you might know Firebird has a pretty old limitation on &#8220;size&#8221; of query. It&#8217;s both the string itself, but also the column datatypes and parameters used. No need to dive to details, because I&#8217;ll only talk about the first item. When you&#8217;re using [...]]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.cincura.net/232770-shorter-firebird-queries-from-entity-framework/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ADO.NET provider for Firebird 2.7.5 released</title>
		<link>http://blog.cincura.net/232764-ado-net-provider-for-firebird-2-7-5-released/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.cincura.net/232764-ado-net-provider-for-firebird-2-7-5-released/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2012 13:20:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cincura.net</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[.*]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[.NET]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Announcements & Invitations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Databases in general]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entity Framework]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entity SQL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Firebird]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LINQ]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cincura.net/?p=232764</guid>
		
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[The 2.7.5 version of ADO.NET provider for Firebird is ready for download. This version contains mainly bug fixes (some pretty nasty) resulting in stability improvements. You can check the tracker for more details about this release and of course download it from website or NuGet. Enjoy!]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.cincura.net/232764-ado-net-provider-for-firebird-2-7-5-released/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Include with filtering or limiting</title>
		<link>http://blog.cincura.net/232741-include-with-filtering-or-limiting/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.cincura.net/232741-include-with-filtering-or-limiting/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 08:22:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cincura.net</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[.*]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entity Framework]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Expressions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LINQ]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cincura.net/?p=232741</guid>
		
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Almost four years ago I wrote an article . You might want to do same stuff with Include method. It&#8217;s not directly supported in this method but you can do it with anonymous object easily. There&#8217;s only one catch, it&#8217;s the anonymous object. That means, if you need the entities you need to manually select [...]]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.cincura.net/232741-include-with-filtering-or-limiting/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mapping private/protected/… properties in Entity Framework 4.x Code First</title>
		<link>http://blog.cincura.net/232731-mapping-private-protected-properties-in-entity-framework-4-x-code-first/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.cincura.net/232731-mapping-private-protected-properties-in-entity-framework-4-x-code-first/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 13:07:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cincura.net</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[.*]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entity Framework]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cincura.net/?p=232731</guid>
		
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[More than a year ago I was blogging about for the time being. Well it a long time and a lot of changed. The code there isn&#8217;t absolutely up to date with current Entity Framework 4.3. Although you can go raw and create the expression tree from i.e. string yourself (Mono.Linq.Expressions can be quite handy) [...]]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.cincura.net/232731-mapping-private-protected-properties-in-entity-framework-4-x-code-first/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>log4net dependencies problem – solved</title>
		<link>http://blog.cincura.net/232722-log4net-dependencies-problem-solved/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.cincura.net/232722-log4net-dependencies-problem-solved/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 15:50:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cincura.net</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[.*]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Logging and tracing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NuGet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cincura.net/?p=232722</guid>
		
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[OK, following log4net&#8217;s versioning scheme wasn&#8217;t a good idea. In version 1.2.11 the new keys were used and I used this as a fresh start. I didn&#8217;t realized that thanks to semantic versioning everybody will be updated to latest version and dependencies will be broken. My fault. If you read my there&#8217;s a solution with [...]]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.cincura.net/232722-log4net-dependencies-problem-solved/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Try catch return bool</title>
		<link>http://blog.cincura.net/232693-try-catch-return-bool/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.cincura.net/232693-try-catch-return-bool/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 11:41:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cincura.net</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[.*]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[.NET]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[C#]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cincura.net/?p=232693</guid>
		
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[I was recently writing a lot of method that talked to 3rd party API. And after small refactoring a lot of methods was like try to call some method, if it throws exception return false, if not return true. And I was wondering, what&#8217;s the best (in terms of code being generated, speed, efficiency but [...]]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.cincura.net/232693-try-catch-return-bool/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>InfoQ interview with me</title>
		<link>http://blog.cincura.net/232715-infoq-interview-with-me/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.cincura.net/232715-infoq-interview-with-me/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 08:50:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cincura.net</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[.*]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[.NET]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Databases in general]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entity Framework]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Firebird]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cincura.net/?p=232715</guid>
		
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[I was recently interviewed for InfoQ article &#8211; Q&#038;A with Jiri Cincura of the Firebird Database Project. We touched Firebird, ADO.NET, O/RMs, Entity Framework etc. If you have any questions, feel free to ask.]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.cincura.net/232715-infoq-interview-with-me/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Off-site initial upload for Synology Amazon S3 backup</title>
		<link>http://blog.cincura.net/232682-off-site-initial-upload-for-synology-amazon-s3-backup/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.cincura.net/232682-off-site-initial-upload-for-synology-amazon-s3-backup/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 08:33:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cincura.net</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[.*]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amazon AWS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cloud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Network Attached Storage (NAS)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Storage & Backup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Synology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cincura.net/?p=232682</guid>
		
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[I recently started thinking about backing up also &#8220;less&#8221; [1] important data to Amazon S3 from my Synology NAS, which is my primary backup location. The problem was, that the amount was about 150GB. Far more than I can upload through my home connection in reasonable time. It would take weeks. When I first started [...]]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.cincura.net/232682-off-site-initial-upload-for-synology-amazon-s3-backup/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

