The new guidance clarifies that communications between federal agency officials and outside persons, including federally registered lobbyists, concerning general logistical questions about Recovery Act funding or implementation are unrestricted. That is, requests for a meeting, inquiries concerning the status of an action, inquiries concerning the deadlines or logistics of Recovery Act funding opportunities or other similar administrative requests that do not involve advocacy concerning Recovery Act policy or a particular project or application for funding under the Recovery Act are not subject to restriction and need not be publicly disclosed.
Click here to read the full alert.
]]>
Click here to read the full alert.
]]>Click here to read the full alert.
]]>While the Administration’s emphasis continues to be on increased disclosure of lobbyist communications regarding Recovery Act issues, the latest guidance clarifies that the prohibition on oral communications only applies during a specific time period and applies to all communications, not just those made by federally registered lobbyists. As has been the case since the May 2009 announcement by the White House, lobbyists may attend and participate in phone calls and meetings with federal officials so long as the communications are not within the covered period.
Click here to read the full alert.
]]>Click here to read the full alert.
]]>The current disclosure regime will remain in place until it is “superseded in due course by broader permanent disclosure measures—preferably agreed on the widest possible international basis—and/or be revoked.” The FSA has emphasized that it does not intend to keep the regime permanently.
Note: As previously set out in the January alert, the prohibition on short selling of stocks in UK financial sector companies has ended.
Further information
]]>Click here to read the full alert.
Click here to read the full alert.
]]>President Obama issued a memorandum on March 20, 2009 prohibiting registered lobbyists from having oral communications with government officials about specific Recovery Act projects or applications and requiring that government officials only consider the views of registered lobbyists on such issues if the views were submitted in writing. The memorandum also required that oral discussions of general policy matters regarding the Recovery Act made by registered lobbyists be publicly disclosed. (Please click here to read our alert on the March 20 memorandum.)
Read the full alert here.
]]>This post can also be found at Akin Gump’s blog of labor issues, the Washington Labor and Employment Wire.
On May 29, 2009, the Wage and Hour Division (WHD) released a memorandum to all federal agencies and the District of Columbia regarding federal and federally-assisted construction work funded in whole or in part by the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA). Currently, the Davis-Bacon Act requires that each contract over $2,000 for the construction, alteration, or repair of public buildings or public works to which the United States or the District of Columbia is a party must include a provision stating the minimum wages laborers and mechanics are paid. The Secretary of Labor determines the prevailing wages for the corresponding classes of laborers and mechanics employed on projects.
Section 1606 of the ARRA indicates that the Davis-Bacon prevailing wage requirement broadly applies to ARRA-funded construction projects. Projects receiving such funding must follow the requirements located in the DOL regulations at 29 C.F.R. Parts 1, 3 and 5. This provision explicitly overrides any limitation to Davis-Bacon coverage contained in other Davis-Bacon related Acts. Thus, even if a construction project receives funding from multiple statutes, the ARRA prevailing wage requirement governs if the project receives ARRA funding.
Section 1606 of the ARRA does not apply to the following contracts: (1) tribal contracts with the Bureau of Indian Affairs involving repair and restoration of roads, school improvements, repairs and replacement construction, and detention center maintenance; (2) tribal contracts with the Department of Health and Human Services, Indian Health Services involving Indian health facilities construction projects; and (3) contracts receiving project-based rental assistance funding from the Department of Housing and Urban Development.
The WHD provides additional information for construction projects receiving ARRA funding on its website.
]]>