<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>AdExchanger</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.adexchanger.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.adexchanger.com/</link>
	<description>News and Views on Data-Driven Digital Advertising and Marketing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 18:03:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.2</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Peacock Hits Profitability As Comcast Prepares To Spin Off NBCU</title>
		<link>https://www.adexchanger.com/tv/peacock-hits-profitability-as-comcast-prepares-to-spin-off-nbcu/</link>
					<comments>https://www.adexchanger.com/tv/peacock-hits-profitability-as-comcast-prepares-to-spin-off-nbcu/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[<img src="https://www.adexchanger.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/2303-120x120.jpg"
     alt="Photo of Alyssa Boyle"
     width="60"
     height="60"
     class="ai-author-image ai-author-image--circle ai-author-image--inline rounded-circle shadow-offset"
     loading="lazy">
 Alyssa Boyle]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 16:19:02 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[CTV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[streaming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brian Roberts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Comcast Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Comcast Q2 2026]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Comcast Q2 earnings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jason Armstrong]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Cavanagh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peacock ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peacock profitability]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.adexchanger.com/?p=464641</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Peacock hit what Comcast Co-CEO Mike Cavanagh called “meaningful profitability” for the first time in Q2, just as Comcast decided to let it leave the nest. </p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.adexchanger.com/tv/peacock-hits-profitability-as-comcast-prepares-to-spin-off-nbcu/" data-wpel-link="internal">Peacock Hits Profitability As Comcast Prepares To Spin Off NBCU</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.adexchanger.com" data-wpel-link="internal">AdExchanger</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.adexchanger.com/tv/peacock-hits-profitability-as-comcast-prepares-to-spin-off-nbcu/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Programmatic Platforms Champion Transparency, But Not If It Means Giving Activists Access</title>
		<link>https://www.adexchanger.com/programmatic/programmatic-platforms-champion-transparency-but-not-if-it-means-giving-activists-access/</link>
					<comments>https://www.adexchanger.com/programmatic/programmatic-platforms-champion-transparency-but-not-if-it-means-giving-activists-access/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[<img src="https://www.adexchanger.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/2304-120x120.jpg"
     alt="Photo of Anthony Vargas"
     width="60"
     height="60"
     class="ai-author-image ai-author-image--circle ai-author-image--inline rounded-circle shadow-offset"
     loading="lazy">
 Anthony Vargas]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 15:01:39 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Programmatic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising transparency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI search ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andrea Tortella]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arielle Garcia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Check My Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DSPs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Demand Gen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Performance Max]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iesha White]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thrad]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.adexchanger.com/?p=464632</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>DSPs want to vet buyers before letting them into their platforms. No one wants to serve ads from advertisers they don’t trust. But what happens when a DSP is worried about a buyer digging too deeply into its supply chain? Apparently, that’s reason enough not to onboard them – which is odd, given how loudly [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.adexchanger.com/programmatic/programmatic-platforms-champion-transparency-but-not-if-it-means-giving-activists-access/" data-wpel-link="internal">Programmatic Platforms Champion Transparency, But Not If It Means Giving Activists Access</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.adexchanger.com" data-wpel-link="internal">AdExchanger</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.adexchanger.com/programmatic/programmatic-platforms-champion-transparency-but-not-if-it-means-giving-activists-access/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Advertising’s Next Audience Isn’t Human. So We Must Rethink The Value Of Non-Human Traffic</title>
		<link>https://www.adexchanger.com/data-driven-thinking/advertisings-next-audience-isnt-human-so-we-must-rethink-the-value-of-non-human-traffic/</link>
					<comments>https://www.adexchanger.com/data-driven-thinking/advertisings-next-audience-isnt-human-so-we-must-rethink-the-value-of-non-human-traffic/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[AdExchanger Guest Columnist]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 04:35:01 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Data-Driven Thinking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[agentic AI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bot traffic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brand safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cloudflare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[doubleverify]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[generative AI search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ivt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mark zagorski]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[measurement and attribution]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.adexchanger.com/?p=464609</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>For years, advertising has been all about reaching the right human at the right time. That premise, however, is shifting in an unexpected way. Agentic AI has created new complexity, with autonomous “agents” that can increasingly evaluate, compare and execute decisions, from product research to actual purchases. Human-to-agent isn’t an incremental change. It’s a structural [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.adexchanger.com/data-driven-thinking/advertisings-next-audience-isnt-human-so-we-must-rethink-the-value-of-non-human-traffic/" data-wpel-link="internal">Advertising’s Next Audience Isn’t Human. So We Must Rethink The Value Of Non-Human Traffic</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.adexchanger.com" data-wpel-link="internal">AdExchanger</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.adexchanger.com/data-driven-thinking/advertisings-next-audience-isnt-human-so-we-must-rethink-the-value-of-non-human-traffic/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sports Rule The TV Upfronts; Are Reddit And Google Breaking Up?</title>
		<link>https://www.adexchanger.com/daily-news-roundup/sports-rule-the-tv-upfronts-are-reddit-and-google-breaking-up/</link>
					<comments>https://www.adexchanger.com/daily-news-roundup/sports-rule-the-tv-upfronts-are-reddit-and-google-breaking-up/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[AdExchanger]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 04:03:15 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily News Roundup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reddit]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.adexchanger.com/?p=464594</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Sports are where the money is; Reddit’s rethinking its AI licensing strategy; and data targeting has its darker sides.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.adexchanger.com/daily-news-roundup/sports-rule-the-tv-upfronts-are-reddit-and-google-breaking-up/" data-wpel-link="internal">Sports Rule The TV Upfronts; Are Reddit And Google Breaking Up?</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.adexchanger.com" data-wpel-link="internal">AdExchanger</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.adexchanger.com/daily-news-roundup/sports-rule-the-tv-upfronts-are-reddit-and-google-breaking-up/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Alphabet Smashes Ad Revenue Earnings Again – But Does It Still Care About Ads?</title>
		<link>https://www.adexchanger.com/platforms/alphabet-smashes-ad-revenue-earnings-again-but-does-it-still-care-about-ads/</link>
					<comments>https://www.adexchanger.com/platforms/alphabet-smashes-ad-revenue-earnings-again-but-does-it-still-care-about-ads/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[<img src="https://www.adexchanger.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/50-120x120.jpeg"
     alt="Photo of James Hercher"
     width="60"
     height="60"
     class="ai-author-image ai-author-image--circle ai-author-image--inline rounded-circle shadow-offset"
     loading="lazy">
 James Hercher]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 00:01:30 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Platforms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alphabet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[earnings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[youtube]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.adexchanger.com/?p=464602</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The second quarter was what you might call an interesting one for Alphabet – especially if you care about advertising. Google’s Network advertising business, which constitutes ad spend across the open web, was down year over year once again. Meanwhile, in early July, Google lost a years-long appeal against a record 4.1 billion euro antitrust [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.adexchanger.com/platforms/alphabet-smashes-ad-revenue-earnings-again-but-does-it-still-care-about-ads/" data-wpel-link="internal">Alphabet Smashes Ad Revenue Earnings Again – But Does It Still Care About Ads?</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.adexchanger.com" data-wpel-link="internal">AdExchanger</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.adexchanger.com/platforms/alphabet-smashes-ad-revenue-earnings-again-but-does-it-still-care-about-ads/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Comscore Wants To Make Buying Podcast Ads Feel More Like Buying CTV Or Display</title>
		<link>https://www.adexchanger.com/audio/comscore-wants-to-make-buying-podcast-ads-feel-more-like-buying-ctv-or-display/</link>
					<comments>https://www.adexchanger.com/audio/comscore-wants-to-make-buying-podcast-ads-feel-more-like-buying-ctv-or-display/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[<img src="https://www.adexchanger.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/2304-120x120.jpg"
     alt="Photo of Anthony Vargas"
     width="60"
     height="60"
     class="ai-author-image ai-author-image--circle ai-author-image--inline rounded-circle shadow-offset"
     loading="lazy">
 Anthony Vargas]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 10:00:27 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[audio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Acast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[agentic AI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anne Bouttier]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comscore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CTV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital Audio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jessica Trainor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libysn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[omnichannel advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[podcast advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[programmatic audio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Proximic by Comscore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SiriusxM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spotify]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Triton Digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Valerie Reimer]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.adexchanger.com/?p=464507</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Audio platforms are fed up with tolerating the persistent gap between the amount of time people spend listening to podcasts and how much advertisers spend on podcast advertising. So instead of waiting for advertisers to change their habits, these platforms are making their podcast inventory available through the same tools advertisers already use to run [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.adexchanger.com/audio/comscore-wants-to-make-buying-podcast-ads-feel-more-like-buying-ctv-or-display/" data-wpel-link="internal">Comscore Wants To Make Buying Podcast Ads Feel More Like Buying CTV Or Display</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.adexchanger.com" data-wpel-link="internal">AdExchanger</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.adexchanger.com/audio/comscore-wants-to-make-buying-podcast-ads-feel-more-like-buying-ctv-or-display/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>AMC&#8217;s Content Chief Reveals The Three-Part Formula Behind Every Hit Show</title>
		<link>https://www.adexchanger.com/ctv-roundup/amcs-content-chief-reveals-the-three-part-formula-behind-every-hit-show/</link>
					<comments>https://www.adexchanger.com/ctv-roundup/amcs-content-chief-reveals-the-three-part-formula-behind-every-hit-show/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lynn Leahey]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 05:00:14 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[CTV Roundup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dan McDermott]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.adexchanger.com/?p=463997</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Lightning-in-a-bottle characters, a world we've never seen, and something to say. AMC's Dan McDermott breaks down what separates a hit from everything else.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.adexchanger.com/ctv-roundup/amcs-content-chief-reveals-the-three-part-formula-behind-every-hit-show/" data-wpel-link="internal">AMC&#8217;s Content Chief Reveals The Three-Part Formula Behind Every Hit Show</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.adexchanger.com" data-wpel-link="internal">AdExchanger</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.adexchanger.com/ctv-roundup/amcs-content-chief-reveals-the-three-part-formula-behind-every-hit-show/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Disney And Ketchup, Together At Last; The True Cost Of Better Ads</title>
		<link>https://www.adexchanger.com/daily-news-roundup/wednesday-22072026/</link>
					<comments>https://www.adexchanger.com/daily-news-roundup/wednesday-22072026/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[AdExchanger]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 04:35:57 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily News Roundup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[automation bias]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ChatGPT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data brokers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Data Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Disney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[emarketer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[generative AI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kraft-Heinz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[location data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[McDonald's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mountain Dew]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nate Elliott]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[netflix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nicolas Amaya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OpenAI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steve Cahillane]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[surveillance advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taco Bell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TikTok]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[youtube]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.adexchanger.com/?p=464499</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The New Attribution Kraft Heinz owns iconic American grocery brands – but it’s in a slump. Now it’s betting on new marketing flagships for a turnaround. To that end, the company signed a multiyear deal with Disney to put its food inside Disney parks, resorts and cruises, while also securing the right to use Disney characters [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.adexchanger.com/daily-news-roundup/wednesday-22072026/" data-wpel-link="internal">Disney And Ketchup, Together At Last; The True Cost Of Better Ads</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.adexchanger.com" data-wpel-link="internal">AdExchanger</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.adexchanger.com/daily-news-roundup/wednesday-22072026/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sellers Are Fed Up With Amazon, But Can They Force Change?</title>
		<link>https://www.adexchanger.com/commerce/sellers-are-fed-up-with-amazon-but-can-they-force-change/</link>
					<comments>https://www.adexchanger.com/commerce/sellers-are-fed-up-with-amazon-but-can-they-force-change/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[<img src="https://www.adexchanger.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/50-120x120.jpeg"
     alt="Photo of James Hercher"
     width="60"
     height="60"
     class="ai-author-image ai-author-image--circle ai-author-image--inline rounded-circle shadow-offset"
     loading="lazy">
 James Hercher]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 18:42:32 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Commerce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ad boycott]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amazon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amazon ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amazon Boycott]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amazon Sellers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MDS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Million Dollar Sellers]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.adexchanger.com/?p=464477</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Million Dollar Sellers group convened last week in New York City during and around Amazon’s own Seller Growth Summit event. MDS, as the 10-year-old membership-based community of Amazon sellers is known, is probably the closest thing there is to a trade association representing the interests of Amazon sellers, according to Eugene Khayman, a co-founder [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.adexchanger.com/commerce/sellers-are-fed-up-with-amazon-but-can-they-force-change/" data-wpel-link="internal">Sellers Are Fed Up With Amazon, But Can They Force Change?</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.adexchanger.com" data-wpel-link="internal">AdExchanger</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.adexchanger.com/commerce/sellers-are-fed-up-with-amazon-but-can-they-force-change/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Forget The Shiny Objects And Focus On Fundamentals</title>
		<link>https://www.adexchanger.com/adexchanger-talks/forget-the-shiny-objects-and-focus-on-fundamentals/</link>
					<comments>https://www.adexchanger.com/adexchanger-talks/forget-the-shiny-objects-and-focus-on-fundamentals/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[<img src="https://www.adexchanger.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/34-120x120.png"
     alt="Photo of Allison Schiff"
     width="60"
     height="60"
     class="ai-author-image ai-author-image--circle ai-author-image--inline rounded-circle shadow-offset"
     loading="lazy">
 Allison Schiff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 12:53:16 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[AdExchanger Talks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[black box]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[causal AI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[customer data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Havas Converged.AI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Havas Media Network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media measurement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sharona Sankar-King]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transparency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[workflow]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.adexchanger.com/?p=464440</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>In marketing, there’s always a shiny new object to admire, whether it’s a (supposedly) smarter algorithm or a platform promising effortless performance. But the fundamentals always still matter more than whatever’s trending, says Sharona Sankar-King, chief data and product officer at Havas Media Network, North America, on this week’s episode of AdExchanger Talks. Driving profitable [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.adexchanger.com/adexchanger-talks/forget-the-shiny-objects-and-focus-on-fundamentals/" data-wpel-link="internal">Forget The Shiny Objects And Focus On Fundamentals</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.adexchanger.com" data-wpel-link="internal">AdExchanger</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.adexchanger.com/adexchanger-talks/forget-the-shiny-objects-and-focus-on-fundamentals/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- plugin=object-cache-pro client=phpredis metric#hits=3804 metric#misses=24 metric#hit-ratio=99.4 metric#bytes=1870564 metric#prefetches=219 metric#store-reads=30 metric#store-writes=5 metric#store-hits=229 metric#store-misses=10 metric#sql-queries=7 metric#ms-total=445.09 metric#ms-cache=37.53 metric#ms-cache-avg=1.1038 metric#ms-cache-ratio=8.4 -->
