Woking Times

Local council elections

2013-05-01T01:03:00.001+01:00

Does anyone know who is standing in the local elections for the Woking area because I sure as hell don't. I have had one general info. sheet from the Liberal Dhimmicrats and that's all. Who else is standing? No doorstep canvassing, not even a flier from the respective parties. Non of them represent me anyway so I always spoil my ballot paper, but that's not the point. If we don't know who is standing or what political party they represent, why should we vote for them. They get paid now so we should know what we are getting for our money. Load of scumbags, all of them.

World at 8 Monday 8 April 2013

2013-04-09T15:30:00.002+01:00

Islamophobic?
Islamophobic? I think not! Today's news speaks for itself, from disagreement amongst our detractors to disagreement amongst Muslims.
As an European NGO cites opposition to mosque building as Islamophobic.
The Muslim Council of Britain Vows Action To Stop Children Being Groomed For Sex whilst the media, police and government all conspire to hide the crimes of a segment of a community simply because they are Muslim."
The Crown Prosecution warns Sharia courts putting women at risk.
The Met charges sixth person charged in sex trafficking ring investigation, 3 of whom are Muslim.
Am I Islamophobic?
Highlights of the news today Monday 8th April.
• Muslim Council Vows Action To Stop Children Being Groomed For Sex
• Sharia courts putting women at risk, CPS warns
• Sixth person charged in Met trafficking ring investigation
• Baroness Maggie Thatcher dies at 87.
• Young Spaniards Give Up on Job Hunting
• NGO's Cite Opposition to Mosque Building as Islamophobic
• Mosque Building Shifts Into High Gear
• Christian Persecution: Six Quick Takes
• Freed Egyptian Cleric: Muslims Should 'Hate Christians'
• Attack on Christians in Egypt Comes After a Pledge
• Thought for the Day -- Bought and Sold in the UK?
• And finally -- A baby camel and blue waffle disease?

World at 8 Wedneday 3 March 2013

2013-04-05T00:57:00.001+01:00

Cambridgeshire Police smash 'biggest child-sex ring' in the UK News reports say six men of 'various nationalities' have been arrested as part of Cambridgeshire Police operations Earl and Jardine. Buried in the Mirror and Peterborough Telegraph over the Easter weekend is the announcement by Cambridgeshire Police that six men of 'various nationalities' have been arrested for being part of the largest child sex ring in UK history. Ongoing police operations Earl and Jardine have so far uncovered almost 50 alleged victims of rape, abuse and sex slavery aged as young as 12. Detectives fear those numbers could easily reach more than 100 in a case potentially bigger than the Rochdale grooming scandal, where a gang of 'Asian' men abused 47 victims from 'troubled' backgrounds. The suspects were released on police bail. Highlights of the news today Wednesday 3rd April • Justice Minister Admits "We Will Not Change Human Rights Law" • Jobless Iraqi 'Benefit Queen' Sublets £2m Flat for £4,000 a Week • Pesaro Italy Extreme Right Political Group Seals Off Makeshift Mosque • France and Germany snub Cameron on EU law review • Bison Will Roam Forests in Germany Again • Arabs Have Black Slaves Today • Only in America Is The Threat of Islam Ignored • Victoria's Secret Hyper-Sexualizes Teen Age Girls • Thought for the Day - A shift in brit culture? • And Finally - Finally, The Bacon Condom Has Arrived

2013-04-04T14:00:00.000+01:00

SACK IAN DUNCAN SMITH (IDS) NOW! Petition | GoPetition

The Labour Party; The Party of the People, Just Not Ours

2013-01-04T16:41:00.001+00:00

The Labour Party; The Party of the People, Just Not Ours

From Frustrated-Labour threw open Britain’s borders to mass immigration to help socially engineer a “truly multicultural” country, a former Government adviser revealed some time ago. (Daily Telegraph 23rd October 2009)

Andrew Neather, a former adviser to Tony Blair, Jack Straw and David Blunkett exposed Labour’s secret plan to “open up the UK to mass migration” and Labour ministers reluctance to discuss such a move publicly for fear it would alienate its “core working class vote.”

Sir Andrew Green, chairman of the Migrationwatch think tank, said: “Now at least the truth is out, and it’s dynamite.

Many have long suspected that mass immigration under Labour was not just a cock up but also a conspiracy. They were right.”

Labour wanted mass immigration to dissolve English national identity and advance the cause of international socialism.

By throwing open our borders to the world’s poor, Labour betrayed its own traditional working class supporters. We were worst affected as poorer immigrants flooded in and out competed us for jobs, benefits and public housing.

The English poor have become even poorer and we how suffer from:

• Lower, poverty pay for few jobs employers do not prefer to give to cheaper foreign workers

• Cuts in benefits that need to be shared and spread more thinly with immigrants who never contributed a penny towards our welfare system

• Collapsing public services that cannot manage increasing demands on housing, school places and health services etc.

• Increasingly diverse and dysfunctional towns where we no longer feel safe to raise our children (i.e. Muslim grooming and other violent criminal gangs)

Labour now complains about too much austerity, but their actions in Government did more to impoverish their traditional working class supporters than any Tory Government!

Three million immigrants arrived during the final decade of the last Labour Government. The 2011 census confirms Londoners describing themselves as “white British” are now in a minority at just 44.9%.

The resulting strain on public services means London boroughs are now desperately seeking to re-house their immigrants to northern towns.

Your local Labour run Council would happily re-house London’s immigrants, but they are still nervous about alienating their traditional “core working class vote”.

Recent plans to re-house London’s immigrants to Stoke were postponed because the local Labour Council feared a BNP voter backlash in the town.

Labour demands we must all “celebrate diversity” and becoming a minority is “enriching”. They persecute anyone who opposes mass immigration. You can no longer work for the Council unless you support Labour’s multiculturalism policies.

Labour councils even discriminate against English foster parents who they deem not to enthusiastically support multiculturalism and mass immigration.

Voting BNP will help delay Labour’s plans to make English people a minority in our towns.

We must make every effort to force elections where possible in order to replace Labour councillors, before they replace us.

2013-01-03T18:58:00.001+00:00

Question Time for Patriots - London

BNP January 2013

'Shame on England': Where to go if you're corrupt & wanted

2011-06-26T01:38:00.002+01:00

TAX TURNS OUR CHEAP PETROL INTO MOST COSTLY IN EUROPE

2011-06-21T22:04:00.000+01:00

TAX TURNS OUR CHEAP PETROL INTO MOST COSTLY IN EUROPE
Well someone has to pay for the bombs and missiles!

PROOF of the Government’s petrol rip-off was revealed yesterday by figures showing that we have some of the cheapest fuel in Europe – until the tax is added.

An EU website comparing fuel prices across the continent showed that before tax unleaded petrol in Britain costs about 54.7p per litre.

This is far cheaper than petrol anywhere in the EU apart from Germany, Austria, Bulgaria and Estonia.

But once tax is added Britain’s petrol costs on average 136p per litre – among the most expensive.

Diesel is cheaper than Britain’s 58.6p per litre before tax in only Slovenia, Bulgaria and Estonia.

But after tax, the UK average price of 139p per litre is the most expensive in the EU.

This is despite Chancellor George Osborne’s decision in the March Budget to cut fuel duty by 1p per litre and to delay two planned inflationary rises until January and next summer.

“The 1p tax cut was a step in the right direction. But when you compare the level of tax we pay at the pump to other EU countries it’s clear it was quite a small one.” Motorists currently pay about £45billion a year in taxes including £26billion in fuel duty.

Peter Carroll of FairFuelUk.com said the Government should be cutting the fuel tax.

He said: “The level of tax borders on the criminal. We should be moving towards reducing fuel taxes. We should get rid of all future rises.”

The Treasury said Mr Osborne had moved to help motorists at his last Budget.

A spokesman said: “Petrol taxes would be 6p higher if it wasn’t for the Budget in which he scrapped the planned tax increases, paid for by the fair fuel escalator on North Sea oil companies.”

Daily rant on the news

2011-06-19T15:29:00.000+01:00

Deadly E. coli was Engineered?

2011-06-19T15:13:00.002+01:00

Futility of war - by a soldier

2011-06-18T14:03:00.001+01:00

Whta you don't see on the BBC

2011-06-17T22:53:00.002+01:00

Time for Britains to wake up............#

Britain Leads the World (in Giving Away Money)

2011-05-29T03:39:00.000+01:00

The ConDems gave away a record £8.5 billion in foreign aid in 2010, making Britain the most proportionally generous country in the world, and the total is set to rise year on year.

Britain gave the highest percentage of any country’s GDP to foreign lands, sticking rigorously to a misguided six-year-old G8 pledge to throw 0.7 per cent of taxpayers’ money away by 2013, a promise other countries seem to have long since forgotten.

The British foreign aid bill is set to rise year after year, reaching an estimated £12 billion by 2014.

In fact, Britain is donating double the G8 average foreign aid contribution, spending 0.56 per cent of GDP compared to the 0.28 per cent norm.

Compared with the other G8 countries, Britain spends £600 million more than France, £700 million more than Germany, £1.7 billion more than Japan and £4.4 billion more than Canada, Italy and Russia combined. Only the United States gives away more, £18.5 billion; however, that accounts for just 0.21 per cent of its GDP.

Part of Britain’s contribution will involve a gift of £110 million to North African countries such as Egypt and Tunisia over the next four years in support of the Arab Spring riots.

Up to £40 million of that will come from the Foreign Office for “political reform”, and £70 million from the Department of International Development to boost the countries’ struggling economies.

When announcing the aid to North Africa, Cameron repeated the same platitudinous excuses that he gave when he handed over £650 million of taxpayers’ money to Pakistan in April.

Then, he said the money to Pakistan would help avoid “the problems of migration [and] of extremism” and that “it’s in our interest that Pakistan succeeds”.

Clearly employing the same speech writer, Mr Cameron yesterday announced, “If we can secure greater democracy and freedom in countries like Egypt and Tunisia, that is good for us back at home.

“That will mean less extremism, it will mean more peace and prosperity, and it will mean there won’t be the pressures of immigration that we might otherwise face to our own country.”

In 2005, the richest eight nations pledged to hike aid spending to 0.7 per cent of their gross national products by 2013.

Since 2004, Britain has raised spending on overseas aid by a whopping 74 per cent, three times the level of increase in Japan and Italy. Other countries have failed to find £12 billion of the cash they pledged in 2005.

The chief beneficiary of British aid is India, a country that has its own space, nuclear and foreign aid programmes. It gets £295 million a year.

Other top yearly recipients include Ethiopia (£214m and set to rise), Bangladesh (£149m and set to rise), Sudan (£146m), Tanzania (£144m), Afghanistan (£133m), Nigeria (114m and set to rise), the Democratic Republic of Congo (£109m and set to rise), Ghana (£90m) and, of course, Pakistan, which is set to receive a staggering £446 million a year from British taxpayers.

Libya – not our business

2011-05-25T17:58:00.001+01:00

What’s Libya got to do with us? Nothing! What business is it of Britain’s which tribe is on top in their age-old tribal divide? None! Do we have the right to interfere in the affairs of another sovereign nation? No!
Could we find a better use for the £800,000 blown with every cruise missile? Yes! Has David Cameron broken his election not to rush into any more foreign wars? Yes! Will a “rebel” victory turn Libya into another failed state dominated by Islamist fanatics? Yes!
Would the British National Party end this gruesome turkey-shoot before it becomes another foreign-policy disaster like Iraq or Afghanistan? Yes! While the establishment parties are all back this insane neo-con move to destabilise the Middle East and drag us into another 30 year war, we argue for peace and keeping our noses out of other peoples quarrels. No wonder they wanted us out of the way.
We also warn the political elite that the neo-con fabricated “Arab Spring” far from being good for the West, is opening up the floodgates of African and Muslim immigration. We face the full-scale invasion of Europe.
1,000 Tunisians a day are flooding into Ital. When Camoron’s meddling removes Gaddafi, hundreds of thousands will pour through the gap that the Colonel kept closed.
This immigration tsunami will either trigger a nationalist revolution across Europe, or it will lead to the Islamic conquest of the West. Either way, Camoron or his allies will one day face justice for their crimes and their arrogant folly.

Week of rage: Protests spreading worldwide

2011-05-23T15:19:00.001+01:00

Britain today

2011-05-22T13:19:00.001+01:00

Amazing Speech by an American war veteran

2011-05-18T00:34:00.002+01:00

The elephant in the room

2011-05-07T14:57:00.001+01:00

The police state in the USA

2011-05-03T11:07:00.000+01:00

Coming to a town near you very soon.

Keiser Report: Cocaine Makes World Go Round (E136)

2011-04-10T13:20:00.002+01:00

I Want My Country Back

2011-02-17T23:37:00.000+00:00

Europe 2029

2011-02-04T11:57:00.000+00:00

Internet nuke bomb waiting to go off

2011-01-11T16:06:00.000+00:00

2011-01-06T13:21:00.002+00:00

The biggest bunch of crooks ever now inhabit Westminster.

Teaching Maths in Britain

2010-12-27T14:59:00.002+00:00

Teaching Maths in Britain
1. Teaching Maths In 1970
A logger sells a truckload of timber for £100..
His cost of production is 4/5 of the price.
What is his profit?

2. Teaching Maths In 1980
A logger sells a truckload of timber for £100.
His cost of production is 80% of the price.
What is his profit?

3. Teaching Maths In 1990
A logger sells a truckload of timber for £100.
His cost of production is £80.
How much was his profit?

4. Teaching Maths In 2000
A logger sells a truckload of timber for £100.
His cost of production is £80 and his profit is £20.
Your assignment: Underline the number 20.

5. Teaching Maths In 2005
A logger cuts down a beautiful forest because he is selfish and inconsiderate and cares nothing for the habit of animals or the preservation of our woodlands.
Your assignment: Discuss how the birds and squirrels might feel as the logger cut down their homes just for a measly profit of £20.

6. Teaching Maths In 2009
A logger is arrested for trying to cut down a tree in case it may be offensive to Muslims or other religious groups not consulted in the felling licence. He is also fined a £100 as his chainsaw is in breach of Health and Safety legislation as it deemed too dangerous and could cut something... He has used the chainsaw for over 20 years without incident however he does not have the correct certificate of competence and is therefore considered to be a recidivist and habitual criminal. His DNA is sampled and his details circulated throughout all government agencies. He protests and is taken to court and fined another £100 because he is such an easy target.

When he is released he returns to find Gypsies have cut down half his wood to build a camp on his land. He tries to throw them off but is arrested, prosecuted for harassing an ethnic minority, imprisoned and fined a further £100. While he is in jail again the Gypsies cut down the rest of his wood and sell it on the black market for £100 cash. They also have a departure BBQ of squirrel and pheasant and leave behind several tonnes of rubbish and asbestos sheeting.

The forester on release is warned that failure to clear the fly tipped rubbish immediately at his own cost is an offence. He complains and is arrested for environmental pollution, breach of the peace and invoiced £12,000 plus VAT for safe disposal costs by a regulated government contractor.

Your assignment: How many times is the logger going to have to be arrested and fined before he realises that he is never going to make £20 profit by hard work, give up, sign onto the dole and live off the state for the rest of his life?

7. Teaching Maths In 2010
A logger doesn’t sell a lorry load of timber because he can’t get a loan to buy a new lorry because his bank has spent all his and their money on a derivative of securitised debt related to sub- prime mortgages in Alabama and lost the lot with only some government money left to pay a few million pound bonuses to their senior directors and the traders who made the biggest losses.

The logger struggles to pay the £1,200 road tax on his old lorry however, as it was built in the 1970s it no longer meets the emissions regulations and he is forced to scrap it.

Some Bulgarian loggers buy the lorry from the scrap merchant and put it back on the road. They undercut everyone on price for haulage and send their cash back home, while claiming unemployment for themselves and their relatives. If questioned they speak no English and it is easier to deport them at the governments expense. Following their holiday back home they return to the UK with different names and fresh girls and start again. The logger protests, is accused of being a bigoted racist and as his name is on the side of his old lorry he is forced to pay £1,500 registration fees as a gang master.

The Government borrows more money to pay more to the bankers as bonus's are not cheap. The parliamentarians feel they are missing out and claim the difference on expenses and allowances.
You do the maths.

8. Teaching Maths 2017
أ المسجل تبيع حموله شاحنة من الخشب من اجل 100 دولار. صاحب تكلفة
الانتاج 80 من الثمن. ما هو الربح له؟= 20