<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">

<channel>
	<title>Vendor Compliance</title>
	
	<link>http://vendorcompliance.vendormate.com</link>
	<description>"Know Your Vendor" -- the pulse of vendor management</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 21:15:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<cloud domain="vendorcompliance.vendormate.com" port="80" path="/?rsscloud=notify" registerProcedure="" protocol="http-post" />

			<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/VendorCompliance" type="application/rss+xml" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com" /><item>
		<title>HITECH Increases HIPAA Risk</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/VendorCompliance/~3/ZIu1u9y3E2k/</link>
		<comments>http://vendorcompliance.vendormate.com/2009/10/30/hitech-increases-hipaa-risk/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 21:15:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>vendorcompliance</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HIPAA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HITECH]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vendorcompliance.vendormate.com/?p=450</guid>
		<description>Risk to violators, that is.   Be sure to read the new  interim final rule posted today.   Key to the proposed changes is that the maximum penalty increases 60-fold &amp;#8212; to $1.5 million for violations of an idential provision.   And a covered entity can no longer bar the penalty unless correction is made within 30 days [...]&lt;img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=vendorcompliance.vendormate.com&amp;blog=658210&amp;post=450&amp;subd=vendorcompliance&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" /&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/VendorCompliance/~4/ZIu1u9y3E2k" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://vendorcompliance.vendormate.com/2009/10/30/hitech-increases-hipaa-risk/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/691a8681a10f0bee81fb97db19fba565?s=96&amp;d=identicon&amp;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">vendorcompliance</media:title>
		</media:content>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://vendorcompliance.vendormate.com/2009/10/30/hitech-increases-hipaa-risk/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Swine Flu and Vendor Credentialing:  Part II</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/VendorCompliance/~3/CBUjdFktWfs/</link>
		<comments>http://vendorcompliance.vendormate.com/2009/10/23/swine-flu-and-vendor-credentialing-part-ii/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 15:49:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>vendorcompliance</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Immunization Requirements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vendor compliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vendor credentials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vendor management]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vendorcompliance.vendormate.com/?p=443</guid>
		<description>Last May in the Swine Flu and Vendor Credentialing post, we highlighted the new reality that a number of customer hospitals were email visiting vendor representatives to new H1N1 precautions.   These hospitals relied on their Vendormate registration files for current vendor contact information.    Most of these notes were gentle reminders of communicable disease best practices and basically read, &amp;#8220;if you&amp;#8217;re sick, [...]&lt;img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=vendorcompliance.vendormate.com&amp;blog=658210&amp;post=443&amp;subd=vendorcompliance&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" /&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/VendorCompliance/~4/CBUjdFktWfs" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://vendorcompliance.vendormate.com/2009/10/23/swine-flu-and-vendor-credentialing-part-ii/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/691a8681a10f0bee81fb97db19fba565?s=96&amp;d=identicon&amp;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">vendorcompliance</media:title>
		</media:content>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://vendorcompliance.vendormate.com/2009/10/23/swine-flu-and-vendor-credentialing-part-ii/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>HHS Breach Notification Form On line</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/VendorCompliance/~3/P8MSTbkPPR0/</link>
		<comments>http://vendorcompliance.vendormate.com/2009/10/06/hhs-breach-notification-form-on-line/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 18:40:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>vendorcompliance</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OIG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vendorcompliance.vendormate.com/?p=438</guid>
		<description>The Hunton &amp;#38; Williams privacy and security blog has been very active recently.   It covers a wide range of issues of interest to many industries.     Last Friday, they noted that the Department of Health and Human Services had added the on-line form for breach notifications.  
For all of you worried about the burden of reporting a breach, take [...]&lt;img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=vendorcompliance.vendormate.com&amp;blog=658210&amp;post=438&amp;subd=vendorcompliance&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" /&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/VendorCompliance/~4/P8MSTbkPPR0" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://vendorcompliance.vendormate.com/2009/10/06/hhs-breach-notification-form-on-line/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/691a8681a10f0bee81fb97db19fba565?s=96&amp;d=identicon&amp;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">vendorcompliance</media:title>
		</media:content>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://vendorcompliance.vendormate.com/2009/10/06/hhs-breach-notification-form-on-line/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>HITECH &amp; BAA &amp; Vendor Credentialing</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/VendorCompliance/~3/uO--36asOcI/</link>
		<comments>http://vendorcompliance.vendormate.com/2009/09/11/hitech-baa-vendor-credentialing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 17:33:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>vendorcompliance</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BAA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HITECH]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vendorcompliance.vendormate.com/?p=434</guid>
		<description>Several of our healthcare customers came together for a call last week to talk about the implications of the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health (HITECH) Act, particularly as it concerns vendors that meet the &amp;#8220;Business Associate&amp;#8221; requirement.   Representing hospitals from California to Florida to Michigan and in between, these systems shared a common [...]&lt;img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=vendorcompliance.vendormate.com&amp;blog=658210&amp;post=434&amp;subd=vendorcompliance&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" /&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/VendorCompliance/~4/uO--36asOcI" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://vendorcompliance.vendormate.com/2009/09/11/hitech-baa-vendor-credentialing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/691a8681a10f0bee81fb97db19fba565?s=96&amp;d=identicon&amp;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">vendorcompliance</media:title>
		</media:content>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://vendorcompliance.vendormate.com/2009/09/11/hitech-baa-vendor-credentialing/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Getting the Word Out</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/VendorCompliance/~3/CVG-Oj-lTOk/</link>
		<comments>http://vendorcompliance.vendormate.com/2009/08/25/getting-the-word-out/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 14:44:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>vendorcompliance</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[vendor compliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vendor management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supply chain]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vendorcompliance.vendormate.com/?p=423</guid>
		<description>I&amp;#8217;ll suggest that the day-to-day reality of compliance management is more about actively communicating the sets of unacceptable behaviors rather than uncovering and punishing perpetrators.   After all, the vast majority of people follow community standards of ethical behavior (except, perhaps, during rush hour).    For this reason, it&amp;#8217;s not surprising to see recommendations like this recent one from Supply Chain Management [...]&lt;img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=vendorcompliance.vendormate.com&amp;blog=658210&amp;post=423&amp;subd=vendorcompliance&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" /&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/VendorCompliance/~4/CVG-Oj-lTOk" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://vendorcompliance.vendormate.com/2009/08/25/getting-the-word-out/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/691a8681a10f0bee81fb97db19fba565?s=96&amp;d=identicon&amp;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">vendorcompliance</media:title>
		</media:content>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://vendorcompliance.vendormate.com/2009/08/25/getting-the-word-out/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>States Reinforce CMS Exclusion Guidelines</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/VendorCompliance/~3/F8i9ajwztxc/</link>
		<comments>http://vendorcompliance.vendormate.com/2009/08/17/states-reinforce-cms-exclusion-guidelines/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 16:03:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>vendorcompliance</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[HHS OIG LEIE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare/Medicaid CMS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CMS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LEIE]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vendorcompliance.vendormate.com/?p=417</guid>
		<description>In January, 2009, the Centers for Medicare &amp;#38; Medicate Services (CMS) released a State Medicaid Director Letter (SMDL #09-001) clarifying and reminding States of the requirements and consequences of payments to excluded individuals and entities.
Since then, states have been at work communicating the same requirements either under their own letterhead or by re-post.  A quick [...]&lt;img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=vendorcompliance.vendormate.com&amp;blog=658210&amp;post=417&amp;subd=vendorcompliance&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" /&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/VendorCompliance/~4/F8i9ajwztxc" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://vendorcompliance.vendormate.com/2009/08/17/states-reinforce-cms-exclusion-guidelines/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/691a8681a10f0bee81fb97db19fba565?s=96&amp;d=identicon&amp;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">vendorcompliance</media:title>
		</media:content>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://vendorcompliance.vendormate.com/2009/08/17/states-reinforce-cms-exclusion-guidelines/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Healthcare Crackdown on Fraud</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/VendorCompliance/~3/GJoZ92zIb30/</link>
		<comments>http://vendorcompliance.vendormate.com/2009/07/30/healthcare-crackdown-on-fraud/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 17:40:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>vendorcompliance</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[vendor compliance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vendorcompliance.vendormate.com/?p=412</guid>
		<description>John Commins over at  HealthLeaders  recently wrote about the ever-rising focus on fraud in the healthcare.   In his article, Culture of Compliance Preempts Whistleblower Suits, he makes the point that the potential gains to the whistleblower in a difficult economy could easily increase the number of whistleblower suits.  He continues that creating a culture of compliance, with appropriate reporting [...]&lt;img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=vendorcompliance.vendormate.com&amp;blog=658210&amp;post=412&amp;subd=vendorcompliance&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" /&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/VendorCompliance/~4/GJoZ92zIb30" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://vendorcompliance.vendormate.com/2009/07/30/healthcare-crackdown-on-fraud/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/691a8681a10f0bee81fb97db19fba565?s=96&amp;d=identicon&amp;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">vendorcompliance</media:title>
		</media:content>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://vendorcompliance.vendormate.com/2009/07/30/healthcare-crackdown-on-fraud/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Bankruptcy, Part II</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/VendorCompliance/~3/RRxcWJf-ds8/</link>
		<comments>http://vendorcompliance.vendormate.com/2009/07/10/bankruptcy-part-ii/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 20:50:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>vendorcompliance</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Know Your Vendor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[risk management]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vendorcompliance.vendormate.com/?p=408</guid>
		<description>Back in October, we posted the BPM or Bankruptcy Page Metric, which was just a count of the pages of Chapter 11 filings in the US Bankruptcy Court, District of Delaware.   From a base of 3 pages of filing in January, 2008, the number of pages in the filings jumped to 16 pages in August, 2008.  
Now, we see [...]&lt;img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=vendorcompliance.vendormate.com&amp;blog=658210&amp;post=408&amp;subd=vendorcompliance&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" /&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/VendorCompliance/~4/RRxcWJf-ds8" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://vendorcompliance.vendormate.com/2009/07/10/bankruptcy-part-ii/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/691a8681a10f0bee81fb97db19fba565?s=96&amp;d=identicon&amp;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">vendorcompliance</media:title>
		</media:content>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://vendorcompliance.vendormate.com/2009/07/10/bankruptcy-part-ii/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Vendor Program Audits:  From Homeroom to First Period</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/VendorCompliance/~3/R7lAERfbS9o/</link>
		<comments>http://vendorcompliance.vendormate.com/2009/07/01/vendor-program-audits-from-homeroom-to-first-period/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 21:12:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>vendorcompliance</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Badging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[risk management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vendor management]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vendorcompliance.vendormate.com/?p=399</guid>
		<description>Back on the topic of vendor program audits, this week is about auditing the hospital&amp;#8217;s own participation in the vendor program.   I&amp;#8217;ve made my middle-school son the stand-in for vendor representatives, so let&amp;#8217;s turn the table and make his teachers the analogy for hospital staff.
Our school system has a set of guidelines for teachers.   But not surprisingly [...]&lt;img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=vendorcompliance.vendormate.com&amp;blog=658210&amp;post=399&amp;subd=vendorcompliance&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" /&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/VendorCompliance/~4/R7lAERfbS9o" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://vendorcompliance.vendormate.com/2009/07/01/vendor-program-audits-from-homeroom-to-first-period/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/691a8681a10f0bee81fb97db19fba565?s=96&amp;d=identicon&amp;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">vendorcompliance</media:title>
		</media:content>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://vendorcompliance.vendormate.com/2009/07/01/vendor-program-audits-from-homeroom-to-first-period/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Vendor Credentialing for Brides</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/VendorCompliance/~3/n_q5ig3wyJs/</link>
		<comments>http://vendorcompliance.vendormate.com/2009/06/17/verified-valid/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 15:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>vendorcompliance</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[vendor credentials]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vendorcompliance.vendormate.com/?p=384</guid>
		<description>I&amp;#8217;m going to digress a bit this week to highlight the expansion of vendor verification and credentialing into other verticals beyond healthcare.  
Buyers have always turned to references for reassurance when they lacked personal experience in selecting a supplier.   And as the internet expands a buyer&amp;#8217;s access to potential suppliers to infinite levels, references and credentials become even more meaningful.   At [...]&lt;img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=vendorcompliance.vendormate.com&amp;blog=658210&amp;post=384&amp;subd=vendorcompliance&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" /&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/VendorCompliance/~4/n_q5ig3wyJs" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://vendorcompliance.vendormate.com/2009/06/17/verified-valid/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/691a8681a10f0bee81fb97db19fba565?s=96&amp;d=identicon&amp;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">vendorcompliance</media:title>
		</media:content>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://vendorcompliance.vendormate.com/2009/06/17/verified-valid/</feedburner:origLink></item>
	</channel>
</rss>
