<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/atom10full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:openSearch="http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearch/1.1/" xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0" xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" gd:etag="W/&quot;Dk4FQHw_cSp7ImA9WhdQEk0.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5440667314879833095</id><updated>2011-08-12T22:08:31.249-05:00</updated><title>Unemployment Statistics</title><subtitle type="html">Nuggets of knowledge, statistics and advice about unemployment</subtitle><link rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#feed" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://unemploymentadvice.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://unemploymentadvice.blogspot.com/" /><link rel="next" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5440667314879833095/posts/default?start-index=26&amp;max-results=25&amp;redirect=false&amp;v=2" /><author><name>Tom M</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/14355090527967294216</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email></author><generator version="7.00" uri="http://www.blogger.com">Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>426</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>25</openSearch:itemsPerPage><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/UnemploymentStatistics" /><feedburner:info uri="unemploymentstatistics" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;CUMAR3s-cCp7ImA9Wx9REU0.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5440667314879833095.post-5012027221701070017</id><published>2010-12-11T15:33:00.002-06:00</published><updated>2010-12-11T15:37:26.558-06:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2010-12-11T15:37:26.558-06:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="unemployment insurance" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="EUC" /><title>How Does EUC work?</title><content type="html">For people who are wondering how the Emergency Unemployment Compensation works, the folks at the &lt;a href="http://www.cbpp.org/cms/index.cfm?fa=view&amp;amp;id=3164"&gt;center for budget and policy priorities&lt;/a&gt; have issued a handy bit of information for how many weeks of unemployment you can expect to receive depending on what state you have worked in.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;**********************************************&lt;br /&gt;&lt;p&gt;The unemployment insurance (UI) system helps many people who have  lost their jobs by temporarily replacing part of their wages.  (See “&lt;a href="http://www.cbpp.org/cms/index.cfm?fa=view&amp;amp;id=3157"&gt;Policy Basics: Unemployment Insurance&lt;/a&gt;.”)  The total number of weeks of benefits available in any particular state  depends on the unemployment rate and unemployment insurance laws in the state where the person worked. The map below shows the maximum number of weeks of benefits available in each state.&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p align="center"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.cbpp.org/images/cms//PolicyBasics_UI_Weeks_map_opt_9-201.jpg" alt="" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;Workers in any state can receive up to 26 weeks of benefits from the regular state-funded unemployment compensation program.&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;In  the current downturn, workers in any state who exhaust their regular UI  benefits before they can find a job can receive up to 34 additional  weeks of benefits through the temporary federal Emergency Unemployment  Compensation (EUC) program enacted in 2008.  That number rises to 53  weeks in states with especially high unemployment rates.&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;Workers  who exhaust their regular UI and EUC benefits can receive additional  weeks of benefits through the permanent federal-state Extended Benefits  (EB) program if their state’s unemployment insurance laws allow it (see  table below).&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p align="center"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.cbpp.org/images/cms//PolicyBasics_UI_Weeks_table1-rev8-30-10.jpg" alt="" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;The  table below shows how many states fall into each category shown in the  map, and what combination of regular UI, EUC, and EB benefits produces  the total for those states.&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p align="center"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.cbpp.org/images/cms//PolicyBasics_UI_Weeks_table2_opt_9-13.jpg" alt="" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/5440667314879833095-5012027221701070017?l=unemploymentadvice.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://unemploymentadvice.blogspot.com/feeds/5012027221701070017/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5440667314879833095&amp;postID=5012027221701070017" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5440667314879833095/posts/default/5012027221701070017?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5440667314879833095/posts/default/5012027221701070017?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/UnemploymentStatistics/~3/DltH5siPwfk/how-does-euc-work.html" title="How Does EUC work?" /><author><name>Tom M</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/14355090527967294216</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://unemploymentadvice.blogspot.com/2010/12/how-does-euc-work.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;DkIGQHk5eSp7ImA9Wx5UGUo.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5440667314879833095.post-1592046506064287800</id><published>2010-10-24T21:36:00.004-05:00</published><updated>2010-10-24T21:42:01.721-05:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2010-10-24T21:42:01.721-05:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="unemployment insurance" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="60 minutes" /><title>60 minutes story on the 99 weeks of Unemployment</title><content type="html">&lt;embed src="http://cnettv.cnet.com/av/video/cbsnews/atlantis2/cbsnews_player_embed.swf" scale="noscale" salign="lt" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" background="#333333" allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" flashvars="si=254&amp;amp;uvpc=http://cnettv.cnet.com/av/video/cbsnews/atlantis2/uvp_cbsnews.xml&amp;amp;contentType=videoId&amp;amp;contentValue=50094869&amp;amp;ccEnabled=false&amp;amp;hdEnabled=false&amp;amp;fsEnabled=true&amp;amp;shareEnabled=false&amp;amp;dlEnabled=false&amp;amp;subEnabled=false&amp;amp;playlistDisplay=none&amp;amp;playlistType=none&amp;amp;playerWidth=425&amp;amp;playerHeight=239&amp;amp;vidWidth=425&amp;amp;vidHeight=239&amp;amp;autoplay=false&amp;amp;bbuttonDisplay=none&amp;amp;playOverlayText=PLAY%20CBS%20NEWS%20VIDEO&amp;amp;refreshMpuEnabled=true&amp;amp;shareUrl=http://www.cbsnews.com/video/watch/?id=6979287n&amp;amp;adEngine=dart&amp;amp;adCallTemplate=http://www.cbs.com/thunder/ad.doubleclick.net/adx/request.php?/can/news/undefined;site=news;show=undefined;undefinedpartner=news;lvid=50094869;outlet=CBS+Production;noAd=undefined;type=ros;format=FLV;pos=undefined;sz=320x240;ord=568259;playerVersion=1.0;&amp;amp;adPreroll=true&amp;amp;adPrerollType=PreContent&amp;amp;adPrerollValue=1" height="279" width="425"&gt;&lt;/embed&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/video/watch/?id=6979287n"&gt;60 minutes did a story on people who are running out of the 99 weeks of Unemployment checks&lt;/a&gt;.  They speak about people who have spent hardship withdrawls from their 401k's and now depend on charities for free food.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;They have stories of people who earned $70,000 to $200,000 who were shop-a-holics and now after having applied to hundreds of jobs are forced to scrounge around for recyclables and depend on family and friends for financial help.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;input id="gwProxy" type="hidden"&gt;&lt;!--Session data--&gt;&lt;input onclick="if(typeof(jsCall)=='function'){jsCall();}else{setTimeout('jsCall()',500);}" id="jsProxy" type="hidden"&gt;&lt;div id="refHTML"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/5440667314879833095-1592046506064287800?l=unemploymentadvice.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://unemploymentadvice.blogspot.com/feeds/1592046506064287800/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5440667314879833095&amp;postID=1592046506064287800" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5440667314879833095/posts/default/1592046506064287800?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5440667314879833095/posts/default/1592046506064287800?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/UnemploymentStatistics/~3/jKuJoqcG6WU/60-minutes-story-on-99-weeks-of.html" title="60 minutes story on the 99 weeks of Unemployment" /><author><name>Tom M</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/14355090527967294216</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://unemploymentadvice.blogspot.com/2010/10/60-minutes-story-on-99-weeks-of.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;Dk8BQX0-fyp7ImA9Wx5UEUk.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5440667314879833095.post-3546043224129785195</id><published>2010-10-15T07:07:00.003-05:00</published><updated>2010-10-15T07:14:10.357-05:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2010-10-15T07:14:10.357-05:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="New York" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Nevada" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="unemployment insurance" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="California" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Illinois" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Georgia" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="North Carolina" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="New Jersey" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Texas" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="unemployment benefit" /><title>How Many Weeks of Unemployment do I get?</title><content type="html">&lt;a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/__V1GJlBadyE/TLhEQ46R0DI/AAAAAAAABBI/Hcx5vPvnyYM/s1600/2010-10-How+Many+Weeks+of+Unemployment+Do+I+get.jpg"&gt;&lt;img style="display: block; margin: 0px auto 10px; text-align: center; cursor: pointer; width: 439px; height: 313px;" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/__V1GJlBadyE/TLhEQ46R0DI/AAAAAAAABBI/Hcx5vPvnyYM/s320/2010-10-How+Many+Weeks+of+Unemployment+Do+I+get.jpg" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5528243599542702130" border="0" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Click on Map for a Larger Image&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;If you're wondering just how many weeks of unemployment you're eligible for, the people at the &lt;a href="http://www.cbpp.org/cms/index.cfm?fa=view&amp;amp;id=3164"&gt;center of budget and policy on priorities&lt;/a&gt; produced this interesting chart that shows that much of the nation is able to receive 99 weeks of unemployment checks.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Many states such as Florida, California, Michigan, Ohio, Illinois, Georgia, Nevada, Arizona, North Carolina, Ohio and Illinois get the full 99 weeks of payments.  Other states such as Wisconsin, Texas and New York get 93 weeks of unemployment benefits; while the dakotas and Nebraska get the least---60 weeks (which really isn't all that bad because it's still over a year of subsidies).&lt;br /&gt;&lt;input id="gwProxy" type="hidden"&gt;&lt;!--Session data--&gt;&lt;input onclick="if(typeof(jsCall)=='function'){jsCall();}else{setTimeout('jsCall()',500);}" id="jsProxy" type="hidden"&gt;&lt;div id="refHTML"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/5440667314879833095-3546043224129785195?l=unemploymentadvice.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://unemploymentadvice.blogspot.com/feeds/3546043224129785195/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5440667314879833095&amp;postID=3546043224129785195" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5440667314879833095/posts/default/3546043224129785195?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5440667314879833095/posts/default/3546043224129785195?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/UnemploymentStatistics/~3/TJPW2OTfzag/how-many-weeks-of-unemployment-do-i-get.html" title="How Many Weeks of Unemployment do I get?" /><author><name>Tom M</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/14355090527967294216</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/__V1GJlBadyE/TLhEQ46R0DI/AAAAAAAABBI/Hcx5vPvnyYM/s72-c/2010-10-How+Many+Weeks+of+Unemployment+Do+I+get.jpg" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://unemploymentadvice.blogspot.com/2010/10/how-many-weeks-of-unemployment-do-i-get.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;D04ASH8yeip7ImA9Wx5UEU0.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5440667314879833095.post-4255607290343240765</id><published>2010-10-14T20:20:00.002-05:00</published><updated>2010-10-14T20:25:49.192-05:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2010-10-14T20:25:49.192-05:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Unemployment Rate" /><title>What's the employment situation?</title><content type="html">According to the &lt;a href="http://www.bls.gov/news.release/pdf/empsit.pdf"&gt;Bureau of Labor Statistics&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;blockquote style="font-style: italic;"&gt;THE EMPLOYMENT SITUATION – SEPTEMBER 2010&lt;br /&gt;Nonfarm payroll employment edged down (-95,000) in September, and the unemployment rate was unchanged at 9.6 percent, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported today. Government employment declined (-159,000), reflecting both a drop in the number of temporary jobs for Census 2010 and job losses in local government.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Household Survey Data&lt;br /&gt;The number of unemployed persons, at 14.8 million, was essentially unchanged in September, and the unemployment rate held at 9.6 percent. (See table A-1.)&lt;br /&gt;Among the major worker groups, the unemployment rate for adult men (9.8 percent), adult women (8.0 percent), teenagers (26.0 percent), whites (8.7 percent), blacks (16.1 percent), and Hispanics (12.4 percent) showed little or no change in September. The jobless rate for Asians was 6.4 percent, not seasonally&lt;br /&gt;adjusted. (See tables A-1, A-2, and A-3.)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The number of long-term unemployed (those jobless for 27 weeks and over), at 6.1 million, was little changed over the month but was down by 640,000 since a series high of 6.8 million in May. In September, 1.7 percent of unemployed persons had been jobless for 27 weeks or more. (See table A-12.) In September, both the civilian labor force participation rate, at 64.7 percent, and the employmentpopulation&lt;br /&gt;ratio, at 58.5 percent, were unchanged. (See table A-1.) The number of persons employed part time for economic reasons (sometimes referred to as involuntary&lt;br /&gt;part-time workers) rose by 612,000 over the month to 9.5 million.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Over the past 2 months, the number of such workers has increased by 943,000. These individuals were working part time because their hours had been cut back or because they were unable to find a full-time job. (See table A-8.) About 2.5 million persons were marginally attached to the labor force in September, up from 2.2 million a year earlier. (The data are not seasonally adjusted.) These individuals were not in the labor force, wanted and were available for work, and had looked for a job sometime in the prior 12 months.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;They were not counted as unemployed because they had not searched for work in the 4 weeks preceding the survey. (See table A-16.)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Among the marginally attached, there were 1.2 million discouraged workers in September, an increase of 503,000 from a year earlier. (The data are not seasonally adjusted.) Discouraged workers are persons not currently looking for work because they believe no jobs are available for them. The remaining 1.3&lt;br /&gt;million persons marginally attached to the labor force had not searched for work in the 4 weeks preceding the survey for reasons such as school attendance or family responsibilities.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;input id="gwProxy" type="hidden"&gt;&lt;!--Session data--&gt;&lt;input onclick="if(typeof(jsCall)=='function'){jsCall();}else{setTimeout('jsCall()',500);}" id="jsProxy" type="hidden"&gt;&lt;div id="refHTML"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/5440667314879833095-4255607290343240765?l=unemploymentadvice.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://unemploymentadvice.blogspot.com/feeds/4255607290343240765/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5440667314879833095&amp;postID=4255607290343240765" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5440667314879833095/posts/default/4255607290343240765?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5440667314879833095/posts/default/4255607290343240765?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/UnemploymentStatistics/~3/50DafldKvns/whats-employment-situation.html" title="What's the employment situation?" /><author><name>Tom M</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/14355090527967294216</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://unemploymentadvice.blogspot.com/2010/10/whats-employment-situation.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;Ak8BSXk7cSp7ImA9WxBWGUw.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5440667314879833095.post-6063070482817425893</id><published>2010-02-11T13:54:00.002-06:00</published><updated>2010-02-11T14:07:38.709-06:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2010-02-11T14:07:38.709-06:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Unemployment Rate" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="jobless claims" /><title>Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi's US Economist on the Unemployment Picture</title><content type="html">&lt;object width="320" height="265"&gt;&lt;param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/_4ZTX0r7YBQ&amp;amp;hl=en_US&amp;amp;fs=1&amp;amp;"&gt;&lt;param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"&gt;&lt;param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"&gt;&lt;embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/_4ZTX0r7YBQ&amp;amp;hl=en_US&amp;amp;fs=1&amp;amp;" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="320" height="265"&gt;&lt;/embed&gt;&lt;/object&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;On February 5th, Bloomberg interviewed Ellen Zentner, Senior US economist at Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd. to discuss the January unemployment rate and the outlook for the US Labor Market.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Ellen's views include:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;ul&gt;&lt;li&gt;"the labor market is definitely improving, we got a bigger downward revision to payroll data, leading up to today... No we lost 8.4 million jobs vs over 7 million...   And this contraction in jobs correlates more to the decline in consumer spending."&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;In january's report the comments are suspicious because jobs aren't being created, yet the unemployment rate drops.   Looking at labor force participation, you see that household employment has increased.   But you also need to know how many people dropped out of the labor market all together.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;We have record numbers of discouraged workers and many of them are permanently lost---but thousands will come back into the labor market.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;The data is showing some job gains in some areas---but it isn't happening in all sectors of the economy.   January saw the first increase in manufacturing jobs in over 3 years.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Forward looking indicators show that part-time and contract jobs should improve in the next few months---This isn't as good as landing higher paying full time jobs.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;The labor market will wadddle along for a little bit, because you have create jobs for the previously displaced and the teenagers that are becoming working aged adults---this isn't going to happen for some time.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;&lt;input id="gwProxy" type="hidden"&gt;&lt;!--Session data--&gt;&lt;input onclick="jsCall();" id="jsProxy" type="hidden"&gt;&lt;div id="refHTML"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/5440667314879833095-6063070482817425893?l=unemploymentadvice.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://unemploymentadvice.blogspot.com/feeds/6063070482817425893/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5440667314879833095&amp;postID=6063070482817425893" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5440667314879833095/posts/default/6063070482817425893?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5440667314879833095/posts/default/6063070482817425893?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/UnemploymentStatistics/~3/ib356Hg3VMQ/bank-of-tokyo-mitsubishis-us-economist.html" title="Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi's US Economist on the Unemployment Picture" /><author><name>Tom M</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/14355090527967294216</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://unemploymentadvice.blogspot.com/2010/02/bank-of-tokyo-mitsubishis-us-economist.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;D0AMR3YycCp7ImA9WxBWGE4.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5440667314879833095.post-3278355400738326465</id><published>2010-02-10T14:59:00.005-06:00</published><updated>2010-02-10T15:03:06.898-06:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2010-02-10T15:03:06.898-06:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="St. Louis" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Unemployment Rate" /><title>65 Years of Unemployment Data</title><content type="html">&lt;a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/__V1GJlBadyE/S3MePnlSYnI/AAAAAAAAA-Q/7LUd-RE0iXY/s1600-h/Civilian+Unemployment+Rate+Chart.png"&gt;&lt;img style="margin: 0px auto 10px; display: block; text-align: center; cursor: pointer; width: 320px; height: 192px;" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/__V1GJlBadyE/S3MePnlSYnI/AAAAAAAAA-Q/7LUd-RE0iXY/s320/Civilian+Unemployment+Rate+Chart.png" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5436722428838568562" border="0" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The &lt;a href="http://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/series/UNRATE"&gt;St Louis Fed&lt;/a&gt; publishes regular updates to the Civilian Unemployment Rate.  I thought this chart spanning the ~65 years from post WWII (1945) to today (2010) you can see how recessions have frequently caused large spikes in the unemployment rate.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The spike from the most recent recession is the second highest in the post-war era---That's the bad news.   The good news is that during the past few months the Jobless rate went from over 10% to 9.7%...   Maybe things are starting to improve.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;input id="gwProxy" type="hidden"&gt;&lt;!--Session data--&gt;&lt;input onclick="jsCall();" id="jsProxy" type="hidden"&gt;&lt;div id="refHTML"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/5440667314879833095-3278355400738326465?l=unemploymentadvice.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://unemploymentadvice.blogspot.com/feeds/3278355400738326465/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5440667314879833095&amp;postID=3278355400738326465" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5440667314879833095/posts/default/3278355400738326465?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5440667314879833095/posts/default/3278355400738326465?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/UnemploymentStatistics/~3/iyYj1HNMhsg/65-years-of-unemployment-data.html" title="65 Years of Unemployment Data" /><author><name>Tom M</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/14355090527967294216</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/__V1GJlBadyE/S3MePnlSYnI/AAAAAAAAA-Q/7LUd-RE0iXY/s72-c/Civilian+Unemployment+Rate+Chart.png" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://unemploymentadvice.blogspot.com/2010/02/65-years-of-unemployment-data.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;Dk4BRHk-eip7ImA9WxBWFkU.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5440667314879833095.post-4507486638142824145</id><published>2010-02-08T21:06:00.002-06:00</published><updated>2010-02-08T21:09:15.752-06:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2010-02-08T21:09:15.752-06:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="New York" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Nevada" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Minnesota" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="California" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Michigan" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Unemployment Rate" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Texas" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Ohio" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Florida" /><title>Unemployment Rate by County</title><content type="html">&lt;object width="320" height="265"&gt;&lt;param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/J28tLOpzfpA&amp;amp;hl=en_US&amp;amp;fs=1&amp;amp;"&gt;&lt;param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"&gt;&lt;param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"&gt;&lt;embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/J28tLOpzfpA&amp;amp;hl=en_US&amp;amp;fs=1&amp;amp;" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="320" height="265"&gt;&lt;/embed&gt;&lt;/object&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;According to the U.S. Department of Labor's Bureau of Labor Statistics, there are nearly 30 million people currently unemployed -- that's including those involuntarily working part time and those who want a job, but have given up on trying to find one. In the face of the worst economic upheaval since the Great Depression, millions of Americans are hurting. "&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Decline: The Geography of a Recession," as created by labor writer LaToya Egwuekwe, serves as a vivid representation of just how much. Watch the deteriorating transformation of the U.S. economy from January 2007 -- approximately one year before the start of the recession -- to the most recent unemployment data available today. Original link: &lt;a href="http://www.latoyaegwuekwe.com/geographyofarecession.html"&gt;www.latoyaegwuekwe.com/geographyofarecession.html&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This data was last updated in February 2010.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/5440667314879833095-4507486638142824145?l=unemploymentadvice.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://unemploymentadvice.blogspot.com/feeds/4507486638142824145/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5440667314879833095&amp;postID=4507486638142824145" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5440667314879833095/posts/default/4507486638142824145?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5440667314879833095/posts/default/4507486638142824145?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/UnemploymentStatistics/~3/KsNeI3JZQjQ/unemployment-rate-by-county.html" title="Unemployment Rate by County" /><author><name>Tom M</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/14355090527967294216</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://unemploymentadvice.blogspot.com/2010/02/unemployment-rate-by-county.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;CUENSX4_fCp7ImA9WxBWFkU.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5440667314879833095.post-1906881011646741566</id><published>2010-02-08T20:41:00.003-06:00</published><updated>2010-02-08T20:48:18.044-06:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2010-02-08T20:48:18.044-06:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="jobs" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Unemployment Rate" /><title>More Women Working than Men</title><content type="html">&lt;a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/__V1GJlBadyE/S3DLra4mOaI/AAAAAAAAA-I/L9VUFExKlWM/s1600-h/Percent+of+Women+in+Labor+Force+Chart.png"&gt;&lt;img style="margin: 0px auto 10px; display: block; text-align: center; cursor: pointer; width: 320px; height: 240px;" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/__V1GJlBadyE/S3DLra4mOaI/AAAAAAAAA-I/L9VUFExKlWM/s320/Percent+of+Women+in+Labor+Force+Chart.png" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5436068697047710114" border="0" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;As &lt;a href="http://econompicdata.blogspot.com/2010/02/women-taking-over-workforce.html"&gt;Econompicdata&lt;/a&gt; shows for the first time in US history there are more women with jobs than men.    This is one reason why the current great recession has been called a mancession.   As many industries that have been dominated by males (construction and manufacturing) have been hit quite hard by lay-offs and job-losses, while many industries dominated by women (education and health-care) have not suffered as extreme of a hit to their payrolls.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;For additional reading on the subject, you can check out &lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/06/business/economy/06women.html"&gt;The NY Times&lt;/a&gt; or &lt;a href="http://caseymulligan.blogspot.com/2010/02/women-majority-but-for-how-long.html"&gt;Casey Mulligan's Blog&lt;/a&gt; (he's a professor at the University of Chicago).&lt;br /&gt;&lt;input id="gwProxy" type="hidden"&gt;&lt;!--Session data--&gt;&lt;input onclick="jsCall();" id="jsProxy" type="hidden"&gt;&lt;div id="refHTML"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/5440667314879833095-1906881011646741566?l=unemploymentadvice.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://unemploymentadvice.blogspot.com/feeds/1906881011646741566/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5440667314879833095&amp;postID=1906881011646741566" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5440667314879833095/posts/default/1906881011646741566?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5440667314879833095/posts/default/1906881011646741566?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/UnemploymentStatistics/~3/sacR3X2VD6E/more-women-working-than-men.html" title="More Women Working than Men" /><author><name>Tom M</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/14355090527967294216</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/__V1GJlBadyE/S3DLra4mOaI/AAAAAAAAA-I/L9VUFExKlWM/s72-c/Percent+of+Women+in+Labor+Force+Chart.png" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://unemploymentadvice.blogspot.com/2010/02/more-women-working-than-men.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;CUQMQ3s4eSp7ImA9WxBWE0Q.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5440667314879833095.post-507373045886237364</id><published>2010-02-05T11:58:00.004-06:00</published><updated>2010-02-05T12:09:42.531-06:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2010-02-05T12:09:42.531-06:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="jobs" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Unemployment Rate" /><title>January Jobs Report---Unemployment drops to 9.7%</title><content type="html">&lt;object id="cnbcplayer" classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=9,0,0,0" width="400" height="380"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;param name="type" value="application/x-shockwave-flash"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;param name="allowfullscreen" value="true"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;param name="quality" value="best"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;param name="scale" value="noscale"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;param name="wmode" value="transparent"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;param name="bgcolor" value="#000000"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;param name="salign" value="lt"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;param name="movie" value="http://plus.cnbc.com/rssvideosearch/action/player/id/1405467877/code/cnbcplayershare"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;embed name="cnbcplayer" pluginspage="http://www.macromedia.com/go/getflashplayer" allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" bgcolor="#000000" quality="best" wmode="transparent" scale="noscale" salign="lt" src="http://plus.cnbc.com/rssvideosearch/action/player/id/1405467877/code/cnbcplayershare" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="400" height="380"&gt;&lt;/embed&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/object&gt;&lt;br /&gt;CNBC reports in this 10 minute video clip the January, 2010 jobs report.  The Unemployment rate is at 9.7%.  The unemployment declined because of the benchmark revisions and because more people were finding work.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Annual benchmark revisions show 8.4 million jobs lost since the start of the recession versus 7.2 million prior to the revision.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Rick Santelli commented that,the benchmark revision was in the realm of expectations, and he wants to know how much the labor force shrank / (grew) in the period.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The average work week was higher at 33.3 hours per week versus 33.2 hours per week prior to the report. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Temporary jobs continue to increase, but construction jobs continue to decline.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In February and March, government employment is expected to increase as the census starts its 2010 hiring spree.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Mark Zandi views the decline in unemployment rate confusing, because payroll employment continues to shrink (ADP data), so how could unemployment be improving?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In order to stabilize employment, analysts say 125,000 jobs per month need to be created---However, this past month 20,000 jobs were still destroyed.   While the trend is still improving, things aren't fully positive yet.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/5440667314879833095-507373045886237364?l=unemploymentadvice.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://unemploymentadvice.blogspot.com/feeds/507373045886237364/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5440667314879833095&amp;postID=507373045886237364" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5440667314879833095/posts/default/507373045886237364?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5440667314879833095/posts/default/507373045886237364?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/UnemploymentStatistics/~3/L0_ZYV0EDik/january-jobs-report-unemployment-drops.html" title="January Jobs Report---Unemployment drops to 9.7%" /><author><name>Tom M</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/14355090527967294216</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://unemploymentadvice.blogspot.com/2010/02/january-jobs-report-unemployment-drops.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;A08CR3gzcSp7ImA9WxBWE0w.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5440667314879833095.post-4198768972743365260</id><published>2010-02-04T15:38:00.005-06:00</published><updated>2010-02-04T15:44:26.689-06:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2010-02-04T15:44:26.689-06:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Underemployed" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="jobs" /><title>Trucking Jobs have Dropped During the Recession</title><content type="html">&lt;div&gt;&lt;a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/__V1GJlBadyE/S2s-ahYkY0I/AAAAAAAAA94/pKtOG3CcfKU/s1600-h/2010-Trucking+Jobs.png"&gt;&lt;img id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5434506000711574338" style="DISPLAY: block; MARGIN: 0px auto 10px; WIDTH: 320px; CURSOR: hand; HEIGHT: 198px; TEXT-ALIGN: center" alt="" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/__V1GJlBadyE/S2s-ahYkY0I/AAAAAAAAA94/pKtOG3CcfKU/s320/2010-Trucking+Jobs.png" border="0" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The &lt;a href="http://www.bls.gov/opub/ils/trucking.htm"&gt;&gt;Bureau of Labor Statistics&lt;/a&gt; has recently issued a study that shows how employment in the truck transportation industry has dropped from 1.45 million jobs before 2008 to about 1.25 million trucking jobs by the end of 2009. This decrease of 200,000 drivers is significant not only for the truckers, but also for the manufacturers and merchants that sell the goods that these guys deliver.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/__V1GJlBadyE/S2s_WeOGoAI/AAAAAAAAA-A/A_EJ43hgXxI/s1600-h/truck_chart2.png"&gt;&lt;img id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5434507030654525442" style="DISPLAY: block; MARGIN: 0px auto 10px; WIDTH: 320px; CURSOR: hand; HEIGHT: 198px; TEXT-ALIGN: center" alt="" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/__V1GJlBadyE/S2s_WeOGoAI/AAAAAAAAA-A/A_EJ43hgXxI/s320/truck_chart2.png" border="0" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;You can see in the above chart that the severity of the decline in this recession (Green Line) is much steeper and prolonged than what it was in the prior two recessionary periods.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/5440667314879833095-4198768972743365260?l=unemploymentadvice.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://unemploymentadvice.blogspot.com/feeds/4198768972743365260/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5440667314879833095&amp;postID=4198768972743365260" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5440667314879833095/posts/default/4198768972743365260?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5440667314879833095/posts/default/4198768972743365260?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/UnemploymentStatistics/~3/xgYu2vAf85o/trucking-jobs-have-dropped-during.html" title="Trucking Jobs have Dropped During the Recession" /><author><name>Tom M</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/14355090527967294216</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/__V1GJlBadyE/S2s-ahYkY0I/AAAAAAAAA94/pKtOG3CcfKU/s72-c/2010-Trucking+Jobs.png" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://unemploymentadvice.blogspot.com/2010/02/trucking-jobs-have-dropped-during.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;DEAEQng7eCp7ImA9WxBQGU8.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5440667314879833095.post-1474649311898078919</id><published>2010-01-19T12:39:00.002-06:00</published><updated>2010-01-19T12:45:03.600-06:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2010-01-19T12:45:03.600-06:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="unemployment insurance" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Tier 2" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Economics" /><title>Time Magazine thinks that extended unemployment benefits may increase joblessness</title><content type="html">According to a recent story in &lt;a href="http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1953704,00.html"&gt;Time Magazine, there is "a Limit to Compassion"&lt;/a&gt;.   The article figures that with extending the unemployment benefits for up to 99 weeks, congress and the president actually provides the jobless incentive to wait around for jobs---not taking low-paying jobs or a position that would require you to relocate.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;blockquote style="font-style: italic;"&gt;Because there's evidence that the extensions are only prolonging joblessness. Today's unemployment rate remains high not because of mass layoffs — most of which happened early last year — but mainly because more people are remaining unemployed for longer periods. In academic parlance, the "exit rate" from the unemployment pool is only around 21%, compared with 34% during the last harsh recession, in 1982. &lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/5440667314879833095-1474649311898078919?l=unemploymentadvice.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://unemploymentadvice.blogspot.com/feeds/1474649311898078919/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5440667314879833095&amp;postID=1474649311898078919" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5440667314879833095/posts/default/1474649311898078919?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5440667314879833095/posts/default/1474649311898078919?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/UnemploymentStatistics/~3/1CwldIM80hk/time-magazine-thinks-that-extended.html" title="Time Magazine thinks that extended unemployment benefits may increase joblessness" /><author><name>Tom M</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/14355090527967294216</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://unemploymentadvice.blogspot.com/2010/01/time-magazine-thinks-that-extended.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;C0UFRH49cSp7ImA9WxBQGU8.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5440667314879833095.post-2391434136972776996</id><published>2010-01-19T11:11:00.002-06:00</published><updated>2010-01-19T11:13:35.069-06:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2010-01-19T11:13:35.069-06:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Initial jobless claims" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Unemployment Rate" /><title>Unadjusted Unemployment Data - 2008 vs 2009 vs 2010</title><content type="html">&lt;object width="560" height="340"&gt;&lt;param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/IbAwDmnF5PQ&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1&amp;"&gt;&lt;/param&gt;&lt;param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"&gt;&lt;/param&gt;&lt;param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"&gt;&lt;/param&gt;&lt;embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/IbAwDmnF5PQ&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1&amp;" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="560" height="340"&gt;&lt;/embed&gt;&lt;/object&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This short video shows the unadjusted initial unemployment claims statistics for the United States over the past several years.  It utilizes ribbon charts to compare 2008, 2009 and 2010 to earlier years.  You can see both the seasonality in the unemployment claims as well the big spike up in numbers seen in late 2008 and during all of 2009.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/5440667314879833095-2391434136972776996?l=unemploymentadvice.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://unemploymentadvice.blogspot.com/feeds/2391434136972776996/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5440667314879833095&amp;postID=2391434136972776996" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5440667314879833095/posts/default/2391434136972776996?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5440667314879833095/posts/default/2391434136972776996?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/UnemploymentStatistics/~3/YbUlH5qCpfY/unadjusted-unemployment-data-2008-vs.html" title="Unadjusted Unemployment Data - 2008 vs 2009 vs 2010" /><author><name>Tom M</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/14355090527967294216</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://unemploymentadvice.blogspot.com/2010/01/unadjusted-unemployment-data-2008-vs.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;C04BQXY-eyp7ImA9WxBQFkw.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5440667314879833095.post-5629742241900773373</id><published>2010-01-15T21:16:00.002-06:00</published><updated>2010-01-15T21:19:10.853-06:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2010-01-15T21:19:10.853-06:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="tax" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="unemployment benefit" /><title>Do I pay income taxes on my unemployment income?</title><content type="html">According to the &lt;a href="http://www.irs.gov/taxtopics/tc418.html"&gt;IRS&lt;/a&gt; you better be ready to claim your unemployment income on your 1040 tax forms---What the government gives, the government takes away.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;*****************************************************************&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div style="margin-left: 0.25in;"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Topic 418 - Unemployment Compensation&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;p&gt;Unemployment compensation is includible in gross income. You must report                      unemployment compensation on line 19 of Form 1040, line 13 of Form 1040A,                      or line 3 of Form 1040EZ. However, for 2009, the first $2,400 of unemployment                      compensation is excluded from income and should be excluded from the amount                      reported on your tax return.                   &lt;/p&gt;                   &lt;p&gt;Unemployment compensation generally includes any amounts received under                      the unemployment compensation laws of the United States or of a state. It                      includes state unemployment insurance benefits and benefits paid to you by                      a state or the District of Columbia from the Federal Unemployment Trust Fund.                      It also includes railroad unemployment compensation benefits, disability benefits                      paid as a substitute for unemployment compensation, trade readjustment allowances                      under the Trade Act of 1974, and unemployment assistance under the Disaster                      Relief and Emergency Assistance Act of 1974. Unemployment compensation does                      not include worker's compensation.                   &lt;/p&gt;                   &lt;p&gt;If you received unemployment compensation during the year, you should receive &lt;a href="http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/f1099g.pdf"&gt; Form 1099-G&lt;/a&gt; (PDF) showing the amount you were paid. Any                      unemployment compensation received during the year must be included in your                      income, unless you contributed to the fund. See Below. In addition, for 2009,                      the first $2,400 of unemployment compensation is excluded from gross income.                   &lt;/p&gt;                   &lt;p&gt;If you received unemployment compensation, you may be required to make                      quarterly estimated tax payments. However, you can choose to have federal                      income tax withheld. For more information, refer to &lt;a href="http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/fw4v.pdf"&gt; Form W-4V&lt;/a&gt; (PDF), &lt;i call="gov.irs.xmlbulkcontent.core.link.GetURL"&gt;&lt;em&gt;Voluntary Withholding Request&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/i&gt;.                   &lt;/p&gt;                   &lt;p&gt;Supplemental unemployment benefits received from a company financed fund                      are not considered unemployment compensation for this purpose. These benefits                      are taxable as wages, and are subject to income tax withholding. They may                      be subject to social security and Medicare taxes as well. Supplemental unemployment                      benefits are reported to you on &lt;a href="http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/fw2.pdf"&gt; Form W-2&lt;/a&gt; (PDF). For                      more information about supplemental unemployment benefits, see &lt;a href="http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/p15a.pdf"&gt;Publication 15-A&lt;/a&gt; (PDF) , section 5, page 12.                   &lt;/p&gt;                   &lt;p&gt;Unemployment benefits from a private fund (or, in some cases, public fund)                      to which you voluntarily contribute are taxable only if the amounts you receive                      are more than your total payments into the fund. This taxable amount is not                      unemployment compensation; it is reported as other income on &lt;a href="http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/f1040.pdf"&gt; Form 1040&lt;/a&gt; (PDF).                   &lt;/p&gt;                   &lt;p&gt;For more information, see Unemployment Benefits in &lt;a href="http://www.irs.gov/publications/p525/index.html"&gt;Publication 525&lt;/a&gt;,                      on page 27.                   &lt;/p&gt;                &lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/5440667314879833095-5629742241900773373?l=unemploymentadvice.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://unemploymentadvice.blogspot.com/feeds/5629742241900773373/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5440667314879833095&amp;postID=5629742241900773373" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5440667314879833095/posts/default/5629742241900773373?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5440667314879833095/posts/default/5629742241900773373?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/UnemploymentStatistics/~3/hae458jknvM/do-i-pay-income-taxes-on-my.html" title="Do I pay income taxes on my unemployment income?" /><author><name>Tom M</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/14355090527967294216</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://unemploymentadvice.blogspot.com/2010/01/do-i-pay-income-taxes-on-my.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;DEADQH48eyp7ImA9WxBQEE0.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5440667314879833095.post-841360065814224772</id><published>2010-01-08T21:08:00.002-06:00</published><updated>2010-01-08T21:12:51.073-06:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2010-01-08T21:12:51.073-06:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="unemployment insurance" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Maryland" /><title>Maryland Unemployment Line Busy Signal</title><content type="html">WBAL &lt;a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=esW2Mnmk1Ag"&gt;reports&lt;/a&gt; that thousands of jobless people in Maryland are spending hours on hold, with busy signals or having the system hang up on them.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Baltimore news station's I-team's Barry Simms reports that Maryland doesn't have unemployment offices where people can go to for help---They must use the internet or call the number---For many it becomes a near full time job just to try and file their UI claim.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;DLLR claims that 120,000 Marylanders were collecting unemployment and the plan to improve service levels are to hire an additional 25 people and to upgrade its computer systems.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;input id="gwProxy" type="hidden"&gt;&lt;!--Session data--&gt;&lt;input onclick="jsCall();" id="jsProxy" type="hidden"&gt;&lt;div id="refHTML"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/5440667314879833095-841360065814224772?l=unemploymentadvice.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://unemploymentadvice.blogspot.com/feeds/841360065814224772/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5440667314879833095&amp;postID=841360065814224772" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5440667314879833095/posts/default/841360065814224772?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5440667314879833095/posts/default/841360065814224772?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/UnemploymentStatistics/~3/pJQoLH3cY2g/maryland-unemployment-line-busy-signal.html" title="Maryland Unemployment Line Busy Signal" /><author><name>Tom M</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/14355090527967294216</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://unemploymentadvice.blogspot.com/2010/01/maryland-unemployment-line-busy-signal.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;CkcHRH8-fSp7ImA9WxBRGUo.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5440667314879833095.post-3511966653237710231</id><published>2010-01-08T10:45:00.002-06:00</published><updated>2010-01-08T11:00:35.155-06:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2010-01-08T11:00:35.155-06:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Health Insurance" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="COBRA" /><title>Federal Cobra Subsidy Extended 6 more Months</title><content type="html">&lt;p style="font-weight: bold;" class="storyheadline"&gt;Federal subsidy program for COBRA extended&lt;/p&gt;                                        &lt;span&gt;Thursday, January 7, 2010&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt; —&lt;/span&gt;          &lt;span&gt;Insurance Commissioner Wayne Goodwin announced Tuesday that the federal subsidy program for COBRA coverage for involuntarily terminated workers has been extended.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The extension allows the subsidy to remain in effect for an additional six months, for a total of 15 months worth of subsidy payments. The subsidy pays for 65 percent of the premium for both COBRA and mini-COBRA (see below for mini-COBRA definition) recipients who are involuntarily terminated from their jobs between Sept. 1, 2008 to Feb. 28, 2010. Workers are responsible for paying the remaining 35 percent.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Read the rest of the story at &lt;a href="http://www.thesnaponline.com/local/local_story_008091526.html"&gt;The Snap Online&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;input id="gwProxy" type="hidden"&gt;&lt;!--Session data--&gt;&lt;input onclick="jsCall();" id="jsProxy" type="hidden"&gt;&lt;div id="refHTML"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/5440667314879833095-3511966653237710231?l=unemploymentadvice.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://unemploymentadvice.blogspot.com/feeds/3511966653237710231/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5440667314879833095&amp;postID=3511966653237710231" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5440667314879833095/posts/default/3511966653237710231?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5440667314879833095/posts/default/3511966653237710231?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/UnemploymentStatistics/~3/uGiHsj12rck/federal-cobra-subsidy-extended-6-more.html" title="Federal Cobra Subsidy Extended 6 more Months" /><author><name>Tom M</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/14355090527967294216</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://unemploymentadvice.blogspot.com/2010/01/federal-cobra-subsidy-extended-6-more.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;DkQMRHw9eip7ImA9WxBRGU0.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5440667314879833095.post-3835393904854666915</id><published>2010-01-07T16:40:00.004-06:00</published><updated>2010-01-07T16:46:25.262-06:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2010-01-07T16:46:25.262-06:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Los Angeles" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="California" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="unemployment fund" /><title>California's UI Fund To Run Huge Deficits</title><content type="html">&lt;a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/__V1GJlBadyE/S0ZjDhTMwVI/AAAAAAAAA9I/Sd50Hnuw7P8/s1600-h/California+Unemployment+Insurance+Fund+Deficit+Chart.jpg"&gt;&lt;img style="margin: 0px auto 10px; display: block; text-align: center; cursor: pointer; width: 320px; height: 216px;" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/__V1GJlBadyE/S0ZjDhTMwVI/AAAAAAAAA9I/Sd50Hnuw7P8/s320/California+Unemployment+Insurance+Fund+Deficit+Chart.jpg" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5424131713343996242" border="0" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Click on Chart for a Larger Image&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;How bad are things in the state of California?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Well according to an Unemployment Insurance (UI) Fund forecast issued by California's Employment Development Department (EDD), the fund which is currently about $8 billion underfunded will be over $27 billion in the red by 2011!&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;That's almost $1,000 for every man, woman and child in the state of California---Or almost $2,000 for every worker in the state---It will likely be many many years before CA is able to dig out of this hole.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/5440667314879833095-3835393904854666915?l=unemploymentadvice.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://unemploymentadvice.blogspot.com/feeds/3835393904854666915/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5440667314879833095&amp;postID=3835393904854666915" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5440667314879833095/posts/default/3835393904854666915?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5440667314879833095/posts/default/3835393904854666915?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/UnemploymentStatistics/~3/Tz0hBXqJJvg/californias-ui-fund-to-run-huge.html" title="California's UI Fund To Run Huge Deficits" /><author><name>Tom M</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/14355090527967294216</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/__V1GJlBadyE/S0ZjDhTMwVI/AAAAAAAAA9I/Sd50Hnuw7P8/s72-c/California+Unemployment+Insurance+Fund+Deficit+Chart.jpg" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://unemploymentadvice.blogspot.com/2010/01/californias-ui-fund-to-run-huge.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;CE8BSXc8fCp7ImA9WxBRGU0.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5440667314879833095.post-1538159909706671058</id><published>2010-01-07T16:16:00.003-06:00</published><updated>2010-01-07T16:20:58.974-06:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2010-01-07T16:20:58.974-06:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="unemployment insurance" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Michigan" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="unemployment benefit" /><title>Extended Unemployment Insurance Benefits in Michigan</title><content type="html">&lt;a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/__V1GJlBadyE/S0ZeNni8IdI/AAAAAAAAA9A/m6oViUrtFw8/s1600-h/michigan.gif"&gt;&lt;img style="float:right; margin:0 0 10px 10px;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 320px; height: 298px;" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/__V1GJlBadyE/S0ZeNni8IdI/AAAAAAAAA9A/m6oViUrtFw8/s320/michigan.gif" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5424126389261181394" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;If you're confused by what UI extensions you may be elligible to receive if you're an out of work Michigander, you may want to spend 18 minutes watching this &lt;a href="http://mediasite.mihealth.org/mediasite/Viewer/?peid=3e846111572247038c65eb9886fb5145"&gt;webinar&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It's a pretty dry presentation that explains how after you exhaust your regular benefits you get EUC (Emergency Unemployment Compensation), then EUC-Tier 2, then Extended Benefits (EB).&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Michigan also has plenty of other webcasts for the unemployed worker located &lt;a href="http://www.michigan.gov/uia/0,1607,7-118-53900-219607--,00.html"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;input id="gwProxy" type="hidden"&gt;&lt;!--Session data--&gt;&lt;input onclick="jsCall();" id="jsProxy" type="hidden"&gt;&lt;div id="refHTML"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/5440667314879833095-1538159909706671058?l=unemploymentadvice.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://unemploymentadvice.blogspot.com/feeds/1538159909706671058/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5440667314879833095&amp;postID=1538159909706671058" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5440667314879833095/posts/default/1538159909706671058?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5440667314879833095/posts/default/1538159909706671058?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/UnemploymentStatistics/~3/5_kI9X-BYP0/extended-unemployment-insurance.html" title="Extended Unemployment Insurance Benefits in Michigan" /><author><name>Tom M</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/14355090527967294216</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/__V1GJlBadyE/S0ZeNni8IdI/AAAAAAAAA9A/m6oViUrtFw8/s72-c/michigan.gif" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://unemploymentadvice.blogspot.com/2010/01/extended-unemployment-insurance.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;CEQAQngzfip7ImA9WxBRGU0.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5440667314879833095.post-9020130262715562716</id><published>2010-01-07T16:03:00.003-06:00</published><updated>2010-01-07T16:12:23.686-06:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2010-01-07T16:12:23.686-06:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="New York" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="unemployment insurance" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="unemployment benefit" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="New York City" /><title>How Many Weeks of Unemployment do New Yorkers Qualify For?</title><content type="html">&lt;a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/__V1GJlBadyE/S0ZcODmpo7I/AAAAAAAAA84/lgcpx_FO4sg/s1600-h/New-York-map.jpg"&gt;&lt;img style="margin: 0pt 0pt 10px 10px; float: right; cursor: pointer; width: 320px; height: 277px;" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/__V1GJlBadyE/S0ZcODmpo7I/AAAAAAAAA84/lgcpx_FO4sg/s320/New-York-map.jpg" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5424124197769683890" border="0" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The State of New York realizes that it can be confusing for people to know just how many weeks of unemployment insurance benefits they can get while they are jobless.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;That is why they published this handy &lt;a href="http://www.labor.ny.gov/ui/claimantinfo/Breakdownofadditionalbenefits.shtm"&gt;chart&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href="http://www.labor.ny.gov/ui/claimantinfo/UIBenefitsCalculator.shtm"&gt;calculator&lt;/a&gt; to help you figure out how long the checks will keep coming (as long as you're actively looking for work).&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;You'll need to know the date of your Original Claim (OC).&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:180%;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;How Many weeks of Unemployment Benefits do New Yorkers Get&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;*OC effective May 1, 2006 - May 12, 2008  26 weeks of regular UI&lt;br /&gt; &lt;blockquote&gt;20 weeks of EUC-Tier 1&lt;br /&gt; 13 weeks of EUC-Tier 2&lt;br /&gt; 20 weeks of EB&lt;br /&gt; 14 weeks of EUC&lt;br /&gt;   (13 weeks Tier 3 and 1 week Tier 2)&lt;br /&gt; 6 weeks of EUC - Tier 4&lt;br /&gt; &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;99 weeks total&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;*OC effective May 19, 2008 - Aug. 18, 2008 26 weeks of regular UI&lt;br /&gt; &lt;blockquote&gt;20 weeks of EUC-Tier 1&lt;br /&gt; 13 weeks of EUC-Tier 2&lt;br /&gt; 20 weeks of EB&lt;br /&gt; 14 weeks of EUC&lt;br /&gt;   (13 weeks Tier 3 and 1 week Tier 2)&lt;br /&gt; &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;93 weeks total&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;*OC effective Aug. 25, 2008 - Sept. 8, 2008  26 weeks of regular UI&lt;br /&gt; &lt;blockquote&gt;20 weeks of EUC-Tier 1&lt;br /&gt; 13 weeks of EUC-Tier 2&lt;br /&gt; 17-19 weeks of EB (payable up to 2/28/10)&lt;br /&gt; 14 weeks of EUC (13 weeks Tier 3 and 1 week Tier 2)&lt;br /&gt; &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;73 weeks plus 17-19 weeks of EB based on last payable week &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;*OC effective Sept. 15, 2008 – Sept. 29, 2008 26 weeks of regular UI&lt;br /&gt; &lt;blockquote&gt;20 weeks of EUC - Tier 1&lt;br /&gt; 13 weeks of EUC - Tier 2&lt;br /&gt; 14 weeks of EUC&lt;br /&gt;   (13 weeks Tier 3 and 1 week Tier 2)&lt;br /&gt; 6 weeks of EUC - Tier 4&lt;br /&gt; &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;79 weeks total&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;*OC effective Oct. 6, 2008 – Jan. 5, 2009  26 weeks of regular UI&lt;br /&gt; &lt;blockquote&gt;20 weeks of EUC - Tier 1&lt;br /&gt; 13 weeks of EUC - Tier 2&lt;br /&gt; 14 weeks of EUC&lt;br /&gt;   (13 weeks Tier 3 and 1 week Tier 2)&lt;br /&gt; &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;73 weeks total&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;*OC effective Jan. 12, 2009 - Apr. 6, 2009  26 weeks of regular UI&lt;br /&gt; &lt;blockquote&gt;20 weeks of EUC - Tier 1&lt;br /&gt; 14 weeks of EUC - Tier 2&lt;br /&gt; &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;60 weeks total&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;*OC effective Apr. 13, 2009 - Aug. 17, 2009 26 weeks of regular UI&lt;br /&gt; &lt;blockquote&gt;20 weeks of EUC - Tier 1&lt;br /&gt; &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;46 weeks total&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;*OC effective Aug. 24, 2009 and later: &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt; 26 weeks of regular UI only&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;* An Original Claim's (OC) effective date is the Monday of the week in which the claim is filed.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;UI = Regular Unemployment Insurance Benefits&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;EUC = Emergency Unemployment Compensation&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;EB= Extended Benefits&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;(Note:  This data was accurate as of January 2010, it's possible that as time goes on more extensions are given to each group).&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/5440667314879833095-9020130262715562716?l=unemploymentadvice.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://unemploymentadvice.blogspot.com/feeds/9020130262715562716/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5440667314879833095&amp;postID=9020130262715562716" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5440667314879833095/posts/default/9020130262715562716?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5440667314879833095/posts/default/9020130262715562716?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/UnemploymentStatistics/~3/F7i8etUDnuE/how-many-weeks-of-unemployment-do-new.html" title="How Many Weeks of Unemployment do New Yorkers Qualify For?" /><author><name>Tom M</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/14355090527967294216</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/__V1GJlBadyE/S0ZcODmpo7I/AAAAAAAAA84/lgcpx_FO4sg/s72-c/New-York-map.jpg" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://unemploymentadvice.blogspot.com/2010/01/how-many-weeks-of-unemployment-do-new.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;DUUGRX47eyp7ImA9WxBRF0U.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5440667314879833095.post-7893963000225009731</id><published>2010-01-06T08:08:00.004-06:00</published><updated>2010-01-06T08:13:44.003-06:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2010-01-06T08:13:44.003-06:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="ADP" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="jobs" /><title>ADP Jobs Report shows an Increase in Service Jobs</title><content type="html">This morning ADP reported that overall jobs were down 84,000 last month, but the service sector actually saw an increase in jobs.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Jake at &lt;a href="http://econompicdata.blogspot.com/2010/01/adp-jobs-down-84000-services-jobs-grow.html"&gt;economPic Data&lt;/a&gt; created the chart below that nicely shows how it has been well over a year since the service industry was a net producer of jobs on a month-on-month basis.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Unfortunately, manufacturing has steadily been dropping drops for years &amp;amp; years.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/__V1GJlBadyE/S0SZ5rZM2fI/AAAAAAAAA8w/nkDFh3x22_c/s1600-h/ADP+Jobs+Report+Services+vs+Manufacturing.png"&gt;&lt;img style="margin: 0px auto 10px; display: block; text-align: center; cursor: pointer; width: 320px; height: 240px;" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/__V1GJlBadyE/S0SZ5rZM2fI/AAAAAAAAA8w/nkDFh3x22_c/s320/ADP+Jobs+Report+Services+vs+Manufacturing.png" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5423629067440937458" border="0" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Click on Chart for a Larger Image.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;If you wish to read the entire &lt;a href="http://www.adpemploymentreport.com/pdf/FINAL_Report_December_09.pdf"&gt;ADP December 2009 Jobs report, click here.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/5440667314879833095-7893963000225009731?l=unemploymentadvice.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://unemploymentadvice.blogspot.com/feeds/7893963000225009731/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5440667314879833095&amp;postID=7893963000225009731" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5440667314879833095/posts/default/7893963000225009731?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5440667314879833095/posts/default/7893963000225009731?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/UnemploymentStatistics/~3/q050xFw8W6A/adp-jobs-report-shows-increase-in.html" title="ADP Jobs Report shows an Increase in Service Jobs" /><author><name>Tom M</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/14355090527967294216</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/__V1GJlBadyE/S0SZ5rZM2fI/AAAAAAAAA8w/nkDFh3x22_c/s72-c/ADP+Jobs+Report+Services+vs+Manufacturing.png" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://unemploymentadvice.blogspot.com/2010/01/adp-jobs-report-shows-increase-in.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;C0cFQXc_fSp7ImA9WxBSEEU.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5440667314879833095.post-2552751516892691942</id><published>2009-12-17T14:13:00.002-06:00</published><updated>2009-12-17T14:16:50.945-06:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2009-12-17T14:16:50.945-06:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Initial jobless claims" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Weekly jobless claims" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="unemployment benefit" /><title>New Jobless Claims Worsen</title><content type="html">According to data released by the government today, the Labor Department said that &lt;a href="http://money.cnn.com/2009/12/17/news/economy/jobless_claims/"&gt;480,000 people filed for initial jobless benefits&lt;/a&gt; during the week of December 12th---vs. 473,000 people in the prior week.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Continuing Claims also worsened in the week to 5.186 million people collecting unemployment benefits during the week of 12/5/2009.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/5440667314879833095-2552751516892691942?l=unemploymentadvice.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://unemploymentadvice.blogspot.com/feeds/2552751516892691942/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5440667314879833095&amp;postID=2552751516892691942" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5440667314879833095/posts/default/2552751516892691942?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5440667314879833095/posts/default/2552751516892691942?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/UnemploymentStatistics/~3/Ax_DWZOwzhA/new-jobless-claims-worsen.html" title="New Jobless Claims Worsen" /><author><name>Tom M</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/14355090527967294216</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://unemploymentadvice.blogspot.com/2009/12/new-jobless-claims-worsen.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;DkMEQHc4fCp7ImA9WxBTGU0.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5440667314879833095.post-7533799399938145778</id><published>2009-12-15T12:48:00.005-06:00</published><updated>2009-12-15T13:13:21.934-06:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2009-12-15T13:13:21.934-06:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Minnesota" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="New York" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="California" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="unemployment insurance" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="North Carolina" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Texas" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="unemployment benefit" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Nevada" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Michigan" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Oregon" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Wisconsin" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="New Jersey" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Ohio" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Florida" /><title>What's the Maximum Weekly Unemployment Benefit?</title><content type="html">If you're recently unemployed, you may be wondering what the maximum weekly amount of money that you may be getting from the government.  Fortunately, &lt;a href="http://articles.moneycentral.msn.com/SavingandDebt/LearnToBudget/how-much-jobless-pay-would-you-get.aspx"&gt;MSN Money&lt;/a&gt; published a comparison of how much your UI benefits could be...   Note:  The amount you get depends on the state in which you worked, not the state that you may move to during your jobless time.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Maximum Weekly Unemployment Benefit By State&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;ol&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href="http://unemploymentadvice.blogspot.com/search/label/Alabama"&gt;Alabama&lt;/a&gt; - $255&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Alaska - $370&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href="http://unemploymentadvice.blogspot.com/search/label/Arizona"&gt;Arizona&lt;/a&gt; - $240&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href="http://unemploymentadvice.blogspot.com/search/label/Arkansas"&gt;Arkansas&lt;/a&gt; - $409&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href="http://unemploymentadvice.blogspot.com/search/label/California"&gt;California&lt;/a&gt; - $450&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href="http://unemploymentadvice.blogspot.com/search/label/Colorado"&gt;Colorado&lt;/a&gt; - $475&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href="http://unemploymentadvice.blogspot.com/search/label/Connecticut"&gt;Connecticut&lt;/a&gt; - $519&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href="http://unemploymentadvice.blogspot.com/search/label/Delaware"&gt;Delaware&lt;/a&gt; - $330&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;District of Columbia (Washington DC) - $359&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href="http://unemploymentadvice.blogspot.com/search/label/Florida"&gt;Florida&lt;/a&gt; - $275&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href="http://unemploymentadvice.blogspot.com/search/label/Georgia"&gt;Georgia&lt;/a&gt; - $330&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Hawaii - $545&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Idaho - $362&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href="http://unemploymentadvice.blogspot.com/search/label/Illinois"&gt;Illinois&lt;/a&gt; - $385&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href="http://unemploymentadvice.blogspot.com/search/label/Indiana"&gt;Indiana&lt;/a&gt; - $390&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Iowa - $443&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Kansas - $423&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Kentucky - $415&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Louisiana - $284&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Maine - $496&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Maryland - $380&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Massachusetts - $628&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href="http://unemploymentadvice.blogspot.com/search/label/Michigan"&gt;Michigan&lt;/a&gt; - $365&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href="http://unemploymentadvice.blogspot.com/search/label/Minnesota"&gt;Minnesota&lt;/a&gt; - $566&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Mississippi - $230&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Missouri - $320&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Montana - $407&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Nebraska - $308&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Nevada - $362&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;New Hampshire - $427&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href="http://unemploymentadvice.blogspot.com/search/label/New%20Jersey"&gt;New Jersey&lt;/a&gt; $584&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;New Mexico - $455&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href="http://unemploymentadvice.blogspot.com/search/label/New%20York"&gt;New York&lt;/a&gt; - $405&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href="http://unemploymentadvice.blogspot.com/search/label/North%20Carolina"&gt;North Carolina&lt;/a&gt; - $494&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;North Dakota - $385&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href="http://unemploymentadvice.blogspot.com/search/label/Ohio"&gt;Ohio&lt;/a&gt; - $372&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Oklahoma - $392&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Oregon - $482&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href="http://unemploymentadvice.blogspot.com/search/label/Pennsylvania"&gt;Pennsylvania&lt;/a&gt; - $539&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Rhode Island - $528&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;South Carolina - $326&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;South Dakota - $285&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Tennessee - $275&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href="http://unemploymentadvice.blogspot.com/search/label/Texas"&gt;Texas&lt;/a&gt; - $378&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Utah - $444&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Vermont - $409&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Virgina - $378&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Washington - $541&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;West Virginia - $424&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href="http://unemploymentadvice.blogspot.com/search/label/Wisconsin"&gt;Wisconsin&lt;/a&gt; - $363&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Wyoming - $387&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ol&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;span&gt;The amount of money received during Tier 2 and Tier 3 payouts are the same as what is received during the first phase of unemployment.  The numbers above do not include the extra $25/week that Obama approved, so your checks may actually be slightly higher, as long as the stimulus plan is still in affect.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;input id="gwProxy" type="hidden"&gt;&lt;!--Session data--&gt;&lt;input onclick="jsCall();" id="jsProxy" type="hidden"&gt;&lt;div id="refHTML"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;input id="gwProxy" type="hidden"&gt;&lt;!--Session data--&gt;&lt;input onclick="jsCall();" id="jsProxy" type="hidden"&gt;&lt;div id="refHTML"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/5440667314879833095-7533799399938145778?l=unemploymentadvice.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://unemploymentadvice.blogspot.com/feeds/7533799399938145778/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5440667314879833095&amp;postID=7533799399938145778" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5440667314879833095/posts/default/7533799399938145778?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5440667314879833095/posts/default/7533799399938145778?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/UnemploymentStatistics/~3/ou1Y8glStMM/whats-maximum-weekly-unemployment.html" title="What's the Maximum Weekly Unemployment Benefit?" /><author><name>Tom M</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/14355090527967294216</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://unemploymentadvice.blogspot.com/2009/12/whats-maximum-weekly-unemployment.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;DEcBQ307eCp7ImA9WxBTFEs.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5440667314879833095.post-7405590496111543262</id><published>2009-12-10T11:20:00.002-06:00</published><updated>2009-12-10T11:27:32.300-06:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2009-12-10T11:27:32.300-06:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="unemployment insurance" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="California" /><title>California Computer Glitch Prevents 111,000 Unemployment Checks from being Issued</title><content type="html">&lt;object id="otvPlayer" classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="600" height="368" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"&gt;&lt;param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always" /&gt;&lt;param name="allowNetworking" value="all" /&gt;&lt;param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /&gt;&lt;param name="src" value="http://cdn.abclocal.go.com/static/flash/embeddedPlayer/swf/otvEmLoader.swf?version=&amp;amp;station=kgo&amp;amp;section=&amp;amp;mediaId=7154588&amp;amp;cdnRoot=http://cdn.abclocal.go.com&amp;amp;webRoot=http://abclocal.go.com&amp;amp;site=" /&gt;&lt;param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /&gt;&lt;embed id="otvPlayer" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="600" height="368" src="http://cdn.abclocal.go.com/static/flash/embeddedPlayer/swf/otvEmLoader.swf?version=&amp;amp;station=kgo&amp;amp;section=&amp;amp;mediaId=7154588&amp;amp;cdnRoot=http://cdn.abclocal.go.com&amp;amp;webRoot=http://abclocal.go.com&amp;amp;site=" allowfullscreen="true" allownetworking="all" allowscriptaccess="always"&gt;&lt;/embed&gt;&lt;/object&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;California's Unemployment Office (EDD) has a computer glitch that is preventing unemployment checks from going to 111,000 out of work Californians.   There's too many unemployed Californians for the 30 year old computer system (Even though they were given funds in 2002 to upgrade the departments IT system).&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Hat tip to &lt;a href="http://unemploymentality.com/2009/12/oh-edd-how-you-make-people-hate-thee/"&gt;Unemploymentality&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/5440667314879833095-7405590496111543262?l=unemploymentadvice.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://unemploymentadvice.blogspot.com/feeds/7405590496111543262/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5440667314879833095&amp;postID=7405590496111543262" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5440667314879833095/posts/default/7405590496111543262?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5440667314879833095/posts/default/7405590496111543262?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/UnemploymentStatistics/~3/xekvM6NeEtI/california-computer-glitch-prevents.html" title="California Computer Glitch Prevents 111,000 Unemployment Checks from being Issued" /><author><name>Tom M</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/14355090527967294216</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://unemploymentadvice.blogspot.com/2009/12/california-computer-glitch-prevents.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;DkMMRX48eCp7ImA9WxBTFEs.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5440667314879833095.post-1325483169275321679</id><published>2009-12-10T10:58:00.002-06:00</published><updated>2009-12-10T11:01:24.070-06:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2009-12-10T11:01:24.070-06:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="education" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="College" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Unemployment Rate" /><title>New College Graduates Having a Tough Time Finding Work</title><content type="html">&lt;object width="425" height="344"&gt;&lt;param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/jKfwdCBqLTM&amp;amp;hl=en_US&amp;amp;fs=1&amp;amp;"&gt;&lt;param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"&gt;&lt;param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"&gt;&lt;embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/jKfwdCBqLTM&amp;amp;hl=en_US&amp;amp;fs=1&amp;amp;" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"&gt;&lt;/embed&gt;&lt;/object&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This Channel One story reports how recent graduates from college are having a tough time finding work.   Just 5 years ago the unemployment rate for college graduates age 20 - 24 was just over 2%.   Today it is almost 10%---And many more grads are forced to work jobs that don't match their major....   And Sadly, many students graduate with tens of thousands of dollars in student loans---consequently, they boomerang back into their parents' home.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/5440667314879833095-1325483169275321679?l=unemploymentadvice.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://unemploymentadvice.blogspot.com/feeds/1325483169275321679/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5440667314879833095&amp;postID=1325483169275321679" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5440667314879833095/posts/default/1325483169275321679?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5440667314879833095/posts/default/1325483169275321679?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/UnemploymentStatistics/~3/lM4Wt74mTEs/new-college-graduates-having-tough-time.html" title="New College Graduates Having a Tough Time Finding Work" /><author><name>Tom M</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/14355090527967294216</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://unemploymentadvice.blogspot.com/2009/12/new-college-graduates-having-tough-time.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;CUAGQ3kzeCp7ImA9WxBTFEs.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5440667314879833095.post-3522850528082064124</id><published>2009-12-10T10:45:00.004-06:00</published><updated>2009-12-10T10:48:42.780-06:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2009-12-10T10:48:42.780-06:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Underemployed" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="jobs" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Unemployment Rate" /><title>Who is (or isn't) Counted as Unemployed?</title><content type="html">&lt;object width="425" height="344"&gt;&lt;param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/Ulu3SCAmeBA&amp;amp;color1=0xb1b1b1&amp;amp;color2=0xcfcfcf&amp;amp;hl=en_US&amp;amp;feature=player_embedded&amp;amp;fs=1"&gt;&lt;param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"&gt;&lt;param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always"&gt;&lt;embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/Ulu3SCAmeBA&amp;amp;color1=0xb1b1b1&amp;amp;color2=0xcfcfcf&amp;amp;hl=en_US&amp;amp;feature=player_embedded&amp;amp;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" width="425" height="344"&gt;&lt;/embed&gt;&lt;/object&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This little 2 minute video does a good job in explaining how the Bureau of Labor Statistics measures who is Unemployed, who is not in labor market, who is marginally in the labor market and who is working part time for economic reasons.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Only people who are "Unemployed" are counted in the (10%) unemployment rate.   The other 3 categories may or may not be included in the U-6 Broader measurement of unemployment (~17%).  The video pokes fun that the government would rather have the public and media focus on the smaller number in order to keep optimism high.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/5440667314879833095-3522850528082064124?l=unemploymentadvice.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://unemploymentadvice.blogspot.com/feeds/3522850528082064124/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5440667314879833095&amp;postID=3522850528082064124" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5440667314879833095/posts/default/3522850528082064124?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5440667314879833095/posts/default/3522850528082064124?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/UnemploymentStatistics/~3/5Vt3Ja28fb4/who-is-or-isnt-counted-as-unemployed.html" title="Who is (or isn't) Counted as Unemployed?" /><author><name>Tom M</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/14355090527967294216</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://unemploymentadvice.blogspot.com/2009/12/who-is-or-isnt-counted-as-unemployed.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;CkEDSXg_eyp7ImA9WxBTE0o.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5440667314879833095.post-1925438679946114698</id><published>2009-12-09T08:53:00.002-06:00</published><updated>2009-12-09T08:57:58.643-06:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2009-12-09T08:57:58.643-06:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Unemployment Rate" /><title>High Unemployment Makes People Fatter?</title><content type="html">According to the &lt;a href="http://www.chicagotribune.com/travel/chi-tc-biz-weight-1208-1209-dec09,0,323003.story"&gt;Chicago Tribune&lt;/a&gt;, the Great Recession has caused people to start eating worse---People without jobs have to buy more processed foods and less fresh foods, and those with jobs are having to work more (forgoing trips to the gym.)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Consequently, in the last year the rate of Obesity has gone up 1 percentage point to 26.4%.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;*******************************************************&lt;br /&gt;Personally, I don't quite believe that there is a cause &amp;amp; effect relationship here.   This is because, in my own anecdotal conversations, the unemployed have discovered the gym in their down-time and according to stats, hours worked each week has actually gone down in the last year...  My guess is that it's just the continuation of the trend that Americans are getting fatter.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;input id="gwProxy" type="hidden"&gt;&lt;!--Session data--&gt;&lt;input onclick="jsCall();" id="jsProxy" type="hidden"&gt;&lt;div id="refHTML"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/5440667314879833095-1925438679946114698?l=unemploymentadvice.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://unemploymentadvice.blogspot.com/feeds/1925438679946114698/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5440667314879833095&amp;postID=1925438679946114698" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5440667314879833095/posts/default/1925438679946114698?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5440667314879833095/posts/default/1925438679946114698?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/UnemploymentStatistics/~3/kaJwKFZRKl0/high-unemployment-makes-people-fatter.html" title="High Unemployment Makes People Fatter?" /><author><name>Tom M</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/14355090527967294216</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://unemploymentadvice.blogspot.com/2009/12/high-unemployment-makes-people-fatter.html</feedburner:origLink></entry></feed>
