<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?><rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:blogger="http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008" xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:openSearch="http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0/" xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0" version="2.0"><channel><atom:id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1284392475241895935</atom:id><lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Sep 2024 11:30:26 +0000</lastBuildDate><category>Landlord</category><category>leases</category><category>lawyers</category><category>administration</category><category>insolvency</category><category>law firms</category><category>credit crunch</category><category>tenant</category><category>legal fees</category><category>recession</category><category>clients</category><category>CVA</category><category>institutional lease</category><category>risk</category><category>BPF</category><category>Commercial Lease Code</category><category>Goldacre</category><category>Government</category><category>administration expense</category><category>administrator</category><category>client care</category><category>development</category><category>real estate</category><category>recovery</category><category>retailer</category><category>Blacks Leisure</category><category>JJB</category><category>Landlord and Tenant (Covenants) Act</category><category>costs</category><category>developer</category><category>fairness</category><category>legislation</category><category>rent</category><category>service charge</category><category>British Chambers of Commerce</category><category>CRE</category><category>Good Harvest</category><category>The Lawyer</category><category>assignment</category><category>creditors volunatary arrangement</category><category>drafting</category><category>offshore</category><category>outsourcing</category><category>reform</category><category>restructuring</category><category>tax</category><category>AGA</category><category>Bank of England</category><category>Carbon Footprint</category><category>Carbon Reduction Commitment</category><category>FRI</category><category>Focus DIY</category><category>HMV</category><category>Peacocks</category><category>Property</category><category>Property Week</category><category>RPI</category><category>Spending Review 2010</category><category>VAT</category><category>assignee</category><category>associates</category><category>authorised guarantee agreement</category><category>construction industry</category><category>expectation</category><category>financial meltdown</category><category>green leases</category><category>house prices</category><category>inflation</category><category>interest rates</category><category>investment</category><category>joint venture</category><category>mortgagee</category><category>planning</category><category>privity of contract</category><category>repair</category><category>repossession</category><category>AIFM</category><category>BCC</category><category>CML</category><category>CPI</category><category>CRC</category><category>City of London</category><category>Clinton Cards</category><category>Coldblood</category><category>Comet</category><category>DCLG</category><category>Death Star</category><category>Denial of Service</category><category>Department of Communities and Local Government</category><category>FSA</category><category>Ft.com</category><category>Hammerson</category><category>IFA</category><category>JFS</category><category>Jew</category><category>Jewish</category><category>Julian Assange</category><category>La Senza</category><category>LegalEagleMHM</category><category>OSCRE</category><category>Orthodox Judaism</category><category>PISCES</category><category>Princess Leia</category><category>Progressive judaism</category><category>Property Rental Business</category><category>REIT</category><category>SDLT</category><category>Southern Cross</category><category>Star Wars</category><category>Stylo</category><category>TUPE</category><category>TheLawyer.com</category><category>Westfield</category><category>Wikileaks</category><category>agreements</category><category>anti-avoidance</category><category>asset management</category><category>banks</category><category>blame</category><category>capital allowances</category><category>care homes</category><category>citizenship</category><category>commission</category><category>competition law</category><category>critical illnes</category><category>deadline</category><category>deficit</category><category>director</category><category>discrimination</category><category>downturn</category><category>employment law</category><category>extradition</category><category>foreclosure</category><category>guarantee</category><category>guarantor</category><category>in possession</category><category>independent financial advisor</category><category>insolvent</category><category>insured risks</category><category>international</category><category>legal process outsourcing</category><category>life insurance</category><category>media</category><category>pensions</category><category>power of sale</category><category>precedent</category><category>privity of estate</category><category>receiver</category><category>religion</category><category>sale and leaseback</category><category>service</category><category>social media</category><category>stress</category><category>structure</category><category>thelegalbratlawg</category><category>trainees</category><category>uninsured risks</category><category>unions</category><title>UKLegal Eagle - The legal blogger of the UK</title><description>Blogs on law, property and life - not all lawyers are dull and bookish!</description><link>http://uklegaleagle.blogspot.com/</link><managingEditor>noreply@blogger.com (Anonymous)</managingEditor><generator>Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>59</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>25</openSearch:itemsPerPage><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1284392475241895935.post-2191978001208657410</guid><pubDate>Fri, 27 Dec 2013 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2013-12-27T09:00:06.167+00:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">fairness</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">law firms</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">lawyers</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">legal fees</category><title>The great fixed fee debate - the lawyer's argument</title><atom:summary type="text">

It has been quite a while since I last blogged and even
longer since I blogged about a potentially controversial subject so why not
kill two birds with one stone.&amp;nbsp; 2013 has
been a year of two halves for the legal profession.&amp;nbsp; The first half of the year firms had it rough
and indeed some did not make it through the whole year as a result.&amp;nbsp; The second half was much more positive
</atom:summary><link>http://uklegaleagle.blogspot.com/2013/12/the-great-fixed-fee-debate-lawyers.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Anonymous)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" height="72" url="http://i809.photobucket.com/albums/zz18/weddingday_2010/Wedding%20Day/th_calendar.gif" width="72"/><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1284392475241895935.post-4028704931765310062</guid><pubDate>Tue, 04 Jun 2013 07:45:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2013-06-04T08:45:01.040+01:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">administration</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">CRE</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">insolvency</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Landlord</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">retailer</category><title>Sweet Dreams for trade creditors but nightmares for Landlords</title><atom:summary type="text">The news (Private equity firm pays Dreams' creditors) that Sun European has paid 75p in the £1 to trade creditors of Dreams, which it acquired from the hands of administrators in March is great news for those creditors.&amp;nbsp; But unfortunately the story for landlords is not so good - no such pay out for them.&amp;nbsp; 

The commercial logic is obvious - in order to continue trading Dreams needs its </atom:summary><link>http://uklegaleagle.blogspot.com/2013/06/sweet-dreams-for-trade-creditors-but.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Anonymous)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1284392475241895935.post-5373556396466640602</guid><pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2012 12:30:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2012-11-06T21:48:55.303+00:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">administration</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">administrator</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">blame</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Comet</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">media</category><title>Comet, explosive headlines and blame</title><atom:summary type="text">There are a number of stories which caught my eye in respect of Comet going into administration.&amp;nbsp; They appeared in many papers and on-line.&amp;nbsp; I am linking to the Telegraph versions of two of them simply because there is no pay wall and they are easy to find (thanks to The Telegraph for being so helpful).&amp;nbsp; The stories are:

"Landlords hit out at Comet for failing to disclose finances</atom:summary><link>http://uklegaleagle.blogspot.com/2012/11/comet-explosive-headlines-and-blame.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Anonymous)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1284392475241895935.post-8291825844680034986</guid><pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 17:02:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2012-05-10T18:02:57.239+01:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">administration</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">BPF</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">creditors volunatary arrangement</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">CVA</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">fairness</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Goldacre</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">insolvency</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Landlord</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">leases</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">restructuring</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">retailer</category><title>BPF's "Taking the Profit" - extracting maximum value</title><atom:summary type="text">The British Property Federation (BPF) is an organisation which represents Landlords.&amp;nbsp; Therefore it is an organisation which is important to me because it is important to my clients.&amp;nbsp; It recently launched its "Taking the Profit" campaign.&amp;nbsp; The target of that campaign is the use of administration particularly in the retail sector as a route to turning a distressed business into a </atom:summary><link>http://uklegaleagle.blogspot.com/2012/05/bpfs-taking-profit-extracting-maximum.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Anonymous)</author><thr:total>2</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1284392475241895935.post-7457794522338800725</guid><pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2012 14:58:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2012-03-28T16:00:41.518+01:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">administration</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">administration expense</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">administrator</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Goldacre</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Landlord</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">leases</category><title>All that glitters is not Goldacre</title><atom:summary type="text">In January 2010 I blogged on a very recent decision called Goldacre (Offices) Limited -v- Nortel Networks UK Limited (in administration) [2009] EWHC 3389 (Ch.).&amp;nbsp; In November of the same year I picked up on a Scottish case (Cheshire West and Chester Borough Council -v- Springfield Retail Limited (in administration)) in which the decision in Goldacre was applied and certain parts clarified.
</atom:summary><link>http://uklegaleagle.blogspot.com/2012/03/all-that-glitters-is-not-goldacre.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Anonymous)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1284392475241895935.post-9221771899752595278</guid><pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2012 11:06:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2012-03-07T11:06:28.600+00:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">BPF</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Commercial Lease Code</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">institutional lease</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">investment</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Landlord and Tenant (Covenants) Act</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">leases</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">privity of contract</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">real estate</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">risk</category><title>Game-over for UK commercial real estate investment?</title><atom:summary type="text">It's MIPIM week and whilst colleagues and contacts are wining, dining and networking on the shores of the Meditteranean, I sit here pondering whether we may be witnessing the end of the UK as an attractive place to invest in commercial real estate.&amp;nbsp; With headlines such as:


"James Dyson calls for looser employment laws and shorter leases"
it is easy to see that the established UK form of </atom:summary><link>http://uklegaleagle.blogspot.com/2012/03/game-over-for-uk-commercial-real-estate.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Anonymous)</author><thr:total>2</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1284392475241895935.post-7432679134482822179</guid><pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 16:09:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2012-02-22T16:09:14.733+00:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">administration</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">administration expense</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">CRE</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Peacocks</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">real estate</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">restructuring</category><title>Peacocks sold: Seduction again?</title><atom:summary type="text">
Those familiar with my blog will remember my relatively recent blog entitled Blacks and La Senza: Agression v Seduction.&amp;nbsp; Today we are met with the news that Peacocks has finally been sold out of administratio to Edinburgh Woollen Mill.&amp;nbsp; This is good news, especially for the 6,000 people whose jobs have been saved and the 338 landlords whose stores will remain open.&amp;nbsp; It is less </atom:summary><link>http://uklegaleagle.blogspot.com/2012/02/peacocks-sold-seduction-again.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Anonymous)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" height="72" url="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjLJZeiVQ_IKTLRwWX9Do52OKIMBoQ9PRK5i2moGaT23tmLcEqZV8Kq-_LK804K83xArbBSM_Qk0f3DUZdhxahTgjWxgU9dJr-ktnsU8D0A7gfRFYu5UpoSPIN5uhqz_YyEK7FiKgS80gk/s72-c/peacocks.jpg" width="72"/><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1284392475241895935.post-8401086172651375736</guid><pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 14:16:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2012-02-17T14:19:08.295+00:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">asset management</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">CRE</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">OSCRE</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">PISCES</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">real estate</category><title>OSCRE: Just for the geeks or time for the lawyers to get involved?</title><atom:summary type="text">
On 24 January 2012&amp;nbsp;I attended a symposium in London to discuss trying to push forward at a greater rate the implementation of the OSCRE standard and its adoption in the Real Estate community.&amp;nbsp; This is not a new path and many will remember the unsuccessful attempts at doing this no more than 10 years ago with PISCES.&amp;nbsp; In fact OSCRE is a sort of successor to PISCES.&amp;nbsp; It is the </atom:summary><link>http://uklegaleagle.blogspot.com/2012/02/oscre-just-for-geeks-or-time-for.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Anonymous)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1284392475241895935.post-2912920019814940670</guid><pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 10:10:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2012-01-17T10:10:47.897+00:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">administration</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">banks</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">downturn</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Government</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">insolvent</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Peacocks</category><title>Damned if you do . . . damned if you don&amp;#39;t</title><atom:summary type="text">

Reading earlier today the pressure that is being placed on RBS in particular to agree to debt restructuring and help save Peacocks from administration I couldn't help but think how perverse the world is.&amp;nbsp; I am not a fan of the mistakes made by big banks which led to the collapse of the financial world as we knew it.&amp;nbsp; It has left one hell of a mess and the tax payer as owner of a </atom:summary><link>http://uklegaleagle.blogspot.com/2012/01/damned-if-you-do-damned-if-you-don.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Anonymous)</author><thr:total>2</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1284392475241895935.post-1326773367590217447</guid><pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 18:10:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2012-01-11T10:17:35.064+00:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">administration</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">administration expense</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">administrator</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Blacks Leisure</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Goldacre</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">insolvency</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">La Senza</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Landlord</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">leases</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">recession</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">retailer</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">tenant</category><title>Blacks and La Senza: Aggression vs Seduction?</title><atom:summary type="text">Yesterday saw the first of what will most likely be a wave of pre-pack administrations of high street names when both Blacks Leisure and La Senza went into administration and immediately thereafter their businesses (or at least the profitable parts of it) were sold to willing buyers.&amp;nbsp; Pre-pack administrations have come in for a lot of criticism on the basis that they often, if not always, </atom:summary><link>http://uklegaleagle.blogspot.com/2012/01/blacks-and-la-senza-might-vs-seduction.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Anonymous)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total><georss:featurename>City of London, London EC4R 9HA, UK</georss:featurename><georss:point>51.5091936 -0.0868681</georss:point><georss:box>51.5067231 -0.0918036 51.511664100000004 -0.081932600000000008</georss:box></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1284392475241895935.post-2582286458126123400</guid><pubDate>Sun, 01 Jan 2012 12:01:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2012-01-01T12:03:24.276+00:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">administration</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">CVA</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Goldacre</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Landlord</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">leases</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Property</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">recession</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">recovery</category><title>Retail 2012 – a showdown between administrators and landlords?</title><atom:summary type="text">A very experienced insolvency practitioner who has acted as administrator on some of the most high profile insolvencies of well known British retailers recently mentioned to a colleague that:

“The main problem facing retailers today is that rents are too high.&amp;nbsp; Landlords will need to accept that if they want their businesses to survive they will need to reduce significantly the rents </atom:summary><link>http://uklegaleagle.blogspot.com/2012/01/retail-2012-showdown-between.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Anonymous)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" height="72" url="http://lh3.ggpht.com/-4tTfnvlU4rI/TwBLLJiKsJI/AAAAAAAACvQ/2NC-QyjfQfc/s72-c/wlEmoticon-winkingsmile%25255B2%25255D.png?imgmax=800" width="72"/><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1284392475241895935.post-2967403927825417482</guid><pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2011 08:30:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2011-11-15T08:30:01.872+00:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">drafting</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">institutional lease</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Landlord</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">law firms</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">lawyers</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">leases</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">precedent</category><title>On-line precedents: Help or hindrance?</title><atom:summary type="text">The &amp;nbsp;internet has brought many benefits to lawyers and particularly to firms who wish to avoid (or cannot justify) the employment of a Knowledge Development Lawyer (aka a Professional Support Lawyer). Whereas previously in order to keep up with the latest legal developments one had to subscribe to countless hard copy journals; constantly receive updates from publishers; then spend time </atom:summary><link>http://uklegaleagle.blogspot.com/2011/11/on-line-precedents-help-or-hindrance.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Anonymous)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" height="72" url="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEj0xsCu16xiDn8HE4fXa0aw5Hf20vNkwpen6EDbcXn3-Yvd2QDRWYG09uDepBbgUpLkwHJLueRTC2jNctc-NPYNfTcxa4UszMx83YjtU3fVTWeK3clAQakRDpT416y8xcpYjwWk8u6JM3w/s72-c/107833650_5f3f9908dc_m.jpg" width="72"/><thr:total>2</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1284392475241895935.post-7258430848818543517</guid><pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2011 16:11:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2011-09-01T17:11:42.937+01:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">care homes</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">credit crunch</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">leases</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">recession</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">reform</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">sale and leaseback</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Southern Cross</category><title>In defence of sale and leasebacks post Southern Cross</title><atom:summary type="text">The Southern Cross collapse has cast a very strong spotlight on the use of sale and leasebacks in the care home industry and in property heavy businesses in general. Southern Cross is not the first well known name to collapse with a sale and leaseback business model; remember Woolworths? Or going back further the Forte group? But, whilst all these collapsed entities share a common theme in having</atom:summary><link>http://uklegaleagle.blogspot.com/2011/09/in-defence-of-sale-and-leasebacks-post.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Anonymous)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1284392475241895935.post-5099277727501953313</guid><pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2011 10:22:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2011-08-12T11:22:09.037+01:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">client care</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">clients</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">costs</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Death Star</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">drafting</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">lawyers</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">legal fees</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Princess Leia</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Star Wars</category><title>Drafting advice . . . from Princess Leia</title><atom:summary type="text">I enjoy a bit of sci-fi every now and again and sometimes think that much can be learned from the sage advice of Yoda and friends ... well not really but it can be fun imaging how Yoda would dispense legal advice:

"Enter into that contract will you hmm? Difficult to see the future is. Trust him I do not!"However, when recently remembering some of Princess Leia's appearances (stop thinking bikini</atom:summary><link>http://uklegaleagle.blogspot.com/2011/08/drafting-advice-from-princess-leia.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Anonymous)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1284392475241895935.post-6580875808402683582</guid><pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2011 20:11:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2011-07-27T21:54:17.475+01:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">AGA</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">assignee</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">assignment</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">authorised guarantee agreement</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Good Harvest</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Landlord</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Landlord and Tenant (Covenants) Act</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">leases</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">tenant</category><title>“Good Harvest” now been tithed?</title><atom:summary type="text">The Court of Appeal today issued its judgment in K/S Victoria Street v House of Fraser (Stores Management) Ltd &amp;amp; Ors [2011] EWCA Civ 904 (27 July 2011).&amp;nbsp; Some might call this case “son of Good Harvest” and it was the Court of Appeal’s first chance to consider the decision made by Mr J Newey in Good Harvest Partnership LLP v Centaur Services Ltd.&amp;nbsp; Those of you who have been reading </atom:summary><link>http://uklegaleagle.blogspot.com/2011/07/good-harvest-now-been-tithed.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Anonymous)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1284392475241895935.post-4430994521912649055</guid><pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2011 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2011-05-25T21:37:01.313+01:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">client care</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">clients</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">law firms</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">leases</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">legal fees</category><title>My computer might have broadband but my brain is still on dial-up</title><atom:summary type="text">I was chatting with a partner of mine last week who has been in practice for nearly 40 years. He made a comment which highlights a major issue facing lawyers the world over:
"Whilst the speed with which we can send and receive documents has increased thanks to the internet, the speed with which we can review them has not."We now live in an instant society. Everything is "on-demand". Modern </atom:summary><link>http://uklegaleagle.blogspot.com/2011/05/my-computer-might-have-broadband-but-my.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Anonymous)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1284392475241895935.post-1885535040376687776</guid><pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2011 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2011-04-05T07:00:08.099+01:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">competition law</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Landlord</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">leases</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">legislation</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">retailer</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">risk</category><title>Changes to Competition Law: An end to "good estate management"?</title><atom:summary type="text">Many thanks to Adrian Magnus, a partner in BLP's EU and Competition Law practice for his input in this blog.

From 6 April 2011, the Chapter I Prohibition&amp;nbsp;under the Competition Act 1998 will apply to land agreements.&amp;nbsp; This might come as a surprise to a lot of people.&amp;nbsp; What on earth does competition law have to do with the ownership of land and why have land agreements hitherto been</atom:summary><link>http://uklegaleagle.blogspot.com/2011/04/changes-to-competition-law-end-to-good.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Anonymous)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" height="72" url="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhFBSUEz-M2tgpkMlgU49d5RVKRD3bWf_70r76x1IXJ1ukJZCoY4oVo5u08n0V3Qmn_24CzMesj972aloSTvIZqyoUDCMwZPjDC2zRHSv18TAlpn3UngZ8mgOlTHDL3qGjc817WRy7Xhyphenhyphen8/s72-c/london-tightrope-566173-o.jpg" width="72"/><thr:total>1</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1284392475241895935.post-9071809384723166243</guid><pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2011 15:00:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2011-03-25T15:14:12.399+00:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">agreements</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">drafting</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">lawyers</category><title>Suits you, sir: The art of bespoke drafting</title><atom:summary type="text">Almost a month ago&amp;nbsp;I wrote&amp;nbsp;a blog entitled "Transactional Law: a bit like being a London cabbie".&amp;nbsp; Recently I have been involved in a transaction where I felt like a cabbie with a passenger constantly changing its mind as to where he wanted to get to.&amp;nbsp; This was&amp;nbsp;an unusal transaction requiring some pretty bespoke drafting which in turn got me thinking about how one should </atom:summary><link>http://uklegaleagle.blogspot.com/2011/03/suits-you-sir-art-of-bespoke-drafting.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Anonymous)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1284392475241895935.post-4820120031101892373</guid><pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2011 10:00:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2011-03-01T10:23:26.966+00:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">clients</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">expectation</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">lawyers</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">LegalEagleMHM</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">trainees</category><title>Transactional law: A bit like being a London cabbie</title><atom:summary type="text">This blog was encouraged/requested by LegalEagleMHM and is being co-hosted on her fantastic blog : Diary of a Diploma in Legal Practice student&amp;nbsp;which contains many thought-provoking and inciteful blogs and the latest of which on "What makes a 'great' lawyer and do clients want 'greatness' or savings?"&amp;nbsp;clearly shows someone thinking about the actual facts of the job.

Every six months we</atom:summary><link>http://uklegaleagle.blogspot.com/2011/03/transactional-law-bit-like-being-london.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Anonymous)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" height="72" url="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjhrjqsklHA8ICw6rAFXak6CcciGZgDCYvzQ2HzS47PuW-Eg8E9MTAvN1MenHLbnb6Fybq2Af8xtcJDntQSEEkXkmItKd6jt-T6-fAzJ2KxY3OR8y6-t4VQAFOZj0LheUFaRIc04b94cNQ/s72-c/graph.jpg" width="72"/><thr:total>3</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1284392475241895935.post-440307644460042725</guid><pubDate>Mon, 21 Feb 2011 19:18:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2011-02-21T22:22:48.376+00:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">CVA</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">JJB</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Landlord</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">tenant</category><title>JJB proposed CVA: Will it succeed?</title><atom:summary type="text">A colleague has just sent to me a copy of the announcement by JJB regarding its proposed CVAs.&amp;nbsp; Only a month ago I wrote a blog regarding the possibility of HMV proposing a CVA which contained some advice for Landlords.&amp;nbsp; Thus far it has not happened and, I have been told that my expectations may have been too high since HMV remains profitable despite its troublesome retail sites.
</atom:summary><link>http://uklegaleagle.blogspot.com/2011/02/jjb-proposed-cva-will-it-succeed.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Anonymous)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1284392475241895935.post-1092188161431574000</guid><pubDate>Tue, 08 Feb 2011 22:14:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2011-02-08T22:14:21.566+00:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">clients</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">law firms</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">legal fees</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">legal process outsourcing</category><title>Legal Process Outsourcing: A crime against . . . ?</title><atom:summary type="text">The news that Herbert Smith and Allen &amp;amp; Overy have opened offices in Belfast followed by further news that Addleshaw Goddard is opening a depot in Manchester to do due diligence and less complex legal tasks has resulted in a tumult of comments across the twitter- and blog- sphere.&amp;nbsp; Everyone is entitled to their opinion on this subject but I take issue with those whose opinion is that the</atom:summary><link>http://uklegaleagle.blogspot.com/2011/02/legal-process-outsourcing-crime-against.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Anonymous)</author><thr:total>3</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1284392475241895935.post-2235196191784526658</guid><pubDate>Thu, 03 Feb 2011 19:04:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2011-02-03T19:04:33.573+00:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">client care</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">clients</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">law firms</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">lawyers</category><title>The client-lawyer relationship - can we fix it?</title><atom:summary type="text">This blog really continues a debate that was started by @legalbizzle and @legalbrat a few weeks ago.&amp;nbsp; There are a number of postings relevant which you&amp;nbsp;might consider pre-course material including:
What lawyers can learn from call centres by Legal Bizzle
It's not about the biscuits by Legal Bizzle
It's client care but not as we know it by Legal Brat
In truth this is not a new debate, in</atom:summary><link>http://uklegaleagle.blogspot.com/2011/02/client-lawyer-relationship-can-we-fix.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Anonymous)</author><thr:total>4</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1284392475241895935.post-8201735226665528058</guid><pubDate>Fri, 28 Jan 2011 14:29:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2011-01-28T14:29:03.292+00:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">credit crunch</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">deficit</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Government</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">recession</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">unions</category><title>I didn't do it so I am not helping tidy up</title><atom:summary type="text">The usual line from my 5 year old when we ask him to help his 3 year old brother tidy up the toys which his 3 year old brother has tipped all over the floor is "I didn't do it so I am not helping tidy up".&amp;nbsp; If only life was so simple.

I have my suspicions that I will come in for a certain amount of criticism for some of the things I write in this latest instalment.&amp;nbsp; However, I am man </atom:summary><link>http://uklegaleagle.blogspot.com/2011/01/i-didnt-do-it-so-i-am-not-helping-tidy.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Anonymous)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1284392475241895935.post-5342894560258291108</guid><pubDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2011 22:15:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2011-01-26T12:04:28.151+00:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">client care</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">law firms</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">lawyers</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">stress</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">The Lawyer</category><title>It's Tuesday: I'm a lawyer, get me outta here!</title><atom:summary type="text">This blog&amp;nbsp;was initiated by the article appearing in The Lawyer on-line today entitled: Lawyers can't handle Tuesdays, survey reveals. &amp;nbsp;The "research" in question was commissioned by Michael Page International and its results are summed up by their marketing director Eamon Collins as follows:
"This research has told us that 10am on a Tuesday is the most stressful time of the working week</atom:summary><link>http://uklegaleagle.blogspot.com/2011/01/its-tuesday-im-lawyer-get-me-outta-here.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Anonymous)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1284392475241895935.post-1214689285920940748</guid><pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2011 20:15:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2011-01-24T20:18:41.179+00:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">client care</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">clients</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">law firms</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">lawyers</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">legal fees</category><title>The client care debate - an out houser's view.</title><atom:summary type="text">Let's get one thing straight.&amp;nbsp; This is meant to be controversial, it is meant to stimulate debate.

There have been a number of excellent posts in the last couple of weeks by stalwarts of the in-house blogging circuit on the provision of legal services by law firms and lawyers.&amp;nbsp; Specific examples include:
"It's client care but not as we know it" by @legalbrat
"Crossing a (red)line" and </atom:summary><link>http://uklegaleagle.blogspot.com/2011/01/client-care-debate-out-housers-view.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Anonymous)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item></channel></rss>