LSAT Tweet

June 2007 LSAT, Section 2, Question 20

2009-11-27T13:45:00.000-05:00

Q20= Gamba argues # of votes (sample size) opposing water system is too small to be representative of majority of public opinion. E #LSAT

June 2007 LSAT, Section 2, Question 19

2009-11-25T13:45:00.004-05:00

LSAT PrepTest PDFs

LSAT Study Schedules

LSAT Cheat Sheets

Logic Games

Logical Reasoning

Reading Comprehension

Admissions

PrepTests

Schedules

Cheat Sheets

Logic Games

Logical Reasoning

Reading Comprehension

Admissions

Q19=urban groups irrelevant to the argument. choices BCDE all help strengthen the argument, but choice A about urban groups has no effect. A

June 2007 LSAT, Section 2, Question 18

2009-11-24T13:45:00.000-05:00

Q18=If researchers have big incentive 2disprove hypotheses & if many work for new clim findings, expect them to try disprove global warm. B

June 2007 LSAT, Section 2, Question 17

2009-11-23T13:45:00.000-05:00

Q17=computer experts not qualified to talk about institutions' biggest threats. as far as we know, their expertise is limited to comps. B

June 2007 LSAT, Section 2, Question 16

2009-11-20T13:45:00.000-05:00

Q16=ppl must explicitly disagree on point at issue. T&S express opposing opinions on science yielding precise math results being suspect. D

June 2007 LSAT, Section 2, Question 15

2009-11-19T13:45:00.000-05:00

Q15=only necessary to vaccinate every year IF new strain of flu every year. if same flu strain 2 yrs in a row, no need to vaccinate again. D

June 2007 LSAT, Section 2, Question 14

2009-11-18T13:45:00.000-05:00

Q14= 2 weaken the argument, we need evidence suggesting heat is cause of enzyme destruction. if microwaves -> hot zones, heat's the cause. E

June 2007 LSAT, Section 2, Question 13

2009-11-17T13:45:00.000-05:00

Q13=M only contains 2x as many cans as L if didn't lose some aluminum in the process. arg assumes recycling is perfectly efficient. C #LSAT

June 2007 LSAT, Section 2, Question 12

2009-11-16T13:45:00.000-05:00

Q12=take stimulus in abstract terms: stimulus says if you can't do 2 things at once, you have no obligation to do always do either 1.A #LSAT

June 2007 LSAT, Section 2, Question 11

2009-11-13T13:45:00.000-05:00

Q11=arg makes analogy between 1 unfounded complaint & another. thus, arg suggests electronic media not necessarily harmful 2 human mind. C

June 2007 LSAT, Section 2, Question 10

2009-11-12T13:45:00.000-05:00

Q10= rephrase: b/c double-blind techniques prevent neg conseq (evidence) -> sci should use them (conclusion). arg leads to recommendation. B

June 2007 LSAT, Section 2, Question 9

2009-11-11T13:45:00.000-05:00

Q9=Arg=Sales will decline b/c 13-16yo group decreasing in size. However, arg ignores possibility another age group will buy games instead. E

June 2007 LSAT, Section 2, Question 8

2009-11-10T13:45:00.001-05:00

Q8=Evidence:Electric cars ONLY powered by river dams, nuclear plants, or coal plants. Conclusion: electric cars will cause enviro damage. A

June 2007 LSAT, Section 2, Question 7

2009-11-09T13:45:00.000-05:00

Q7=If advanced -> abstract principles. If adv->NOT self-interest & NOT societal norms & conventions. Jadine acts from abstract principles. D

June 2007 LSAT, Section 2, Question 6

2009-11-06T13:45:00.000-05:00

Q6= app->ugrad. Felon->~app.Contra=app->~felon. Thus,app -> ugrad& ~felony. Cnclsn=Felon&ugrad->~ ExecAd.Thus,qualify ExAd->qualify ExBrd. B

June 2007 LSAT, Section 2, Question 5

2009-11-05T13:45:00.000-05:00

Q5=Arg=minor gases->global warming. If most warming occurred before most minor gases' buildup, scientist's evidence won't explain warming. B

June 2007 LSAT, Section 2, Question 4

2009-11-04T13:45:00.001-05:00

Q4=Arg assumes just b/c Danto Foods has incentive to say rival's food is unhealthy that its report must be inaccurate. Ad hominem flaw. A

June 2007 LSAT, Section 2, Question 3

2009-11-03T13:45:00.000-05:00

Q3=Arg=ppl at century's end act like ppl at life's end. ppl at life's end look back at life, so ppl at century's end look back at century. D

June 2007 LSAT, Section 2, Question 2

2009-11-02T13:45:00.000-05:00

Q2=Evidence:Labs bark a lot & StBern bark little. Arg's flaw: mix has avg of 2 qualities. Mix Toxic&Non doesn't have 2 B moderately toxic. B

June 2007 LSAT, Section 2, Question 1

2009-10-30T13:45:00.000-04:00

Jun07/Sec2/Q1=Not all efforts 2 boost productivity R beneficial. Some harm employees & biz. Arg's conclusion=not all biz' actions help biz-B

October 1996 LSAT, Section 4, Question 26

2009-10-29T13:45:00.000-04:00

Q26=If home fires caused by smoking in bed often start after ppl asleep, decreased smoking should cause DECREASE in home fire deaths.B #LSAT

October 1996 LSAT, Section 4, Question 25

2009-10-28T13:45:00.000-04:00

Q25=If person who involuntarily hums can learn to make it voluntary, then Marianne has to learn to control her humming or be DQ'ed. D. #LSAT

October 1996 LSAT, Section 4, Question 24

2009-10-27T13:45:00.000-04:00

Q24=If only voluntary actions can justify disqualifying a player then Marianne can't be disqualified for humming, so she'll be okay. B #LSAT

October 1996 LSAT, Section 4, Question 23

2009-10-26T13:45:00.000-04:00

Q23=We don't care whether hyena populations double or not. We're concerned with how baboons on reserve are affected by garbage dump. D #LSAT

October 1996 LSAT, Section 4, Question 23

2009-10-23T13:45:00.000-04:00

Q22=Chang argues genetic predisposition may not come from a single gene, but from many. There are more possibilities than Wirth assumes. A.