<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.2" --><rss xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">
    <channel>
        <title>TOTT Articles</title>
        <description><![CDATA[Think on These Things Articles by Gary Gilley, Pastory-Teacher at Southern View Chapel in Springfield, Illinois. ]]></description>
        <link>http://www.svchapel.org/</link>
        <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 11:01:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>FeedCreator 1.7.2</generator>
        <atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/ThinkOnTheseThingsArticles" /><feedburner:info uri="thinkonthesethingsarticles" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><feedburner:emailServiceId>ThinkOnTheseThingsArticles</feedburner:emailServiceId><feedburner:feedburnerHostname>http://feedburner.google.com</feedburner:feedburnerHostname><item>
            <title>Contemplative Prayer</title>
            <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ThinkOnTheseThingsArticles/~3/gXbTV2iF0QM/761-contemplative-prayer</link>
            <description>&lt;em&gt;(April/May 2012 - Volume 18, Issue 2)&lt;/em&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Of all the spiritual disciplines the   Spiritual Formation Movement promotes, none is more important than prayer and   the intake of God’s Word.  On the surface   we would expect little resistance to these two disciplines since they have been   recognized as essential to spiritual growth by virtually all Christians from   all traditions. Sadly, upon closer examination we discover that what is meant   by most evangelical Christians when they reference prayer and Bible intake is   not always what the leaders within spiritual formation mean. We begin with   Donald Whitney, Associate Professor of Biblical Spirituality at Southern Seminary, who agrees with Carl Lundquist,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The New Testament     church built two other disciplines upon prayer and Bible study, the Lord’s     Supper and small cell groups.  John     Wesley emphasized five works of piety by adding fasting.  The medieval mystics wrote about nine     disciplines clustered around three experiences: purgation of sin, enlightenment     of the spirit and union with God.  Later     the Keswick Convention approach to practical holiness revolved around five     different religious exercises.  Today     Richard Foster’s book, Celebration of&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ThinkOnTheseThingsArticles/~4/gXbTV2iF0QM" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
            <author>Gary Gilley</author>
            <pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2012 01:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.svchapel.org/resources/articles/22-contemporary-issues/761-contemplative-prayer</guid>
        <feedburner:origLink>http://www.svchapel.org/resources/articles/22-contemporary-issues/761-contemplative-prayer</feedburner:origLink></item>
        <item>
            <title>Spiritual Formation</title>
            <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ThinkOnTheseThingsArticles/~3/qtBziqCeqhc/753-spiritual-formation</link>
            <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;(February/March 2012 - Volume 18, Issue 1)&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Almost everyone on the cutting edge of Christianity is talking about spiritual formation.  From books to magazine articles to sermons to seminary courses, spiritual formation is a hot topic.  What is spiritual formation?  What does it teach?  Is it something to embrace, ignore or fight?  With this edition of &lt;I&gt;Think on These Things&lt;/I&gt; I want to begin an examination of these questions and more.  Lord willing, all of the &lt;I&gt;TOTT&lt;/I&gt;s articles in 2012 will be devoted to detailing and evaluating some aspect of what some have called the “Spiritual Formation Movement.”  In this lead article I intend to offer a definition of spiritual formation, trace its origins, mention a few of its practices, illustrate its recent popularity, and briefly identify its strengths and dangers.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;B&gt;In Search of a Definition&lt;/B&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;When the average person speaks of spiritual formation they assume that it is a modern or trendy synonym for discipleship.  Throughout church history, in obedience to the Lord’s command found in the Great Commission (Matt 28:19-20), the church has dedicated itself to the task&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ThinkOnTheseThingsArticles/~4/qtBziqCeqhc" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
            <author>Gary Gilley</author>
            <pubDate>Sun, 19 Feb 2012 23:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.svchapel.org/resources/articles/20-christian-living/753-spiritual-formation</guid>
        <feedburner:origLink>http://www.svchapel.org/resources/articles/20-christian-living/753-spiritual-formation</feedburner:origLink></item>
        <item>
            <title>The Social Gospel, Yesterday and Today - Part 2</title>
            <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ThinkOnTheseThingsArticles/~3/ZFrwxh6ARKM/746-the-social-gospel-yesterday-and-today-part-2</link>
            <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;(December 2011/January 2012 - Volume 17, Issue 6)&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the first part of this study, we examined
  together the history of the social gospel as it presented itself in the late 19&lt;sup&gt;th&lt;/sup&gt; and early 20&lt;sup&gt;th&lt;/sup&gt; centuries, and then documented a resurgence of the
  social gospel agenda as found at the present time.  The original social gospel movement began as
  an appendage to the emerging liberalism that started in Germany and ultimately
  swept through the Western church.  As the
  growing liberal movement matured, it left behind most doctrinal distinctives
  held by earlier Protestants and eventually came to be defined by social
  action.  Today a new wave of social
  involvement, as a major tenant of church ministry, is flowing through
  evangelical churches, changing the very nature of church dynamics and
  outreach.  The issue at hand is not
  whether Christians should be involved with their culture, but to what extent
  attempting to solve the injustices and problems of the culture is the mission
  of the church.  This has become one of
  the more hotly debated concerns (some believe the hottest) within evangelism
  today. &lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ThinkOnTheseThingsArticles/~4/ZFrwxh6ARKM" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
            <author>Gary Gilley</author>
            <pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2011 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.svchapel.org/resources/articles/21-church-trends/746-the-social-gospel-yesterday-and-today-part-2</guid>
        <feedburner:origLink>http://www.svchapel.org/resources/articles/21-church-trends/746-the-social-gospel-yesterday-and-today-part-2</feedburner:origLink></item>
        <item>
            <title>The Social Gospel, Yesterday and Today - Part 1</title>
            <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ThinkOnTheseThingsArticles/~3/XPlW8pH2MEk/733-the-social-gospel-yesterday-and-today-part-1</link>
            <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;(October/November 2011 - Volume 17, Issue 5)&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;One of the important issues which the church   has always had to address is that of its role in society.  In the Old Testament, the Lord chose Abraham   to be the father of a called-out race of people.  Years later, the Lord would establish the   nation of Israel under the Mosaic Covenant. Detailed laws and regulations were   given to Israel at the time including how that nation was to be governed, how poverty   was to be dealt with, how widows and orphans were to be helped and how   injustices were to be corrected.  All of   these matters were addressed almost exclusively within the context of the   nation of Israel, with relatively minor concern for the surrounding nations. The   Old Covenant would continue to be in force throughout Old Testament history   until finally superseded at the dawning of the church age in Acts 2 with the   coming of the Holy Spirit at the day of Pentecost.  While the Jewish people and the nation of Israel   still retain a primary place in the plan of&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ThinkOnTheseThingsArticles/~4/XPlW8pH2MEk" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
            <author>Gary Gilley</author>
            <pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2011 05:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.svchapel.org/resources/articles/21-church-trends/733-the-social-gospel-yesterday-and-today-part-1</guid>
        <feedburner:origLink>http://www.svchapel.org/resources/articles/21-church-trends/733-the-social-gospel-yesterday-and-today-part-1</feedburner:origLink></item>
        <item>
            <title>The Tragedy of Self-deception</title>
            <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ThinkOnTheseThingsArticles/~3/JceFREZOE_o/732-the-tragedy-of-self-deception</link>
            <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;(August/September 2011 - Volume 17, Issue 4)&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;“The   power of the human mind to deceive itself seems infinite”&lt;a name="_ednref1" href="http://www.svchapel.org/#_edn1"&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt; The Greek philosopher Demosthenes said,   “Nothing is easier than self-deceit.  For   what each man wishes, that he also believes to be truth.”&lt;a name="_ednref2" href="http://www.svchapel.org/#_edn2"&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt; In his confessions Augustine wrote, “Man’s   love of truth is such that when he loves something which is not the truth, he   pretends to himself that what he loves is the truth, and because he hates to be   proved wrong, he will not allow himself to be convinced that he is deceiving   himself.  So he hates the real truth for the sake of what he takes to his heart in its place.”&lt;a name="_ednref3" href="http://www.svchapel.org/#_edn3"&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The   fact that we are easily self-deceived should surprise no Christian for, as the   inspired prophet Jeremiah wrote centuries ago, “The heart is more deceitful   than all else and is desperately sick, who can understand it” (Jere 17:9)?   Jeremiah quickly adds, I, the Lord, search the heart and I test the mind, even   to give to each man according to his ways,&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ThinkOnTheseThingsArticles/~4/JceFREZOE_o" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
            <author>Gary Gilley</author>
            <pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2011 05:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.svchapel.org/resources/articles/25-psychology/732-the-tragedy-of-self-deception</guid>
        <feedburner:origLink>http://www.svchapel.org/resources/articles/25-psychology/732-the-tragedy-of-self-deception</feedburner:origLink></item>
        <item>
            <title>Love Wins - Universalism’s New Champion</title>
            <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ThinkOnTheseThingsArticles/~3/Y6xkCdnumUI/715-love-wins-universalisms-new-champion</link>
            <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;(June/July 2011 - Volume 17, Issue 3)&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There   was so much hype surrounding the publication of Rob Bells new book &lt;em&gt;Love Wins&lt;/em&gt; that even before it was released emotional critiques were flooding the Internet   and the bloggers were in full swing.  When John Piper, who had not yet read the   book, tweeted three little words, “Farewell Rob Bell,” the blogosphere exploded   and the war was on.  Bell, who claims credentials within the evangelical camp,   was purported to be teaching universalism.  When the book was finally on the   market it immediately rose to the top of everybody’s bestsellers list.  Bell was featured on the cover of &lt;em&gt;Time&lt;/em&gt; magazine, interviewed on both secular and Christian television and radio programs and perhaps became the “rock star” that &lt;em&gt;Time&lt;/em&gt; claimed he was some years ago.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When   I reluctantly determined I needed to read what everybody was talking about I   was speaking at a conference in Texas.  I, with a couple of other speakers,   went to the largest Christian bookstore in the city, an international chain,   and after not finding the book I asked the&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ThinkOnTheseThingsArticles/~4/Y6xkCdnumUI" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
            <author>Gary Gilley</author>
            <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2011 01:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.svchapel.org/resources/articles/20-christian-living/715-love-wins-universalisms-new-champion</guid>
        <feedburner:origLink>http://www.svchapel.org/resources/articles/20-christian-living/715-love-wins-universalisms-new-champion</feedburner:origLink></item>
        <item>
            <title>The Crossless Gospel - Part 2</title>
            <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ThinkOnTheseThingsArticles/~3/F7O_lFVri7Y/710-the-crossless-gospel-part-2</link>
            <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;(April/May 2011 - Volume 17, Issue 2)&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;In the first paper on the “Crossless Gospel”
  I identified four distinct positions taken by evangelicals in regard to the
  gospel.  These four schools of thought
  have much in common but disagree on important points.  The “Gospel is the Kingdom” view is the idea
  that the gospel is essentially the proclamation that Jesus is Lord over all
  things and it is the mandate of the church to work toward social/political/economic
  justice throughout the world.  Some, such
  as N. T. Wright, would add a spiritual dimension to the agenda and call men to
  reconciliation with Christ while others, e.g. Brian McLaren, would see this
  invitation as unnecessary.  Those who
  proclaim the gospel of “Lordship Salvation” are concerned with a right
  relationship with Christ.  They believe such
  a relationship is possible only on the basis of the finished work of Jesus
  Christ who now offers salvation to all who repent and turn to Him alone by
  faith alone.  Reception of the gospel
  involves surrendering our previous gods and that which we have formerly trusted
and&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ThinkOnTheseThingsArticles/~4/F7O_lFVri7Y" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
            <author>Gary Gilley</author>
            <pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2011 14:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.svchapel.org/resources/articles/23-doctrine/710-the-crossless-gospel-part-2</guid>
        <feedburner:origLink>http://www.svchapel.org/resources/articles/23-doctrine/710-the-crossless-gospel-part-2</feedburner:origLink></item>
        <item>
            <title>The Crossless Gospel - Part 1</title>
            <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ThinkOnTheseThingsArticles/~3/sY4ilVLfTXE/699-the-crossless-gospel</link>
            <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;(February/March 2011 - Volume 17, Issue 1)&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It is a bit unsettling to realize two
  millennia after the coming of our Savior to earth that His followers are still
  debating the content of the gospel, the good news, which He came to bring.  This is not to say that there is not a degree
  of unanimity among those claiming to be evangelicals.  It is hard to disagree with Paul’s clear
  statement in 1 Corinthians 15:1-4 which informs us that the gospel that saves
  us concerns the death of Christ for our sins (i.e., as our substitute), His
  burial and resurrection.  In these few
  words we learn that the good news centers around the cross on which the
  incarnate Son of God died in order that He might save us from our sins and give
  us eternal life.  This shorthand version
  of the gospel is expanded through other Scriptures.  When we put all the pieces together we find a
  four-layered message that can be outlined in four words: God, man, Christ,
  response:&lt;a href="http://www.svchapel.org/#_edn1" name="_ednref1" title=""&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
  &lt;li&gt;God: God is holy and&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ThinkOnTheseThingsArticles/~4/sY4ilVLfTXE" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
            <author>Gary Gilley</author>
            <pubDate>Sat, 05 Mar 2011 15:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.svchapel.org/resources/articles/23-doctrine/699-the-crossless-gospel</guid>
        <feedburner:origLink>http://www.svchapel.org/resources/articles/23-doctrine/699-the-crossless-gospel</feedburner:origLink></item>
        <item>
            <title>Atonement Wars - Part 2</title>
            <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ThinkOnTheseThingsArticles/~3/NUmSIgkRcmk/692-atonement-wars-part-2</link>
            <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;(December 2010/January 2011 - Volume 16, Issue 6)&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In Part one of “The Atonement Wars” a number
  of atonement theories having found favor at various points in church history were
  explained.  These included the moral
  influence theory, &lt;i&gt;Christus Victor&lt;/i&gt; and
  the Ransom to Satan theory.  While I
  reject the last of these theories, the other two have biblical backing and thus
  fill out our understanding of why Christ went to the cross.  However, I believe the central teaching of
  Scripture in regard to Christ’s cross-work is best defined as the Penal
  Substitutionary Atonement (PSA).  It is
  PSA that is facing resistance from many who would be happy to embrace the cross
  as a moral example of love or a victory over the forces of evil.  Yet the Bible teaches that while Christ’s
  death was a great example and resulted in the defeat of evil forces, more
  importantly His death was necessary in order that our sins might be forgiven
and we be reconciled to God.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Definitions and
  Challenges:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Wayne
  Grudem provides this helpful definition, &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
  &lt;p&gt;Christ’s death was
    ‘penal’&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ThinkOnTheseThingsArticles/~4/NUmSIgkRcmk" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
            <author>Gary Gilley</author>
            <pubDate>Sat, 08 Jan 2011 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.svchapel.org/resources/articles/23-doctrine/692-atonement-wars-part-2</guid>
        <feedburner:origLink>http://www.svchapel.org/resources/articles/23-doctrine/692-atonement-wars-part-2</feedburner:origLink></item>
        <item>
            <title>Atonement Wars - Part 1</title>
            <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ThinkOnTheseThingsArticles/~3/KfRQyPM2yjI/687-atonement-wars</link>
            <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;(October/November 2010 - Volume 16, Issue 5)&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When Steve Chalk and Brian McLaren accused
  evangelicals who believed in the substitutionary death of Christ of embracing a
  form of Divine child abuse,&lt;a href="http://www.svchapel.org/#_edn1"
name="_ednref1" title=""&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt; Christians everywhere did a double-take.  Having sung with gusto for years that great line penned by Charles
  Wesley, “Amazing love, how can it be that Thou my God shouldst die for me” Christians
  could not believe that they were being accused of promoting child abuse by men
  who claimed to be at least on the fringes of the evangelical community.   What
  McLaren and Chalk had done was bring to the surface for all to see the
  long-standing debate by theologians about the meaning of the cross.   Almost no one in Christian circles doubts
  the historicity of the crucifixion, but &lt;i&gt;why&lt;/i&gt; &lt;i&gt;Christ died &lt;/i&gt;has long been contested.  Of late, due to the rising popularity of
  everything from the    Emergent    Church to the
  Ancient-Future Faith movement to the New Perspective on Paul, the significance
  of Christ’s cross-work, often called the atonement, has regained traction.  In particular what has&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ThinkOnTheseThingsArticles/~4/KfRQyPM2yjI" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
            <author>Gary Gilley</author>
            <pubDate>Wed, 03 Nov 2010 23:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.svchapel.org/resources/articles/23-doctrine/687-atonement-wars</guid>
        <feedburner:origLink>http://www.svchapel.org/resources/articles/23-doctrine/687-atonement-wars</feedburner:origLink></item>
        <item>
            <title>Inside the Insider Movement and More</title>
            <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ThinkOnTheseThingsArticles/~3/Au-NqQT8vXw/679-inside-the-insider-movement-and-more</link>
            <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;(August/September 2010 - Volume 16, Issue 4)&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the 1970s, as I was being trained at Moody Bible Institute for future ministry, there was a consensus among evangelicals that Roman Catholicism taught a false gospel and therefore those within the Church of Rome (at least those believing Catholic doctrine) were in need of evangelism.  Some mission organizations focused much, if not all, of their efforts on Roman Catholic countries throughout the world.  The idea that Catholics were not truly Christians began to erode as various evangelical leaders stepped up to challenge this view and as others actually defected from their Protestant roots to Roman or Eastern Orthodoxy. This was followed by a major shift, at least in the minds of many, in 1994 when Charles Colson and Father John Neuhaus united leaders from both traditions around their now famous “Evangelicals and Catholics Together” document which, in essence, stated that while differences remained between the two branches of Christendom it was time that we recognized one another as brothers and sisters in Christ.  With well respected evangelical leaders such as J.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ThinkOnTheseThingsArticles/~4/Au-NqQT8vXw" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
            <author>Gary Gilley</author>
            <pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 00:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.svchapel.org/resources/articles/21-church-trends/679-inside-the-insider-movement-and-more</guid>
        <feedburner:origLink>http://www.svchapel.org/resources/articles/21-church-trends/679-inside-the-insider-movement-and-more</feedburner:origLink></item>
        <item>
            <title>Important Books</title>
            <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ThinkOnTheseThingsArticles/~3/QYsB0kpC67Q/669-important-books</link>
            <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;(June/July 2010 - Volume 16, Issue 3)&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The
  evangelical press is pouring out hundreds of new books every year, most are forgettable
  but a few leave a valuable imprint upon the Christian community.  Given the limited amount of time that even a
  serious student has to read it is important that attention is given to books
  that make a difference.  I would like to
  devote this edition of &lt;i&gt;Think on These
    Things&lt;/i&gt; to a few recent volumes that have caught the attention of many
  today.  These are books that I am being
  asked about via e-mail or as I travel to conferences.  Some are most helpful, others are of a
serious concern, and others are mixed bag.   &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Crazy
  Love&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  by Francis
  Chan&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The basic thesis of &lt;i&gt;Crazy Love&lt;/i&gt; is sound.  Since
  God loves us with a crazy, inexplicable love, our love for Him should be just
  as crazy and our resultant lifestyle should be radical in its sacrifice for
  Christ.  Chan has no patience for
  “lukewarm Christians” (pp.  22, 65-88,
  97-98), who are chasing the American dream rather&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ThinkOnTheseThingsArticles/~4/QYsB0kpC67Q" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
            <author>Gary Gilley</author>
            <pubDate>Tue, 15 Jun 2010 01:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.svchapel.org/resources/articles/20-christian-living/669-important-books</guid>
        <feedburner:origLink>http://www.svchapel.org/resources/articles/20-christian-living/669-important-books</feedburner:origLink></item>
        <item>
            <title>Edinburgh 2010</title>
            <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ThinkOnTheseThingsArticles/~3/kEdE60co-80/659-edinburgh-2010</link>
            <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;(April/May 2010 - Volume 16, Issue 2)&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Those knowledgeable of current church history and missiology in particular are probably familiar with Edinburgh 1910.  It was considered to be the greatest missionary conference to that date and subsequently has proven to be the most influential.  In honor of its centennial, four major conferences are planned for 2010, having been in development since 2005&lt;a name="_ednref1" href="http://www.svchapel.org/#_edn1"&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt; (along with many smaller venues), all connected with and under the umbrella of Edinburgh 2010.  The first will be in Tokyo, May 11-15.  Edinburgh is next up on June 2-6, followed by Cape Town, October 16-25 and finally Boston, November 4-7.  Each conference is somewhat independent, with different rosters of speakers, papers and agendas; however they are working in cooperation and will be sharing their research and attempting to set directives and initiatives for future world outreach.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Edinburgh&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;strong&gt; 1910&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It is significant for our analysis of these conferences to look back to the original Edinburgh Conference and determine why so much excitement is being generated over what happened 100 years ago.  In 1910 conference leaders John&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ThinkOnTheseThingsArticles/~4/kEdE60co-80" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
            <author>Gary Gilley</author>
            <pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2010 23:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.svchapel.org/resources/articles/21-church-trends/659-edinburgh-2010</guid>
        <feedburner:origLink>http://www.svchapel.org/resources/articles/21-church-trends/659-edinburgh-2010</feedburner:origLink></item>
        <item>
            <title>The Manhattan Declaration</title>
            <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ThinkOnTheseThingsArticles/~3/nWwYPviTQ-Y/653-the-manhattan-declaration</link>
            <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;(February/March 2010 - Volume 16, Issue 1)&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Christian village is all abuzz these days
  about &lt;i&gt;The&lt;/i&gt; &lt;i&gt;Manhattan Declaration&lt;/i&gt;, yet another brainchild of Charles Colson
  (along with Timothy George and Robert George) in his ever vigilant attempts at
  societal improvement and ecumenical unity.   In his earlier efforts, in particular the &lt;i&gt;Evangelicals and Catholics Together&lt;/i&gt; documents, Colson and Roman
  Catholic priest John Neuhaus attempted, with some apparent success, to convince
  Christendom that their two separate traditions held far more in common than it
  realized and it was time for both sides to lay down their arms and unite
  against liberal Christianity and secular ideology for the good of society.  While admitting that strong differences still
  remained, Colson, Neuhaus and their supporters tried to maintain that the two
  communities were preaching essentially the same gospel message and therefore it
  was time to join forces against their greater enemies. &lt;i&gt;The Manhattan Declaration&lt;/i&gt; addresses a similar theme but focuses
  more on remedying morally corrupting influences in
  America    than on the nature of the
  gospel.  While there are a great number
  of social evils that&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ThinkOnTheseThingsArticles/~4/nWwYPviTQ-Y" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
            <author>Gary Gilley</author>
            <pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 20:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.svchapel.org/resources/articles/22-contemporary-issues/653-the-manhattan-declaration</guid>
        <feedburner:origLink>http://www.svchapel.org/resources/articles/22-contemporary-issues/653-the-manhattan-declaration</feedburner:origLink></item>
        <item>
            <title>My Favorite Books - Part 3</title>
            <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ThinkOnTheseThingsArticles/~3/LEFjz-UerW4/644-my-favorite-books-part-3</link>
            <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;(December 2009/January 2010 - Volume 15, Issue 7)&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A little over five years ago I wrote two papers identifying my favorite books in various categories.  At this time I want to supplement that list for a couple of reasons.  First, as readers of my articles and book reviews know, &lt;em&gt;Think on These Things&lt;/em&gt; is largely a discernment ministry and, as such, many of our reviews are of a warning nature.  Some have even asked if I am in agreement with any book.  My standard answer is that I certainly am, as long as, and to the extent that, the book is faithful to Scripture.  Realizing that all human efforts fall short at some point, it is important that we endeavor to be Bereans and examine books, not for the purpose of criticism, but for their compliance to the revealed Word of God.  With that in mind, listed below are numerous books that, while I do not endorse everything contained in them, I believe meet the test of Scripture.  Secondly, having read approximately 300 books since “My Favorite Books, Part 2”&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ThinkOnTheseThingsArticles/~4/LEFjz-UerW4" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
            <author>Gary Gilley</author>
            <pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 14:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.svchapel.org/resources/articles/20-christian-living/644-my-favorite-books-part-3</guid>
        <feedburner:origLink>http://www.svchapel.org/resources/articles/20-christian-living/644-my-favorite-books-part-3</feedburner:origLink></item>
    </channel>
</rss>

