<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?><rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" version="2.0">

<channel>
	<title>Technollama</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.technollama.co.uk/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
	<link>https://www.technollama.co.uk</link>
	<description>Not just another technology blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2026 06:20:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-GB</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">7692069</site>	<item>
		<title>Pastiche or cliché? What Pelham II might mean for AI outputs</title>
		<link>https://www.technollama.co.uk/pastiche-or-cliche-what-pelham-ii-might-mean-for-ai-outputs</link>
					<comments>https://www.technollama.co.uk/pastiche-or-cliche-what-pelham-ii-might-mean-for-ai-outputs#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andres Guadamuz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2026 06:16:51 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Artificial intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Artificial Intelligence]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.technollama.co.uk/?p=17237</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Regular readers will know that I have been interested in the pastiche exception for a while now, mostly because it has always struck me as the most underused exceptions under modern copyright law in Europe and the UK. Perhaps it is not surprising that parody gets all the attention, caricature [&#8230;]]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.technollama.co.uk/pastiche-or-cliche-what-pelham-ii-might-mean-for-ai-outputs/feed</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">17237</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why are people adopting AI to write?</title>
		<link>https://www.technollama.co.uk/why-are-people-adopting-ai-to-write</link>
					<comments>https://www.technollama.co.uk/why-are-people-adopting-ai-to-write#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andres Guadamuz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2026 10:20:40 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Artificial intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Artificial Intelligence]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.technollama.co.uk/?p=17199</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The last few weeks I have witnessed a number of interesting discussions breaking out on social media. A couple of weeks ago a US-based academic admitted using AI in some of his writing, which prompted a response from a prominent AI researcher. I&#8217;m not interested in commenting on the particulars [&#8230;]]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.technollama.co.uk/why-are-people-adopting-ai-to-write/feed</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">17199</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>An end to the input-output dichotomy in AI copyright? Like Company v Google takes an unexpected turn</title>
		<link>https://www.technollama.co.uk/an-end-to-the-input-output-dichotomy-in-ai-copyright-like-company-v-google-takes-an-unexpected-turn</link>
					<comments>https://www.technollama.co.uk/an-end-to-the-input-output-dichotomy-in-ai-copyright-like-company-v-google-takes-an-unexpected-turn#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andres Guadamuz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2026 21:18:19 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Artificial intelligence]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.technollama.co.uk/?p=17184</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve been following the CJEU case C-250/25 Like Company v Google hearing with interest (my initial thoughts on the case here). I won&#8217;t attempt to cover the entirety of the proceedings, I&#8217;ve already accumulated plenty of notes for that, but I want to focus on one specific aspect that jumped [&#8230;]]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.technollama.co.uk/an-end-to-the-input-output-dichotomy-in-ai-copyright-like-company-v-google-takes-an-unexpected-turn/feed</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">17184</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>No, the US Supreme Court did not declare that AI works cannot be copyrighted</title>
		<link>https://www.technollama.co.uk/no-the-us-supreme-court-did-not-declare-that-ai-works-cannot-be-copyrighted</link>
					<comments>https://www.technollama.co.uk/no-the-us-supreme-court-did-not-declare-that-ai-works-cannot-be-copyrighted#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andres Guadamuz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2026 16:14:47 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Artificial intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Artificial Intelligence]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.technollama.co.uk/?p=17161</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[If you have been online recently you may have seen a variation of a story that reads something like this: &#8220;The US Supreme Court declares that AI generated works aren&#8217;t copyrightable.&#8221; I won&#8217;t name and shame all of the places that have written variations of this headline, some which should [&#8230;]]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.technollama.co.uk/no-the-us-supreme-court-did-not-declare-that-ai-works-cannot-be-copyrighted/feed</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">17161</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>SeeDance and the new media landscape</title>
		<link>https://www.technollama.co.uk/seedance-and-the-new-media-landscape</link>
					<comments>https://www.technollama.co.uk/seedance-and-the-new-media-landscape#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andres Guadamuz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2026 06:03:55 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Artificial intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Artificial Intelligence]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.technollama.co.uk/?p=17128</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A few months ago we were pondering a few things about the future of media here at Llama Towers. I speculated about a world where you could generate your own Star Wars trilogy based on the Timothy Zahn&#8217;s novels, fix the ending of Game of Thrones, or finish cancelled series [&#8230;]]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.technollama.co.uk/seedance-and-the-new-media-landscape/feed</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">17128</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Can you steal game gold pieces? The Court of Appeal says yes</title>
		<link>https://www.technollama.co.uk/can-you-steal-game-gold-pieces-the-court-of-appeal-says-yes</link>
					<comments>https://www.technollama.co.uk/can-you-steal-game-gold-pieces-the-court-of-appeal-says-yes#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andres Guadamuz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2026 19:15:12 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Games]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtual worlds]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.technollama.co.uk/?p=15127</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s been a while since we had a proper digital property and virtual gold story here at Llama Towers, I have to admit that it&#8217;s been mostly AI for the last few years. But a recent decision in the Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) in England and Wales has prompted [&#8230;]]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.technollama.co.uk/can-you-steal-game-gold-pieces-the-court-of-appeal-says-yes/feed</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">15127</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why We Need Tech Lawyers to Shine Again</title>
		<link>https://www.technollama.co.uk/why-we-need-tech-lawyers-to-shine-again</link>
					<comments>https://www.technollama.co.uk/why-we-need-tech-lawyers-to-shine-again#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andres Guadamuz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2026 10:21:18 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Academia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech law]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.technollama.co.uk/?p=15119</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Text from my editorial in IIC. In courtrooms across the globe, a quiet crisis is brewing. As the number of artificial intelligence copyright litigations increases, judges are being asked to decide the fate of technologies that often operate in dimensions the human mind struggles to visualise accurately. From the High [&#8230;]]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.technollama.co.uk/why-we-need-tech-lawyers-to-shine-again/feed</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">15119</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>We need to talk about the EU TDM exception and AI training</title>
		<link>https://www.technollama.co.uk/we-need-to-talk-about-the-eu-tdm-exception-and-ai-training</link>
					<comments>https://www.technollama.co.uk/we-need-to-talk-about-the-eu-tdm-exception-and-ai-training#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andres Guadamuz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2025 18:28:54 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Artificial intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Artificial Intelligence]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.technollama.co.uk/?p=15071</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Following the recent decision in GEMA v OpenAI, and last year&#8217;s Kneschke v LAION, we now have two German courts grappling with the applicability of the text and data mining exceptions to AI training. Despite arriving at different outcomes, LAION won, OpenAI lost, both decisions share something important: they confirm [&#8230;]]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.technollama.co.uk/we-need-to-talk-about-the-eu-tdm-exception-and-ai-training/feed</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">15071</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>