<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">

<channel>
	<title>Technically Legal</title>
	
	<link>http://www.technicallylegal.org</link>
	<description>Technology and the law. Done right.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 05:18:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/TechnicallyLegal" /><feedburner:info uri="technicallylegal" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><item>
		<title>Episode 40: Goin Gaga</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TechnicallyLegal/~3/cRAN4Q3zhSM/</link>
		<comments>http://www.technicallylegal.org/episode-40-goin-gaga/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 05:18:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Snitkoff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Podcast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CFAA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HTC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RIAA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.technicallylegal.org/?p=784</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Innocent infringement off the table, Apple sues HTC, and is it illegal to poach tickets?
 Please download the podcast, or subscribe to the feed. Feel free to e-mail us with questions, suggestions or comments.
Innocent infringement off the table
5th Circuit rules innocent infringement defense not supported in Maverick v Harper
The opinion
Apple Sues HTC
Apple sues HTC over [...]


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://www.technicallylegal.org/apple-sues-htc-over-iphone-patents/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Apple Sues HTC Over iPhone Patents'>Apple Sues HTC Over iPhone Patents</a> <small>This is still breaking, so we&#8217;ll have more coverage as...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.technicallylegal.org/technically-legal-podcast-episode-13/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Technically Legal Podcast: Episode 13'>Technically Legal Podcast: Episode 13</a> <small>Apple and the FCC, Cyber Harassment, and the Redbox Suit....</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.technicallylegal.org/technically-legal-podcast-episode-2/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Technically Legal Podcast: Episode 2'>Technically Legal Podcast: Episode 2</a> <small>Tony LaRussa sues Twitter, Yahoo sues the NFL, and patents...</small></li>
</ol>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Innocent infringement off the table, Apple sues HTC, and is it illegal to poach tickets?</p>
<p> Please <a href = "http://www.technicallylegal.org/podcast/Technically_Legal_Episode_40.mp3">download the podcast</a>, or <a href = "http://feeds2.feedburner.com/TechnicallyLegalPodcast">subscribe to the feed</a>. Feel free to <a href = "mailto:podcast@technicallylegal.org">e-mail us</a> with questions, suggestions or comments.</p>
<h3>Innocent infringement off the table</h3>
<p><a href = "http://recordingindustryvspeople.blogspot.com/#7687033938061541204">5th Circuit rules innocent infringement defense not supported in Maverick v Harper</a><br />
<a href = "http://beckermanlegal.com/pdf/?file=/Lawyer_Copyright_Internet_Law/maverick_harper_100225FifthCirDecis.pdf">The opinion</a></p>
<h3>Apple Sues HTC</h3>
<p><a href = "http://news.cnet.com/8301-1035_3-10462116-94.html">Apple sues HTC over iPhone patents</a><br />
<a href = "http://news.cnet.com/8301-1035_3-10462213-94.html?tag=mncol;txt">Apple sues HTC&#8211;court filings</a><br />
<a href = "http://www.scribd.com/doc/27724245/Apple-HTC-Complaint-U-S-Google-HTC">Apple HTC Complaint U.S. Google &#038; HTC</a></p>
<h3>Poaching Gaga Tickets</h3>
<p><a href = "http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2010/03/02/couldnt-get-those-coveted-gaga-tickets-heres-why/?utm_source=feedburner&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+wsj%2Flaw%2Ffeed+%28WSJ.com%3A+Law+Blog%29&#038;utm_content=Google+Feedfetcher">Couldn’t Get Those Coveted Gaga Tickets? Here’s Why</a><br />
<a href = "http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703943504575095622582020594.html?KEYWORDS=ticketmaster">Four Charged in Bid To Buy, Resell Tickets</a></p>


<p>Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://www.technicallylegal.org/apple-sues-htc-over-iphone-patents/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Apple Sues HTC Over iPhone Patents'>Apple Sues HTC Over iPhone Patents</a> <small>This is still breaking, so we&#8217;ll have more coverage as...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.technicallylegal.org/technically-legal-podcast-episode-13/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Technically Legal Podcast: Episode 13'>Technically Legal Podcast: Episode 13</a> <small>Apple and the FCC, Cyber Harassment, and the Redbox Suit....</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.technicallylegal.org/technically-legal-podcast-episode-2/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Technically Legal Podcast: Episode 2'>Technically Legal Podcast: Episode 2</a> <small>Tony LaRussa sues Twitter, Yahoo sues the NFL, and patents...</small></li>
</ol></p><div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/TechnicallyLegal?a=cRAN4Q3zhSM:sSxwhFsIeI0:yIl2AUoC8zA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/TechnicallyLegal?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/TechnicallyLegal?a=cRAN4Q3zhSM:sSxwhFsIeI0:D7DqB2pKExk"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/TechnicallyLegal?i=cRAN4Q3zhSM:sSxwhFsIeI0:D7DqB2pKExk" border="0"></img></a>
</div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TechnicallyLegal/~4/cRAN4Q3zhSM" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.technicallylegal.org/episode-40-goin-gaga/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://www.technicallylegal.org/podcast/Technically_Legal_Episode_40.mp3" length="42984963" type="audio/mpeg" />
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.technicallylegal.org/episode-40-goin-gaga/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Hulu loses Daily Show and Colbert, Viacom to Sue Bloggers?</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TechnicallyLegal/~3/IHfsNP-FJGI/</link>
		<comments>http://www.technicallylegal.org/hulu-loses-daily-show-and-colbert-viacom-to-sue-bloggers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 19:55:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David O'Brien</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Commentary]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.technicallylegal.org/?p=771</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hulu announced on March 2, 2010, that Comedy Central (owned by Viacom) is pulling The Daily Show and The Colbert Report from the website.  
Why?! The answer, it turns out, starts with an &#8220;S&#8221; superimposed with a vertical line (or two, if you&#8217;re like me).  According to the New York Times, the pull [...]


No related posts.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.hulu.com">Hulu</a> <a href="http://blog.hulu.com/2010/03/02/a-fond-farewell/">announced</a> on March 2, 2010, that Comedy Central (owned by Viacom) is pulling <em><a href="http://www.hulu.com/the-daily-show-with-jon-stewart">The Daily Show</a></em> and <em><a href="http://www.hulu.com/the-colbert-report">The Colbert Report</a></em> from the website.  </p>
<p>Why?! The answer, it turns out, starts with an &#8220;S&#8221; superimposed with a vertical line (or <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/$#Drawn_with_two_vertical_lines">two</a>, if you&#8217;re like me).  According to the <a href="http://mediadecoder.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/03/02/viacom-will-take-daily-show-colbert-off-hulu/">New York Times</a>, the pull is the result of failed negotiations and the culmination of a contract term. Translation:  Colbert and Stewart weren&#8217;t worth their weight in Hulu&#8217;s advertising currency.  </p>
<p>Given the rising popularity of Hulu, I was pretty shocked that Colbert and Stewart weren&#8217;t making the bucks. However, even more disturbing is a post I came across on <a href="http://thresq.hollywoodreporter.com/2010/03/viacom-intends-to-go-after-bloggers-who-post-illegal-daily-show-clips.html">THR, Esq.</a>, which quotes Tony Fox, a Viacom/Comedy Central PR rep, with a rather pointed remark when asked &#8220;whether [Comedy Central] will now target websites and bloggers who post unauthorized clips from the show&#8221;:</p>
<blockquote><p>
&#8220;Yes, we intend to do so. My feeling is if (websites) are making money on our copyrighted content, then that is a problem.&#8221;
</p></blockquote>
<p>Too bad that fails to take into account that little thing called <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fair_use">Fair Use</a>, the same principle which allows comedy shows interlaced with news to take swipes at popular culture and media from other networks.  Fox&#8217;s statement does sounds somewhat unintentionally overinclusive&#8211;surely he didn&#8217;t mean <em>all</em> embedded video clips are instances of infringement. Even the players on <a href="http://www.thedailyshow.com">www.thedailyshow.com</a> and <a href="http://www.colbertnation.com">www.colbertnation.com</a> allow embedding.  Either way, the words were definitely provocative.    </p>
<p><a href="http://www.techdirt.com">Tech Dirt</a> <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100303/1900458405.shtml">followed up</a> with the company and Viacom has since clarified the remarks:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;We have always tried to be as permissive as possible when looking at what might be fair use, and we haven&#8217;t changed our approach at all. Frankly, fair use works for us. I can&#8217;t recall a time we&#8217;ve ever sued a blogger for the use of a Comedy Central clip, and there&#8217;s no reason to believe that would be more likely to today.&#8221;
</p></blockquote>
<p>This answer is much more along the lines of what I would have expected from a PR representative.  But does that make this PR fluff? Time will tell, I suppose. In the meantime, we&#8217;ll keep our eyes peeled for takedowns, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nastygram">nastygrams</a>, and suits.               </p>


<p>No related posts.</p><div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/TechnicallyLegal?a=IHfsNP-FJGI:vuOhnzI2v_c:yIl2AUoC8zA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/TechnicallyLegal?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/TechnicallyLegal?a=IHfsNP-FJGI:vuOhnzI2v_c:D7DqB2pKExk"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/TechnicallyLegal?i=IHfsNP-FJGI:vuOhnzI2v_c:D7DqB2pKExk" border="0"></img></a>
</div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TechnicallyLegal/~4/IHfsNP-FJGI" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.technicallylegal.org/hulu-loses-daily-show-and-colbert-viacom-to-sue-bloggers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.technicallylegal.org/hulu-loses-daily-show-and-colbert-viacom-to-sue-bloggers/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Yet Another Thomas-Rasset Trial, Set for Oct 2010</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TechnicallyLegal/~3/-_BNPnSjhmM/</link>
		<comments>http://www.technicallylegal.org/yet-another-thomas-rasset-trial-set-for-oct-2010/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 18:12:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David O'Brien</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.technicallylegal.org/?p=758</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This week, court documents were posted online indicating that Jammie Thomas-Rasset&#8217;s third trial is set for next October.  Hat tip to Ben Sheffner for reporting this on Monday on his Copyrights &#038; Campaigns blog.  
A few weeks back on our Podcast and blog (see here, here, and here), we covered the first part [...]


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://www.technicallylegal.org/damages-reduced-for-jammie-thomas-rasset/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Damages Reduced for Jammie Thomas-Rasset'>Damages Reduced for Jammie Thomas-Rasset</a> <small>The judge in the Jammie Thomas-Rasset case just reduced the...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.technicallylegal.org/riaa-offers-thomas-rasset-settlement-t-r-rejects/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: RIAA Offers Thomas-Rasset Settlement, T-R Rejects'>RIAA Offers Thomas-Rasset Settlement, T-R Rejects</a> <small>The RIAA offered to settle Jammie Thomas-Rasset&#8217;s case for $25,000...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.technicallylegal.org/tenebaum-trial-directed-verdict-granted/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Tenenbaum Trial: Directed Verdict Granted'>Tenenbaum Trial: Directed Verdict Granted</a> <small>Judge Nancy Gertner granted a motion for directed verdict (also...</small></li>
</ol>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This week, <a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/27666283/Jammie-Thomas-Rasset-Trial-Notice">court documents</a> were posted online indicating that Jammie Thomas-Rasset&#8217;s third trial is set for next October.  Hat tip to Ben Sheffner for reporting this on Monday on his <a href="http://copyrightsandcampaigns.blogspot.com/2010/03/third-jammie-thomas-rasset-trial-set.html">Copyrights &#038; Campaigns blog</a>.  </p>
<p>A few weeks back on our <a href="http://www.technicallylegal.org/podcast-34-some-relation/">Podcast</a> and blog (see <a href="http://www.technicallylegal.org/damages-reduced-for-jammie-thomas-rasset/">here</a>, <a href="http://www.technicallylegal.org/riaa-offers-thomas-rasset-settlement-t-r-rejects/">here</a>, and <a href="http://www.technicallylegal.org/riaa-update/">here</a>), we covered the first part of this story when Judge Davis <a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/25590909/Order-on-Jammie-Thomas-Rasset-s-motion-for-new-trial">granted</a> a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Remittitur"> remittitur</a> reducing the damages in the case from $1.92M ($80,000 per song infringed) to $54,000 ($2,250 per song infringed).  As we noted, once a remittitur has been granted, the opposing party has the option to either accept the reduction in damages or have a new trial.  They opted for the new trial, which will <em>only</em> concern the issue of damages.  </p>
<p>A bigger question, as we (and Sheffner), have noted is whether the ultimate amount of damages will be capped in the new trial at $54,000 (based on the remittitur) or whether the plaintiffs will be able to cover any amount within the spectrum of statutory damages under the copyright act.  </p>


<p>Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://www.technicallylegal.org/damages-reduced-for-jammie-thomas-rasset/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Damages Reduced for Jammie Thomas-Rasset'>Damages Reduced for Jammie Thomas-Rasset</a> <small>The judge in the Jammie Thomas-Rasset case just reduced the...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.technicallylegal.org/riaa-offers-thomas-rasset-settlement-t-r-rejects/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: RIAA Offers Thomas-Rasset Settlement, T-R Rejects'>RIAA Offers Thomas-Rasset Settlement, T-R Rejects</a> <small>The RIAA offered to settle Jammie Thomas-Rasset&#8217;s case for $25,000...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.technicallylegal.org/tenebaum-trial-directed-verdict-granted/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Tenenbaum Trial: Directed Verdict Granted'>Tenenbaum Trial: Directed Verdict Granted</a> <small>Judge Nancy Gertner granted a motion for directed verdict (also...</small></li>
</ol></p><div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/TechnicallyLegal?a=-_BNPnSjhmM:3ym4iOsqI3c:yIl2AUoC8zA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/TechnicallyLegal?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/TechnicallyLegal?a=-_BNPnSjhmM:3ym4iOsqI3c:D7DqB2pKExk"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/TechnicallyLegal?i=-_BNPnSjhmM:3ym4iOsqI3c:D7DqB2pKExk" border="0"></img></a>
</div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TechnicallyLegal/~4/-_BNPnSjhmM" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.technicallylegal.org/yet-another-thomas-rasset-trial-set-for-oct-2010/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.technicallylegal.org/yet-another-thomas-rasset-trial-set-for-oct-2010/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>The Supreme Court’s Copyright Ruling</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TechnicallyLegal/~3/Ms2jlWZx-F4/</link>
		<comments>http://www.technicallylegal.org/the-supreme-courts-copyright-ruling/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 14:08:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Snitkoff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SCOTUS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.technicallylegal.org/?p=756</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yesterday I mentioned on our twitter feed that the Supreme Court released an opinion relating to copyright law. Evan Brown, of Internet Cases and a regular TWiL panelist, wrote up a post that goes over the facts and ruling of the case. This case is a little dry, but if you&#8217;re interested, please hop over [...]


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://www.technicallylegal.org/bilski-at-the-supreme-court-today/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Bilski at the Supreme Court Today'>Bilski at the Supreme Court Today</a> <small>Today, the Supreme Court hears arguments on the Bilski case....</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.technicallylegal.org/de-fud-sotomayors-stance-on-copyright-infringement/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: De-FUD: Sotomayor&#8217;s Stance on Copyright Infringement'>De-FUD: Sotomayor&#8217;s Stance on Copyright Infringement</a> <small>Wired&#8217;s Threat Level blog posted an article titled &#8220;High Court...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.technicallylegal.org/de-fud-supreme-court-serves-up-nothing/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: De-FUD: Supreme Court Serves Up Nothing'>De-FUD: Supreme Court Serves Up Nothing</a> <small>Wired once again makes our De-FUD page. This time they...</small></li>
</ol>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yesterday I mentioned on our twitter feed that the Supreme Court released an opinion relating to copyright law. Evan Brown, of <a href = "http://blog.internetcases.com/">Internet Cases</a> and a regular <a href = "http://twit.tv/twil">TWiL</a> panelist, <a href = "http://blog.internetcases.com/2010/03/03/supreme-court-clarifies-basis-for-why-copyright-suits-over-unregistered-works-should-be-dismissed/">wrote up a post</a> that goes over the facts and ruling of the case. This case is a little dry, but if you&#8217;re interested, please hop over to his blog and check it out. </p>


<p>Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://www.technicallylegal.org/bilski-at-the-supreme-court-today/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Bilski at the Supreme Court Today'>Bilski at the Supreme Court Today</a> <small>Today, the Supreme Court hears arguments on the Bilski case....</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.technicallylegal.org/de-fud-sotomayors-stance-on-copyright-infringement/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: De-FUD: Sotomayor&#8217;s Stance on Copyright Infringement'>De-FUD: Sotomayor&#8217;s Stance on Copyright Infringement</a> <small>Wired&#8217;s Threat Level blog posted an article titled &#8220;High Court...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.technicallylegal.org/de-fud-supreme-court-serves-up-nothing/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: De-FUD: Supreme Court Serves Up Nothing'>De-FUD: Supreme Court Serves Up Nothing</a> <small>Wired once again makes our De-FUD page. This time they...</small></li>
</ol></p><div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/TechnicallyLegal?a=Ms2jlWZx-F4:YfQJaoYQan0:yIl2AUoC8zA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/TechnicallyLegal?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/TechnicallyLegal?a=Ms2jlWZx-F4:YfQJaoYQan0:D7DqB2pKExk"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/TechnicallyLegal?i=Ms2jlWZx-F4:YfQJaoYQan0:D7DqB2pKExk" border="0"></img></a>
</div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TechnicallyLegal/~4/Ms2jlWZx-F4" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.technicallylegal.org/the-supreme-courts-copyright-ruling/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.technicallylegal.org/the-supreme-courts-copyright-ruling/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Episode 39: Our Patented Newsfeed (Repost)</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TechnicallyLegal/~3/TO_C28NPaiE/</link>
		<comments>http://www.technicallylegal.org/episode-39-our-patented-newsfeed-repost/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 07:06:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Snitkoff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Podcast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DMCA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FTC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.technicallylegal.org/?p=754</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What damages for false DMCA takedown notices, employer liability for employee statements, Facebook Patents the newsfeed.
 Please download the podcast, or subscribe to the feed. Feel free to e-mail us with questions, suggestions or comments.
Damages in False DMCA takedown
Rare Ruling on Damages for Sending Bogus Copyright Takedown Notice&#8211;Lenz v. Universal
Rossi Case
FTC Guidelines on Employer Liability [...]


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://www.technicallylegal.org/technically-legal-podcast-episode-12/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Technically Legal Podcast: Episode 12'>Technically Legal Podcast: Episode 12</a> <small>RealDVD case, Microsoft and the i4i Patent, and Copying Websites....</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.technicallylegal.org/episode-25-wheres-my-ihop/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Episode 25: Where&#8217;s My IHOP'>Episode 25: Where&#8217;s My IHOP</a> <small>Bilski, International Copyright Treaty, and Using Facebook as an Alibi...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.technicallylegal.org/episode-40-goin-gaga/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Episode 40: Goin Gaga'>Episode 40: Goin Gaga</a> <small>Innocent infringement off the table, Apple sues HTC, and is...</small></li>
</ol>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What damages for false DMCA takedown notices, employer liability for employee statements, Facebook Patents the newsfeed.</p>
<p> Please <a href = "http://www.technicallylegal.org/podcast/Technically_Legal_Episode_39.mp3">download the podcast</a>, or <a href = "http://feeds2.feedburner.com/TechnicallyLegalPodcast">subscribe to the feed</a>. Feel free to <a href = "mailto:podcast@technicallylegal.org">e-mail us</a> with questions, suggestions or comments.</p>
<h3>Damages in False DMCA takedown</h3>
<p><a href = "http://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2010/02/standards_for_5.htm">Rare Ruling on Damages for Sending Bogus Copyright Takedown Notice&#8211;Lenz v. Universal</a><br />
<a href = "http://openjurist.org/391/f3d/1000/rossi-v-motion-picture-association-of-america-inc">Rossi Case</a></p>
<h3>FTC Guidelines on Employer Liability for Employee Blog Posts</h3>
<p><a href = "http://www.larkinhoffman.com/news/publication_detail.cfm?ARTICLE_ID=556">Potential Employer Liability for Employee Online Statements: New Guidelines by the Federal Trade Commission </a></p>
<h3>Facebook Patents the Newsfeed</h3>
<p><a href = "http://www.cnn.com/2010/TECH/02/26/facebook.patent/index.html?hpt=T2">Facebook&#8217;s news-feed patent could mean lawsuits</a><br />
<a href = "http://www.allfacebook.com/2010/02/facebook-feed-patent/">Facebook Patents The News Feed (Updated)</a><br />
<a href = "http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2&#038;Sect2=HITOFF&#038;p=1&#038;u=/netahtml/PTO/search-bool.html&#038;r=1&#038;f=G&#038;l=50&#038;co1=AND&#038;d=PTXT&#038;s1=Facebook.ASNM.&#038;OS=AN/Facebook&#038;RS=AN/Facebook">The Patent</a></p>
<p>UPDATE: There seems to have been a glitch with the first post. Hopefully this will fix it.</p>


<p>Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://www.technicallylegal.org/technically-legal-podcast-episode-12/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Technically Legal Podcast: Episode 12'>Technically Legal Podcast: Episode 12</a> <small>RealDVD case, Microsoft and the i4i Patent, and Copying Websites....</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.technicallylegal.org/episode-25-wheres-my-ihop/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Episode 25: Where&#8217;s My IHOP'>Episode 25: Where&#8217;s My IHOP</a> <small>Bilski, International Copyright Treaty, and Using Facebook as an Alibi...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.technicallylegal.org/episode-40-goin-gaga/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Episode 40: Goin Gaga'>Episode 40: Goin Gaga</a> <small>Innocent infringement off the table, Apple sues HTC, and is...</small></li>
</ol></p><div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/TechnicallyLegal?a=TO_C28NPaiE:04ZLSgCfPfU:yIl2AUoC8zA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/TechnicallyLegal?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/TechnicallyLegal?a=TO_C28NPaiE:04ZLSgCfPfU:D7DqB2pKExk"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/TechnicallyLegal?i=TO_C28NPaiE:04ZLSgCfPfU:D7DqB2pKExk" border="0"></img></a>
</div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TechnicallyLegal/~4/TO_C28NPaiE" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.technicallylegal.org/episode-39-our-patented-newsfeed-repost/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://www.technicallylegal.org/podcast/Technically_Legal_Episode_39.mp3" length="41706488" type="audio/mpeg" />
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.technicallylegal.org/episode-39-our-patented-newsfeed-repost/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Apple Sues HTC Over iPhone Patents</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TechnicallyLegal/~3/jpZczgeZLXA/</link>
		<comments>http://www.technicallylegal.org/apple-sues-htc-over-iphone-patents/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 15:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Snitkoff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HTC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.technicallylegal.org/?p=750</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is still breaking, so we&#8217;ll have more coverage as the details of the litigation emerge.
Apple has sued HTC for infringement of Apple patents relating to the user interface and underlying hardware of the iPhone. While I don&#8217;t have my hands on a complaint yet, there&#8217;s a fair bet it involves the patent for capacitive [...]


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://www.technicallylegal.org/apple-to-defend-nokia-lawsuit-vigorously/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Apple to Defend Nokia Lawsuit &#8220;Vigorously&#8221;'>Apple to Defend Nokia Lawsuit &#8220;Vigorously&#8221;</a> <small>Recently, Nokia filed a patent infringement suit against Apple, alleging...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.technicallylegal.org/apple-wins-injunction-against-psystar/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Apple Wins Injunction against Psystar'>Apple Wins Injunction against Psystar</a> <small>AppleInsider reported that Apple won a permanent injunction against Psystar....</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.technicallylegal.org/bilski-isnt-about-software-patents/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Bilski Is(n&#8217;t) About Software Patents'>Bilski Is(n&#8217;t) About Software Patents</a> <small>In Podcast 2, we spent a good amount of time...</small></li>
</ol>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is still breaking, so we&#8217;ll have more coverage as the details of the litigation emerge.</p>
<p><a href = "http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/02/apple-sues-htc-for-infringing-20-iphone-patents/">Apple has sued HTC</a> for infringement of Apple patents relating to the user interface and underlying hardware of the iPhone. While I don&#8217;t have my hands on a complaint yet, there&#8217;s a fair bet it involves the <a href = "http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/17/apple-granted-patent-on-capacitive-multitouch-displays/">patent for capacitive touch screens</a> Apple was recently awarded.</p>
<p>UPDATE: You can now <a href = "http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20100302/apples-suits-against-htc-both-documents/">download the relevant documents.</a> I&#8217;ll try to get a look at them later today or this evening.</p>


<p>Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://www.technicallylegal.org/apple-to-defend-nokia-lawsuit-vigorously/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Apple to Defend Nokia Lawsuit &#8220;Vigorously&#8221;'>Apple to Defend Nokia Lawsuit &#8220;Vigorously&#8221;</a> <small>Recently, Nokia filed a patent infringement suit against Apple, alleging...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.technicallylegal.org/apple-wins-injunction-against-psystar/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Apple Wins Injunction against Psystar'>Apple Wins Injunction against Psystar</a> <small>AppleInsider reported that Apple won a permanent injunction against Psystar....</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.technicallylegal.org/bilski-isnt-about-software-patents/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Bilski Is(n&#8217;t) About Software Patents'>Bilski Is(n&#8217;t) About Software Patents</a> <small>In Podcast 2, we spent a good amount of time...</small></li>
</ol></p><div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/TechnicallyLegal?a=jpZczgeZLXA:jtKS2n_6zxs:yIl2AUoC8zA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/TechnicallyLegal?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/TechnicallyLegal?a=jpZczgeZLXA:jtKS2n_6zxs:D7DqB2pKExk"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/TechnicallyLegal?i=jpZczgeZLXA:jtKS2n_6zxs:D7DqB2pKExk" border="0"></img></a>
</div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TechnicallyLegal/~4/jpZczgeZLXA" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.technicallylegal.org/apple-sues-htc-over-iphone-patents/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.technicallylegal.org/apple-sues-htc-over-iphone-patents/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Episode 38: What’s the Buzz?</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TechnicallyLegal/~3/r9AGJ7Ey9Fg/</link>
		<comments>http://www.technicallylegal.org/episode-38-whats-the-buzz/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 03:59:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Snitkoff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Podcast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fourth Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.technicallylegal.org/?p=743</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google Buzz Class Action Lawsuit, Social Media and Burglary, and Searches of your P2P share folders.
 Please download the podcast, or subscribe to the feed. Feel free to e-mail us with questions, suggestions or comments.
Google Buzz Class Action
Local class action complaint filed over Google Buzz
Social Media and Burglary
Your Rights Online: I Use Twitter, Please Rob [...]


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://www.technicallylegal.org/can-the-police-find-your-phone/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Can the Police Find Your Phone?'>Can the Police Find Your Phone?</a> <small>Recently Mac developer and Somerville native Daniel Jalkut had his...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.technicallylegal.org/google-class-action/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Google Class Action'>Google Class Action</a> <small>Eric Goldman reports on a class action law suit filed...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.technicallylegal.org/de-fud-ma-gps-tracking-case/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: De-FUD: MA GPS Tracking Case'>De-FUD: MA GPS Tracking Case</a> <small>Not to bite the hand that feeds us, but a...</small></li>
</ol>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google Buzz Class Action Lawsuit, Social Media and Burglary, and Searches of your P2P share folders.</p>
<p> Please <a href = "http://www.technicallylegal.org/podcast/Technically_Legal_Episode_38.mp3">download the podcast</a>, or <a href = "http://feeds2.feedburner.com/TechnicallyLegalPodcast">subscribe to the feed</a>. Feel free to <a href = "mailto:podcast@technicallylegal.org">e-mail us</a> with questions, suggestions or comments.</p>
<h3>Google Buzz Class Action</h3>
<p><a href = "http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/blogs/techchron/detail?entry_id=57438&#038;tsp=1">Local class action complaint filed over Google Buzz</a></p>
<h3>Social Media and Burglary</h3>
<p><a href = "http://yro.slashdot.org/story/10/02/18/1340202/I-Use-Twitter-Please-Rob-Me">Your Rights Online: I Use Twitter, Please Rob Me</a><br />
<a href = "http://pleaserobme.com/">http://pleaserobme.com/</a></p>
<h3>Search Warrants and Share Folders</h3>
<p><a href = "http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2010/02/feds-can-search-seize-p2p-files-without-warrant/?utm_source=feedburner&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=Feed:+wired27b+%28Blog+-+27B+Stroke+6+%28Threat+Level%29%29">Feds Can Search, Seize P2P Files Without Warrant</a></p>


<p>Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://www.technicallylegal.org/can-the-police-find-your-phone/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Can the Police Find Your Phone?'>Can the Police Find Your Phone?</a> <small>Recently Mac developer and Somerville native Daniel Jalkut had his...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.technicallylegal.org/google-class-action/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Google Class Action'>Google Class Action</a> <small>Eric Goldman reports on a class action law suit filed...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.technicallylegal.org/de-fud-ma-gps-tracking-case/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: De-FUD: MA GPS Tracking Case'>De-FUD: MA GPS Tracking Case</a> <small>Not to bite the hand that feeds us, but a...</small></li>
</ol></p><div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/TechnicallyLegal?a=r9AGJ7Ey9Fg:_RFKlByQSo8:yIl2AUoC8zA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/TechnicallyLegal?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/TechnicallyLegal?a=r9AGJ7Ey9Fg:_RFKlByQSo8:D7DqB2pKExk"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/TechnicallyLegal?i=r9AGJ7Ey9Fg:_RFKlByQSo8:D7DqB2pKExk" border="0"></img></a>
</div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TechnicallyLegal/~4/r9AGJ7Ey9Fg" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.technicallylegal.org/episode-38-whats-the-buzz/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://www.technicallylegal.org/podcast/Technically_Legal_Episode_38.mp3" length="24120446" type="audio/mpeg" />
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.technicallylegal.org/episode-38-whats-the-buzz/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Redbox Caves As Well</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TechnicallyLegal/~3/Y-Lac74-A2g/</link>
		<comments>http://www.technicallylegal.org/redbox-caves-as-well/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 02:53:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Snitkoff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RedBox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Warner]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.technicallylegal.org/?p=741</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We&#8217;ve covered the Redbox suit before and are a little sad to report that they&#8217;ve agreed to Warner&#8217;s demands not to rent new releases for 28 days. Warner hopes that this will boost sales of DVDs. Presumably because if people didn&#8217;t want to see a movie in the theater, they will run out and buy [...]


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://www.technicallylegal.org/charges-dropped-against-party-filmer/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Charges Dropped Against Party Filmer'>Charges Dropped Against Party Filmer</a> <small>We mentioned earlier that an Illinois woman was detained and...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.technicallylegal.org/filming-anything-in-a-movie-theater-or-bestbuy-is-illegal-in-illinois/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Filming Anything in a Movie Theater or BestBuy is Illegal in Illinois'>Filming Anything in a Movie Theater or BestBuy is Illegal in Illinois</a> <small>A 22 year-old Chicago woman was arrested and charged with...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.technicallylegal.org/why-netflix-caved/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Why Netflix Caved'>Why Netflix Caved</a> <small>Netflix announced today that it will not rent Warner DVDs...</small></li>
</ol>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href = "http://www.technicallylegal.org/technically-legal-podcast-episode-13/">We&#8217;ve covered the Redbox suit before</a> and are a little sad to report that <a href = "http://techdirt.com/articles/20100216/1449188186.shtml">they&#8217;ve agreed to Warner&#8217;s demands</a> not to rent new releases for 28 days. Warner hopes that this will boost sales of DVDs. Presumably because if people didn&#8217;t want to see a movie in the theater, they will run out and buy the DVD, rather than just waiting another month before renting it. That makes sense? Right?</p>
<p>This announcement comes on the heels of <a href = "http://www.technicallylegal.org/why-netflix-caved/">Netflix caving to Warner&#8217;s demands</a> in January.</p>


<p>Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://www.technicallylegal.org/charges-dropped-against-party-filmer/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Charges Dropped Against Party Filmer'>Charges Dropped Against Party Filmer</a> <small>We mentioned earlier that an Illinois woman was detained and...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.technicallylegal.org/filming-anything-in-a-movie-theater-or-bestbuy-is-illegal-in-illinois/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Filming Anything in a Movie Theater or BestBuy is Illegal in Illinois'>Filming Anything in a Movie Theater or BestBuy is Illegal in Illinois</a> <small>A 22 year-old Chicago woman was arrested and charged with...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.technicallylegal.org/why-netflix-caved/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Why Netflix Caved'>Why Netflix Caved</a> <small>Netflix announced today that it will not rent Warner DVDs...</small></li>
</ol></p><div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/TechnicallyLegal?a=Y-Lac74-A2g:ta8ATRFgNOs:yIl2AUoC8zA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/TechnicallyLegal?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/TechnicallyLegal?a=Y-Lac74-A2g:ta8ATRFgNOs:D7DqB2pKExk"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/TechnicallyLegal?i=Y-Lac74-A2g:ta8ATRFgNOs:D7DqB2pKExk" border="0"></img></a>
</div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TechnicallyLegal/~4/Y-Lac74-A2g" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.technicallylegal.org/redbox-caves-as-well/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.technicallylegal.org/redbox-caves-as-well/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Episode 37: Largely Copyright</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TechnicallyLegal/~3/xjtpTDwyup4/</link>
		<comments>http://www.technicallylegal.org/episode-37-largely-copyright/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 03:00:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Snitkoff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Podcast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FBI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fourth Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Streaming]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.technicallylegal.org/?p=739</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[White House and Copyright, Streaming the Olympics, FBI and the Fourth Amendment
Please download the podcast, or subscribe to the feed. Feel free to e-mail us with questions, suggestions or comments.
White House and Copyrights
White House Makes Full Copyright Claim on Photos
Another Obama right-of-publicity violation; NY Times gets results!
Streaming the Olympics
Why you can&#8217;t see live streaming of [...]


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://www.technicallylegal.org/can-the-police-find-your-phone/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Can the Police Find Your Phone?'>Can the Police Find Your Phone?</a> <small>Recently Mac developer and Somerville native Daniel Jalkut had his...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.technicallylegal.org/another-e-mail-privacy-case/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Another E-mail Privacy Case'>Another E-mail Privacy Case</a> <small>The EFF has a great post up comparing the Oregon...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.technicallylegal.org/no-tweeting-in-federal-court/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: No Tweeting in Federal Court'>No Tweeting in Federal Court</a> <small>A Federal Court has found that live tweeting courtroom events...</small></li>
</ol>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>White House and Copyright, Streaming the Olympics, FBI and the Fourth Amendment</p>
<p>Please <a href = "http://www.technicallylegal.org/podcast/Technically_Legal_Episode_37.mp3">download the podcast</a>, or <a href = "http://feeds2.feedburner.com/TechnicallyLegalPodcast">subscribe to the feed</a>. Feel free to <a href = "mailto:podcast@technicallylegal.org">e-mail us</a> with questions, suggestions or comments.</p>
<h3>White House and Copyrights</h3>
<p><a href = "http://themoderatevoice.com/62020/white-house-makes-full-copyright-claim-on-photos/">White House Makes Full Copyright Claim on Photos</a><br />
<a href = "http://copyrightsandcampaigns.blogspot.com/2010/02/another-obama-right-of-publicity.html">Another Obama right-of-publicity violation; NY Times gets results!</a></p>
<h3>Streaming the Olympics</h3>
<p><a href = "http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/olympics/2011023126_olycanadiantv09.html">Why you can&#8217;t see live streaming of Olympics — at least not legally</a></p>
<h3>FBI and the Fourth Amendment</h3>
<p><a href = "http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2010/02/11/on-the-fbi-the-fourth-amendment-and-your-cell-phone/">On the FBI, the Fourth Amendment and Your Cell Phone</a></p>


<p>Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://www.technicallylegal.org/can-the-police-find-your-phone/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Can the Police Find Your Phone?'>Can the Police Find Your Phone?</a> <small>Recently Mac developer and Somerville native Daniel Jalkut had his...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.technicallylegal.org/another-e-mail-privacy-case/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Another E-mail Privacy Case'>Another E-mail Privacy Case</a> <small>The EFF has a great post up comparing the Oregon...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.technicallylegal.org/no-tweeting-in-federal-court/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: No Tweeting in Federal Court'>No Tweeting in Federal Court</a> <small>A Federal Court has found that live tweeting courtroom events...</small></li>
</ol></p><div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/TechnicallyLegal?a=xjtpTDwyup4:yC8uZKb-N8U:yIl2AUoC8zA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/TechnicallyLegal?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/TechnicallyLegal?a=xjtpTDwyup4:yC8uZKb-N8U:D7DqB2pKExk"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/TechnicallyLegal?i=xjtpTDwyup4:yC8uZKb-N8U:D7DqB2pKExk" border="0"></img></a>
</div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TechnicallyLegal/~4/xjtpTDwyup4" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.technicallylegal.org/episode-37-largely-copyright/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://www.technicallylegal.org/podcast/Technically_Legal_Episode_37.mp3" length="25798041" type="audio/mpeg" />
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.technicallylegal.org/episode-37-largely-copyright/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>This Week in Law #47: Felix Unger Wisdom</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TechnicallyLegal/~3/dERRT0gO384/</link>
		<comments>http://www.technicallylegal.org/this-week-in-law-47-felix-unger-wisdom/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2010 17:19:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David O'Brien</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guest Appearances]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TWiL]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.technicallylegal.org/?p=733</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ben and I appeared as guest panelists yesterday, February 12, 2010, on This Week in Law, which is part of the TWiT network with fellow attorneys Ernie Svenson and Denise Howell.  We had a lot of fun doing it and hit some great topics.  Be sure to check it out.  The audio podcast should be [...]


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://www.technicallylegal.org/the-supreme-courts-copyright-ruling/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: The Supreme Court&#8217;s Copyright Ruling'>The Supreme Court&#8217;s Copyright Ruling</a> <small>Yesterday I mentioned on our twitter feed that the Supreme...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.technicallylegal.org/delay-in-broadcast-of-prop-8-trial/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Delay in broadcast of Prop. 8 trial'>Delay in broadcast of Prop. 8 trial</a> <small>The Supreme Court has, at least temporarily, established a two...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.technicallylegal.org/scotus-kills-prop-8-trial-broadcast/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: SCOTUS Kills Prop. 8 Trial Broadcast'>SCOTUS Kills Prop. 8 Trial Broadcast</a> <small>In a 5-4 decision the Supreme Court said that the...</small></li>
</ol>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: left;">Ben and I appeared as guest panelists yesterday, February 12, 2010, on <a type="&quot;application/x-shockwave-flash&quot;" href="&lt;embed src=" target="_blank">This Week in Law</a>, which is part of the <a href="http://twit.tv" target="_blank">TWiT network</a> with fellow attorneys <a href="http://www.ernietheattorney.net/" target="_blank">Ernie Svenson</a> and <a href="http://www.bagandbaggage.com/" target="_blank">Denise Howell</a>.  We had a lot of fun doing it and hit some great <a href="http://delicious.com/thisweekinlaw/47" target="_blank">topics</a>.  Be sure to check it out.  The audio podcast should be available early next week and the (unedited) video broadcast is available on twil.blip.tv (and below).</p>
<p><code>
<p style="text-align: center;"><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="480" height="300" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="src" value="http://blip.tv/play/AYHFoCIC" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="480" height="300" src="http://blip.tv/play/AYHFoCIC" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
<p></code></p>


<p>Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://www.technicallylegal.org/the-supreme-courts-copyright-ruling/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: The Supreme Court&#8217;s Copyright Ruling'>The Supreme Court&#8217;s Copyright Ruling</a> <small>Yesterday I mentioned on our twitter feed that the Supreme...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.technicallylegal.org/delay-in-broadcast-of-prop-8-trial/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Delay in broadcast of Prop. 8 trial'>Delay in broadcast of Prop. 8 trial</a> <small>The Supreme Court has, at least temporarily, established a two...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://www.technicallylegal.org/scotus-kills-prop-8-trial-broadcast/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: SCOTUS Kills Prop. 8 Trial Broadcast'>SCOTUS Kills Prop. 8 Trial Broadcast</a> <small>In a 5-4 decision the Supreme Court said that the...</small></li>
</ol></p><div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/TechnicallyLegal?a=dERRT0gO384:1MxnFPqz7C0:yIl2AUoC8zA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/TechnicallyLegal?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/TechnicallyLegal?a=dERRT0gO384:1MxnFPqz7C0:D7DqB2pKExk"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/TechnicallyLegal?i=dERRT0gO384:1MxnFPqz7C0:D7DqB2pKExk" border="0"></img></a>
</div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TechnicallyLegal/~4/dERRT0gO384" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.technicallylegal.org/this-week-in-law-47-felix-unger-wisdom/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.technicallylegal.org/this-week-in-law-47-felix-unger-wisdom/</feedburner:origLink></item>
	</channel>
</rss>
