<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">
<channel>
	<title>Comments for </title>
	
	<link>http://storagenerve.com</link>
	<description />
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2010 08:19:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/StoragenerveComments" /><feedburner:info uri="storagenervecomments" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><item>
		<title>Comment on EMC Clariion FLARE Code Operating Environment by Alvin R</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/StoragenerveComments/~3/0UtDIX33WG8/</link>
		<dc:creator>Alvin R</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2010 08:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://storagenerve.wordpress.com/2009/01/06/emc-clariion-flare-code-operating-environment/#comment-680</guid>
		<description>Hi 
Is there any one can confirmed the EMC performance after the flare core update? 
just come a cross "Read cache" size settings reduced after a  FLARE code upgrade

Thanks 
Alvin  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi<br />
Is there any one can confirmed the EMC performance after the flare core update?<br />
just come a cross &#8220;Read cache&#8221; size settings reduced after a  FLARE code upgrade</p>
<p>Thanks<br />
Alvin</p>
<div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/StoragenerveComments?a=0UtDIX33WG8:jfPgqsuzYM4:yIl2AUoC8zA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/StoragenerveComments?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/StoragenerveComments?a=0UtDIX33WG8:jfPgqsuzYM4:TishOYyPd2w"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/StoragenerveComments?i=0UtDIX33WG8:jfPgqsuzYM4:TishOYyPd2w" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/StoragenerveComments?a=0UtDIX33WG8:jfPgqsuzYM4:TzevzKxY174"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/StoragenerveComments?d=TzevzKxY174" border="0"></img></a>
</div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/StoragenerveComments/~4/0UtDIX33WG8" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://storagenerve.com/2009/01/06/emc-clariion-flare-code-operating-environment/comment-page-1/#comment-680</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on EMC Symmetrix / DMX SRDF Setup by Tallapaka_srinivas</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/StoragenerveComments/~3/P6WGGnxb3uM/</link>
		<dc:creator>Tallapaka_srinivas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2010 05:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://storagenerve.wordpress.com/2009/01/26/emc-symmetrix-dmx-srdf-setup/#comment-679</guid>
		<description>This is a nice blog .. Keep posting</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a nice blog .. Keep posting</p>
<div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/StoragenerveComments?a=P6WGGnxb3uM:igNMYbH6fsI:yIl2AUoC8zA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/StoragenerveComments?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/StoragenerveComments?a=P6WGGnxb3uM:igNMYbH6fsI:TishOYyPd2w"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/StoragenerveComments?i=P6WGGnxb3uM:igNMYbH6fsI:TishOYyPd2w" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/StoragenerveComments?a=P6WGGnxb3uM:igNMYbH6fsI:TzevzKxY174"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/StoragenerveComments?d=TzevzKxY174" border="0"></img></a>
</div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/StoragenerveComments/~4/P6WGGnxb3uM" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://storagenerve.com/2009/01/26/emc-symmetrix-dmx-srdf-setup/comment-page-1/#comment-679</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Storage – Utilization, efficiency, cost, dedup, TP, virtualization, ZPR, compression or call it Economics by storagenerve</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/StoragenerveComments/~3/rqKT4JSbhhE/</link>
		<dc:creator>storagenerve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2010 05:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://storagenerve.com/?p=3445#comment-673</guid>
		<description>Sure, here is what i know about you so far.....

The Dude (the.dude@emc.com)
75.237.68.120

If you would like me to post your comments on the blog, you have to live up to the rules of social media. DO NOT EXPECT ME TO POST YOUR COMMENTS ON MY BLOG WITH YOUR FAKE DISQUS HANDLE AND FAKE EMAIL ADDRESS. 

Sure I have seen your comments from fake email addresses like john.stevens@hds.com and others in the past. You need to disclose who you work for and who you are before i am sure any blogger will publish comments on their respective blogs. 



Have seen your comments in the past from various fake email addresses.


</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sure, here is what i know about you so far&#8230;..</p>
<p>The Dude (the.dude@emc.com)<br />
75.237.68.120</p>
<p>If you would like me to post your comments on the blog, you have to live up to the rules of social media. DO NOT EXPECT ME TO POST YOUR COMMENTS ON MY BLOG WITH YOUR FAKE DISQUS HANDLE AND FAKE EMAIL ADDRESS. </p>
<p>Sure I have seen your comments from fake email addresses like <a href="mailto:john.stevens@hds.com">john.stevens@hds.com</a> and others in the past. You need to disclose who you work for and who you are before i am sure any blogger will publish comments on their respective blogs. </p>
<p>Have seen your comments in the past from various fake email addresses.</p>
<div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/StoragenerveComments?a=rqKT4JSbhhE:c2tGkWmch-8:yIl2AUoC8zA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/StoragenerveComments?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/StoragenerveComments?a=rqKT4JSbhhE:c2tGkWmch-8:TishOYyPd2w"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/StoragenerveComments?i=rqKT4JSbhhE:c2tGkWmch-8:TishOYyPd2w" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/StoragenerveComments?a=rqKT4JSbhhE:c2tGkWmch-8:TzevzKxY174"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/StoragenerveComments?d=TzevzKxY174" border="0"></img></a>
</div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/StoragenerveComments/~4/rqKT4JSbhhE" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://storagenerve.com/2010/08/03/storage-utilization-efficiency-cost-dedup-tp-virtualization-zpr-compression-or-call-it-economics/comment-page-1/#comment-673</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Storage – Utilization, efficiency, cost, dedup, TP, virtualization, ZPR, compression or call it Economics by storagenerve</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/StoragenerveComments/~3/H0gStuDybnI/</link>
		<dc:creator>storagenerve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2010 05:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://storagenerve.com/?p=3445#comment-676</guid>
		<description>Thanks for reading my blog. 

Its fact vs reality. Its great customers are implementing TP across the board for a 10PB environment, i am sure they have to evaluate various manufacturers as part of business requirements determining which products and solutions closely match those. 

But said that, this post is talking about recommendations about implementing TP, Dedup and other known technologies, if a customer is already implementing those, its absolutely good for them. The problem is its not across the board. 

The vendors that implemented a 10PB environment with TP should write up a case story and publish it along with the name of the customer and showing the value they bring on the table. 

I would highly recommend that in the future you use a real legitimate email address and your disqus handle if you expect me to publish your comments on my blog. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for reading my blog. </p>
<p>Its fact vs reality. Its great customers are implementing TP across the board for a 10PB environment, i am sure they have to evaluate various manufacturers as part of business requirements determining which products and solutions closely match those. </p>
<p>But said that, this post is talking about recommendations about implementing TP, Dedup and other known technologies, if a customer is already implementing those, its absolutely good for them. The problem is its not across the board. </p>
<p>The vendors that implemented a 10PB environment with TP should write up a case story and publish it along with the name of the customer and showing the value they bring on the table. </p>
<p>I would highly recommend that in the future you use a real legitimate email address and your disqus handle if you expect me to publish your comments on my blog.</p>
<div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/StoragenerveComments?a=H0gStuDybnI:DG-U9FAVEOQ:yIl2AUoC8zA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/StoragenerveComments?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/StoragenerveComments?a=H0gStuDybnI:DG-U9FAVEOQ:TishOYyPd2w"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/StoragenerveComments?i=H0gStuDybnI:DG-U9FAVEOQ:TishOYyPd2w" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/StoragenerveComments?a=H0gStuDybnI:DG-U9FAVEOQ:TzevzKxY174"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/StoragenerveComments?d=TzevzKxY174" border="0"></img></a>
</div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/StoragenerveComments/~4/H0gStuDybnI" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://storagenerve.com/2010/08/03/storage-utilization-efficiency-cost-dedup-tp-virtualization-zpr-compression-or-call-it-economics/comment-page-1/#comment-676</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Storage – Utilization, efficiency, cost, dedup, TP, virtualization, ZPR, compression or call it Economics by storagenerve</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/StoragenerveComments/~3/lG3VgMGWhf4/</link>
		<dc:creator>storagenerve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2010 05:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://storagenerve.com/?p=3445#comment-675</guid>
		<description>Thanks for reading my blog. 

Its fact vs reality. Its great customers are implementing TP across the board for a 10PB environment, i am sure they have to evaluate various manufacturers as part of business requirements determining which products and solutions closely match those. 

But said that, this post is talking about recommendations about implementing TP, Dedup and other known technologies, if a customer is already implementing those, its absolutely good for them. The problem is its not across the board. 

The vendors that implemented a 10PB environment with TP should write up a case story and publish it along with the name of the customer and showing the value they bring on the table. 

I would highly recommend that in the future you use a real legitimate email address and your disqus handle if you expect me to publish your comments on my blog. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for reading my blog. </p>
<p>Its fact vs reality. Its great customers are implementing TP across the board for a 10PB environment, i am sure they have to evaluate various manufacturers as part of business requirements determining which products and solutions closely match those. </p>
<p>But said that, this post is talking about recommendations about implementing TP, Dedup and other known technologies, if a customer is already implementing those, its absolutely good for them. The problem is its not across the board. </p>
<p>The vendors that implemented a 10PB environment with TP should write up a case story and publish it along with the name of the customer and showing the value they bring on the table. </p>
<p>I would highly recommend that in the future you use a real legitimate email address and your disqus handle if you expect me to publish your comments on my blog.</p>
<div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/StoragenerveComments?a=lG3VgMGWhf4:3HuIhXFibPQ:yIl2AUoC8zA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/StoragenerveComments?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/StoragenerveComments?a=lG3VgMGWhf4:3HuIhXFibPQ:TishOYyPd2w"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/StoragenerveComments?i=lG3VgMGWhf4:3HuIhXFibPQ:TishOYyPd2w" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/StoragenerveComments?a=lG3VgMGWhf4:3HuIhXFibPQ:TzevzKxY174"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/StoragenerveComments?d=TzevzKxY174" border="0"></img></a>
</div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/StoragenerveComments/~4/lG3VgMGWhf4" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://storagenerve.com/2010/08/03/storage-utilization-efficiency-cost-dedup-tp-virtualization-zpr-compression-or-call-it-economics/comment-page-1/#comment-675</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Storage – Utilization, efficiency, cost, dedup, TP, virtualization, ZPR, compression or call it Economics by storagenerve</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/StoragenerveComments/~3/5EqoUUdfEgc/</link>
		<dc:creator>storagenerve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2010 05:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://storagenerve.com/?p=3445#comment-674</guid>
		<description>Thanks for reading my blog. 

Its fact vs reality. Its great customers are implementing TP across the board for a 10PB environment, i am sure they have to evaluate various manufacturers as part of business requirements determining which products and solutions closely match those. 

But said that, this post is talking about recommendations about implementing TP, Dedup and other known technologies, if a customer is already implementing those, its absolutely good for them. The problem is its not across the board. 

The vendors that implemented a 10PB environment with TP should write up a case story and publish it along with the name of the customer and showing the value they bring on the table. 

I would highly recommend that in the future you use a real legitimate email address and your disqus handle if you expect me to publish your comments on my blog. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for reading my blog. </p>
<p>Its fact vs reality. Its great customers are implementing TP across the board for a 10PB environment, i am sure they have to evaluate various manufacturers as part of business requirements determining which products and solutions closely match those. </p>
<p>But said that, this post is talking about recommendations about implementing TP, Dedup and other known technologies, if a customer is already implementing those, its absolutely good for them. The problem is its not across the board. </p>
<p>The vendors that implemented a 10PB environment with TP should write up a case story and publish it along with the name of the customer and showing the value they bring on the table. </p>
<p>I would highly recommend that in the future you use a real legitimate email address and your disqus handle if you expect me to publish your comments on my blog.</p>
<div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/StoragenerveComments?a=5EqoUUdfEgc:L4PPcmmIBVc:yIl2AUoC8zA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/StoragenerveComments?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/StoragenerveComments?a=5EqoUUdfEgc:L4PPcmmIBVc:TishOYyPd2w"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/StoragenerveComments?i=5EqoUUdfEgc:L4PPcmmIBVc:TishOYyPd2w" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/StoragenerveComments?a=5EqoUUdfEgc:L4PPcmmIBVc:TzevzKxY174"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/StoragenerveComments?d=TzevzKxY174" border="0"></img></a>
</div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/StoragenerveComments/~4/5EqoUUdfEgc" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://storagenerve.com/2010/08/03/storage-utilization-efficiency-cost-dedup-tp-virtualization-zpr-compression-or-call-it-economics/comment-page-1/#comment-674</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Storage – Utilization, efficiency, cost, dedup, TP, virtualization, ZPR, compression or call it Economics by The Dude</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/StoragenerveComments/~3/U7x0VaS4WdQ/</link>
		<dc:creator>The Dude</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Aug 2010 19:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://storagenerve.com/?p=3445#comment-670</guid>
		<description>It's one thing to read tech manuals and go to trade shows, it is another to be out in the field were the real work goes on.

I bet you wont post that on your filtered web site.

A real Blog is wide open were people can post there comments freely.

I have posted comments before but they never reach your pages.

It is the sign of a HACK, sorry but it is the truth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s one thing to read tech manuals and go to trade shows, it is another to be out in the field were the real work goes on.</p>
<p>I bet you wont post that on your filtered web site.</p>
<p>A real Blog is wide open were people can post there comments freely.</p>
<p>I have posted comments before but they never reach your pages.</p>
<p>It is the sign of a HACK, sorry but it is the truth.</p>
<div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/StoragenerveComments?a=U7x0VaS4WdQ:hg0aky1jz9Y:yIl2AUoC8zA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/StoragenerveComments?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/StoragenerveComments?a=U7x0VaS4WdQ:hg0aky1jz9Y:TishOYyPd2w"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/StoragenerveComments?i=U7x0VaS4WdQ:hg0aky1jz9Y:TishOYyPd2w" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/StoragenerveComments?a=U7x0VaS4WdQ:hg0aky1jz9Y:TzevzKxY174"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/StoragenerveComments?d=TzevzKxY174" border="0"></img></a>
</div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/StoragenerveComments/~4/U7x0VaS4WdQ" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://storagenerve.com/2010/08/03/storage-utilization-efficiency-cost-dedup-tp-virtualization-zpr-compression-or-call-it-economics/comment-page-1/#comment-670</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Storage – Utilization, efficiency, cost, dedup, TP, virtualization, ZPR, compression or call it Economics by The Dude</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/StoragenerveComments/~3/EEJNLDt358w/</link>
		<dc:creator>The Dude</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Aug 2010 19:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://storagenerve.com/?p=3445#comment-671</guid>
		<description>I would have to strongly disagree with you. i work in the enterprise storage space and see it in use every day. i have on customer who just thinned out a 10PB global storage environemt. Of course the only vendor that could deliver was EMC on VMAX. They tried on USP-V with limited success, but once they migrated their environment to VMAX VP they created thick to thin clones and then ran Zero page reclaim. I believe you should reconsider your statement, or start talking with enterprise class customers. I will agree that in the mid tier space it is not that common, but the savings achieved with thinning out a mid tier environment are not enough to justify the effort required to do so. If you want to talk about DeDup then you are completely wrong. Dedup is everywhere. The savings are immediate and easily justify the cost of such technologies as DataDomain. The ROI is real.
The Storage Socialist</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would have to strongly disagree with you. i work in the enterprise storage space and see it in use every day. i have on customer who just thinned out a 10PB global storage environemt. Of course the only vendor that could deliver was EMC on VMAX. They tried on USP-V with limited success, but once they migrated their environment to VMAX VP they created thick to thin clones and then ran Zero page reclaim. I believe you should reconsider your statement, or start talking with enterprise class customers. I will agree that in the mid tier space it is not that common, but the savings achieved with thinning out a mid tier environment are not enough to justify the effort required to do so. If you want to talk about DeDup then you are completely wrong. Dedup is everywhere. The savings are immediate and easily justify the cost of such technologies as DataDomain. The ROI is real.<br />
The Storage Socialist</p>
<div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/StoragenerveComments?a=EEJNLDt358w:w86cYL-3v_g:yIl2AUoC8zA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/StoragenerveComments?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/StoragenerveComments?a=EEJNLDt358w:w86cYL-3v_g:TishOYyPd2w"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/StoragenerveComments?i=EEJNLDt358w:w86cYL-3v_g:TishOYyPd2w" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/StoragenerveComments?a=EEJNLDt358w:w86cYL-3v_g:TzevzKxY174"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/StoragenerveComments?d=TzevzKxY174" border="0"></img></a>
</div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/StoragenerveComments/~4/EEJNLDt358w" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://storagenerve.com/2010/08/03/storage-utilization-efficiency-cost-dedup-tp-virtualization-zpr-compression-or-call-it-economics/comment-page-1/#comment-671</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Storage Federation by Ken Wood</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/StoragenerveComments/~3/BYlWbJGAo4c/</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken Wood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Aug 2010 16:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://storagenerve.com/?p=3396#comment-665</guid>
		<description>Hi Devang! I enjoyed this blog and the comparisons between storage virtualization technology with HDS' USP-V and EMC's VPLEX. In fact, I've made it the topic of my recent blog at, 

http://blogs.hds.com/michael/2010/08/talking-about-storage-virtualization.html#more-3718 

You are asking the right questions and I've responded to a few of them directly in my blog and one of them in a response to a comment from Nigel. I may actually address a few more of your questions in a future blog. Great stuff and keep up the good work.

Best regards,
Ken Wood with HDS
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Devang! I enjoyed this blog and the comparisons between storage virtualization technology with HDS&#8217; USP-V and EMC&#8217;s VPLEX. In fact, I&#8217;ve made it the topic of my recent blog at, </p>
<p><a href="http://blogs.hds.com/michael/2010/08/talking-about-storage-virtualization.html#more-3718" rel="nofollow">http://blogs.hds.com/michael/2010/08/talking-about-storage-virtualization.html#more-3718</a> </p>
<p>You are asking the right questions and I&#8217;ve responded to a few of them directly in my blog and one of them in a response to a comment from Nigel. I may actually address a few more of your questions in a future blog. Great stuff and keep up the good work.</p>
<p>Best regards,<br />
Ken Wood with HDS</p>
<div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/StoragenerveComments?a=BYlWbJGAo4c:7Zu9heK0gb0:yIl2AUoC8zA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/StoragenerveComments?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/StoragenerveComments?a=BYlWbJGAo4c:7Zu9heK0gb0:TishOYyPd2w"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/StoragenerveComments?i=BYlWbJGAo4c:7Zu9heK0gb0:TishOYyPd2w" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/StoragenerveComments?a=BYlWbJGAo4c:7Zu9heK0gb0:TzevzKxY174"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/StoragenerveComments?d=TzevzKxY174" border="0"></img></a>
</div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/StoragenerveComments/~4/BYlWbJGAo4c" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://storagenerve.com/2010/07/27/storage-federation/comment-page-1/#comment-665</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on EMC Symmetrix Management Console (SMC – For Symmetrix V-Max Systems) by Guest</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/StoragenerveComments/~3/wxoyDQVZ5f0/</link>
		<dc:creator>Guest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2010 18:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://storagenerve.com/?p=486#comment-666</guid>
		<description>Do you know or have a source that knows how to set up the EMC Symmetrix Management Console on a 2003 Windows server??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you know or have a source that knows how to set up the EMC Symmetrix Management Console on a 2003 Windows server??</p>
<div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/StoragenerveComments?a=wxoyDQVZ5f0:eJf8ShNdzXs:yIl2AUoC8zA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/StoragenerveComments?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/StoragenerveComments?a=wxoyDQVZ5f0:eJf8ShNdzXs:TishOYyPd2w"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/StoragenerveComments?i=wxoyDQVZ5f0:eJf8ShNdzXs:TishOYyPd2w" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/StoragenerveComments?a=wxoyDQVZ5f0:eJf8ShNdzXs:TzevzKxY174"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/StoragenerveComments?d=TzevzKxY174" border="0"></img></a>
</div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/StoragenerveComments/~4/wxoyDQVZ5f0" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://storagenerve.com/2009/05/06/emc-symmetrix-management-console-symmetrix-v-max-systems/comment-page-1/#comment-666</feedburner:origLink></item>
</channel>
</rss>
