<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">

<channel>
	<title>Semantic Argument</title>
	
	<link>http://www.semanticargument.com</link>
	<description>The role of words in branding and everything else</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 14:58:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/SemanticArgument" /><feedburner:info uri="semanticargument" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><feedburner:emailServiceId>SemanticArgument</feedburner:emailServiceId><feedburner:feedburnerHostname>http://feedburner.google.com</feedburner:feedburnerHostname><item>
		<title>Thinking different</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/SemanticArgument/~3/15fpHE8Cw3c/</link>
		<comments>http://www.semanticargument.com/2010/03/03/thinking-different/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 14:58:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Brand Strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple Stores]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BusinessWeek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Circuit City]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corporate identity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[design thinking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IDEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPod]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michelangelo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mindsets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[package design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[proactive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reactive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Why Design Matters]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.semanticargument.com/?p=791</guid>
		<description>In my last post I wrote about the strategist&amp;#8217;s role of finding the compelling idea within an organization and stripping away the rest, and made an admittedly highfalutin&amp;#8217; comparison to Michelangelo&amp;#8217;s statement that the sculptor&amp;#8217;s task is to find the statue hidden inside every block of marble.
No one&amp;#8217;s saying brand strategy or corporate ID design [...]&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/SemanticArgument?a=15fpHE8Cw3c:-MZfwbo88MA:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/SemanticArgument?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/SemanticArgument?a=15fpHE8Cw3c:-MZfwbo88MA:D7DqB2pKExk"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/SemanticArgument?i=15fpHE8Cw3c:-MZfwbo88MA:D7DqB2pKExk" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/SemanticArgument?a=15fpHE8Cw3c:-MZfwbo88MA:V_sGLiPBpWU"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/SemanticArgument?i=15fpHE8Cw3c:-MZfwbo88MA:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/SemanticArgument?a=15fpHE8Cw3c:-MZfwbo88MA:qj6IDK7rITs"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/SemanticArgument?d=qj6IDK7rITs" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.semanticargument.com/2010/03/03/thinking-different/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.semanticargument.com/2010/03/03/thinking-different/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Throwing out the bathwater</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/SemanticArgument/~3/1sT-1kcjFwk/</link>
		<comments>http://www.semanticargument.com/2010/02/21/throwing-out-the-bathwater/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2010 08:49:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Brand Strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[accessibility of information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blaiq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Daniel Johnson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[extraneous information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[focus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Forbes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Forbes.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medal counts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michelangelo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MisEntropy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Olympics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[saying too much]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.semanticargument.com/?p=787</guid>
		<description>I just read a nice post on a blog called MisEntropy. The post is a reaction to the Forbes.com article entitled &amp;#8220;The Man Who Predicts the Medals,&amp;#8221; about an economist named Daniel Johnson who has predicted medal counts over the past five Olympics with 94% accuracy. The accuracy is impressive, but more interesting is Johnson&amp;#8217;s [...]&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/SemanticArgument?a=1sT-1kcjFwk:Dcu559Zrkhg:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/SemanticArgument?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/SemanticArgument?a=1sT-1kcjFwk:Dcu559Zrkhg:D7DqB2pKExk"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/SemanticArgument?i=1sT-1kcjFwk:Dcu559Zrkhg:D7DqB2pKExk" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/SemanticArgument?a=1sT-1kcjFwk:Dcu559Zrkhg:V_sGLiPBpWU"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/SemanticArgument?i=1sT-1kcjFwk:Dcu559Zrkhg:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/SemanticArgument?a=1sT-1kcjFwk:Dcu559Zrkhg:qj6IDK7rITs"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/SemanticArgument?d=qj6IDK7rITs" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.semanticargument.com/2010/02/21/throwing-out-the-bathwater/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.semanticargument.com/2010/02/21/throwing-out-the-bathwater/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Do abstract real words make the best brand names?</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/SemanticArgument/~3/CpEzTaRGoNA/</link>
		<comments>http://www.semanticargument.com/2010/02/02/do-abstract-real-words-make-the-best-brand-names/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 08:52:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Naming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[abstract names]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[best names]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coined names]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[composite names]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[compound names]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[descriptive names]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[domain name availability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[domain names]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[English words]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evocative names]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[functional names]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Igor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[invented names]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[July]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[name generation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[namers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[naming companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pollywog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[professional namers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[real words]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[real-word names]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shanghai]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Snark Hunting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SweetLeaf]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Hut]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Pollywog Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thinair]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark availability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[worst names]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[year-end lists]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.semanticargument.com/?p=777</guid>
		<description>It&amp;#8217;s been awhile since my last post. In the interim, I&amp;#8217;ve moved to Shanghai where I&amp;#8217;ll take a position as Senior Consultant with a Shanghai-based strategy firm. More on that later.
Today&amp;#8217;s post is about naming&amp;#8212;specifically naming in English, or at least for primarily English-speaking audiences (suppose I have to make that distinction now). Upon seeing [...]&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/SemanticArgument?a=CpEzTaRGoNA:H0ppelasgEI:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/SemanticArgument?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/SemanticArgument?a=CpEzTaRGoNA:H0ppelasgEI:D7DqB2pKExk"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/SemanticArgument?i=CpEzTaRGoNA:H0ppelasgEI:D7DqB2pKExk" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/SemanticArgument?a=CpEzTaRGoNA:H0ppelasgEI:V_sGLiPBpWU"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/SemanticArgument?i=CpEzTaRGoNA:H0ppelasgEI:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/SemanticArgument?a=CpEzTaRGoNA:H0ppelasgEI:qj6IDK7rITs"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/SemanticArgument?d=qj6IDK7rITs" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.semanticargument.com/2010/02/02/do-abstract-real-words-make-the-best-brand-names/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.semanticargument.com/2010/02/02/do-abstract-real-words-make-the-best-brand-names/</feedburner:origLink></item>
	</channel>
</rss>
