<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">

<channel>
	<title>Semantic Argument</title>
	
	<link>http://www.semanticargument.com</link>
	<description>The role of words in branding and everything else</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 09:18:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/SemanticArgument" /><feedburner:info uri="semanticargument" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><feedburner:emailServiceId>SemanticArgument</feedburner:emailServiceId><feedburner:feedburnerHostname>http://feedburner.google.com</feedburner:feedburnerHostname><item>
		<title>One word to ruin them all</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/SemanticArgument/~3/Us03SPpJzkE/</link>
		<comments>http://www.semanticargument.com/2010/09/01/one-word-to-ruin-them-all/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 09:18:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Writing/Grammar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[job postings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[then]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.semanticargument.com/?p=1232</guid>
		<description>Noticed the following job posting online and thought one word was out of place. The company&amp;#8217;s name has been changed to &amp;#8220;BrandCo&amp;#8221; to protect the innocent.
Imagine working for a company that allows you the opportunity to reach your potential. Somewhere you can have an impact, as part of an international team. Think about being part [...]&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/SemanticArgument?a=Us03SPpJzkE:tde8p15HhgM:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/SemanticArgument?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/SemanticArgument?a=Us03SPpJzkE:tde8p15HhgM:D7DqB2pKExk"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/SemanticArgument?i=Us03SPpJzkE:tde8p15HhgM:D7DqB2pKExk" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/SemanticArgument?a=Us03SPpJzkE:tde8p15HhgM:V_sGLiPBpWU"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/SemanticArgument?i=Us03SPpJzkE:tde8p15HhgM:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/SemanticArgument?a=Us03SPpJzkE:tde8p15HhgM:qj6IDK7rITs"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/SemanticArgument?d=qj6IDK7rITs" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.semanticargument.com/2010/09/01/one-word-to-ruin-them-all/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.semanticargument.com/2010/09/01/one-word-to-ruin-them-all/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>When the ad impairs the offering</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/SemanticArgument/~3/83DZKG7HOLE/</link>
		<comments>http://www.semanticargument.com/2010/08/23/when-the-ad-distracts-from-the-offering/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2010 08:10:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[above the fold]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[banner ad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[counterproductive advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[distractions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[magazine subscriptions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Economist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[website design]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.semanticargument.com/?p=1225</guid>
		<description>In this situation, when does The Economist start to ask themselves whether their advertising on their own site is becoming counterproductive? I count four near-identical ads above the fold, but because they&amp;#8217;re all the same red as the logo, I at first thought the logo was a fifth ad. Aside from being visually disturbing (the [...]&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/SemanticArgument?a=83DZKG7HOLE:Zlaauja6Ni8:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/SemanticArgument?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/SemanticArgument?a=83DZKG7HOLE:Zlaauja6Ni8:D7DqB2pKExk"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/SemanticArgument?i=83DZKG7HOLE:Zlaauja6Ni8:D7DqB2pKExk" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/SemanticArgument?a=83DZKG7HOLE:Zlaauja6Ni8:V_sGLiPBpWU"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/SemanticArgument?i=83DZKG7HOLE:Zlaauja6Ni8:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/SemanticArgument?a=83DZKG7HOLE:Zlaauja6Ni8:qj6IDK7rITs"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/SemanticArgument?d=qj6IDK7rITs" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.semanticargument.com/2010/08/23/when-the-ad-distracts-from-the-offering/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.semanticargument.com/2010/08/23/when-the-ad-distracts-from-the-offering/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Daddy, do fake brands come from fake branding agencies?</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/SemanticArgument/~3/2QMjuuErWgE/</link>
		<comments>http://www.semanticargument.com/2010/08/12/daddy-do-fake-brands-come-from-fake-branding-agencies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2010 09:13:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Brand Strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copycat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[doppelganger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fake brands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fake products]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[JundoBrand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Landor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[look and feel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lundor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[made in China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[originality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Slandor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[website design]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.semanticargument.com/?p=1216</guid>
		<description>Discovered this firm the other day and couldn&amp;#8217;t believe my eyes when I saw their website. Landor, meet your made-in-China doppelganger.
Is there some formal connection between these companies that justifies such blatant copycatting? Maybe, in which case this post is meaningless, and I probably owe JundoBrand an apology. But so far I haven&amp;#8217;t found any [...]&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/SemanticArgument?a=2QMjuuErWgE:kShSc2ANFSE:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/SemanticArgument?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/SemanticArgument?a=2QMjuuErWgE:kShSc2ANFSE:D7DqB2pKExk"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/SemanticArgument?i=2QMjuuErWgE:kShSc2ANFSE:D7DqB2pKExk" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/SemanticArgument?a=2QMjuuErWgE:kShSc2ANFSE:V_sGLiPBpWU"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/SemanticArgument?i=2QMjuuErWgE:kShSc2ANFSE:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/SemanticArgument?a=2QMjuuErWgE:kShSc2ANFSE:qj6IDK7rITs"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/SemanticArgument?d=qj6IDK7rITs" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.semanticargument.com/2010/08/12/daddy-do-fake-brands-come-from-fake-branding-agencies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.semanticargument.com/2010/08/12/daddy-do-fake-brands-come-from-fake-branding-agencies/</feedburner:origLink></item>
	</channel>
</rss>
